Abstract
This work is devoted to the systematic study of the optical and magneto-optical properties of sputter deposited CuFeO thin films in the photon energy region between 2 and 5 eV using spectroscopic ellipsometry and magneto-optical Kerr spectroscopy. The spectral dependence of both the diagonal and off-diagonal elements of the permittivity tensor is determined. A complete picture about the electron transitions in CuFeO is suggested in the frame of intervalence charge transfer and intersublattice charge transfer transitions. The effect of deposition conditions and post-deposition treatment in CuFeO films upon the optical and magneto-optical properties is discussed.
Keywords: spectroscopic ellipsometry, magneto-optics, spinel ferrite, CuFe2O4, permittivity tensor
1. Introduction
Recent conceptions of integrated photonic devices, which allow a high-speed data transmission, require the integration of elements that have non-reciprocal effects, such as optical isolators [1] or circulators [2]. Current materials widely used to fabricate non-reciprocal bulk components are ferrimagnetic garnets, which are non-compatible with current silicon technology. This significantly complicates the on-chip integration. Very recently, a novel design of magneto-optical waveguide-based cobalt ferrite nanoparticles embedded in silica matrix has been proposed [3]. Such a kind of magneto-optical photonic device has great promise to be easily integrated on a silicon chip. However, a detailed knowledge of optical and magneto-optical properties of ferrite material is crucial to properly design the device structure with an improved figure of merit.
Spinel ferrites with the general formula, MFeO (M = Mn, Cu, Zn, Ni, Co, Mg, etc.), are chemically stable, widely studied materials, due to their potential applications in biomedicine, solar cells, magneto-optical displays, high density magneto-optical recording, electro-magnetic wave absorbers, color imaging, gas sensing, etc. [4,5,6,7]. Copper ferrite, CuFeO, formed by the substitution of Fe ions in isostructural FeO by Cu ions, is one of the candidates for possible applications in novel non-reciprocal devices. The cation distribution can be described as (CuFe)[CuFe]O, where parentheses and square brackets denote tetrahedral and octahedral sites, respectively. The ground state of an octahedrally coordinated Cu ion is , while the only excited state is [8]. The inversion of the level order leads to the important effect on the E level, which is highly susceptible to a Jahn-Teller configurational instability [9] that removes the degeneracy of the ground state. Therefore, the octahedral Cu ions tend to suffer from a tetragonal distortion, and the tetragonal phase copper ferrite (), which is completely inverse, is the only one stable at room temperature. A phase transition from the tetragonal to the cubic lattice occurs at temperatures of about 390 C [10]. A special post-deposition treatment, which consists of an annealing procedure at high temperatures and subsequent quenching in liquid nitrogen, therefore, allows a preparation of cubic phase CuFeO thin films [11].
There have been several attempts to describe the optical and magneto-optical properties of various spinel ferrites in terms of absorption bands. Owing to the complex electronic structure, a confusing variety of interpretations has been reported, because of different assignments of observed transitions. Recent studies adopted the picture of intervalence charge transfer (IVCT) and intersublattice charge transfer (ISCT) transitions proposed by Scott [12]. In both IVCT and ISCT transitions, an electron is transferred from one cation to a neighboring cation on the same or a different crystallographic site. Unlike the crystal field transitions, the IVCT transition involves two cations, which results in the relaxed parity selection rule [12]. Therefore, a higher oscillator strength is expected for IVCT transition contrary to the crystal field and orbital promotion transitions.
Previous magneto-optical studies of CuFeO have been done employing the Faraday effect in the photon energy range between 0.5 and 2.5 eV [13] and the Kerr effect in the photon energy range between 2 and 5 eV [14,15]. Kim et al. [16] assigned the spectroscopic structures observed in the polar Kerr spectra of CuFeO to particular electron transitions. Unlike the permittivity tensor, the Kerr spectra are not directly related to the electronic structure, and such assignment is only approximative. To the best of the authors knowledge, there is no systematic study on the spectral dependence of the complete permittivity tensor of CuFeO. However, information about the spectral dependence of the complete permittivity tensor provides important information about the electronic structure of the material and is necessary for the design of novel photonic devices based on CuFeO.
In this paper, we present a systematic attempt to investigate the electronic structure of copper ferrites using the experimental techniques of spectroscopic ellipsometry and magneto-optical spectroscopy. Coherently with the results presented on various types of ferrite compounds, we carefully describe all optical transitions revealed by experiment. Moreover, we discuss the influence of the structural change of CuFeO on magneto-optical properties.
2. Experimental Section
CuFeO thin films were RF sputtered on mm polished fused quartz substrates using a tetragonal copper ferrite target, which was prepared by the conventional ceramic technique. The base pressure in a vacuum chamber was mbar. The film deposition was carried out in Ar + O gas mixture at working pressure mbar, and the oxygen to argon ratio was maintained at 15%. The RF power was 50 and 200 W at 13.6 MHz. The substrates were neither heated nor cooled during the sputtering. After the deposition, the samples were annealed at 850 C for two hours and, then, slowly furnace-cooled (SC samples) or quenched (Q samples) in liquid nitrogen.
The crystallographic structure and magnetic properties of deposited films were studied by a Philips PW 1729 X-ray diffractometer (XRD) and a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) [10]. XRD studies revealed peaks typical for cubic spinel structure ( = 1), in the case of the quenched sample, and peaks typical for tetragonal structure (), in the case of slowly cooled samples. This is consistent with the knowledge that the copper ferrite can be transformed from the low temperature tetragonal to the high temperature cubic phase only at temperatures higher than 390 C [17]. VSM measurements showed the highest saturation magnetization, , in the quenched sample and the lowest in the as deposited film [10]. The quenched sample exhibits 35% higher than the bulk value ( = 1700 G [18]), indicating the Cu cation redistribution. The parameters of investigated samples are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Basic parameters of the set of CuFeO samples. denotes the annealing temperature and denotes the saturation magnetization.
| Sample | Thickness [nm] | RF power [W] | [G] | [] | Structure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1—Quenched | 112 | 50 | 2300 | 850 | Cubic |
| 2—As deposited | 90 | 50 | 750 | – | As deposited |
| 3—Slowly cooled | 280 | 50 | 1500 | 850 | Tetragonal |
| 4—Slowly cooled | 230 | 200 | 1600 | 850 | Tetragonal |
The magneto-optical spectroscopy was carried out using an azimuth modulation technique with synchronic detection in polar and longitudinal configuration. The experiment has been done in the photon energy range between 1.2 and 4.6 eV. The experimental optical set up included a 450 W high power Xe arc lamp, quartz prism monochromator, polarizer, DC compensating Faraday rotator, AC modulating Faraday rotator, phase plate (for Kerr ellipticity measurements), sample in magnetic field, analyzer and photomultiplier [19]. In the small angle approximation, the complex polar magneto-optical Kerr effect was measured at nearly normal light incidence, as a ratio of of Jones reflection matrix elements, where and are the Kerr rotation and ellipticity. The longitudinal magneto-optical Kerr effect was measured similarly at the angle of incidence, adjusted to 72 degrees for p-polarized incident light as a ratio of [20]. The applied magnetic field was 470 mT and 100 mT in the polar and longitudinal configuration, respectively. In both configurations, the magnetic field was sufficient for the film saturation (as was checked by the measurement of the magnetic field dependence of the magneto-optical Kerr effect). During the polar configuration measurements, the samples were placed on a water-cooled pole piece of electromagnet, and their temperature was stabilized at 285 K. In the longitudinal configuration measurements, the samples were kept at the stabilized room temperature of 295 K. The effect of stray magnetic field on the optics was accounted for using an Al reflector.
Theoretical models of the magneto-optical Kerr effect have been calculated employing transfer matrix formalism [21]. In polar magnetization and normal light incidence, a layer of CuFeO was characterized by the permittivity tensor:
| (1) |
where all elements have real and imaginary part: . The diagonal element, , is related to the normal refractive index, n, and the normal extinction coefficient, k. The off-diagonal element is related to the refractive index and the extinction coefficient of right and left polarized light.
A four-zone null ellipsometer was employed to obtain the spectral dependences of ellipsometric parameters in the spectral range from 1.5 to 5.4 eV. To increase the accuracy of measured data processing, the spectra were recorded for three angles of incident light at 65, 70 and 75. Because the fused quartz substrate was side polished, incoherent back-reflections from the backside of the substrate contributed to the measured signal and complicated the optical characterization. Therefore, a liquid solution procedure (LSP) [22], in which a small amount of wadding paper infused by a mixture of glycerin and water, optically matched to the quartz, was attached to the bottom of the substrate to avoid the back-reflections.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Spectroscopic Ellipsometry
The spectral dependence of was parametrized by the sum of four damped Lorentz oscillators, and the least square method was employed to adjust the film thickness, the transition energy, strength and broadening for each oscillator. The spectral dependence of obtained for the quenched CuFeO sample is displayed in Figure 1. It is similar in shape to dependences reported on FeO [23], CoFeO [24] and MgFeO [25], indicating a similar electronic structure.
Figure 1.
The diagonal element, , of the permittivity tensor of quenched CuFeO thin film (Sample 1).
Spectroscopic ellipsometry revealed four optically active transitions centered around 2.4, 3.1, 4.8 and 13.2 eV. The first three transitions were also observed by magneto-optical experiments. The differences in energies are small and are within the experimental data errors. Therefore, we postpone the discussion of these transitions to the next section and focus here only on the transition centered near 13.2 eV.
The separation energy of about 5–10 eV between the valence band of oxygen orbitals and the orbital of the transition metal ions has been reported in various transition metal oxides [26,27]. Strong absorption above 8 eV has been reported by Zhang et al., [25] in optical reflection measurements on Mg and Li ferrites. Alvarado et al. [28] reported the same spectral behavior in photoelectron-spin-polarization measurements, with photon energies up to 11 eV on FeO. This suggests that the electric-dipole allowed transition between the O valence band and the Fe conduction band is responsible for the spectral structure near 13.2 eV.
The obtained spectra of were subsequently used in the calculations of the off-diagonal element of the permittivity tensor, , from the magneto-optical Kerr measurements.
3.2. Magneto-Optical Spectroscopy
3.2.1. Polar Geometry
Experimental spectra of polar Kerr rotation, , and ellipticity, , of all investigated samples are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3. A low level of noise in the spectra reflects the very good quality of CuFeO films. All samples exhibit similar spectral behavior of the polar Kerr effect with only minor differences. A contribution of the propagation across the film resulting in the interference is clearly visible in the photon energy range below 2.4 eV. Besides, the polar Kerr rotation spectra are dominated by two visible peaks with opposite signs near 3.1 and 4.2 eV. On the other hand, polar Kerr ellipticity spectra show positive peaks near 3.5 and 3.8 eV. The amplitudes of the polar Kerr effect differ with the sample, which is due to the different (see Table 1). The highest amplitude is exhibited by the quenched sample, while the lowest amplitude is exhibited by the as-deposited sample. The increase in when the sample is quenched is the consequence of its transformation from the tetragonal to the cubic structure. In cubic copper ferrite, migration of cupric ions to the tetrahedral site causes an increase in the magnetization [11,29]. Reduced magnetic moment and the smallest MO amplitude of the as-deposited sample points to the presence of a nanocrystalline form of CuFeO [30,31]. Smaller grain size and large grain boundary volume leads to the suppression of exchange interactions responsible for the spin ordering in the lattice. Polar Kerr spectra show spectral behavior similar to that reported by Kim et al., [16] on samples prepared by the sol-gel method (note the different convention in the definition of magneto-optical parameters).
Figure 2.
Polar Kerr rotation spectra of CuFeO thin films measured at nearly normal incidence.
Figure 3.
Polar Kerr ellipticity spectra of CuFeO thin films measured at nearly normal incidence.
To get a deeper insight into the magneto-optical properties of CuFeO thin films, a spectral dependence of has been deduced from the polar Kerr measurements, considering a model structure of a thin CuFeO layer on a semi-infinite quartz substrate. The spectral dependence of for all investigated samples in the photon energy range from 2 to 4.8 eV is displayed in Figure 4. All samples exhibit similar spectral behavior of , with only minor differences. The most departing spectrum appears to be that of the as-deposited sample (Sample 2). This is, however, acceptable with respect to the similar differences in XRD and magnetic measurements. Nevertheless, all spectra of the real part of exhibit negative peaks near 2.6 and 3.1 eV and a broad positive peak near 4.2 eV. On the other hand, spectra of the imaginary part of are dominated by two positive peaks near 2.5 and 4.7 eV and a negative spectroscopic structure composed of two peaks near 3.3 and 3.9 eV. Such spectral dependences are similar to those reported on MgFeO bulk samples [32], as well as to those reported on LiFeO single crystals [25,33,34]. Martens et al. [24] reported experimental results on Co ferrite, but those results differ from the results presented in this paper.
Figure 4.
The off-diagonal elements, , of CuFeO thin films deduced from the polar Kerr measurements along with the fitted theoretical dependence.
The spectral dependences of derived from the magneto-optical measurements were parametrized by a summation of five paramagnetic line shapes [35], and the least square method was employed to adjust the energy, strength and broadening for each transition. The resulting fits are included in Figure 4, and the fitting parameters are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2.
The magneto-optically active transitions in CuFeO thin films between 2.0 and 5.0 eV. Listed are the transition energy, , linewidth, , intensity, (), and transition assignment. (Note that the parentheses denote the tetrahedral coordination and the square brackets the octahedral coordination.) ISCT, intersublattice charge transfer; IVCT, intervalence charge transfer.
| Sample | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| () | 0.0053 | 0.0072 | 0.0163 | 0.0075 |
| [eV] | 2.36 | 2.35 | 2.31 | 2.44 |
| Γ [eV] | 0.19 | 0.21 | 0.10 | 0.18 |
| Transition I | ISCT | |||
| () | −0.0017 | −0.0052 | −0.0012 | −0.0026 |
| [eV] | 2.73 | 2.66 | 2.55 | 2.64 |
| Γ [eV] | 0.14 | 0.44 | 0.07 | 0.11 |
| Transition II | ISCT | |||
| () | −0.0087 | −0.0019 | −0.0092 | −0.0079 |
| [eV] | 3.34 | 3.25 | 3.34 | 3.33 |
| Γ [eV] | 0.43 | 0.27 | 0.22 | 0.25 |
| Transition III | ISCT | |||
| () | −0.0063 | −0.0029 | −0.0081 | −0.0061 |
| [eV] | 3.89 | 3.72 | 3.84 | 3.86 |
| Γ [eV] | 0.27 | 0.49 | 0.35 | 0.33 |
| Transition IV | ISCT | |||
| () | 0.0099 | 0.0038 | 0.0087 | 0.0073 |
| [eV] | 4.74 | 4.71 | 4.66 | 4.50 |
| Γ [eV] | 0.72 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 0.53 |
| Transition V | IVCT | |||
A good agreement between the theoretical fit and the data deduced from the experiment is clearly visible from Figure 4. The fitting revealed five paramagnetic lines centered near 2.4, 2.7, 3.3, 3.9 and 4.6 eV.
A comparison of the spectra with the results reported on MgFeO [32], NiFeO [36] or LiFeO [25,33,34] helped to estimate which transitions are related to the iron ions and which are related to the copper ions.
The spectroscopic structure near 2.4 eV has been similarly observed in other ferrite compounds [25,32] and FeO [37], which indicates that such transition should involve only Fe electrons [23]. Therefore, it is assigned to the ISCT transition, , between tetrahedral and octahedral Fe ions.
The paramagnetic line shape centered near 2.7 eV is not clearly visible in the spectra, due to smaller oscillator strength. The most pronounced is this structure in sample 2. All spinel ferrites exhibit such a kind of spectroscopic structure in the vicinity of 2.6 eV. Clearly visible is the peak in the spectrum of LiFeO reported by Zhang et al. [25]. Since there is no change in energy with different ion substitution for this transition, only Fe ions should be involved. Fontijn et al. predicted an ISCT transition in FeO near 2.64 eV [23]. Therefore, this structure is assigned to the ISCT transition, , between octahedral and tetrahedral Fe ions.
The spectroscopic structures in the spectra centered near 3.3 and 3.9 eV were observed across all ferrite compounds [23,25,37], including CuFeO [16]. Consistently with previous reports, these structures were assigned to ISCT transitions between octahedral and tetrahedral sites, and , respectively. The 3.3 eV structure is attributed to an ISCT transition in the majority spin bands, while the 3.9 eV one, to an ISCT transition in the minority spin bands.
These two transitions are responsible for the magneto-optical properties of CuFeO in the spectral range between 2.8 and 3.5 eV. In this region, the slowly cooled (tetragonal) samples exhibit higher Kerr amplitudes than the quenched (cubic) sample. This is related to considerably higher amplitude () and broadening of transition IV in these samples. Since this transition involves tetrahedral ions, the migration of Cu ions to tetrahedral sites in the cubic sample causes the decrease of ions per unit volume, resulting in the smaller oscillator strength and, consequently, the Kerr effect amplitudes.
Unlike in the previous cases, the energy of the spectroscopic structure centered near 4.4∼4.7 eV noticeable varies with the sample. This is a consequence of the decreased accuracy of the fit procedure, due to the end of the measured spectral region. Moreover, in the UV region, the magneto-optical Kerr measurement suffers from a higher level of noise, due to the increased role of light scattering.
There is no comparable transition reported in LiFeO [25], NiFeO [36] and CoFeO [24], which points to the contribution of Cu ions. IVCT transitions between divalent substituted ion and trivalent iron ion, both situated at octahedral sites, were observed in Co and Ni ferrites, , at about 2.2 eV, and , at about 3.1 eV. Owing to the larger binding energies of more localized 3d electrons of Cu compared to Co and Ni, a similar transition is expected at higher energies. Considering the inversion of the electron level order for Cu ions, the last spectroscopic structure was assigned to an IVCT transition.
In the presented results, we did not observe crystal-field transitions of Cu ions, which are expected to be around 2.5 eV [38]. Such transitions are spin-allowed, but owing to the inversion symmetry at octahedral sites (which have a strong preference for Cu ions in CuFeO), they are parity forbidden, resulting in their small oscillator strength. Therefore, these transitions are not visible in the presented spectra.
As follows from Table 2, the slowly cooled sample sputtered at 50 W RF power exhibits a considerably higher amplitude () of transitions (except Transition II) than the sample sputtered at 200 W RF power. This might indicate a decomposition of the target material at higher sputtering powers, which results in the decrease of exchange interactions and a lower number of active absorbing centers per unit volume. This is expected to cause the decrease of the transition strength.
On the other hand, the transitions in the quenched sample are broader compared to those in slowly cooled samples. It seems that this has a connection with the migration of cupric ions to the tetrahedral site. Because the center of the symmetry is missing at the tetrahedral sites, electron orbitals are more opened, and covalent bonding is increased, which results in the broadening of the transition line shapes. However, more detailed structural and optical studies are necessary to confirm this hypothesis.
Finally, we make a comment on the crystal field (CF) splitting energy, , of tetrahedral and octahedral Fe ions in CuFeO thin films. As follows from Table 2, the crystal field energy splitting for the octahedral Fe iron, , is about 1.5 eV, while in the case of tetrahedral Fe iron, , it is about 0.7 eV. These values have been obtained as differences in transition energies. Camphausen et al. [26] reported that the octahedrally coordinated Fe ions give eV, while the tetrahedrally coordinated Fe ions give eV. Kim et al. [37] reported the value of eV. A reasonable agreement between presented values and previously published studies has been found. This confirmed the correctness of the assignment of the spectroscopic structures observed in spectra to the particular transitions.
3.3. Longitudinal Geometry
A longitudinal Kerr rotation spectrum of the quenched sample is shown in Figure 5. The spectrum exhibits three spectroscopic structures centered near 2.6, 3.3 and 3.9 eV. Theoretical calculation of the longitudinal Kerr rotation was performed utilizing the complete knowledge of the permittivity tensor of the CuFeO layer. The resulting spectrum is also shown in Figure 5. A very good agreement between the experimental values and the theoretical calculation is clearly visible. Small differences in the IR and UV region are due to the thickness inhomogeneity, as well as the surface roughness of the sample.
Figure 5.
Experimental and theoretical longitudinal Kerr rotation of quenched CuFeO thin film.
4. Conclusions
Optical and magneto-optical properties of sputtered CuFeO thin films with cubic and tetragonal structures have been investigated. The spectral dependence of the complete permittivity tensor has been derived in the photon energy range between 2 and 5 eV, and the influence of the post-deposition treatment on the magneto-optical properties of studied films was discussed. The combination of spectroscopic ellipsometry and magneto-optical spectroscopy revealed six spectroscopic structures in a broad spectral region near energies of 2.4, 2.7, 3.3, 3.9, 4.6 and 13.2 eV. The first five structures were described in the frame of ISCT and IVCT transitions between Fe and Cu ions. The last structure was discussed as an electron transfer between the O valence band and the Fe conduction band. Such assignment was confirmed by the derivation of the crystal field splitting energy for both octahedral and tetrahedral iron ions, respectively. The obtained energies reasonably agree with theoretically predicted values, as well as with experimental results obtained on similar compounds.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Czech Grant Agency grant No. P204/10/P346.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Zamani M., Ghanaatshoar M. Adjustable magneto-optical isolators with flat-top responses. Opt. Express. 2012;20:24524–24535. doi: 10.1364/OE.20.024524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Saib A., Darques M., Piraux L., vanhoenacker-Janvier D., Huynen I. Unbiased microwave circulator based on ferromagnetic nanowires arrays of tunable magnetization state. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2005;38 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/38/16/003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Choueikani F., Royer F., Jamon D., Siblini A., Rousseau J.J., Neveu S., Charara J. Magneto-optical waveguides made of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles embedded in silica/zirconia organic-inorganic matrix. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009;94:051113:1–051113:3. doi: 10.1063/1.3079094. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Liu T.Y., Hu S.H., Hu S.H., Tsai S.P., Chen S.Y. Preparation and characterization of thermal-sensitive ferrofluids for drug delivery application. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2007;310:2850–2852. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.11.129. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nixon L., Koval C.A., Noble R.D., Slaff G.S. Preparation and characterization of novel magnetite-coated ion-exchange particles. Chem. Mater. 1992;4:117–121. doi: 10.1021/cm00019a025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hankare P., Sanadi K., Pandav R., Patil N., Garadkar K., Mulla I. Structural, electrical and magnetic properties of cadmium substituted copper ferrite by solgel method. J. Alloys Compd. 2012;540:290–296. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.06.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chen N.S., Yang X.J., Liu E.S., Huang J.L. Reducing gas-sensing properties of ferrite compounds MFe2O4 (M = Cu, Zn, Cd and Mg) Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2000;66:178–180. doi: 10.1016/S0925-4005(00)00368-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ballhausen C.J. Introduction to Ligand Field Theory. McGraw-Hill; New York, NY, USA: 1962. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jahn H.A., Teller E. Stability of polyatomic molecules in degenerate electronic states. I. Orbital degeneracy. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 1937;161:220–235. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1937.0142. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Desai M., Prasad S., Venkataramani N., Samajdar I., Nigam A.K., Krishnan R. Enhanced magnetization in sputter-deposited copper ferrite thin films. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2002;246:266–269. doi: 10.1016/S0304-8853(02)00066-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Desai M., Prasad S., Venkataramani N., Samajdar I., Nigam A.K., Krishnan R. Annealing induced structural change in sputter deposited copper ferrite thin films and its impact on magnetic properties. J. Appl. Phys. 2002;91:2220–2227. doi: 10.1063/1.1433176. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Scott G.B., Lacklison D.E., Ralph H.I., Page J.L. Magnetic circular dichroism and Faraday rotation spectra of Y3Fe5O12. Phys. Rev. B. 1975;12:2562–2571. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.12.2562. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kucera M., Kolinsky V., Visnovsky S., Chvostova D., Venkataramani N., Prasad S., Kulkarni P., Krishnan R. Faraday effect in cubic and tetragonal copper ferrite CuFe2O4 films: Comparative studies. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2007;316:e688–e691. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.03.076. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Veis M., Kolinsky V., Visnovsky S., Kulkarni P.D., Desai M., Venkataramani N., Prasad S., Krishnan R. Moke spectroscopy of sputter deposited Cu-ferrite films. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2004;272–276:E885–E886. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2003.12.212. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Visnovsky S., Veis M., Liskova E., Kolinsky V., Kulkarni P.D., Venkataramani N., Prasad S., Krishnan R. MOKE spectroscopy of sputter-deposited Cu-ferrite films. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2005;290–291:195–197. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2004.11.180. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kim K.J., Lee J.H., Lee S.H. Magneto-optical investigation of spinel ferrite CuFe2O4: Observation of Jahn–Teller effect in Cu2+ ion. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2004;279:173–177. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2004.01.078. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tang X.X., Manthiram A., Goodenough J. Copper ferrite revisited. J. Solid State Chem. 1989;79:250–262. doi: 10.1016/0022-4596(89)90272-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yang A., Zuo X., Chen L., Chen Z., Vittoria C., Harris V.G. Magnetic and structural properties of pulsed laser deposited CuFe2O4 films. J. Appl. Phys. 2005;97:10G107:1–10G107:3. [Google Scholar]
- 19.The magneto-optical spectrometer operating at the Institute of Physics of Charles University at Prague since 1975 was built by one of us (S.V.).
- 20.Veis M., Visnovsky S., Lecoeur P., Haghiri-Gosnet A.M., Renard J.P., Beauvillain P., Prellier W., Mercey B., Mistrik J., Yamaguchi T. Magneto-optic spectroscopy of La2/3Sr1/3MnO3 films on SrTiO3 (100) and (110) substrates. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2009;42 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/42/19/195002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yeh P. Optics of anisotropic layered media: A new 4 × 4 matrix algebra. Surf. Sci. 1980;96:41–53. doi: 10.1016/0039-6028(80)90293-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Antos R., Pistora J., Ohlidal I., Postava K., Mistrik J., Yamaguchi T., Visnovsky S., Horie M. Specular spectroscopic ellipsometry for the critical dimension monitoring of gratings fabricated on a thick transparent plate. J. Appl. Phys. 2005;97:053107:1–053107:7. doi: 10.1063/1.1854728. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fontijn W.F.J., van der Zaag P.J., Devillers M.A.C., Brabers V.A.M., Metselaar R. Optical and magneto-optical polar Kerr spectra of Fe3O4 and Mg2+- or Al3+-substituted Fe3O4. Phys. Rev. B. 1997;56:5432–5442. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.5432. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Martens J.W.D., Peeters W.L., van Noort H.M., Erman M. Optical, magneto-optical and mössbauer spectroscopy on Co3+ substituted cobalt ferrite Co2+Fe2−xO4 (0 < x < 2) J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 1985;46:411–416. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang X.X., Schoenes J., Reim W., Wachter P. Evidence for 3dn to 3dn−14s transitions in magnetite and in lithium and magnesium ferrites. J. Phys. C Solid State Phys. 1983;16:6055–6072. doi: 10.1088/0022-3719/16/31/019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Camphausen D.L., Coey J.M.D., Chakraverty B.K. One-electron energy levels in Fe3O4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1972;29:657–660. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.29.657. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wettling W. Magneto-optics of ferrites. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1976;3:147–160. doi: 10.1016/0304-8853(76)90026-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Alvarado S.F., Erbudak M., Munz P. Final-state effects in the 3d photoelectron spectrum of Fe3O4 and comparison with FexO. Phys. Rev. B. 1976;14:2740–2745. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.14.2740. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sultan M., Singh R. Magnetization and crystal structure of RF-sputtered nanocrystalline CuFe2O4 thin films. Mater. Lett. 2009;63:1764–1766. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2009.05.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Baubet C., Tailhades P., Bonningue C., Rousset A., Simsa Z. Influence of tetragonal distortion on magnetic and magneto-optical properties of copper ferrite films. J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 2000;61:863–867. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3697(99)00385-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Srinivasan G., Rao B.U.M., Zhao J., Seehra M.S. Magnetically ordered amorphous copper ferrite. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1991;59:372–374. doi: 10.1063/1.105462. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Visnovsky S., Prosser V., Krishnan R., Parizek V., Nitsch K., Svobodova L. Magnetooptical polar kerr effect in ferrimagnetic garnets and spinels. IEEE Trans. Magn. 1981;17:3205–3210. doi: 10.1109/TMAG.1981.1061610. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Visnovsky S., Thuy N.P., Stepanek J., Prosser V., Krishnan R. Magnetooptical spectra of Y3Fe5O12 and Li0.5Fe2.5O4 between 2.0 and 5.8 eV. J. Appl. Phys. 1979;50:7466–7469. doi: 10.1063/1.326921. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Visnovsky S., Krishnan R., Thuy N., Stepanek J., Parizek V., Prosser V. UV magnetooptical Kerr effect and reflectivity spectra of Y3Fe5O12 and Li0.5Fe2.5O4. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1980;15–18:831–832. doi: 10.1016/0304-8853(80)90784-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kahn F.J., Pershan P.S., Remeika J.P. Ultraviolet magneto-optical properties of single-crystal orthoferrites, garnets, and other ferric oxide compounds. Phys. Rev. 1969;186:891–918. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.186.891. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fontijn W.F.J., van der Zaag P.J., Metselaar R. On the origin of the magneto-optical effects in Li, Mg, Ni, and Co ferrite. J. Appl. Phys. 1998;83:6765–6767. doi: 10.1063/1.367992. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kim K.J., Lee H.S., Lee M.H., Lee S.H. Comparative magneto-optical investigation of d–d charge–transfer transitions in Fe3O4, CoFe2O4, and NiFe2O4. J. Appl. Phys. 2002;91:9974–9977. doi: 10.1063/1.1480482. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Balhausen C.J. Ligand Field Theory. McGraw-Hill; New York, NY, USA: 1962. [Google Scholar]





