Skip to main content
FEBS Open Bio logoLink to FEBS Open Bio
. 2017 Apr 25;7(6):777–788. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.12218

The Hfq regulon of Neisseria meningitidis

Robert A G Huis in ‘t Veld 1,, Gertjan Kramer 2,4, Arie van der Ende 1,3, Dave Speijer 2, Yvonne Pannekoek 1
PMCID: PMC5458458  PMID: 28593133

Abstract

The conserved RNA‐binding protein, Hfq, has multiple regulatory roles within the prokaryotic cell, including promoting stable duplex formation between small RNAs and mRNAs, and thus hfq deletion mutants have pleiotropic phenotypes. Previous proteome and transcriptome studies of Neisseria meningitidis have generated limited insight into differential gene expression due to Hfq loss. In this study, reversed‐phase liquid chromatography combined with data‐independent alternate scanning mass spectrometry (LC‐MSE) was utilized for rapid high‐resolution quantitative proteomic analysis to further elucidate the differentially expressed proteome of a meningococcal hfq deletion mutant. Whole‐cell lysates of N. meningitidis serogroup B H44/76 wild‐type (wt) and H44/76Δhfqhfq) grown in liquid growth medium were subjected to tryptic digestion. The resulting peptide mixtures were separated by liquid chromatography (LC) prior to analysis by mass spectrometry (MSE). Differential expression was analyzed by Student's t‐test with control for false discovery rate (FDR). Reliable quantitation of relative expression comparing wt and Δhfq was achieved with 506 proteins (20%). Upon FDR control at  0.05, 48 up‐ and 59 downregulated proteins were identified. From these, 81 were identified as novel Hfq‐regulated candidates, while 15 proteins were previously found by SDS/PAGE/MS and 24 with microarray analyses. Thus, using LC‐MSE we have expanded the repertoire of Hfq‐regulated proteins. In conjunction with previous studies, a comprehensive network of Hfq‐regulated proteins was constructed and differentially expressed proteins were found to be involved in a large variety of cellular processes. The results and comparisons with other gram‐negative model systems, suggest still unidentified sRNA analogs in N. meningitidis.

Keywords: Hfq, mass spectrometry, Neisseria meningitidis, proteomics, ribo‐regulation, sRNA


Abbreviations

FDR

false discovery rate

Fur

ferric uptake regulator

LC

liquid chromatography

LPS

lipopolysaccharides

MS

mass spectrometry

OMP

outer membrane protein

sRNA

small RNA

TCA

tricarboxylic acid

WT

wild‐type

Zur

zinc uptake regulator

The human pathogen Neisseria meningitidis is significant in causing major clinical syndromes such as fulminant septicemia and meningitis. The virulence of N. meningitidis results in a high morbidity and mortality rate worldwide regardless of widespread vaccination and available treatment 1, 2.

Ribo‐regulation in prokaryotes uses small antisense RNAs (sRNAs) to regulate the expression of gene systems by RNA–RNA interaction. In recent reviews, the diversity of sRNAs influencing target function expression or mRNA stability, which achieves both target activation and repression has been discussed 3, 4, 5. The widely conserved chaperone protein Hfq is pivotal for ribo‐regulation, regulating metabolic pathways and virulence gene expression 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.

Previously, the role of Hfq as a potential virulence factor in N. meningitidis has been assessed by transcriptomic approaches such as (tiling) microarrays 11, 12 or proteomic approaches such as SDS/PAGE protein separation followed by mass spectrometry (MS) 13, 14. The transcriptomic approach has led to the discovery and identification of two Hfq dependent sRNAs as being involved in iron metabolism 15 and survival in oxygen‐limited environments 12. SDS/PAGE protein separation, however, has its limitations in being laborious, having restricted physical resolution, and difficulty in detecting hydrophobic integral membrane proteins and low‐copy number proteins 16, 17, 18, 19. Therefore, only a limited amount of proteins can be differentiated and subsequently identified using MS analysis.

Reversed‐phase liquid chromatography (LC) prior to analysis by data‐independent alternate scanning mass spectrometry (MSE) allows for the absolute quantitation of hundreds of proteins in a complex mixture. LC‐MSE can be optimized for a standardized workflow that has a stable performance and efficiency throughout the experiment, facilitating high reproducibility 20, 21, 22. We applied LC‐MSE analysis of differential protein expression in wild‐type vs. Hfq‐deficient meningococcal cells. The differential protein expression may be the result of (a) a direct interaction between Hfq, sRNA, and the mRNA encoding the differentially expressed protein, (b) more indirectly from the interaction between Hfq, sRNA, and a mRNA encoding other regulatory proteins, and (c) downstream effects from these directly and indirectly Hfq‐regulated proteins. When possible, we further identified proteins which translation is directly influenced by Hfq and those that are differentially expressed by indirect regulatory effects. The data were then validated by comparing them with previously published experiments. The resulting identified core set of proteins directly and indirectly regulated by Hfq combined with a review of the N. meningitidis metabolome led to a reassessment of the overall function of the Hfq regulon in this obligate human pathogen.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

The N. meningitidis strain H44/76, B:P1.7,16:F3‐3: ST‐32 (cc32), is closely related to the serogroup B strain MC58 and belongs to the same clonal complex 23. Neisseria meningitidis H44/76 hfq deletion mutant was created as described in a previous article 13. Neisseria meningitidis H44/76 was chosen for its high natural competence, it has seen limited plate culture passages since being isolated from a patient in Norway in 1976, and has not been genetically modified 24. Neisseria meningitidis H44/76 wild‐type (wt) and H44/76Δhfqhfq) were grown overnight on GC agar plates (Difco, BD Diagnostics, Sparks, MD, USA) supplemented with 1% (v/v) Vitox (Oxoid Ltd, Hampshire, UK) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. Four biological wt replicates and three biological replicates of Δhfq were incubated in 50 mL GC medium supplemented with 1% (v/v) Vitox in 100‐mL Erlenmeyer flasks (OD530 ~ 0.05) fixed on a gyratory shaker (180 RPM) at 37 °C. No antibiotic selective pressure was needed since Δhfq was constructed as a complete chromosomal knockout. Previous experiments have shown that in a trans‐complemented mutant the protein expression profile was restored to wt levels 13, therefore this strain was not used in the LC‐MSE experiment. Growth was monitored by measuring optical density of cultures at 530 nm (OD530; Pharmacia Biotech Ultraspec 2000, Biochrom Ltd, Cambridge, England) at regular intervals. At the completion of all experiments, cultures were plated on Columbia Agar supplemented with defibrinated sheep blood and incubated at 37 °C to verify cultures were viable and axenic. Cultures were harvested at logarithmic planktonic growth (OD530 ~ 0.5, t ~ 2 h for wt, t ~ 3 h for Δhfq) by pipetting 1 mL (~ 2.5 × 109 CFU) of culture to 1 mL of ice‐cold phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS). The mixture was immediately centrifuged at 16.000 RCF at 4 °C, followed by washing of the pellet with PBS and centrifuged again. Next, pellets were frozen at −20 °C overnight.

