Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2017 May 25;11(5):e0005634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005634

Hookworm infection is associated with decreased CD4+ T cell counts in HIV-infected adult Ugandans

Bozena M Morawski 1,2,*, Miya Yunus 3, Emmanuel Kerukadho 4, Grace Turyasingura 5, Logose Barbra 3, Andrew Mijumbi Ojok 3, Andrew R DiNardo 6, Stefanie Sowinski 5,7, David R Boulware 1,2,#, Rojelio Mejia 8,#
Editor: Giovanna Raso9
PMCID: PMC5462474  PMID: 28542260

Abstract

Most studies evaluating epidemiologic relationships between helminths and HIV have been conducted in the pre-ART era, and evidence of the impact of helminth infections on HIV disease progression remains conflicting. Less is known about helminth infection and clinical outcomes in HIV-infected adults receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART). We sampled HIV-infected adults for eight gastrointestinal parasites and correlated parasitic infection with demographic predictors, and clinical and immunologic outcomes. Contrasting with previous studies, we measured parasitic infection with a quantitative, highly sensitive and specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. This cohort study enrolled HIV-infected Ugandans from August-September 2013 in Mbale, Uganda and collected stool and blood samples at enrollment. Real-time PCR quantified stool: Ascaris lumbricoides, Ancylostoma duodenale, Necator americanus, Strongyloides stercoralis, Trichuris trichiura, Cryptosporidium spp., Entamoeba histolytica, and Giardia intestinalis infection. Generalized linear models assessed relationships between parasitic infection and clinical or demographic data. 35% of participants (71/202) tested positive for ≥1 helminth, mainly N. americanus (55/199, 28%), and 4.5% (9/202) were infected with ≥2 stool parasites. Participants with hookworm infection had lower average CD4+ cell counts (-94 cells/mcL, 95%CI: -141, -48 cells/mcL; p<0.001) after adjustment for sex, CD4+ nadir at clinic entry, and time on ART. The high prevalence of parasitic infection and correlation with decreased CD4+ concentrations highlight the need to re-examine the effects of invasive helminth co-infection in rural, HIV-infected populations in the era of widely available ART. Elucidating the relationship between hookworm infection and immune recovery could provide opportunities for health optimization, e.g. integrated deworming, in these vulnerable populations.

Author summary

Intestinal parasites, diseases of poverty that infect low-income populations and decrease school attendance and earning potential, infect more than 1 billion people worldwide. Current international guidelines focus deworming campaigns on high-risk populations of preschool- and school-aged children, and women of childbearing age. Intestinal parasitic infections also overlap significantly with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), which is highly concentrated in Sub-Saharan Africa; and some research indicates that certain intestinal parasitic infections have contributed to the spread of HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa. While there is a significant body of research examining the intersection between intestinal parasites and HIV disease progression, most of this work has occurred before HIV therapy was widely available in the region. This is the first study, to our knowledge, that focuses on a mixed sex, HIV treatment-initiated adult population, and directly measures intestinal parasitic infection via highly sensitive and specific molecular techniques. The results of this study indicate that adults who are living with HIV and parasitic hookworm infection are at an immunologic disadvantage when compared to adults who are not infected with hookworm. Our results also suggest that integrating deworming medications into HIV care could be an effective way to maximize the health status of this vulnerable population.

Introduction

Five soil transmitted helminth species Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura, hookworm species Necator americanus and Ancylostoma duodenale, and Strongyloides stercoralis infect over a billion people worldwide.[1, 2] The burden of parasitic infection is greatest in low-income areas, particularly in certain areas of sub-Saharan Africa, where human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is also highly prevalent. Studies of African adults living with HIV have shown helminth co-infection rates that range from 10% to upwards of 45%.[39]

To date, the majority of research investigating the impact of intestinal helminth infection on HIV disease progression has occurred prior to widely available antiretroviral therapy (ART).[3, 4, 913] The effect of helminth and HIV co-infection in the presence of ART is less well characterized. Indeed, to our knowledge, only two studies to date have examined the impact of deworming on CD4+ recovery in persons receiving ART.[14, 15] The current literature examining the relationship between soil transmitted helminth infections and HIV in the pre-ART era presents an inconclusive picture. The large body of observational data is mixed. Two observational cohort studies found no beneficial effect of deworming on HIV viral loads and CD4+ T-cell concentrations,[4, 5] while another suggested the possibility of a protective effect of helminths on decreasing HIV viral replication.[3]

Of the three randomized experiments evaluating the impact of deworming on markers of HIV disease progression without ART, two found an improvement in either CD4+ T-cell concentrations or HIV viral load after anthelmintic therapy.[9, 13] Another larger, reflexive randomized deworming trial failed to show a statistically significant benefit of empiric deworming treatment versus standard of care in preventing HIV progression to either a CD4+ count of <350 cells/mcL, first reported use of antiretroviral treatment, or death due to a non-traumatic cause (44.0 versus 49.8 events per 100 person-years; hazard ratio = 0.88, 95%CI 0.74 to 1.04, P = 0.10).[10] However, it is possible that there was a less extreme benefit to presumptive therapy, which they were underpowered to detect.

Interactions between soil-transmitted helminths and their human hosts are complex, and helminth infection may influence a patient’s relationship with other pathogens. A recent review discusses not only the links between selected parasites and HIV susceptibility and disease progression, but also the relationship between soil transmitted helminths and the potential for increased susceptibility to malaria and tuberculosis.[1618] It is also important to recognize that soil transmitted helminths, through their potent and systemic T helper cell type 2 (Th2) cytokine and regulatory responses,[19] may induce Th2 protective effects that could benefit long-term HIV survivors, e.g. protection against conditions associated with chronic inflammation.[2023] However, this same Th2 immune response may mediate increased susceptibility for Th1-related infections.[24]

At present, integrated presumptive anthelmintic therapy in the context of HIV care is neither recommended by Ugandan National Guidelines,[25] nor is it recommended by WHO.[26] While WHO does recommend periodic so called “preventive chemotherapy” for high risk groups, including women of child bearing age and adults with occupational exposures,[27] these guidelines have generally not been integrated into any type of standard care, nor has particular emphasis been given to HIV-infection. Given the frequency and consistency with which HIV-diagnosed persons interact with their care providers, the integration of adult deworming programs into HIV care may be a logical conclusion.[28] However, given the dearth of high quality and adequately powered species-specific studies, dramatic increases in ART availability, and incomplete understanding of biological mechanisms that are impacted by helminths during HIV infection implies that research questions focused on soil transmitted helminths and HIV have not been exhausted.

Our current study evaluated the prevalence and burden of the five most common soil-transmitted helminths and three protozoal species in adults living with HIV enrolled in outpatient HIV care in peri-urban Uganda. We also evaluated the relationship between helminth infection and clinical and immunologic outcomes, and examined risk factors for helminth infection in this population.

Methods

Ethics statement

Written informed consent was provided by all participants. The University of Minnesota, The AIDS Support Organisation (TASO), and the Uganda National Council of Science and Technology institutional review boards approved this protocol.

Participant recruitment and data collection

From August through September 2013, we screened HIV-infected adults engaged in outpatient care at the TASO HIV clinic in Mbale, Uganda, during their normal clinical visit for a one-time stool sample analysis, and longitudinal follow-up via chart review. This study was powered to estimate overall parasitic infection prevalence among patients with a recent CD4+ T cell count <500 cells/mcL, a population of approximately 600. We estimated a sample size of 210, based on a true population prevalence of 30%, an alpha level of 0.05, 5% precision estimate, and a finite population size of 600.

Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 and most recent CD4+ count <500 cells/mcL. We excluded persons who reported or had a record of taking albendazole or other anthelmintics in the past three months, and persons with known albendazole allergy. Pregnant women were also excluded due to potential albendazole teratogenicity.

Participant data were collected via participant interview and chart review. We collected data on age, sex, weight, village of residence, and occupation. We also collected data on date of HIV diagnosis, date of enrollment into HIV care, World Health Organization (WHO) clinical stage at clinic enrollment, CD4+ at enrollment into clinical care (“nadir CD4+”), 12-month history of opportunistic infections, and ART history (regimen, duration) through review of medical records by a medical officer. Participants underwent a physical examination at study enrollment for assessment of current WHO clinical stage, weight, and presence of current opportunistic infections. Finally, we collected follow-up CD4+ T helper cell values that were gathered as part of TASO’s routine clinical practice in the 24 months since study enrollment. Study follow-up occurred in a passive fashion, and no attempts were made beyond standard clinical practice to return patients to care if they stopped attending clinic.

Biological sample collection and analyses

We collected blood and stool from participants during their study visit, which was also a participant’s normal clinic visit. We performed a single blood draw to evaluate CD4+ T cell count via the FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) per routine TASO laboratory protocol.

Parasitic infection status was only evaluated at one time-point: study enrollment. Participants provided a single stool sample, which we froze without fixatives on site at -20°C within 1–2 hours of collection. Stool specimens were transported on a weekly basis to Kampala, Uganda for long-term -80°C storage during enrollment. At the Translational Research Laboratory of the Infectious Diseases Institute in Kampala, Uganda, we used a modified version of a validated quantitative PCR described previously in Mejia et al. to assess participant stool for Ascaris lumbricoides, Ancylostoma duodenale, Necator americanus, Strongyloides stercoralis, Trichuris trichiura, Cryptosporidium spp., Entamoeba histolytica, and Giardia intestinalis infection.[29] This PCR assay was modified to increase the total volume of each reaction from 7μL to 10μL to accommodate the minimum settings on the Applied Biosystems 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System. Reagent concentrations of the 10μL reaction matched those of the 7μL reaction concentrations.[29]DNA was extracted from approximately 50mg of stool via the FastDNA SPIN Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA) using a low reagent method developed by Mejia et al. for resource-limited contexts, which has been included as S1 DNA Extraction Protocol. An additional step was required to extract T. trichiura DNA, whereby the remaining insoluble pellet from one DNA extraction was re-suspended in 200μL DNA-free water, heated at 90°C for 10 minutes, and centrifuged at 14,000g for 10 minutes. We then repeated the above-described DNA extraction method to process the resulting soluble portion of the sample.

Sequences for the species-specific primers and probes and methods for the qPCR analysis are found in Mejia et al.[29] All control standards were tested in triplicate, and all unknown samples were tested in duplicate. A PCR cycle threshold (Ct) value >38 was considered a negative result. To help ensure that false positives were not driving our results, we conducted a post hoc experiment to bind the N. americanus primers and probes to the pBR322 internal control plasmid.[30] We did not observe any evidence of binding between the N. americanus primers or probes and the pBR322 control plasmid.

Parasite burden quantification was performed by interpolating against parasite specific sequences standards and reported as DNA fg/μl.[29, 31] Briefly, egg counts were estimated from McMaster microscopy techniques of subjects infected with N. americanus and/or A. duodenale and compared directly to qPCR results. Estimated egg counts from qPCR were calculated using Yova/g feces = 0.03472*Xfg/μl per correlation studies.[31] Similar calculations were used to estimate Trichuris trichiura egg counts: Yova/g feces = (1.095 x 10−5)*Xfg/μl, which was derived by comparing qPCR to Kato-Katz results in infected individuals.[29]

Statistical analyses

Parasite infection prevalence was estimated overall, by species, and by species type (protozoa or nematoda). Infection intensity was summarized by species for helminth worms.[32, 33] Statistical analyses focused on hookworm infection a posteriori, due to its unique immunologic and clinical features, and overwhelming prevalence relative to other species of helminths. We used generalized linear models with a binomial distribution and log link, and a robust covariance estimator, to estimate associations between parasitic infection (overall helminth infection, hookworm infection only, and protozoa infection) and clinical and demographic characteristics, specifically occupation (farming as primary profession versus any other), sex, age (scaled to 5-year increments), weight (scaled to 5-kg increments), WHO Clinical Stage (3 or 4 versus 1 or 2), ART status (receiving or not receiving).

We also estimated the association between parasitic infection and CD4+ T cells/mcL at study enrollment, and the potential effect of parasitic infection on over CD4+ T cell concentrations over follow-up. Age-, and sex-adjusted linear regression models estimated the mean difference in CD4+ T cells/mcL at study enrollment by parasitic infection status (any protozoa, any helminth, hookworm only). Restricted maximum likelihood linear mixed models, which included participant-specific random intercepts, and an identity covariance matrix, evaluated change in CD4+ T cell concentrations over time across hookworm infection status among participants who were ART-initiated at baseline. These longitudinal models were adjusted for sex, age, time on ART, and weight at baseline. Additional exploratory sub-analyses of change in CD4+ T cell concentrations by hookworm infection status were performed among 1) participants who had initiated ART <1 year before enrollment, and 2) participants who had initiated ART for ≥1 year before enrollment. Time on ART, weight, sex, and age were a priori included as covariates given their relationship with either the outcome, or to control for potential confounding, e.g. age.

We attempted to evaluate the relationship between CD4+ T cell count and parasite burden (light, moderate, and heavy intensity infections per WHO classification). However, because all infections were classified as light intensity (<2,000 eggs/gram feces), we were unable to create any clinically meaningful exposures beyond presence or absence of hookworm infection. No imputation was performed for missing data, which occurred in <2% of participants. All analyses were performed in Stata/IC 13.1 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas) and results were evaluated against an alpha level of 0.05.

Results

We consented 216 HIV-infected adults during a routine clinic visit. Of these, 14 potential participants were unable to produce a stool sample on site, and were excluded from the study. Thus, 202 participants were enrolled (Table 1). Women comprised 69% of participants (139/202). The participants’ median age was 35 years [IQR: 30, 41]. The median overall CD4+ at study enrollment was 375 cells/mcL [IQR: 243, 450], and 90% (181/202) of participants were receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) for a median duration of 15 (IQR: 5, 29) months. All participants were receiving primary Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia prophylaxis with either trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (n = 201) or dapsone (n = 1).

Table 1. Baseline characteristics and demographic information by presence of stool helminth infection.

Characteristic No helminth infection Any helminth infection* P-value
N Median [IQR] or n (%) N Median [IQR] or n (%)
Age, years 140 35 [28, 40] 62 36 [30, 43] 0.16
Women 140 90 (64.3%) 62 49 (79.0%) 0.04
Weight, kg 136 53 [47, 60] 60 53 [48, 59] 0.83
CD4+ nadir at clinic entry, cells/mcL 135 257 [127, 401] 59 270 [117, 432] 0.50
CD4+ at study enrollment visit, cells/mcL 140 390 [280, 467] 62 319 [191, 415] <0.001
Currently receiving ART 140 129 (92.1%) 62 52 (83.9%) 0.08
Duration of ART, months** 129 15 [5, 28] 52 15 [4, 35] 0.84
Receiving tenofovir** 129 94 (72.9%) 52 33 (63.5%) 0.21
12-month pulmonary tuberculosis history 140 2 (1.4%) 62 1 (1.6%) 0.67
Self-reported farming occupation 139 87 (62.6%) 61 44 (72.1%) 0.19

*Ascaris lumbricoides, Ancylostoma duodenale, Necator americanus, Strongyloides stercoralis, Trichuris trichiura

**Among those participants currently receiving ART

Prevalence & burden

Multi-parallel quantitative PCR results indicated that 35.2% (71/202) of participants were infected with at least one species of helminth or protozoa. Of these 71 participants, 10 were infected with two species. Most parasitic infections were caused by N. americanus (27.6%, 55/199). Giardia had the next highest prevalence (6.1%, 12/197), followed by Strongyloides (4.0%, 8/202). Prevalence and infection intensity of parasitic organisms are described in Table 2.

Table 2. Stool parasite infection and burden by species.

N n (%) DNA (fg/μl) Median [IQR] Estimated eggs/g stool WHO Classification
Overall 202 71 (35.2%) N/A N/A
Helminths
Any helminth infection 202 62 (30.7%) N/A N/A N/A
Ascaris lumbricoides 189 0 (0%) N/A N/A N/A
Ancylostoma duodenale 200 1 (1%) 18.3 527 Light
Necator americanus 199 55 (27.6%) 0.025 [0.018, 0.22] 0.72 [0.53, 6.34] Light
Strongyloides stercoralis 202 8 (4.0%) 2.1 [<0.1, 81.0] N/A N/A
Trichuris trichiura 201 1 (0.5%) 0.6 52,694 Heavy
Protozoa
Any protozoa infection* 202 13 (6.4%) N/A N/A N/A
Cryptosporidium parvum/hominum 81 1 (1.2%) 35.9 [35.9, 35.9] N/A N/A
Entamoeba histolytica 201 3 (1.5%) <0.1 [<0.1, 0.3] N/A N/A
Giardia intestinalis 197 12 (6.1%) 14.7 [0.3, 205.5] N/A N/A

* Infection with either Entamoeba histolytica or Giardia intestinalis.

Calculated egg burdens for N. americanus infections had a median of 0.72 eggs per gram of stool (IQR: 0.53, 6.34; maximum: 275) and 527 eggs/gram of stool for the single Ancylostoma duodenale infection. These are considered light infections by the World Health Organization.[34] An estimated 52,694 eggs/gram of stool was calculated for the single heavy Trichuris trichiura infection. Strongyloides stercoralis eggs generally hatch and mostly larvae are seen in stool samples, there are no current categories for intensity of larvae in infected patients.

Factors associated with protozoal infection

Results of generalized linear models analyses indicated that each 5-year increase in age was inversely related with a composite outcome of either Giardia, Cryptosporidium, or E. histolytica infection (Prevalence Ratio (RR) = 0.71, 95%CI: 0.55, 0.92, p = 0.01); 11.5% (6/52) of participants <30 years of age, 6.7% (6/90) of participants 31 to 40 years of age, and 1.7% (1/60) of participants ≥40 years of age were infected with ≥1 protozoal species. Protozoal infection was more prevalent in farmers than other occupations, although this relationship was unstable and not statistically significant in an age- and sex-adjusted model (PR = 3.96; 95%CI: 0.89, 17.60; p = 0.07). Other factors–sex, CD4+ count at enrollment, ART status–were not associated with protozoa infection. (See Table 3)

Table 3. Demographic and clinical factors associated with parasitic infection.

Demographic or Clinical Characteristic n/N Prevalence Ratio
(95% CI)
n/N Prevalence Ratio
(95% CI)
n/N Prevalence Ratio
(95% CI)
Univariable analyses
Protozoa Helminths Hookworm spp.
Age, 5-year increments 202 0.70
(0.54, 0.91)
202 1.12
(0.97, 1.30)
198 1.19
(1.01, 1.39)
Women vs. Men 8/139 0.73
(0.25, 2.13)
49/139 1.71
(1.00, 2.92)
45/137 1.82
(1.01, 3.28)
5/63 13/63 11/61
Weight, 5-kg increments 196 0.94
(0.78, 1.13)
196 1.00
(0.90, 1.11)
192 0.99
(0.88, 1.10)
WHO Stage 3,4 vs. WHO Stage 1,2 2/25 1.24
(0.29, 5.27)
8/25 1.05
(0.56, 1.94)
6/24 0.87
(0.42, 1.81)
11/170 52/170 48/167
Currently receiving ART vs. ART-naïve 12/181 1.39
(0.19, 10.23)
52/181 0.60
(0.36, 1.00)
46/179 0.49
(0.30, 0.80)
1/21 10/21 10/19
Farming occupation vs. Any other occupation 11/131 2.90
(0.66, 12.75)
44/131 1.36
(0.84, 2.20)
40/130 1.35
(0.81, 2.27)
2/69 17/69 15/66
N Prevalence Ratio (95% CI) N Prevalence Ratio (95% CI) N Prevalence Ratio (95% CI)
Multivariable analyses
Protozoa Helminths Hookworm spp.
Age, 5 year increments* 202 0.71
(0.55, 0.92)
202 1.12
(0.97, 1.32)
198 1.20
(1.01, 1.42)
Women** 202 0.78
(0.27, 2.27)
202 1.71
(1.00, 2.91)
198 1.82
(1.10, 3.24)
Currently receiving ART*** 202 1.00
(0.11, 9.41)
202 0.66
(0.41, 1.07)
198 0.57
(0.36, 0.93)
Farming occupation*** 200 3.96
(0.89, 17.60)
200 1.28
(0.76, 2.14)
196 1.21
(0.68, 2.15)

* Sex-adjusted generalized linear model estimating prevalence ratios.

** Age-adjusted generalized linear model estimating prevalence ratios.

*** Age- and sex-adjusted generalized linear model estimating prevalence ratios.

Factors associated with helminth infection and hookworm infection

There were no statistically significant associations between demographic and clinical characteristics and any helminth infection, i.e. either A. lumbricoides, A. duodenale, N. americanus, S. stercoralis, or T. trichiura from univariable analyses. Adjusting sex and/or age in multivariable models did not change these results. There were no statistically significant relationships between age, sex, occupation and ART status and prevalent helminth infection. Helminth infection was slightly more prevalent in women (PR = 1.71; 95%CI: 1.00, 2.91) and less prevalent in people currently receiving ART (PR = 0.66; 95%CI: 0.41, 1.07), but neither were statistically significant. (Table 3.)

Prevalent infection with hookworm species A. duodenale or N. americanus was positively associated with age, and female sex in univariable analyses. Current receipt of ART was inversely associated with prevalent hookworm infection. These relationships were exaggerated in multivariable models that adjusted for sex and/or age. Increasing age (PR5-years = 1.20; 95%CI: 1.01, 1.42; p = 0.04) was associated with hookworm infection. Women were more likely to be infected with hookworm (PR = 1.82; 95%CI: 1.10, 3.24; p = 0.04), even after adjustment for age, versus male participants. Participants receiving ART were less likely to have prevalent hookworm infection (PR = 0.57; 95%CI: 0.36, 0.93; p = 0.02); 52.6% (10/19) of participants not receiving ART were infected with hookworm, and 25.7% (46/179) of participants receiving ART were infected with hookworm.

Relationship between hookworm and immune status

We assessed the relationship between hookworm infection and CD4+ T helper cell concentrations at study enrollment. Participants with hookworm infection demonstrated consistently lower concentrations of CD4+ cells/mcL when compared to hookworm-uninfected peers (Table 4). Unadjusted analyses indicated an average difference of -70 cells/mcL (95%CI: -113, -26, p = 0.002) in participants with hookworm infected relative to those without detectable hookworm infection. This relationship became more pronounced when adjusting for participant age, sex, and time on ART; participants with hookworm infection had 94 fewer CD4+ cells/mcL on average (95%CI -133, -55, p = <0.001) than those without hookworm. Stratified analyses on ART status (receiving or not currently receiving ART) indicate a similar relationship among those persons receiving ART at enrollment (n = 171) (mean: -102 cells/mcL; 95%CI -145, -58; p = <001). An additional stratified analysis among those persons who were ART naïve was limited by a small sample size (n = 19), but did not show a statistically significant relationship between hookworm infection and CD4+ T cell concentrations (mean: -43 cells/mcL; 95%CI: -118, 32; p = 0.24).

Table 4. Differences in CD4+ cells/mcL between parasite infected- and parasite-uninfected adults living with HIV in peri-urban Uganda.

N Mean difference in CD4+ cells/mcL (95% CI) a p-value
All participants
Protozoa
Protozoal infection, unadjusted 202 -11 (-96, 75) 0.81
Protozoal infection, adjusted b 194 -23 (-118, 71) 0.63
Helminth
Any helminth, unadjusted -62 (-107, -17) <0.01
Any helminth, adjusted c 194 -80 (-121, -39) <0.001
Hookworm
Hookworm infection, unadjusted 198 -70 (-113, -26) 0.002
Hookworm infection, adjusted c 190 -94 (-133, -55) <0.001
Among ART initiated only
Hookworm infection, adjusted c 171 -102 (-145, -58) <0.001
Among ART naïve only
Hookworm infection, adjusted d 19 -43 (-118, 32) 0.24

a Relative difference in CD4+ cells/mcL in those with hookworm infection, relative to those without hookworm infection.

b Adjusted for nadir CD4, age, sex

c Adjusted for nadir CD4, sex, years on ART

d Adjusted for nadir CD4, sex

Among participants who had initiated ART at enrollment, results from the longitudinal analyses demonstrate that participants with hookworm infection and participants without hookworm infection had a similar rate of CD4+ T cell immune recovery in the 24-months post-enrollment (βhookworm-time = 0.55; 95%CI: -0.35, 1.45; hookworm-time interaction term p-value = 0.23). Participants with hookworm did, however, have consistently lower CD4+ concentrations relative to their hookworm-uninfected peers over the 24 months of follow-up (-87 cells/mcL; 95%CI -151, -22; p = 0.009), based on an average of 2.4 CD4+ measurements (min = 1, max = 5) (Fig 1). The mean number of measurements over time across hookworm-infected versus uninfected participants was similar (2.2 and 2.4, respectively).

Fig 1. Change in CD4+ cells/mcL by hookworm infection status.

Fig 1

CD4+ cells/mcL from baseline through 24 months of follow-up among participants infected with hookworm, versus those without hookworm infection enrolled at The AIDS Support Organisation (TASO), Mbale, Uganda.

At 12 months post-enrollment, predicted means from sex-, age-, time on ART- and baseline weight-adjusted linear mixed models estimated that participants with hookworm infection had an average of 361 CD4+ cells/mcL (95%CI 310, 412) versus an average of 419 cells/mcL (95%CI 391, 448) amongst those without hookworm infection at baseline. Participants with hookworm infection at baseline had, on average, 58 fewer CD4+ cells/mcL (95%CI: -117, 1) relative to their uninfected peers at 12-months of follow-up. At 24 months post-enrollment, participants with hookworm had predicted mean 438 CD4+ cells/mcL (95%CI 365, 514) versus mean 469 cells/mcL (95%CI 429, 509) among those uninfected with hookworm at baseline. While participants with hookworm infection still had lower CD4+ cell concentrations than their uninfected peers at 24 months of follow-up, the difference in average CD4+ cells/mcL between hookworm infected versus uninfected across groups was attenuated (-30 cells/mcL; 95%CI -114, 55) and not statistically significant.

Furthermore, participants who had initiated ART ≥1 year prior to study enrollment (n = 108) demonstrated a similar relationship to our overall cohort; there was no difference in rate of CD4+ cell recovery during the study period, but those with hookworm were at an immunologic deficit relative to their uninfected peers (77 fewer CD4+ cells/mcL in those with hookworm versus those without; 95%CI -154, -1). Among persons who had initiated ART <1 year prior to study enrollment (n = 68), the effect was less pronounced, with only 26 (95%CI: -121, 70) fewer CD4 cells/mcL in those with hookworm versus those without, and no difference in change over time, like other analyses.

Discussion

We demonstrate that parasitic infection, particularly with N. americanus hookworm species, was common in this adult, HIV-infected population in Uganda. While these infections were generally light intensity infections, we report a clinically and statistically significant association between hookworm infection and decreased CD4+ T helper cells/mcL at study enrollment. This relationship was maintained over study follow-up, where participants with hookworm infection had diminished CD4+ immune status over time, relative to their peers who were not infected with hookworm. There was no difference, however, in CD4+ cell recovery over 24 months among participants who were ART-initiated at baseline.

To our knowledge, only two other studies to date have examined the health impacts of helminth infection in persons receiving ART, specifically the effects of deworming.[14, 15] In Uganda, Lankowski et al. did not find any significant beneficial effects of deworming in their overall study population. However, in a sub-group analysis of women only, they found that deworming with either albendazole or mebendazole 7 to 90 days prior to CD4+ T cell measurement, for unspecified parasitic infection increased CD4+ T helper cell concentrations by an average of 63 cells/mcL (95% CI: 6–120) in in the first year of ART initiation. This study was limited by the fact that a medical record of deworming was used as a proxy for helminth infection, and as such neither helminth infection prevalence nor deworming incidence were reliably captured. This may have attenuated their results towards a null finding in the overall cohort.

Ivan et al. found that deworming decreased HIV viral loads and increased CD4+ T cell concentrations over a 12-week period in a cohort of 980 HIV-infected, ART-initiated pregnant Rwandans.[15] While the results of this study demonstrate the value in revisiting the question of deworming in the presence of increasingly available ART, it is potentially limited by a treatment cross-over effect of deworming outside of the study setting. That said, any extra-study deworming in the control arm would likely attenuate the effects of their intervention; and one can extrapolate that the results in a completely controlled setting would have been more extreme. Additionally, this is a limited subset of the ART-receiving, HIV-infected population, and it would be important to duplicate these results in other populations of men and non-pregnant women.

Prevalence of parasitic infection

Our results are comparable with much of the available literature regarding parasite infection prevalence in adults. Other studies conducted in Uganda have found similar prevalences of hookworm infection (24 to 52%),[3539] and Strongyloides (4 to 8%) [4042] in adults with and without HIV. In persons with HIV in Nigeria, Senegal, and Ethiopia, Giardia prevalence has been observed at approximately 5%.[4345]

Partial immunity to most parasitic infections is acquired over the life course, leading to an increased rate of parasite destruction and worm expulsion with increasing age and re-infection. Hookworm species, however, do not induce the same adaptive immunity in humans as the other soil transmitted helminths, and consequently, may continue to infect adults with high frequency and intensity.[46] In the context of frequent and repeated infection, this lack of adaptive immunity may have important implications for host response to co-infections like HIV, and important Th1-moderated HIV co-morbidities, such as tuberculosis and cryptococcal meningitis.

Relationship between hookworm infection and CD4+ T cells/mcL

Our results found that participants who were infected with hookworm were at a significant CD4+ T-helper cells/mcL deficit, relative to participants who were not infected with hookworm. CD4+ T-helper cells are critical in mediation of the immune system’s response to various pathogens, and commonly used to monitor HIV disease progression and response to ART.[47] The inverse relationship between hookworm infection and CD4+ T cell concentrations was qualitatively and statistically consistent across various analyses, from unadjusted to adjusted regression, analyses restricted to persons receiving ART, and over time. We did not observe a difference in CD4+ cells/mcL among persons who were ART-naïve; however, the small proportion of persons not receiving ART in this cohort (n = 19) renders these analyses relatively uninformative.

Ample evidence demonstrates that soil-transmitted helminths are potent immunomodulators, and infection with soil-transmitted helminths involves many major body systems, from the gastrointestinal and circulatory systems, to soft tissues.[19] Multiple biologic mechanisms could be driving our observed relationship; and these results are likely multifactorial for any given participant. Hookworm infection in HIV-uninfected persons with celiac disease has been shown to decrease expression of interferon (IFN)-γ on intestinal T cells, and increase in CD4+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells, which could contribute to decreased differentiation to CD4+ T helper cells.[48] Other research has demonstrated that hookworm antigens induce cytotoxic and pro-apoptotic activity in Jurkat T Cells, contributing to an increase in CD4+, CD8+, and CD19+ lymphocytes that were in an early and/or late stage of programmed cell death.[49] Cuellar et al. found that commonly excreted hookworm protein Ac-TMP-1, a Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteases, induced murine splenic T cells to differentiate to CD4+ and CD8+CD25+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells that expressed interleukin (IL-)10 and suppressed naïve and activated CD4+ T cells differentiation.[50] Other human studies, however, have not found similar increases in T regulatory responses to hookworm infection.[51]

Other human studies have not found differences in CD4+ T cell concentrations between hookworm-infected and -uninfected groups of HIV-uninfected participants. In a quasi-experimental study by George et al., which measured the impact of deworming on microbial translocation (a contributor to chronic immune activation linked to decreased concentrations of CD4+ T helper cells), observed that hookworm was associated with elevated levels of pro-inflammatory markers, e.g. lipopolysaccharide, soluble CD14.[52] They did not, however, observe differences in T cell subsets among naturally infected, HIV-uninfected participants at baseline.[52] The authors postulate that lack of difference in T cell subsets is mediated by a counterbalancing, anti-inflammatory effect of hookworm infection, e.g. elevated levels of IL-10, and decreased C-reactive protein, IL-17 and haptoglobin.[52]

From the standpoint of clinical endpoints, results from clinical trials conducted in ART-naïve persons remain mixed. Results from the HEAT trial, which evaluated the impact of reflexive and repeated deworming on a patient’s risk for ART eligibility, i.e. a drop below 350 CD4+ cells/mcL, found no difference between the reflexive deworming group (400 mg albendazole every 3 months plus 25 mg/kg praziquantel annually) versus the standard of care group (no empiric deworming).[10] The trial had 80% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.775, which could be considered a large, albeit clinically important, difference in treatment groups. That said, actual CD4+ T cell concentrations at study completion were very similar across randomization groups, supporting the idea that deworming may not dampen CD4+ decline in the absence of ART. Other studies support this conclusion.[4, 5, 53] However, still other studies and meta-analyses demonstrated reductions in plasma viral loads and increases in CD4+ T helper cells with deworming in persons living with HIV.[13, 54] The differences in these results may in part be explained by differences in methodology, and in particular the need to pool species due to limited species-specific sample sizes.

Repeated and long-term exposure to hookworm and other helminth species may cause fibrosis of the gut associated lymphatic tissues (GALT). IL-13, in particular, is increased in the presence of hookworm infection[46] and a dominant mediator of fibrotic tissue, which induces fibrosis independently and via simulation and activation of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β. In the case of chronic and repeated helminth infections, and corresponding Th2 type immune responses, IL-13 production can become pathological. Fibrosis of the GALT has been linked to the dysregulation of immune cells, including CD4+ T cells, and impaired CD4+ recovery.[55, 56]

Chronic and repeated exposure to helminths and subsequent GALT fibrosis may have impacted the results of this and other studies. Indeed, the longitudinal analyses in this study demonstrate that hookworm-infected versus uninfected participants have a similar rate of CD4+ recovery over the 24-month follow-up period, but that those infected with hookworm remained at a significant immunologic deficit relative to their uninfected peers over time. Fibrosis is not reversible with deworming or other therapy. This bears mentioning because while hookworm and other helminths are still causally implicated in the decrease in CD4+ T cell concentrations, there are important implications for public health intervention design, e.g. increased deworming frequency targeting all stages of the human life course.

Limitations

It is possible that our results are spurious, either due to confounding, a misunderstanding of the directionality of the hookworm-CD4+ relationship, or a type I statistical error. The primary limitations of this study arise from its observational nature. First, the temporal relationship between parasite infection and immune status remains undetermined; it is conceivable that being immunocompromised would increase the likelihood of persistent infection. Research on this topic remains mixed and parasite dependent.[5760] However, most research to date suggests no difference in hookworm risk between immunocompromised and immunocompetent persons.[6164] There is potentially one exception to this pattern. A cross-sectional study by Sanyaolu et al. found that 4.6% (3/65) of HIV-infected Nigerians had hookworm infection, versus 1.8% (18/1015) of HIV-uninfected peers.[65] However, we were unable to duplicate their results based on the data provided in the paper. Our results are based on a single stool sample, and we did not use any concentration techniques prior to DNA extraction. Diagnostic sensitivity for hookworm–and other species–when evaluating a single stool sample is lower than sensitivity when using multiple stool samples. For example, Knopp et al. found that a single stool sample yielded a 7.1% prevalence, while 2 samples yielded a prevalence of 15.6% via Kato-Katz.[66] These authors found that Strongyloides prevalence with 1 stool sample versus 2 samples was similar, 3.5% and 5.3%, respectively. It is unlikely that our observed hookworm prevalence would have doubled had we analyzed >1 stool sample. However, we may have misclassified parasite-infected participants as uninfected, particularly among those with a low burden.

Finally, our results may be confounded by data that would have been useful in these analyses but were not available. Hookworm, and other intestinal parasites, are considered diseases of poverty. The relationship between increased infection incidence among economically disadvantaged persons is well established.[38, 6769] Additionally, being economically disadvantaged could have impacted health outcomes in this study, e.g. CD4+ T helper cells concentrations, as it has in other research.[7072] While we collected information on place of residence, this information could ultimately only be dichotomized into participants who lived in Mbale town, where the clinic is located, versus all others, which could represent varied levels of development and corresponding hookworm exposure. Also, ART adherence data were routinely collected and reflected uniformly high adherence levels. Past research on adherence at TASO ART clinics report similarly high levels of ART adherence, with ~90% of patients reporting no missed pills in the past 30 days.[7375] However, data from prior TASO adherence research–like adherence data for this study–are limited by the fact that they are self-reported, which consistently over-reports adherence relative to pill counts, pharmacy refill information, and/or drug concentrations in blood.[76, 77]

Conclusions

Despite the limitations of this study, we feel that these results are generalizable to other adults receiving outpatient HIV therapy in low-income, peri-urban areas. The results presented herein point to a high prevalence of helminth infection in this vulnerable population, and that hookworm infection is associated with sub-optimal health outcomes, i.e. lower CD4. Therefore, further examination of these questions via a randomized trial is warranted, especially how systematic deworming may impact the immune status of this vulnerable population in the presence of ART.

Supporting information

S1 STROBE

(DOCX)

S1 DNA Extraction Protocol

(DOCX)

S1 Data

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff at The AIDS Support Organisation in Mbale, the Translational Laboratory of the Infectious Diseases Institute, the Molecular Laboratory, particularly Lazarus Okoche, and Moses Joloba’s lab at Makerere University for assistance in the conduct of this study. We also thank Drs. Claudia Muñoz-Zanzi and Richard MacLehose at the University of Minnesota for their critical review of this manuscript.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by the J. B. Hawley Student Research Awards awarded through the University of Minnesota, School of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology and Community Health (to BMM), the University of Minnesota Doctoral Dissertation Fellowship (to BMM), the Lois and Richard King Distinguished Assistant Professorship (to DRB), and the Section of Pediatric Tropical Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine (to RM). Work on this manuscript was also supported by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Research Training Grant #R25 TW009345 funded by the Fogarty International Center (to BMM), the NIH Office of the Director of AIDS Research, the NIH Office of the Director of Research on Women’s Health, the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, the National Institute of Mental Health, the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, and awarded to the Northern Pacific Global Health Fellows Program by the Fogarty International Center. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Pullan RL, Smith JL, Jasrasaria R, Brooker SJ. Global numbers of infection and disease burden of soil transmitted helminth infections in 2010. Parasites & vectors. 2014;7:37. Epub 2014/01/23. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3905661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.McCarty TR, Turkeltaub JA, Hotez PJ. Global progress towards eliminating gastrointestinal helminth infections. Current opinion in gastroenterology. 2014;30(1):18–24. Epub 2013/11/19. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Elliott AM, Mawa PA, Joseph S, Namujju PB, Kizza M, Nakiyingi JS, et al. Associations between helminth infection and CD4+ T cell count, viral load and cytokine responses in HIV-1-infected Ugandan adults. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2003;97(1):103–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brown M, Kizza M, Watera C, Quigley MA, Rowland S, Hughes P, et al. Helminth infection is not associated with faster progression of HIV disease in coinfected adults in Uganda. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2004;190(10):1869–79. Epub 2004/10/23. doi: 10.1086/425042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Modjarrad K, Zulu I, Redden DT, Njobvu L, Lane HC, Bentwich Z, et al. Treatment of intestinal helminths does not reduce plasma concentrations of HIV-1 RNA in coinfected Zambian adults. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2005;192(7):1277–83. Epub 2005/09/02. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2730764. doi: 10.1086/444543 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bethony J, Brooker S, Albonico M, Geiger SM, Loukas A, Diemert D, et al. Soil-transmitted helminth infections: ascariasis, trichuriasis, and hookworm. Lancet. 2006;367(9521):1521–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fekadu S, Taye K, Teshome W, Asnake S. Prevalence of parasitic infections in HIV-positive patients in southern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Journal of infection in developing countries. 2013;7(11):868–72. Epub 2013/11/19. doi: 10.3855/jidc.2906 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mamo H. Intestinal parasitic infections among prison inmates and tobacco farm workers in Shewa Robit, north-central Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e99559 Epub 2014/06/14. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4057221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099559 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Webb EL, Kyosiimire-Lugemwa J, Kizito D, Nkurunziza P, Lule S, Muhangi L, et al. The effect of anthelmintic treatment during pregnancy on HIV plasma viral load: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Uganda. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes. 2012;60(3):307–13. Epub 2012/06/26. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3383620. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182511e42 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Walson J, Singa B, Sangaré L, Naulikha J, Piper B, Richardson B, et al. Empiric deworming to delay HIV disease progression in adults with HIV who are ineligible for initiation of antiretroviral treatment (the HEAT study): a multi-site, randomised trial. Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2012;12(12):925–32. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70207-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Abossie A, Petros B. Deworming and the immune status of HIV positive pre-antiretroviral therapy individuals in Arba Minch, Chencha and Gidole hospitals, Southern Ethiopia. BMC research notes. 2015;8:483 Epub 2015/09/30. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4585997. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1461-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Adeleke OA, Yogeswaran P, Wright G. Intestinal helminth infections amongst HIV-infected adults in Mthatha General Hospital, South Africa. African journal of primary health care & family medicine. 2015;7(1):E1–7. Epub 2016/02/05. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4729221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Walson JL, Otieno PA, Mbuchi M, Richardson BA, Lohman-Payne B, Macharia SW, et al. Albendazole treatment of HIV-1 and helminth co-infection: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. AIDS. 2008;22(13):1601–9. Epub 2008/08/02. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2637615. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32830a502e [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lankowski AJ, Tsai AC, Kanyesigye M, Bwana M, Haberer JE, Wenger M, et al. Empiric deworming and CD4 count recovery in HIV-infected Ugandans initiating antiretroviral therapy. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2014;8(8):e3036 Epub 2014/08/08. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4125278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ivan E, Crowther NJ, Mutimura E, Rucogoza A, Janssen S, Njunwa KK, et al. Effect of deworming on disease progression markers in HIV-1-infected pregnant women on antiretroviral therapy: a longitudinal observational study from Rwanda. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60(1):135–42. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu715 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.George PJ, Anuradha R, Kumaran PP, Chandrasekaran V, Nutman TB, Babu S. Modulation of mycobacterial-specific Th1 and Th17 cells in latent tuberculosis by coincident hookworm infection. Journal of immunology. 2013;190(10):5161–8. Epub 2013/04/12. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3646958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Simon GG. Impacts of neglected tropical disease on incidence and progression of HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria: scientific links. International journal of infectious diseases: IJID: official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2015;42:54–7. Epub 2015/11/26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.DiNardo AR, Mace EM, Lesteberg K, Cirillo JD, Mandalakas AM, Graviss EA, et al. Schistosome Soluble Egg Antigen Decreases Mycobacterium tuberculosis–Specific CD4+T-Cell Effector Function With Concomitant Arrest of Macrophage Phago-Lysosome Maturation. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2016;214(3):479–88. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mishra PK, Palma M, Bleich D, Loke P, Gause WC. Systemic impact of intestinal helminth infections. Mucosal immunology. 2014;7(4):753–62. Epub 2014/04/17. doi: 10.1038/mi.2014.23 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Du L, Tang H, Ma Z, Xu J, Gao W, Chen J, et al. The protective effect of the recombinant 53-kDa protein of Trichinella spiralis on experimental colitis in mice. Digestive diseases and sciences. 2011;56(10):2810–7. Epub 2011/04/09. doi: 10.1007/s10620-011-1689-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bhargava P, Li C, Stanya KJ, Jacobi D, Dai L, Liu S, et al. Immunomodulatory glycan LNFPIII alleviates hepatosteatosis and insulin resistance through direct and indirect control of metabolic pathways. Nature medicine. 2012;18(11):1665–72. Epub 2012/10/30. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3493877. doi: 10.1038/nm.2962 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ferreira I, Smyth D, Gaze S, Aziz A, Giacomin P, Ruyssers N, et al. Hookworm excretory/secretory products induce interleukin-4 (IL-4)+ IL-10+ CD4+ T cell responses and suppress pathology in a mouse model of colitis. Infection and immunity. 2013;81(6):2104–11. Epub 2013/04/03. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3676036. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00563-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wiria AE, Wammes LJ, Hamid F, Dekkers OM, Prasetyani MA, May L, et al. Relationship between carotid intima media thickness and helminth infections on Flores Island, Indonesia. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54855 Epub 2013/02/01. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3554693. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054855 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chatterjee S, Nutman TB. Helminth-induced immune regulation: implications for immune responses to tuberculosis. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11(1):e1004582 PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4310592. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004582 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Uganda Ministry of Health. Addendum to The National Antiretroviral Treatment Guidelines. 2013.
  • 26.WHO. Consolidated guidelines on HIV prevention, diagnosis, treatment and care for key populations. WHO, editor. France: WHO; 2016. [PubMed]
  • 27.WHO. Soil-transmitted helminthiases: Eliminating soil-transmitted helminthiases as a public health problem in children: Progress report 2001–2010 and strategic plan 2011–2020. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.
  • 28.Modjarrad K. HIV and helminths: time for a new direction. Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2013;13(10):835 doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70239-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mejia R, Vicuna Y, Broncano N, Sandoval C, Vaca M, Chico M, et al. A novel, multi-parallel, real-time polymerase chain reaction approach for eight gastrointestinal parasites provides improved diagnostic capabilities to resource-limited at-risk populations. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2013;88(6):1041–7. Epub 2013/03/20. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3752800. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.12-0726 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fahle GA, Fischer SH. Comparison of Six Commercial DNA Extraction Kits for Recovery of Cytomegalovirus DNA from Spiked Human Specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2000;38(10):3860–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cimino RO, Jeun R, Juarez M, Cajal PS, Vargas P, Echazu A, et al. Identification of human intestinal parasites affecting an asymptomatic peri-urban Argentinian population using multi-parallel quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Parasites & vectors. 2015;8:380. Epub 2015/07/18. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4504406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Schar F, Hattendorf J, Khieu V, Muth S, Char MC, Marti HP, et al. Strongyloides stercoralis larvae excretion patterns before and after treatment. Parasitology. 2014;141(7):892–7. doi: 10.1017/S0031182013002345 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.WHO. Helminth control in school-age children: a guide for managers of control programmes. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.WHO. Prevention and control of schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis: report of a WHO expert committee. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002 0512–3054. [PubMed]
  • 35.Pullan RL, Kabatereine NB, Bukirwa H, Staedke SG, Brooker S. Heterogeneities and consequences of Plasmodium species and hookworm coinfection: a population based study in Uganda. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2011;203(3):406–17. Epub 2010/12/29. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3038339. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiq063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ndibazza J, Webb EL, Lule S, Mpairwe H, Akello M, Oduru G, et al. Associations between maternal helminth and malaria infections in pregnancy and clinical malaria in the offspring: a birth cohort in entebbe, Uganda. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2013;208(12):2007–16. Epub 2013/08/02. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3836463. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit397 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mugisha JO, Baisley K, Asiki G, Seeley J, Kuper H. Prevalence, types, risk factors and clinical correlates of anaemia in older people in a rural Ugandan population. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e78394 Epub 2013/11/07. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3806814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Fuhrimann S, Winkler MS, Kabatereine NB, Tukahebwa EM, Halage AA, Rutebemberwa E, et al. Risk of Intestinal Parasitic Infections in People with Different Exposures to Wastewater and Fecal Sludge in Kampala, Uganda: A Cross-Sectional Study. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2016;10(3):e0004469 Epub 2016/03/05. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4777287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004469 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chami GF, Fenwick A, Bulte E, Kontoleon AA, Kabatereine NB, Tukahebwa EM, et al. Influence of Schistosoma mansoni and Hookworm Infection Intensities on Anaemia in Ugandan Villages. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2015;9(10):e0004193 PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4626098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Stothard JR, Pleasant J, Oguttu D, Adriko M, Galimaka R, Ruggiana A, et al. Strongyloides stercoralis: a field-based survey of mothers and their preschool children using ELISA, Baermann and Koga plate methods reveals low endemicity in western Uganda. Journal of helminthology. 2008;82(3):263–9. Epub 2008/04/18. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X08971996 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lule JR, Mermin J, Awor A, Hughes P, Kigozi A, Wafula W, et al. Aetiology of diarrhoea among persons with HIV & their family memebers in rural Uganda: A community-based study. East African Medical Journal. 2010;86(9); 422–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sousa-Figueiredo JC, Day M, Betson M, Rowell C, Wamboko A, Arinaitwe M, et al. Field survey for strongyloidiasis in eastern Uganda with observations on efficacy of preventive chemotherapy and co-occurrence of soil-transmitted helminthiasis/intestinal schistosomiasis. Journal of helminthology. 2011;85(3):325–33. Epub 2010/10/22. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X10000623 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gassama A, Thiaw B, Dia N, Fall F, Camara P, Hovette P, et al. [Infective etiology of diarrhea in adults with HIV infection in Dakar: a case-control study on 594 patients]. Dakar Med. 2001;46(1):46–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Maikai BV, Umoh JU, Lawal IA, Kudi AC, Ejembi CL, Xiao L. Molecular characterizations of Cryptosporidium, Giardia, and Enterocytozoon in humans in Kaduna State, Nigeria. Experimental parasitology. 2012;131(4):452–6. Epub 2012/06/06. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2012.05.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kiros H, Nibret E, Munshea A, Kerisew B, Adal M. Prevalence of intestinal protozoan infections among individuals living with HIV/AIDS at Felegehiwot Referral Hospital, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia. International journal of infectious diseases. 2015;35:80–6. Epub 2015/04/29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Loukas A, Prociv P. Immune responses in hookworm infections. Clinical microbiology reviews. 2001;14(4):689–703, table of contents. Epub 2001/10/05. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC89000. doi: 10.1128/CMR.14.4.689-703.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Luckheeram RV, Zhou R, Verma AD, Xia B. CD4(+)T cells: differentiation and functions. Clinical & developmental immunology. 2012;2012:925135. Epub 2012/04/05. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3312336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Croese J, Giacomin P, Navarro S, Clouston A, McCann L, Dougall A, et al. Experimental hookworm infection and gluten microchallenge promote tolerance in celiac disease. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology. 2015;135(2):508–16. Epub 2014/09/25. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.07.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gazzinelli-Guimarães P, Souza-Fagundes E, Cancado G, Martins V, Dhom-Lemos L, Ricci N, et al. Cell apoptosis induced by hookworm antigens: a strategy of immunomodulation Frontiers in Bioscience. 2013;E5(2):662–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Cuellar C, Wu W, Mendez S. The hookworm tissue inhibitor of metalloproteases (Ac-TMP-1) modifies dendritic cell function and induces generation of CD4 and CD8 suppressor T cells. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2009;3(5):e439 Epub 2009/05/27. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2678263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000439 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Gaze S, McSorley HJ, Daveson J, Jones D, Bethony JM, Oliveira LM, et al. Characterising the mucosal and systemic immune responses to experimental human hookworm infection. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(2):e1002520 PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3276555. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.George PJ, Anuradha R, Kumar NP, Kumaraswami V, Nutman TB, Babu S. Evidence of microbial translocation associated with perturbations in T cell and antigen-presenting cell homeostasis in hookworm infections. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2012;6(10):e1830 PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3464301. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001830 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Sangare LR, Herrin BR, John-Stewart G, Walson JL. Species-specific treatment effects of helminth/HIV-1 co-infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasitology. 2011;138(12):1546–58. Epub 2011/07/07. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3387276. doi: 10.1017/S0031182011000357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Walson JL, Herrin BR, John-Stewart G. Deworming helminth co-infected individuals for delaying HIV disease progression. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2009;(3):CD006419 Epub 2009/07/10. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2871762. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006419.pub3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wynn TA. Fibrotic disease and the T(H)1/T(H)2 paradigm. Nature reviews Immunology. 2004;4(8):583–94. Epub 2004/08/03. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2702150. doi: 10.1038/nri1412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Schacker TW, Brenchley JM, Beilman GJ, Reilly C, Pambuccian SE, Taylor J, et al. Lymphatic tissue fibrosis is associated with reduced numbers of naive CD4+ T cells in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. Clinical and vaccine immunology: CVI. 2006;13(5):556–60. Epub 2006/05/10. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1459657. doi: 10.1128/CVI.13.5.556-560.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lindo J, Dubon J, Ager A, de Gourville E, Solo-Gabriele H, Klaskala W, et al. Intestinal parasitic infections in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive and HIV-negative individuals in San Pedro Sula, Honduras. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 1998;58(4):431–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Wiwanitkit V. Intestinal parasitic infections in Thai HIV-infected patients with different immunity status. BMC Gastroenterology. 2001;1(1):3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hailemariam G, Kassu A, Abebe G, Abate E, Damte D, Mekonnen E, et al. Intestinal Parasitic Infections in HIV/AIDS and HIV Seronegative Individuals in a Teaching Hospital. Japanese journal of infectious diseases. 2004;57(2):41–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Assefa S, Erko B, Medhin G, Assefa Z, Shimelis T. Intestinal parasitic infections in relation to HIV/AIDS status, diarrhea and CD4 T-cell count. BMC Infect Dis. 2009;9:155 PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2751775. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-9-155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Edouard A, Edouard S, Desbois N, Plumelle Y, Rat C, Calès-Quist D, et al. [Evolution in the prevalence of intestinal parasitosis in the Fort de France University Hospital (Martinique)]. Presse Med. 2004;33(11):707–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Alonso-Sanz M, Chaves F, Dronda F, Catalán S, González-López A. [Intestinal parasitoses in the prison population in the Madrid area (1991–1993)]. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 1995;13(2):90–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Hunter G, Bagshawe AF, Baboo KS, Luke R, Prociv P. Intestinal parasites in Zambian patients with AIDS. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1992;86(5):543–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Tian LG, Cheng GJ, Chen JX, Cai YC, Guo J, Tong XM, et al. [Survey on co-infection with HIV and intestinal parasites in high prevalence areas of HIV/AIDS, China]. Zhongguo Xue Xi Chong Bing Fang Zhi Za Zhi. 2012;24(2):168–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Sanyaolu AO, Oyibo WA, Fagbenro-Beyioku AF, Gbadegeshin AH, Iriemenam NC. Comparative study of entero-parasitic infections among HIV sero-positive and sero-negative patients in Lagos, Nigeria. Acta Trop. 2011;120(3):268–72. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2011.08.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Knopp S, Mgeni AF, Khamis IS, Steinmann P, Stothard JR, Rollinson D, et al. Diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminths in the era of preventive chemotherapy: effect of multiple stool sampling and use of different diagnostic techniques. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2008;2(11):e331 PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2570799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000331 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Hotez P. Hookworm and poverty. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1136:38–44. doi: 10.1196/annals.1425.000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Goncalves AQ, Junqueira AC, Abellana R, Barrio PC, Terrazas WC, Sodre FC, et al. Prevalence of intestinal parasites and risk factors forspecific and multiple helminth infections in a remote city of the Brazilian Amazon. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2016;49(1):119–24. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0128-2015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Reichert F, Pilger D, Schuster A, Lesshafft H, Guedes de Oliveira S, Ignatius R, et al. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Hookworm-Related Cutaneous Larva Migrans (HrCLM) in a Resource-Poor Community in Manaus, Brazil. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2016;10(3):e0004514 PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4807001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Santos AC, Almeida AM. Nutritional status and CD4 cell counts in patients with HIV/AIDS receiving antiretroviral therapy. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2013;46(6):698–703. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0125-2013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Koethe JR, Jenkins CA, Lau B, Shepherd BE, Wester W, Rebeiro PF, et al. Higher Time-updated Body Mass Index: Association with Improved CD4+ Cell Recovery on HIV Treatment. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes. 2016; 73(2):197–204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Siedner MJ, Lankowski A, Tsai AC, Muzoora C, Martin JN, Hunt PW, et al. GPS-measured distance to clinic, but not self-reported transportation factors, are associated with missed HIV clinic visits in rural Uganda. AIDS. 2013;27(9):1503–8. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3745818. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32835fd873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Muyingo SK, Walker AS, Reid A, Munderi P, Gibb DM, Ssali F, et al. Patterns of individual and population-level adherence to antiretroviral therapy and risk factors for poor adherence in the first year of the DART trial in Uganda and Zimbabwe. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes. 2008;48(4):468–75. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31817dc3fd [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Martin F, Russell S, Seeley J. Higher quality of life and lower depression for people on ART in Uganda as compared to a community control group. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e105154 PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4149377. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kim J, Zhang W, Nyonyitono M, Lourenco L, Nanfuka M, Okoboi S, et al. Feasibility and acceptability of mobile phone short message service as a support for patients receiving antiretroviral therapy in rural Uganda: a cross-sectional study. J Int AIDS Soc. 2015;18:20311 PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4676808. doi: 10.7448/IAS.18.1.20311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.McMahon JH, Jordan MR, Kelley K, Bertagnolio S, Hong SY, Wanke CA, et al. Pharmacy adherence measures to assess adherence to antiretroviral therapy: review of the literature and implications for treatment monitoring. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(4):493–506. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3060901. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Gare J, Kelly-Hanku A, Ryan CE, David M, Kaima P, Imara U, et al. Factors Influencing Antiretroviral Adherence and Virological Outcomes in People Living with HIV in the Highlands of Papua New Guinea. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0134918 PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4526685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134918 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 STROBE

(DOCX)

S1 DNA Extraction Protocol

(DOCX)

S1 Data

(XLSX)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES