Abstract
Novel nanocomposites comprised of bacterial cellulose (BC) with carboxylic multi-walled carbon nanotubes (c-MWCNTs) incorporated into the BC matrix were prepared through a simple method of biosynthesis. The biocathode and bioanode for the enzyme biological fuel cell (EBFC) were prepared using BC/c-MWCNTs composite injected by laccase (Lac) and glucose oxidase (GOD) with the aid of glutaraldehyde (GA) crosslinking. Biosynthesis of BC/c-MWCNTs composite was characterized by digital photos, scanning electron microscope (SEM), and Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR). The experimental results indicated the successful incorporation of c-MWCNTs into the BC. The electrochemical and biofuel performance were evaluated by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and linear sweep voltammetry (LSV). The power density and current density of EBFCs were recorded at 32.98 µW/cm3 and 0.29 mA/cm3, respectively. Additionally, the EBFCs also showed acceptable stability. Preliminary tests on double cells indicated that renewable BC have great potential in the application field of EBFCs.
Keywords: bacterial cellulose, carbon nanotubes, laccase, glucose oxidase, enzyme biological fuel cell
1. Introduction
More attention has been increasingly paid to eco-friendly materials because of an increased awareness of sustainable development and environmental protection [1]. Nowadays, enzymatic biofuel cells (EBFCs) as the new green energy devices have drawn much attention because they are capable of harvesting electricity from renewable and abundantly available sources by using enzymes as the catalysts for oxidation of biofuels (most commonly, glucose) and reduction of oxidizers (most commonly, oxygen) [2,3]. They are renewable energy without any harmful intermediates and side products. Most EBFCs cathodes involve the four-electron reduction of O2 to water [4].
O2 + 4H+ + 4e− → 2H2O | (1) |
Due to the fact that active centers of the enzymes are usually buried inside the protein matrix, electron transfer to the electrodes has been of crucial importance for EBFC performance [5]. Many types of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have, therefore, been widely used as conductive nanowires in facilitating electron transfer from the catalytic centers of enzymes to the electrode surface because of their unique properties of being chemically inert with excellent conductivity, their electro-chemical stability, and molecular dimensions that enable intimate interaction with the enzymes [6,7,8]. These unique properties of CNTs make them extremely attractive for electrochemical applications, protein electrochemistry, electrochemical sensors, and especially for biosensors or biofuel [9,10]. In the bioelectronics field, CNTs have been used as supports for enzyme immobilization to enable direct electron transfer because of their large specific surface area and good conductivity [11].
Bacterial cellulose (BC), synthesized by Acetobacter xylinum, is a green, economical, and low-cost biopolymer [12]. As a general material, BC has distinctive properties including high ultrafine porosity, three-dimentional web-like structure, high crystallinity, water absorbance, mechanical properties, and biocompatibility, which makes it versatile in terms of application in many fields such as paper and paper-based products, audio components, tissue engineering, food, and electronic industries [13,14], as well as stretchable conductors [15], lithium ion battery anodes [16], conductive and fire-resistant aerogels [17]. Furthermore, the hydroxyl groups on its backbone can provide BC with a high hydrophilicity, which is crucial for the operation of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells [18]. However, these methods are not convenient to apply because they require additional time consuming, energy-intensive, or expensive steps, such as pyrolization at very high temperatures with the application of curing agents or chemical modification. Post-treatments have been carried out on cellulose to prepare a composite film of cellulose and reduced graphene for applications in supercapacitors [19], and flexible and conductive films [20].
In this work, biosynthesis of BC/carboxylic multi-walled carbon nanotubes (c-MWCNTs) in agitated culture were used as both bioanode and biocathode in EBFCs (Figure 1). The biocathode and bioanode were prepared and the BC/c-MWCNTs were injected with laccase (Lac) and glucose oxidase (GOD) by glutaraldehyde (GA) crosslinking, respectively. This new membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) method offers theoretical and technological supports for exploiting high-efficient EBFCs.
2. Experimental Materials and Procedures
2.1. Chemicals
The industrial laccase powder (3 U/mg) from Trametes was purchased from Wuhan Nuohui Pharmaceutical And Chemical Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, Hubei, China); the industrial glucose oxidase (800 U/mg) was obtained Henan Huakang Chemical Co., Ltd. (Zhenzhou, Henan, China); the c-MWCNTs (OD, <8 nm; Length, 0.5–2 μm; Purity, >95%) was supplied by Nanjing XFNANO Materials Tech Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, Jiangsu, China), and glutaraldehyde was purchased from Henan Huakang Chemical Co., Ltd. (Zhenzhou, Henan, China).
