Abstract
Symbiodinium are responsible for the majority of primary production in coral reefs and found in a mutualistic symbiosis with multiple animal phyla. However, little is known about the molecular signals involved in the establishment of this symbiosis and whether it initiates during host larval development. To address this question, we monitored the expression of a putative symbiosis-specific gene (H+-ATPase) in Symbiodinium A1 ex hospite and in association with larvae of a scleractinian coral (Mussismilia hispida), a nudibranch (Berghia stephanieae) and a giant clam (Tridacna crocea). We acquired broodstock for each host, induced spawning and cultured the larvae. Symbiodinium cells were offered and larval samples taken for each host during the first 72 h after symbiont addition. In addition, control samples including free-living Symbiodinium and broodstock tissue containing symbionts for each host were collected. RNA extraction and RT-PCR were performed and amplified products cloned and sequenced. Our results show that H+-ATPase was expressed in Symbiodinium associated with coral and giant clam larvae, but not with nudibranch larvae, which digested the symbionts. Broodstock tissue for coral and giant clam also expressed H+-ATPase, but not the nudibranch tissue sample. Our results of the expression of H+-ATPase as a marker gene suggest that symbiosis between Symbiodinium and M. hispida and T. crocea is established during host larval development. Conversely, in the case of B. stephanieae larvae, evidence does not support a mutualistic relationship. Our study supports the utilization of H+-ATPase expression as a marker for assessing Symbiodinium–invertebrate relationships with applications for the differentiation of symbiotic and non-symbiotic associations. At the same time, insights from a single marker gene approach are limited and future studies should direct the identification of additional symbiosis-specific genes, ideally from both symbiont and host.
Keywords: zooxanthellae, Tridacna, scleractinia, sea slug, larval ecology, ATPase
1. Introduction
Coral reefs are marine coastal environments found in tropical areas, noted for their remarkable biodiversity [1]. This diversity is supported by the complexity of habitats created by the CaCO3 structure produced by reef-building corals [2] and by the high primary production performed by symbiotic dinoflagellates, also called zooxanthellae [3–5]. These dinoflagellates (genus Symbiodinium) are found in an endosymbiotic association with multiple metazoan and protist phyla [6], being harboured inside the host tissues at high densities, typically 1010 cells per m2 of coral reef [7].
Before the widespread availability of mainstream molecular biology techniques, a single species of zooxanthella had been described (Symbiodinium microadriaticum) and considered pandemic [8,9]. However, through phylogenetic analyses combining ribosomal (nuclear), chloroplast and mitochondrial genes [10–12], Symbiodinium dinoflagellates have been proposed to be categorized in nine clades, A–I [13]. Current efforts are concentrating on the formal description of species within the clades [14–16]. Each clade tends to associate with a particular selection of hosts [7,17,18], and in cases of acquisition of heterologous clades, the host typically displays reduced fitness and growth [19–20].
The symbiosis between Symbiodinium and their hosts is mutualistic. In exchange for protection, CO2, nitrogen and phosphorus [21–23], Symbiodinium supplies the host with several organic compounds, including glycerol, glucose, fatty acids and amino acids [24], which may contribute to more than 90% of metabolic requirements of the host [25]. While this metabolite exchange is known for adult hosts, there is scarcity of information for the relationship between Symbiodinium and hosts still in their larval stages. The majority of zooxanthellate organisms acquire their symbionts horizontally [26–28], but it is still unknown when and if metabolite exchange initiates during larval development, which may have a crucial impact on the recruitment of coral reef organisms. In addition to these considerations, metabolite exchange and molecular signals are important to ascertain whether a mutualism is in place. Recent studies have sequenced genes in cnidarians that may be symbiosis-specific markers [29–31], but are yet to be tested. While Symbiodinium genomes for types within clades A, B and F have been sequenced recently [32–34], only a single symbiosis-specific marker has been suggested to date. This marker is the H+-ATPase, a proton pump that transports cations across the cell membrane [35,36] and that is only expressed by Symbiodinium engaged in the mutualistic symbiosis [37]. This has been experimentally confirmed comprehensively by Bertucci et al. [37] and validated by Mies et al. [38]. At present, this gene has only been characterized for Symbiodinium A1 [37] and it seems to be little conserved among clades, with a variation in the amount and size of introns, making it more difficult to detect and amplify for Symbiodinium species belonging to other clades (M. Mies 2015, unpublished data).
In order to better understand the symbiotic relationship between Symbiodinium and coral reef larvae and to assess the general suitability of H+-ATPase as a symbiosis marker, we investigated H+-ATPase expression by Symbiodinium when associated with larvae of three different hosts: (i) Mussismilia hispida, a scleractinian coral; (ii) Berghia stephanieae, a nudibranch and (iii) Tridacna crocea, a giant clam. By investigating these relationships we hope to not only determine whether and when the mutualistic relationship between these organisms is established during larval development, but also to increase our current understanding of coral reef larval ecology, with potential implications for recruitment and dispersal.
2. Material and methods
The experiment was designed with the purpose of amplifying the H+-ATPase in Symbiodinium associated with coral, slug and clam larvae. Therefore, we cultured Symbiodinium, spawned and cultured the offspring of the three hosts, offered the cultured Symbiodinium, took samples periodically, performed RNA extraction, RT-PCR, cloning and sequencing.
2.1. Symbiodinium culture
Symbiodinium cells (ITS2 type A1) were cultured using the f/2 medium [39], at a temperature of 23°C and a photon flux of 100 µE m−2 s−1 with a photoperiod of 12 L : 12D. The antibiotics penicillin and streptomycin were added together with the culture medium, at a final concentration of 1.0 and 0.5 g l−1, respectively.
2.2. Broodstock maintenance and spawning
The Symbiodinium hosts selected for this experiment (table 1) were M. hispida, a reef-building coral endemic to Brazil with a latitudinal distribution of 2500 km [43]; the stenophagous nudibranch B. stephanieae (formerly known as Aeolidiella stephanieae and often mistaken for Berghia verrucicornis) that feeds exclusively on zooxanthellate anemones of the genus Aiptasia [41]; and the smallest species of giant clams, T. crocea. All of these hosts naturally house Symbiodinium strains belonging to clade A and all of them acquire symbionts horizontally [41,44,45]. All organisms were kept under conditions that simulated tropical reef waters, i.e. temperature at 27°C, specific gravity at 1024 kg m−3 and nutrient concentrations near zero. Thirty M. hispida colonies (17.5 ± 3.5 cm in approximate diameter) were collected at the Recife de Fora (16°25′ S, 38°59′ W), near the Abrolhos Reefs in northeastern Brazil. Colonies were kept in semi-closed nursery tanks and naturally spawned gamete bundles containing both spermatozoa and oocytes were collected immediately after release. Bundles were dispersed and oocytes fertilized in 60 l tubs and kept for 4 days until planulae had open digestive tracts. Water changes of 90% were performed daily and strong aeration was provided in order to keep the extremely buoyant eggs from becoming trapped in the surface tension. One hundred and thirty broodstock individuals of B. stephanieae (1.7 ± 0.3 cm in length) were kept in two 60 l black round tubs in a recirculating aquaria system of 250 l. They were fed 250 individuals of the glass anemone, Aiptasia sp. (harbouring Symbiodinium A1) and egg masses spawned overnight were collected the next morning. Embryos were then kept for 10 days under strong aeration in order to stimulate the release of veliger larvae [41]. Finally, 10 T. crocea broodstock individuals (7.6 ± 0.9 cm in shell length) were maintained in a 350 l recirculating system for 3 months in order to stimulate gamete production [40,46]. They were then induced to spawn with an intragonadal injection of 1.0 ml of a serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 1.0 g l−1) solution [47–49]. Fertilization was performed according to Heslinga et al. [50] and eggs and, subsequently, trochophore larvae were kept in 60 l black round tubs for 3 days until all larvae attained the veliger stage. Water changes of 50% were performed daily.
Table 1.
Ecological aspects of the three Symbiodinium hosts used in this experiment, including their range distribution, spawning mode, larval size, and mode, stages and total duration of larval development (according to [40–42]). Larval stages in bold denote the stages used in this experiment, at 4, 10 and 3 days post-fertilization, respectively.
| host organism | distribution | spawning mode | larvae size at hatching (µm) | larval development mode | stages of larval development | larval development duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mussismilia hispida (Scleractinia) | tropical Brazil | broadcast spawner | ≈300 | lecithotrophic | planula | ≈12 days |
| Berghia stephanieae (Gastropoda) | Gulf of Mexico | benthic spawner | ≈200 | facultative planktotrophic | veliger | 1–2 days |
| Tridacna crocea (Bivalvia) | tropical Indo-Pacific | broadcast spawner | ≈95 | planktotrophic | trochophore, veliger and pediveliger | ≈17 days |
2.3. Larval cultures, Symbiodinium offering and sampling
For each host, larvae were placed in three (replicates) 1.2 l plankton kreisels kept in water baths at 27°C. Mussismilia hispida planulae were stocked at 0.8 larva ml−1, B. stephanieae veligers at 1.0 ml−1 and T. crocea veligers at 2.0 ml−1. Symbiodinium A1 was then offered at a final concentration of 103 cells ml−1 to all kreisels. At 11 h post-symbiont offering (PSO), a water change of 100% was performed in all kreisels in order to remove Symbiodinium cells that had not been acquired. Symbiont acquisition was recorded at this point. Samples of 50, 50 and 250 larvae were taken for M. hispida, B. stephanieae and T. crocea, respectively, at 0, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h PSO. As a positive control for the expression of H+-ATPase, tissue (containing symbionts) was retrieved from adult individuals of each host. To confirm that cultured (free-living) Symbiodinium do not express H+-ATPase, a sample containing 1.0 × 106 cells was obtained. Samples were snap-frozen immediately after collection and kept at −80°C until RNA extraction (see below).
2.4. Primer design
In order to confirm the identity of the Symbiodinium culture we amplified the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2), using primers designed by LaJeunesse and Trench [51]. Two Symbiodinium genes were targeted for this experiment, H+-ATPase (Enzyme Commission number 3.6.3.6) and RuBisCO (Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase oxygenase, EC number 4.1.1.39), with the latter chosen as a positive control. Primers for H+-ATPase (5′-GCACTTCTTGGGCTTGCTGC-3′ and 5′-ATCTTCCGGGACTCCACCAC-3′) were designed in adjacent regions of two conserved amino acids motifs that are diagnostic for this protein [52], the ATP phosphorylation site (DKTGTLT) and the ATP binding site (TGDGVND). The design was based on conserved regions from the alignment of several sequences obtained from transcriptomes and expressed sequence tags of multiple Symbiodinium clades and other dinoflagellates [53–61]. The RuBisCO primers (5′-ACCGGCGTGGGCAAGCTGTTCTCT-3′ and 5′-TGGGAGTGGTCTGCTTCATG-3′) were taken from Bertucci et al. [37].
2.5. RNA extraction and RT-PCR reaction
Total RNA was extracted from all samples, including the cultured Symbiodinium and the tissues from coral, nudibranch and giant clam broodstock. Samples were macerated with a mortar and a pestle, and TriReagent (Ambion) was used for the extraction with modifications suggested in Rosic and Hoegh-Guldberg [62]. Extracted RNA was then treated with the Turbo-DNA-Free kit (Ambion) and the cDNA was generated using the SuperScript First Strand Synthesis III kit (Invitrogen). Approximately 50 ng of cDNA was used in the RT-PCR in a reaction volume of 25 µl, with final concentrations of 2.0 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 0.15 mM for both forward and reverse primers and 0.04 units µl−1 of GoTaq DNA polymerase (Promega). Cycling conditions for H+-ATPase and RuBisCO were the following: 3 min at 94°C, 35 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 54°C and 1.5 min at 72°C, and termination at 72°C for 5 min. Cycling conditions for the ITS2 were according to LaJeunesse and Trench [51].
2.6. Cloning and sequencing
The amplicons produced were separated on 0.8% agarose, band-purified using the Nucleospin Extract II kit (Macherey-Nagel) and ligated into pGEM T-Easy vector (Promega). Vectors were transformed into electrocompetent cells (DH10B) according to standard practices described in Sambrook et al. [63]. Plasmid minipreparations, also according to Sambrook et al. [63], were performed for each RT-PCR reaction and sequenced on a 3130XI sequencer using T7 vector primer.
2.7. Phylogenetic analysis
Nucleotide sequences related to both H+-ATPase and RuBisCO sequences produced in this experiment were retrieved from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) using the BLAST algorithm [64]. Maximum-likelihood phylogenies for both genes were generated in MEGA5 [65] using the optimal model of nucleotide substitution (default settings) and a bootstrap of 1000 replicates.
3. Results
More than 99% of all host larvae acquired symbionts. The number of symbionts acquired varied greatly among hosts. Symbiont acquisition per planula larva of M. hispida was 194.5 ± 31.6 cells, while B. stephanieae and T. crocea veligers acquired 19.2 ± 5.0 and 36.6 ± 6.5 cells, respectively. Tridacna crocea veligers kept the symbionts in the digestive tract throughout the duration of the experiment, while M. hispida planulae seemed to move them from the gastrovascular cavity to different areas in the endoderm (figure 1). Stereomicroscopic observations showed that B. stephanieae larvae digested the symbionts (Symbiodinium cells were degraded, presented ruptured walls and missing or deformed organelles) and did not move them to specialized tissues or cells. Many B. stephanieae individuals underwent metamorphosis after 48 h PSO and all of them had become juveniles at 72 h PSO.
Figure 1.
Host broodstock and larvae used in the experiment. (a) Mussismilia hispida colonies collected at Recife de Fora, (b) Berghia stephanieae spawning individuals (note brownish area in the cerata, harbouring Symbiodinium cells captured from the anemone Aiptasia sp.), (c) Tridacna crocea broodstock clam, (d) Mussismilia hispida planula after acquiring multiple Symbiodinium A1 cells, (e) Berghia stephanieae veliger larvae immediately before hatching and (f) Tridacna crocea veliger larva with Symbiodinium A1 cells inside the digestive tract.
The ITS2 amplification confirmed that the Symbiodinium cells belonged to type A1. The amplicons produced for H+-ATPase and RuBisCO genes had a size of 460 and 430 bp, respectively (GenBank accession numbers KY483989-997). The BLAST searches and phylogenetic trees (figure 2) confirmed that the sequences obtained belong to Symbiodinium A1. All H+-ATPase and RuBisCO sequences obtained were 99 and 100% identical in pairwise comparisons, respectively. Phylogenetic analyses (figure 2) and BLAST results confirm that the targeted genes were amplified and belonged to Symbiodinium A1. The H+-ATPase sequences were 99% identical to Symbiodinium A1 (GenBank accession number FJ807389) and RuBisCO sequences were 95% identical to Symbiodinium (GenBank accession number JX465541).
Figure 2.
Phylogeny of (a) H+-ATPase and (b) RuBisCO genes of Symbiodinium A1 in this experiment. Trees were constructed using maximum-likelihood analysis and 1000 bootstrap replicates; only values above 70 are shown. Accession numbers are from the NCBI database.
Free-living Symbiodinium, as expected, did not express the H+-ATPase. Broodstock tissue containing symbionts from both M. hispida and T. crocea did express the H+-ATPase, while tissue from B. stephanieae did not. Out of the three replicated larval cultures for M. hispida, the H+-ATPase gene was expressed in only one replicate, at 72 h PSO (table 2). This gene was not expressed by any B. stephaniae larval replicates, at any time. For T. crocea, one of the replicates expressed the H+-ATPase at 24, 48 and 72 h PSO, the second replicate only at 24 and 72 h PSO and the third replicate did not express the gene. The RuBisCO gene was expressed for all broodstock tissue and larval samples, as well as for the free-living Symbiodinium in culture.
Table 2.
Expression of H+-ATPase by Symbiodinium A1 acquired by Mussismilia hispida (scleractinian coral), Berghia stephanieae (nudibranch) and Tridacna crocea (giant clam) larvae over 72 h after acquisition. Expression for cultured Symbiodinium A1 (free-living) and tissue of host broodstock was also monitored. All samples exhibited expression of RuBisCO (positive control). +, positive expression; −, no expression; n.a., not applicable.
| Sample | Control samples | 0 h | 12 h | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Symbiodinium A1 culture | − | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
| Mussismilia hispida | ||||||
| broodstock tissue | + | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
| larvae replicate 1 | n.a. | − | − | − | − | − |
| larvae replicate 2 | n.a. | − | − | − | − | + |
| larvae replicate 3 | n.a. | − | − | − | − | − |
| Berghia stephanieae | ||||||
| broodstock tissue | − | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
| larvae replicate 1 | n.a. | − | − | − | − | − |
| larvae replicate 2 | n.a. | − | − | − | − | − |
| larvae replicate 3 | n.a. | − | − | − | − | − |
| Tridacna crocea | ||||||
| broodstock tissue | + | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
| larvae replicate 1 | n.a. | − | − | + | + | + |
| larvae replicate 2 | n.a. | − | − | + | − | + |
| larvae replicate 3 | n.a. | − | − | − | − | − |
4. Discussion
The establishment of a mutualistic symbiosis is a process that requires the successful completion of many steps, such as symbiont acquisition, transfer to specialized cells/tissues, metabolite and/or favour exchange and long-term persistence [66]. However, very little is known about the biochemical and molecular mechanisms involved in the establishment of this relationship. The only difference reported thus far is the expression of H+-ATPase, a symbiosis-specific gene [37]. Arguably having multiple marker genes would strengthen the here-conducted study and further support our conclusions. In particular, it would be valuable to have symbiosis marker genes for the symbiont and host. However, although a number of studies have investigated differential expression in marine invertebrate hosts with and without Symbiodinium [30,67–71], few have attempted to suggest symbiosis marker genes that can be reliably used to assess symbiotic states. Consequently, we focused on assessing H+-ATPase as an indicator for establishment of a symbiosis relationship. This gene was only found to be expressed in symbiotic relationships as shown by Bertucci et al. [37] and validated by Mies et al. [38]. The protein coded for by the H+-ATPase is responsible for several reactions, particularly in generating proton gradients across the plasma membrane and dehydrating HCO3− [22,35,72]. This gene is also present in other photosynthetic eukaryotes such as the angiosperm Arabidopsis thaliana [73] and the planktonic green alga Platymonas viridis [74]. While many studies have observed symbiont acquisition by metazoan larvae [19,27,30,75–80], very few tested metabolite exchange or symbiosis-specific molecular signals [38,81]. For that purpose, we decided to investigate whether larvae of several marine invertebrate coral reef taxa express H+-ATPase as a result of Symbiodinium acquisition.
While only few and nearly undetectable differences were found in comparative analyses of the transcriptomes of symbiotic and aposymbiotic coral larvae [68,70,71], we did find expression of H+-ATPase in Symbiodinium acquired by the larvae of the coral M. hispida. This expression was found in only one of the triplicates, at 72 h PSO, however. We argue that monitoring the expression of this gene for a longer period of time during the larval development would probably give a broader view on the establishment of this mutualistic symbiosis. Nevertheless, our results do show that Symbiodinium A1 and coral larvae may engage in symbiosis. In particular, these findings relate to reports that Symbiodinium A1 acquired by M. hispida larvae produce a higher amount of fatty acids and present lower bleaching rates than most of the other Symbiodinium clades [82,83].
The nudibranch B. stephanieae is a valuable product in the marine ornamental trade [84]. In our experiments with this species, the expression of H+-ATPase was not detected in any of the larval samples, and, more importantly, neither in the broodstock tissue sample. In fact, host larvae were digesting the symbionts. Despite evidence that Symbiodinium engages in a mutualistic relationship and translocates photosynthetically fixed carbon to the nudibranch Pteraeolidia ianthina [85], this does not seem to be the case for B. stephanieae. While adult specimens do host Symbiodinium cells in the cerata, there is much evidence against mutualism in the case of this species, especially from the Symbiodinium perspective: B. stephanieae are nocturnal organisms and remove the symbionts from the Aiptasia anemone (which is found in sunlit areas) and later defecates the non-motile Symbiodinium cysts after 3–6 days from acquisition [86]. This not only deprives Symbiodinium of light, but also renders it an easy prey in the benthos. Furthermore, it has been reported that some nudibranchs sequester Symbiodinium from their prey, but may not engage in symbiosis [87,88]. Therefore, the association between B. stephanieae and Symbiodinium does not seem to fit the requirements for a mutualistic symbiosis. Regardless, this example supports that the expression of H+-ATPase is not an endocytosis signal.
In the case of T. crocea, an important commodity for both the food and aquarium trade [89], many studies based on morphological examinations suggested that symbiosis was not established until metamorphosis [27,90], when symbionts migrated to post-metamorphic diverticulae called zooxanthellal tubular system [91]. However, studies show that veliger larvae grow faster and have increased survival if symbionts are available [27,45]. Our results show that Symbiodinium cells in two of the three replicates of T. crocea larvae expressed H+-ATPase, in agreement with the findings of Mies et al. [38] for T. maxima. Similarly to that reported for coral larvae, Symbiodinium acquired by T. crocea veliger also seem to produce more fatty acids and to be more resistant to bleaching [82,83]. However, the expression of H+-ATPase was intermittent for one of the replicates (table 2). While there is very little information available in the literature to explain why this would happen, we argue it may be related to the significant changes associated with the circadian rhythm in Symbiodinium and other dinoflagellates, which include variations in metabolite production, gene expression, behaviour and morphology [92–94]. Nonetheless, this event reinforces that modulation of the expression H+-ATPase requires further investigation.
It is important to note that the host organisms selected for this experiment, and particularly their larval ecology, are very different (table 1). Scleractinian coral larvae are known lecithotrophs and go through metamorphosis without any exogenous feeding [95], while giant clam veligers are planktotrophs and must feed before attaining the juvenile stage [27,45,96]. Based on H+-ATPase expression, our findings argue that giant clam larvae establish symbiosis with Symbiodinium earlier than coral larvae, which could point to their higher need of exogenous nutrition. While the nudibranchs also produce lecithotrophic larvae, they are facultative planktotrophs and Symbiodinium seems to be more of a prey item than a symbiont, as H+-ATPase was never expressed and Symbiodinium cells were digested.
While our experiments may contribute to the knowledge on the state of the symbiotic relationship between Symbiodinium and coral reef larvae by means of H+-ATPase expression, there is still an overwhelming lack of marker genes for Symbiodinium. This hinders functional genomics studies [97]. Investigating comparative differential gene expression in the free-living and coccoid (symbiotic) stages is crucial for further understanding the relationships between coral reef organisms and their symbionts. As an example, the expression of H+-ATPase may be tied to the non-motile coccoid life stage of Symbiodinium. Interestingly, the shift from free-living to coccoid stage has been shown to be chemically stimulated by lectin produced by the coral host [98]. Regardless, our results support the application of H+-ATPase gene expression as a molecular symbiosis-specific marker for Symbodinium–invertebrate associations. This gene may be used for distinguishing between symbiotic and non-symbiotic associations (e.g. the case of the nudibranch B. stephanieae). Our findings may also provide insights for coral reef restoration and aquaculture protocols [99,100], as early symbiont acquisition and mutualism establishment may improve survival and metamorphic competence.
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our most sincere thanks to Gustavo Duarte and the whole Coral Vivo Institute staff, Acqua Distribuidora for supplying giant clam broodstock, Diego Castillo for his technical assistance and Arthur Tenório for helping us run the cultures. Finally, we greatly thank the Genomes and Transposable Elements Laboratory for providing infrastructure and technical assistance in the experiments.
Data accessibility
All the sequences produced in this article were deposited in the GenBank database, under accession numbers KY483989--997.
Authors' contributions
M.M. designed the experiment, M.M. performed the experiment, C.R.V., C.B.C., D.O.P. and E.N.C. contributed with infrastructure/material/technical support, M.M. analyzed the data and M.M., C.R.V. and P.Y.G.S. wrote the manuscript. All authors gave final approval for publication.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Funding
This work was supported by Projeto Coral Vivo and sponsored by Petrobras and Arraial d'Ajuda Eco Parque. PYGS acknowledges grant nos. 302526/2012-9 and 2010/20350-8 from CNPq and FAPESP.
