Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2017 Jun 1;12(6):e0178675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178675

3D fractional moving blood volume (3D-FMBV) demonstrates decreased first trimester placental vascularity in pre-eclampsia but not the term, small for gestation age baby

Sally L Collins 1,2,*, Alec W Welsh 3,4, Lawrence Impey 2, J Alison Noble 5, Gordon N Stevenson 3
Editor: Stefan Gebhardt6
PMCID: PMC5453560  PMID: 28570600

Abstract

Objective

To undertake an observational study to see whether first trimester placental vascularity, measured with a standardized power Doppler index: 3D-FMBV, is different in pregnancies which either develop pre-eclampsia or lead to term, normotensive small for gestational age (SGA) babies.

Methods

Women were scanned between 11 and 13+6 weeks. The placental volume (sPlaV) was estimated using our previously validated semi-automated tool. Estimates of 3D-FMBV were generated from the raw power Doppler signal for the whole utero-placental interface, UPI (FMBV-UPI) and 5mm into the placenta (FMBV-IVS). Differences in the placental volume and FMBV for pregnancies developing pre-eclampsia and resulting in term, normotensive SGA babies were compared with term, normotensive, appropriate for gestational age (AGA), controls.

Results

Results were available for 143 women. The placental volume (sPlaV) was reduced in both pre-eclampsia (p = 0.007) and term, normotensive SGA (p = 0.001) when compared with term normotensive AGA controls. 3D-FMBV estimates were significantly lower for pregnancies developing pre-eclampsia (FMBV-UPI, p = 0.03, FMBV-IVS, p = 0.01) but not for the normotensive SGA pregnancies (FMBV-UPI, p = 0.16, FMBV-IVS, p = 0.27).

Conclusion

Pregnancies destined to develop pre-eclampsia are more likely to have small placentas with significantly reduced vascularity at 11–13 weeks. Those pregnancies which were normotensive throughout but resulted in an SGA baby delivered at term, had significantly smaller placentas but with similar vascularity to normotensive AGA pregnancies.

Introduction

Pre-eclampsia and small for gestation age (SGA) babies, defined as <10th centile on customised growth charts[1] [2, 3], contribute disproportionately to the number of stillbirths worldwide [4, 5]. These babies are also at increased risk of other adverse perinatal outcomes [69]. Although much work is underway to find a first trimester screening test for pre-eclampsia [10, 11] little appears to be available to screen for SGA. Developing a simple, robust early screening test to identify those babies at risk of being SGA would help to focus limited healthcare resources towards increased surveillance of these pregnancies and potentially decrease perinatal mortality and morbidity rates.

Differences in the haemodynamics of single spiral arteries at the utero-placental interface (UPI) have been demonstrated with ultrasound (US) in SGA pregnancies [12]. However, the length of time and training required to perform this measurement means it is not feasible to be used for screening. Instead, a more robust and rapid assessment of vascularity that simultaneously images and analyses the spiral arteries feeding the whole placental bed (i.e. capturing the whole UPI and inter-villous space (IVS) in 3D) would be a highly desirable tool with potential for clinical utility. With its ability to estimate the degree of vascularity in tissue, 3D power Doppler (PD) ultrasound appears to be the ideal image modality to provide this. Until now, the only available quantitative measures of ‘vascularity’ have been commercially generated indices provided by the machine manufacturers. The validity and exact meaning of these indices have been hotly debated [1315] dividing opinion as to their usefulness. What is clear though, is that to make meaningful, quantitative inter-patient comparison, the differences in tissue attenuation unique to each clinical situation needs to be controlled for [16]. The PD measurement, fractional moving blood volume (FMBV) is the only tool that is able to do this and has been validated in 2D in animal studies [17, 18]. This technique cannot be performed in 3D with any of the commercially available software [13]. Using the raw data exported directly from the machine, we have developed a software tool to enable FMBV to be calculated in three dimensions (3D-FMBV) [19]. This allows standardised measurement of the vascularity of the entire UPI in the first trimester placenta.

This study is the first clinical application of 3D-FMBV, employing it to investigate whether the vascularity at the UPI and in the IVS is altered at 11 to 13+6 weeks in pregnancies destined to develop pre-eclampsia and/or be SGA at term.

