Abstract
Regulation of intracellular Ca2+ signaling is a major determinant of CD8+ T cell responsiveness, but the mechanisms underlying this regulation of Ca2+ levels, especially in naïve CD8+ T cells, are not fully defined. Here, we showed that microRNA-150 (miR-150) controls intracellular Ca2+ levels in naïve CD8+ T cells required for activation by suppressing TMEM20, a negative regulator of Ca2+ extrusion. miR-150 deficiency increased TMEM20 expression, which resulted in increased intracellular Ca2+ levels in naïve CD8+ T cells. The subsequent increase in Ca2+ levels induced expression of anergy-inducing genes, such as Cbl-b, Egr2, and p27, through activation of NFAT1, as well as reduced cell proliferation, cytokine production, and the antitumor activity of CD8+ T cells upon antigenic stimulation. The anergy-promoting molecular milieu and function induced by miR-150 deficiency were rescued by reinstatement of miR-150. Additionally, knockdown of TMEM20 in miR-150-deficient naïve CD8+ T cells reduced intracellular Ca2+ levels. Our findings revealed that miR-150 play essential roles in controlling intracellular Ca2+ level and activation in naïve CD8+ T cells, which suggest a mechanism to overcome anergy induction by the regulation of intracellular Ca2+ levels.
Introduction
Cluster of differentiation (CD) 8+ T cells act as key effector components in adaptive immunity by killing intracellular pathogen-infected and transformed cells. To acquire effector activity, naïve CD8+ T cells require triggering via 1) interaction of the T cell receptor (TCR) with antigenic peptide-loaded major histocompatibility complexes, and 2) engagement of co-stimulatory molecules such as CD28. In the absence of co-stimulation, TCR-stimulated naïve CD8+ T cells cannot produce interleukin (IL)-2 and proliferate upon subsequent antigenic stimulation. This unresponsiveness of CD8+ T cells has been termed anergy1.
Activation, as well as anergy induction, of CD8+ T cells is associated with Ca2+-mediated signaling. TCR stimulation increases intracellular Ca2+ concentrations, which induce the nuclear localization of nuclear factor of activated T-cells 1 (NFAT1)2. Simultaneously, CD28 co-stimulation activates mitogen-activated protein kinase, which activates activator protein 1 (AP-1). Cooperation of NFAT1 with AP-1 induces expression of genes associated with T cell activation, such as IL-2, whereas NFAT1 activation without AP-1 initiates transcription of anergy-inducing genes, such as early growth-response protein 2 (Egr2) and p27 3, 4. Additionally, naïve T cells can acquire an anergic phenotype if the intracellular Ca2+ concentration is sustained at a high level before the TCR stimulation that accompanies co-stimulation, and such hypo-responsiveness can be normalized by blocking Ca2+ accumulation. Thus, variations in intracellular Ca2+ concentrations may contribute critically to the fate of T cells and the regulation of intracellular Ca2+ levels in naïve CD8+ T cells should be tightly regulated to avoid T cell anergy5. However, the regulating mechanism of intracellular Ca2+ in naïve CD8+ T cells is not widely defined yet.
During CD8+ T cell activation, intracellular Ca2+ concentrations are primarily regulated by the calcium release-activated Ca2+ (CRAC) channel and plasma membrane Ca2+ ATPase (PMCA)6. TCR stimulation induces Ca2+ release from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) through the inositol trisphosphate receptor, and the increased cytosolic Ca2+ level, in association with calmodulin, activates PMCA to extrude Ca2+ from the cell. The reduced Ca2+ concentration in the ER lumen, referred to as store depletion, triggers stromal-interacting molecule 1 (STIM1) to open the CRAC channel via interactions with CRAC channel protein 1 (ORAI1) in the plasma membrane. The opened CRAC channel causes an influx of extracellular Ca2+ into the cell7. Additionally, STIM1 inhibits PMCA-mediated Ca2+ removal from the cell8. The Ca2+-regulating activity of STIM1 is mediated by the formation of a complex with transmembrane protein 20 (TMEM20)9, followed by the translocation of the complex to the adjacent side of the plasma membrane, eventually enabling STIM1 to bind PMCA. Based on this Ca2+-regulating mechanism, TMEM20 appears to play a crucial role in CD8+ T cell activation that must be precisely regulated; however, the specific mechanism by which this occurs and the role in naïve CD8+ T cells are largely unknown.
microRNAs (miR) are noncoding RNAs about 22 nucleotides in length that mediate post-transcriptional gene regulation through translational repression and degradation of messenger RNA after binding to the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) of the target RNA10. Based on this regulatory activity, miRNAs, including miR-150, are widely associated with the development and biological function of immune cells. During T cell development in the thymus, miR-150 represses neurogenic locus notch-homolog protein 3, a factor involved in T cell differentiation and survival, suggesting that miR-150 is one of the controlling factors for CD8+ T cell development11. Recently, miR-150 was also shown to be required for CD8+ T cell activation12, and miR-150-deficient CD8+ T cells showed reduced proliferation, differentiation into terminal effector cells, and acquisition of effector function required for killing infected cells. Changes in the transcriptome, such as a decrease in proliferation/killing-associated RNAs and an increase in inhibitory RNAs, were suggested as a molecular mechanism associated with hypo-functional cells; however, the specific mechanism, including the direct target of miR-150 and the molecular events that followed antigenic stimulation in the absence of miR-150 in naïve CD8+ T cells, has not been elucidated.
In this study, we revealed that miR-150 is a critical factor in the prevention of an ectopic increase in intracellular Ca2+ levels, which prevents anergy induction in naïve CD8+ T cells. Mechanistically, miR-150 suppresses increases in intracellular Ca2+ levels by directly suppressing TMEM20 expression. This miR-150-induced reduction in TMEM20 allows naïve CD8+ T cells to remove intracellular Ca2+ and eventually inhibits the expression of anergy-inducing genes, such as Casitas B lineage lymphoma b (Cbl-b), Egr2, and p27. These findings provide a specific molecular mechanism by which miR-150 regulates CD8+ T cell activation and affirms the central importance of intracellular Ca2+ regulation in naïve CD8+ T cells.
Results
miR-150 deficiency increases intracellular Ca2+ levels in naïve CD8+ T cells
Since the levels of miR-150 are relatively high in naïve CD8+ T cells and gradually decrease after TCR stimulation, miR-150 may be involved in regulating CD8+ T cell function13. Transferred miR-150-deficient (mir-150 −/−) CD8+ T cells showed reduced proliferation in vivo (Fig. 1a) after antigen stimulation with recombinant Listeria-expressing gag Ag (Lm-gag), and they retained the characteristics of limited differentiation, including low expression of killer cell lectin-like receptor G1 (KLRG1), and high expression of CD127 (Fig. 1b). mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells also showed reduced function, in terms of decreased expression of effector-associated cytokines [IL-2, interferon-γ (IFN-γ), and granzyme B] and activation-/proliferation-associated molecules (cMyc, cyclin B1, T-bet, EOMES, Blimp1, IL-1β, Klrg1, Cdk6, Cdc23, and Cep120), compared with expression levels observed in mir-150 +/+ CD8+ T cells (Fig. 1c and Fig. S1), which is consistent wit results in a previous report12. Notably, the expression of the anergy-inducing gene (Egr2) increased in mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells (Fig. S1c). Additionally, the antitumor activity of CD8+ T cells decreased as a result of miR-150 deficiency (Fig. 1d). Collectively, these data suggested that miR-150 is required for proliferation, differentiation, and cytolytic activity of CD8+ T cells.
To determine the molecular mechanism associated with reduced activation and functionality in mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells, we first measured intracellular Ca2+ levels, because a change in intracellular Ca2+ level is one of the initial events during CD8+ T cell activation. Naïve mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells cultured under physiological concentrations of Ca2+-containing media exhibited increased intracellular Ca2+ levels relative to those in naïve mir-150 +/+ CD8+ T cells (Fig. 2a), and the increased intracellular Ca2+ levels in naïve mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells were sustained (Fig. S2)14. To determine the degree to which intracellular Ca2+ levels increased in naïve mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells, we compared the levels in mir-150 +/+ and mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells before and after TCR stimulation. The basal levels of intracellular Ca2+ in naïve mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells were already similar to the increased levels achieved in mir-150 +/+ CD8+ T cells following TCR stimulation and were not further increased by TCR stimulation (Fig. 2b). These data suggested that miR-150 is required for regulation of intracellular Ca2+ levels in naïve CD8+ T cells.
miR-150 deficiency leads to expression of anergy-inducing genes through NFAT1 activation in naïve CD8+ T cells
Because increased intracellular Ca2+ levels in the absence of complete TCR signals are known to activate NFAT1, which can then activate anergy-inducing genes, we hypothesized that the reduced functionality of mir-150 −/− naïve CD8+ T cells might be associated with ectopic activation of NFAT1 in naïve mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells2, 5, 15. Following incubation in physiological Ca2+ concentrations, naïve mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells showed increased nuclear localization of NFAT1 and active forms of NFAT1 (dephosphorylated NFAT1) (Fig. 3a,b). Additionally, naïve mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells expressed anergy-inducing genes such as Cbl-b, Src-homology region 2 domain-containing phosphatase-1 (SHP-1), Egr2, and p27, at higher levels than those observed in naïve mir-150 +/+ CD8+ T cells (Fig. 3b)4, 16–18. mRNA levels of anergy-inducing genes, such as SHP-1, Egr2, and p27 were also upregulated (Fig. 3c), and treatment with NFAT1 inhibitor (cyclosporine A) reduced the mRNA levels of anergy-related genes (Fig. 3d), indicating that upregulated expression of anergy-inducing genes is associated with NFAT1 activation in naïve mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells. Collectively, these results suggested that the reduction in naïve mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cell function might be associated with the induction of a Ca2+-dependent anergy-inducing molecular milieu.
Elevation of intracellular Ca2+ levels in naïve mir-150−/− CD8+ T cells is associated with downregulated PMCA activity
Intracellular Ca2+ concentrations are regulated primarily by CRAC and PMCA6. Thus, we first investigated whether the elevated intracellular Ca2+ levels in response to miR-150 deficiency were associated with impaired CRAC activity using an inhibitor for CRAC, 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate (2-apb). Treatment with 2-apb suppressed the increasing speed in intracellular Ca2+ levels both in naïve mir-150 +/+ and mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells (Fig. 4a). However, the intracellular Ca2+ levels in naïve mir-150 +/+ CD8+ T cells after 2-apb treatment were similar to those in untreated control CD8+ T cells, indicating that CRAC regulates Ca2+ uptake in naïve CD8+ T cells as it does in TCR-stimulated CD8+ T cells, but is not primarily associated with overall intracellular Ca2+ levels in naïve CD8+ T cells. Therefore, the intracellular Ca2+ levels elevated by mir-150 deficiency are not associated with CRAC activity. We then investigated the relationship between the intracellular Ca2+ levels elevated by miR-150 deficiency and PMCA function by using two different inhibitors of PMCA activity, La3+ and 5(6)-carboxyeosin19, 20. La3+ treatment elevated intracellular Ca2+ levels in a dose-dependent manner in naïve mir-150 +/+ CD8+ T cells, indicating that PMCA activity is crucial to regulating intracellular Ca2+ levels in naïve CD8+ T cells as it is in TCR-stimulated CD8+ T cells (Fig. 4b). The increased Ca2+ levels in naïve mir-150 +/+ CD8+ T cells after La3+ (1 mM) or 5(6)-carboxyeosin treatment were similar to those in untreated naïve mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells (Fig. 4b and Fig. S3). In the case of naïve mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells, the intracellular Ca2+ levels did not change after treatment with La3+ or 5(6)-carboxyeosin. In addition, the calculated Ca2+-reducing rates (Fig. 4b) in the untreated set (0 mM La3+) were lower in naïve mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells than those in naïve mir-150 +/+ CD8+ T cells (Fig. S4), suggesting that PMCA activity might have been impaired in naïve mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells before treatment with the PMCA inhibitors.
Mitochondrial calcium uniporter (MCU), sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA) in the ER, and sodium-calcium exchanger (NCX) in the cellular membrane are also known as regulators of intracellular Ca2+ levels21, 22. Thus, we also investigated whether these regulators are associated with increased intracellular Ca2+ levels in naïve mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells. Treatment with inhibitors of MCU (3 mM sodium cyanide + 2ug/ml oligomycin) or SERCA (1uM thapsigargin; TG) did not change intracellular Ca2+ levels in naïve mir-150 +/+ CD8+ T cells (Fig. S5). In NCX-inhibited conditions using sodium-free media, intracellular Ca2+ levels in naïve mir-150 +/+ CD8+ T cells were similarly unchanged. In naïve mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells, the intracellular Ca2+ levels did not change in MCU-, SERCA-, or NCX-inhibited conditions. Thus, MCU, SERCA, and NCX are not associated with overall intracellular Ca2+ levels in naïve CD8+ T cells, suggesting that increased intracellular Ca2+ levels in mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells are not associated with MCU, SERCA, and NCX. Collectively, these results suggested that increased intracellular Ca2+ levels in naïve mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells may be associated with impaired PMCA activity.
miR-150 facilitates PMCA function by downregulating TMEM20 expression
Because PMCA activity is negatively regulated by the STIM1-TMEM20 complex9, we investigated whether the impaired PMCA activity in mir-150 −/− naïve CD8+ T cells was associated with altered expression of STIM1 and/or TMEM20. TMEM20 protein expression was upregulated in mir-150 −/− naïve CD8+ T cells, but STIM1 and other Ca2+-regulation-associated molecules were unchanged (Fig. 5a). Confocal microscopic analysis also showed that TMEM20 expression was higher and co-localization of TMEM20 with PMCA was greater in naïve mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells than those in naïve mir-150 +/+ CD8+ T cells (Fig. 5b and Fig S6). Interestingly, TMEM20 did not seem to co-localize with STIM1 in both naïve mir-150 +/+ and mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells, indicating that the increased intracellular Ca2+ levels in mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells were not associated with STIM1. Thus, TMEM20 may suppress PMCA activity in a STIM1-independent manner in naïve mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells.
To assess the potential for miR-150 to suppress TMEM20 expression specifically, we performed an arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase (AANAT)-reporter assay as previously described23, 24. Based on the miRanda algorithm (www.microrna.com), the 3′UTR of TMEM20 mRNA contains a putative binding sequence for miR-150 (Fig. 5c), and overexpression of miR-150 reduced the expression of the AANAT reporter protein but not AANAT mRNA. In contrast, forced expression of a miR-150 mutant incapable of binding to the TMEM20 3′UTR did not change AANAT expression, suggesting that miR-150 suppresses the expression of TMEM20, and has the potential to do so directly.
miR-150 restoration recovers the miR-150 phenotype in miR-150-deficient CD8+ T cells
We then investigated whether miR-150 restoration could recover intracellular Ca2+ levels and the molecular signature in naïve mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells. We infected naïve mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells with a retrovirus-expressing miR-150 (retro-miR-150) and analyzed the resulting cell phenotype. miR-150 restoration increased miR-150 levels in CD8+ T cells (Fig. 6a). Furthermore, retro-miR-150 infection reduced intracellular Ca2+ levels in mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells to levels observed in mir-150 +/+ CD8+ T cells (Fig. 6b). However, intracellular Ca2+ levels in mir-150 +/+ CD8+ T cells were unchanged by the additional expression of miR-150, whereas TMEM20 expression in mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells was reduced by restoration of miR-150 (Fig. 6c). Additionally, retro-miR-150 infection of mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells reduced expression of anergy-related genes Cbl-b, Egr2, and p27 and increased the expression of activation-induced molecules granzyme B, cyclin B1, and Blimp1 following anti-CD3/CD28 stimulation (Fig. 6c,d). In addition, suppression of TMEM20 expression by infection with small interfering RNA targeting TMEM20 (siTMEM20) decreased intracellular Ca2+ levels in naïve mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells, indicating that the balance between TMEM20 and miR-150 regulates intracellular Ca2+ levels in naïve CD8+ T cells (Fig. 6e). These data suggested that miR-150 is required for activation of naïve CD8+ T cells by regulating intracellular Ca2+ levels and preventing the expression of anergy-related genes (Fig. 6f).
Discussion
In CD8+ T cells, increasing the concentration of intracellular Ca2+ after TCR stimulation is essential to inducing the expression of activation-associated genes2, 25, 26. Because controlling the Ca2+ concentration is crucial for T cell activation, there has been an extensive search for molecules, such as channels, transporters, and other proteins, associated with Ca2+ movement during T cell activation. The preconditions for increasing intracellular Ca2+ levels during T cell activation are a relatively low level of intracellular Ca2+ in naïve CD8+ T cells and an ectopic increase in intracellular Ca2+ levels before T cell activation turns T cells into tolerant cells5. Although controlling intracellular Ca2+ levels in naïve CD8+ T cells is also critical for T cell activation, regulatory molecules and associated mechanisms that determine the Ca2+ level in naïve CD8+ T cells are largely unknown. In this study, we showed that miR-150 controls intracellular Ca2+ levels by downregulating TMEM20 expression in naïve CD8+ T cells. The miR-150-induced suppression of TMEM20 expression prevented the expression of anergy-inducing genes and hypo-responsiveness of CD8+ T cells upon antigenic stimulation. Therefore, miR-150 is an essential regulator that creates an activation-favorable molecular milieu in naïve CD8+ T cells.
In this study, we showed that intracellular Ca2+ levels are increased by miR-150 deficiency in naïve CD8+ T cells. In mir-150 −/− naïve CD8+ T cells, the expression level of TMEM20 was increased, while expression levels of other Ca2+ regulating molecules did not changed. In addition, suppression of TMEM20 decreased intracellular Ca2+ levels in mir-150 −/− naïve CD8+ T cells, indicating that the increased intracellular Ca2+ levels in mir-150 −/− naïve CD8+ T cells are derived from the increased expression of TMEM20. Previous report showed that TMEM20 attenuates PMCA activity9. mir-150 −/− naïve CD8+ T cells showed high translocation of TMEM20 into PMCA in plasma membrane. In addition, Ca2+ reducing rate also decreased in mir-150 −/− naïve CD8+ T cells. Treatment of PMCA inhibitor did not changed the intracellular Ca2+ level in mir-150 −/− naïve CD8+ T cells whereas treatment of inhibitors for other Ca2+-regulating molecules changed the intracellular Ca2+ levels in mir-150 −/− naïve CD8+ T cells, which also can be an indirect clue that PMCA activity is inactivated in mir-150 −/− naïve CD8+ T cells. Collectively, the high Ca2+ levels in mir-150 −/− naïve CD8+ T cells are derived from increased expression of TMEM20, thereby inactivation of Ca2+ extruding PMCA activity.
Several regulators such as PMCA, CRAC, SERCA, NCX, and MCU control intracellular Ca2+ levels in TCR-stimulated CD8+ T cells22, 27. In this study, we showed that PMCA, but not other regulators, mainly controls intracellular Ca2+ levels in naïve CD8+ T cells. Although CRAC inhibition slowed the Ca2+ uptake rate in naïve CD8+ T cells, overall intracellular Ca2+ levels were not changed, indicating that the role of CRAC is limited to regulating intracellular Ca2+ level in naïve CD8+ T cells. The unchanged intracellular Ca2+ levels in naïve CD8+ T cells in SERCA- and NCX-inactivated conditions could be a result of Ca2+-regulating activity that is TCR-activation dependent. For MCU, their Ca2+-regulating function is associated with relocation of mitochondria. In TCR-stimulated T cells, mitochondria relocate to the immunological synapse, where the mitochondria act as Ca2+-controlling machinery through MCU21. Un-polarized mitochondria at the sites of Ca2+ influx in naïve CD8+ T cells might be a reason that MCU is not associated with intracellular Ca2+ levels in naïve CD8+ T cells.
In a previous study, TMEM20-mediated suppression of PMCA activity was shown to be dependent on calcium store depletion in the ER and co-localization with STIM1 in a Jurkat cell line model9. However, our co-localization data showed that TMEM20 does not co-localize with STIM1 either in naïve mir-150 +/+ or mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells. In addition, the expression levels of STIM1 were similar between naïve mir-150 +/+ and mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells. Considering the increased intracellular Ca2+ levels in naive mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells, STIM1 does not act as a regulator of intracellular Ca2+ in naïve CD8+ T cells. Thus, PMCA may act in a STIM-independent manner in naïve CD8+ T cells. Given that mir-150 has many targets, expression of undefined factor(s) supporting TMEM20 function could be increased in naïve mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells, and, thereby, the increase in TMEM20 with the associated factor(s) might suppress PMCA activity in naïve mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells before calcium store-depletion in the ER. Another possible mechanism for calcium store depletion independent of TMEM20-mediated PMCA deactivation is TMEM20 expression in the plasma membrane, which might deactivate PMCA function itself, but its function could also be limited by insufficient expression to act in naïve mir-150 +/+ CD8+ T cells. In this case, increased TMEM20 expression in naïve mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells may be sufficient to deactivate PMCA function, resulting in the increase in intracellular Ca2+ levels in naïve mir-150 +/+ CD8+ T cells.
The expression levels of TMEM20 mRNA were similar between naïve mir-150 +/+ and mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells. However, retroviral-mediated overexpression of miR-150 downregulated the expression of TMEM20 mRNA. Considering that miR-150 levels in retro-miR-150-infected mir-150 +/+ CD8+ T cells were more than 2-fold higher than those in the uninfected control mir-150 +/+ CD8+ T cells, retro-miR-150 infected mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells may have higher levels of miR-150 than those in mir-150 +/+ CD8+ T cells. Thus, it is possible that a normal amount of miR-150, such as that in naïve mir-150 +/+ CD8+ T cells, might repress translation of TMEM20, whereas overexpression of miR-150, such as that in retro-miR-150 infected naïve mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells, might suppress transcription of TMEM20. Given that miR-150 has many targets, miR-150 overexpression might induce suppression of TMEM20 as well as have additional or alternative effects, and the additional effects, not suppression of TMEM20 levels, could be the reason for the decreased intracellular Ca2+ levels in retro-miR-150-infected naïve mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells. However, we showed that suppression of TMEM20 expression decreased the intracellular Ca2+ levels in naïve mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells. Thus, TMEM20 expression levels, especially in the absence of miR-150, are critical to controlling intracellular Ca2+ levels in naïve CD8+ T cells.
Whether simply overexpressing TMEM20 is sufficient to increase intracellular Ca2+ levels in naïve mir-150 +/+ CD8+ T cells in questionable. In a previous report, TMEM20 overexpression did not change the intracellular Ca2+ levels in HEK 293 cells expressing STIM1 and Orai1 in thapsigargin-treated conditions, but thapsigargin-untreated conditions were not tested9. Although we showed that miR-150 deficiency did not change the expression levels of Ca2+-regulating molecules, except for TMEM20, miR-150 deficiency may influence undefined factor(s) required for TMEM20 function, as described above. In this case, simply overexpressing TMEM20 might not increase intracellular Ca2+ level in naïve mir-150 +/+ CD8+ T cell. To date, the mechanism of TMEM20 function and its associated/regulating molecules have not been widely investigated. Thus, studies on the mechanism of TMEM20 function and regulation should be conducted to better understand the detailed mechanism of Ca2+ regulation in naïve CD8+ T cells before and after activation.
miR-150 deficiency reduces CD8+ T cell activation, in terms of expansion, differentiation, and cytolytic function12. Although changes in the levels of several mRNAs in response to miR-150 deficiency were suggested in a previous study to be a mechanism for the observed reduction in CD8+ T cell activation, a direct relationship between altered mRNA levels and CD8+ T cell activation-associated molecular changes was not found. In this study, we showed that TMEM20 is a direct target for miR-150 in naïve CD8+ T cells and that the miR-150 deficiency-induced reduction in CD8+ T cell activation results from altered intracellular Ca2+ levels. In the absence of miR-150, elevated expression of TMEM20, a Ca2+ extruder, attenuates PMCA activity, resulting in increased intracellular Ca2+ levels in naïve CD8+ T cells8, 9. This increased intracellular Ca2+ induced activation of NFAT1, which consequently induced expression of anergy-inducing genes such as Egr2, Cbl-b, and p27 16, 17, 28. Because anergy-inducing genes such as p27 and Egr2 are reportedly miR-150 targets, increased expression of p27 and Egr2 in mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells may be a result of the loss of translational suppression of these mRNAs by miR-150 in mir-150 −/− naïve CD8+ T cells29, 30. However, following treatment with an NFAT1 inhibitor, mir-150 −/− naïve CD8+ T cells showed decreased levels of p27 and Egr2 mRNA, indicating that increased expression of anergy-inducing genes is primarily due to transcriptional regulation via the intracellular Ca2+/NFAT1 signaling pathway. Expression of these anergy-inducing genes related to miR-150 deficiency could explain the reduced proliferation, differentiation, and killing activity of naïve mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells upon antigenic stimulation, as previously reported12 and shown in our study. To avoid these miR-150-deficiency-induced molecular events, intracellular Ca2+ levels need to be sufficiently low to prevent NFAT1 activation.
It was previously reported that in effector CD8+ T cells, miR-150 levels are lower than in naïve CD8+ T cells13. Given that miR-150 suppresses expression of CD25, an IL-2 receptor, reduced miR-150 levels in effector CD8+ T cells can favor survival and proliferation31. Relatively low levels of miR-150 in effector CD8+ T cells may also be explained by intracellular Ca2+-associated events. Because miR-150 deficiency elevated intracellular Ca2+ levels, decreased levels of miR-150 in effector CD8+ T cells implies that effector CD8+ T cells may require higher intracellular Ca2+ concentrations to promote activity such as that of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). Previous reports showed that intracellular Ca2+ is involved in granule reorientation toward the target cell contact region and exocytosis of granules32–34. Additionally, intracellular Ca2+ mediates the production of effector cytokines and the expression of death receptor ligands35–37. To mediate these diverse functions associated with CTLs, high intracellular Ca2+ concentrations may be required, which might be satisfied by miR-150 downregulation in effector CD8+ T cells.
miR-150 acts as a “fine tuner” of various immune cells. In B cells, miR-150 controls differentiation and receptor signaling38–40. In natural killer cells, miR-150 regulates development, as well as cytotoxicity24, 41. T cell differentiation and the expression of cytokine receptors are also influenced by miR-15011, 31. Here, we showed that miR-150 controlled Ca2+ signaling and prevented the induction of anergy in naïve CD8+ T cells. Considering these various roles for miR-150 in immune cells and various target molecules, studies to determine additional miR-150 roles in the immune system will likely shed light on currently undefined mechanisms as well as possible therapeutic approaches using CD8+ T cells.
Given the impact of miR-150 on CD8+ T cell activation, regulation of miR-150 expression may be a therapeutic target in CD8+ T cell-associated diseases. Because we showed that mir-150 −/− naïve CD8+ T cells could not be activated, CD8+ T cell-specific suppression of miR-150 expression may be a novel approach to treating autoimmune diseases. In this context, our findings indicate a molecular mechanism that prevents the transition of CD8+ T cells into a hypo-responsive state, as well as a basis for regulation of CD8+ T cell activation.
Methods
Mice
TCRgag transgenic mice have been generated as previously described42. C57BL/6 (B6) mice and mir-150 −/− mice on a B6 background were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory and TCRgag:mir-150 +/+ and TCRgag:mir-150 −/− mice were generated in our animal facility. All mice were bred and maintained under Specific Pathogen Free conditions. All of the methods and experimental procedures were conducted according to the approved (approval ID: KRIBB-AEC-15088) guidelines and regulations by the animal ethics committee (IACUC) of KRIBB, South Korea.
Cell lines
The Friend virus-induced erythroleukemia of B6 origin, FBL, expresses the FMuLV-encoded gag epitope (peptide CCLCLTVFL purchased from Pi Proteomics), and was maintained in culture in RPMI1460 supplemented with 10% FBS and antibiotics. NIH3T3 cells for plasmid transfection were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and antibiotics.
Expansion of effector TCRgag CD8+ T cells in vitro
TCRgag:mir-150 +/+ and TCRgag:mir-150 −/− CD8+ T cells (1 × 106) were cultured with irradiated syngeneic splenocytes (5 × 106), irradiated FBL-gag leukemia (3 × 106), and IL-2 (20 U/ml) in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 2 μM glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin, 10% FCS, and 30 μM 2-mercaptoethanol. Effector CD8+ T cells after five days following antigen stimulation were used in various assays or transferred for adoptive immunotherapy.
T cell proliferation in vivo
Thy1.1+ CD8+ donor cells (1 × 106) from TCRgag:mir-150 +/+ and TCRgag:mir-150 −/− mice were transferred into Thy1.2+ B6 recipients. At one day after the transfer, the mice were injected with recombinant attenuated (ΔactA, ΔinlB) Listeria monocytogenes expressing the FMuLV GAG epitope (CCLCLTVFL) (Lm-gag) or a control vector (Lm-Ø) (kindly provided by Aduro BioTech, Inc) intraperitoneally. T cell persistence and proliferation were monitored in peripheral blood.
Immunofluorescence
Glass coverslips-attached cells were stimulated with CaCl2, PMA/Ionomycin, and anti-CD3 for indicated time points, washed using PBS, fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde for 10 min at 37 °C, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 for 10 min at room temperature, washed, and then blocked in 1% BSA in PBS for 30 min. To visualize NFAT1, the cells were stained with anti-NFAT1 (Abcam) for 1 h, washed and incubated with FITC-conjugated anti-mouse antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 1 h. Images were captured with an Olympus DP30BW digital camera and processed using the Metamorph 7.1 program (Universal Imaging, Media, PA, USA). Nuclear translocation of NFAT1 was measured by percentage of NFAT1 localized in the nucleus.
Adoptive immunotherapy of disseminated FBL leukemia
B6 mice were injected with FBL-gag leukemia cells (5 × 106) intraperitoneally (i.p.) as described16. At 5 days later, mice received cytoxan (Cyt; 180 mg/kg, R&D systems) i.p., and 6 h later, received TCRgag:mir-150 +/+ or mir-150 −/− effector CD8+ T cells intravenously.
Measurement of intracellular Ca2+ in CD8+ T cells
CD8+ T cells were loaded with 2 μM fura-2/AM (Life Technologies) for 20 min at 37 °C and attached to poly-L-lysine treated glass cover slips loaded in a Chamlide magnetic chamber (Live Cell Instrument) under Ca2+-free HSBB medium. The fura-2 loaded cells were perfused using HBSS medium containing 2 mM Ca2+. Cell images were obtained on a Zeiss Axio Observer.Z1 epifluorescence microscope. Fura-2 emission was detected at 510 nm after excitation at 340 and 380 nm. In some experiments, biotin-conjugated anti-CD3 (5 μg/ml, 2C11, BioXCell), anti-CD28 (5 μg/ml, 37.51, BioXCell) and streptavidin (10 μg/ml, Thermo Scientific) were added at the indicated time. To measure intracellular Ca2+ concentration in the CRAC, PMCA, SERCA, or MCU inhibited conditions, CD8+ T cells were pre-treated with specific inhibitors as below and measured intracellular Ca2+ levels as described above. CRAC inhibitor: 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate (2-APB, 100 uM, Sigma-Aldrich), PMCA inhibitors: La3+ (0.3, 0.5 or 1 mM, Sigma-Aldrich) and 5(6)-carboxyeosin (20 uM, AXXORA), SERCA inhibitor: thapsigargin (1 µM, Sigma-Aldrich), MCU inhibitor: sodium cyanide (3 mM, Sigma-Aldrich) + oligomycin (2 µg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich). For NCX inhibition, Na-free media (ThermoScientific) was used. Acquired time-lapse images and Fura 340/380 ratio images were analyzed with ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health) and Metamorph (Molecular Devices).
Flow cytometry
All antibodies for flow cytometric analysis were purchased from Becton Dickinson or BD Pharmingen. CD8+ T cells were stained with the indicated antibodies in a staining buffer (PBS containing 1% FBS and 0.01% NaN3) for 20 minutes at 4 °C. After washing, flow cytometry was performed on a BD FACS Canto II and data analyzed with FlowJo software (Tree Star).
Immunoblot analysis
Cytoplasmic lysates of CD8+ T cells were extracted with PBS containing 1% NP-40 and complete proteinase inhibitor (Roche). Immunoblot analyses were performed with primary antibodies purchased from Abcam (anti-ITCH and anti-Egr2), Cell Signaling (anti-Calcineurin A, anti-NFAT1, anti-p27, and anti-STIM1), Santa Cruz Biotech (anti-Calcineurin B, anti-Cbl-b, anti-SHP-1, and anti-TMEM20), GenTex (anti-Orai1), Thermo Scientific (anti-P2X7) and AbFRONTIER (anti-GAPDH) and gifted from Dr. Klein DC (anti-AANAT). The secondary antibodies were visualized using an Immobilon Western kit (MILLIPORE).
Reverse transcription and quantitative PCR
Total RNA extracted with TRIzol (Invitrogen) was reverse transcribed with Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase and oligo-d(T). For real-time qPCR, cDNA was amplified with specific primers and SYBR Premix Ex Taq (Takara Bio) on a Dice TP800 Thermal Cycler (Takara Bio). The mRNA levels are presented relative to expression of GAPDH mRNA. Quantitative real-time PCR of mature miR was performed with a TaqMan MicroRNA Assay kit (Applied Biosystems) as previously described23, 24. miR expressions are presented relative to the level of U6 small nuclear RNA.
mRNA array and data analysis
To collect naïve, effector, and memory CD8+ T cells, mice infected with Lm-gag as described in “T cell proliferation in vivo”, samples were isolated from the spleen at day 0, 5, and 50 after Lm-gag infection, respectively, and analyzed the phenotype of each samples (naïve: CD8+CD44loCD62Lhi, effector: CD8+CD44hiCD62Llo, and memory: CD8+CD44hiCD62Lhi). Labeling of target mRNAs and hybridization were performed using Agilent’s mRNA Labeling Reagent and Hybridization Kit (Agilent Technology) as manufacturer’s instruction. The hybridization images were analyzed with an Agilent DNA microarray Scanner and quantified by using Agilent Feature Extraction software. Normalization and selection of all data were performed by using GeneSpring GX 7.3 (Agilent Technology). For microarray data, genes were filtered with removing flag-out genes in each experiment. In the gene expression microarray, intensity-dependent normalization (LOWESS) was performed, where the ratio was reduced to the residual of the Lowess fit of the intensity vs. ratio curve. The averages of normalized ratios were calculated by dividing the average of normalized signal channel intensity by the average of normalized control channel intensity. Functional annotation of genes was performed according to Gene OntologyTM Consortium (http://www.geneontology.org/index.shtml) by GeneSpring GX 7.3. Gene classification was based on searches done by GeneCards (http://www.genecards.org/), miRanda (http://www.microrna.org/), DAVID (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/), and Medline databases (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The microarray data can be accessed from the Gene Expression Omnibus under the accession GSE62262.
Plasmids and Reporter assay
To construct chimeric reporter plasmids pcAANAT-TMEM20, 3′UTR of the mouse TMEM20 was amplified by DNA polymerase (TAKARA) using specific primers (forward: 5′-AAGAATTCTGAAGTGTCACTGCTGA-3′ and reverse: 5′-AACTCGAGAGTTGTAAAACCCA-ACA-3′) and confirmed by sequencing. For AANAT reporter assays, NIH3T3 cells were co-transfected with 1 µg of pcAANAT- TMEM20 plasmids with one of either the miR-150 mimics, miR-150 mutants, or the non-targeting control (BiONEER) at concentrations of 50~100 nM using TransIT-X2 (Mirus Bio LLC). Transfected cells were further grown for 48 h before harvesting.
Co-localization measurement of STIM1, PMEM20, and PMCA
Isolated CD8+ T cells were incubated in the presence of 2 mM of Ca2+, fixed with paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich), permeabilized using Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich) and stained with anti-PMCA (Abcam), anti-TMEM20 (SantaCruz Biotechnology) or anti-STIM1 (Cell Signaling Technology) antibody. Then the samples were stained with anti-rabbit IgG-Alex Fluor® 488, anti-rabbit-IgG-Alex Fluor® 546 or IgG-Alex Fluor® 647 (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) for PMCA, STIM1 or TMEM20, respectively. The images were obtained using LSM 510 META Laser Scanning Microscopes (Carl Zeiss).
Retrovirus preparation and transduction
pMXs-miR-GFP/puro retroviral expression vector was purchased from Cell Biolabs, Inc. To generate pMXs-miR-150-GFP, miR-150 was amplified by RT-PCR from splenocyte using primers as below: miR-150 forward primer containing XhoI site, 5′-TCG ACT CGA GAC AGG AAC CCC CTC CCT CAG C-3′; miR-150 reverse primer with XhoI site, 5′-TCG ACT CGA GGG AAG GGA CCC AAG GCA TCC C-3′. The amplified PCR product was cloned into pMXs-miR-GFP/puro after treatment with XhoI restriction enzyme. Retroviruses were generated using TransIT transfection reagents and Platinum-E retroviral packing cell line as manufacturer’ protocol (Mirus Bio Corp., Madison, WI). To add-back miR-150 to CD8+ T cells, 1 × 106 CD8+ T cells were transduced with multiplicity of infection of 10 of retro-miR-150-GFP or retro-miR-GFP with polybrene (8 μg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich) and IL-2 (10 U/mL, R&D systems). To measure the expression levels of anergy related genes after miR-150 add-back, CD8+ T cells were harvested at 2 d after virus infection and GFP-positive and negative populations were sorted using a FACS Aria cell sorter (BD Biosciences) and performed qPCR. For measurement of granzyme B, cyclin B1 and Blimp1, sorted GFP-positive and negative populations were incubated with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 (Life Technology) for 4 h, and PCR performed.
TMEM20 knock-down study
For TMEM20 knockdown, isolated mir-150 −/− naïve CD8+ T cells were transfected with 300 pmol of siRNA (none, control, or TMEM20: CGCTGGAGTGATACTTATCGTGAGACCAC) using Amaxa nucleofector (Lonza). At 48 hr after transfection, the cells were harvested and used to measure TMEM20 mRNA levels and intracellular Ca2+ levels as described above.
Statistical analysis
Bar graphs are displayed as mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses were performed with Prism version 5.0 (GraphPad Software) using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test or Kaplan-Meier log-rank test for survival analysis. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
We thank Byung-Chang Suh (Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology) and Yousang Gwack (University of California, Los Angeles) for expert technical assistance and experimental discussion, respectively. This work was supported in part by grants from the GRL project (FGM1401223) funded by the Korean Foundation of International Cooperation of Science and Technology (KICOS), the Basic Science Research Program (2016R1A2B4014230) of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), and the R&D Convergence Program of National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST) of Republic of Korea (CRC-15-02-KRIBB).
Author Contributions
T.D.K. designed experiments, performed research, analyzed results, and wrote the manuscript; H.R.J. and S.H.S. performed experiments and wrote the manuscript; S.C.O., Y.B., X.T., J.M.K., S.H.L., and D.S.K. performed experiments; H.J., Y.J.P., S.R.Y., J.D., and S.J.H. interpreted experimental results; and I.C. and P.D.G. supervised the project and wrote the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Tae-Don Kim, Hong-Ryul Jung and Sang-Hwan Seo contributed equally to this work.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41598-017-02697-x
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Tae-Don Kim, Email: tdkim@kribb.re.kr.
Inpyo Choi, Email: ipchoi@kribb.re.kr.
Philip D. Greenberg, Email: pgreen@u.washington.edu
References
- 1.Schwartz RH. T cell anergy. Annual review of immunology. 2003;21:305–334. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.141110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kuklina EM. Molecular mechanisms of T-cell anergy. Biochemistry. Biokhimiia. 2013;78:144–156. doi: 10.1134/S000629791302003X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zheng Y, Zha Y, Driessens G, Locke F, Gajewski TF. Transcriptional regulator early growth response gene 2 (Egr2) is required for T cell anergy in vitro and in vivo. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2012;209:2157–2163. doi: 10.1084/jem.20120342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Boussiotis VA, et al. p27kip1 functions as an anergy factor inhibiting interleukin 2 transcription and clonal expansion of alloreactive human and mouse helper T lymphocytes. Nature medicine. 2000;6:290–297. doi: 10.1038/73144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Macian F, et al. Transcriptional mechanisms underlying lymphocyte tolerance. Cell. 2002;109:719–731. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00767-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fracchia KM, Pai CY, Walsh CM. Modulation of T Cell Metabolism and Function through Calcium Signaling. Frontiers in immunology. 2013;4:324. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Park CY, et al. STIM1 clusters and activates CRAC channels via direct binding of a cytosolic domain to Orai1. Cell. 2009;136:876–890. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ritchie MF, Samakai E, Soboloff J. STIM1 is required for attenuation of PMCA-mediated Ca2+ clearance during T-cell activation. The EMBO journal. 2012;31:1123–1133. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Krapivinsky G, Krapivinsky L, Stotz SC, Manasian Y, Clapham DE. POST, partner of stromal interaction molecule 1 (STIM1), targets STIM1 to multiple transporters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108:19234–19239. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117231108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 2009;136:215–233. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ghisi M, et al. Modulation of microRNA expression in human T-cell development: targeting of NOTCH3 by miR-150. Blood. 2011;117:7053–7062. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-12-326629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Smith NL, Wissink EM, Grimson A, Rudd B. D. miR-150 Regulates Differentiation and Cytolytic Effector Function in CD8+ T cells. Scientific reports. 2015;5:16399. doi: 10.1038/srep16399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wu H, et al. miRNA profiling of naive, effector and memory CD8 T cells. PLoS One. 2007;2:e1020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gwack Y, Feske S, Srikanth S, Hogan PG, Rao A. Signalling to transcription: store-operated Ca2+ entry and NFAT activation in lymphocytes. Cell calcium. 2007;42:145–156. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2007.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Heissmeyer V, et al. Calcineurin imposes T cell unresponsiveness through targeted proteolysis of signaling proteins. Nature immunology. 2004;5:255–265. doi: 10.1038/ni1047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Stromnes IM, et al. Abrogating Cbl-b in effector CD8(+) T cells improves the efficacy of adoptive therapy of leukemia in mice. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2010;120:3722–3734. doi: 10.1172/JCI41991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Safford M, et al. Egr-2 and Egr-3 are negative regulators of T cell activation. Nature immunology. 2005;6:472–480. doi: 10.1038/ni1193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hebeisen M, et al. SHP-1 phosphatase activity counteracts increased T cell receptor affinity. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2013;123:1044–1056. doi: 10.1172/JCI65325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Luterbacher S, Schatzmann HJ. The site of action of La3+ in the reaction cycle of the human red cell membrane Ca2+ -pump ATPase. Experientia. 1983;39:311–312. doi: 10.1007/BF01955322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gatto C, Milanick MA. Inhibition of the red blood cell calcium pump by eosin and other fluorescein analogues. Am J Physiol. 1993;264:C1577–1586. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1993.264.6.C1577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Quintana A, et al. T cell activation requires mitochondrial translocation to the immunological synapse. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2007;104:14418–14423. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703126104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Feske S. Calcium signalling in lymphocyte activation and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7:690–702. doi: 10.1038/nri2152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kim TD, et al. Human microRNA-27a* targets Prf1 and GzmB expression to regulate NK-cell cytotoxicity. Blood. 2011;118:5476–5486. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-04-347526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kim N, et al. MicroRNA-150 regulates the cytotoxicity of natural killers by targeting perforin-1. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;134:195–203. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.02.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zheng Y, Zha Y, Gajewski TF. Molecular regulation of T-cell anergy. EMBO reports. 2008;9:50–55. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7401138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Srinivasan M, Frauwirth KA. Peripheral tolerance in CD8+ T cells. Cytokine. 2009;46:147–159. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2009.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Balasubramanyam M, Rohowsky-Kochan C, Reeves JP, Gardner JP. Na+/Ca2+ exchange-mediated calcium entry in human lymphocytes. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1994;94:2002–2008. doi: 10.1172/JCI117553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li L, Iwamoto Y, Berezovskaya A, Boussiotis VA. A pathway regulated by cell cycle inhibitor p27Kip1 and checkpoint inhibitor Smad3 is involved in the induction of T cell tolerance. Nature immunology. 2006;7:1157–1165. doi: 10.1038/ni1398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Liu DZ, et al. MIR-150 promotes prostate cancer stem cell development via suppressing p27Kip1. European review for medical and pharmacological sciences. 2015;19:4344–4352. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wu Q, et al. MiR-150 promotes gastric cancer proliferation by negatively regulating the pro-apoptotic gene EGR2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;392:340–345. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.12.182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Trifari S, et al. MicroRNA-directed program of cytotoxic CD8+ T-cell differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:18608–18613. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317191110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kuhne MR, et al. Linker for activation of T cells, zeta-associated protein-70, and Src homology 2 domain-containing leukocyte protein-76 are required for TCR-induced microtubule-organizing center polarization. Journal of immunology. 2003;171:860–866. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.2.860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Huse M, Lillemeier BF, Kuhns MS, Chen DS, Davis MM. T cells use two directionally distinct pathways for cytokine secretion. Nature immunology. 2006;7:247–255. doi: 10.1038/ni1304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Takayama H, Sitkovsky MV. Antigen receptor-regulated exocytosis in cytotoxic T lymphocytes. The Journal of experimental medicine. 1987;166:725–743. doi: 10.1084/jem.166.3.725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Calzascia T, et al. TNF-alpha is critical for antitumor but not antiviral T cell immunity in mice. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2007;117:3833–3845. doi: 10.1172/JCI32567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chavez-Galan L, Arenas-Del Angel MC, Zenteno E, Chavez R, Lascurain R. Cell death mechanisms induced by cytotoxic lymphocytes. Cellular & molecular immunology. 2009;6:15–25. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2009.3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mahmood Z, Shukla Y. Death receptors: targets for cancer therapy. Experimental cell research. 2010;316:887–899. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Xiao C, et al. MiR-150 controls B cell differentiation by targeting the transcription factor c-Myb. Cell. 2007;131:146–159. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhou B, Wang S, Mayr C, Bartel DP, Lodish H. F. miR-150, a microRNA expressed in mature B and T cells, blocks early B cell development when expressed prematurely. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2007;104:7080–7085. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702409104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mraz M, et al. miR-150 influences B-cell receptor signaling in chronic lymphocytic leukemia by regulating expression of GAB1 and FOXP1. Blood. 2014;124:84–95. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-09-527234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bezman NA, Chakraborty T, Bender T, Lanier L. L. miR-150 regulates the development of NK and iNKT cells. J Exp Med. 2011;208:2717–2731. doi: 10.1084/jem.20111386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ohlen C, et al. CD8(+) T cell tolerance to a tumor-associated antigen is maintained at the level of expansion rather than effector function. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2002;195:1407–1418. doi: 10.1084/jem.20011063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.