Reverse‐phase liquid chromatography followed by data‐independent alternate scanning mass spectrometry

Frozen pellets were suspended in 0.1% RapiGest SF Surfactant (Waters corporation, Milford, MA, USA)/50 mm NH4HCO3 pH 8.0 (Sigma‐Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany), incubated for 1 h on ice and refrozen. Protein content of all samples was determined by standard bicinchoninic acid assay (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) using the manufacturers protocol. Proteolysis of the samples was performed overnight and subsequent removal of Rapigest surfactant was performed according to the protocol provided with Rapigest SF for in solution digestion using 1 : 50 (w/w) ratio of trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI, USA):protein. Next, peptides were mixed 1 : 1 (v/v) with 100 nm ADH1 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae digest standard (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) before being separated by reversed‐phase chromatography and analyzed by data‐independent (MSE) label‐free mass spectrometry as described before 25 on a Synapt‐G2 quadrupole time‐of‐flight mass spectrometer (Waters Corporation). Continuum LC‐MSE data were processed and searched using proteinlynx globalserver version 2.5 (PLGS 2.5; Waters). The parameter settings were: digest reagent—trypsin; allow 1 ‘missed cleavage’; search tolerances automatic (typically 5 ppm for precursor and 15 ppm for product ions); fixed modification—cysteine carbamidomethylation; variable modification—methionine oxidation. Protein identifications were obtained by searching N. meningitidis MC58 database (UniProt release 2012_03) extended with common protein contaminants, as well as ADH1 from S. cerevisiae (the internal standard), to address technical variation and check for concentration differences between samples 20. Details regarding HI3 peptide quantitation can be found in 20 and, especially, 21. Further information regarding reproducibility and reliability with regard to the relative quantitation (wt vs. hfq deletion mutant) can be obtained from the supplementary information.

Data analysis

Differential expression was analyzed by Student's t‐test (two‐tailed distribution, equal variances) with false discovery rate (FDR) control according to Benjamini–Hochberg (BH) 26. The original BH procedure was chosen over later approaches that refine for the dependency problem as previous experiments have shown Hfq to regulate a wide range of proteins and the more naïve linear step‐up procedure offers the most conservative estimate in this situation 27. To allow for statistical analysis of proteins only detected in 1 condition, proteins in other samples were assumed to be quantified at least 10% lower than the lowest detected protein (0.11). The samples were given the value 0.10 in order to minimize overestimation of significance and fold‐regulation. Only proteins with q‐values ≤ 0.05 FDR (BH) were considered differentially regulated. Gene identification was taken from the original N. meningitidis MC58 annotation 28 and updated with the aid of recent literature 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 and BLAST searches 37. Phase and antigenic variable genes were identified as reported 38, 39, 40, 41. A pathway or biological role was given based on KEGG 42 or Uniprot 43. Pathway analysis was further refined to apply specifically to the N. meningitidis genome 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51. Operon information was derived from previous transcriptome experiments in H44/76 52. Data from previous experiments were taken as reported in table 3 14, table 2 (iron replete condition) 11, table S1 12, and table 2 13.

Results and Discussion

Analysis of cellular protein content and reproducibility of LC‐MSE results

Protein concentrations of wt and Δhfq whole‐cell lysates were 1.14 mg·mL−1 (SD: 0.08) and 1.29 mg·mL−1 (SD: 0.07), respectively. Planktonic cells were harvested during the exponential growth phase at OD530 of 0.5 (~ 2.5 × 109 CFU·mL−1) and the protein content was estimated to be 0.5 pg per cell for both wt and Δhfq meningococcal strains. Average relative abundance of proteins detected in wt and Δhfq was comparable (R2 = 0.82; Fig. S1) and reproducible between individual replicates (Fig. S2). Volcano plots were created to visually represent statistical significance of the largest changes (Fig. S3). Finally, Venn diagrams were created to visualize comparisons of identified proteins between wt and Δhfq strains and within biological replicates of the two strains (Fig. S4). Raw output data from the proteinlynxglobalserver analysis program, encompassing all precursor, fragment, peptide, and protein data extracted from the raw files by the algorithm are available (Data S1). The LC‐MSE analysis in this experiment was shown to be robust and reliable, similar to that described in a recent comparative analysis 21.

Results of proteomic analysis of wt vs. Δhfq

From 2480 annotated open reading frames in H44/76 23, 937 proteins (38%) were detected. Reliable quantitation of relative expression comparing wt and Δhfq was achieved with 506 proteins (20%). Using FDR control at  0.05, 107 proteins were found differentially expressed, of which 48 and 59 were up‐ and downregulated, respectively (Table S1). From these proteins, 81 were identified as novel Hfq‐regulated candidates, while 15 proteins were previously found by SDS/PAGE/MS and 24 with microarray analyses (Fig. 1). The 107 differentially expressed proteins are involved in a variety of cellular processes and with information derived from the other 399 LC‐MSE detected proteins and previous Hfq analyses a substantial network of metabolic pathways can be constructed (Fig. S5). The major outer membrane proteins (OMPs) PorB and RmpM, which we considered as controls in a nonimmunogenic environment, showed stable expression 17, 53, 54.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Venn diagram showing correlations between results of this LC‐MSE study in red, the combined SDS/PAGE/MS results of Fantappiè et al. 14 and Pannekoek et al. 13 in blue, and the combined microarray results of Mellin et al. 11 and Fantappiè et al. 12 in green.

Table 1 was generated to validate the results obtained with LC‐MSE and to create an overview of the genes with robust experimental evidence of regulation by Hfq. It was created by taking all the genes that were consistently differentially regulated in more than one study involving microarray 11, 12, SDS/PAGE/MS 13, 14, and/or LC‐MSE with independently generated isogenic wt vs. Δhfq meningococcal strains. From 107 differentially regulated genes identified by LC‐MSE, 27 genes (25%) were independently corroborated by other experiments on the mRNA and/or protein level. Figure 2 is a graphical overview of the pathway or biological role these genes are involved in.

Table 1.

Summary of all genes consistently differentially regulated between N. meningitidis wt vs. Δhfq in more than one study involving independently generated isogenic meningococcal strains

Gene IDa Namea Functionb Pathway or Biological roleb LC‐MSE c SDS/PAGE/MSd Microarraye
Upregulated
NMB0177 Sodium/alanine symporter Membrane components 13.1 4.0
NMB0227 Mn2+–iron transporter Membrane components 3.3 2.4
NMB0317 queF 7‐cyano‐7‐deazaguanine reductase tRNA modification 4.5 4.5
NMB0325 rplU 50S ribosomal protein L21 Ribosomal proteins 22.9 5.2
NMB0430 prpB 2‐methylisocitrate lyase Propionate metabolism 9.1 20.4 28.2
NMB0431 prpC Methylcitrate synthase Propionate metabolism 3.8 1.6 23.9 56.7
NMB0432 tuaE f Anion (sulfite) transporter Membrane components & Propionate metabolism 5.9 3.9
NMB0435 ackA‐1 Acetate kinase Propionate metabolism 14.9 2.0 13.7 18.1
NMB0546 adhP Alcohol dehydrogenase Oxidoreductases 1.5 1.7
NMB0574 gcvT Aminomethyltransferase Amino acid metabolism 3.1 2.6
NMB0589 rplS 50S ribosomal protein L19 Ribosomal proteins 3.7 7.3
NMB0634 fpbA Iron ABC transporter Membrane components 1.3 1.5
NMB0649 Hypothetical protein Unknown 2.8 5.3
NMB0650 Hypothetical protein Unknown 9.4 4.8
NMB0791 ppiB Peptidyl–prolyl cis–trans isomerase B Protein folding 2.1 2.4
NMB0884 sodB Superoxide dismutase, Fe–Mn Oxidoreductases 3.5 1.7
NMB0859 Hypothetical protein Unknown 3.2 2.7
NMB0861 Hypothetical protein Unknown 2.1 2.8
NMB0865 Hypothetical protein Membrane components 5.9 12.8
NMB0866 Hypothetical protein Unknown 4.8 8.9
NMB0920 icd Isocitrate dehydrogenase TCA cycle 5.8 1.4 5.0
NMB0946 prx Peroxiredoxin 2 protein/glutaredoxin Oxidoreductases 1.4 2.0
NMB0954 gltA Citrate synthase TCA cycle 5.9 2.0 4.4
NMB1055 glyA Serine hydroxymethyltransferase Amino acid metabolism 6.5 3.0 5.4
NMB1306 zapE ATPase Cell division 2.6 2.8
NMB1378 iscR f Iron–sulfur cluster assembly transcription factor Iron–sulfur cluster biosynthesis 6.1 2.1
NMB1388 pgi‐1 Glucose‐6‐phosphate isomerase 1 Glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis 11.1 1.3 2.7
NMB1398 sodC Superoxide dismutase, Cu‐Zn Oxidoreductases 2.3
NMB1406 Hypothetical protein Membrane components 3.4 3.6
NMB1572 acnB Aconitate hydratase 2 TCA cycle & Propionate metabolism 7.6 2.3 2.7 4.5
NMB1584 mmsB f 3‐hydroxyacid dehydrogenase Unknown 38.9 1.9 6.7
NMB1599 Hypothetical protein Unknown 17.0 6.8
NMB1600 Hypothetical protein Unknown 3.8 3.6
NMB1764 Hypothetical protein Unknown 3.4 2.9
NMB1796 FMN reductase Oxidoreductases 2.6 2.9 3.3
NMB1946 metQ f Lipoprotein NlpA family Membrane components 2.3 2.6
NMB2136 Oligopeptide transporter Protein transport/translocation 3.7 4.0
Downregulated
NMB0335 dapD Tetrahydropyridine‐carboxylate succinyltransferase Amino acid metabolism −1.5 −2.3
NMB0378 cysP f Inorganic phosphate transporter Membrane components −7.7 −1.7
NMB0543 lctP f Putative l‐lactate permease Membrane components −2.2 −3.5
NMB0607 secD Protein translocase subunit Protein transport/translocation −4.0 −2.0 −2.6
NMB0748 hfq Host factor‐I protein RNA chaperone −289.3g −16.0g
NMB0763 cysK Cysteine synthase Amino acid metabolism −2.4 −2.7
NMB0881 cysT f Sulfate transport system permease Membrane components −7.3 −2.2
NMB1617 tehB Tellurite resistance protein/methyltransferase Response to tellurium ion −3.0 −2.1
NMB1934 atpD ATP synthase subunit beta Oxidative phosphorylation −1.7 −1.8 −2.2
NMB1935 atpG ATP synthase gamma chain Oxidative phosphorylation −1.8 −2.4

a Gene identification and name according to Tettelin et al. 28, updated based on literature published since. b Function, pathway, or biological role according to the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (http://www.kegg.jp/) and/or UniProt (http://www.uniprot.org/). c LC‐MSE results from this study, all genes  0.05 except NMB0791 (= 0.026). d SDS/PAGE/MS results taken from Fantappiè et al. 14 and Pannekoek et al. 13, respectively. e Microarray results taken from Mellin et al. 11 and Fantappiè et al. 12, respectively. f Inferred from homology with annotated genes in different strains or species. g This concerns the ratio of the signal transcripts from hfq in the wt and Δhfq. See Materials and methods for references.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Pie charts depicting the pathway or biological role of (A) upregulated genes and (B) downregulated genes as found in Table 1.

Four genes that were found to be upregulated in previous experiments did not reach  0.05 in our LC‐MSE analysis; ppiB (2.1 fold, = 0.026), fbpA (1.3 fold, = 0.058), prx (1.2 fold, = 0.39), and NMB0865 (1.8 fold, = 0.44). Similarly, cysK was found to be significantly downregulated in two previous independent SDS/PAGE/MS and microarray experiments and was stably expressed at = 0.48 in our LC‐MSE dataset (Table S1). The wt expression of ppiB, fbpA, and prx showed a relatively high variation that resulted in an insignificant statistical level. The conflicting results of NMB0865 and cysK could be explained by regulatory differences between N. meningitidis strains H44/76 and MC58. Five antigenic or phase variable genes (fixP, pilE, pilS, omp85, tspA) were found to be inversely regulated when comparing LC‐MSE results with those from the other experiments. Finally, NMB2091 which is included in the novel 4CMenB vaccine 29, is downregulated in our LC‐MSE experiment while previously it was detected as upregulated in our laboratory using SDS/PAGE/MS utilizing the same strain 13. This might suggest variable adaptions to altered OMP assembly in the Δhfq strain as described below.

Validity of LC‐MSE analysis in analyzing the Hfq regulon in N. meningitidis

LC‐MSE is a proteomic technique that has been used successfully in a variety of experiments where absolute quantitation of a complex mix of proteins was desired 21. Based on our results, it has shown to be highly reproducible and has extensively expanded the Hfq regulon in N. meningitidis on the level that is ultimately the most relevant for post‐transcriptional regulation, that is, the protein level.

A low correlation between proteomic and transcriptomic data has been reported in several studies, including those involving pathogenic Neisseria spp. 17, 18, 55. However, 13 of the top 15 upregulated proteins (87%) detected by LC‐MSE were corroborated independently by analyses performed by other groups. The remaining two proteins that were detected by LC‐MSE but not microarray analysis will be further discussed below. One protein, PrpF, for which no mRNA transcript was detected by microarray is most likely regulated in convergence with the other proteins in the large genomic island responsible for utilization of propionic acid 48. These are among the highest upregulated genes in both LC‐MSE and microarray experiments. The other protein, NMB1381 (annotated as the iron‐binding protein IscA in other meningococcal genomes) has a role in iron–sulfur cluster biogenesis and is part of a group of related proteins that are significantly upregulated (see below). One of the major modes of activity of Hfq in conjunction with sRNAs is the inhibition of translation by sequestering the ribosome‐binding site (RBS) of mRNAs 7. mRNAs that are prevented from entry by the ribosome but not (completely) degraded may still be detected using oligomer microarray approaches (and short read length transcriptome sequencing) but protein products will be absent and therefore not detected by proteomic techniques like LC‐MSE.

Intriguingly, the majority of the downregulated proteins detected by LC‐MSE were not detected by microarray. Using LC‐MSE, most of these proteins were detected in three or more biological replicates of the wt condition but not in any of the three biological replicates of the hfq deletion mutant. We have chosen a conservative approach for detecting downregulated proteins by setting all nondetected proteins just below the detection limit of 0.11 and a rigorous FDR control with result that most of the downregulated proteins were not significantly different in expression between the wt and the hfq deletion mutant. There were no discrepancies between those downregulated genes detected in the two microarray experiments and those detected by LC‐MSE.

Comparison with previously characterized sRNAs in N. meningitidis

Currently, only a limited number from a myriad of detected putative sRNAs in N. meningitidis have been further characterized. A small antisense RNA (AS RNA) cis‐encoded on the pilE locus modulates pilin variation 56. Its Hfq dependence is unclear, in our Δhfq strain pilE expression is highly variable, quantified at the same or at almost half of wt levels. This is in contrast to the increased expression seen in MC58 12, 14 but may be explained by phase variation in this locus encoding antigenically variable proteins. The ferric uptake regulator (Fur)‐regulated sRNA NrrF downregulates the sdhCDAB regulon during iron starvation 11, 15, 57. This regulation has been shown to be independent of Hfq and accordingly sdhA was found to be stably expressed in our LC‐MSE data. The FNR regulated and anaerobically induced sRNA AniS has been shown to downregulate the genes NMB0214 (encoding PrlC, an oligopeptidase A) and NMB1468 (encoding an immunogenic surface exposed lipoprotein 30) in an Hfq‐dependent fashion 12. Ultimate validation of direct targeting of NMB1468 by AniS was shown using a green fluorescent protein‐based plasmid system in a heterologous Escherichia coli background 58, 59. Neither gene was detected by microarray or SDS/PAGE/MS screens of Hfq‐regulated proteins. Furthermore, as NMB1468 was not detected in several proteomic experiments in N. meningitidis, it was considered to be present at low levels or inefficiently extracted 30. In our LC‐MSE data, NMB0214 was significantly upregulated 1.7‐fold (= 0.0031) and NMB1468 was found to be highly expressed and upregulated 1.4‐fold (= 0.026). This highlights the sensitivity of LC‐MSE to detect subtle but biologically relevant differential regulation even in proteins that are difficult to detect by traditional SDS/PAGE/MS. Finally, sRNA Bns1 was detected in N. meningitidis strain MC58 from ex vivo glucose‐rich human blood 60 and was subsequently confirmed to be glucose inducible 47. Indirect proof that Bns1 positively regulates NMB0429, which is part of the NMB0432‐PrpB‐PrpC operon, was provided by microarray analysis and in silico target prediction, possibly by stabilizing their mRNAs 61. Indeed, a MC58Δbns1 strain shows downregulation of this operon. The prp gene cluster NMB0430‐NMB0435 was identified as a large genomic island allowing the meningococcus to utilize propionic acid 48. In our study, PrpB, PrpC, PrpF, AckA‐1, and NMB0432 are highly upregulated in the Δhfq background. These results seem to be in contrast with the results obtained with the MC58Δbns1 strain. The involvement of Hfq in the upregulation of the NMB0429‐NMB0430 operon, which still needs experimental confirmation, might be complex.

The Hfq regulon of N. meningitidis

Hfq has been studied extensively, particularly in Enterobacteriaceae 6, 7, 10, 62. Its central role in facilitating metabolic and structural adaptations in response to environmental factors results in dramatically altered phenotypes in deletion mutants. The alterations observed with LC‐MSE proteomics in the hfq knockout vs. the wt reflect the attempt of the bacterium to adapt and grow utilizing pathways and available metabolites. In conjunction with its cellular nucleotide and protein partners, Hfq allows for both up‐ and downregulating post‐transcriptional effects. The resulting proteome will reflect the highly complex effects of abrogating Hfq. These effects comprise both the result of direct interaction between Hfq and its sRNA and mRNA targets and the indirect effects that Hfq might have in interaction with sRNAs targeting mRNAs that code for regulators. However, several consistent trends can be discovered in the current and previously reported experiments that will be discussed in the following paragraphs.

As shown before 13, the hfq deletion mutant of N. meningitidis demonstrates a severely hampered growth rate. The results of this proteomic study provide a plausible explanation showing highly downregulated genes involved in nucleotide synthesis, DNA replication, cell division, lipopolysaccharides (LPS), and peptidoglycan synthesis, membrane components, protein biosynthesis, protein folding, amino acid metabolism, fatty acid metabolism, and cofactor and vitamin metabolism. Furthermore, many proteins involved in releasing energy using oxidative phosphorylation (ATP synthesis coupled with the electron transport chain) are downregulated.

The growth retardation and downregulation of structural proteins can be the consequence of the reduced ability of the meningococcus to respire and generate energy. Hfq may also be directly associated with the synthesis of, for example, membrane components, which has been speculated for LpxD (involved in LPS lipid‐A synthesis) 10. In E. coli the deletion of hfq causes the activation of the σE and Cpx cell envelope stress responses that are caused by deregulation of OMPs 63. Several OMPs and their associated proteins involved in biogenesis and folding, are downregulated in Δhfq (e.g., ComL, fHbp, GNA2091/YrAP 29, SurA, and FkpA) while others are stably expressed (PorB and RmpM). This suggests specific Hfq‐associated regulation of outer membrane biogenesis in N. meningitidis. The σE‐regulon in N. meningitidis is surprisingly small 52 and a homolog of Cpx is lacking, contrary to E. coli. This represents an example where Hfq regulation in N. meningitidis and the gram‐negative model organism E. coli are similar but different.

Interestingly, in Δhfq six of the seven proteins involved in propionate metabolism ending in succinate, pyruvate, and oxaloacetate (NMB0432, AckA‐1, PrpC, PrpF, AcnB, and PrpB) and four of the five proteins involved in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle converting malate to α‐ketoglutarate (YojH, GltA, AcnB, and Icd) are among the highest upregulated genes. Crucially, aconitate hydratase B (AcnB) plays a dual role in catalyzing both the reaction 2‐methyl‐cis‐aconitate ↔ 2‐methylisocitrate of the methylcitrate cycle and the reaction cis‐aconitate ↔ isocitrate of the TCA cycle. Proteins involved in the Entner–Doudoroff pathway, the preferred glucose breakdown route in N. meningitidis, show downregulation ( 0.05) indicating a shift away from glucose catabolism 64. The lactate permease LctP that transports extracellular lactate into the cytosol is downregulated, impairing the use of lactate as a carbon source. This has profound effects on the ability of N. meningitidis to grow both in vitro 65 and in vivo 49, 66, 67, and in colonizing the nasopharynx 68 and immune evasion 69, 70.

In the pentose phosphate pathway, only glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase encoded by zwf is significantly downregulated and together with Glp catalyze the unidirectional oxidation of glucose 6‐phosphate (G6P) to 6‐phosphogluconolactone (6PG). Zwf shares a similar evolutionary origin and enzymatic mechanism with the 3‐hydroxyisobutyrate dehydrogenase MmsB as they are part of the 3‐hydroxyacid dehydrogenase family 71. NMB1584 in N. meningitidis encodes a putative 3‐hydroxyisobutyrate dehydrogenase similar to MmsB and shows the highest upregulated fold change in our LC‐MSE experiment. Its function in the meningococcus is not characterized but in other bacteria MmsB has been shown to generate energy by catabolizing amino acids 72. This suggests the existence of an Hfq‐dependent mechanism influencing NMB1584 mRNA expression and regulating catabolism of amino acids for alternative energy when needed in nutrient‐poor environments.

In the partially functioning Embden Meyerhof Parnas pathway fructose bisphosphatase (fbp) is highly downregulated while glycolytic glucose‐6‐phosphate isomerase pgi‐1 is highly upregulated. In the gram‐negative model organisms E. coli and Salmonella enterica, intracellular glucose levels are strictly controlled and glucose homeostasis is subject to complex transcriptional and post‐transcriptional control 73. Examples include the prevention of phosphosugar stress and the control of amino sugar biosynthesis 74. Genes involved in these pathways show dramatic alterations upon the deletion of hfq from the Neisserial chromosome.

The utilization of propionic acid in the adult nasopharynx has been proposed to provide the meningococcus with a selective advantage. In this ecological niche many anaerobes produce propionate as the end‐product of fermentation. This provides a carbon source the meningococcus can use for growth 48. The end products of the methyl‐citrate cycle, succinate, pyruvate, and oxaloacetate, feed directly into the TCA cycle where the oxidation of acetyl‐CoA is highly upregulated. The active import of extracellular propionate and activation of the methyl‐citrate cycle are either the consequences of deregulation of the genes involved in this pathway (e.g., through Bns1 or an undiscovered other sRNA) or the more indirect result of the meningococcus opting for propionic acid as a carbon source following the inability to utilize other carbon sources. Furthermore, the upregulation of genes involved in a specific part of the TCA cycle is striking and perhaps indicative of a direct effect of the loss of Hfq‐dependent function of a sRNA.

The highly upregulated genes involved in propionic acid metabolism and the TCA cycle causes high levels of α‐ketoglutarate resulting in a dampening effect on GdhA (−1.8 fold, = 0.014) 75, which is involved in α‐ketoglutarate l‐glutamate interconversion. This could explain the strongly downregulated genes involved in the import and biosynthesis of l‐glutamate (gltT and putA, respectively), as l‐glutamate is not siphoned off into the TCA cycle by GdhA. Its conversion into glutathione, however, is limited by the availability of cysteine (see below).

Other clusters of upregulated genes are those involved in iron–sulfur biosynthesis (iscR, iscA, iscS, fdx‐1/2, nifU/iscU, cyaY) and iron storage (bfrA and bfrB). The genes coupled with the upregulation of oxidoreductases SodB and SodC resemble a response of the meningococcus to abundant iron conditions and oxidative stress. Surprisingly in this context, the proteins CysK and CysT which are involved in acquiring extracellular H2S and SO4 2− required for cysteine synthesis, are downregulated. This might lead to cysteine depletion which causes oxidative stress and impairs iron–sulfur protein assembly 76.

The sRNA RyhB in E. coli has been shown to regulate sodB and the iscRSUA polycistronic mRNA by targeting it for degradation by RNase E under iron limitation conditions 77. Genes that are upregulated in iron‐deprived conditions, including Fur, are stably expressed in the absence of Hfq when the bacterium is growing with abundant iron 17, 18, 78. It has been proposed that in N. meningitidis, similar to other bacteria, intracellular iron homeostasis is the target of tight post‐transcription control 77. To date, the only sRNA found to be regulated by Fur in N. meningitidis is NrrF 57. Its regulating abilities has been found to be limited thus far, leaving room for additional sRNA regulators to be involved in iron homeostasis in this bacterium.

Neisseria meningitidis expresses a Zinc uptake regulator (Zur) that represses proteins involved in zinc uptake such as ZnuD 79. NMB0546 (the zinc‐containing alcohol dehydrogenase AdhP) is known to be downregulated under conditions of zinc limitation, while NMB0317 (NADPH‐dependent 7‐cyano‐7‐deazaguanine reductase QueF, involved in queuosine biosynthesis) is downregulated when zinc is abundant. Both genes are upregulated in the hfq deletion mutant strain. Therefore, the interplay of Hfq, Zur, and possible sRNA intermediates might have activating and repressing effects.

Bacterial ribosomes are traditionally seen as homogeneous entities that consist of the same set of ribosomal proteins and rRNA molecules to accomplish protein synthesis. However, evidence for subpopulations of heterogeneous and functionally specialized ribosomes that react to environmental stimuli has emerged 80. Furthermore, a large body of cis‐ and trans‐oriented noncoding RNA candidates associated with ribosomal protein operons have been identified, of which several trans‐acting sRNAs were differentially regulated by Hfq 81. In our study, five ribosomal proteins and the putative 23S rRNA methyltransferase NMB0475 were upregulated while another five ribosomal proteins and the ribosomal maturation factor RimP are downregulated. Interestingly, all five ribosomal proteins that are upregulated and one of the downregulated ribosomal proteins have been shown to interact with Hfq in E. coli 10, 82. As the majority of proteins of fully assembled ribosomes are readily exchangeable 83 the specialization of the translational machinery could potentially be completely modulated by ribo‐regulation facilitated by Hfq.

Conclusions

The analysis and validation of the Hfq regulon in N. meningitidis has given further insight into its profound regulatory effects. In conjunction with previous studies, a comprehensive network of Hfq‐regulated proteins was constructed and differentially expressed proteins were found to be involved in a large variety of cellular processes. Potential gaps in the Hfq‐dependent sRNA repertoire in the meningococcus were identified in either the direct or indirect regulation of OMPs, the methyl‐citrate and TCA cycles, iron and zinc homeostasis, and the assembly of ribosomal proteins. Possible analogs in more canonical gram‐negative Enterobacteriaceae have been described but further research is needed to identify and characterize these sRNAs in N. meningitidis.

Data accessibility

Raw output data from the ProteinLynxGlobalServer analysis program, encompassing all precursor, fragment, peptide, and protein data extracted from the raw files by the algorithm. This data is located at figshare.com: https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5001854 [Correction added after online publication on 5 June 2017: figshare data information updated].

Author contributions

RHV, AvdE, DS, and YP conceived and designed the project. RHV and GK acquired the data. RHV, GK, AvdE, DS, and YP analyzed and interpreted the data. RHV wrote the original draft and GK, AvdE, DS, and YP contributed to the final manuscript.

Supporting information

Fig. S1. Relative abundance of proteins of wt and hfq deletion mutant strains.

Fig. S2. Replicate analysis plots.

Fig. S3. Volcano plots.

Fig. S4. Protein comparisons between and within biological replicates of wt and hfq deletion mutant strains.

Fig. S5. Schematic representation of metabolic pathways influenced by Hfq.

Table S1. Extended results of LC‐MSE experiments.

Data S1. Supplementary materials.

