Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1990 Aug;87(16):6349–6352. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.16.6349

Evolution of spatial cognition: sex-specific patterns of spatial behavior predict hippocampal size.

L F Jacobs 1, S J Gaulin 1, D F Sherry 1, G E Hoffman 1
PMCID: PMC54531  PMID: 2201026

Abstract

In a study of two congeneric rodent species, sex differences in hippocampal size were predicted by sex-specific patterns of spatial cognition. Hippocampal size is known to correlate positively with maze performance in laboratory mouse strains and with selective pressure for spatial memory among passerine bird species. In polygamous vole species (Rodentia: Microtus), males range more widely than females in the field and perform better on laboratory measures of spatial ability; both of these differences are absent in monogamous vole species. Ten females and males were taken from natural populations of two vole species, the polygamous meadow vole, M. pennsylvanicus, and the monogamous pine vole, M. pinetorum. Only in the polygamous species do males have larger hippocampi relative to the entire brain than do females. Two-way analysis of variance shows that the ratio of hippocampal volume to brain volume is differently related to sex in these two species. To our knowledge, no previous studies of hippocampal size have linked both evolutionary and psychometric data to hippocampal dimensions. Our controlled comparison suggests that evolution can produce adaptive sex differences in behavior and its neural substrate.

Full text

PDF
6349

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beatty W. W. Gonadal hormones and sex differences in nonreproductive behaviors in rodents: organizational and activational influences. Horm Behav. 1979 Apr;12(2):112–163. doi: 10.1016/0018-506x(79)90017-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berger T. W., Orr W. B. Hippocampectomy selectively disrupts discrimination reversal conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response. Behav Brain Res. 1983 Apr;8(1):49–68. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(83)90171-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Crusio W. E., Schwegler H. Hippocampal mossy fiber distribution covaries with open-field habituation in the mouse. Behav Brain Res. 1987 Nov-Dec;26(2-3):153–158. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(87)90163-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Crusio W. E., Schwegler H., Lipp H. P. Radial-maze performance and structural variation of the hippocampus in mice: a correlation with mossy fibre distribution. Brain Res. 1987 Nov 3;425(1):182–185. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(87)90498-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dawson J. L. Effects of sex hormones on cognitive style in rats and men. Behav Genet. 1972 Mar;2(1):21–42. doi: 10.1007/BF01066732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Diamond M. C. Sex differences in the rat forebrain. Brain Res. 1987 May;434(2):235–240. doi: 10.1016/0165-0173(87)90014-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gaulin S. J., FitzGerald R. W., Wartell M. S. Sex differences in spatial ability and activity in two vole species (Microtus ochrogaster and M. pennsylvanicus). J Comp Psychol. 1990 Mar;104(1):88–93. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.104.1.88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gaulin S. J., Wartell M. S. Effects of experience and motivation on symmetrical-maze performance in the prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster). J Comp Psychol. 1990 Jun;104(2):183–189. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.104.2.183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Joseph R., Gallagher R. E. Gender and early environmental influences on activity, overresponsiveness, and exploration. Dev Psychobiol. 1980 Sep;13(5):527–544. doi: 10.1002/dev.420130512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Joseph R., Hess S., Birecree E. Effects of hormone manipulations and exploration on sex differences in maze learning. Behav Biol. 1978 Nov;24(3):364–377. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6773(79)90223-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Juraska J. M., Fitch J. M., Henderson C., Rivers N. Sex differences in the dendritic branching of dentate granule cells following differential experience. Brain Res. 1985 Apr 29;333(1):73–80. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(85)90125-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Juraska J. M., Henderson C., Müller J. Differential rearing experience, gender, and radial maze performance. Dev Psychobiol. 1984 May;17(3):209–215. doi: 10.1002/dev.420170302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Juraska J. M. Sex differences in developmental plasticity in the visual cortex and hippocampal dentate gyrus. Prog Brain Res. 1984;61:205–214. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)64436-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Krebs J. R., Sherry D. F., Healy S. D., Perry V. H., Vaccarino A. L. Hippocampal specialization of food-storing birds. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Feb;86(4):1388–1392. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.4.1388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lipp H. P., Schwegler H., Heimrich B., Cerbone A., Sadile A. G. Strain-specific correlations between hippocampal structural traits and habituation in a spatial novelty situation. Behav Brain Res. 1987 May;24(2):111–123. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(87)90249-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Loy R., Milner T. A. Sexual dimorphism in extent of axonal sprouting in rat hippocampus. Science. 1980 Jun 13;208(4449):1282–1284. doi: 10.1126/science.7375941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Maier D. M., Pohorecky L. A. The effect of ethanol and sex on radial arm maze performance in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1986 Oct;25(4):703–709. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(86)90374-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Morris R. G., Garrud P., Rawlins J. N., O'Keefe J. Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions. Nature. 1982 Jun 24;297(5868):681–683. doi: 10.1038/297681a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nottebohm F. A brain for all seasons: cyclical anatomical changes in song control nuclei of the canary brain. Science. 1981 Dec 18;214(4527):1368–1370. doi: 10.1126/science.7313697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. O'Keefe J., Nadel L., Keightley S., Kill D. Fornix lesions selectively abolish place learning in the rat. Exp Neurol. 1975 Jul;48(1):152–166. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(75)90230-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Olton D. S., Wible C. G., Shapiro M. L. Mnemonic theories of hippocampal function. Behav Neurosci. 1986 Dec;100(6):852–855. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.100.6.852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pagel M. D., Harvey P. H. Taxonomic differences in the scaling of brain on body weight among mammals. Science. 1989 Jun 30;244(4912):1589–1593. doi: 10.1126/science.2740904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sherry D. F., Vaccarino A. L., Buckenham K., Herz R. S. The hippocampal complex of food-storing birds. Brain Behav Evol. 1989;34(5):308–317. doi: 10.1159/000116516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Stephan H., Frahm H., Baron G. New and revised data on volumes of brain structures in insectivores and primates. Folia Primatol (Basel) 1981;35(1):1–29. doi: 10.1159/000155963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Stewart J., Skvarenina A., Pottier J. Effects of neonatal androgens on open-field behavior and maze learning in the prepubescent and adult rat. Physiol Behav. 1975 Mar;14(3):291–295. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(75)90036-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sutherland R. J., Whishaw I. Q., Kolb B. A behavioural analysis of spatial localization following electrolytic, kainate- or colchicine-induced damage to the hippocampal formation in the rat. Behav Brain Res. 1983 Feb;7(2):133–153. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(83)90188-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tees R. C., Midgley G., Nesbit J. C. The effect of early visual experience on spatial maze learning in rats. Dev Psychobiol. 1981 Sep;14(5):425–438. doi: 10.1002/dev.420140505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Teyler T. J., DiScenna P. The hippocampal memory indexing theory. Behav Neurosci. 1986 Apr;100(2):147–154. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.100.2.147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Walsh R. N., Budtz-Olsen O. E., Penny J. E., Cummins R. A. The effects of environmental complexity on the histology of the rat hippocampus. J Comp Neurol. 1969 Nov;137(3):361–366. doi: 10.1002/cne.901370309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. West M. J., Schwerdtfeger W. K. An allometric study of hippocampal components. A comparative study of the brains of the European hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus), the tree shrew (Tupaia glis), and the marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus). Brain Behav Evol. 1985;27(2-4):93–105. doi: 10.1159/000118723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Williams C. L., Barnett A. M., Meck W. H. Organizational effects of early gonadal secretions on sexual differentiation in spatial memory. Behav Neurosci. 1990 Feb;104(1):84–97. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.104.1.84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wimer C. C., Wimer R. E., Roderick T. H. Some behavioral differences associated with relative size of hippocampus in the mouse. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1971 Jul;76(1):57–65. doi: 10.1037/h0031036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. van Haaren F., Wouters M., van de Poll N. E. Absence of behavioral differences between male and female rats in different radial-maze procedures. Physiol Behav. 1987;39(3):409–412. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(87)90243-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES