Skip to main content
BJPsych Bulletin logoLink to BJPsych Bulletin
. 2017 Jun;41(3):145–150. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.116.054270

Are men under-treated and women over-treated with antidepressants? Findings from a cross-sectional survey in Sweden

Lena Thunander Sundbom 1,2,, Kerstin Bingefors 1, Kerstin Hedborg 2, Dag Isacson 1
PMCID: PMC5451647  PMID: 28584650

Abstract

Aims and method To examine gender differences in self-reported depression and prescribed antidepressants (ADs). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale was used to assess depression, and information on prescribed ADs was obtained from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register.

Results Depression was reported by 11.7% of the participants (12.3% men and 11.2% women). ADs were prescribed for 7.6% of the participants (5.3% men, 9.8% women). Among men, 1.8% reported depression and used ADs, 10.5% reported depression but did not use ADs, and 3.6% used ADs but did not report depression. The corresponding figures for women were 2.6%, 8.6% and 7.2%.

Clinical implications Men report depression to a greater extent than women but are prescribed ADs to a lesser extent, possibly a sign of under-treatment. Women are prescribed ADs without reporting depression more often than men, possibly a sign of over-treatment. Although the causes remain unclear, diagnostic and treatment guidelines should benefit from considering gender differences in these respects.


Depression is currently considered one of the largest and fastest growing health hazards.1 Although only a small percentage of all those with mental health problems contact healthcare professionals and obtain a diagnosis, depression is one of the most common causes of sick leave and disability.25 Diagnosed depression was relatively unusual 20 years ago, but the incidence has increased remarkably with the introduction of new diagnostic guidelines and antidepressant drugs. What was previously considered psychological distress was then interpreted as a disease, with the risk of over-diagnosis and over-treatment.610 The point prevalence of depression in the general population is now estimated as 3–9%.1,11,12 There is an explicit gender impact on diagnosed depression, with a 2:1 ratio of women/men; about one in four women and one in ten men will develop depression severe enough to require treatment at some time in their lives.1,2,11,12 Moreover, depression may present differently in women and men. Women may be more prone to somatic symptoms of depression, whereas men appear to have more melancholic symptoms and to be more susceptible to drug misuse and aggressive behaviour.1317 To date, however, there is no clear understanding of what causes these gender disparities in depression. They are considered likely to be a combination of several factors: biological, social and behavioural.18,19

Depression is a long-lasting and, if left untreated, often chronic condition. Treatment usually lasts at least 6–12 months, and includes pharmacological therapy with antidepressants (ADs).20 The use of ADs has increased dramatically in recent years.21 According to the national Swedish Prescribed Drug Register (SPDR), almost 9% of the Swedish population was prescribed ADs in 2014, and 65% of these ADs were prescribed for women.22 Similar patterns have been found in other countries.2325 The explanation for this escalation, especially seen in women, remains unclear, but has sometimes been interpreted as a sign of inappropriate use.8,9 Nevertheless, despite the widespread use of ADs, depression has repeatedly been shown to be inadequately treated in the general population. Some studies have found that fewer than one in four patients with depression are prescribed ADs and that the duration of treatment is often shorter than recommended.26,27

The ADs prescribed are primarily selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), although others, for example serotonin–noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), are also used depending on illness severity, the patient's age and various adverse drug reactions.20,28,29 Gender impact has been observed not only on the number of ADs prescribed but also on their type. For example, women are prescribed SSRIs more often than men.30

We examined gender differences in the relationship between self-reported depression and prescribed ADs, in the prevalence of self-reported depression, and in the number and type of prescribed ADs.

Method

Participants

A questionnaire was sent to a random sample (n = 16 000, aged 18–84 years) of the Swedish population (totaling 9.5 million); responses were received from 7725 people (48.3%), as presented in Fig. 1. The study complies with ethical research requirements, as approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Uppsala, Sweden (Dnr 2012/073). Participation in the study was voluntary and information about its purpose was sent out with the questionnaire. Filling in and returning the questionnaire was considered to be equivalent to the respondent giving their agreement to participate in the study.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Study population, responders and non-responders, Sweden 2012/2013.

Assessment of depression and prescribed antidepressants

Self-reported depression was assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).31 Of the 7725 available participants, 7618 (3435 men, 4183 women) filled in the HADS form (Fig. 1) and all analyses were based only on these participants. The HADS was developed to detect patients with high levels of psychological distress and does not include assessment of somatic symptoms. It contains two subscales, one each for anxiety and depression, each consisting of 7 items (score range 0–21) capable of distinguishing between these diagnoses. Higher scores indicate higher levels of psychological distress. Each subscale has three categories based on the score: 0–7 (normal), 8–10 (borderline) and 11–21 (abnormal). In this study, a cut-off level of +8 was used on the depression scale; this level indicates at least mild depression and provides an optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity.32

Information on depression obtained from the HADS was linked (through the participants' identification number, a unique lifetime personal identifier given to all Swedish citizens) to prescription data. Prescribed ADs were obtained from the SPDR, a national register held by the National Board of Health and Welfare, which gathers data on all dispensed prescriptions for patients in ambulatory care from the entire Swedish population.22,33 We collected information on ADs 0–6 months prior to the HADS evaluation. SPDR drugs are classified according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system.34 The ADs (N06A) were categorised as TCAs (N06AA, e.g. amitriptyline, imipramine), SSRIs (N06AB, e.g. citalopram, fluoxetine), ‘others’ (N06AX, including SNRIs (e.g. venlafaxine) and tetracyclic antidepressants (TeCAs, e.g. mirtazapine)), and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs; N06AF, N06AG, e.g. moclobemide). The MAOIs were excluded due to few users.

Analyses

The Statistical Analysis System software (SAS9.2, Cary, North Carolina, USA) was used to perform chi-squared tests (χ2, P) to examine gender differences in the relationship between self-reported depression and prescribed ADs, and in prevalence of self-reported depression, prescribed ADs, and type of ADs prescribed. Logistic regression analysis (odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals) was used to examine gender differences in self-reported depression, controlling for age.

Results

In total, 11.7% of the study population (12.3% men, 11.2% women; χ2, n.s.) was classified as having self-reported depression. Logistic regression analysis showed that the difference between men and women was statistically significant, i.e. men reported depression more often than women (OR 1.226 (CI 1.062–1.414)). According to the SPDR, 7.6% of the study population had been prescribed at least one AD during the 6 months prior to the HADS evaluation. Significantly more women than men were prescribed ADs: 5.3% of the men and 9.8% of the women were prescribed at least one AD (P<0.0001).

Table 1 presents gender differences in the relation between prescribed ADs and self-reported depression in the study population. Among the men, 1.8% reported depression and used ADs, 10.5% reported depression but did not use ADs, and 3.6% used ADs but did not report current depression, while 84.1% were neither depressed nor used ADs. The corresponding figures for women were 2.6%, 8.6%, 7.2% and 81.6%. The gender difference was statistically significant (χ2 P<0.001) in all age groups except the youngest, and was most marked in the groups aged 45–64 and 65–74 years.

Table 1.

Relation between self-reported depression (assessed using the HADS) and prescribed antidepressants (ADs) in the study population (n = 7618), Sweden 2012/2013

Men
Women
Depression
No depression
Depression
No depression
AD-users Non-users AD-users Non-users AD-users Non-users AD-users Non-users

Age (years) n % n % Pa
18–34 593 1.7 8.9 2.0 87.4 831 1.8 9.8 3.6 84.8   N.S.

35–44 475 1.9 11.8 2.3 84.0 576 3.1 8.7 6.8 81.4 <0.01

45–64 1277 1.8 10.6 4.6 82.9 1537 3.3 9.0 8.3 79.4 <0.001

65–74 740 1.5 9.9 3.6 85.0 811 2.1 6.8 9.2 81.9 <0.001

75–84 350 2.3 12.6 3.7 81.4 428 1.9 7.9 7.0 83.2 <0.05

Total 3435 1.8 10.5 3.6 84.1 4183 2.6 8.6 7.2 81.6 <0.001
a.

χ2 analyses comparing men and women.

The participants who had received at least one prescribed AD during the 6 months studied (n = 592: men n = 182, women n = 410) were analysed with respect to the type of AD prescribed (Table 2). SSRIs were the most commonly prescribed ADs for both men (62.8%) and women (71.0%), although women were prescribed them more often than men, particularly in the age group 45–64 years (χ2 P<0.05). By contrast, there was no statistically significant gender difference for the TCAs (men 14.8%, women 10.2%), except for in the age group 45–64 years. Further, men were prescribed ‘other’ ADs (e.g. SNRIs and TeCAs) significantly more often than women (men 39.3%, women 28.1%; χ2 P<0.01).

Table 2.

Types of antidepressant (ATC classification) among participants prescribed at least one antidepressant (n = 592), by age and gender, Sweden 2012/2013

Users, n
SSRIs (N06AB)
TCAs (N06AA)
Others (N06AX)a
Age (years) Total Men Women Men Women Pb Men Women Pb Men Women Pb
18–44 144 42 102 69.1 73.5 NS 9.5 5.9 NS 38.1 29.4 NS

45–64 260 82 178 58.5 71.3 <0.05 20.7 12.4 <0.05 37.8 25.8 <0.05

65–84 188 58 130 64.4 68.5 NS 10.2 10.8 NS 42.4 30.0 <0.05

Total 592 182 410 62.8 71.0 <0.05 14.8 10.2 NS 39.3 28.1 <0.01

ATC, Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical; NS, not significant; SSRIs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; TCAs, tricyclic antidepressants.

a.

For example, serotonin–noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, tetracyclic antidepressants.

b.

χ2 analyses comparing men and women.

Discussion

The present study found that the relationship between self-reported depression and prescribed ADs differs by gender. As in several other studies,26,27 the majority of those who reported depression in our study did not use ADs, and overall, men used ADs to a lesser extent than did women, although they reported depression to a greater extent. This could have been caused by several factors. Many people, especially men, prefer not to seek healthcare.35 Women are clinically diagnosed with depression far more often than men, probably not only because they are more depressed but also because they are more likely to seek healthcare, thus increasing the chance that their depression will be detected.36 Also, diagnostic criteria for depression originate from a female norm and symptoms provided by women, leading to an increased likelihood that depression in women will be diagnosed.15 Depression in men has a different presentation than the classic depressive symptoms more often than in women, and this could lead to men's mental health problems not being recognised and therefore being under-treated.13,35

In contrast to diagnosed depression, previous studies using HADS to assess depression have mostly found no gender differences or, like our study, found a higher prevalence of depression in men.37,38 Since men experience more melancholic symptoms and women more somatic symptoms (e.g. increased appetite and weight, and hypersomnia),1317 the reversed gender differences in depression assessed with HADS compared with clinically diagnosed depression could be due to the fact that HADS's focus is more on melancholic rather than somatic symptoms. Whether the HADS might be more sensitive than other scales in detecting depression in men is as yet unclear.

Other factors that could explain the relatively low use of ADs in our study among the sample with depression might be that the depressed participants may have been reluctant to accept treatment with ADs, a choice that is possibly more common among men; they may not have needed drug treatment, perhaps because other treatments were used (in mild depression psychotherapy is considered as effective as drugs); or they may not have had the prescribed drug dispensed. Many patients do not adhere to treatment instructions, for example do not even obtain their prescribed drugs (primary non-adherence), and prior studies have suggested that both gender and illness severity affect adherence.3942

In our study, it was twice as common for women as for men to use ADs when not currently depressed. This could indicate that their depression was in remission, but it could also mean that women are being over-treated with ADs. Several studies have found AD use to be higher among women, and the increased prescription of ADs in recent decades is especially notable among women.2325,30,43 The higher level of AD prescribing to women may in part be attributed to the greater consumption of healthcare among women in general.36,44 Apropos of this, there are studies that show that women are more likely than men to receive a prescription during their medical visits.45 The lower threshold for prescribing ADs has led to a debate about the possibility of over-prescription or of ADs being sometimes prescribed where alternatives would be better.79 It seems that even mild symptoms are now considered indicative of disease and treated with medications, although the efficacy is often limited in mild to moderate depression.7,46,47 Further, an expanding number of indications (e.g. neuropathic pain, anxiety disorders, eating disorders and sleep disorders) seen more often in women than in men are contributors to the increasing trend to prescribe ADs, and this could explain some of the AD use without depression seen in our study.9,48

As in other studies, the SSRIs were the main drugs in our study.28,30 Because of gender differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ADs, and because depression may present differently in women and men, it has been suggested that men and women could differ in their response to treatment and that pharmacological treatments should therefore be chosen by gender.4951 The women in our study used SSRIs more often than the men. It could be that somatic symptoms respond better to SSRIs than to TCAs. Another cause might be gender differences in adverse drug reactions. However, supporting data are limited and sometimes conflicting, and current treatment guidelines do not take gender into account.49,50,52 Regardless, it is important to continue to examine any differences between men and women concerning pharmacotherapeutic efficacy and adverse drug reactions.

Limitations

The SPDR offers complete data on all dispensed drugs; however, it does not give information on actual usage. Also, ADs during the 6-month period were analysed without distinguishing whether the drugs had been used for a long or a short time. Moreover, ADs are sometimes prescribed for indications other than depression, which we could not control for. However, previous studies have reported that depression remains the main indication for AD use.53 Participation in the study was voluntary and there may have been selection biases. For example, non-responders were more likely to be men than women. It is also possible that people with current symptoms of depression would be less likely to respond, introducing further bias to participant selection. Depression assessed using the HADS (in the previous week) was not directly linked to prescribed ADs via the SPDR (0–6 months prior to the HADS evaluation). However, depression is often a prolonged state, and problems in this respect that were encountered in the previous week were probably not temporary. Finally, it is important to emphasise that a cross-sectional design does not permit evaluation of causality to be derived from the results.

Summary of findings

The relationship between self-reported depression and use of ADs differed by gender. Overall, men were prescribed ADs to a lesser extent than women, although they reported depression to a greater extent. By contrast, women were prescribed ADs without reporting depression more often than men. This may be a sign for under-treatment among men and over-treatment among women. Further, men and women were prescribed different types of ADs, possibly because of gender differences in treatment outcomes and adverse drug reactions. Although the causes of these findings remain unclear, diagnostic and treatment guidelines should benefit from considering gender in these respects.

Footnotes

Declaration of interest None.

References

  • 1. Kessler RC, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Alonso J, Chatterji S, Lee S, Ormel J, et al. The global burden of mental disorders: an update from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) surveys. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc 2009; 18: 23–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Wittchen HU, Kessler RC, Beesdo K, Krause P, Hofler M, Hoyer J. Generalized anxiety and depression in primary care: prevalence, recognition, and management. J Clin Psychiatry 2002; 63 (suppl 8): 24–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Bodlund O. [Anxiety and depression as a hidden problem in primary health care. Only one case in four identified]. Lakartidningen 1997; 94: 4612–4614, 4617–4618. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Lotfi L, Flyckt L, Krakau I, Martensson B, Nilsson GH. Undetected depression in primary healthcare: occurrence, severity and co-morbidity in a two-stage procedure of opportunistic screening. Nord J Psychiatry 2010; 64: 421–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Alonso J, Angermeyer MC, Bernert S, Bruffaerts R, Brugha TS, Bryson H, et al. Use of mental health services in Europe: results from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 2004; 420: 47–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Mayes R, Horwitz AV. DSM-III and the revolution in the classification of mental illness. J Hist Behav Sci 2005; 41: 249–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Horwitz AV. Transforming normality into pathology: the DSM and the outcomes of stressful social arrangements. J Health Soc Behav 2007; 48: 211–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Busfield J. Challenging claims that mental illness has been increasing and mental well-being declining. Soc Sci Med 2012; 75: 581–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Mojtabai R, Olfson M. Proportion of antidepressants prescribed without a psychiatric diagnosis is growing. Health Aff 2011; 30: 1434–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Dowrick C, Frances A. Medicalising unhappiness: new classification of depression risks more patients being put on drug treatment from which they will not benefit. BMJ 2013; 347: f7140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Lejtzen N, Sundquist J, Sundquist K, Li X. Depression and anxiety in Swedish primary health care: prevalence, incidence, and risk factors. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2014; 264: 235–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Alonso J, Angermeyer MC, Bernert S, Bruffaerts R, Brugha TS, Bryson H, et al. Prevalence of mental disorders in Europe: results from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 2004; 420: 21–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Marcus SM, Young EA, Kerber KB, Kornstein S, Farabaugh AH, Mitchell J, et al. Gender differences in depression: findings from the STAR*D study. J Affect Disord 2005; 87: 141–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Alexandrino-Silva C, Wang YP, Carmen Viana M, Bulhoes RS, Martins SS, Andrade LH. Gender differences in symptomatic profiles of depression: results from the Sao Paulo Megacity Mental Health Survey. J Affect Disord 2013; 147: 355–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Martin LA, Neighbors HW, Griffith DM. The experience of symptoms of depression in men vs women: analysis of the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. JAMA Psychiatry 2013; 70: 1100–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Hildebrandt MG, Stage KB, Kragh-Soerensen P. Gender differences in severity, symptomatology and distribution of melancholia in major depression. Psychopathology 2003; 36: 204–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Silverstein B, Edwards T, Gamma A, Ajdacic-Gross V, Rossler W, Angst J. The role played by depression associated with somatic symptomatology in accounting for the gender difference in the prevalence of depression. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2013; 48: 257–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Klose M, Jacobi F. Can gender differences in the prevalence of mental disorders be explained by sociodemographic factors? Arch Womens Ment Health 2004; 7: 133–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Hyde JS, Mezulis AH, Abramson LY. The ABCs of depression: integrating affective, biological, and cognitive models to explain the emergence of the gender difference in depression. Psychol Rev 2008; 115: 291–313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Gelenberg AJ. A review of the current guidelines for depression treatment. J Clin Psychiatry 2010; 71: e15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Abbing-Karahagopian V, Huerta C, Souverein PC, de Abajo, Leufkens HG, Slattery J, et al. Antidepressant prescribing in five European countries: application of common definitions to assess the prevalence, clinical observations, and methodological implications. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2014; 70: 849–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Wettermark B, Hammar N, Fored CM, Leimanis A, Otterblad Olausson P, Bergman U, et al. The new Swedish Prescribed Drug Register – opportunities for pharmacoepidemiological research and experience from the first six months. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2007; 16: 726–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Ohayon MM, Lader MH. Use of psychotropic medication in the general opulation of France, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. J Clin Psychiatry 2002; 63: 817–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Noordam R, Aarts N, Verhamme KM, Sturkenboom MC, Stricker BH, Visser LE. Prescription and indication trends of antidepressant drugs in the Netherlands between 1996 and 2012: a dynamic population-based study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2015; 71: 369–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Boyd A, Van de Velde S, Pivette M, ten Have M, Florescu S, O'Neill S, et al. Gender differences in psychotropic use across Europe: Results from a large cross-sectional, population-based study. Eur Psychiatry 2015; 30: 778–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Henriksson S, Asplund R, Boethius G, Hallstrom T, Isacsson G. Infrequent use of antidepressants in depressed individuals (an interview and prescription database study in a defined Swedish population 2001–2002). Eur Psychiatry 2006; 21: 355–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Demyttenaere K, Bruffaerts R, Posada-Villa J, Gasquet I, Kovess V, Lepine JP, et al. Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. JAMA 2004; 291: 2581–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Bauer M, Monz BU, Montejo AL, Quail D, Dantchev N, Demyttenaere K, et al. Prescribing patterns of antidepressants in Europe: results from the Factors Influencing Depression Endpoints Research (FINDER) study. Eur Psychiatry 2008; 23: 66–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. MacGillivray S, Arroll B, Hatcher S, Ogston S, Reid I, Sullivan F, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors compared with tricyclic antidepressants in depression treated in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2003; 326: 1014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. NOMESCO Medicines Consumption in the Nordic Countries 2004–2008. Nordic Medico Statistical Committee, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67: 361–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res 2002; 52: 69–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Wettermark B, Zoega H, Furu K, Korhonen M, Hallas J, Norgaard M, et al. The Nordic prescription databases as a resource for pharmacoepidemiological research – a literature review. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2013; 22: 691–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. World Health Organization Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment. WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Hirshbein L. Challenges to diagnosis and treatment of depression in men. MD Advis 2012; 5: 24–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Kovess-Masfety V, Boyd A, van de Velde S, de Graaf R, Vilagut G, Haro JM, et al. Are there gender differences in service use for mental disorders across countries in the European Union? Results from the EU-World Mental Health survey. J Epidemiol Community Health 2014; 68: 649–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Breeman S, Cotton S, Fielding S, Jones GT. Normative data for the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Qual Life Res 2015; 24: 391–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Crawford JR, Henry JD, Crombie C, Taylor EP. Normative data for the HADS from a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol 2001; 40: 429–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Thunander Sundbom L, Bingefors K. Women and men report different behaviours in, and reasons for medication non-adherence: a nationwide Swedish survey. Pharm Pract 2012; 10: 207–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Thunander Sundbom L, Bingefors K. The influence of symptoms of anxiety and depression on medication nonadherence and its causes: a population based survey of prescription drug users in Sweden. Patient Prefer Adherence 2013; 7: 805–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. DiMatteo MR, Lepper HS, Croghan TW. Depression is a risk factor for noncompliance with medical treatment: meta-analysis of the effects of anxiety and depression on patient adherence. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 2101–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Bulloch AG, Patten SB. Non-adherence with psychotropic medications in the general population. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2010; 45: 47–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Simoni-Wastila L. Gender and psychotropic drug use. Med Care 1998; 36: 88–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Owens GM. Gender differences in health care expenditures, resource utilization, and quality of care. J Manag Care Pharm 2008; 14 (suppl 3): 2–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Skoog J, Midlov P, Beckman A, Sundquist J, Halling A. Drugs prescribed by general practitioners according to age, gender and socioeconomic status after adjustment for multimorbidity level. BMC Fam Pract 2014; 15: 183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Moynihan R, Doust J, Henry D. Preventing overdiagnosis: how to stop harming the healthy. BMJ 2012; 344: e3502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Fournier JC, DeRubeis RJ, Hollon SD, Dimidjian S, Amsterdam JD, Shelton RC, et al. Antidepressant drug effects and depression severity: a patient-level meta-analysis. JAMA 2010; 303: 47–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Mercier A, Auger-Aubin I, Lebeau JP, Schuers M, Boulet P, Hermil JL, et al. Evidence of prescription of antidepressants for non-psychiatric conditions in primary care: an analysis of guidelines and systematic reviews. BMC Fam Pract 2013; 14: 55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Keers R, Aitchison KJ. Gender differences in antidepressant drug response. Int Rev Psychiatry 2010; 22: 485–500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Young AH. Gender differences in treatment response to antidepressants. Br J Psychiatry 2001; 179: 561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Cochran SV, Rabinovitz FE. Gender-sensitive recommendations for assessment and treatment of depression in men. Prof Psych Res Pract 2003; 34: 132–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Quitkin FM, Stewart JW, McGrath PJ, Taylor BP, Tisminetzky MS, Petkova E, et al. Are there differences between women's and men's antidepressant responses? Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159: 1848–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Henriksson S, Boethius G, Hakansson J, Isacsson G. Indications for and outcome of antidepressant medication in a general population: a prescription database and medical record study, in Jamtland county, Sweden, 1995. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2003; 108: 427–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BJPsych Bulletin are provided here courtesy of Royal College of Psychiatrists

RESOURCES