Skip to main content
3 Biotech logoLink to 3 Biotech
. 2017 May 30;7(2):97. doi: 10.1007/s13205-017-0740-7

Characterization of Thiomonas delicata arsenite oxidase expressed in Escherichia coli

Wei Kheng Teoh 1, Faezah Mohd Salleh 1, Shafinaz Shahir 1,
PMCID: PMC5449285  PMID: 28560637

Abstract

Microbial arsenite oxidation is an essential biogeochemical process whereby more toxic arsenite is oxidized to the less toxic arsenate. Thiomonas strains represent an important arsenite oxidizer found ubiquitous in acid mine drainage. In the present study, the arsenite oxidase gene (aioBA) was cloned from Thiomonas delicata DSM 16361, expressed heterologously in E. coli and purified to homogeneity. The purified recombinant Aio consisted of two subunits with the respective molecular weights of 91 and 21 kDa according to SDS-PAGE. Aio catalysis was optimum at pH 5.5 and 50–55 °C. Aio exhibited stability under acidic conditions (pH 2.5–6). The V max and K m values of the enzyme were found to be 4 µmol min−1 mg−1 and 14.2 µM, respectively. SDS and Triton X-100 were found to inhibit the enzyme activity. The homology model of Aio showed correlation with the acidophilic adaptation of the enzyme. This is the first characterization studies of Aio from a species belonging to the Thiomonas genus. The arsenite oxidase was found to be among the acid-tolerant Aio reported to date and has the potential to be used for biosensor and bioremediation applications in acidic environments.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13205-017-0740-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Keywords: Acidic tolerance, Arsenite oxidase, Molecular modeling, Recombinant expression, Thiomonas delicata

Introduction

Arsenite oxidase catalyzes the oxidation of arsenite to arsenate by a two-electron transfer. Arsenite oxidase consists of two heterologous subunits; a large catalytic subunit (AioA) with bis-molybdopterin guanine dinucleotide (bis-MGD) cofactor and a 3Fe-4S iron sulfur cluster, and a small subunit (AioB) with Rieske 2Fe-2S center. Arsenite oxidase is a member of the dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) reductase family of molybdoenzyme which is a family of different prokaryotic redox enzymes that function in electron transport chain (Romão 2009).

Arsenite oxidizing bacteria have been isolated from diverse arsenic contaminated environments, such as cattle-dipping fluids, hot springs, mine tailing and drainage water. As an ancient bioenergetic enzyme which utilizes arsenite, a highly toxic metalloid as substrate, characterization of arsenite oxidase is of special interest for bioremediation and biosensor construction. To date, there are two extensively characterized arsenite oxidase which origin from a chemolithoautotrophic Alphaproteobacteria Rhizobium sp. NT-26 and heterotrophic Betaproteobacteria Alcaligenes faecalis. Both bacteria grow optimally at slightly alkaline pH 8, which can be categorized as alkaline-tolerant bacteria.

In mining environments, particularly acid mine drainage (AMD), inorganic As(III) are widespread as a result from the bioleaching of arsenic-bearing minerals. Under low pH condition, arsenite oxidizers from these extreme environment are commonly isolated with acid-tolerant properties with an optimum growth pH near neutrality with the exception of Thiomonas strains (Hallberg and Johnson 2003; Battaglia-Brunet et al. 2006; Katayama et al. 2006; Duquesne et al. 2008; Bryan et al. 2009; Arsène-Ploetze et al. 2010), that grow optimally around pH 5. Microbial metabolism in AMD causes natural attenuation process to occur whereby Thiomonas strains are suggested to have acted as the arsenite oxidizer (Casiot et al. 2003; Duquesne et al. 2003; Morin et al. 2003; Bruneel et al. 2006; Battaglia-Brunet et al. 2011; Bertin et al. 2011). Thiomonas strains are therefore essential for maintaining the arsenic biogeochemical cycle in AMD. Oxidation of As(III) plays a pivotal role in the natural bioremediation since it could contribute to an improved immobilization of arsenic in helping to mitigate arsenic contamination. Freel et al. (2015) showed that several phylogenetic groups of Thiomonas strains populated along Regious creek AMD for more than a decade even though in low abundance. Since the arsenic genomic islands are identified to have evolved differentially in the closely related Thiomonas strains, there are differences in the arsenite oxidation capability in the arsenic-rich environment (Freel et al. 2015).

Thiomonas delicata DSM 16361, isolated from Cheni gold mine, shows high arsenite oxidizing capability of 4 mg As(III) l−1 h−1 which grows optimally at pH 4–7 as a moderate acidophile (Battaglia-Brunet et al. 2006). Most interestingly, purification and detailed characterization of Aio from facultative chemolithoautotrophic arsenite oxidizing Thiomonas strains have yet to be described. The characterization of the arsenite oxidase is of great importance as we could further explore the enzymatic features that contribute to the irreplaceable role of Thiomonas strains as an arsenite oxidizer in AMD. This could facilitate the engineering of enzymes and aid in construction of robust biosensor for monitoring arsenic in acid mining effluent. Therefore, in this study, by performing heterologous expression and purification of the arsenite oxidase from T. delicata, we characterized the arsenite oxidase in terms of its biochemical properties. Homology modeling of the enzyme was constructed to support the experimental findings. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first characterization study of arsenite oxidase from a chemolithoautotrophic betaproteobacterium.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

Thiomonas delicata DSM 16361 was obtained from German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ) and grown in R2A medium (pH 7.2). Recombinant strains were grown aerobically at 37 °C in Luria–Bertani broth supplemented with 100 µg ampicillin ml−1.

Gene cloning and construction of the recombinant plasmid

Genomic DNA was extracted by using Wizard Genomic DNA Purification kit (Promega). Based on the sequence of Thiomonas 3As arsenite oxidase gene (GenBank accession no. FP475956.1), oligonucleotide primers 5′-GGAGGCCATATGACCGAAAAAGTATCGCGTCGC-3′ and 5′-GGAAAGCTTTCACGATTCAAACCCCGTACATGCG-3′ were designed to amplify the region of full length arsenite oxidase gene (aioBA) using Kapa HiFi Polymerase (Kapa Biosystem). With NdeI and HindIII restriction sites incorporated (underline), the amplified aioBA was cloned into pET21a (Novagen). According to Van Lis et al. (2012), a His-tag was introduced using PCR with forward primer using 5′-TAAGCCCATCACCGTCAGG-3′ and reverse primer 5′-GTGGTGGTGGTGGTGGTGCAGCACGTTGGCCTGGCG-3′ using as template the aioBA-pET21a construct. The construct aioBA-His-pET21a was then transformed into E. coli strain C43. The recombinant plasmid was confirmed by DNA sequencing. The sequence of the aioBA cloned from T. delicata DSM 16361 has been submitted to the GenBank database under the accession number of KX792110.

Heterologous expression of T. delicata Aio in E. coli and purification of the recombinant enzyme

The expression of recombinant Aio was performed in ZYM-5052 autoinduction medium (Studier 2005) including 100 µg ampicillin ml−1 and 1 mM Na2MoO4 for 48 h in 20 °C at 180 rpm. Purification of Aio was performed from the total soluble fraction of recombinant E. coli cells. The cells were harvested and resuspended in cold binding buffer (20 mM NaH2PO4, pH 7.4, 500 mM NaCl, 20 mM Imidazole) and lysed by using Qsonica Sonicator Q700 (amplitude 50%, 1 s pulse on 1 s pulse off for 3 min). Unlysed cells were removed by centrifugation at 10,000×g for 10 min, and the lysate was subsequently ultracentrifuged at 110,000×g for 1 h 30 min to remove membrane fraction. The resulting supernatant was collected, filtered (0.22 μm filters, Merck Millipore) and then loaded onto HisTrap HP 1 ml column (GE Healthcare), with flow rate set at 0.5 ml min−1 for optimal protein loading. The column was equilibrated and washed with binding buffer with flow rate 1 ml min−1 before eluted in elution buffer (20 mM NaH2PO4, pH 7.4, 500 mM NaCl, 500 mM Imidazole) using imidazole gradient (20–500 mM). The fraction containing active enzyme was pooled and dialyzed against 50 mM MES buffer pH 5.5. The precipitated protein was then removed by centrifugation at 10,000×g for 5 min. The supernatant was concentrated with Vivaspin 20 (MWCO 10,000 Da) centrifugal concentrator and loaded onto a HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 200 pre-equilibrated with 50 mM MES buffer pH 5.5, 150 mM NaCl. Flow rate was set at 0.3 ml min−1. All chromatography steps were carried out at room temperature (20–25 °C) using ÄKTAprime plus (GE Healthcare Life Sciences). Freshly purified enzyme was then concentrated for activity assay and SDS-PAGE was carried out according to method from Laemmli (1970).

Enzyme assays

Arsenite oxidase activity was assayed according to the method from Anderson et al. (1992) in 50 mM MES buffer (pH 5.5) with 60 µM of an artificial electron acceptor 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol (DCPIP) and 200 µM arsenite. Reduction of DCPIP was monitored spectrophotometrically at 600 nm at 25 °C for 5 min (ε600 pH 5.5 experimentally determined at 10 mm−1 cm−1) using 100 Vis Spectrophotometer (Buck Scientific). Protein concentration was determined by Bradford assay with bovine serum albumin as standard.

The kinetic study of the expressed enzyme was carried out using 0.5 µg ml−1 and varying concentrations of arsenite (5–500 µM) in 50 mM MES (pH 5.5) at 25 °C, and the results were analyzed using Michaelis–Menten enzyme kinetic model using GraphPad Prism 7. One unit of Aio activity was defined as the amount of enzyme to oxidize 1 µmol of arsenite per min under the assay conditions.

The effect of pH on Aio activity was investigated at 25 °C in 50 mM citrate–phosphate buffer (pH 2.5–4), MES buffer (pH 5–6), sodium phosphate (pH 7–8) and glycine–NaOH (pH 9–10). The pH-dependent stability was measured by incubating Aio (0.03 mg ml−1) in 50 mM of buffer (pH 2.5–10) for 16 h at 4 °C prior to measurement of the residual enzymatic activity. The effect of temperature on Aio activity was examined in 50 mM MES (pH 5.5) between 25 and 70 °C. Thermal stability was determined by measuring the residual activity after incubating Aio at temperatures between 25 and 70 °C after 1 h.

The effect of different metal ions and chemical agents towards enzyme activity was investigated. The enzyme (0.01 mg ml−1) was assayed in the presence of 10 mM metal ions (K+, Li+, Ca2+, Co2+, Ni2+, Mn2+ and Zn2+) and anions (NO2−, SO4 2− and Cl). The effects of different surfactant concentrations (SDS and Triton X-100) and chemical reagents (EDTA and urea) on enzyme stability were examined with the additive in the reaction mixture for the assay. The enzyme activity without any additive was taken as 100%.

Statistical analysis

All the experiments were conducted in triplicates measurements. The means were compared by ANOVA at 5% significance level. The SPSS statistical package (IBM SPSS Statistics 23) was used for statistical evaluations.

Bioinformatics analysis

The homology model of arsenite oxidase from T. delicata was generated using the SWISS-MODEL workspace with arsenite oxidase crystal structure from A. faecalis (PDB: 1G8K chains A and B) as template. The Poisson–Boltzmann electrostatic potentials were calculated using the PDB2PQR and APBS. The structural superimposition and graphical representation of the structure model was prepared in UCSF CHIMERA software.

Results and discussion

T. delicata arsenite oxidase gene cloning and analysis

A total of 3093 bp gene cluster comprising of both aioB and aioA was amplified successfully from genomic DNA of T. delicata DSM 16361. Nucleotide BLAST search of both aioB and aioA revealed high homology with Aio gene from a number of Thiomonas strains, with both genes sharing highest sequence identity of 99% to Thiomonas sp. CB2. Compared to previously characterized Aio, the deduced amino acid sequence of AioA (841 amino acid residues) display sequence identity of 65, 63, 62, 45% from Herminiimonas arsenicoxydans, A. faecalis, Ralstonia sp. 22 and Rhizobium sp. NT-26, respectively. The deduced amino acid sequence AioB (179 amino acid residues) shared sequence identity of 61, 58, 56, 41% from A. faecalis, Herminiimonas arsenicoxydans, Ralstonia sp. 22 and Rhizobium sp. NT-26, respectively.

Expression of Aio in E. coli and purification of the recombinant enzyme

Under the control of T7 promoter in plasmid pET-21a, the aioBA was expressed in E. coli C43 using autoinduction, where lactose acts as the inducer for protein expression. Recombinant proteins were purified by sequential Ni–NTA and gel filtration chromatographic steps. Purity of Aio was checked by the limit of electrophoresis and estimated to be 90% pure (Fig. 1). Similar to other arsenite oxidases (Ellis et al. 2001; Santini and vanden Hoven 2004; Duquesne et al. 2008; Prasad et al. 2009), the size of the large subunit arsenite oxidase (AioA) was around 91 kDa while small subunit (AioB) was 21 kDa without removing the signal peptide.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

SDS-PAGE gel of purified Aio stained with Coomassie Blue R350. Lane 1 Protein molecular weight marker; lane 2 T. delicata Aio

Characterization of recombinant Aio

By utilizing DCPIP as the artificial electron acceptor, the recombinant Aio showed typical Michaelis–Menten kinetics with substrate arsenite, with V max of 4 ± 0.07 µmol arsenite oxidized min−1 mg−1 of proteins and K m 14.2 ± 1.03 µM (Fig. 2). K m of the recombinant Aio was found to be higher than Aio from A. faecalis, but lower than Arthrobacter sp. 15b and NT-26 (Table 1). High K m indicated the lower affinity of the arsenite oxidase towards arsenite substrate. As for the V max, the T. delicata Aio displayed a higher specific activity than the other arsenite oxidases.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Kinetic plot obtained with recombinant T. delicata Aio with substrate arsenite

Table 1.

Characteristic of T. delicata Aio compared with Aio from other mesophilic organisms

Source K m (µM) V max (U mg−1) References
Thiomonas delicata 14.2 4 This study
Alcaligenes faecalis 8 2.88 Anderson et al. (1992)
Arthrobacter sp. 15b 26 2.45 Prasad et al. (2009)
Rhizobium sp. NT-26 61 2.4 Santini and vanden Hoven  (2004)

One unit of enzyme activity is defined as the amount of enzyme necessary to oxidize 1 μmol of arsenite per min using DCPIP as electron acceptor under the assay conditions

The purified Aio displayed a typical bell-shaped pH–activity relationship with maximum activity at pH 5.5, which is the same as Aio NT-26 (Santini and vanden Hoven 2004) and >80% relative activity between pH 5 and 6 (Fig. 3a). However, after incubation for 16 h at 4 °C, the pH stability profile was shifted where the enzyme retained high activity at pH 2.5–4 and >80% relative activity between pH 3 and 6. Beyond pH 7, there was a drastic reduction in the enzyme activity. At pH 7–9, the activity preserved was almost 60%, while at pH 10, only 30% activity was retained (Fig. 3b). Since T. delicata has the ability to grow in wide pH range from pH 4 to 7, it is possible for Aio to develop acid-stable properties to tolerate the pH fluctuation at the transition zones of acidic mine waters.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Effects of pH and temperature on the activity of purified Aio. a pH–activity profile; b pH stability relationship; c temperature activity dependence; d temperature stability profile. The effect of pH on Aio activity was investigated at 25 °C in 50 mM buffer (pH 2.5–7). The 100% relative activity was 3.1 ± 0.2 µmol min−1 mg−1. pH stability studies were carried out by incubating enzymes (0.03 mg ml−1) in 50 mM buffers (pH 2.5–10) at 4 °C for 16 h prior to measurement of residual activity. The 100% relative activity was 3.5 ± 0.3 µmol min−1 mg−1. The effect of temperature on Aio activity was examined in 50 mM MES (pH 5.5) from 25 to 70 °C. 100% relative activity was 3.4 ± 0.2 µmol min−1 mg−1. The temperature–stability relationship was studied after incubation at different temperature (10–70 °C) for 1 h in 50 mM MES (pH 5.5). 100% relative activity was 3.7 ± 0.05 µmol min−1 mg−1. Data points and error bars represent mean and standard error of at least three assays, respectively, p < 0.05

Optimum activity of Aio was found at 50 °C, but statistically at par with 55 °C. Relatively high activity was noticeable at 40 and 55 °C (Fig. 3c). Aio retained nearly 45% of its initial activity after incubation at 60 °C for 1 h (Fig. 3d). Even though there is a slight drop in the optimum temperature as compared with Aio from A. faecalis and NT-26 (60 °C), the Aio is still considered rather thermostable. These results showed that Aio is an acid-tolerant and thermostable enzyme.

Purified Aio was tested with a variety of cations, anions and chemical agents which might influence the enzyme activity. The selected metal ions and chemical agents showed no apparent inhibition to the Aio activity with more than 80% residual activity retained as shown in Table 2. Both Co2+ and Zn2+ did not exhibit obvious inhibition to Aio activity as to Arthrobacter sp. 15b Aio (Prasad et al. 2009). Co2+ and Zn2+ strongly inhibited Arthrobacter sp. 15b Aio where only 1.5 and 1.8% arsenite oxidation activity was retained after treatment (Prasad et al. 2009). By comparison, T. delicata Aio was tolerant to Co2+ and Zn2+, retaining 84 and 88% residual activity, respectively. This heavy metal tolerance of T. delicata Aio is possible, whereby genes conferring resistance to zinc and cobalt were found in the genome of Thiomonas sp. 3As (Arsène-Ploetze et al. 2010). The addition of 10 mM sulphate anion (SO4 2−) did not inhibit T. delicata Aio as well. This ability to tolerate high sulphate anions might be explained by the presence of this anion in AMD formed via the oxidation of pyrite that could lead to an increased ability of T. delicata Aio to resist sulphate. Surfactant SDS and Triton X-100 were observed to inhibit the activity of Aio with residual activity of 60 and 19%.

Table 2.

Effects of metal ions, anions and chemicals on arsenite oxidase activity

Relative activity (%)
Control 100 ± 5.1
Metal ions (10 mM)
 K+ 91.9 ± 4.2
 Li+ 104.6 ± 4.9
 Ca2+ 94.9 ± 1.3
 Co2+ 83.8 ± 7.5
 Ni2+ 89.9 ± 7.4
 Mn2+ 101 ± 1.8
 Zn2+ 87.8 ± 3.4
Anions
 NO2− 94.4 ± 8.9
 SO4 2− 93.9 ± 1.8
 Cl 100.2 ± 4.9
Chemicals
 Urea (10 mM) 100.3 ± 1.7
 EDTA (10 mM) 91.3 ± 1.8
 SDS (2 mM) 60.9 ± 8.5
 Triton X-100 (0.1%, v/v) 19.5 ± 1.7

Values are represented by mean and standard error of at least three assays. 100% relative activity = 3.9 ± 0.2 µmol min−1 mg−1

Homology modeling analysis

To explore the structural basis underlying the differences in enzymatic properties, a homology model was built using A. faecalis Aio crystal structure was used as a template by SWISS-MODEL. The reliability of the model was supported by its high sequence identity of 64% and with QMEAN4 score of −2.16. Comparison of the homology model and template showed high similarity in overall fold as well as active site residues. Notable difference between the template and model was observed on the surfaces of the enzyme (Fig. 4). One of the distinct features of Aio is the existence of a 15-residue-longer loop near the catalytic cleft. The loop region is unique in all Thiomonas strain. This could contribute to the difference in enzyme stability and flexibility, where the longer surface loop can lead to an increase of possible amplitude of the movement between the secondary structures.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Space-filling homology model of T. delicata Aio. Active site of the enzyme is boxed. Conserved residues between the T. delicata Aio and A. faecalis structure are red; different residues are blue

In extreme environments, the nature of protein surfaces plays essential roles to maintain the protein stability. Located either at periplasm or membrane attached, Aio is likely to be exposed to pH of the extracellular environment. A study from Wilks and Slonczewski (2007) demonstrated that the periplasm of gram negative bacteria do maintain the same proton concentration as the surrounding environment even though the cytoplasm is maintained at near neutral pH. Therefore, by calculating the electrostatic potential data of the surfaces of Aio (Fig. 5), it was revealed that the surfaces of T. delicata Aio are rich with positively charge residues, while A. faecalis and NT-26 Aio have more negatively charged surface residues. This observation might contribute to the pH stability of T. delicata Aio, whereby penetration of hydronium ions inside a structure of predominantly basic protein surface can be avoided at low pH as shown in an acid-resistant citrate synthase (Francois et al. 2006).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Electrostatic rendering of the solvent-accessible surface of a T. delicata Aio, b A. faecalis 1G8K and c NT-26 4AAY. Computed at pH 7 with red (−5 kT/e) and blue (5 kT/e)

Conclusion

The characterization of Aio from a species belonging to the Thiomonas genus was described for the first time. The high activity of T. delicata DSM 16361 Aio coupled with acid-stable and metal tolerance properties suggests that the enzyme has potential to be used for biosensor and bioremediation applications in acidic environments.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

13205_2017_740_MOESM1_ESM.doc (445.5KB, doc)

Supplementary Figure 1 Structure analysis of T. delicata Aio with crystal structures of A. faecalis (PDB: 1G8K) and NT-26 (PDB: 4AAY). a Superimposition of homology model T. delicata Aio with crystal structures of A. faecalis (PDB: 1G8K) and NT-26 (PDB: 4AAY) colored in pink, cyan and blue, respectively. The pterin cofactor, 3Fe-4S and 2Fe-2S clusters are shown as space filling spheres. b Close-up view of the conserved active site residues of T. delicata Aio, A. faecalis and NT-26. (DOC 445 kb)

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grant from Universiti Teknologi Malaysia GUP (Grant Number: 07H70) and MyBrain15 which is funded by Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13205-017-0740-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Contributor Information

Wei Kheng Teoh, Email: wkteoh2@live.utm.my.

Faezah Mohd Salleh, Email: faezah@utm.my.

Shafinaz Shahir, Phone: +607-555 7549, Email: shafinazshahir@utm.my.

References

  1. Anderson GL, Williams J, Hille R. The purification and characterization of arsenite oxidase from Alcaligenes faecalis, a molybdenum-containing hydroxylase. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:23674–23682. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arsène-Ploetze F, Koechler S, Marchal M, et al. Structure, function, and evolution of the Thiomonas spp. genome. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1000859. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Battaglia-Brunet F, Joulian C, Garrido F, et al. Oxidation of arsenite by Thiomonas strains and characterization of Thiomonas arsenivorans sp. nov. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2006;89:99–108. doi: 10.1007/s10482-005-9013-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Battaglia-Brunet F, El Achbouni H, Quemeneur M, et al. Proposal that the arsenite-oxidizing organisms Thiomonas cuprina and “Thiomonas arsenivorans” be reclassified as strains of Thiomonas delicata, and emended description of Thiomonas delicata. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2011;61:2816–2821. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.023408-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bertin PN, Heinrich-Salmeron A, Pelletier E, et al. Metabolic diversity among main microorganisms inside an arsenic-rich ecosystem revealed by meta- and proteo-genomics. ISME J. 2011;5:1735–1747. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bruneel O, Duran R, Casiot C, et al. Diversity of microorganisms in Fe-As-rich acid mine drainage waters of Carnoulès, France. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:551–556. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.1.551-556.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bryan CG, Marchal M, Battaglia-Brunet F, et al. Carbon and arsenic metabolism in Thiomonas strains: differences revealed diverse adaptation processes. BMC Microbiol. 2009;9:127. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-9-127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Casiot C, Morin G, Juillot F, et al. Bacterial immobilization and oxidation of arsenic in acid mine drainage (Carnoulès creek, France) Water Res. 2003;37:2929–2936. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00080-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Duquesne K, Lebrun S, Casiot C, et al. Immobilization of arsenite and ferric iron by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and its relevance to acid mine drainage immobilization of arsenite and ferric iron by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and its relevance to acid mine drainage. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:6165–6173. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.10.6165-6173.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Duquesne K, Lieutaud A, Ratouchniak J, et al. Arsenite oxidation by a chemoautotrophic moderately acidophilic Thiomonas sp.: from the strain isolation to the gene study. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10:228–237. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01447.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ellis PJ, Conrads T, Hille R, Kuhn P. Crystal structure of the 100 kDa arsenite oxidase from Alcaligenes faecalis in two crystal forms at 1.64 and 2.03 Å. Structure. 2001;9:125–132. doi: 10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00566-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Francois JA, Starks CM, Sivanuntakorn S, et al. Structure of a NADH-insensitive hexameric citrate synthase that resists acid inactivation. Biochemistry. 2006;45:13487–13499. doi: 10.1021/bi061083k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Freel KC, Krueger MC, Farasin J, et al. Adaptation in toxic environments: arsenic genomic islands in the bacterial genus Thiomonas. PLoS One. 2015;10:1–20. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hallberg KB, Johnson DB. Novel acidophiles isolated from moderately acidic mine drainage waters. Hydrometallurgy. 2003;71:139–148. doi: 10.1016/S0304-386X(03)00150-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Katayama Y, Uchino Y, Wood AP, Kelly DP. Confirmation of Thiomonas delicata (formerly Thiobacillus delicatus) as a distinct species of the genus Thiomonas Moreira and Amils 1997 with comments on some species currently assigned to the genus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006;56:2553–2557. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64299-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227:680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Morin G, Juillot F, Casiot C, et al. Bacterial formation of tooeleite and mixed arsenic(III) or arsenic(V)–Iron(III) gels in the Carnoulès Acid mine drainage, France. A XANES, XRD, and SEM study. Environ Sci Technol. 2003;37:1705–1712. doi: 10.1021/es025688p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Prasad KS, Subramanian V, Paul J. Purification and characterization of arsenite oxidase from Arthrobacter sp. Biometals. 2009;22:711–721. doi: 10.1007/s10534-009-9215-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Romão MJ. Molybdenum and tungsten enzymes: a crystallographic and mechanistic overview. Dalt Trans. 2009 doi: 10.1039/b821108f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Santini JM, vanden Hoven RN. Molybdenum-containing arsenite oxidase of the chemolithoautotrophic arsenite oxidizer NT-26. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:1614–1619. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.6.1614-1619.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Studier FW. Protein production by auto-induction in high-density shaking cultures. Protein Expr Purif. 2005;41:207–234. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2005.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Van Lis R, Nitschke W, Warelow TP, et al. Heterologously expressed arsenite oxidase: a system to study biogenesis and structure/function relationships of the enzyme family. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenergy. 2012;1817:1701–1708. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wilks JC, Slonczewski JL. pH of the cytoplasm and periplasm of Escherichia coli: rapid measurement by green fluorescent protein fluorimetry. J Bacteriol. 2007;189:5601–5607. doi: 10.1128/JB.00615-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

13205_2017_740_MOESM1_ESM.doc (445.5KB, doc)

Supplementary Figure 1 Structure analysis of T. delicata Aio with crystal structures of A. faecalis (PDB: 1G8K) and NT-26 (PDB: 4AAY). a Superimposition of homology model T. delicata Aio with crystal structures of A. faecalis (PDB: 1G8K) and NT-26 (PDB: 4AAY) colored in pink, cyan and blue, respectively. The pterin cofactor, 3Fe-4S and 2Fe-2S clusters are shown as space filling spheres. b Close-up view of the conserved active site residues of T. delicata Aio, A. faecalis and NT-26. (DOC 445 kb)


Articles from 3 Biotech are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES