In Fig 5, panel B is a duplicate of the first image of panel A. Please see the correct Fig 5 and its caption below.
Fig 5. Probability of foraging site fidelity in relation to oceanographic parameters: (a) within a year and (b) between years.
Curves were fitted using the best logistic GLMM respectively, as shown in Table 5. The grey bar represents the 95% confidence interval around the estimated effect.
Reference
- 1.Arthur B, Hindell M, Bester M, Trathan P, Jonsen I, Staniland I, et al. (2015) Return Customers: Foraging Site Fidelity and the Effect of Environmental Variability in Wide-Ranging Antarctic Fur Seals. PLoS ONE 10(3): e0120888 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120888 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]