2.2. Preparation of BC/c-MWCNTs Composite
First, c-MWCNTs were dispersed in culture media containing 2.5% (w/v) D-mannitol, 0.5% (w/v) yeast, 0.3% (w/v) bacto-peptone [21]. These culture media were sterilized at 120 °C in an autoclave for 2 h and poured into Erlenmeyer flasks. The bacterium was cultured on Hestrin and Schramm (HS) (5% (w/v) glucose, 1.6% (w/v) bacto-peptone, 0.2% (w/v) citric acid, 0.2% (w/v) disodium hydrogen phosphate, 0.3% (w/v) potassium dihydrogen phosphate, 0.03% (w/v) magnesium sulfate) medium [22] by static incubation. The pre-cultured cells in a test tube containing small cellulose particles on the surface of the medium were inoculated into a 100 mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 10 mL of the HS medium (in the presence of final 0.01 w/v% c-MWCNTs in culture media). The flasks were incubated on a rotary shaker operating at rotational speed of 100 rpm, for 6 days at 30 °C. The synthesized cellulose was separated from the medium by filtration and were dipped into 1% sodium hydroxide solution for 2 h at 80 °C in order to eliminate the cells and medium embedded in the cellulose material, then rinsed three times to pH 7 in deionized water [23].
2.3. Preparation of Enzyme Electrode
The biocathode was prepared by the following method: BC/c-MWCNTs were injected by 40 mg mL−1 Lac with 1.5% (v/v) GA in 0.1 M acetic acid/sodium acetate buffer (pH = 5.5) solution for 1 h. The bioanode was prepared by similar method except that the 40 mg mL−1 Lac was replaced by 20 mg mL−1 GOD. Then, the electrode was dipped into 0.1 M acetic acid/sodium acetate buffer (pH = 5.5) solution containing 50 mM glucose, as shown in Figure 2.
2.4. Characterization and Electrochemical Measurements
The morphology of the BC and BC/c-MWCNTs composite membranes surfaces were characterized by field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM, S-4800, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The morphology of the BC was also characterized by high-resolution transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEOL/JEM-2100, Tokyo, Japan). Dried BC and BC/c-MWCNTs composite were placed over aluminum support and sputtered with gold. The samples were coated with a thin layer of Au nanoparticles to reduce the charging effects before FESEM observation.
The pure BC, c-MWCNTs, and BC/c-MWCNTs composite membranes were prepared in KBr pellet and scanned with Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer (FTIR, Nicolet NEXUS, Hillsboro, OR, USA).
Electrochemical measurements were performed using a CHI 660D electrochemical workstation (CH Instruments, Inc., Austin, TX, USA). The electrochemical response was measured in a conventional three-electrode system using BC/c-MWCNTs/Lac and BC/c-MWCNTs/GOD as working electrode, a Pt wire auxiliary electrode and the Ag/AgCl as reference electrode. The electrocatalytic activity of bioanode material was tested toward oxygen reduction reaction in 0.1 M sodium acetate/acetic acid buffer solution (pH 5.5). The electrochemical measurements were carried out at around 25 °C.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Culture Process Characterization
Figure 3 illustrates a six-day track of bacterial cellulose growth in presence of c-MWCNTs under agitated culture. Firstly, G. xylinus was inoculated into the culture media contain c-MWCNTs. On the first day, culture solution fully presented black color as shown in Figure 3, but it could be seen that the color faded with the increasing number of days, revealing only a single black bacterial cellulose in the culture solution indicating the incorporation of c-MWCNTs into the bacterial cellulose. On the sixth day, the culture solution became clearer (similar to the original culture color), indicating the incorporation of remaining c-MWCNTs into BC pallet. The sixth day growth of bacterial cellulose in the absence of c-WMCNTs presented a white cryptomere structure.
Figure 4 displays schematic illustration of the formation of bacterial cellulose and the integration of c-MWCNTs into the 3D interconnected fibrous network of BC. Firstly, c-MWCNTs were dispersed into culture solution and then the free bacteria was attached to the surface bubbles which apparently underwent reproduction to synthesize bacterial cellulose fibers [24]. As the days increased, the bacterial cellulose attached itself to the c-MWCNTs to form a more compact structure [25]. Due to the growth of the bacterial cellulose in the presence of c-MWCNTs under agitated conditions, the bacterial cellulose and c-MWCNTs entangled with each other and gradually gathered for the dispersion of c-MWCNTs in culture solution. It was again observed that due to the slow rate of BC-formation, c-MWCNTs was, therefore, absorbed on the BC whiles the bacteria gathered around the BC/c-MWCNTs composite and produced BC fibrils. The formation of new BC fibrils on existing composite was continuous until a more compact, irregularly shaped, and randomly overlapped composite was obtained.
3.2. Morphology Analysis
The microstructure of BC was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Figure 5a shows pure BC fibrils with ultrafine nanofiber structure, high ultrafine porosity 3D web-like structure. As shown in Figure 5a, BC revealed interconnecting pores which is in agreement with the report of refference [26]. The ultrafine network structure and larger specific surface area provided favourable channels for O2 transmission. The high-resolution TEM image further revealed that these nanofibers were mainly consisted of randomly orientated 3D web-like structure (Figure 5b) [27]. Figure 5c showed that c-MWCNTs was absorbed on 3D BC fibrils in which c-MWCNTs displayed the phenomenon of aggregation. As shown in Figure 5d, the morphology of BC/c-MWCNTs samples revealed that c-MWCNTs were tightly wrapped in BC pellicle resulting in an spherical shaped structure.
3.3. FTIR Analysis
Figure 6 shows the FT-IR spectra of the pure BC c-MWCNTs and BC/c-MWCNTs. The band at 3465 cm−1 for c-MWCNTs was attributed to the presence of hydroxyl groups(-OH) [28], as shown in Figure 6b. The absorption band at 1659 cm−1 for c-MWCNTs was assigned to the presence of carboxyl functional groups (C=O) which was in agreement with references [29,30]. The absorption band at 2973 cm−1 for BC(Figure 6a)was also attributed to the presence of C-H stretching vibrations which was in agreement with the characteristic bands of BC reported in the literature [31]. The main difference in the spectra of BC and BC/c-MWCNTs was found at the absorption peak of 3465 cm−1, as shown in Figure 6c. The peak at 3465 cm−1 for BC/c-MWCNTs composite membranes were enhanced, suggesting that only physical interaction occurred between BC and c-MWCNTs.
3.4. Effect of Different Conditions on Power Output of the EBFC
3.4.1. The Influence of Different Glucose Concentrations
Figure 7a displays the maximum power output of the EBFC with different glucose concentration ranging from 15 mM to 70 mM. Figure 6a shows relatively higher power output in lower concentrations region (15–50 mM); however, when the glucose concentration further increased, the power output greatly decreased. In general, the power output showed a relatively higher enzyme activity among the range of 30–55 mM with an optimum concentration of about 50 mM.
3.4.2. The Influence of Different pH
The biofuel cells were incubated in buffer solution with pH ranging from 3 to 7 at room temperature (Figure 7b). The immobilized laccase and glucose oxidase on BC/c-MWCNTs showed relatively higher pH stability. Additionally, the immobilized enzyme on BC/c-MWCNTs composite showed a relatively higher activity among the range of pH 4–6, and the optimum pH was around 5.5, as shown in Figure 7b.
3.4.3. The Influence of Different Temperature
The effect of temperature on power density of immobilized enzyme on BC/c-MWCNTs is shown in Figure 7c. The immobilized enzyme was incubated in buffer solution (pH 5.5) for 5 min at different temperatures varying from 15 to 75 °C. Figure 7c shows relatively higher activity retention in lower temperature region (30–50 °C), however when the temperature further increased, power output greatly decreased indicating the decrease of enzyme activity. The immobilized enzymes showed a higher enzyme activity among 45–60 °C with an optimum temperature at 55 °C. In general, the immobilized enzyme possessed high activity in a broader temperature range, enabling it a desirable material for enzymatic biofuel cells application and many other fields.
3.5. Electrochemical Behavior of the Lac/BC/c-MWCNTs Electrode
As shown in Figure 8a, the CVs of the BC/c-MWCNTs/Lac electrode were absent, whereas a pair of prominent redox peaks (at 0.74 V and 0.11 V, respectively) can be observed [32], which was attributed to the redox reaction of the Lac immobilized on the c-MWCNTs. This showed the good coupling between the enzymes and 3D BC/c-MWCNTs substrate. The redox of Lac on the electrode was a reversible and surface-confined process, which could be demonstrated by the linear relationship between redox currents and scan rate, as shown in Figure 8b. The bare 3D BC/c-MWCNTs electrode showed no catalytic action to O2 in comparison with that of BC/c-MWCNTs/Lac electrode.
3.6. Performance of the Biofuel Cell
The EBFCs were fabricated with a 3D BC/c-MWCNTs/Lac cathode and 3D BC/c-MWCNTs/GOD anode by GA crosslinking. As demonstrated in Figure 9a, the of the EBFC was approximately 0.64 V. Through 30 days of open circuit voltage collected, a 51% decrease of open circuit voltage was observed indicating relatively satisfactory stability, as shown in Figure 9b. Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) was used to evaluate the electrochemical performance of enzymatic biofuel cell operating with glucose [33]. As shown in Figure 9c, the change of power density showed first increase and then a decrease with the decline of open circuit voltage whiles the open-circuit voltage was about 0.62 V which was relatively consistent with the biggest open circuit voltage in Figure 9a. The maximum current density was 0.29 mA/cm3 and the maximum power density was 32.98 µW/cm3 implying acceptable electric properties.
4. Conclusions
Lac and GOD were respectively immobilized on the BC/c-MWCNTs composite to prepare the cathode and anode of EBFCs. The nanotopographic surface of c-MWCNTs networks ensured snug anchoring of enzyme molecules by GA crosslinging. The influence of different concentrations, pH and temperature on the performance of EBFCs was investigated, and the optimum concentration, pH and temperature were 50 mM, 5.5, and 55 °C, respectively. The as-prepared EBFCs showed satisfactory electric properties. Our study demonstrated that the three-dimensional structure, controllable porosity as well as designable shape of BC could provide the application possibility in biofuel cell fields.
Acknowledgments
This research was financially supported by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51203064 and 21201083), the Natural Science Fundation of Jiangsu Province, Industry-Academia-Research Joint Innovation Fund of Jiangsu Province (BY2014023-4, BY2014023-23 and BY2014023-29), Six talent peaks project in Jiangsu Province (2014-XCL001), the Department of Education in Anhui Province of China (2015LJRCTD001), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2014M560391), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2015T80496).
Author Contributions
All authors contributed equally to this work.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Chen Z., Zhang S., Wu F., Yang W., Liu Z., Yang M. Motion mode of poly (lactic acid) chains in film during strain-induced crystallization. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015;133:42969–42978. doi: 10.1002/app.42969. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cooney M.J., Svoboda V., Lau C., Martin G., Minteer S.D. Enzyme catalysed biofuel cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2008;1:320–337. doi: 10.1039/b809009b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yang X.Y., Tian G., Jiang N., Su B.L. Immobilization technology: A sustainable solution for biofuel cell design. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012;5:5540–5563. doi: 10.1039/C1EE02391H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tsujimura S., Kamitaka Y., Kano K. Diffusion-Controlled Oxygen Reduction on Multi-Copper Oxidase-Adsorbed Carbon Aerogel Electrodes without Mediator. Fuel Cells. 2007;7:463–469. doi: 10.1002/fuce.200700032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Prasad K.P., Chen Y., Chen P. Three-dimensional graphene-carbon nanotube hybrid for high-performance enzymatic biofuel cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2014;6:3387–3393. doi: 10.1021/am405432b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Minteer S.D., Atanassov P., Luckarift H.R., Johnson G.R. New materials for biological fuel cells. Mater. Today. 2012;15:166–173. doi: 10.1016/S1369-7021(12)70070-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Feng W., Ji P.J. Enzymes immobilized on carbon nanotubes. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011;29:889–895. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Vashist S.K., Zheng D., Al-Rubeaan K., Luong J.H.T., Sheu F.S. Advances in carbon nanotube based electrochemical sensors for bioanalytical applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011;29:169–188. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gong K.P., Yan Y.M., Zhang M.N., Su L., Xiong S.X., Mao L.Q. Electrochemistry and electroanalytical applications of carbon nanotubes: A review. Anal. Sci. 2005;21:1383–1393. doi: 10.2116/analsci.21.1383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Baughman R.H., Zakhidov A.A., De Heer W.A. Carbon nanotubes-the route toward applications. Science. 2002;297:787–792. doi: 10.1126/science.1060928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhao C.E., Wang Y., Shi F.J., Zhang J.R., Zhu J.J. High biocurrent generation in Shewanella-inoculated microbial fuel cells using ionic liquid functionalized graphene nanosheets as an anode. Chem. Commun. 2013;49:6668–6670. doi: 10.1039/c3cc42068j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Klemm D., Schumann D., Udhardt U., Marsch S. Bacterial synthesized cellulose-artificial blood vessels for microsurgery. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2001;26:1561–1603. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00021-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Petersen N., Gatenholm P. Bacterial cellulose-based materials and medical devices: Current state and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 2011;91:1277–1286. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3432-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jonas R., Farah L.F. Production and application of microbial cellulose. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 1998;59:101–106. doi: 10.1016/S0141-3910(97)00197-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Liang H.W., Guan Q.F., Zhu Z., Song L.T., Yao H.B., Lei X., Yu S.H. Highly conductive and stretchable conductors fabricated from bacterial cellulose. NPG Asia Mater. 2012;4:e19. doi: 10.1038/am.2012.34. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wang B., Li X., Luo B., Yang J., Wang X., Song Q., Chen S., Zhi L. Pyrolyzed bacterial cellulose: A versatile support for lithium ion battery anode materials. Small. 2013;9:2399–2404. doi: 10.1002/smll.201300692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang M., Anoshkin I.V., Nasibulin A.G., Korhonen J.T., Jani S., Jaakko P., Kauppinen E.I., Ras R.H.A., Olli I. Modifying native nanocellulose aerogels with carbon nanotubes for mechanoresponsive conductivity and pressure sensing. Adv. Mater. 2013;25:2428–2432. doi: 10.1002/adma.201300256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wan Y., Creber K.A.M., Peppley B., Bui V.T. Chitosan-based solid electrolyte composite membranes I. Preparation and characterization. J. Membr. Sci. 2006;280:666–674. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.02.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ouyang W., Sun J., Memon J., Wang C., Geng J., Huang Y. Scalable preparation of three-dimensional porous structures of reduced graphene oxide/cellulose composites and their application in supercapacitors. Carbon. 2013;62:501–509. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.06.049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Feng Y., Zhang X., Shen Y., Yoshino K., Feng W. A mechanically strong, flexible and conductive film based on bacterial cellulose/graphene nanocomposite. Carbohyd. Polym. 2012;87:644–649. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Oikawa T., Ohtori T.M. Production of cellulose from d-mannitol by acetobacter xylinum ku-1. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1995;59:331–332. doi: 10.1271/bbb.59.331. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kuo C.H., Chen J.H., Liou B.K., Lee C.K. Utilization of acetate buffer to improve bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Food Hydrocoll. 2015;53:98–103. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.12.034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kiziltas E.E., Kiziltas A., Rhodes K., Emanetoglu N.W., Blumentritt M., Gardner D.J. Electrically conductive nano graphite-filled bacterial cellulose composites. Carbohyd. Polym. 2016;136:1144–1151. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Czaja W., Romanovicz D., Brown R.M. Structural investigations of microbial cellulose produced in stationary and agitated culture. Cellulose. 2004;11:403–411. doi: 10.1023/B:CELL.0000046412.11983.61. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nandgaonkar A.G., Wang Q., Fu K., Krause W.E., Wei Q., Gorga R., Lucia L.A. A one-pot biosynthesis of reduced graphene oxide (RGO)/bacterial cellulose (BC) nanocomposites. Green Chem. 2014;16:3195–3201. doi: 10.1039/c4gc00264d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Torres F.G., Commeaux S., Troncoso O.P. Biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose based biomaterials. J. Funct. Biomater. 2012;3:864–878. doi: 10.3390/jfb3040864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Parakalan K., Raed H., Mike T. Modified cellulose morphologies and its composites; SEM and TEM analysis. Micron. 2011;42:751–761. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2011.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yan Z.Y., Chen S.Y., Wang H.P., Wang B.A., Jiang J.M. Biosynthesis of bacterial cellulose/multi-walled carbon nanotubes in agitated culture. Carbohyd. Polym. 2008;74:659–665. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.04.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhao B., Hu H., Yu A.P., Perea D., Haddon R.C. Synthesis and characterization of water soluble single-walled carbon nanotube graft copolymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:8197–8203. doi: 10.1021/ja042924i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhou T., Chen D., Jiu J., Nge T.T., Sugahara T., Nagao S., Koga H., Nogi M., Suganuma K., Wang X., et al. Electrically conductive bacterial cellulose composite membranes produced by the incorporation of graphite nanoplatelets in pristine bacterial cellulose membranes. Express Polym. Lett. 2013;7:756–766. doi: 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2013.73. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rambo C.R., Recouvreux D.O.S., Carminatti C.A., Pitlovanciv A.K., Antonio R.V., Porto L.M. Template assisted synthesis of porous nanofibrous cellulose membranes for tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2008;28:549–554. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2007.11.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gavaghan D.J., Myland J.C., Oldham K.B. The effect of periodic modulation on the aperiodic current in linear-scan and cyclic voltammetries. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2001;516:2–9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0728(01)00659-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Li Y., Wu G., Cong R., Qi Z., Yan W., Doherty W., Xie K., Wu Y. Composite cathode based on doped vanadate enhanced with loaded metal nanoparticles for steam electrolysis. J. Power Sources. 2014;253:349–359. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]