R. Soc. open sci. 4, 161054. (Published 12 April 2017). (doi:10.1098/rsos.161054)
In figure 2, the height in Široki Brijeg is listed as 185.3 cm. The correct value is 185.4 cm. The corrected figure is shown below.
In table 2, the region of the town of Čapljina is mistakenly listed as ‘Canton Western Herzegovina’. The correct location is ‘Canton Herzegovina-Neretva’. The corrected table is shown below.
Table 2.
region | town | n | av. height (cm) |
---|---|---|---|
Canton Herzegovina-Neretva | Čapljina | 21 | 185.9 |
Canton Western Herzegovina | Široki Brijeg | 38 | 185.4 |
Region Trebinje | Trebinje | 120 | 184.7 |
Canton 10/Livno | Tomislavgrad | 37 | 184.6 |
Region Trebinje | Nevesinje | 71 | 184.5 |
Canton 10/Livno | Livno | 101 | 184.4 |
Region Istočno Sarajevo | Istočno Sarajevo | 55 | 184.0 |
Canton Western Herzegovina | Posušje | 37 | 184.0 |
Canton Herzegovina-Neretva | Mostar | 174 | 182.3 |
Canton Central Bosnia | Bugojno | 49 | 182.3 |
Canton Herzegovina-Neretva | Konjić | 44 | 182.0 |
Region Romanija-Foča | Pale | 23 | 182.0 |
Canton Sarajevo | Sarajevo | 324 | 181.8 |
Region Bijeljina-Zvornik | Bijeljina | 122 | 181.7 |
Canton Zenica-Doboj | Zenica | 157 | 181.5 |
Canton Central Bosnia | Novi Travnik | 30 | 181.0 |
Region Bijeljina-Zvornik | Zvornik | 28 | 180.9 |
Region Banja Luka | Banja Luka | 147 | 180.7 |
Region Prijedor | Prijedor | 110 | 180.7 |
Canton Tuzla | Tuzla | 68 | 180.7 |
Canton Goražde | Goražde | 57 | 180.7 |
Region Mrkonjić Grad | Mrkonjić Grad | 69 | 180.6 |
Region Romanija-Foča | Rogatica | 50 | 180.4 |
Canton Tuzla | Živinice | 20 | 180.3 |
Region Doboj | Doboj | 108 | 180.1 |
Canton Una-Sana | Bihać | 173 | 179.9 |
Canton Tuzla | Gračanica | 40 | 179.8 |