Skip to main content
Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research logoLink to Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research
. 2017 May 31;23:2660–2667. doi: 10.12659/MSM.904040

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Chronic Constipation Among Women Aged 50 Years and Older in Shanghai, China

Ling Huang 1,A,D,E,F,G,*, Huihong Jiang 2,B,C,D,E,F,*, Maoling Zhu 1,B,E,F, Baocai Wang 1,B,E,F, Minsi Tong 1,B,E,F, Huaguang Li 3,C,D,E, Mou-bin Lin 2,A,E,G,, Li Li 1,A,E,F
PMCID: PMC5462481  PMID: 28562581

Abstract

Background

Chronic constipation (CC) is a major public health problem worldwide, especially in elderly women. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of CC among women aged 50 years and older in Shanghai, China.

Material/Method

A cross-sectional survey was conducted on 1950 women aged 50 years and older, randomly sampled in Yangpu District of Shanghai from April to October 2015. Information on demographic characteristics, lifestyle habits, medical history, and defecation situation was collected through in-person interviews. CC was defined according to Rome III criteria. The data were analyzed by chi-square test and multiple logistic regression analysis.

Results

The response rate to the survey was 80.4%. Of the 1568 participants, 77 were diagnosed with CC, with a prevalence of 4.9%. Moreover, the prevalence increased with advancing age. Multiple logistic analyses showed that body mass index (BMI) ≥25.0 kg/m2, non-manual occupation, premenopausal period, no delivery history, poor sleep quality, meat-based diet, and less physical exercise were significant risk factors for CC in the population of women aged 50 years and older.

Conclusions

CC was a common health problem among women aged 50 years and older in Shanghai, and the prevalence was positively associated with BMI ≥25.0 kg/m2, non-manual occupation, premenopausal period, no delivery history, poor sleep quality, meat-based diet, and less physical exercise. Further studies are needed to identify the risk factors and potential interventions for CC.

MeSH Keywords: Constipation, Prevalence, Risk Factors, Women

Background

Constipation is characterized by unsatisfactory defecation that results from infrequent stools, difficult stool passage, or both [1]. Various studies have indicated that chronic constipation (CC) has a major negative impact on quality of life, affecting both physical and emotional well-being [2,3]. In recent years, CC has become a common health problem worldwide, resulting in a major economic and social burden [4,5]. According to reports from Western countries, the prevalence of CC in the general population ranges from 2% to 28%, with an increasing trend over years [1,6,7]. Moreover, severe constipation is frequently observed in elderly women, with rates of 2 to 3 times higher than that of their male counterparts [6,8]. CC is a heterogeneous disorder, with multiple causes, including dysfunction of intestinal motility, visceral sensitivity, anorectal musculature, and the enteric nervous system [9]. In addition, many factors may also contribute to the development of CC, such as age, gender, physical activity, dietary habits, medication use and psychological parameters [6,10].

However, CC has so far received much less investigative attention in Asian populations as compared with Western populations. What’s worse, many people in Asian countries, especially the elderly and women, have a relatively poor knowledge of how to prevent CC [11]. Therefore, it is extremely important to know the magnitude of the problem in this population, as well as the associated factors involved, so that preventive measures can be applied. The purpose of the present study was to estimate the prevalence of CC and its associated risk factors among women aged 50 years and older in Shanghai, China.

Material and Methods

Study design and population

This study was a population-based, cross-sectional field survey among women aged 50 years and older and living in the communities of Yangpu District, Shanghai, China. To select a representative sample of the population, a stratified multistage clustered probability sampling design was applied [12]. A total of 1950 eligible women from 8 communities were contacted to participate in this survey from April to October 2015. The survey was conducted at participations’ homes by well-trained interviewers using a structured questionnaire, which included demographic characteristics, lifestyle habits, medical information, and defecation situation. Fasting blood glucose (FBG) and anthropometric measurements, including current weight, height, and circumferences of the waist and hips, were also taken by using a standard protocol. This study was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki [13] and was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Yangpu Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Contents of survey

The survey consisted of 4 parts: (1) General information, which included age, body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), FBG, marital status, educational level, current/past occupation, menstrual situation, and delivery history. BMI was defined as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared, and participants were categorized as normal weight (<25.0 kg/m2) or overweight/obese (≥25.0 kg/m2) [14]. WHR was defined as waist circumference divided by hip circumference, and women with a WHR >0.85 were classified as having central obesity [15]; (2) Lifestyle habits, which included smoking and alcohol-drinking history, self-rated sleep quality, diet structure, frequencies of fruit consumption, and physical exercise. A positive smoking history was defined as smoking more than 5 cigarettes per week for at least 1 year, and a positive drinking history was defined as drinking more than 35 g of alcohol at least twice a week. Self-rated sleep quality was determined as a response to the question “Would you say that, in general, your sleep quality is good, fair, or poor?” Responses were dichotomized into good/fair and poor. Meat-based diet was defined as a consumption of raw vegetables <100 g/day, a ratio of refined grain products to whole grain products >0.95 and a consumption >105 g/week of meat products or >300 g/week of meat. Adequate fruit consumption was defined as 2 or more servings of fruit (300 g/serving) per day, and participants were grouped into either ≥4 days/week or ≤3 days/week. Regular physical exercise was defined as participation in any physical activity that was performed long enough to sweat at least 3 times a week; (3) Medical information was collected by asking “Has a doctor or other health professional ever told you that you have [disease]?” and “Have you ever had abdominal and/or gynecological surgery?” Disease types were deemed positive according to self-report: hypertension, cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, hyperlipidemia, steatohepatitis, diabetes, cholelithiasis, and thyroid disease; and (4) CC was defined according to Rome III criteria with the following constipation judgment indicators: defecation less than 3 times per week, stool weight of less than 35 g/d, dry and hard stool, difficulty in defecating during more than 25% of evacuation attempts, and symptom onset over 6 months [16].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed by SPSS software (SPSS 19.0, IBM, Chicago, IL). The prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of CC were calculated for the entire population and the population by age group. Chi-square and t tests were used to analyze the differences in patient characteristics and outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were utilized to identify risk factors for CC while controlling potential confounders [17]. The odds ratio (OR) and 95%CI were estimated for each factor. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Prevalence and characteristics of CC

Of 1950 eligible women, 382 refused to participate, and finally 1568 (80.4% response rate) were recruited and completed the survey. Among them, 77 women were diagnosed with CC based on Rome III criteria, with a prevalence of 4.9% (95% CI 3.8–6.0%). Moreover, the prevalence of CC increased with advancing age, from 4.5% in the 50–59 years age group to 6.0% in the ≥80 years age group (Table 1). However, no significant difference in age distribution was observed between individuals with and without CC (P=0.573). Compared with the non-CC group, women with CC were more likely to be overweight/obese (P=0.046), engage in non-manual work (P=0.009), and eat meat-based diets (P=0.013), but less likely to perform physical exercise (P=0.011). In addition, they were more likely to be in premenopausal period (P<0.001), have no delivery history (P=0.001), and suffer poor sleep quality (P<0.001) (Table 2).

Table 1.

Prevalence of chronic constipation by age group.

Study population CC Prevalence, % (95% CI)
Total 1568 77 4.9 (3.8–6.0)
Age (years)
 50–59 572 26 4.5 (2.8–6.3)
 60–69 653 32 4.9 (3.2–6.6)
 70–79 226 12 5.3 (2.4–8.2)
 ≥80 117 7 6.0 (1.7–10.3)

CC – chronic constipation; CI – confidence interval.

Table 2.

Sociodemographics and medical information of individuals with and without chronic constipation.

Variables CC (n=77) Non-CC (n=1491) P value
Age (years)
 Median (Range) 62 (50–85) 62 (50–91) 0.573
BMI (kg/m2)
 <25.0 43 (55.8%) 1005 (67.4%)
 ≥25.0 34 (44.2%) 486 (32.6%) 0.046
WHR
 ≤0.85 36 (46.8%) 602 (40.4%)
 >0.85 41 (53.2%) 889 (59.6%) 0.285
Marital status
 Married 64 (83.1%) 1309 (87.8%)
 Single/divorced/widowed/separated 13 (16.9%) 182 (12.2%) 0.286
Educational level
 <High school 39 (50.6%) 868 (58.2%)
 ≥High school 38 (49.4%) 623 (41.8%) 0.195
Current/past occupation
 Manual 57 (74.0%) 1275 (85.5%)
 Non-manual 20 (26.0%) 216 (14.5%) 0.009
Menstrual situation
 Postmenopausal 64 (83.1%) 1428 (95.8%)
 Premenopausal 13 (16.9%) 63 (4.2%) <0.001
Delivery history
 Yes 70 (90.0%) 1465 (98.3%)
 No 7 (9.1%) 26 (1.7%) 0.001
Smoking history
 Yes 4 (5.2% 42 (2.8%)
 No 73 (94.8%) 1449 (97.2%) 0.281
Alcohol-drinking history
 Yes 7 (9.1%) 71 (4.8%)
 No 70 (90.9%) 1420 (95.2%) 0.101
Self-rated sleep quality
 Good/fair 45 (58.4%) 1175 (78.8%)
 Poor 32 (41.6%) 316 (21.2%) <0.001
Meat-based diet
 No 68 (88.3%) 1421 (95.3%)
 Yes 9 (11.7%) 70 (4.7%) 0.013
Frequency of fruit consumption
 ≥4 days/week 50 (64.9%) 968 (64.9%)
 ≤3 days/week 27 (35.1%) 523 (35.1%) 1.000
Frequency of physical exercise
 ≥3 days/week 38 (49.4%) 957 (64.2%)
 ≤2 days/week 39 (50.6%) 534 (35.8%) 0.011
Hypertension
 Yes 28 (36.4%) 649 (43.5%)
 No 49 (63.6%) 842 (56.5%) 0.239
Cardiovascular disease
 Yes 14 (18.2%) 375 (25.2%)
 No 63 (81.8%) 1116 (74.8%) 0.179
Cerebrovascular disease
 Yes 7 (9.1%) 139 (9.3%)
 No 70 (90.9%) 1352 (90.7%) 1.000
Hyperlipidemia
 Yes 11 (14.3%) 275 (18.4%)
 No 66 (85.7%) 1216 (81.6%) 0.372
Steatohepatitis
 Yes 18 (23.4%) 370 (24.8%)
 No 59 (76.6%) 1121 (75.2%) 0.790
Diabetes
 Yes 14 (18.2%) 205 (13.7%)
 No 63 (81.8%) 1286 (86.3%) 0.310
FPG (mmol/L)
 <7.0 66 (85.7%) 1351 (90.6%)
 ≥7.0 11 (14.3%) 140 (9.4%) 0.156
Cholelithiasis
 Yes 10 (13.0%) 244 (16.4%)
 No 67 (87.0%) 1247 (83.6%) 0.527
Thyroid disease
 Yes 8 (10.4%) 187 (12.5%)
 No 69 (89.6%) 1304 (87.5%) 0.606
Abdominal and/or gynecological surgery
 Yes 23 (29.9%) 389 (26.1%)
 No 54 (70.1%) 1102 (73.9%) 0.507

CC – chronic constipation; BMI – body mass index; WHR – waist-to-hip ratio; FPG – fasting blood glucose.

Risk factors associated with CC

Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the association of CC with each variable after adjustment for potential confounders (Table 3). The results showed that BMI ≥25.0 kg/m2 (OR=2.34, 95% CI 1.34–4.08), non-manual occupation (OR=2.41, 95% CI 1.33–4.35), premenopausal period (OR=4.86, 95% CI 2.31–10.24), no delivery history (OR=6.91, 95% CI 2.47–19.31), poor sleep quality (OR=2.99, 95% CI 1.79–4.99), meat-based diet (OR=2.29, 95% CI 1.01–5.19), and less physical exercise (OR=1.65, 95% CI 1.02–2.70) were significant risk factors for CC in the population of women aged 50 years and older, whereas no significant association was detected for age, educational level, or diabetes.

Table 3.

Multivariate logistic analysis of risk factors associated with chronic constipation.

Variables OR (95% CI) P value
Age (years)
 <70 1 (reference)
 ≥70 1.39 (0.72–2.66) 0.326
BMI (kg/m2)
 <25.0 1 (reference)
 ≥25.0 2.34 (1.34–4.08) 0.003
WHR
 ≤0.85 1 (reference)
 >0.85 0.61 (0.36–1.04) 0.067
Marital status
 Married 1 (reference)
 Single/divorced/widowed/separated 1.39 (0.70–2.76) 0.347
Educational level
 <High school 1 (reference)
 ≥High school 1.12 (0.66–1.91) 0.675
Current/past occupation
 Manual 1 (reference)
 Non-manual 2.41 (1.33–4.35) 0.004
Menstrual situation
 Postmenopausal 1 (reference)
 Premenopausal 4.86 (2.31–10.24) <0.001
Delivery history
 Yes 1 (reference)
 No 6.91 (2.47–19.31) <0.001
Smoking history
 Yes 1 (reference)
 No 1.10 (0.34–3.60) 0.874
Alcohol-drinking history
 Yes 1 (reference)
 No 0.56 (0.23–1.38) 0.208
Self-rated sleep quality
 Good/fair 1 (reference)
 Poor 2.99 (1.79–4.99) <0.001
Meat-based diet
 No 1 (reference)
 Yes 2.29 (1.01–5.19) 0.048
Frequency of fruit consumption
 ≥4 days/week 1 (reference)
 ≤3 days/week 0.92 (0.55–1.55) 0.752
Frequency of physical exercise
 ≥3 days/week 1 (reference)
 ≤2 days/week 1.65 (1.02–2.70) 0.043
Hypertension
 Yes 1 (reference)
 No 1.48 (0.84–2.61) 0.171
Cardiovascular disease
 Yes 1 (reference)
 No 1.61 (0.82–3.18) 0.169
Cerebrovascular disease
 Yes 1 (reference)
 No 1.01 (0.41–2.53) 0.979
Hyperlipidemia
 Yes 1 (reference)
 No 1.43 (0.70–2.92) 0.323
Steatohepatitis
 Yes 1 (reference)
 No 1.09 (0.58–2.07) 0.784
Diabetes
 Yes 1 (reference)
 No 0.66 (0.30–1.47) 0.313
FPG (mmol/L)
 <7.0 1 (reference)
 ≥7.0 1.32 (0.56–3.10) 0.531
Cholelithiasis
 Yes 1 (reference)
 No 1.47 (0.70–3.11) 0.314
Thyroid disease
 Yes 1 (reference)
 No 1.45 (0.66–3.21) 0.357
Abdominal and/or gynecological surgery
 Yes 1 (reference)
 No 0.77 (0.45–1.35) 0.364

CC – chronic constipation; BMI – body mass index; WHR – waist-to-hip ratio; FPG – fasting blood glucose; OR – odds ratio; CI – confidence interval.

Discussion

In this study, we found that the prevalence of CC among women aged 50 years and older in Shanghai was 4.9%, and the prevalence was positively associated with BMI ≥25.0 kg/m2, non-manual occupation, premenopausal period, no delivery history, poor sleep quality, meat-based diet, and less physical exercise. To our knowledge, this is the first study specifically designed to estimate the epidemiology of CC among women aged 50 years and older in China.

CC is a major public health problem worldwide, especially in elderly women. However, the reported prevalence of CC varies widely between studies, which may be mainly attributed to geographical factors, differences in the definitions used, and the age distributions of study populations [18,19]. Our study cohort consisted of women aged 50 years and older in Shanghai, China, a population in which the prevalence of CC has not been studied in depth previously. According to Rome III criteria, the prevalence of CC was found to be 4.9% in this study population. This finding is substantially lower compared to the prevalence reported for many elderly female populations in Western countries (12–34%) [1,2022]. The Rome IV criteria were published in 2016 and are similar to Rome III but further emphasize the subtypes of constipation [23]. We also compared the Rome III and Rome IV criteria for the diagnosis of CC, and found the same prevalence in our study population. In addition, consistent with the previous studies [24,25], we found that the prevalence of CC increased with advancing age.

In this study, we also evaluated the potential risk factors for CC. Age effects on the prevalence of constipation have been frequently reported in previous studies [18]. Our study data showed that the prevalence of CC increased with age, but no significant association was identified in the multiple logistic analyses, suggesting that age might not be a major risk factor for constipation in this study population. Poor lifestyle habits and psychological well-being have also been suggested as important risk factors for CC [10,18]. These were evident in our study as being overweight/obese, less physical exercise, meat-based diet, and poor sleep quality were found to contribute significantly to CC. Moreover, we found that women in premenopausal period or with no delivery history appeared to be more likely to suffer from constipation, which might be associated with the fluctuations in female sex hormones and emotions [26,27]. We also observed that, compared with manual workers, non-manual workers tended to have a higher risk for CC. A possible explanation for this phenomenon was that they had a more sedentary lifestyle and greater mental stress [28,29]. However, in our study, no significant association with CC was detected for educational level or diabetes, which had been reported in some studies [30,31]. Given that the pathophysiology of constipation is not clearly identified as yet, the causes for these differences remain to be elucidated. In addition to these factors, medication use may also be implicated in the development of constipation. Many drug classes, including diuretics, antidepressants, aluminum-containing antacids, antihistamines, opioids, antispasmodics and anticonvulsants, have been reported to be associated with a nearly 2- to 3-fold increased risk of CC [32]. Unfortunately, because of the self-reported nature of the survey, we failed to acquire sufficient data about medication use and estimate the effect of previous treatment for constipation.

Some other limitations of this study should be acknowledged. First, there was limited generalizability of the findings as the sample was recruited from only 1 district of Shanghai. Second, most variables investigated were self-reported; hence, the potential for recall bias was inevitable. In addition, due to the cross-sectional design, a causal relationship between CC and risk factors could not be determined. Hence, further population-based studies with larger sample sizes and long-term follow-up are required to identify the risk factors and potential interventions for CC.

Conclusions

Our study results suggest that CC is a common gastrointestinal disorder among women aged 50 years and older in Shanghai, with a prevalence of 4.9%. Moreover, BMI ≥25.0 kg/m2, non-manual occupation, premenopausal period, no delivery history, poor sleep quality, meat-based diet, and less physical exercise were the potential risk factors for CC in elderly women.

Footnotes

Source of support: This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (No. 201440351and ZK2015A32)

References

  • 1.Choung RS, Locke GR, III, Schleck CD, et al. Cumulative incidence of chronic constipation: A population-based study 1988–2003. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26:1521–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03540.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Glia A, Lindberg G. Quality of life in patients with different types of functional constipation. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997;32:1083–89. doi: 10.3109/00365529709002985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Belsey J, Greenfield S, Candy D, et al. Systematic review: Impact of constipation on quality of life in adults and children. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;31:938–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04273.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dennison C, Prasad M, Lloyd A, et al. The health-related quality of life and economic burden of constipation. Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23:461–76. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200523050-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Singh G, Lingala V, Wang H, et al. Use of health care resources and cost of care for adults with constipation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:1053–58. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Higgins PD, Johanson JF. Epidemiology of constipation in North America: A systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:750–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.04114.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wald A, Scarpignato C, Mueller-Lissner S, et al. A multinational survey of prevalence and patterns of laxative use among adults with self-defined constipation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;28:917–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03806.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Vazquez Roque M, Bouras EP. Epidemiology and management of chronic constipation in elderly patients. Clin Interv Aging. 2015;10:919–30. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S54304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.American College of Gastroenterology Chronic Constipation Task Force. An evidence-based approach to the management of chronic constipation in North America. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:S1–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.50613_1.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Towers AL, Burgio KL, Locher JL, et al. Constipation in the elderly: Influence of dietary, psychological, and physiological factors. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994;42:701–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb06527.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rajindrajith S, Devanarayana NM, Adhikari C, et al. Constipation in children: An epidemiological study in Sri Lanka using Rome III criteria. Arch Dis Child. 2010;97:43–45. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.173716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Korn EL, Graubard BI. Estimation in multi-stage surveys. Am J Public Health. 1991;81:1166–73. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.9.1166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Association WM. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Am Coll Dent. 2014;81:14–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004;363:157–63. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15268-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.van Amelsvoort LG, Schouten EG, Kok FJ. Duration of shiftwork related to body mass index and waist to hip ratio. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999;23:973–78. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Drossman DA, Dumitrascu DL. Rome III: New standard for functional gastrointestinal disorders. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2006;15:237–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Localio AR, Margolis DJ, Berlin JA. Relative risks and confidence intervals were easily computed indirectly from multivariable logistic regression. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:874–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mugie SM, Benninga MA, Di Lorenzo C. Epidemiology of constipation in children and adults: A systematic review. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;25:3–18. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Peppas G, Alexiou VG, Mourtzoukou E, et al. Epidemiology of constipation in Europe and Oceania: A systematic review. BMC Gastroenterol. 2008;8:5. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-8-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Andy UU, Vaughan CP, Burgio KL, et al. Shared risk factors for constipation, fecal Incontinence, and combined symptoms in older US adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64:e183–88. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.De Giorgio R, Ruggeri E, Stanghellini V, et al. Chronic constipation in the elderly: A primer for the gastroenterologist. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015;15:130. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0366-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schaefer DC, Cheskin LJ. Constipation in the elderly. Am Fam Physician. 1998;58:907–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mearin F, Lacy BE, Chang L, et al. Bowel disorders. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:1393–407. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chu H, Zhong L, Li H, et al. Epidemiology characteristics of constipation for general population, pediatric population, and elderly population in China. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2014;2014:532734. doi: 10.1155/2014/532734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Talley NJ, Jones M, Nuyts G, et al. Risk factors for chronic constipation based on a general practice sample. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:1107–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07465.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mayer EA, Naliboff B, Lee O, et al. Review article: Gender-related differences in functional gastrointestinal disorders. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1999;13:65–69. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1999.00008.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fukuda S, Matsuzaka M, Takahashi I, et al. Bowel habits before and during menses in Japanese women of climacteric age: A population based study. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2005;206:99–104. doi: 10.1620/tjem.206.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shi W, Xu X, Zhang Y, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors of functional constipation in pregnant women. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0133521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Courtney JG, Longnecker MP, Theorell T, et al. Stressful life events and the risk of colorectal cancer. Epidemiology. 1993;4:407–14. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199309000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Stewart WF, Liberman JN, Sandler RS, et al. Epidemiology of constipation (EPOC) study in the United States: Relation of clinical subtypes to sociodemographic features. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:3530–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01642.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bytzer P, Talley NJ, Leemon M, et al. Prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms associated with diabetes mellitus: A population-based survey of 15 000 adults. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:1989–96. doi: 10.1001/archinte.161.16.1989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Talley NJ, Jones M, Nuyts G, et al. Risk factors for chronic constipation based on a general practice sample. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:1107–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07465.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research are provided here courtesy of International Scientific Information, Inc.

RESOURCES