Materials and methods

The study was conducted with NHS REC ethical approval (REC ref: 08/H0604/163). Written consent was obtained before enrolment. Women with singleton pregnancies undergoing a first trimester scan at the John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford, UK over a 12 month period were invited to participate. One third of the participants invited to participate were deemed to be at increased risk of pre-eclampsia and SGA as they had a history of pre-eclampsia or SGA babies in a previous pregnancy. The remaining two thirds were taken from an unselected population. Those under the age of 16 years, those with a BMI >35, or significant maternal chronic illness including diabetes, or treatment with medications associated with fetal growth restriction, such as beta-blockers [20] were not invited to participate in the study. Gestational age was calculated from the CRL at the first visit [21]. Sociodemographic and obstetric data were collected including age, parity, family history, past medical and obstetric histories. The results of the combined screening test were available to the investigators. No data was available to estimate the effect size of the differences in vascularity therefore the sample size was calculated to demonstrate a difference in first trimester placental volume between SGA and AGA pregnancies.

The scans were undertaken by a single operator (SC) with the participant in a semi-recumbent position at a gestation of 11 to 13+6 weeks. 3D volumetric scans of the placenta were acquired using a GE Voluson E8™ (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) and RAB4-8-D 3D/4D curved array abdominal transducer (4–8.5 MHz). After confirmation of viability and identification of placental position, the optimal probe placement for 3D acquisition of the whole placenta was identified. This was usually a cross-sectional plane close to the centre of the placenta. A static PD volume was captured using pre-determined machine settings [22, 23] and an individualised sub-noise gain (SNG) [22]. The volume was then checked to ensure that the whole placenta had been included; if not, the angle was increased or the probe repositioned and the process repeated. If any PD flash artifact was seen the process was repeated. Once a complete 3D PD placental volume had been captured it was stored and analysed off-line. All analysis was performed blinded to the pregnancy outcome.

The 3D placental volume was estimated using our semi-automated image analysis tool [24] and corrected for gestation by comparison with the crown-rump length (CRL) to produce the dimensionless index, standardized placental volume (sPlaV; calculated as (PlaV)1/3 divided by CRL) [25]. The estimates of 3D-FMBV were calculated according to the previously reported technique [19] using the raw 3D-PD ultrasound data for the following volumes of interest; the whole utero-placental interface (1mm deep—UPI), and 5mm into the placenta from the UPI (volume containing the intervillous space—IVS), see Fig 1.

Fig 1. Visualisation of utero-placenta interface (UPI) and volume of interest (VOI-IVS: 3D ‘slice’ of tissue between the UPI and 5mm into the placenta containing the intervillous space (IVS)).

Fig 1

Fig 1a) 2D B-Mode image with UPI overlaid (red) and voxels up to 5mm into placenta labelled based on distance; Fig 1b) 3D UPI (blue) shown with 2D B-mode slice; Fig 1c) Section of the 3D VOI-IVS coloured by distance away from UPI.

Postpartum data were collected by reviewing the hospital notes. The customised birth weight centile was calculated using the Grow™ software package (version 7.5.1, West Midlands Perinatal Institute, Birmingham, UK). Small for gestational age (SGA) was defined as <10th centile on customised birth weight charts (SGA) with appropriate for gestation age (AGA) babies being those ≥10th centile. Pregnancy associated hypertensive disorders including pre-eclampsia, were defined according to the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP) guidelines [26]. Early onset pre-eclampsia was defined as diagnosis of pre-eclampsia before 34 weeks. The Mann-Whitney test was used to detect a difference in the standardised placental volume (sPlaV), FMBV at the UPI (FMBV-UPI) and the FMBV for the volume 5mm into the placenta from the UPI (FMBV-IVS) for; SGA compared to AGA babies in the whole population; SGA compared to AGA in the term, normotensive population and pre-eclamptic pregnancies compared to non pre-eclamptic pregnancies in the whole population. Linear regression analysis was used to test if there was any correlation between FMBV and gestational age.

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 22, IBM Corporation, NY, USA). Results were considered to be statistically significant when p < 0.05.

Results

One hundred and forty-five wome with a singleton pregnancy were recruited. One participant emigrated and one terminated the pregnancy at 13 weeks after a diagnosis of Trisomy 21, leaving data from 143 women to be analysed. All 143 babies were phenotypically and chromosomally normal. One hundred and thirty-nine women delivered after 37 weeks’ gestation; 126 were normotensive throughout pregnancy; eight developed late onset pre-eclampsia and five were diagnosed with pregnancy induced hypertension. Of the four who delivered before 37 weeks, two were appropriately grown for gestation, one was SGA and one had early onset pre-eclampsia and was SGA. In total there were 20 babies who were SGA on customised centiles. For a full breakdown of the outcomes see Fig 2.

Fig 2. Flow diagram demonstrating the outcomes of all the participants recruited.

Fig 2

There were no significant differences in the baseline demographics between the 20 SGA and the 123 AGA pregnancies. There were no significant differences in the baseline demographics between the nine pre-eclamptic pregnancies and the other 134 women. Table 1 provides a full summary of the baseline demographics for each of the groups. The raw data containing demographics, outcomes and values for 3D FMBV, placenta volume and sPlaV for the study cohort are provided as supplementary material, S1 Dataset.

Table 1. Baseline patient demographics.

SGA (n = 20) AGA (n = 123) P value PET (n = 9) No PET (n = 134) P value
Age (years) 31 (16–39) 30 (18–44) 0.45* 32 (24–39) 30 (16–44) 0.5*
BMI (at booking) 25 (17–35) 24 (18–33) 0.71* 27 (21–35) 24 (17–33) 0.05*
Smoker 1 21 0.93 1 21 1.0
Alcohol (mean units/week) 1.1 (0–4) 1.3 (0–18) 0.49* 0.7 (0–4) 1.3 (0–18) 0.37*
Multiparous 12 59 0.68 6 65 0.32
Ethnicity
European 18 115 1.0 8 125 0.49
Indian 0 2 N/A 0 2 N/A
Pakistani 0 1 N/A 0 1 N/A
Mixed 1 4 0.54 1 4 0.28
East Asian 1 1 0.3 0 2 N/A
IVF pregnancy 0 11 N/A 0 11 N/A

P-values calculated using:

* t-test or

Fisher’s exact test

SGA = small for gestational age; AGA appropriate for gestational age; PET = pre-eclampsia; No PET = no pre-eclampsia; HX = History of; FHx = family history; IUD = intrauterine death; IVF = in-vitro fertilisation

The standardised placental volume was significantly different for all three groups examined (SGA vs AGA, p<0.001; term, normotensive SGA vs term, normotensive AGA, p = 0.04; pre-eclampsia vs no pre-eclampsia, p = 0.007; see Table 2). The FMBV was significantly lower for both volumes of interest (VOI) examined (FMBV-UPI, p = 0.01, FMBV-IVS, p = 0.01) in the SGA babies compared to the appropriately grown ones. However, when the term normotensive SGA babies (n = 13) were compared with the term, normotensive AGA babies (n = 112) the FMBV was not significantly different (FMBV-UPI, p = 0.3, FMBV-IVS, p = 0.4). When the pre-eclamptic pregnancies (n = 9) were compared with the non pre-eclamptic pregnancies (n = 134), the FMBV was significantly different (FMBV-UPI, p = 0.03, FMBV IVS, p = 0.01). FMBV was not correlated with gestational age (FMBV-UPI, R2 = 0.005; FMBV IVS, R2 = 0.004).

Table 2. Comparison by pregnancy outcome.

All SGA (n = 20) All AGA (n = 123) P value Normotensive, term SGA (n = 13) Normotensive, term AGA (n = 113) P value PET (n = 9) No PET (n = 134) P value
Gestation at scan (days)* 93 (83–97) 91 (82–97) 0.4 94 (83–97) 92 (82–97) 0.2 89 (83–96) 92 (82–97) 0.5
CRL (mm)* 70 (53–83) 70 (51–84) 0.4 76 (57–83) 70 (51–84) 0.2 64 (53–81) 70 (51–84) 0.4
Placental Volume (mm3)* 49.1 (14.9–95.0) 60.6 (13.4–130.6) 0.02 53.1 (26.3–95.0) 61.7 (13.4–130.6) 0.2 38.7 (14.9–74.1) 60.0 (13.4–130.6) <0.01
sPlaV* 0.24 (0.08–0.38) 0.30 (0.08–0.60) <0.01 0.26 (0.15–0.38) 0.30 (0.08–0.60) 0.04 0.20 (0.08–0.30) 0.30 (0.08–0.60) <0.01
FMBV UPI* 0.15 (0.03–0.57) 0.24 (0.01–0.65) 0.01 0.17 (0.06–0.57) 0.24 (0.01–0.65) 0.3 0.12 (0.03–0.35) 0.23 (0.01–0.65) 0.03
FMBV IVS* 0.03 (<0.01–0.39) 0.10 (<0.01–0.44) 0.01 0.09 (0.02–0.39) 0.1 (<0.01–0.44) 0.4 0.02 (<0.01–0.29) 0.1 (<0.01–0.44) 0.01

* Median (range)

SGA = small for gestational age; AGA appropriate for gestational age; PET = pre-eclampsia; No PET = no pre-eclampsia; CRL = crown rump length; sPlaV = standardised placental volume ((PlaV)1/3/CRL); FMBV UPI = Fractional moving blood volume at the utero-placental interface (UPI); FMBV IVS = Fractional moving blood volume for the volume containing the intervillous space (IVS), 5mm into the placenta from the UPI.

Discussion

This is the first time that 3D-FMBV has been calculated from raw US data and applied to a clinical situation. Using this technique, we were able to examine the vascularity of the UPI and the IVS demonstrating that the vascularity in this area is significantly decreased in the first trimester placenta destined to result in a pre-eclamptic pregnancy. The vascularity is not significantly different in the pregnancies destined to produce a term, normotensive SGA baby. However, the first trimester placental volume was significantly smaller for pre-eclamptic pregnancies and for term, normotensive SGA babies. From this sample it would appear that pregnancies destined to develop pre-eclampsia have small placentas with abnormal vascularity at 11–13+6 weeks. Those pregnancies which will be normotensive but result in an SGA baby delivered at term, have small placentas but with normal vascularity.

Histopathological studies have demonstrated shallow trophoblast invasion of the spiral arteries with inadequate remodelling in pregnancies complicated by both growth restriction [2729] and pre-eclampsia [30]. What is not clear however, is if these two pregnancy outcomes actually represent different clinical manifestations of the same underlying pathology [27, 31]. The reduced remodelling and smaller spiral arteries seen histologically should lead to a decreased amount of blood flowing into the intervillous space and therefore should be reflected in the observed vascularity of the IVS. If inadequate spiral artery changes are present in both SGA and pre-eclamptic placentas our findings would suggest that it is only severe enough to significantly reduce the vascularity of the IVS in the first trimester for pregnancies destined to develop pre-eclampsia.

Due to its availability and excellent safety record PD ultrasound is the ideal choice for volumetric imaging the placenta, but the inability to standardise the PD signal using commercially available indices and the flawed method of using a fixed PD gain setting has hampered its development as a clinical tool. These problems are resolved using 3D FMBV and the SNG setting thereby making 3D PD US an affordable non-invasive method for evaluating tissue vascularity. FMBV is able to control for differences in signal attenuation by calibrating the observed power Doppler signal to an area of known maximum signal strength, e.g. a large blood vessel at a similar depth as the target VOI. The influence of certain machine settings and differences in signal attenuation resulting from individual patient characteristics is minimized via this use of this internal control [32]. As FMBV is expressed as standardised percentage vascularity of the volume sampled, it also corrects for any differences in the size of the target. This means that it is appropriate to compare the absolute FMBV even when the placentas are different in absolute size.

We acknowledge limitations of this study. Small for gestational age (SGA) and fetal growth restriction are different, however there is little consensus on diagnosis of growth restriction at term. Customised growth charts were used to adjust for constitutional determinants of birth weight, as they have been shown to represent babies at much greater risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes [2, 3335]. Our main aim was to identify the ‘at risk’ pregnancy therefore the use of adjusted SGA is more appropriate than an unadjusted centile or other methods with less evidence behind them. Another limitation is the relatively small sample size. Work is underway to gather a considerably larger cohort which will be used to further examine the findings.

The major strength of FMBV is that it is the only standardised PD measurement index which has been validated in 2D using radioactive microspheres in an animal model [17, 18]. Work is currently underway to replicate this study in 3D using our published technique [19]. The underlying image processing pipeline to calculate 3D FMBV currently requires a user to outline a number of slices of the placenta before the computer automatically measures the placental volume and extracts the UPI and VOIs of interest. Full automation of this process is well underway. This will allow placental volume and vascularity to be calculated in real-time, providing a promising imaging biomarker for adverse pregnancy outcome.

Our vision is that this simple to use tool will then be freely available to both the research and clinical community. This will facilitate large, multi-centre studies into the utility and effectiveness of these imaging markers alone and in combination with other known markers such as PAPP-A. This brings the possibility of developing a real-time first trimester imaging tool for pre-eclampsia and SGA significantly closer.

Supporting information

S1 Dataset. Excel spreadsheet of raw data for complete study cohort.

(CSV)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the staff of the Fetal Medicine Unit at the Women’s Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, especially Ms. Katie Blissett.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

Research reported in this publication was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Human Placenta Project of the National Institutes of Health under award number UO1 HD 087209, the Oxford Partnership Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre with funding from the Department of Health NIHR Biomedical Research Centres funding scheme and the Lesley Stevens Fund, UNSW, Sydney. SC and GS are supported by NIH and NIHR funding. GS is supported by the Lesley Stevens Fund. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Moodley J, Ngambu NF, Corr P. Imaging techniques to identify morbidly adherent placenta praevia: a prospective study. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;24(7):742–4. doi: 10.1080/01443610400009402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gardosi J, Figueras F, Clausson B, Francis A. The customised growth potential: an international research tool to study the epidemiology of fetal growth. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2011;25(1):2–10. Epub 2010/12/08. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2010.01166.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Figueras F, Gardosi J. Intrauterine growth restriction: new concepts in antenatal surveillance, diagnosis, and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(4):288–300. Epub 2011/01/11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Clausson B, Gardosi J, Francis A, Cnattingius S. Perinatal outcome in SGA births defined by customised versus population-based birthweight standards. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;108(8):830–4. Epub 2001/08/21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cousens S, Blencowe H, Stanton C, Chou D, Ahmed S, Steinhardt L, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2009 with trends since 1995: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2011;377(9774):1319–30. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62310-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.McCowan LM, Harding JE, Stewart AW. Umbilical artery Doppler studies in small for gestational age babies reflect disease severity. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;107(7):916–25. Epub 2000/07/20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Figueras F, Eixarch E, Gratacos E, Gardosi J. Predictiveness of antenatal umbilical artery Doppler for adverse pregnancy outcome in small-for-gestational-age babies according to customised birthweight centiles: population-based study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;115(5):590–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Doctor BA, O'Riordan MA, Kirchner HL, Shah D, Hack M. Perinatal correlates and neonatal outcomes of small for gestational age infants born at term gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(3):652–9. Epub 2001/09/25. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.116749 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Severi FM, Bocchi C, Visentin A, Falco P, Cobellis L, Florio P, et al. Uterine and fetal cerebral Doppler predict the outcome of third-trimester small-for-gestational age fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19(3):225–8. Epub 2002/03/19. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00652.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.O'Gorman N, Wright D, Rolnik DL, Nicolaides KH, Poon LC. Study protocol for the randomised controlled trial: combined multimarker screening and randomised patient treatment with ASpirin for evidence-based PREeclampsia prevention (ASPRE). BMJ Open. 2016;6(6):e011801 PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4932292. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mone F, Mulcahy C, McParland P, Stanton A, Culliton M, Downey P, et al. An open-label randomized-controlled trial of low dose aspirin with an early screening test for pre-eclampsia and growth restriction (TEST): Trial protocol. Contemp Clin Trials. 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Collins SL, Birks JS, Stevenson GN, Papageorghiou AT, Noble JA, Impey L. Measurement of spiral artery jets: general principles and differences observed in small-for-gestational-age pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;40(2):171–8. Epub 2011/11/22. doi: 10.1002/uog.10149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Welsh AW, Collins SL, Stevenson GN, Gill R. Inapplicability of FMBV to VOCAL indices and the amplitude origin of power Doppler. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013;41(4):473–4. Epub 2013/05/04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Alcazar JL. Three-dimensional power Doppler derived vascular indices: what are we measuring and how are we doing it? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32(4):485–7. doi: 10.1002/uog.6144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Martins WP. Three-dimensional power Doppler: validity and reliability. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;36(5):530–3. Epub 2010/10/29. doi: 10.1002/uog.8836 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Welsh AW. A caution regarding standardization of power Doppler to measure perfusion in placental tissue. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31(1):111–2; author reply 2–3. Epub 2007/12/07. doi: 10.1002/uog.5203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rubin J, Bude R, Fowlkes J, Spratt R, Carson P, Adler R. Normalizing fractional moving blood volume estimates with power Doppler US: defining a stable intravascular point with the cumulative power distribution function. Radiology. 1997;205:757 doi: 10.1148/radiology.205.3.9393532 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hernandez-Andrade E, Jansson T, Ley D, Bellander M, Persson M, Lingman G, et al. Validation of fractional moving blood volume measurement with power Doppler ultrasound in an experimental sheep model. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23(4):363–8. Epub 2004/04/06. doi: 10.1002/uog.1002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stevenson GN, Collins SL, Welsh AW, Impey LW, Noble JA. A technique for the estimation of fractional moving blood volume by using three-dimensional power Doppler US. Radiology. 2015;274(1):230–7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14132363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bayliss H, Churchill D, Beevers M, Beevers DG. Anti-hypertensive drugs in pregnancy and fetal growth: evidence for "pharmacological programming" in the first trimester? Hypertens Pregnancy. 2002;21(2):161–74. Epub 2002/08/15. doi: 10.1081/PRG-120013785 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Loughna P, Chitty L, Evans T, Chudleigh T. Fetal size and dating: charts recommended for clinical obstetric practice. Ultrasound. 2009;17(3):161–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Collins SL, Stevenson GN, Noble JA, Impey L, Welsh AW. Influence of power Doppler gain setting on Virtual Organ Computer-aided AnaLysis indices in vivo: can use of the individual sub-noise gain level optimize information? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;40(1):75–80. Epub 2011/10/20. doi: 10.1002/uog.10122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Collins S. Development of placental ultrasound markers to screen for the term, small for gestational age (SGA) baby Oxford: University of Oxford; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Stevenson GN, Collins SL, Ding J, Impey L, Noble JA. 3D Ultrasound Segmentation of the Placenta using the Random Walker Algorithm: Reliability and Agreement. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015:In press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Collins SL, Stevenson G, Noble JA, Impey L. Rapid Calculation of Standardized Placental Volume at 11 to 13 Weeks and the Prediction of Small for Gestational Age Babies. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39(2):253–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Brown MA, Lindheimer MD, de Swiet M, Van Assche A, Moutquin JM. The classification and diagnosis of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: statement from the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP). Hypertens Pregnancy. 2001;20(1):IX–XIV. Epub 2002/06/05. doi: 10.1081/PRG-100104165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Khong TY, De Wolf F, Robertson WB, Brosens I. Inadequate maternal vascular response to placentation in pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia and by small-for-gestational age infants. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986;93(10):1049–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Brosens I, Dixon HG, Robertson WB. Fetal growth retardation and the arteries of the placental bed. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1977;84(9):656–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.De Wolf F, Brosens I, Renaer M. Fetal growth retardation and the maternal arterial supply of the human placenta in the absence of sustained hypertension. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1980;87(8):678–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fisher SJ. Why is placentation abnormal in preeclampsia? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(4 Suppl):S115–22. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4592742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Burton GJ, Yung HW, Cindrova-Davies T, Charnock-Jones DS. Placental endoplasmic reticulum stress and oxidative stress in the pathophysiology of unexplained intrauterine growth restriction and early onset preeclampsia. Placenta. 2009;30 Suppl A:S43–8. Epub 2008/12/17. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2684656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rubin JM, Adler RS, Fowlkes JB, Spratt S, Pallister JE, Chen JF, et al. Fractional moving blood volume: estimation with power Doppler US. Radiology. 1995;197(1):183–90. Epub 1995/10/01. doi: 10.1148/radiology.197.1.7568820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Figueras F, Figueras J, Meler E, Eixarch E, Coll O, Gratacos E, et al. Customised birthweight standards accurately predict perinatal morbidity. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007;92(4):F277–80. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.108621 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gardosi J, Francis A. Adverse pregnancy outcome and association with small for gestational age birthweight by customized and population-based percentiles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(1):28 e1–8. Epub 2009/07/07. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Narchi H, Skinner A, Williams B. Small for gestational age neonates—are we missing some by only using standard population growth standards and does it matter? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;23(1):48–54. Epub 2009/07/01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Dataset. Excel spreadsheet of raw data for complete study cohort.

(CSV)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES