Skip to main content
Interdisciplinary Toxicology logoLink to Interdisciplinary Toxicology
. 2017 May 17;9(1):25–29. doi: 10.1515/intox-2016-0004

Toxicity of Glandularia selloi (Spreng.) Tronc. leave extract by MTT and neutral red assays: influence of the test medium procedure

Luciana Rizzieri Figueiró 1, Luana Christine Comerlato 2, Marcia Vignoli Da Silva 3, José Ângelo Silveira Zuanazzi 4, Gilsane Lino Von Poser 4, Ana Luiza Ziulkoski 1,
PMCID: PMC5458111  PMID: 28652844

Abstract

Cytotoxicity assays using cell cultures may be an alternative to assess biological toxicity of plant extracts with potential phytotherapeutic properties. This study compared three methods to prepare culture media for the exposure of Vero cells to plant extracts. Leaves of Glandularia selloi (Spreng.) Tronc. were used to prepare culture medium with aqueous extract, extract in culture medium and methanol extract. Toxicity was assessed using the MTT and neutral red (NR) assays. In general, alterations in the cellular functions were found in all extracts and assays. Cytotoxic effect occurred at lower doses in aqueous extract and the range of effect of the methanol extract was small. The procedure of preparing the test medium has an effect on the outcome of the assay. Cytotoxicity of plant extract can be assessed by MTT and NR assays. Aqueous extract added to the culture medium presented the best profile to assess cytotoxicity.

Keywords: cytotoxicity, mitochondrial activity, lysosomal viability, herbal medicine, Vero cell, cell culture medium

Introduction

Traditional or alternative medicine, including herbal medicines, is widely used around the world for both cultural and historical reasons as well as economic factors (World Health Organization, 2013). Phytotherapy has been used in prophylaxis, cure or management of signs and symptoms (World Health Organization, 2005). However, the therapeutic potential of an herb needs to be confronted with the health risks to ensure its safe use.

Safety, efficacy and quality of herbal medicines are the most important challenges of research in traditional medicine. The World Health Organization (WHO) developed technical guidelines and methodologies for research into these products (World Health Organization, 2013), noting however also that some countries do not follow any regulatory requirements for safety assessment of herbal medicines (World Health Organization, 2005). Moreover, approximately 20,000 herbal products were reported to have limited evidence of safety and efficacy (Bent, 2008).

In Brazil, the safety of herbal medicine is assessed by bibliographic surveys, preclinical or clinical trials or traditional use (Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, 2010). The recommended preclinical trials concern classical toxicity tests in animals (Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, 2004). Recently consciousness of ethical issues pertaining to animal experimentation has become more prominent, increasing the need to reduce, replace and refine animal testing (Piersma, 2006). Furthermore, it has also been argued that animal testing is expensive, time-consuming and limited in sample size (U.S. Congress, 1986). Alternative methodologies in biomedical research have lately become the focus of discussion.

From the mid-1980s onwards, cell culture technology began to be extensively used in toxicological research (Zucco et al., 2004). In vitro toxicological tests allow the direct or indirect contact of a xenobiotic with the cell culture, thus enabling to assess cell changes. Different mechanisms may be evaluated depending on the assay and the cell type used (Rogero et al., 2003; Freshney, 2005; Khatibisepehr et al., 2011). Some of the most used assays are the neutral red (NR) uptake by lysosomes and the mitochondrial activity test using MTT (Fotakis & Timbrell, 2006). They produce significant data within a short period of time, and that relatively cheaply and with high sensitivity (Rogero et al., 2003). Both assays are considered reproducible in vitro test methods for screening potentially many toxic agents (Mosmann, 1983; National Institutes of Health, 2006). These characteristics suggest that cytotoxicity assays in cell cultures may be used to advantage for assessing the toxicological potential of phytotherapeutic samples (Suares Rocha et al., 2010).

The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of two in vitro tests for assessing the cytotoxic effects of plant leave extracts. Moreover, since there are no specific sample preparation protocols for these tests, we evaluated the influence of the recovery vehicle in the performance of the assays.

Methods

Sampling and sample collection

Samples of Glandularia selloi (Spreng.) Tronc. (Verbenaceae) were collected in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, in Osório, Morro da Borussia, during the flowering period (November). A voucher specimen is deposited in the ICN Herbarium of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (number 190416). Glandularia selloi is a creeping plant abundant in Rio Grande do Sul in southern Brazil (Thode & Mentz, 2010). Some native taxa Verbenaceae are used for numerous medical purposes, for example Aloysia gratissima (Gillies & Hook.) Tronc., Lippia alba (Mill.) NEBr. and Verbena officinalis L. (Von Poser et al., 1997; Akerreta et al., 2007; Zeni et al., 2011). This stimulated the interest in Glandularia selloi (Spreng.) Tronc., which is not used in folk medicine yet has botanical kinship with V. officinalis (Thode & Mentz, 2010).

Leaves of the plant were dried in a ventilated place at room temperature and subsequently pulverized in a knife mill. The amount of 0.25 mg of powdered material weighed on an analytical balance was moved to a test tube with a lid after adding 5 mL of methanol. The samples were subjected to ultrasonic extraction for 2 hours without heating. The solution was filtered with filter paper. Afterwards the solution was moved to a 10.0 mL volumetric flask and the volume was adjusted. The filtrate was evaporated to dryness at 40°C in a rotary evaporator.

Preparation of samples and media test

Dry extracts of the leaves were prepared by three different methods.

Method 1 (Aqueous Extract): Water (2mL) was added to the dry extract and filtered using a 0.22 μm filter. The aqueous extract was mixed with Dulbecco’s modification of Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Sigma Aldrich) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Cultilab), 10,000 U/mL penicillin and 10 ng/mL streptomycin (Sigma Aldrich) (standard conditions). The samples were diluted to obtain solutions at 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5 and 10% of the aqueous extract in culture medium.

Method 2 (Extract in Culture Medium): Methanol was added to the dry extract (2 mg/mL). The volume of the extract was reduced by nitrogen evaporation. This dry extract was resuspended in DMEM under standard conditions at the concentration of 2 mg/mL and sterilized by 0.22 μm filter. The samples were diluted to obtain solutions at 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 μg/mL of the extract in culture medium and cytotoxicity assays were performed.

Method 3 (Methanol Extract): Methanol was added to dry extract (2 mg/mL). The volume of the extract was dried in water bath at 37°C and redissolved in methanol at the concentration of 2 mg/mL. After sterilization by a 0.22 μm filter, the samples were diluted in DMEM under standard conditions to obtain solutions at 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 μg/mL of the extract in culture medium. A methanol control was performed with the solution at 5% in the culture medium.

Cell culture and treatment

Vero cells were kindly donated by Ph.D. Fernando Rosado Spilki (Feevale, Brazil). These cells are derived from kidney epithelial cells of a normal adult African Green Monkey.

The cells were grown in DMEM in standard conditions. Culture was maintained at 37°C in a humid atmosphere at 5% of CO2 and a half-open system, and trypsinization was used for cell maintenance.

For exposure to extracts, the cells were seeded at a rate of 1.5 x 104 cells/well in a 96-well polystyrene microplate. After the cultures had reached 50% of confluence, the culture medium was replaced by the media prepared using one of the three methods at different concentrations and the cells were exposed for 24 hours. Negative control was done with DMEM under standard conditions. All assays were performed in quadruplicates.

Cytotoxicity assay using MTT reduction

In order to evaluate cytotoxicity using the mitochondrial activity parameter, a 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was used as described by Mosmann (1983). After exposure for 24 hours, the assay was performed according to Trintinaglia et al. (2015). Briefly, 20 μL of MTT 1.67 mg/mL (Sigma Aldrich) was added to the well and the plates were incubated for two hours. After incubation, the medium was removed by inversion and 200 μL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added to each well for solubilization. All samples were transferred to a 96-well plate and absorbance was measured at 570 nm with a microplate spectrophotometer.

