Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 31.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2016 Feb 17;530(7591):495–498. doi: 10.1038/nature16970

Extended Data Figure 7. Pins does not contribute to Mud-dependent epithelial cell division orientation.

Extended Data Figure 7

(a) Rose plots of the difference between the theoretically predicted (θtheory) and the experimental division (θdivision) orientation of the mitotic spindle in pins tissue (orange left rose plot) and wt tissue (green right) based on the GFP:Mud intensity. To facilitate the comparison between the left and the right rose plots, the data are duplicated relative to 0° line (light orange and light green).Number of cells (n) analysed is indicated. p value, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.

(b) Quantifications of the co-localization of GFP:Mud with Gli in pins in metaphase cells (±s.e.m.). Number of cells (n) analysed is indicated. ns: not significant (Student t-test).