References
- 1.Sheppard CRC, Davy SK, Pilling GM (eds). 2009. The biology of coral reefs. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kleypas JA, Yates KK. 2009. Coral reefs and ocean acidification. Oceanography 22, 108–117. (doi:10.5670/oceanog.2009.101) [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cesar HS. 2000. Coral reefs: their functions, threats and economical value. In Collected essays on the economics of coral reefs (ed. Cesar HS.), pp. 14–39. Kalmar, Sweden: CORDIO. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hatcher BG. 1988. Coral reef primary productivity: a beggar's banquet. Trends Ecol. Evol. 3, 106–111. (doi:10.1016/0169-5347(88)90117-6) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Roth M. 2014. The engine of the reef: photobiology of the coral-algal symbiosis. Front Microbiol. 5, 422 (doi:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00422) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Stat M, Carter D, Hoegh-Guldberg O. 2006. The evolutionary history of Symbiodinium and scleractinian hosts---symbiosis, diversity, and the effect of climate change. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Systematics 8, 23–43. (doi:10.1016/j.ppees.2006.04.001) [Google Scholar]
- 7.Baker AC. 2003. Flexibility and specificity in coral-algal symbiosis: diversity, ecology, and biogeography of Symbiodinium. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Systematics 34, 661–689. (doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132417) [Google Scholar]
- 8.Taylor DL. 1974. Symbiotic marine algae: taxonomy and biological fitness. In Symbiosis in the sea (ed. Vernberg WB.), pp. 245–262. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Freudenthal HD. 1962. Symbiodinium gen. nov. and Symbiodinium microadriaticum sp. nov., a zooxanthella: taxonomy, life cycle, and morphology. J. Protozool. 9, 45–52. (doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.1962.tb02579.x) [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pochon X, Putnam HM, Gates RD. 2014. Multi-gene analysis of Symbiodinium dinoflagellates: a perspective on rarity, symbiosis, and evolution. PeerJ 2, e394 (doi:10.7717/peerj.394) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.LaJeunesse TC. 2001. Investigating the biodiversity, ecology, and phylogeny of endosymbiotic dinoflagellates in the genus Symbiodinium using the ITS region: in search of a ‘species’ level marker. J. Phycol. 37, 866–880. (doi:10.1046/j.1529-8817.2001.01031.x) [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rowan R, Powers DA. 1991. Molecular genetic identification of symbiotic dinoflagellates (zooxanthellae). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 71, 65–73. (doi:10.3354/meps071065) [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pochon X, Gates RD. 2010. A new Symbiodinium clade (Dinophyceae) from soritid foraminifera in Hawai'i. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 56, 492–497. (doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2010.03.040) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lee SY, Jeong HJ, Kang NS, Jang TY, Jang SH, LaJeunesse TC. 2015. Symbiodinium tridacnidorum sp. nov., a dinoflagellate common to Indo-Pacific giant clams, and a revised morphological description of Symbiodinium microadriaticum Freudenthal, emended Trench & Blank. Eur. J. Phycol. 50, 155–172. (doi:10.1080/09670262.2015.1018336) [Google Scholar]
- 15.LaJeunesse TC, Parkinson JE, Reimer JD. 2012. A genetics-based description of Symbiodinium minutum sp. nov. and S. psygmophilum sp. nov. (dinophyceae), two dinoflagellates symbiotic with cnidaria. J. Phycol. 48, 1380–1391. (doi:10.1111/j.1529-8817.2012.01217.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hume BCC, Angelo CD, Smith EG, Stevens JR, Burt J, Wiedenmann J. 2015. Symbiodinium thermophilum sp. nov., a thermotolerant symbiotic alga prevalent in corals of the world's hottest sea, the Persian/Arabian Gulf. Sci. Rep. 5, 8562 (doi:10.1038/srep08562) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Coffroth MA, Santos SR. 2005. Genetic diversity of symbiotic dinoflagellates in the genus Symbiodinium. Protist 156, 19–34. (doi:10.1016/j.protis.2005.02.004) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Goulet TL. 2006. Most corals may not change their symbionts. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 321, 1–7. (doi:10.3354/meps321001) [Google Scholar]
- 19.Weis VM, Reynolds WS, DeBoer MD, Krupp DA. 2001. Host-symbiont specificity during onset of symbiosis between the dinoflagellates Symbiodinium spp. and planula larvae of the scleractinian coral Fungia scutaria. Coral Reefs 20, 301–308. (doi:10.1007/s003380100179) [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rodriguez-Lanetty M. 2003. Evolving lineages of Symbiodinium-like dinoflagellates based on ITS1 rDNA. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 28, 152–168. (doi:10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00033-2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Trench RK. 1979. The cell biology of plant–animal symbiosis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 30, 485–531. (doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.30.060179.002413) [Google Scholar]
- 22.Allemand D, Furla P, Bénazet-Tambutté S. 1998. Mechanisms of carbon acquisition for endosymbiont photosynthesis in Anthozoa. Can. J. Bot. 76, 925–941. (doi:10.1139/b98-086) [Google Scholar]
- 23.Leggat W, Buck BH, Grice A, Yellowlees D. 2003. The impact of bleaching on the metabolic contribution of dinoflagellate symbionts to their giant clam host. Plant Cell Environ. 26, 1951–1961. (doi:10.1046/j.0016-8025.2003.01111.x) [Google Scholar]
- 24.Grant AJ, Rémond M, People J, Hinde R. 1997. Effects of host-tissue homogenate of the scleractinian coral Plesiastrea versipora on glycerol metabolism in isolated symbiotic dinoflagellates. Mar. Biol. 128, 665–670. (doi:10.1007/s002270050133) [Google Scholar]
- 25.Muscatine L. 1990. The role of symbiotic algae in carbon and energy flux in coral reefs. In Ecosystems of the world (ed. Dubinsky Z.), pp. 75–87. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Harrison PL, Wallace CC. 1990. Reproduction, dispersal and recruitment of scleractinian corals. In Ecosystems of the world (ed. Dubinsky Z.), pp. 133–208. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fitt WK, Fisher CR, Trench RK. 1986. Contribution of the symbiotic dinoflagellate Symbiodinium microadriaticum to the nutrition, growth and survival of larval and juvenile tridacnid clams. Aquaculture 55, 5–22. (doi:10.1016/0044-8486(86)90051-7) [Google Scholar]
- 28.Baird AH, Guest JR, Willis BL. 2009. Systematic and biogeographical patterns in the reproductive biology of scleractinian corals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Systematics 40, 551–571. (doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120220) [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mohamed AR, et al. 2016. The transcriptomic response of the coral Acropora digitifera to a competent Symbiodinium strain: the symbiosome as an arrested early phagosome. Mol. Ecol. 25, 3127–3141. (doi:10.1111/mec.13659) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wolfowicz I, Baumgarten S, Voss PA, Hambleton EA, Voolstra CR, Hatta M, Guse A. 2016. Aiptasia sp. larvae as a model to reveal mechanisms of symbiont selection in cnidarians. Sci. Rep. 6, 32366 (doi:10.1038/srep32366) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Baumgarten S, et al. 2015. The genome of Aiptasia, a sea anemone model for coral symbiosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 11 893–11 898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Aranda M, et al. 2016. Genomes of coral dinoflagellate symbionts highlight evolutionary adaptations conducive to a symbiotic lifestyle. Sci. Rep. 6, 39734 (doi:10.1038/srep39734) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Shoguchi E, et al. 2013. Draft assembly of the Symbiodinium minutum nuclear genome reveals dinoflagellate gene structure. Curr. Biol. 23, 1399–1408. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.05.062) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lin S, et al. 2015. The Symbiodinium kawagutii genome illuminates dinoflagellate gene expression and coral symbiosis. Science 350, 691–694. (doi:10.1126/science.aad0408) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kühlbrandt W. 2004. Biology, structure and mechanism of P-type ATPases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 282–295. (doi:10.1038/nrm1354) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Møller J V, Juul B, le Maire M. 1996. Structural organization, ion transport, and energy transduction of P-type ATPases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1286, 1–51. (doi:10.1016/0304-4157(95)00017-8) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bertucci A, Tambutté E, Tambutté S, Allemand D, Zoccola D. 2010. Symbiosis-dependent gene expression in coral-dinoflagellate association: cloning and characterization of a P-type H+-ATPase gene. Proc. R. Soc. B 277, 87–95. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1266) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mies M, Van Sluys MA, Metcalfe CJ, Sumida PYG. 2017. Molecular evidence of symbiotic activity between Symbiodinium and Tridacna maxima larvae. Symbiosis 72, 13–22. (doi:10.1007/s13199-016-0433-8) [Google Scholar]
- 39.Guillard RR, Ryther JH. 1962. Studies of marine planktonic diatoms, I: Cycotella nana Hustedt, and Detonula confervacea (Cleve) Gran. Can. J. Microbiol. 8, 229–239. (doi:10.1139/m62-029) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mies M, Sumida PYG. 2012. Giant clam aquaculture: a review on induced spawning and larval rearing. Int. J Mar. Sci. 2, 62–69. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Carroll DJ, Kempf SC. 1990. Laboratory culture of the aeolid nudibranch Berghia verrucicornis (Mollusca, Opisthobranchia): some aspects of its development and life history. Biol. Bull. 179, 243–253. (doi:10.2307/1542315) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pires DO, Castro CB, Segal B, Pereira CM, do Carmo EC, da Silva RG, Calderon EN. 2016. Reprodução de Corais de Águas rasas do Brasil. In Conhecendo os Recifes Brasileiros (eds Zilberberg C, Abrantes DP, Marques JA, Machado LF, Marangoni LFB), pp. 111–128. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Museu Nacional. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Castro CB, Pires D. 2001. Brazilian coral reefs: what we already know and what is still missing. Bull. Mar. Sci. 69, 357–371. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Neves EG, Pires DO. 2002. Sexual reproduction of Brazilian coral Mussismilia hispida (Verrill, 1902). Coral Reefs 21, 161–168. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Mies M, Braga F, Scozzafave MS, Lemos D, Sumida PYG. 2012. Early development, survival and growth rates of the giant clam Tridacna crocea (Bivalvia: Tridacnidae). Braz. J. Oceanogr. 60, 129–135. (doi:10.1590/S1679-87592012000200003) [Google Scholar]
- 46.Beckvar N. 1981. Cultivation, spawning, and growth of the giant clams Tridacna gigas, T. derasa, and T. squamosa in Palau, Caroline Islands. Aquaculture 24, 21–30. (doi:10.1016/0044-8486(81)90040-5) [Google Scholar]
- 47.Braley RD. 1985. Serotonin-induced spawning in giant clams (Bivalvia: Tridacnidae). Aquaculture 47, 321–325. (doi:10.1016/0044-8486(85)90217-0) [Google Scholar]
- 48.Alcazar SN, Solis EP, Alcala AC. 1987. Serotonin-induced spawning and larval rearing of the China clam, Hippopus porcellanus Rosewater (Bivalvia: Tridacnidae). Aquaculture 66, 359–368. (doi:10.1016/0044-8486(87)90119-0) [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mies M, Braga F, Scozzafave MS, Sumida PYG, Lemos D. 2013. Successful spawning and a possible solution for broodstock mortality in giant clams (Tridacnidae): a neurotransmitter injection through the byssal orifice. Aquaculture Res. 44, 671–676. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.03055.x) [Google Scholar]
- 50.Heslinga GA, Watson TC, Isamu T (eds). 1990. Giant clam farming. Honolulu, HI: Pacific Fisheries Development Foundation (NMFS/NOAA). [Google Scholar]
- 51.LaJeunesse TC, Trench RK. 2000. Biogeography of two species of Symbiodinium (Freudenthal) inhabiting the intertidal sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima (Brandt). Biol. Bull. 199, 126–134. (doi:10.2307/1542872) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Meade JC, Li C, Stiles JK, Moate ME, Penny JI, Krishna S, Finley RW. 2000. The Trypanosoma cruzi genome contains ion motive ATPase genes which closely resemble Leishmania proton pumps. Parasitol. Int. 49, 309–320. (doi:10.1016/S1383-5769(00)00061-1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hackett JD, Scheetz TE, Yoon HS, Soares MB, Bonaldo MF, Casavant TL, Bhattacharya D. 2005. Insights into a dinoflagellate genome through expressed sequence tag analysis. BMC Genomics 6, 80 (doi:10.1186/1471-2164-6-80) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Patron NJ, Waller RF, Archibald JM, Keeling PJ. 2005. Complex protein targeting to dinoflagellate plastids. J. Mol. Biol. 348, 1015–1024. (doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2005.03.030) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Karako-Lampert S, Hershkovits G, Stambler N, Simon-Blecher N, Achituv Y, Dubinsky Z, Katcoff DJ. 2006. Differential gene expression in Symbiodinium microadriaticum clade B following stress. Mar. Biotechnol. 8, 268–274. (doi:10.1007/s10126-005-5008-2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Leggat W, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Dove S, Yellowlees D. 2007. Analysis of an EST library from the dinoflagellate (Symbiodinium sp.) symbiont of reef-building corals. J. Phycol. 43, 1010–1021. (doi:10.1111/j.1529-8817.2007.00387.x) [Google Scholar]
- 57.Toulza E, Shin MS, Blanc G, Audic S, Laabir M, Collos Y, Claverie JM, Grzebyk D. 2010. Gene expression in proliferating cells of the dinoflagellate Alexandrium catenella (Dinophyceae). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 4521–4529. (doi:10.1128/AEM.02345-09) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Bayer T, Aranda M, Sunagawa S, Yum LK, DeSalvo MK, Lindquist E, Coffroth MA, Voolstra CR, Medina M. 2012. Symbiodinium transcriptomes: genome insights into the dinoflagellate symbionts of reef-building corals. PLoS ONE 7, e35269 (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035269) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ladner JT, Barshis DJ, Palumbi SR. 2012. Protein evolution in two co-occurring types of Symbiodinium: an exploration into the genetic basis of thermal tolerance in Symbiodinium clade D. BMC Evol. Biol. 12, 217 (doi:10.1186/1471-2148-12-217) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Rosic N, Ling EYS, Chan C-KK, Lee HC, Kaniewska P, Edwards D, Dove S, Hoegh-Guldberg O. 2014. Unfolding the secrets of coral-algal symbiosis. ISME J. 9, 1–13. (doi:10.1038/ismej.2014.182) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Baumgarten S, Bayer T, Aranda M, Liew Y, Carr A, Micklem G, Voolstra C. 2013. Integrating microRNA and mRNA expression profiling in Symbiodinium microadriaticum, a dinoflagellate symbiont of reef-building corals. BMC Genomics 14, 704 (doi:10.1186/1471-2164-14-704) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Rosic NN, Hoegh-Guldberg O. 2010. A method for extracting a high-quality RNA from Symbiodinium sp. J. Appl. Phycol. 22, 139–146. (doi:10.1007/s10811-009-9433-x) [Google Scholar]
- 63.Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (eds). 1989. Molecular cloning. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. [Google Scholar]
- 64.Sayers EW, et al. 2012. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 13–25. (doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1184) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 2731–2739. (doi:10.1093/molbev/msr121) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Davy SK, Allemand D, Weis VM. 2012. Cell biology of cnidarian-dinoflagellate symbiosis. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 76, 229–261. (doi:10.1128/MMBR.05014-11) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Polato NR, Voolstra CR, Schnetzer J, DeSalvo MK, Randall CJ, Szmant AM, Medina M, Baums IB. 2010. Location-specific responses to thermal stress in larvae of the reef-building coral Montastraea faveolata. PLoS ONE 5, e11221 (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011221) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Voolstra CR, Schwarz JA, Schnetzer J, Sunagawa S, Desalvo MK, Szmant AM, Coffroth MA, Medina M. 2009. The host transcriptome remains unaltered during the establishment of coral-algal symbioses. Mol. Ecol. 18, 1823–1833. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04167.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Voolstra CR, Schnetzer J, Peshkin L, Randall CJ, Szmant AM, Medina M. 2009. Effects of temperature on gene expression in embryos of the coral Montastraea faveolata. BMC Genomics 10, 1–9. (doi:10.1186/1471-2164-10-627) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Schnitzler CE, Weis VM. 2010. Coral larvae exhibit few measurable transcriptional changes during the onset of coral-dinoflagellate endosymbiosis. Mar. Genomics 3, 107–116. (doi:10.1016/j.margen.2010.08.002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.deBoer ML, Krupp DA, Weis VM. 2007. Proteomic and transcriptional analyses of coral larvae newly engaged in symbiosis with dinoflagellates. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. D Genomics Proteomics 2, 63–73. (doi:10.1016/j.cbd.2006.11.003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Goiran C, Al-Moghrabi S, Allemand D, Jaubert J. 1996. Inorganic carbon uptake for photosynthesis by the symbiotic coral/dinoflagellate association: I. Photosynthetic performances of symbionts and dependence on sea water bicarbonate. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 199, 207–225. (doi:10.1016/0022-0981(95)00201-4) [Google Scholar]
- 73.Pardo JM, Serrano R. 1989. Structure of a plasma membrane H+-ATPase from the plant Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Biol. Chem. 264, 8557–8562. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Popova LG, Balnokin YV. 1992. H+-translocating ATPase and Na+/H+ antiport activities in the plasma membrane of the marine alga Platymonas viridis. FEBS Lett. 309, 333–336. (doi:10.1016/0014-5793(92)80801-M) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Marlow HQ, Martindale MQ. 2007. Embryonic development in two species of scleractinian coral embryos: Symbiodinium localization and mode of gastrulation. Evol. Dev. 9, 355–367. (doi:10.1111/j.1525-142X.2007.00173.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Cumbo VR, Baird AH, van Oppen MJH. 2012. The promiscuous larvae: flexibility in the establishment of symbiosis in corals. Coral Reefs 32, 111–120. (doi:10.1007/s00338-012-0951-7) [Google Scholar]
- 77.Schwarz JA, Krupp DA, Weis VM. 1999. Late larval development and onset of symbiosis in the scleractinian coral Fungia scutaria. Biol. Bull. 196, 70–79. (doi:10.2307/1543169) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Ramos MG, Banaszak AT. 2014. Symbiotic association between Symbiodinium and the gastropod Strombus gigas: larval acquisition of symbionts. Mar. Biotechnol. 16, 193–201. (doi:10.1007/s10126-013-9536-x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Harii S, Yasuda N, Rodriguez-Lanetty M, Irie T, Hidaka M. 2009. Onset of symbiosis and distribution patterns of symbiotic dinoflagellates in the larvae of scleractinian corals. Mar. Biol. 156, 1203–1212. (doi:10.1007/s00227-009-1162-9) [Google Scholar]
- 80.Rodriguez-Lanetty M, Wood-Charlson EM, Hollingsworth LL, Krupp DA, Weis VM. 2006. Temporal and spatial infection dynamics indicate recognition events in the early hours of a dinoflagellate/coral symbiosis. Mar. Biol. 149, 713–719. (doi:10.1007/s00227-006-0272-x) [Google Scholar]
- 81.Kopp C, Domart-Coulon I, Barthelemy D, Meibom A. 2016. Nutritional input from dinoflagellate symbionts in reef-building corals is minimal during planula larval life stage. Sci. Adv. 2, e1500681 (doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500681) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Mies M, Chaves-Filho AB, Miyamoto S, Güth AZ, Tenório AA, Castro CB, Pires DO, Calderon EN, Sumida PYG. Submitted. Production of three symbiosis-related fatty acids by Symbiodinium clades A-F associated with coral reef larvae.
- 83.Mies M, Güth AZ, Castro CB, Pires DO, Calderon EN, Pompeu M, Sumida PYG. Submitted. Bleaching in coral reef larvae associated with Symbiodinium clades A-F.
- 84.Olivotto I, Planas M, Simões N, Holt GJ, Avella MA, Calado R. 2011. Advances in breeding and rearing marine ornamentals. J. World Aquaculture Soc. 42, 135–166. (doi:10.1111/j.1749-7345.2011.00453.x) [Google Scholar]
- 85.Hoegh-Guldberg O, Hinde R. 1986. Studies on a nudibranch that contains zooxanthellae I. Photosynthesis, respiration and the translocation of newly fixed carbon by zooxanthellae in Pteraeolidia ianthina. Proc. R. Soc. B 228, 493–509. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1986.0066) [Google Scholar]
- 86.Kempf SC. 1991. A ‘primitive’ symbiosis between the aeolid nudibranch Berghia verrucicornis (A. Costa, 1867) and a zooxanthella. J. Molluscan Stud. 57, 75–85. (doi:10.1093/mollus/57.Supplement_Part_4.75) [Google Scholar]
- 87.Burghardt I, Evertsen J, Johnsen G, Wägele H. 2005. Solar powered seaslugs—mutualistic symbiosis of aeolid Nudibranchia (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Opisthobranchia) with Symbiodinium. Symbiosis 38, 227–250. [Google Scholar]
- 88.Rudman WB. 1981. The anatomy and biology of alcyonarian-feeding aeolid opisthobranch molluscs and their development of symbiosis with zooxanthellae. Zool. J. Linnean Soc. 72, 219–262. (doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1981.tb01571.x) [Google Scholar]
- 89.Mies M, Dor P, Güth AZ, Sumida PYG. 2017. Production in giant clam aquaculture: trends and challenges. Rev. Fisheries Sci. Aquaculture (online). (doi:10.1080/23308249.2017.1285864) [Google Scholar]
- 90.Hirose E, Iwai K, Maruyama T. 2006. Establishment of the photosymbiosis in the early ontogeny of three giant clams. Mar. Biol. 148, 551–558. (doi:10.1007/s00227-005-0119-x) [Google Scholar]
- 91.Norton JH, Shepherd MA, Long HM, Fitt WK. 1992. The zooxanthellal tubular system in the giant clam. Biol. Bull. 183, 503–506. (doi:10.2307/1542028) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Pizay MD, Lemée R, Simon N, Cras AL, Laugier JP, Dolan JR. 2009. Night and day morphologies in a planktonic dinoflagellate. Protist 160, 565–575. (doi:10.1016/j.protis.2009.04.003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Rees TAV, Fitt WK, Baillie B, Yellowlees D. 1993. A method for temporal measurement of hemolymph composition in the giant clam symbiosis and its application to glucose and glycerol levels during a diel cycle. Limnol. Oceanogr. 38, 213–217. (doi:10.4319/lo.1993.38.1.0213) [Google Scholar]
- 94.Yacobovitch T, Benayahu Y, Weis VM. 2004. Motility of zooxanthellae isolated from the Red Sea soft coral Heteroxenia fuscescens (Cnidaria). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 298, 35–48. (doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2003.08.003) [Google Scholar]
- 95.Morse ANC, Iwao K, Baba M, Shimoike K, Hayashibara T, Omori M. 1996. An ancient chemosensory mechanism brings new life to coral reefs. Biol. Bull. 191, 149–154. (doi:10.2307/1542917) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Fitt WK, Fisher CR, Trench RK. 1984. Larval biology of tridacnid clams. Aquaculture 39, 181–195. (doi:10.1016/0044-8486(84)90265-5) [Google Scholar]
- 97.Leggat W, Yellowlees D, Medina M. 2011. Recent progress in Symbiodinium transcriptomics. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 408, 120–125. (doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2011.07.032) [Google Scholar]
- 98.Kita A, Jimbo M, Sakai R, Morimoto Y, Miki K. 2015. Crystal structure of a symbiosis-related lectin from octocoral. Glycobiology 25, 1016–1023. (doi:10.1093/glycob/cwv033) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Pomeroy RS, Parks JE, Balboa CM. 2006. Farming the reef: is aquaculture a solution for reducing fishing pressure on coral reefs? Mar. Policy 30, 111–130. (doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2004.09.001) [Google Scholar]
- 100.Guest JR, Heyward A, Omori M, Iwao K, Morse ANC, Boch C. 2010. Rearing coral larvae for reef rehabilitation. In Reef rehabilitation manual (ed. Edwards AJ.), pp. 73–98. St. Lucia, Australia: The Coral Reef Targeted Research & Capacity Building for Management Program. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All the sequences produced in this article were deposited in the GenBank database, under accession numbers KY483989--997.


