Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2017 May 1;9(5):e1208. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1208

Solid Variant of an Aneurysmal Bone Cyst of the Thoracic Spine

Varshil Mehta 1,, Pravin Padalkar 2, Maya Kale 3, Ambadas Kathare 2
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC5451203  PMID: 28580205

Abstract

The solid variant of an aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC) has been observed very rarely, especially those involving the spine. In this case report, we present a very unusual tumour of the thoracic spine which was managed by 360˚ decompression via posterior-only approach and stabilization.

A 16-year-old boy presented to us with a sudden onset of weakness in both lower limbs leading to paraplegia. He also had a history of back and chest pain over the past one year. A collapse of the T5 vertebrae on plain radiograph was observed. The patient was immediately shifted to the operation theatre with an initial plan of a total en bloc spondylectomy of the T5. However, intraoperatively, histology favored a solid-ABC variant rather than a spindle cell tumour or giant cell tumour. Thus, the initial plan was revised to a 360˚ decompression without resecting the body en bloc via a posterolateral approach.

After surgery, complete resolution of his sensory and motor dysfunction was achieved. His chest and back pain also resolved. The diseased vertebral body gradually healed and new bone formation was seen at 18 months postoperatively.

This case report concludes that a solid variant of an ABC should be considered as a differential diagnosis for tumours involving the spine. An intraoperative frozen section procedure should be undertaken, especially during emergency situations. Early diagnosis and appropriate surgical management play an important role in the successful management of a solid variant of ABC.

Keywords: abc, osteolytic lesion, bone tumor

Introduction

The solid variant of an aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC) is a very rare case which generally accounts for about 3.4% to 7.5% of all ABCs [1]. It is a cystic lesion that can occur and expand in any part of the bone, often affecting individuals in the second decade of their lives [2]. A definitive diagnosis is impossible but there are radiographic characteristics that are highly suggestive of ABCs on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans.

Jaffe and Lichtenstein first described ABC in 1942, when they noted, "a peculiar blood-containing cyst of large size" [3]. As many as 69% of primary ABCs demonstrate a characteristic clonal t(16;17) genetic translocation which can lead to an upregulation of the TRE17/USP6 oncogene [4].

Although benign, an ABC has the potential to grow acutely. Its expansile nature can cause a lot of swelling and pain while disrupting the growth plates. The changes in the bone can also lead to deformity and pathological fractures. It can also cause some neurological manifestations depending upon its location [2]. A distinct solid variant of ABC was first reported by Sanerkin, et al. in 1983 [5]. This type of solid variant could be easily misdiagnosed as a spindle cell tumour, especially osteosarcoma [1].

Symptomatic ABCs are generally treated with surgery. However, asymptomatic ABCs (characterized by clinically insignificant destruction of the bone) are generally left alone with just close monitoring for any abnormal changes [6].

Case presentation

A 16-year-old boy was presented to us with a sudden onset of weakness in both lower limbs leading to paraplegia. He also had a history of back and chest pain over the last one year. A good rectal tone without any perineal anesthesia was noted in the rectal examination and the post-void residual urine volume was negligible. All laboratory findings were within normal range. Plain x-ray showed the collapse of the T5 vertebra (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Radiograph showing collapse of T5 vertebra.

Figure 1

Anteroposterior and lateral view x-ray of the thoracic spine showing pathological fracture and collapse of T5.

CT axial images showed an expansile and lytic lesion in the vertebral body, left pedicle, and transverse process. T2-weighted sagittal and axial MRI T2-weighted images of the thoracic spine showed hyperintense signals in the T5 vertebral body, left pedicle, and transverse process with a pathological fracture (Figure 2).

Figure 2. CT (top left) and MRI (bottom left and right).

Figure 2

Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

A preoperative biopsy was not successful because of the urgent requirement of decompression. The patient was taken to the operating room on an emergency basis with an initial plan of a total en bloc spondylectomy of the T5.

Intraoperatively, histology favored a solid-ABC variant rather than a giant cell tumour. Thus, the initial plan was revised to palliative surgery with a 360˚ decompression (without resecting the body) en bloc via a posterolateral approach as shown in Figure 3. The vertebral column was reconstructed with an expandable titanium cage (inserted via a costotransversectomy approach) and pedicle screw fixation in a 360˚ manner (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Intraoperative anteroposterior and lateral view x-ray of the thoracic spine showing cage and pedicle screw fixation.

Figure 3

Results

After surgery, a complete resolution of sensory and motor functions was achieved. The pain in his chest and back also resolved gradually within a few days. Also, the diseased vertebral body gradually healed and new bone formation was seen at 18 months postoperatively (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Postoperative MRI showing new bone formation at 18 months.

Figure 4

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Discussion

ABCs, although benign, are locally very aggressive and highly vascularised tumours. Generally, post-surgery, it takes a long time to obtain a healing state and new bone formation with a recurrence rate of about 50% [7]. However, Malghem, et al. concluded that spontaneous healing is possible [8].

ABCs are found to have a predilection for the lumbar spine, which was reported by Boriani, et al. [9]. Although CT and MRI scans are the preferred diagnostic methods, a biopsy is the utmost necessary prerequisite for confirming the diagnosis, due to its similarity in appearance with many other bone lesions. The biopsy generally shows proliferating round or oval cells, generally mixed with multinucleated giant cells distributed randomly. It also contains regions of reactive fibroblastic proliferation and microcystic components filled with blood [10].

Depending on the proliferative component, the solid variant of an ABC is often misdiagnosed histologically for other benign or malignant tumour-like bone lesions [1]. The pathological differential diagnosis (solitary bone cyst, giant cell tumour, hemangioma, osteosarcoma, and chondroblastoma) should always be kept in mind while thinking of ABC [10].

The treatment of ABC is also very controversial which includes arterial embolization, curettage with or without bone grafting, complete excision, intralesional drug injections (steroid and calcitonin), and radiation. However, early diagnosis and appropriate surgery play the most important role in the successful management of ABC [10].

Whether surgical management results in a better outcome and lower recurrence rate than other methods (conservative or palliative; for example, curettage alone) remains controversial. Hence, more studies comparing these methods should be conducted.

Conclusions

This case report concludes that an ABC should be kept as a differential diagnosis for tumours involving the spine. Intraoperative frozen sections should always be performed when there is a doubt in mind and in cases of emergencies. An effective spinal decompression and stabilization of the ABC can be achieved by partial or subtotal excision. However, for the successful management of ABC, early diagnosis and appropriate surgical management should be considered.

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained by all participants in this study

References

  • 1.Bertoni F, Bacchini P, Capanna R, Ruggieri P, Biagini R, Ferruzzi A, Bettelli G, Picci P, Campanacci M. Cancer. Vol. 71. Feb: 1993. Solid variant of aneurysmal bone cyst; pp. 729–734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Clayer M. ANZ J Surg. Vol. 78. May: 2008. Injectable form of calcium sulphate as treatment of aneurysmal bone cysts; pp. 366–370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Solitary unicameral bone cyst: with emphasis on the roentgen picture, the pathologic appearance and the pathogenesis. Jaffe HL, Lichtenstein L. Arch Surg. 1942;44:1004–1025. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Recurrent t(16;17)(q22;p13) in aneurysmal bone cysts. Panoutsakopoulos G, Pandis N, Kyriazoglou I, Gustafson P, Mertens F, Mandahl N. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1999;26:265–266. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2264(199911)26:3<265::aid-gcc12>3.0.co;2-#. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.An unusual intraosseous lesion with fibroblastic, osteoclastic, osteoblastic, aneurysmal and fibromyxoid elements. "Solid" variant of aneurysmal bone cyst. Sanerkin NG, Mott MG, Roylance J. Cancer. 1983;51:2278–2286. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19830615)51:12<2278::aid-cncr2820511219>3.0.co;2-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Aneurysmal Bone Cyst. [Apr;2017 ];Tedesco Tedesco. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1254784-overview#a11 2015
  • 7.Aneurysmal bone cysts. A clinicopathological study of 105 cases. Ruiter DJ, van Rijssel TG, van der Velde EA. Cancer. 1977;39:2231–2239. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197705)39:5<2231::aid-cncr2820390541>3.0.co;2-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Malghem J, Maldague B, Esselinckx W, Noel H, De Nayer P, Vincent A. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Vol. 71. Aug: 1989. Spontaneous healing of aneurysmal bone cysts. A report of three cases; pp. 645–650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Aneurysmal bone cyst of the mobile spine: report on 41 cases. Boriani S, De Iure F, Campanacci L, Gasbarrini A, Bandiera S, Biagini R, Bertoni F, Picci P. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:27–35. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200101010-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Aneurysmal bone cyst of spine: a review of literature. Saccomanni B. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008;128:1145–1147. doi: 10.1007/s00402-007-0477-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES