Abstract
Workers of tanneries, welding industries, factories manufacturing chromate containing paints are exposed to hexavalent chromium that increases the risk of developing serious adverse health effects. This review elucidates the mode of action of hexavalent chromium on blood and its adverse effects. Both leukocyte and erythrocyte counts of blood sharply decreased in Swiss mice after two weeks of intraperitoneal treatment with Cr (VI), with the erythrocytes transforming into echinocytes. The hexavalent chromium in the blood is readily reduced to trivalent form and the reductive capacity of erythrocytes is much greater than that of plasma. Excess Cr (VI), not reduced in plasma, may enter erythrocytes and lymphocytes and in rodents it induces microcytic anemia. The toxic effects of chromium (VI) include mitochondrial injury and DNA damage of blood cells that leads to carcinogenicity. Excess Cr (VI) increases cytosolic Ca2+ activity and ATP depletion thereby inducing eryptosis. Se, vitamin C, and quercetin are assumed to have some protective effect against hexavalent chromium induced hematological disorders.
Keywords: hexavalent chromium; haematological disorders; haemolytic anaemia, chromium in blood
Introduction
Heavy metals are ubiquitous and persistent environmental pollutants that are generally introduced into the environment through anthropogenic activities (Achal et al., 2011). Chromium (Cr) is one of the toxic environmental pollutants released in the environment due to its wide use in industries such as tanning, corrosion control, plating, pigment manufacture and nuclear weapon production (Singh et al., 2013). The extensive industrial usage of Cr compounds and subsequent release of effluents, without proper treatment in the environment, contaminates the ecosystem and causes remarkable health problems.
Chromium exists in several oxidation states, with the most stable forms being trivalent chromium [Cr (III)] and hexavalent chromium [Cr (VI), chromates] species, with different chemical characteristics and biological effects (Nath et al., 2009). Of these two, water soluble hexavalent chromium is extremely irritating and toxic to tissues of the human body as the solubility promotes active transport of chromate across biological membranes (Cervantes et al., 2001). Once internalized by cells, it exhibits a variety of toxic, mutagenic, and carcinogenic effects (Ackerley et al., 2006). Tannery workers, welders, workers of pigments and paint industries are regularly exposed to hexavalent chromium that increases the risk of developing serious adverse health conditions. Occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium may induce a number of hematological disorders characterized by abnormal features of blood cells. The cytotoxic nature of Cr (VI) is well evident from the results of in vitro and in vivo studies in laboratory animal models and is comparable to that of the human system.
The present overview focuses on the morphological, biochemical and physiological effects of hexavalent chromium on mammalian blood, on the basis of observational evidence from altered hematological profiles of tannery workers and experimental animals.
Biomedical profiles
Workers in industries, with exposure primarily to Cr (VI) via inhalation of aerosols, are at the greatest risk of suffering adverse health effects. Repeated exposure to Cr (VI) compounds causes similar effects in both humans and laboratory animals, which include irritant and inflammatory effects on the respiratory system and immunological changes such as increased serum immunoglobulin and white blood cell count, as well as changes in the activities of alveolar macrophages and spleen lymphocytes (IPCS, 2006; ECB, 2005). Adverse health effects associated with longterm Cr (VI) exposure include occupational asthma, eye irritation and damage, perforated eardrums, respiratory irritation, kidney damage, liver damage, pulmonary congestion and edema, upper abdominal pain, nose irritation and damage, respiratory cancer, skin irritation, as well as erosion and discoloration of teeth. Some workers can also develop an allergic skin reaction, called allergic contact dermatitis, resulting from handling liquids or solids containing Cr (VI). Furthermore, contact with skin wound can lead to formation of crusted, painless lesions showing a pitted ulcer covered with fluid (De Flora, 2012), called chrome ulcer.
Increased blood chromium level after total hip replacement using metal-metal pairings cause the release of metal ions of the alloys (Schaffer & Pilger, 1999), which in turn produces a number of toxic manifestations. Short-term peak inhalation exposures to acute high concentration of Cr (VI) may block the reducing abilities of the body and can cause serious health effects (ATSDR, 2000), like respiratory irritation, asthma and gastrointestinal irritation. This picture is in agreement with the results of Langård and Nordhagen (I980) observed in laboratory animals subjected to whole-body exposure at high concentrations of hexavalent chromium. Occurrence of microcytic, hypochromic anemia was reported in several recent animal studies with chromium (VI) compounds. Hematological findings in humans exposed to lethal doses of chromium (VI) compounds were difficult to interpret in the context of multiple systemic effects leading to death, following hemorrhage.
Recent studies indicate a biological relevance of non-oxidative mechanisms in Cr(VI) carcinogenesis (Zhitkovich et al., 2001). The toxicity of chromium within the cell may result from damage to cellular components during the hexavalent to trivalent chromium reduction process by generation of free radicals, including DNA damage (ATSDR, 2000) Cr(VI). Once it is reduced intracellularly, it produces various forms of DNA damage including DNA interstrand cross links, DNA-protein crosslink, DNA strand breaks, and Cr-DNA adducts. This DNA damage presumably accounts for the observed functional changes in DNA replication and transcription, which may be crucial to the carcinogenicity of chromium (VI) compounds.
Toxicological profiles
In tanning industry, the chromium concentration in the exhaust chromium liquor volume discharged from the tanning process ranges from 1,500–5,000 mg/L, which by mixing with other effluent streams from the tannery process become 100–300 mg/L. As per international and Indian standards, wastewater effluents should not exceed 0.05 mg/L Cr(VI) (Jabari et al., 2009, Mythili & Karthikeyan, 2011).
According to Dana Devi et al. (2004) a person spends, on average, one-third of life at the workplace. Hence, the toxic effects of Cr (VI) in the blood of victims of occupational exposure are well reflected in their hematological conditions. Chromium concentration in erythrocytes was about two times higher in electroplating workers (4.41 μg/L) than that in control subjects (1.54 μg/L) (Zhang et al., 2011). Halasova et al. (2012) reported the level of chromium in the blood of welders regularly exposed to Cr (VI) to range between 0.032 and 0.182 μmol l−1, which was significantly higher than in controls. The study of Sellappa et al. (2011) suggested that chronic occupational exposure to Cr (VI) during welding could lead to increased levels of DNA damage and repair inhibition, which were depicted by the genotoxicity in lymphocytes of these welders.
Absorption and conversion of hexavalent chromium in blood
Cr (VI) is unstable in the body and is reduced intracellularly (by many substances including ascorbate and glutathione) providing very unstable pentavalent chromium and stable trivalent chromium. The erythrocyte has a high capacity for chromium (VI) uptake and binding. Cr (VI) enters the erythrocyte (Figure 1) through a sulfate ion channel; once inside the cell, it is rapidly reduced to reactive intermediates Cr (V) and Cr (IV)) and binds to the beta chain of human hemoglobin (Kerger et al., 1997) and other ligands like proteins and glutathione. The chromium-hemoglobin complex is stable and remains sequestered within the cell over the lifespan of the erythrocyte (Paustenbach et al., 2003).
Figure 1.
Schematic representation of cellular uptake of hexavalent chromium in red blood cells (Modified after Baduel. 2013. Figure 1. Schematic representation of cellular uptake of hexavalent chromium in red blood cells (Reprinted from Das & Singh, 2011).
Both these intermediates can change DNA (Baduel, 2013). RBC membranes are however relatively impermeable to cationic trivalent chromium and when varying amounts of radioactive Cr (III) were added to whole blood in vitro, almost all of the radioactivity (94–99%) remained in the plasma with an insignificant count retained in the RBC. Similar results were obtained in vivo (Afolaranmi et al., 2013).
Ingested Cr (VI) is efficiently reduced to Cr (III) by the gastric juices (De Flora, et al., 1987) and ascorbate (Samitz, 1970) plays an important role (ATSDR, 2000) in this conversion. Inhaled Cr (VI) can be reduced to Cr (III) in the epithelial lining fluid of the lungs by ascorbate and glutathione (Petrilli et al., 1986; Suzuki & Fukuda, 1990). According to Standeven & Wetterhahn (1989), Cr (VI) readily enters cells by diffusion through a nonspecific anion channel, whereas to Cr (III) the cells are relatively impermeable.
Thus if the amount of ingested Cr (VI) is higher than the reductive capacity of the gastrointestinal tract, both plasma and RBC chromium levels may be elevated for a few hours after ingestion, while RBC chromium levels may remain elevated for several weeks. In contrast, Cr (III) does not readily cross red blood cell membranes but binds directly to transferrin, an iron-transporting protein in the plasma (EPA, 1998; ATSDR, 2000; Dayan & Paine, 2001).
The cellular uptake of chromium was documented (Merritt and Brown, 1995) in red blood cells following corrosion of stainless-steel and cobalt-chromium implants in vivo, in red blood cells of patients undergoing total joint revisions and in fibroblasts, resulting in the release of the biologically active hexavalent chromium into the body. By applying the amberlite separation technique, Meriitt and Brown (1995) demonstrated that the hexavalent Cr in red blood cells was rapidly reduced to trivalent Cr. It was found that the excess Cr (VI) after being detoxified in saliva and sequestered by intestinal bacteria, if absorbed in the intestine, was efficiently reduced to its trivalent form and the efficient uptake and reduction of chromium(VI) in red blood cells reduced the chance of induction of cancer (De Flora, 2000).
Intra-tracheal instillation of 51CrCl3 in anesthetized rabbits resulted in its partial absorption in blood and confinement of the absorbed material in the plasma compartment and only trace amounts were deposited in liver and kidney. By contrast, after similar application of Na, 51CrO4 the bulk of blood radioactivity was detected from red blood cells (RBC) with substantial deposition in liver and kidneys, leading to the conclusion that Cr(VI), if it enters the body unreduced through the lung, will be partially deposited in cells over a prolonged period of time (Wiegand et al., 1987).
By monitoring the reaction of Cr (VI) with GSH in vitro, it was found that GSH reduced Cr (VI) without any cofactors. GSH was also found to facilitate Cr(VI) uptake by reducing Cr(VI) to Cr(III) after entering the cell, presumably keeping intracellular Cr(VI) concentration low and allowing for further Cr(VI) uptake (Standeven and Wetterhahn, 1989). Some other nonenzymatic factors, like ascorbate and riboflavin, cytochrome P-450, DT-diaphorase and the mitochondrial electron transport chain complexes, are capable of reducing Cr (VI) in vitro but their contribution in vivo is not clear.
Biological monitoring for hexavalent chromium
The most reliable and direct way to measure the extent and the effect of hexavalent chromium exposure is to measure the Cr (VI) content of the RBCs and plasma, where chromium RBC levels provide information regarding exposure to Cr(VI) and chromium plasma levels can be useful for evaluating recent exposure to Cr(III) and Cr(VI) compounds. The concentration of chromium within the red cell depends upon inherent genetic polymorphisms (NIOSH, 2002).
Cr(VI) ions, taken by inhalation or percutaneously, are carried in blood plasma and usually penetrate into the erythrocytes depending on the concentration. The erythrocytes become an easily accessible target organ for quantitative chromium determination after occupational exposure to Cr(VI) compounds for intracellular reduction to Cr(III) and the concurrent intracellular protein binding.
Although the blood chromium levels (both plasma and RBC) for any individual may vary widely throughout the day due to fluctuations in dietary chromium intake and non-occupational exposures to chromium, experimental results (Buynder, 2010) showed no statistically significant differences between the mean blood erythrocyte or plasma chromium levels between the normal population and case groups with chromium intake from the diet or other non-occupational exposures to chromium.
Ramzan et al. (2011) concluded that chromium exposure in tannery workers led to low values of total erythrocyte count (TEC), packed cell volume (PCV) and mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) in age groups between 20–60 years. They consider the hematological profile a potent indicator of chromium toxicity.
Huang et al. (1999) found the concentrations of both chromium and malondialdehyde (MDA), the product of lipid peroxidation in blood and urine, to be significantly higher in chromium-exposed workers from a chromeplating factory. Their data suggest that MDA may be used as a biomarker for occupational chromium exposure but antioxidant enzymatic activities are not a suitable marker for chromium exposure.
Poznyak et al. (2002) found that exposure to Cr (VI) induced lipid oxidation, which again can be detected by ozonation and quantitatively calculated by the DB-index and DBcell-index determination in plasma, erythrocytes, and sperm, and hence the ozonation method can be considered an acceptable modern technique (fast, inexpensive and simple) for chromium toxic effect monitoring in vitro.
A new type of biological monitoring method to find whether threshold concentrations have been respected over a given period was introduced by Lewalter, et al. (1985). On the other hand, the formation of DNA-protein crosslinks (DPCs) in target tissues appears to be the direct and primary genotoxic effect of Cr(VI) exposure and the lymphocytic DPCs may be viewed as a biomarker of internal Cr (VI) accumulation (Xiao et al., 2013).
The possibility is however to be pointed out that small, exposure-related changes in hematological parameters may not have been detected in occupational exposure studies if values were within normal clinical ranges.
Hematological profiles
Cases of hematological changes have been reported in humans after ingestion of lethal or sublethal doses of Cr (VI) compounds. The blood report of an eighteen- year-old woman who ingested a few grams of potassium dichromate indicated decreased hemoglobin content and hematocrit, increased total white blood cell counts, reticulocyte counts, and plasma hemoglobin after four days of ingestion, clearly depicting intravascular hemolysis (Sharma et al., 1978). Laboratory analysis of the blood sample of a 35-year-old woman who died 12 hours after ingesting 50 ml of pure chromic acid [25 g Cr (VI)] revealed severe anemia with thrombocytopenia. (Loubières et al., 1999).
In a study of the National Toxicological Programme in 2008, male F344/N rats (6–7 weeks old) were exposed to sodium dichromate dihydrate in drinking water and hematological assessments were conducted after 22 days, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. The results indicated microcytic, hypochromic anemia in the test animals.
According to De Flora et al. (2000), the sequestering capacity of whole blood (187–234 mg per individual) and the reducing capacity of red blood cells (at least 93–128 mg) explain why this metal is not a systemic toxicant, except at very high doses.
Effects of Cr (VI) on plasma
Since RBC and plasma chromium are assumed to be in the hexavalent and trivalent form respectively, it appeared that there was some reduction of the hexavalent form in both fasted and nonfasted animals after a single oral dose (MacKenzie et al., 1959). Spontaneous plasma reduction capacity (SPRC) determines the ability of an individual to reduce Cr (Vl) to Cr (lll) and once converted to trivalent form, chromium can no longer enter the red blood cell. Subjects with “strong” SPRC will thus excrete a relatively higher concentration of chromium in urine, leaving lower concentrations of chromium within the red blood cells (Miksche and Lewalter, 1997; World Health Organization, 1996; Geller, 20011).
In the absence of known exposure, whole blood chromium concentrations are in the range of 2–3 μg/100 mL, with lower levels occurring in rural areas only. It is therefore possible to distinguish sources and types of exposure [Cr (VI) versus other forms of Cr] by measuring Cr contents of RBC and serum (ASTDR, 2008).
In general, the reference values for chromium in plasma for populations that are not occupationally exposed to chromium range from 0.04–0.35 μg/L (Christensen et al., 1993) with a mean of 0.25 μg/L. The average chromium concentration in plasma of residents was found to be 5.71 nmol/L or 0.27 μg/L (Torra et al., 1999).
Pharmacokinetic patterns showed that Cr (VI) had the highest bioavailability (6.9%) and the longest half-life (approximately 39 hr) compared to its other forms and although all of them could cause temporary elevations in red blood cell (RBC) and plasma chromium concentrations. The highest efficacy was shown by Cr(VI) . By comparing RBC and plasma chromium patterns in animals exposed to high doses of Cr (VI) (Kerger et al., 1996), it was found that nearly all the ingested Cr (VI) was reduced to Cr (III) before entering the bloodstream.
Effects of Cr (VI) on erythrocytes
When Cr VI was inhaled or administered intratracheally, intraperitoneally, or intravenously, much of the chromium in the blood (25 to 70%) was taken up by RBCs (Sayato et al., 1980; Weber, 1983; Wiegand et al., 1984; Edel & Sabbioni, 1985; Minoia & Cavalleri, 1988; Gao et al., 1993). As the erythrocyte to plasma ratio of total chromium increases with increasing hexavalent chromium concentration, Corbett et al. (1998) proposed that the reductive capacity of erythrocytes was much greater than that of plasma and that the reduction rate of hexavalent chromium in erythrocytes was greater than the rate of uptake from plasma.
As discussed earlier, Cr (VI) taken up by RBCs undergoes reduction to the trivalent form with the help of reduced glutathione (Wiegand et al., 1984) and complexes with Hgb and other intracellular proteins that are sufficiently stable to retain chromium for a substantial fraction of the RBC lifetime (Aaseth et al., 1982). This was confirmed by the result of an experiment where K2Cr2O7, a hexavalent chromium compound, introduced into plasma and reconstituted whole blood from three individuals was found to be readily reduced to Cr (III) in the concentration range of 100–1,000 μg Cr (VI)/L (Corbett et al., 1998). Excess trivalent chromium in the RBC is sequestered until cell death (Kerger et al., 1997; Aaseth et al., 1982). Over time, the RBC-associated chromium appears to be transferred to the spleen as a result of scavenging aging RBCs from the blood.
The total chromium content in the blood of workers of age group 1–20 years was significantly higher (24%) when compared with the same age group of non-workers. The mean cell volume, packed cell volume and platelet counts in workers were generally lower, whereas the hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration values were higher in workers than in non-workers. Total erythrocyte count (TEC) was found to be significantly lower in tannery workers of age group 20–50 years, regularly exposed to Cr (VII) than in their respective non-exposed control counterparts. Packed cell volume (PCV) was significantly higher in workers of age group 30–40 years, while mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) was significantly lower in the age group above 50 years. No significant differences were observed in the values of hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration between tannery workers and non-exposed control individuals (Ramzan et al., 2011), whereas the hemoglobin and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration values were higher in workers than in non-workers.
Beyersmann and Buttner (1989) detected modification of human erythrocyte membrane proteins by chromate and observed that chromate (10 mM) caused an increase in the intracellular resistance with an augmentation of the critical voltage, where the membrane resistance broke down owing to electroporation. Moreover, a slight chromate-induced augmentation of echinocyte shape was observed. Chromate also caused the intracellular pH to shift to higher values. Stana et al. (2009) observed increase of erythrocyte membrane fragility in direct relation with the administered dose of chromium. Significant differences between experimental and control groups were registered and the degree of hemolysis was related to the dose.
As the human plasma was found capable of spontaneous reduction of Cr (VI) ions of up to 2 ppm to Cr (III), it was assumed that only those Cr (VI) concentrations can penetrate the membrane of the RBC and enter the cell which either come into contact with the membrane during the reduction process or exceed the limit concentration of 2 ppm. This reduction capacity (PRC) can be increased considerably by adding ascorbic acid (AA) as decreased binding of Cr (VI) inside the erythrocytes has been reported under the effect of AA. Thus a sizable portion of the increase of chromium levels in plasma and RBC following oral administration of Cr (VI) to humans is probably due to the accumulation of Cr (III) formed by the extensive reduction of absorbed Cr (VI) in plasma and RBC after oral administration (OEHHA, 2011) Nejla Soudani et al. (2011) found excess chromium (Cr) exposure to be associated with various pathological conditions including hematological dysfunction. The generation of oxidative stress is one of the plausible mechanisms behind Cr-induced cellular deteriorations. The efficacy of selenium (Se) to combat Cr-induced oxidative damage in the erythrocytes of adult rats was investigated by studying the effects of Se by providing selenium enriched and selenium-free hexavalent chromium mixed diet with drinking water to female Wistar rats for 3 weeks, maintaining proper controls. The rats exposed to only hexavalent chromium showed an increase of malondialdehyde and protein carbonyl levels and a decrease in sulfhydryl content, glutathione, non-protein thiol, and vitamin C levels. A decrease of enzyme activities like catalase, glutathione peroxidase, and superoxide dismutase activities was also noted, whereas co-administration of selenium could restore the given parameters to near-normal values to prevent Cr (VI)-induced erythrocyte damage.
Exposure to high chromium values in the gestation period led to increased chromium level in mother blood, placenta and fetus, with significant decrease of hemoglobin (p<0.01) in experimental groups compared to controls (Stana et al., 2009)
Experiments of Alpoim et al. (1995) and Fernandes et al. (1999) pointed out the occurrence of chromate-induced hemoglobin oxidation and membrane peroxidation in human erythrocytes, which in turn promoted oxidation of GSH, inhibition of glutathione reductase and methemoglobin reductase, and the transformation of normal shape to echinocytic form of erythrocytes. However, chromate did not affect the activities of catalase, gluthatione peroxidase, superoxide dismutase and did not hamper the osmotic fragility of the cells (Fernandes et al., 1999). Based on these findings, it was suggested that chromate may be cytotoxic to human erythrocytes. It should be taken into account that in human erythrocytes the intracellular redox balance, reduced glutathione oxidized, hemoglobin/ methemoglobin ratio, and the cell shape, which are crucial for cell functions and survival, are irreversibly disrupted by Cr (VI) (Fernandes et al., 1999). The finding showing that pretreatments of human erythrocytes with vitamin E, vitamin C, salicylate and deferoxamine (DFO) potentiated chromate-induced cytotoxicity, indicating that pre-treatment of cells with DFO prevented chromate-induced peroxidation, revealed that these drugs potentiated the electron transfer between the hemoglobin-Fe2− and chromium (V) intermediates, decreasing chromium (V) intermediates-mediated generation of ROS via the Haber-Weiss cycle or through a Fenton-like reaction (Fernandes et al., 2000).
Results of acute, intermediate, and chronic treatment studies in animals identified that the hematological system is one of the most sensitive targets of oral exposure to chromium (VI) and the effects include microcytic, hypochromic anemia, characterized by decreased mean cell volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), hematocrit (Hct), and hemoglobin (Hgb), as observed in rats and mice orally exposed to chromium (VI) compounds for 4 days to 1 year. The severity of anemia exhibited dose- and duration-dependence, with maximum effects observed after approximately 3 weeks of exposure; but with increasing exposure durations, anemia became less severe, presumably due to compensatory hematopoietic responses.
In Swiss mice, intraperitoneally injected hexavalent chromium, blood hemoglobin level, hematocrit value and erythrocyte count were reduced by 17.5, 17.4 and 15.9%, respectively, as compared to controls, accompanied by echinocytic transformation (Figure 2) of 33.8% erythrocytes, indicating hemolytic anemia. But cytochemical studies indicated that Cr (VI) treatment did not cause denaturation of already synthesized hemoglobin (Ray & Sarkar, 2012).
Figure 2.
Echinocytic transformation of hexavalent chromium exposed normal mammalian erythrocytes.
Results of hematological analyses showed that mice exposed to sodium dichromate dihydrate in drinking water for 3 months developed mild erythrocyte microcytosis (Stern & Dabt, 2009. The effects were however more severe in rats exposed under similar conditions.
Although after treatment of ≥5.2 mg hexavalent chromium/kg-day, MCV and MCH were significantly reduced in males (maximum 8%) and females (maximum 10%), erythrocyte counts were slightly increased in females, but not in males (Bucher, 2007).
Acute exposure of male rats to 2.7 mg chromium (VI)/kg/day in drinking water for 4 days, produced a statistically significant decrease (2.1%) in MCH. Further increase in the dose (≥7.4 mg chromium (VI)/kg/day) resulted in additional decrease in MCH and decrease in MCV. Although the magnitude of changes of hematological parameters after acute exposure was minimal, still these are considered to be indicative of adverse health effects.
More severe microcytic, hypochromic anemia occurred in rats and mice following exposure to sodium dichromate dihydrate in drinking water for 22 or 23 days, which was found to ameliorate with time (NTP, 2008). Decreased Hct, Hgb, MCV, and MCH occurred at ≥0.77 mg chromium (VI)/kg/day, with decreases exhibiting dose-dependence; effects were not observed at 0.21 mg chromium (VI)/kg/day, but after exposure for 3–12 months, severity of the microcytic, hypochromic anemia in treated rats and mice was reduced. Hematological effects, including decreased hematocrit, hemoglobin, and erythrocyte count, have also been reported in rats exposed to chromium trivalent oxide for 90 days. A dose-dependent reduction of the peripheral blood erythrocyte count and a decrease in hemoglobin level were observed in experimental animals after intraperitoneal injections of Cr (VI) in the concentrations of 0.025 μg/kg to rats (Zhumabaeva et al., 2014).
Stana et al. (2009) evaluated hexavalent chromium toxicity in Wistar female rats, which received “in utero”during the gestation period different doses of Cr (VI), namely 25, 50 and 75 ppm. They found precipitation of hemoglobin, appearance of Heinz body, reduction of plasticity followed by irreversible self-oxidation of saturated lipids, and finally degeneration and lysis of erythrocytic membrane.
Richelmi et al. (1984) immediately analyzed the hematological parameters of blood collected at different times, after intravenous administration of 0.5 and 2.5 mg/kg b.w. of K2Cr2O7 in male Wistar rats. Cr (VI) was not detected in whole blood one minute after administration of the lower dose. In blood of rats receiving the higher dose, an incomplete reduction of Cr (VI) was observed, revealing a highly rapid but limited metabolic capacity of hematic compartment to reduce Cr (VI) to Cr (III).
Subcutaneous introduction of a lower dose (10 mg/l) of Cr (VI) induced a marked decrease in the number of erythrocytes (−6%), hematocrit values (−15%) and hemoglobin concentration in male Wistar albino rats, although a comparatively higher dose (30 mg/l ) in drinking water had no effect on the erythropoietic parameters studied. Short-term subcutaneous introduction of lower dose exposures to female Wistar albino rats resulted in eythrocytopenia and a decrease in hematocrit values and hemoglobin concentration (Adjroud et al., 2009).
“In vitro” incubation of K2Cr2O7 (4 μM) with rat erythrocytes or plasma at 37°C showed a rapid reduction of Cr(VI) in red cell while plasma samples demonstrating a limited reductive power along with a decrease in hematocrit, particularly due to the change in blood fluid volume (Stern et al, 2009).
Effects of Cr (VI) on leukocytes
The white blood cell counts decreased in workers up to the age of 40 years, whereas in the older population it showed a slight increase (Ashan et al., 2006). The transport characteristics of labelled chromium (51-chromate) in normal human leukocytes indicates that chromate uptake is highly specific, unidirectional and follows the Michaelis-Menten kinetics (the maximum velocity is 52 m/moles/g dry weight of cells per min). Further it is temperature sensitive and energy dependent. A variety of metabolic poisons, including metavanadate, competitively inhibits chromate influx. On the basis of their experimental results, Lilien et al. (1970) proposed that Cr (VI) may be the form in which chromium penetrates the cell membrane, operating on a highly specific transport mechanism.
After intraperitoneal injection with an aqueous solution of potassium dichromate at a dose (one tenth of LD50 value) for 5 consecutive days per week, for a total period of 2 weeks in male albino Swiss mice, it was found that although there was no change in the TC and DC of leukocytes at the initial stage, at the end of the second week of treatment, TC of leukocytes was noted to be markedly reduced in the experimental mice, as compared to that in the controls. Interestingly, the count of lymphocytes was considerably higher in the experimental mice than in their control counterparts, while the count of neutrophils was significantly lower. These findings along with a higher incidence of chromosomal abnormalities and micronucleated cells in the bone marrow made the authors (Ray & Sarkar, 2011) conclude that hexavalent chromium is relatively more myelosuppressive than lymphopenic in action. Microscopically lymphoid hyperplasia was characterized by minimal-to-mild lymphocyte proliferation. In adult Swiss mice, treated intraperitoneally with hexavalent chromium, Ray and Sarkar (2012) found leukopenia only after 2 weeks (mean leukocyte count: 4.91 thousand c mm−1). Subcutaneous administration of hexavalent chromium (50 mg/Kg body weight) in male Wistar albino rats, led to leukopenia (−55%), lymphopenia (−57%), monocytosis (+104%), and granulocytosis (+204%). Subcutaneous exposure to a low dose of K2Cr2O7 in female Wistar albino rats caused almost similar changes in the leukocytic profile. Oral administration of Cr (VI) through drinking water seriously affected male rats by inducing leukopenia, lymphopenia, monocytosis, and granulocytosis (Adjroud, 2009).
Lei and Zhuang (1995) found the formation of DNA-protein cross links (DPC) in many tissues in male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats, following repeated intraperitoneal injection of Cr (VI) (10 mg/kg) for 3 weeks, with WBC found a highly sensitive target of chromate(VI).
The study of Patlolla et al. (2009) demonstrated that intraperitoneal administration of Cr (VI) to rats during 5 days could induce DNA damage in peripheral blood lymphocytes and oxidative stress in liver and kidney.
Krupa et al. (2002) exhibited the role of Cr (VI) on RNA and DNA-chromium adduct formation in isolated nucleic acids and isolated pig lymphocytes. The incubation of total cellular RNA and nuclear DNA isolated from lymphocytes with Cr (III) and Cr (VI) yielded a binding of Cr atoms to RNA 1.1D1.6 higher than to DNA and the number of chromium atoms bound to nucleic acids was higher after incubation with Cr (VI) than with Cr (III) in both experimental systems.
Halasova et al. (2012) proposed that although no apparent increase in chromosomal damage was recorded in chromium-exposed welders in comparison with controls, the genetic make-up in DNA repair genes may increase the susceptibility toward adverse effects of chromium. Hexavalent chromium was found to induce DNA-protein crosslinks (DPCs) and mitochondrial damage to lymphocytes and the lymphocytic DPCs may be viewed as a biomarker of internal Cr (VI) accumulation (Xiao et al., 2013).
Pilot studies of DNA-protein cross-links in peripheral blood lymphocytes have been conducted by Costa et al. (1996) in individuals with higher exposure to chromate (welders) and individuals with lower levels of exposure (residents living in a chromium-contaminated area) in New Jersey and in two Bulgarian cities (Jambol and Burgas) with different levels of air pollution and Cr(VI) exposure. DNA protein cross-links in welders and in individuals living in New Jersey around chromium-contaminated areas were significantly higher compared to matched controls.
A small group of 5 manual metal arc stainless steel welders exposed to hexavalent chromium were examined for two end-points: a chemical one with the formation of DNA-protein crosslink (DPC) and a biological one marked by the occurrence of micronuclei in peripheral lymphocytes by Medeiros et al. (2003). Zhang et al. (2011) found that low-level occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium induced DNA damage in peripheral lymphocytes in electroplating workers. Werfel et al. (1998) measured DNA damage and sister chromatid exchange (SCE) frequencies in lymphocytes taken from the venous blood of an equal number of welders and non-welders, with the welders showing a significantly higher rate of DNA single-strand breakages and significantly elevated SCE values. Moreover, DNA single-strand breakage and DNA-protein cross-links differentially increased depending on the exposure levels to chromium (VI).
Effect of Cr (VI) on lymphocytes
In experimental animals, Zhumabaeva et al. (2014) found on the 30th day of treatment peripheral blood lymphocytes and leukocytosis developed at the expense of higher counts of B (CD20) and T lymphocytes (CD3) and their subpopulations. Intraperitoneal injections of Cr (VI) brought about a significant change in the morphology of the thymus gland and increased the counts of macrophages. In vitro experiments on murine lymphocytes also led to inhibition of the proliferation of both T and B cells. This immunosuppression was associated with the development of implant-associated infection in patients with a prosthesis (Wang et al., 1997). Phagocytic activity of alveolar macrophages and the humoral immune response were depressed in the presence of higher doses of Cr (VI) (Glaser et al., 1985). Terpilowska and Siwicki (2010) showed that chromium injection (dose of 1 and 10 mg Cr per body weight) significantly decreased IL-1α concentration but not the concentration of IL-6 and induced no differences in the proliferative response of lymphocytes and in the metabolic activity of phagocyting cells.
Studies of Quievryn et al. (2001) showed that reduction of Cr (VI) by cysteine resulted in the formation of mutagenic Cr (III)-DNA adducts in the absence of oxidative DNA damage. They found that the peripheral lymphocytes from unexposed humans had a 7.8-fold excess of glutathione over cysteine, whereas lymphocytes from stainless steel welders contained only a 3 times higher amount of glutathione, which was entirely caused by the decrease in the concentration of glutathione. The higher reduction rate combined with a decrease in the intracellular concentration of glutathione made cysteine a predominant Cr (VI)-reducing thiol in lymphocytes of welders.
Effect of Cr (VI) on platelets
Royer et al. (2010) found that after taking oral chromium picolinate tablets for 4–5 months for losing weight, the patient developed acute thrombocytopenia. Platelet count and other abnormalities returned to normal by day 26 after stopping chromium tablets. Subcutaneous exposure (50 mg/kg body weight) of Cr (VI) in male Wistar albino rats, which after 3 days led to thrombocytosis (+38%), resulted in the long run in a marked decrease in the number of platelets (−48%). Short-term subcutaneous exposure to low doses of K2Cr2O7 induced thrombocytopenia in female Wistar albino rats. Oral treatment of 30mg/l Cr (VI) with drinking water to male Wistar albino rats reduced the platelet count during the first three days, while on the 6th day of chromium treatment the situation was reversed with an elevation (+21%) in platelet counts.
Effect of Cr (VI) on induction of apoptosis and cancer
Vasant et al. (2001) reported that apoptosis was the mode of cell death of human lymphocytes in the presence of both Cr (V) and Cr (VI). In Fanconi anemia (FA), an autosomal recessive disorder in humans, the chromium DNA crosslinking might act as proapoptotic lesion. Bagchi et al. (2001) demonstrated concentration- and time-dependent effects of Cr (VI) on DNA fragmentation and apoptotic cell death in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
NIOSH considers all Cr (VI) compounds to be occupational carcinogens and recommends that airborne exposure to all Cr(VI) compounds be limited to a concentration of 0.2 μg Cr(VI)/m3 for an 8-hr time-weighted average exposure, during a 40-hr workweek (occupational exposure). Cr(VI) is implicated as respiratory carcinogen inducing several types of DNA lesions, including ternary DNA-Cr-DNA interstrand cross-links (Cr-DDC) (Vilcheck et al., 2002). Hexavalent chromium is a known human carcinogen via inhalation (IARC, 2012; OSHA, 2006; U.S. EPA, 1998a), though less is understood about the risks of hexavalent chromium when ingested (Stern, 2010). Observational epidemiology studies of a population in China reported conflicting results on whether an association exists between consumption of drinking water contaminated with hexavalent chromium and stomach cancer (Kerger et al., 2009; Beaumont et al., 2008; Zhang & Li, 1997). On the other hand, absorption of Cr (VI) into the intestinal epithelium, oxidative stress and inflammation, cell proliferation, direct and/or indirect DNA modification, and mutagenesis (Thompson et al., 2011) are key events of tumorogenesis.
Biochemical profiles
The total chromium (56.9%) and hexavalent chromium (78%) were significantly higher in the blood of an exposed male and female worker population as compared with the control population. No definite pattern was observed in different hematological and biochemical parameters when comparing workers with non-workers, normal males with exposed males and normal females with exposed females. A slight variation may be due to a multitude of factors in addition to possible effects of chromium toxicity (Ahsan et al., 2006).
Albumin, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferases, aspartate aminotransferases and total protein showed higher values, whereas the total bilirubin, direct bilirubin and blood serum glucose contents showed lower values in blood sera of factory workers, both male and female, when compared with those of the control population.
EL-Shafei (2012) found that there was a significant elevation in the level of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatinephosphokinase (CPK) in blood samples of workers of chromium-electroplating factories.
Cr (VI) was found to decrease superoxide dismutase (SOD) and reduced glutathione (GSH), to increase glutahione peroxidase (GPx) in human erythrocytes and to reduce the ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) (Dlugosz et al., 2012).
Remedial measures of adverse hematological effects of Cr (VI)
Industrialization, urbanization and various anthropogenic activities such as mining and agriculture have increased releases of toxic heavy metals into the natural environment, altering both natural and man–made ecosystems (Mudhoo et al., 2012). Excess chromium (VI) exposure is associated with various pathological conditions including hematological abnormalities. The generation of oxidative stress is one of the plausible mechanisms behind Cr-induced cellular deteriorations. The efficacy of selenium (Se) to combat Cr-induced oxidative damage in erythrocytes of adult rats was investigated by Soudani et al. (2011). Interestingly, chromium hexavalent is extremely reactive with vitamin C. As Cr (VI) exposure was coupled with vitamin C in the body, Anatoly Zhitkovich and his team in 2007 found that vitamin C inside cells provoked more mutations and DNA breaks, turning chromium more toxic (Reynolds et al., 2007). On the other hand, Xiao et al., 2013, using peripheral blood lymphocytes from Sprague-Dawley rats, demonstrated that pre- and co-treatment with vitamin C had a protective effect against Cr (VI)-induced loss of cell viability and mitochondrial damage, whereas only vitamin C co-treatment had a protective effect against the Cr(VI)-induced increase in DNA-protein cross links (DPCs) correlated with expression of p53. However, vitamin C may only be effective in increasing elimination of Cr (VI) at high concentrations when plasma reduction is saturated and may be of limited therapeutic use in patients with orthopedic implants (Afolaranmi and Grant, 2013). The work of Rudrama Devi and Naik (2011) showed that the genotoxic effect associated with occupational exposure to high chromium levels could be significantly reduced by three months by ascorbic acid supplementation and the industry management was advised to use vitamin C in workers continuously inhaling fumes of Cr (VI). Tarasub et al. (2008) reported that the antioxidant quercetin, a potent oxygen free radical scavenger and a metal chelator found in fruits and vegetables, might have a protective effect against hexavalent chromium induced chromosome aberrations in rat bone marrow (Tarasub et al., 2008).
Corbett et al. (1998) reported data indicating that the plasma reduction capacity is enhanced by a recent meal, yet it may be overwhelmed at Cr (VI) concentrations between 2 000 and 10 000 micrograms/L.
Luczak and Zhitkovich (2013) found a broad spectrum of chemoprotective roles of the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in human cells, including suppression of cytotoxicity, apoptosis, p53 activation, and HSP72 and HIF-1α upregulation. Cytoprotection by NAC was independent of cellular glutathione. NAC strongly inhibited the uptake of Cr (VI) causing a loss of Cr (VI) accumulation by cells.
Conclusions
On balance then, the major conclusion is that Cr (VI) induced toxicity or carcinogenicity is the consequence of altered cytogenomics associated with oxidative stress, DNA damage, apoptosis, cell-cycle regulation, cytoskeleton, morphological changes, energy metabolism, biosynthesis, oncogenes, bioenergetics, and an immune system critical for toxicity (Nigam et al., 2014). The intensity of dysregulation of genes or pathways involved in mechanistic events forms a sub-threshold or threshold level depending upon the dose of the toxicant, duration of exposure, type of target cells, and niche microenvironment of cells resulting in several abnormal features. Blood cells in the body, an easy target to be affected by Cr (VI), produce alterations in normal hematological parameters leading to a number of ailments.
REFERENCES
- Aaseth J, Alexander J, Norseth T. Uptake of 51Cr-chromate by human erythrocytes–a role of glutathione. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol. 1982;50:310–315. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1982.tb00979.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Achal V, Kumari D, Pan X. Bioremediation of chromium contaminated soil by a brown rot fungus Gloeophyllum sepiarium. Res. J. Microbiol. 2011;6:166–171. [Google Scholar]
- Ackerley DF, Barak Y, Lynch SV, Curtin J, Matin A. Effect of chromate stress on Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol. 2006;188(9):3371–3381. doi: 10.1128/JB.188.9.3371-3381.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Adjroud O. Effects of potassium dichromate on haematological parameters in female and male Wistar albino rats. Ass Univ Bull Environ Res. 2009;12:87–99. [Google Scholar]
- Afolaranmi GA, Grant MH. The effect of ascorbic acid on the distribution of soluble Cr and Co ions in the blood and organs of rats. J Appl Toxicol. 2013;33(3):220–6. doi: 10.1002/jat.1744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ahsan MM, Shakoori FR, Shakoori AR. Biochemical and Haematological Abnormalities in Factory Workers Exposed to Hexavalent Chromium in Tanneries of Kasur District. Pakistan J Zool. 2006;38(3):239–253. [Google Scholar]
- Alpoim MC, Geraldes CF, Oliveira CR, Lima MC. Molecular mechanisms of chromium toxicity: oxidation of hemoglobin. Biochem Soc Trans. 1995;23:241–242. doi: 10.1042/bst023241s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ashan MM, Shakoori FR, Shakoori AR. Biochemical and Haematological Abnormalities in Factory Workers Exposed to Hexavalent Chromium in Tanneries of Kasur District. Pak J Zool. 2006;38(3):239–253. [Google Scholar]
- ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry) Toxicological Profile. US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry; 2008a. Chromium (TP-7) p. 610. [Google Scholar]
- ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry) Toxicological Profile for Chromium. 2008b. Available at: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tox-profiles/tp7.html#bookmark09. [PubMed]
- ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry) Toxicological Profile. US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry; 2000. Chromium (TP-7) p. 461. [Google Scholar]
- Bagchi D, Bagchi M, Stohs SJ. Chromium (VI)-induced oxidative stress, apoptotic cell death and modulation of p53 tumor suppressor gene. Mol Cell Biochem. 2001;222:149–158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beaumont JJ, Sedman RM, Reynolds SD, et al. Cancer mortality in a Chinese population exposed to hexavalent chromium in drinking water. Epidemiol. 2008;19:12–23. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31815cea4c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beyersmann D, Buttner B. Chromate effects on red cells membranes. Biol Trace Elem Res. 1989;21:263–270. doi: 10.1007/BF02917262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bucher JR. NTP toxicity studies of sodium dichromate dihydrate (CAS No. 7789-12-0) administered in drinking water to male and female F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice and male BALB/c and am3-C57BL/6 mice. Toxic Rep Ser. 2007;72:1–G4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buynder PV. Evaluation of chromium in blood. 2010. A report prepared by ChemRisk Canada, a division of ChemRisk LLP, Guelph, Ontario N1H7L6. [Google Scholar]
- Cervantes C, Campos-Garciıa J, Devars S, Gutierrez-Corona F, Loza-Tavera H, Torres Guzman JC, Moreno-Sanchez R. Interactions of chromium with microorganisms and plants. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2001;25:335–347. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2001.tb00581.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Christensen JM, Holst E, Bonde JP, Knudsen L. Determination of chromium in blood and serum. Evaluation of quality control procedures and estimation of reference values in Danish subjects. Sci Total Environ. 1993;132:11–25. doi: 10.1016/0048-9697(93)90258-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Corbett GE, Dodge DG, O’Flaherty E, Liang J, Throop L, Finley BL, Kerger BD. In vitro reduction kinetics of hexavalent chromium in human blood. Environ Res. 1998;78(1):7–11. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1998.3840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Costa M, Zhitkovich A, Toniolo P, Taioli E, Popov T, Lukanova A. Monitoring Human Lymphocytic DNA-Protein Cross-links as Biomarkers of Biologically Active Doses of Chromate. Env Health Perspective. 1996;104:917–919. doi: 10.1289/ehp.96104s5917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dana Devi K, Rozati R, Saleha Banu B, Jamil K, Grover P. In vivo genotoxic effect of potassium dichromate in mice leukocytes using comet assay. Food Chem Toxicol. 2001;39:859–865. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(01)00019-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Das AP, Singh S. Occupational health assessment of chromite toxicity among Indian miners. Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2011;15(1):6–13. doi: 10.4103/0019-5278.82998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dayan AD, Payne AJ. Mechanisms of chromium toxicity, carcinogenicity and allergenicity: review of the literature from 1985 to 2000. Human Experi Toxicol. 2001;20:439–451. doi: 10.1191/096032701682693062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Flora S, Mulbah S, Cartiglia C, D’Agostini F, Longobardi M, Steele VE, Izzotti A. Smoke-induced micro RNA and related proteome alte rations. Modulation by chemopreventive agents. Int J Cancer. 2012;131(12):2763–73. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Flora S. Threshold mechanisms and site specificity in chromium (VI) carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis. 2000;21(4):533–541. doi: 10.1093/carcin/21.4.533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Długosz A, Rembacz K P, Pruss A, Durlak M, Lembas-Bogaczyk J. Influence of Chromium on the Natural Antioxidant Barrier. Pol J Env Studies. 2012;21(2):331–335. [Google Scholar]
- ECB (European Chemicals Bureau) European Union Risk Assessment Report. Chromium trioxide, sodium chromate, sodium dichromate, ammonium dichromate and potassium dichromate Risk Assessment. 2005. EUR Report No. 201508. [Google Scholar]
- Edel J, Sabbioni E. Pathways of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) in the rat after intratracheal administration. Hum Toxicol. 1985;4:409–416. doi: 10.1177/096032718500400407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- EL-Shafei HM. Monitoring of Urine and Serum Cellular Enzymes in the Chromium Electroplating Workers. J Bioengineer Biomedical Sci. 2012;2:3. [Google Scholar]
- EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) Toxicological Review of Trivalent Chromium. 1998 CAS No. 16065-83-1. In support of Summary Information on the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) Accession No: PB99-137341. [Google Scholar]
- Fernandes MAS, Geraldes CFGC, Oliveira CR, Alpoim MC. Chromate-induced human erythrocytes haemoglobin oxidation and peroxidation: influence of vitamin E, vitamin C, salicylate, deferoxamine, and N-ethylmaleimide. Toxicol Lett. 2000;114:237–243. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4274(00)00167-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fernandes MAS, Mota IM, Silva MTL, Oliveira CR, Geraldes CFGC, Alpoim MC. Human erythrocytes are protected against chromate induced peroxidation. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety. 1999;43:38–46. doi: 10.1006/eesa.1998.1755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gao M, Levy LS, Braithwaite RA, Brown SS. Monitoring of total chromium in rat fluids and lymphocytes following intratracheal administration of soluble trivalent or hexavalent chromium compounds. Human Exp Toxicol. 1993;12:377–382. doi: 10.1177/096032719301200506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Geller RJ. Chromium. In: Sullivan JB, Krieger GR, editors. Clinical environmental health and toxic exposures. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lipincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. pp. 926–930. [Google Scholar]
- Glaser U, Hochrainer D, Kloppel H, Kuhnen H. Low level chromium (VI) inhalation effects on alveolar macrophages and immune functions in Wistar rats. Arch Toxicol. 1985;57:250–256. doi: 10.1007/BF00324787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Halasova E, Matakova T, Musak L, Polakova V, Letkova L, Dobrota D, Vodicka P. Evaluating chromosomal damage in workers exposed to hexavalent chromium and the modulating role of polymorphisms of DNA repair genes. Int Arch Occup Env Health. 2012;85(5):473–481. doi: 10.1007/s00420-011-0684-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- http://flipper.diff.org/app/items/info/5530.
- http://www.inchem.org/documents/cicads/cicads/cicad76.pdf.
- Huang YL, Chen CY, Sheu JY, Chuang IC, Pan JH, Lin TH. Lipid Peroxidation In Workers Exposed To Hexavalent Chromium. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A. 1999;56(4):235–247. doi: 10.1080/009841099158088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) Chromium (VI) compounds) 2012;100:147–167. [Google Scholar]
- IPCS (International Programme on Chemical Safety) Inorganic chromium (III) compounds. Draft. Concise International Chemical Assessment Document. Geneva: World health Organization; 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Jabari M, Aqra F, Sahin S, Khatib A. Monitoring chromium content in tannery wastewater. J Argent Chem Soc. 2009;97(2):77–87. http://www.aqa.org.ar/pdf9702/9702art7.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Kerger BD, Butler WJ, Paustenbach DJ, Zhang JD, Li SK. Cancer Mortality in Chinese Populations Surrounding an Alloy Plant with Chromium Smelting Operations. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A. 2009;72(5):329. doi: 10.1080/15287390802529898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kerger BD, Paustenbach DJ, Corbett GE, Finley BL. Absorption and elimination of trivalent and hexavalent chromium in humans following ingestion of a bolus dose in drinking water. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1996;141:145–158. doi: 10.1006/taap.1996.0271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krupa R, Stanczak M, Walter Z. Chromium Incorporated in RNA and DNA. Verlag der Z Naturforsch C. 2002;57(9–10):951–3. doi: 10.1515/znc-2002-9-1033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Langird S, Nordhagen A. Small animal inhalation chambers and the significance of dust ingestion from the contaminated coat when exposing rats to zinc chromate. Acta pharmacol et toxicol. 1980;46:43–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1980.tb02417.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lei Y, Zhang Q, Zhuang Z. Study on DNA-protein crosslinks induced by chromate and nickel compounds in vivo with 125I-postlabelling assay. Mutation Res. 1995;329:197–203. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(95)00047-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lewalter J, Korallus U, Harzdorf C, Weidemann H. Chromium blood detection in isolated erythrocytes: A new principle of biological monitoring of exposure to hexavalent chromium. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1985;55:305–318. doi: 10.1007/BF00377689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lilien DL, Spivak JL, Goldman ID. Chromate Transport in Human Leukocytes. J Clin Invest. 1970;49(8):1551–7. doi: 10.1172/JCI106372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Loubières Y, de Lassence A, Bernier M, Vieillard-Baron A, Schmitt JM, Page B, Jardin F. Acute, fatal, oral chromic acid poisoning. J Toxicol - Clinl Toxicol. 1999;37(3):333–6. doi: 10.1081/clt-100102431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luczak MW, Zhitkovich A. Role of direct reactivity with metals in chemoprotection by N-acetylcysteine against chromium(VI), cadmium(II), and cobalt(II) Free Radical Biol Med. 2013;65:262–269. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.06.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MacKenzie RD, Anwar RA, Byerrum RU, Hoppert CA. Absorption and distribution of 5lCr in the albino rat. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1959;79:200–205. [Google Scholar]
- Medeiros MG, Rodrigues AS, Batoréu MC, Laires A, Rueff J, Zhitkovic A. Elevated levels of DNA-protein crosslinks and micronuclei in peripheral lymphocytes of tannery workers exposed to trivalent chromium. Mutagenesis. 2003;18(1):19–24. doi: 10.1093/mutage/18.1.19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Merritt K, Brown SA. Release of hexavalent chromium from corrosion of stainless steel and cobalt—chromium alloys. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995;29(5):627–633. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820290510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miksche LW, Lewalter J. Health surveillance and biological effect monitoring for chromium-exposed workers. Reg Toxicol Pharm. 1997;26:S94–S99. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1997.1146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Minoia C, Cavalleri A. Chromium in urine, serum and red blood cells in the biological monitoring of workers exposed to different chromium valency states. Sci. Total Environ. 1988;71:323–327. doi: 10.1016/0048-9697(88)90204-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mudhoo A, Garg VK, Wang S. Heavy Metals: Toxicity and Removal by Biosorption. Env Chem Sustain World. 2012;2012:379–442. [Google Scholar]
- Mythili K, Karthikeyan B. Bioremediation of Cr (VI) from Tannery effluent using Bacillus spp and Staphylococcus spp. Int Multidisciplin Res J. 2011;1(6):38–41. [Google Scholar]
- Nath K, Singh D, Shyam S, Sharma YK. Phytotoxic effects of chromium and tannery effluent on growth and metabolism of Phaseolus mungo Roxb. J Environ Biol. 2009;30:227–234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nigam A, Priya S, Bajpai P, Kumar S. Cytogenomics of hexavalent chromium (Cr 6+) exposed cells: A comprehensive review. Ind J Med Res. 2014;139:349–370. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- NIOSH (Comments of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health on the Occupational Safety and Health Administration) Request for Information Occupational Exposure to Hexavalent Chromium (Cr VI) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 2002. 29 CFR Part 1910, Docket No. H-0054a. [Google Scholar]
- NTP (National Toxicology Program) Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Sodium Dichromate Dihydrate (CAS No. 7789–12–0) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Drinking Water Studies) Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser. 2008;546:1–192. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- OEHHA (Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment) Public Health Goal for Hexavalent Chromium (Cr VI) in Drinking Water. Pesticide and Environmental Toxicology Branch, California Environmental Protection Agency; 2011. [Google Scholar]
- OSHA (Occupational Safety & Health Administration) Occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium. Final rule. Fed Reg. 2006;71:10099–10385. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patlolla AK, Barnes C, Yedjou C, Velma R, Tchounwou PB. Oxidative Stress, DNA Damage, and Antioxidant Enzyme Activity Induced by Hexavalent Chromium in Sprague-Dawley Rats. Environ Toxicol. 2009;24(1):66–73. doi: 10.1002/tox.20395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paustenbach DJ, Finley BL, Mowat FS, Kerger BD. Human health risk and exposure assessment of chromium (VI) in tap water. J Toxicol Environ Health. 2003;66(14):1295–339. doi: 10.1080/15287390306388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Petrilli FL, Rossi GA, Camoirano A, Romano M, Serra D, Bennicelli C, De Flora A, De Flora S. Metabolic reduction of chromium by alveolar macrophages and its relationships to cigarette smoke. J Clin Invest. 1986;77:1917–1924. doi: 10.1172/JCI112520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI11252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Poznyak T, Puga JM, Kiseleva E, Martinez Chromium Toxic Effect Monitoring Using Ozonation Method. Int J Toxicol. 2002;21(3):211–217. doi: 10.1080/10915810290096342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Quievryn G, Goulart M, Messer J, Zhitkovich A. Reduction of Cr(VI) by cysteine: Significance in human lymphocytes and formation of DNA damage in reactions with variable reduction rates. Mol Cell Biochem. 2001;222:107–118. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ramzan M, Malik MA, Iqbal Z, Arshad N, Khan SY, Arshad M. Study of hematological indices in tannery workers exposed to chromium in Sheikhupura (Pakistan) Toxicol Ind Health. 2011;27(9):857–64. doi: 10.1177/0748233711399316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ray RR, Sarkar NK. A Report on Myelosuppressive and Lymphopenic Effects of Hexavalent Chromium in a Murine Model. J Exp Sci. 2011;2(8):33–36. [Google Scholar]
- Ray RR, Sarkar NK. Light and Scanning Electron Microscopic Studies on Chromium-Induced Anemia in a Murine Model. Bulletin Environl Contamin Toxicol. 2012;88:10–14. doi: 10.1007/s00128-011-0469-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reynolds M, Stoddard L, Bespalov I, Zhitkovich A. Ascorbate acts as a highly potent inducer of chromate mutagenesis and clastogenesis: linkage to DNA breaks in G2 phase by mismatch repair. Nucleic acids Res. 2007;35(2):465–76. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl1069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richelmi P, Baldi C, Minoia C. Blood Levels of Hexavalent Chromium in Rats. In vitro and In vivo Experiments. Int J Environ Anal Chem. 1984;17:181–186. doi: 10.1080/03067318408076971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Royer DJ, George JN, Terrell DR. Thrombocytopenia as an adverse effect of complementary and alternative medicines, herbal remedies, nutritional supplements, foods, and beverages. Eur J Haematol. 2010;84:421–429. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2010.01415.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rudrama Devi K, Kumar J, Naik S. Effect of Ascorbic Acid Prophylaxis on the Frequency of Chromosomal Aberrations in the Peripheral Lymphocytes of Tannery Industrial Workers. IJPI’S J Biotechnol Biotherapeutic. 2011;2(7):1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Samitz MH. Ascorbic acid in the prevention and treatment of toxic effects from chromates. Acta Dermato-Venereolog. 1970;50(1):59–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sayato Y, Nakamuro K, Matsui S, Ando M. Metabolic fate of chromium compounds. I. Comparative behavior of chromium in rat administered with Na2-51Cr04 and 51CrCl3. J Pharm Dyn. 1980;3:17–23. doi: 10.1248/bpb1978.3.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schaffer AW, Pilger A, Engelhardt C, Zweymueller K, Ruediger HW. Increased blood cobalt and chromium after total hip replacement. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1999;37(7):839–44. doi: 10.1081/clt-100102463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sellappa S, Kripa SK, Shibily P, Joseph S, Balachandar V. Biomonitoring of Genotoxic Effects Among Shielded Manual Metal Arc Welders. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prevention. 2011;12:1041–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sharma BK, Singhal PC, Chugh KS. Intravascular haemolysis and acute renal failure following potassium dichromate poisoning. Postgrad Med J. 1978;54(632):414–415. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.54.632.414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singh N, Verma T, Gaur R. Detoxification of hexavalent chromium by an indigenous facultative anaerobic Bacillus cereus strain isolated from tannery effluent. Afric J Biotechnol. 2013;12(10):1091–1103. [Google Scholar]
- Soudani N, Ben Amara I, Troudi A, Hakim A, Bouaziz H, Ayadi Makni F, Zeghal KM, Zeghal N. Oxidative damage induced by chromium (VI) in rat erythrocytes: protective effect of selenium. J Physiol Biochem. 2011;67(4):577–588. doi: 10.1007/s13105-011-0104-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stana L, Trif A, Stana LG, Petrovici S, Gravila C. Cumulative potassium dichromate intake effect during pregnancy on the erythrocyte membrane fragility in female offspring at sexual maturity. Lucrări Stiinłifice medicină veterinară. 2009;XLII(2):291–294. [Google Scholar]
- Standeven AM, Wetterhahn KE. Chromium (VI) Toxicity: Uptake, Reduction, and DNA Damage. Int J Toxicol. 1989;8:1275–1283. [Google Scholar]
- Stern A, Dabt PH. Derivation of Ingestion-Based Soil Remediation Criteria for Cr+6 Based on the NTP Chronic Bioassay Data for Sodium Dichromate Dihydrate. Risk Assessment Subgroup of the NJDEP Chromium Workgroup. 2009 [Google Scholar]
- Stern AH. A quantitative assessment of the carcinogenicity of hexavalent chromium by the oral route and its relevance to human exposure. Environ Res. 2010;110:798–807. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2010.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Suzuki Y, Fukuda K. Reduction of hexavalent chromium by ascorbic acid and glutathione with special reference to the rat lung. Arch Toxicol. 1990;64:169–176. doi: 10.1007/BF02010721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tarasub N, Tarasub C, Ayutthaya WDN. Effects of Quercetin on Acute Toxicity of Rat Spleen and Chromosome Aberrations in Bone Marrow Induced by Hexavalent Chromium. Thammasat Med J. 2008;8(3):306–316. [Google Scholar]
- Terpilowska S, Siwicki R. The influence of chromium on cell-mediated and humoral-mediated immunity in mice. Central European J Immunol. 2010;35(1):10–13. [Google Scholar]
- Thompson C. M, Haws L. C, Harris M. A, Gatto N. M, Proctor D. M. Application of the U.S. EPA mode of action Framework for purposes of guiding future research: a case study involving the oral carcinogenicity of hexavalent chromium. Toxicol Sci. 2011;119:20–40. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfq320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Torra M, Rodamilans M, Corbella J, Ferrer R, Mazzara R. Blood chromium determination in assessing reference values in an unexposed Mediterranean population. Biol Trace Element Res. 1999;70:183–189. doi: 10.1007/BF02783859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) Toxicological review of hexavalent chromium. Washington, DC: 1998. http://www.epa.gov/ncea/iris/toxreviews/0144-tr.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Vasant C, Balamurugan K, Rajaram R, Ramasami T. Apoptosis of lymphocytes in the presence of Cr (V) complexes: Role in Cr (VI)-induced toxicity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;285:1354–60. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.5335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vilcheck SK, O’Brien TJ, Pritchard DE, Ha L, Ceryak S, Fornsaglio JL, Patierno SR. Fanconi anemia complementation group A cells are hypersensitive to chromium (VI)-induced toxicity. Environ Health Persp. 2002;110(5):773–7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110s5773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang JY, Wicklund BH, Gustilo RB, Tsukayama DT. Prosthetic metals impair murine immune response and cytokine release in vivo and in vitro. J Orthop Res. 1997;15:688–99. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100150510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weber H. Long-term study of the distribution of soluble chromate-51 in the rat after a single intratracheal administration. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1983;11:749–764. doi: 10.1080/15287398309530382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Werfel U, Langen V, Eickhoff I, Schoonbrood J, Vahrenholz C, Brauksiepe A, Popp W, Norpoth K. Elevated DNA single-strand breakage frequencies in lymphocytes of welders exposed to chromium and nickel. Carcinogen. 1998;19:413–418. doi: 10.1093/carcin/19.3.413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WHO (World Health Organization) Chromium in biological monitoring of chemical exposure in the workplace guidelines. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1996. pp. 91–111. [Google Scholar]
- Wiegand HJ, Ottenwälder H, Bolt HM. Bioavailability and metabolism of hexavalent chromium compounds. Toxicol Environ Chem. 1987;14(4):263–275. [Google Scholar]
- Wiegand HJ, Ottenwalder H, Bolt HM. Disposition of intratracheally administered chromium(III) and chromium(VI) in rabbits. Toxicol Lett. 1984;22(2):273–6. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(84)90078-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xiao F, Chen D, Luo L, Zhong X, Xie Y, Zou L, Zeng M, Guan L, Zhong C. Time-order effects of vitamin C on hexavalent chromium-induced mitochondrial damage and DNA-protein crosslinks in cultured rat peripheral blood lymphocytes. Mol Med Rep. 2013;8(1):53–60. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2013.1462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang JD, Li S. Cancer mortality in a Chinese population exposed to hexavalent chromium in water. J Occup Environ Med. 1997;39:315–9. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199704000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang XH, Zhang X, Wang XC, Jin LF, Yang ZP, Jiang CX, Chen Q, Ren XB, Cao JZ, Wang Q, Zhu YM. Chronic occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium causes DNA damage in electroplating workers. BMC Pub. Health. 2011;11:224. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhitkovich A, Song Y, Quievryn G, Voitkun V. Non-oxidative mechanisms are responsible for the induction of mutagenesis by reduction of Cr(VI) with cysteine: role of ternary DNA adducts in Cr(III)-dependent mutagenesis. Biochem. 2001;40(2):549–60. doi: 10.1021/bi0015459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhumabaeva AN, Zarishnyak NV, Bekmukhambetov E. Zh. Immunotropic Effects of Hexavalent Chromium Soluble Compounds on the Thymus and Peripheral Blood Values in a Subacute Experiment. Bulletin Exp Biol Med. 2014;156(4):512–517. doi: 10.1007/s10517-014-2387-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