References

  • 1. Bijlsma MW, Brouwer MC, Kasanmoentalib ES, Kloek AT, Lucas MJ, Tanck MW, van der Ende A and van de Beek D (2016) Community‐acquired bacterial meningitis in adults in the Netherlands, 2006‐14: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 16, 339–347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Stephens DS, Greenwood B and Brandtzaeg P (2007) Epidemic meningitis, meningococcaemia, and Neisseria meningitidis . Lancet 369, 2196–2210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Papenfort K and Vanderpool CK (2015) Target activation by regulatory RNAs in bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 39, 362–378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Miyakoshi M, Chao Y and Vogel J (2015) Regulatory small RNAs from the 3′ regions of bacterial mRNAs. Curr Opin Microbiol 24, 132–139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Storz G, Vogel J and Wassarman KM (2011) Regulation by small RNAs in bacteria: expanding frontiers. Mol Cell 43, 880–891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Updegrove TB, Zhang A and Storz G (2016) Hfq: the flexible RNA matchmaker. Curr Opin Microbiol 30, 133–138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Vogel J and Luisi BF (2011) Hfq and its constellation of RNA. Nat Rev Microbiol 9, 578–589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Wagner EG (2013) Cycling of RNAs on Hfq. RNA Biol 10, 619–626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Babski J, Maier LK, Heyer R, Jaschinski K, Prasse D, Jager D, Randau L, Schmitz RA, Marchfelder A and Soppa J (2014) Small regulatory RNAs in Archaea. RNA Biol 11, 484–493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Sobrero P and Valverde C (2012) The bacterial protein Hfq: much more than a mere RNA‐binding factor. Crit Rev Microbiol 38, 276–299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Mellin JR, McClure R, Lopez D, Green O, Reinhard B and Genco C (2010) Role of Hfq in iron‐dependent and ‐independent gene regulation in Neisseria meningitidis . Microbiology 156 (Pt 8), 2316–2326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Fantappie L, Oriente F, Muzzi A, Serruto D, Scarlato V and Delany I (2011) A novel Hfq‐dependent sRNA that is under FNR control and is synthesized in oxygen limitation in Neisseria meningitidis . Mol Microbiol 80, 507–523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Pannekoek Y, Huis in ‘t Veld RAG, Hopman CT, Langerak AA, Speijer D and van der Ende A (2009) Molecular characterization and identification of proteins regulated by Hfq in Neisseria meningitidis . FEMS Microbiol Lett 294, 216–224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Fantappié L, Metruccio MM, Seib KL, Oriente F, Cartocci E, Ferlicca F, Giuliani MM, Scarlato V and Delany I (2009) The RNA chaperone Hfq is involved in stress response and virulence in Neisseria meningitidis and is a pleiotropic regulator of protein expression. Infect Immun 77, 1842–1853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Metruccio MM, Fantappie L, Serruto D, Muzzi A, Roncarati D, Donati C, Scarlato V and Delany I (2009) The Hfq‐dependent small noncoding RNA NrrF directly mediates Fur‐dependent positive regulation of succinate dehydrogenase in Neisseria meningitidis . J Bacteriol 191, 1330–1342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Gevaert K, Van Damme P, Ghesquiere B, Impens F, Martens L, Helsens K and Vandekerckhove J (2007) A la carte proteomics with an emphasis on gel‐free techniques. Proteomics 7, 2698–2718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. van Ulsen P, Kuhn K, Prinz T, Legner H, Schmid P, Baumann C and Tommassen J (2009) Identification of proteins of Neisseria meningitidis induced under iron‐limiting conditions using the isobaric tandem mass tag (TMT) labeling approach. Proteomics 9, 1771–1781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Basler M, Linhartova I, Halada P, Novotna J, Bezouskova S, Osicka R, Weiser J, Vohradsky J and Sebo P (2006) The iron‐regulated transcriptome and proteome of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup C. Proteomics 6, 6194–6206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Bernardini G, Braconi D and Santucci A (2007) The analysis of Neisseria meningitidis proteomes: reference maps and their applications. Proteomics 7, 2933–2946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Silva JC, Gorenstein MV, Li GZ, Vissers JP and Geromanos SJ (2006) Absolute quantification of proteins by LCMSE: a virtue of parallel MS acquisition. Mol Cell Proteomics 5, 144–156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Kramer G, Woolerton Y, van Straalen JP, Vissers JP, Dekker N, Langridge JI, Beynon RJ, Speijer D, Sturk A and Aerts JM (2015) Accuracy and reproducibility in quantification of plasma protein concentrations by mass spectrometry without the use of isotopic standards. PLoS One 10, e0140097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Kramer G, Moerland PD, Jeeninga RE, Vlietstra WJ, Ringrose JH, Byrman C, Berkhout B and Speijer D (2012) Proteomic analysis of HIV‐T cell interaction: an update. Front Microbiol 3, 240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Piet JR, Huis in ‘t Veld RAG, van Schaik BD, van Kampen AH, Baas F, van de Beek D, Pannekoek Y and van der Ende A (2011) Genome sequence of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B strain H44/76. J Bacteriol 193, 2371–2372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. van Passel M, Bart A, Pannekoek Y and van der Ende A (2004) Phylogenetic validation of horizontal gene transfer? Nat Genet 36, 1028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. McLoughlin F, Arisz SA, Dekker HL, Kramer G, de Koster CG, Haring MA, Munnik T and Testerink C (2013) Identification of novel candidate phosphatidic acid‐binding proteins involved in the salt‐stress response of Arabidopsis thaliana roots. Biochem J 450, 573–581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Benjamini Y and Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate – a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Methodol 57, 289–300. [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Reiner A, Yekutieli D and Benjamini Y (2003) Identifying differentially expressed genes using false discovery rate controlling procedures. Bioinformatics 19, 368–375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Tettelin H, Saunders NJ, Heidelberg J, Jeffries AC, Nelson KE, Eisen JA, Ketchum KA, Hood DW, Peden JF and Dodson RJ (2000) Complete genome sequence of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B strain MC58. Science 287, 1809–1815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Bos MP, Grijpstra J, Tommassen‐vanBoxtel R and Tommassen J (2014) Involvement of Neisseria meningitidis lipoprotein GNA2091 in the assembly of a subset of outer membrane proteins. J Biol Chem 289, 15602–15610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Hsu CA, Lin WR, Li JC, Liu YL, Tseng YT, Chang CM, Lee YS and Yang CY (2008) Immunoproteomic identification of the hypothetical protein NMB1468 as a novel lipoprotein ubiquitous in Neisseria meningitidis with vaccine potential. Proteomics 8, 2115–2125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Marteyn BS, Karimova G, Fenton AK, Gazi AD, West N, Touqui L, Prevost MC, Betton JM, Poyraz O, Ladant D et al (2014) ZapE is a novel cell division protein interacting with FtsZ and modulating the Z‐ring dynamics. MBio 5, e00022–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Madico G, Welsch JA, Lewis LA, McNaughton A, Perlman DH, Costello CE, Ngampasutadol J, Vogel U, Granoff DM and Ram S (2006) The meningococcal vaccine candidate GNA1870 binds the complement regulatory protein factor H and enhances serum resistance. J Immunol 177, 501–510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Tunio SA, Oldfield NJ, Ala'Aldeen DA, Wooldridge KG and Turner DP (2010) The role of glyceraldehyde 3‐phosphate dehydrogenase (GapA‐1) in Neisseria meningitidis adherence to human cells. BMC Microbiol 10, 280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Skaar EP, Lecuyer B, Lenich AG, Lazio MP, Perkins‐Balding D, Seifert HS and Karls AC (2005) Analysis of the Piv recombinase‐related gene family of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Bacteriol 187, 1276–1286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Yang X, Wu Z, Wang X, Yang C, Xu H and Shen Y (2009) Crystal structure of lipoprotein GNA1946 from Neisseria meningitidis . J Struct Biol 168, 437–443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Monaco C, Tala A, Spinosa MR, Progida C, De Nitto E, Gaballo A, Bruni CB, Bucci C and Alifano P (2006) Identification of a meningococcal L‐glutamate ABC transporter operon essential for growth in low‐sodium environments. Infect Immun 74, 1725–1740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW and Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215, 403–410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Martin P, van de Ven T, Mouchel N, Jeffries AC, Hood DW and Moxon ER (2003) Experimentally revised repertoire of putative contingency loci in Neisseria meningitidis strain MC58: evidence for a novel mechanism of phase variation. Mol Microbiol 50, 245–257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Saunders NJ, Jeffries AC, Peden JF, Hood DW, Tettelin H, Rappuoli R and Moxon ER (2000) Repeat‐associated phase variable genes in the complete genome sequence of Neisseria meningitidis strain MC58. Mol Microbiol 37, 207–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Cahoon LA and Seifert HS (2011) Focusing homologous recombination: pilin antigenic variation in the pathogenic Neisseria. Mol Microbiol 81, 1136–1143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Anderson MT and Seifert HS (2013) Phase variation leads to the misidentification of a Neisseria gonorrhoeae virulence gene. PLoS One 8, e72183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Furumichi M and Tanabe M (2016) KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 44 (D1), D457–D462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. UniProt C (2015) UniProt: a hub for protein information. Nucleic Acids Res 43 (Database issue), D204–D212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Baart GJ, Zomer B, de Haan A, van der Pol LA, Beuvery EC, Tramper J and Martens DE (2007) Modeling Neisseria meningitidis metabolism: from genome to metabolic fluxes. Genome Biol 8, R136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Baart GJ, Langenhof M, van de Waterbeemd B, Hamstra HJ, Zomer B, van der Pol LA, Beuvery EC, Tramper J and Martens DE (2010) Expression of phosphofructokinase in Neisseria meningitidis . Microbiology 156 (Pt 2), 530–542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Schoen C, Kischkies L, Elias J and Ampattu BJ (2014) Metabolism and virulence in Neisseria meningitidis . Front Cell Infect Microbiol 4, 114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Fagnocchi L, Bottini S, Golfieri G, Fantappie L, Ferlicca F, Antunes A, Guadagnuolo S, Del Tordello E, Siena E, Serruto D et al (2015) Global transcriptome analysis reveals small RNAs affecting Neisseria meningitidis bacteremia. PLoS One 10, e0126325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Catenazzi MC, Jones H, Wallace I, Clifton J, Chong JP, Jackson MA, Macdonald S, Edwards J and Moir JW (2014) A large genomic island allows Neisseria meningitidis to utilize propionic acid, with implications for colonization of the human nasopharynx. Mol Microbiol 93, 346–355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Mendum TA, Newcombe J, Mannan AA, Kierzek AM and McFadden J (2011) Interrogation of global mutagenesis data with a genome scale model of Neisseria meningitidis to assess gene fitness in vitro and in sera. Genome Biol 12, R127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Hebeler BH and Morse SA (1976) Physiology and metabolism of pathogenic Neisseria: tricarboxylic acid cycle activity in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Bacteriol 128, 192–201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Rusniok C, Vallenet D, Floquet S, Ewles H, Mouze‐Soulama C, Brown D, Lajus A, Buchrieser C, Medigue C and Glaser P (2009) NeMeSys: a biological resource for narrowing the gap between sequence and function in the human pathogen Neisseria meningitidis . Genome Biol 10, R110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Huis in ‘t Veld RAG, Willemsen AM, van Kampen AH, Bradley EJ, Baas F, Pannekoek Y and van der Ende A (2011) Deep sequencing whole transcriptome exploration of the sigmaE regulon in Neisseria meningitidis . PLoS One 6, e29002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Maharjan S, Saleem M, Feavers IM, Wheeler JX, Care R and Derrick JP (2015) Dissection of the function of the RmpM periplasmic protein from Neisseria meningitidis . Microbiology 162, 364–375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Hey A, Li MS, Hudson MJ, Langford PR and Kroll JS (2013) Transcriptional profiling of Neisseria meningitidis interacting with human epithelial cells in a long‐term in vitro colonization model. Infect Immun 81, 4149–4159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Hegde PS, White IR and Debouck C (2003) Interplay of transcriptomics and proteomics. Curr Opin Biotechnol 14, 647–651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Tan FY, Wormann ME, Loh E, Tang CM and Exley RM (2015) Characterization of a novel antisense RNA in the major pilin locus of Neisseria meningitidis influencing antigenic variation. J Bacteriol 197, 1757–1768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Mellin JR, Goswami S, Grogan S, Tjaden B and Genco CA (2007) A novel fur‐ and iron‐regulated small RNA, NrrF, is required for indirect fur‐mediated regulation of the sdhA and sdhC genes in Neisseria meningitidis . J Bacteriol 189, 3686–3694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Urban JH and Vogel J (2009) A green fluorescent protein (GFP)‐based plasmid system to study post‐transcriptional control of gene expression in vivo. Methods Mol Biol 540, 301–319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Urban JH and Vogel J (2007) Translational control and target recognition by Escherichia coli small RNAs in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res 35, 1018–1037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Del Tordello E, Bottini S, Muzzi A and Serruto D (2012) Analysis of the regulated transcriptome of Neisseria meningitidis in human blood using a tiling array. J Bacteriol 194, 6217–6232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Tjaden B (2008) TargetRNA: a tool for predicting targets of small RNA action in bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res 36 (Web Server issue), W109–W113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Franze de Fernandez MT, Hayward WS and August JT (1972) Bacterial proteins required for replication of phage Q ribonucleic acid. Pruification and properties of host factor I, a ribonucleic acid‐binding protein. J Biol Chem 247, 824–831. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Vogt SL and Raivio TL (2014) Hfq reduces envelope stress by controlling expression of envelope‐localized proteins and protein complexes in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 92, 681–697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Antunes A, Golfieri G, Ferlicca F, Giuliani MM, Scarlato V and Delany I (2015) HexR controls glucose‐responsive genes and central carbon metabolism in Neisseria meningitidis . J Bacteriol 198, 644–654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Smith H, Tang CM and Exley RM (2007) Effect of host lactate on gonococci and meningococci: new concepts on the role of metabolites in pathogenicity. Infect Immun 75, 4190–4198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Echenique‐Rivera H, Muzzi A, Del Tordello E, Seib KL, Francois P, Rappuoli R, Pizza M and Serruto D (2011) Transcriptome analysis of Neisseria meningitidis in human whole blood and mutagenesis studies identify virulence factors involved in blood survival. PLoS Pathog 7, e1002027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Hedman AK, Li MS, Langford PR and Kroll JS (2012) Transcriptional profiling of serogroup B Neisseria meningitidis growing in human blood: an approach to vaccine antigen discovery. PLoS One 7, e39718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Exley RM, Goodwin L, Mowe E, Shaw J, Smith H, Read RC and Tang CM (2005) Neisseria meningitidis lactate permease is required for nasopharyngeal colonization. Infect Immun 73, 5762–5766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Exley RM, Shaw J, Mowe E, Sun YH, West NP, Williamson M, Botto M, Smith H and Tang CM (2005) Available carbon source influences the resistance of Neisseria meningitidis against complement. J Exp Med 201, 1637–1645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Lo H, Tang CM and Exley RM (2009) Mechanisms of avoidance of host immunity by Neisseria meningitidis and its effect on vaccine development. Lancet Infect Dis 9, 418–427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Qian X, Song L and Ni Y (2014) Enhanced organic solvent tolerance of Escherichia coli by 3‐hydroxyacid dehydrogenase family genes. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 172, 3106–3115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Chowdhury EK, Akaishi Y, Nagata S and Misono H (2014) Cloning and Overexpression of the 3‐Hydroxyisobutyrate Dehydrogenase Gene fromPseudomonas putidaE23. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 67, 438–441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Papenfort K and Vogel J (2014) Small RNA functions in carbon metabolism and virulence of enteric pathogens. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 4, 91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Bobrovskyy M and Vanderpool CK (2013) Regulation of bacterial metabolism by small RNAs using diverse mechanisms. Annu Rev Genet 47, 209–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Pagliarulo C, Salvatore P, De Vitis LR, Colicchio R, Monaco C, Tredici M, Tala A, Bardaro M, Lavitola A, Bruni CB et al (2004) Regulation and differential expression of gdhA encoding NADP‐specific glutamate dehydrogenase in Neisseria meningitidis clinical isolates. Mol Microbiol 51, 1757–1772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. van de Waterbeemd B, Zomer G, van den IJssel J, van Keulen L, Eppink MH, van der Ley P and van der Pol LA (2013) Cysteine depletion causes oxidative stress and triggers outer membrane vesicle release by Neisseria meningitidis; implications for vaccine development. PLoS One 8, e54314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Salvail H and Masse E (2012) Regulating iron storage and metabolism with RNA: an overview of posttranscriptional controls of intracellular iron homeostasis. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 3, 26–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Delany I, Grifantini R, Bartolini E, Rappuoli R and Scarlato V (2006) Effect of Neisseria meningitidis fur mutations on global control of gene transcription. J Bacteriol 188, 2483–2492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Pawlik MC, Hubert K, Joseph B, Claus H, Schoen C and Vogel U (2012) The zinc‐responsive regulon of Neisseria meningitidis comprises 17 genes under control of a Zur element. J Bacteriol 194, 6594–6603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Byrgazov K, Vesper O and Moll I (2013) Ribosome heterogeneity: another level of complexity in bacterial translation regulation. Curr Opin Microbiol 16, 133–139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Khayrullina GA, Raabe CA, Hoe CH, Becker K, Reinhardt R, Tang TH, Rozhdestvensky TS and Kopylov AM (2012) Transcription analysis and small non‐protein coding RNAs associated with bacterial ribosomal protein operons. Curr Med Chem 19, 5187–5198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Butland G, Peregrin‐Alvarez JM, Li J, Yang W, Yang X, Canadien V, Starostine A, Richards D, Beattie B and Krogan N (2005) Interaction network containing conserved and essential protein complexes in Escherichia coli. Nature 433, 531–537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Pulk A, Liiv A, Peil L, Maivali U, Nierhaus K and Remme J (2010) Ribosome reactivation by replacement of damaged proteins. Mol Microbiol 75, 801–814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Fig. S1. Relative abundance of proteins of wt and hfq deletion mutant strains.

Fig. S2. Replicate analysis plots.

Fig. S3. Volcano plots.

Fig. S4. Protein comparisons between and within biological replicates of wt and hfq deletion mutant strains.

Fig. S5. Schematic representation of metabolic pathways influenced by Hfq.

Table S1. Extended results of LC‐MSE experiments.

Data S1. Supplementary materials.

Data Availability Statement

Raw output data from the ProteinLynxGlobalServer analysis program, encompassing all precursor, fragment, peptide, and protein data extracted from the raw files by the algorithm. This data is located at figshare.com: https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5001854 [Correction added after online publication on 5 June 2017: figshare data information updated].


Articles from FEBS Open Bio are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES