Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 14;8(20):33884–33896. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13934

Table 3. Meta-analysis of the associations between 18F-FDG PET parameters and survival outcomes.

Endpoint Volumetric parameters Factor No. of studies Heterogeneity test (I2, P) Effect model HR 95%CI of HR Conclusion
EFS SUVmax Cutoff method
ROC 8 20 fixed 1.94 1.47-2.58 significant
Others 3 50 random 10.37 2.52-42.69 significant
Threshold
≥8.78 5 90 random 3.72 1.01-13.67 significant
<8.78 6 64 random 3.76 1.76-8.04 significant
Analysis method
Univariate analysis 7 69 random 2.88 1.44-5.79 significant
Multivariate analysis 4 3 fixed 2.42 1.62-3.62 significant
OS SUVmax Cutoff method
ROC 5 0 fixed 2.13 1.45-3.12 significant
Others 2 0 fixed 1.98 1.23-3.21 significant
Threshold
≥8.78 5 0 fixed 1.89 1.38-2.60 significant
<8.78 2 0 fixed 4.47 1.78-11.22 significant
Analysis method
Univariate analysis 5 0 fixed 1.8 1.25-2.59 significant
Multivariate analysis 2 0 fixed 2.77 1.65-4.66 significant