For the purpose of testing the reaction of extract per se, an additional test was carried out. Before MTT incubation, the culture medium with aqueous extract was removed and 200μL of DMEM without serum was added to each well. The assay was performed immediately as described above.

Cytotoxicity assay by neutral red incorporation

The neutral red (NR) incorporation method, described by Borenfreund and Puerner (1985), was used to evaluate cytotoxicity through lysosome viability. After exposure for 24 hours, the assay was performed according to Trintinaglia et al. (2015). Briefly, the culture medium was removed and 200 μL of DMEM without serum and containing 50 μg/mL of NR (Sigma Aldrich) was added to each well. After three hours of incubation, the medium was removed and the cells were washed with buffered saline solution (PBS), followed by another washing with a fixative solution (1% CaCl2 in 0.5% formaldehyde). After discarding by inversion, 200 μL of 1% acetic acid in 50% ethanol was added for the solubilization of the dye. The samples were gently shaken for 10 minutes for full dissolution. All samples were transferred to a 96-well plate and the absorbance was measured at 540 nm with a microplate spectrophotometer.

Statistical analysis

Data obtained from in vitro cytotoxicity assays were expressed as mean and standard deviation. One-way ANOVA and the Duncan or Scheffe post-test were used for statistical analysis with the IBM SPSS Statistics 19.0 for Windows. To assess the interference of the extract in MTT assay, two-way ANOVA was performed. All results were evaluated using a significance level of p<0.05.

Results

The results of cytotoxicity assays are presented in Figure 1. Alterations in the cellular functions were found in all extracts and assays. Cytotoxic effect occurred at lower doses in aqueous extract, i.e. the culture medium with extract resulted in mitochondrial activity or lysosomal viability below 70% of negative control. The methanol extract had the slightest range of effect. The methanol control was equal to the negative control (p=0.989 to MTT and p=1.000 to NR). Exchange of the culture medium before the incubation in the MTT assay yielded no difference from the usual procedure (Finteraction = 1.60; p=0.199) (Figure 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Cytotoxicity assays of leaves of Glandularia selloi extract in Vero cells. Left: MTT assay (mitochondrial activity). Right: neutral red assay (lysosomal viability). Values are presented relative to the negative control. The dashed line presents 70% of the control value. Values below are considered cytotoxic. The sign and letters present significance statistics. * p<0.05, in comparison to negative control. The letters show significance statistics in the same extract: means with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05), whereas means with similar letters do not differ from each other.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Influence of incubation procedure to MTT assay in Vero cells. *p<0.05 (for the same concentration).

Discussion

Since the MTT assay has been widely used as a screening test to evaluate the cytotoxicity in vitro, its applicability in assessing toxicity in plant extracts has been promising. In this study, the MTT and NR assays were able to show cellular effects of the plant extract. Moreover, the aqueous extract seemed to have the most characteristic cytotoxic profile.

The MTT assay is a rapid, economic, sensitive and accurate test to determine in vitro deleterious effects of several substances. It shows the disruption of a critical biochemical function and effects of early cytotoxicity (Malich et al., 1997). The test is based on the technique developed by Mosmann (1983), in which a yellow tetrazole water soluble salt MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) is reduced in the inner mitochondrial membrane to a purple formazan salt by the action of succinate dehydrogenase. The resulting product indicates the mitochondrial activity status and reflects the number of viable cells (Triglia et al., 1991; Butler, 2004; Freshney, 2005, Vanden Berghe et al., 2013).

However, formazan is produced by activated cells even in the absence of proliferation (Mosmann, 1983). Moreover, in dead cells, the mitochondria may remain with intact succinate dehydrogenase activity, which is misinterpreted as survival. The cytoplasm, endosome/ lysosome compartment and the plasma membrane may be associated with MTT reduction (Berridge et al., 2005). Some compounds may also enhance or reduce succinate dehydrogenase activity without affecting survival (Vanden Berghe et al., 2013) or still interact per se with the salt MTT (Shoemaker et al., 2004, Peng et al., 2005; Lupu & Popescu, 2013). The latter is particularly important since many plant extracts have compounds with intrinsic reductive potential, such as thiols or other antioxidants (Bruggisser et al., 2002, Shoemaker et al., 2004). This does not seem to occur with the aqueous extract since the effect of different concentrations did not depend on the procedure used in MTT assay as there was no interaction between them. This indicates that it is not necessary to change the medium before incubation.

A further assay that provides a quantitative estimation of the number of viable cells is the NR assay, described by Borenfreund and Puerner in 1985. It is based on the capacity of a vital soluble dye to cross the plasmatic membrane and be incorporated in lysosomes of viable cells (Borenfreund et al., 1988; Triglia et al., 1991). In normal conditions, the lysosome presents a pH lower than that of the cytoplasm. The dye trapped by the lysosome becomes charged and is unable to leave the interior of the organelle. Damaged lysosomes decrease the amount of dye retained by the culture. Thus lysosomal integrity is a highly sensitive indicator of cell viability (Repetto et al., 2008). Since its introduction, this assay has proved technically fast, simple, cheap, sensitive and reproducible (Zhang et al., 1990). The lysosome is the terminal organelle of the endocytic pathway, thus the NR assay is considered to be the measurement endpoint (National Institutes of Health, 2001; Česen et al., 2012).

Both assays use colorimetric measurements to define the number of viable cells after exposure to xenobiotics. However, different cytotoxicity assays may yield different results as each assay determines a different function (Borenfreund et al., 1988, Kim et al., 2009) and the absence of mitochondrial or lysosomal damage does not indicate nonexistence of cellular injury. Studies with different substances found that NR and MTT assays possessed a higher sensitivity for the detection of toxicity than did other assays, as e.g. lactate dehydrogenase and protein content assays (Arechabala et al., 1999; Fotakis & Timbrell, 2006). Thus these two checkpoints have been commonly used with a reasonable degree of success since they are based on cellular events that have indirect if not direct relevance to cellular responses to chemicals in vivo (National Institutes of Health, 2001). On the other hand, the effects may be different depending on the exposure time. One of the problems in evaluating toxicity is the choice of exposure time influencing the targets to be monitored (Zucco et al., 2004). Lack of an adverse cellular event does not indicate absence of damage since only one timepoint was analyzed and the kinetics of the cell death process were not established.

The plant extracts caused alterations in the two assays studied, suggesting that there were substances in these extracts that interfered with cell function. In general, the two tests showed similar results. The dose-response relationship in the MTT assay was not always established as higher concentrations showed in some instances an increased functionality than did lower concentrations. The aim of this work was not to investigate substances in Glandularia selloi responsible for the cellular effect, however leaves of herbal medicine may be rich in flavonoids and other substances with protective effect (Bent, 2008) that consequently increase cellular response in more concentrated solutions. A study for establishing this possibility is being prepared.

The results differed according to the method of preparation of the extract. It is a critical stage because the extract should correspond to the content of the crude product. Different biologically active compounds may be released according to the solvent used due to the physicochemical properties of the substances and the interaction between them. This can have a direct impact on cellular outcomes and it may be interesting to run experiments with different sample preparation in order to identify different effect profiles. Methanol extract was the one that showed the lowest range of effect. As it was the one to be heated, it may be assumed that temperature influenced the activity of cytotoxic substances. This hypothesis needs to be proven in further studies. Moreover, it is important to consider the effect of the recovery vehicle, which may be downward and mask a possible dose-dependent effect. It does not seem to be the case in this study since the methanol at 5% (the highest concentration in the dilutions) was equal to the negative control.

Compounds need to be chemically characterized and investigated for their pharmacological and toxicological properties. As herbal medicines are highly complex mixtures of potentially active ingredients, the isolated natural compounds and the final product should undergo the same tests (Bunel et al., 2014).

Conclusion

Our study showed that MTT and NR assays can be valuable tools for determining the cytotoxicity of leaves of Glandularia selloi under controlled in vitro conditions. However, some factors may affect the outcome of the assays. We found that aqueous extract added to the culture medium presented the best profile for assessing cytotoxicity. The extract reduced by nitrogen evaporation and recovery in culture medium provides a better choice compared to work with methanol extract.

Acknowledgements

Feevale University for the infrastructure and financial support, CAPES and CNPq.

Declaration of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Resolução-RDC n° 14, de 31 de março de 2010. Brasil: Brasília; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  2. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Resolução n° 90, de 16 de março de 2004. Brasil: Brasília; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  3. Akerreta S, Cavero RY, Calvo MI. First comprehesive contribution to medical ethnobotany of wester pyrenes. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2007;3:26. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-3-26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Arechabala B, Coiffard C, Rivalland P, Coiffard LJ, de Roeck-Holtzhauer Y. Comparison of cytotoxicity of various surfactants tested on normal human fibroblast cultures using the neutral red test, MTT assay and LDH release. J Appl Toxicol. 1999;19:163–65. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1263(199905/06)19:3<163::aid-jat561>3.0.co;2-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bent S. Herbal medicine in the United States: review of efficacy, safety, and regulation: grand rounds at University of California, San Francisco Medical Center. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:854–59. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0632-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Berridge MV, Herst PM, Tan AS. Tetrazolium dyes as tools in cell biology: new insights into their cellular reduction. Biotechnol Annu Rev. 2005;11:12752. doi: 10.1016/S1387-2656(05)11004-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Borenfreund E, Puerner JA. Toxicity determined in vitro by morphological alterations and neutral red absorption. Toxicol Lett. 1985;24:119–24. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(85)90046-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Borenfreund E, Babich H, Martin-Alguacil N. Comparisons of two in vitro cytotoxicity assays-the neutral red (nr) and tetrazolium mtt tests. Toxicol In Vitro. 1988;2:1–6. doi: 10.1016/0887-2333(88)90030-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bruggisser R, von Daeniken K, Jundt G, Schaffner W, Tullberg-Reinert H. Interference of plant extracts, phytoestrogens and antioxidants with the MTT tetrazolium assay. Planta Medica. 2002;68:445–8. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-32073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bunel V, Ouedraogo M, Nguyen AT, Stévigny C, Duez P. Methods applied to the in vitro primary toxicology testing of natural products: State of the art, strengths, and limits. Planta Med. 2014 doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1360273. [Epub in print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Butler M. Animal cell culture and technology. 2a Ed. London, England: Taylor & Francis; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  12. Česen MH, Pegan K, Spes A, Turk B. Lysosomal pathways to cell death and their therapeutic applications. Exp Cell Res. 2012;318:1245–51. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2012.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fotakis G, Timbrell JA. In vitro cytotoxicity assays: comparison of LDH, neutral red, MTT and protein assay in hepatoma cell lines following exposure to cadmium chloride. Toxicol Lett. 2006;160:171–7. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2005.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Freshney RI. Culture of animal cells: a manual of basic technique. 5a. Ed. New Jersey, U.S.: Wiley-Blackwell; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  15. Khatibisepehr S, Huang B, Ibrahim F, Xing JZ, Roa W. Data-based modeling and prediction of cytotoxicity induced by contaminants in water resources. Comput Biol Chem. 2011;35:69–80. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2011.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kim H, Yoon SC, Lee TY, Jeong D. Discriminative cytotoxicity assessment based on various cellular damages. Toxicol Lett. 2009;184:13–7. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lupu AR, Popescu T. The noncellular reduction of MTT tetrazolium salt by TiO2 nanoparticles and its implications for cytotoxicity assays. Toxicol In Vitro. 2013;27:1445–50. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2013.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Malich G, Markovic B, Winder C. The sensitivity and specificity of the MTS tetrazolium assay for detecting the in vitro cytotoxicity of 20 chemicals using human cell lines. Toxicology. 1997;124:179–92. doi: 10.1016/s0300-483x(97)00151-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assays for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983;65:55–63. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. National Institutes of Health. Background Review Document (BRD): Validation of Neutral Red Uptake Test Methods NIH/In Vitro Cytotoxicity Test Methods for Estimating Acute Oral Systemic Toxicity. 2006. Publication No. 07-4518, November 2006. Available at: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/iccvam/docs/acutetox_docs/BRD_TMER/BRDvol1_Nov2006.pdf Accessed on 16 April 2014.
  21. National Institutes of Health. Report of the International Workshop on In Vitro Methods for Assessing Acute Systemic Toxicity. NC: National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park; 2001. NIH Publication No. 01-4499. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/hpv/pubs/general/nih2001a.pdf Accessed on 16 April 2014. [Google Scholar]
  22. Peng L, Wang B, Ren P. Reduction of MTT by flavonoids in the absence of cells. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2005;45:108–11. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2005.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Piersma AH. Alternative Methods for Developmental Toxicity Testing. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2006;98:427–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2006.pto_373.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Repetto G, del Peso A, Zurita JL. Neutral red uptake assay for the estimation of cell viability/cytotoxicity. Nat Protoc. 2008;3:1125–31. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rogero SO, Lugão AB, Ikeda TI, Cruz AS. Teste in vitro de cytotoxicidade: estudo comparativo entre duas metodologias. Mat Res. 2003;6:317–20. [Google Scholar]
  26. Shoemaker M, Cohen I, Campbell M. Reduction of MTT by aqueous herbal extracts in the absence of cells. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004;93:381–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2004.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Suares Rocha P, Azab E, Schmidt B, Storch V, Hollert H, Braunbeck T. Changes in toxicity and dioxin-like activity of sediments from the Tietê River (São Paulo, Brazil) Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2010;73:550–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2009.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Thode VA, Mentz LA. The genus Glandularia J.F. Gmel. (Verbenaceae) in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Acta Bot Bras; 2010. p. 24. [On line]. Available at: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-33062010000200023. Accessed on 13 Aug 2014. [Google Scholar]
  29. Triglia D, Sherard Braa S, Yonan C, Naughton GK. Cytotoxicity testing using neutral red and mtt assays on a three- dimensional human skin substrate. Toxicol In Vitro. 1991;5:573–8. doi: 10.1016/0887-2333(91)90096-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Trintinaglia L, Bianchi E, Basso da Silva L, Nascimento CA, Spilki FR, Ziulkoski AL. Cytotoxicity assays as tools to assess water quality in the Sinos river basin. Braz J Biol. 2015;75(2 suppl):75–80. doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.0113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment. Alternatives to Animal Use in Research, Testing, and Education. Washington, DC, U.S: Government Printing Office; 1986. [Google Scholar]
  32. Vanden Berghe T, Grootjans S, Goossens V, Dondelinger Y, Krysko DV, Takahashi N, Vandenabeele P. Determination of apoptotic and necrotic cell death in vitro and in vivo. Methods. 2013;61:117–29. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Von Poser GL, Toffoli ME, Sobral M, Henriques AT. Iridoid glucosides substitution patterns in Verbenaceae and their taxonomic implication. Plant Syst Evol. 1997;205:265–87. [Google Scholar]
  34. World Health Organization. National policy on traditional medicine and regulation of herbal medicines. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  35. World Health Organization. WHO traditional medicine strategy: 2014-2023. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  36. Zeni ALB, Zombowski ADE, Dal-Cim T, Maraschin M, Rodrigues ALS, Tasca CI. Antidepressant-like and neuroprotective effects of Aloysia gratissima: Investigation of involvement of L-arginina-nitric oxide-cyclic guanoside monophosphate pathway. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011;37:864–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2011.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhang SZ, Lipsky MM, Trump BF, Hsu IC. Neutral red (NR) assay for cell viability and xenobiotic-induced cytotoxicity in primary cultures of human and rat hepatocytes. Cell Biology and Toxicology. 1990;6:219–34. doi: 10.1007/BF00249595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Zucco F, De Angelis I, Testai E, Stammati A. Toxicology investigations with cell culture systems: 20 years after. Toxicol In Vitro. 2004;18:153–63. doi: 10.1016/s0887-2333(03)00147-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Interdisciplinary Toxicology are provided here courtesy of Slovak Toxicology Society SETOX & Institute of Experimental Pharmacology and Toxicology, Slovak Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES