Skip to main content
Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters logoLink to Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters
. 2017 Mar 31;30(1):43–46.

New dressing combination for the treatment of partial thickness burn injuries in children

G Józsa 1,, E Tóth 1, Zs Juhász 1
PMCID: PMC5446908  PMID: 28592934

Summary

Burns are among the most common causes of injury in children. Several wound dressings are available to conservatively treat second-degree burns. Seventy-three children were treated with Aquacel Ag foam and Zn-hyaluronon gel to determine their effectiveness on partial thickness burns. We applied silver nitrate solution on 25% of patients for 24 hrs, then checked burn depth. If the burn was superficial second degree, we applied the dressing under study. All dressings were removed 6-7 days later. In the remaining children we used Aquacel Ag foam dressing with Zn-hyaluronon gel at first intervention. The dressing was checked on the second day, and removed on the sixth or seventh day (unless it had spontaneously separated). Hot water scalds were the main cause of injury. Other causes included hot oil, flame and contact, among others. Wound size was on average 5% total body surface area. Burns were seen on all body parts, and in 38 cases on more than one area. None of the 73 children treated with this dressing were diagnosed with wound infection. We observed the epithelialization of the burned areas on the 6th or 7th day after primary treatment. These dressings efficiently promote epithelialization, and a further advantage of Zn-hyaluronon gel is that it enhances cell regeneration and inhibits dressing fixation into the wound. Based on our experience, with this dressing combination we can achieve gentle, child-friendly and cost-effective treatment, excellent wound healing and favourable cosmetic results.

Keywords: second burn injury, treatment, silver foam dressing, children

Introduction

Burn injury - also known as combustion injury - is an impairment of the tissue, which is caused by extreme heat, electricity, chemicals, friction or radiation. Concerning children, in Hungary and worldwide the most affected age group is below the age of 5 years.1 The most common cause of burn injury in children is scald from hot water.

The severity of burns is influenced by several factors. The mechanism of the injury, length of time, depth and range of the burns, age, and general wellbeing of the child are important factors.2 Burns can be classified by damage to the skin layers (depth of burns) and extent of affected skin (percentage of total body surface area [TBSA] burned). The most moderate burn - called a first-degree burn (redness of the skin, like sunburn) - affects only the superficial skin layers without blisters or a wound. Generally, these superficial burns do not need medical care.

Partial thickness or second-degree burns (blisters covering a red base) reach the deeper skin layers, extending to the whole epidermis and the dermis. They can be divided into two further groups:

  • Second-degree superficial partial burns (II/A or II/1) penetrate into the dermal-epidermal papillary region.2 Therapy is mostly conservative. Plenty of conservative methods are known, such as bandaging with cream or solution, impregnated webs, modern foam, and vacuum therapy.

  • In cases of partial burns, which extend to the deeper layer (II/B or II/2), also the reticular layer of the dermis is damaged. The appropriate treatment is a surgical intervention to tangentially excise the necrotic skin part (debridement).

In the mixed type of second-degree burn, with the help of an appropriate indication, conservative treatment methods can also be used.

Third-degree burns (widespread thickness with a white, leathery appearance) extend to all layers of the skin and even further. Bones can be involved in fourth-degree burns (carbonization), the affected area homogeneously black and charred. These kinds of injury require complex surgical interventions.

To sum up, currently burns are classified as superficial (1st and 2nd degree [II/A or /II/1]) and deep (2nd degree [II/B or II/2] and 3rd degree).

Aquacel Ag foam is a hydrofiber dressing which consists of a superficial polyurethane waterproof layer and a multi-layered absorbent surface. It contains 1.2% silver ion. The dressing absorbs the wound secretion because the hydrofiber layer transforms into gel, which facilitates wound-humidification, faster healing, and blocks infections.3,4,5

The main component of Curiosa gel is Zinc-hyaluronon, which promotes cell regeneration and contributes to faster regeneration of the wound.6,7

Aquacel Ag, a hydrofiber dressing material containing silver, has been reported to produce good clinical results. However, only a limited number of studies exist in the paediatric population.8

While clinical studies with either Aquacel Ag foam or Curiosa gel have been conducted and beneficial effects of each treatment in superficial second degree burns have been found,8 to our knowledge no data is available on the effect of combining these treatments in the same burn types. The aim of this study is to present the results of treating children with superficial and mixed second-degree burn injuries with Zinc-hyaluronon gel combined with a special foam dressing containing silver.

Patients and methods

Prospective research was conducted between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2015 at the Surgical Unit, Department of Pediatrics in Pécs. Seventy-three (73) children with superficial and mixed-typed second-degree burns were treated with Zn-hyaluronon gel combined with Aquacel Ag foam.

In nearly 75% of the cases, burn depth was undoubtedly superficial. We applied Aquacel Ag foam dressing with Znhyaluronon gel primarily after debridement. If the burn depth was not clearly assessable (II/1 or II/2) by the primary care physician, we applied silver nitrate solution for 24 hrs. On the following day, burn depth was assessed by a burn specialist and in cases where the burn was superficial, we used the dressing under study. However, when the burn depth was II/2 degree, we continued initial therapy. At primary treatment, debridement was carried out with sedation or under general anaesthesia.

In cases where silver-nitrate dressing was applied at first intervention, the Zn-hyaluronon gel and Aquacel Ag foam dressing was used during the control examination on the following day and removed 7 days later. In children whose primary treatment was Ag foam dressing completed with Zn-hyaluronon gel, the dressing was checked on the 2nd day and removed on the 6th or 7th day.

Results

Seventy-three (73) patients were divided into 3 groups according to their age: children between 0-5 years (71.23%), between 6-10 years (15.07%) and over 10 years (13.7%). The most affected was the youngest age group (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Age distribution of the children.

Fig. 1

We also studied gender distribution. Out of 73 injured children, 44 were boys and 29 were girls. Similar to international and European incidence rates, boys (63.27%) are more likely to be exposed to burn injury (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Gender distribution of the study population.

Fig. 2

Concerning the causes of the burns, hot liquid scalds - for instance wounds from boiling water, tea, coffee, hot oil or other types of fluids - were the most common cause of injury (36/73 pts, 49.31%). As for contact burns, touching a radiator or a stove with the palm of the hand was frequent (21/73 pts, 28.77%). Some burns were caused by household equipment (7/73 pts, 9.59%), and others by stepping on a hot surface (3/73 pts, 4.11%). We documented 4 (5.48%) cases in which the injury originated directly from fire, including the flame of matches, candles and lighters. Only 1 child in the sample had injuries due to electricity (1.37%) and 1 (1.37%) due to other mechanisms (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3. Causes of injury in the study population.

Fig. 3

In 61 children (83.56%), wound size was smaller than 5% TBSA. In 4 children (5.48%), it was between 5 and 10% TBSA, and in 8 children (10.96%) the burn covered over 10% TBSA (Fig. 4). Burns were located on every body part, and in 38 cases (52.05%) on more than one area. The children with burns over 10% TBSA with more than one burnt area on their body were admitted to the ward. The most affected areas were the upper extremities, palms of the hands, and the chest.

Fig. 4. Extent of burns in the study population.

Fig. 4

Here, we report the short-term results of the study. Using the Zn-hyaluronon gel combined with Aquacel Ag foam dressing, no wound infections were diagnosed in the sample (73 children). In general, epithelialization of the burned area was observed 6-7 days after primary treatment (Figs. 5 and 6), which corresponds well with results from other methods of dressing for this type of burn. In the children treated with traditional methods, anaesthesia had to be used every day or every second day to change the dressing, while the foam dressing containing silver can be used until the wound heals.

Fig. 5. Contact second burn injury of the left crural region. (A) Left leg II/1-II/2 degree burn injury; (B) 2nd day: the proximal part of the wound basis is clear; (C) 4th day: the distal part is also clear, proximal epithelialization; (D) 10th day: the burn injury is healed.

Fig. 5

Fig. 6. Mixed type second degree burn injury of the thorax and abdomen. (A) Primary treatment: wide-ranging second-degree burn; (B) 2nd day: after removal of silver containing dressing; (C) 6th day: almost complete epithelialization; (D) 8th day: complete epithelialization.

Fig. 6

In 8 of the 73 children, debridement was performed because of a wide-ranging second-degree burn injury. Aquacel Ag foam and Zn-hyaluronon gel were applied after debridement. No anaesthesia was needed to change the dressings. Application and removal of the dressings were performed under analgesia. All escharotomies were performed under general anaesthesia. We observed the epithelialization of the burned areas 6 to 7 days after primary treatment.

Discussion

economic status, where the danger of an infection during the healing process is higher. It is important that, where possible, childhood burns are treated in a pediatric surgical department or burn centre. We conducted a prospective study for two years in one centre in Hungary, treating seventy-three (73) children with superficial and mixed-typed second-degree burns with Aquacel Ag foam and Zn-hyaluronon gel.

The limitations of our study are that it was conducted in one centre only and involved only one method. It was noncomparative and not randomized.

Most of the patients diagnosed with a burn injury under 5% were treated with this new method. Due to the modern dressings, epithelialization generally occurred on the 6th day, as in other previous studies.1 According to our results and in our experience, there were no cases of infection. Conservative treatment of burns with the widely-used local remedy, silver-sulfadiazine ointment, creates a heavy, oozing fatty layer that is difficult to tolerate. This thick, adherent layer also makes proper determination of burn depth very difficult. Silversulfadiazine was the gold standard for the treatment of superficial burns in our centre. Disadvantages of this treatment are the need for daily dressing changes and difficulty in assessing burn depth.4

Treatment of mixed-type burns is still a big challenge, and whether or not conservative treatment is sufficiently effective is a widely discussed topic. Treatment for a coherent and deep second-degree burn wound is a surgical intervention, whereas mixed-type second-degree burns can also be effectively treated with conservative methods.

In nearly 75% of the children, we used Aquacel Ag foam dressing with Zn-hyaluronon gel at the first intervention. We checked the dressing on the second day, and removed it on the sixth or seventh day. In 8 children, the combination dressing was applied after escharotomy, and removed 10 days after surgical intervention.

Hydrofiber dressing containing silver combined with hyaluronon gel containing zinc tends to be effective against infections and also promotes wound healing. The dressing is comfortable and can be easily applied. It also creates an appropriate environment for proper wound healing. 6,8 In contrast to traditional treatments, applying, changing and removing a combination of Aquacel Ag foam and Zn-hyaluronon dressing is painless, and in 62 cases anaesthesia was not required. A very important aspect of this new method is that it reduces physical strain and stress for the child due to fewer checks and dressing changes. On average, 2.5 dressings were used on each child that did not require escharotomy. Due to the reduced number of dressings and anaesthesia required, the approximate cost of treatment per child was cut by half. Currently there are only a few clinical studies reported in the literature on the application of Aquacel Ag dressing to paediatric patients with partial thickness burns.9,10,11,12 In these studies, hospital length of stay was significantly shorter for the Aquacel Ag group.9,12 Moreover, dressing frequency was 3-4 times lower in the Aquacel Ag group than in the standard dressing group.8

Conclusion

According to our experience and study results, Aquacel Ag foam dressing combined with Zn-hyaluronon gel can be considered to be an effective, gentle and child-friendly treatment, which ensures preferential wound healing and adequate cosmetic results. We must note, however, that this dressing should be applied only after an exact estimation of burn depth.

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest.The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related to this article.

References

  • 1.Brusselaers N, Monstrey S, Vogelaers D, Hoste E, Blot S. Severe burn injury in Europe: a systematic review of the incidence, etiology, morbidity, and mortality. Critical Care. 2010;14:R188. doi: 10.1186/cc9300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Juhász I. Az égések osztályozása, diagnosztikája, sürgősségi ellátása. Helyi konzervatív kezelés égésben. Magyar Családorvosok Lapja. 2010;3(2):15–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yarboro DD. A comparative study of the dressings silver sulfadiazine and Aquacel Ag in the management of superficial partial-thickness burns. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2013;26(6):259–262. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000431084.85141.d1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Verbelen J, Hoeksema H, Heyneman A, Pirayesh A, Monstrey S. Aquacel® Ag dressing versus Acticoat™ dressing in partial thickness burns: a prospective, randomized, controlled study in 100 patients. Part 1: burn wound healing. Burns. 2014;4083):416–427. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ding X, Shi L, Liu C, Sun B. A randomized comparison study of Aquacel Ag and Alginate Silver as skin graft donor site dressings. Burns. 2013;39(8):1547–1550. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Juhász I, Zoltán P, Erdei I. Treatment of partial thickness burns with Zn. hyaluronon: Lessons of a clinical pilot study. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2012;25(2):82–85. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Illés J, Jávor A, Szíjártó E. Zinc-hyaluronate: an original organotherapeutic compound of Gedeon Richter Ltd. Acta Pharm Hung. 2002;72(1):15–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lau CT, Wong KK, Tam P. Silver containing hydrofiber dressing promotes wound healing in paediatric patients with partial thickness burns. Pediatr Surg Int. 2016;32(6):577–581. doi: 10.1007/s00383-016-3895-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Paddock HN, Fabia R, Giles S, Hayes J. A silver impregnated antimicrobial dressing reduces hospital length of stay for pediatric patients with burns. J Burn Care Res. 2007;28:409–411. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0B013E318053D2B9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Saba SC, Tsai R, Glat P. Clinical evaluation comparing the efficacy of aquacel ag hydrofiber dressing versus petrolatum gauze with antibiotic ointment in partial-thickness burns in a pediatric burn center. J Burn Care Res. 2009;30:380–385. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181a2898f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Brown M, Dalziel SR, Herd E, Johnson K. A randomized controlled study of silver-based burns dressing in a pediatric emergency department. J Burn Care Res. 2015;37(4):340–347. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Paddock HN, Fabia R, Giles S, Hayes J. A silver-impregnated antimicrobial dressing reduces hospital costs for pediatric burn patients. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42:211–213. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.09.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters are provided here courtesy of Euro-Mediterranean Council for Burns and Fire Disasters (MBC)

RESOURCES