Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2017 Jun 8;5(23):e00471-17. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00471-17

Whole-Genome Sequence of Coxiella burnetii Nine Mile RSA439 (Phase II, Clone 4), a Laboratory Workhorse Strain

Jess A Millar a, Paul A Beare b, Abraham S Moses a, Craig A Martens c, Robert A Heinzen b, Rahul Raghavan a,
PMCID: PMC5465618  PMID: 28596399

ABSTRACT

Here, we report the whole-genome sequence of Coxiella burnetii Nine Mile RSA439 (phase II, clone 4), a laboratory strain used extensively to investigate the biology of this intracellular bacterial pathogen. The genome consists of a 1.97-Mb chromosome and a 37.32-kb plasmid.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Coxiella burnetii is a Gram-negative intracellular bacterium that causes an influenza-like illness in humans called Q fever (1). Most infections occur through inhalation of aerosols originating from domestic livestock operations. Within the host cell, the pathogen becomes metabolically activated upon delivery into an acidic lysosome-like vacuole (2). The only C. burnetii virulence factor established in an immunocompetent animal model of infection is full-length lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which is synthesized by virulent phase I bacteria (3). Upon serial in vitro passage, phase I bacteria convert to avirulent phase II bacteria, which produce truncated LPS lacking O antigen and several core sugars (48).

The Nine Mile RSA439 (phase II, clone 4) strain (NMII) was derived from the Nine Mile strain, which was originally isolated in 1935 from the tick Dermacentor andersoni in Montana (9). The Nine Mile strain was passaged 94 times in embryonated hen’s eggs and then plaque purified to generate NMII (10, 11). NMII has an ~26-kb chromosomal deletion that eliminates several LPS biosynthetic genes and is associated with the production of a severely truncated LPS (1216). Because of clonality, avirulence in a guinea pig model of infection, and lack of phase reversion, NMII is considered a biosafety level 2 (BSL-2) bacterium (3, 17, 18). Other C. burnetii strains are considered BSL-3 bacteria and are regulated as select agents by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (18).

The NMII genome has not yet been sequenced; consequently, most researchers use the published genome of the Nine Mile RSA493 phase I strain (NMI) for reference (19). This occasionally leads to inconclusive results; for instance, the gene caeA is not annotated as a functional protein-coding gene in the NMI genome, but transcriptome analysis of NMII indicates its presence (20, 21). Thus, a fully annotated genome of the widely used NMII laboratory strain is needed to better understand the unique biology of this intracellular pathogen.

NMII was grown in ACCM-2 at 37°C in a 2.5% O2/5% CO2 environment in a tri-gas incubator (New Brunswick Scientific, NJ), as described previously (22). DNA was isolated from a 500-ml 7-day culture using phenol-chloroform with gentle cell disruption using a vortex adapter (Qiagen, CA) in order to minimize DNA fragmentation. DNA was sequenced using the PacBio RS II platform (Pacific Biosciences, USA), which generated a library containing 86,731 reads with an average length of 7,565 bp. Reads were assembled using HGAP 2.3.0 (23), which returned three contigs. The two chromosome contigs and the plasmid contig were closed in SSPACE 2.0 (24) using trimmed Illumina MiSeq 75-bp paired-end reads (5.50 million). Finally, CLC Genomics Workbench 6.5 (Qiagen) was used to map all Illumina and PacBio reads to the NMII chromosome (410× and 290× coverage, respectively) and plasmid (240× and 30× coverage, respectively) scaffolds to generate the consensus genome sequence. As expected, relative to the genome of NMI, homologs of genes CBU_0679 to CBU_0697 were completely deleted from the NMII genome (3, 1316). In addition, partial deletions of homologs of CBU_0678, CBU_0698, and CBU_0918 and several single nucleotide polymorphisms were observed.

Accession number(s).

The complete genome sequence of C. burnetii Nine Mile RSA439 (phase II, clone 4) has been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers CP020616 (chromosome) and CP020617 (plasmid).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health grants AI123464 and AI126385 (to R.R.), and by funding from the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (to R.A.H.).

Footnotes

Citation Millar JA, Beare PA, Moses AS, Martens CA, Heinzen RA, Raghavan R. 2017. Whole-genome sequence of Coxiella burnetii Nine Mile RSA439 (phase II, clone 4), a laboratory workhorse strain. Genome Announc 5:e00471-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00471-17.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Eldin C, Mélenotte C, Mediannikov O, Ghigo E, Million M, Edouard S, Mege JL, Maurin M, Raoult D. 2017. From Q fever to Coxiella burnetii infection: a paradigm change. Clin Microbiol Rev 30:115–190. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00045-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Voth DE, Heinzen RA. 2007. Lounging in a lysosome: the intracellular lifestyle of Coxiella burnetii. Cell Microbiol 9:829–840. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.00901.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Moos A, Hackstadt T. 1987. Comparative virulence of intra- and interstrain lipopolysaccharide variants of Coxiella burnetii in the guinea pig model. Infect Immun 55:1144–1150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Amano K, Williams JC. 1984. Chemical and immunological characterization of lipopolysaccharides from phase I and phase II Coxiella burnetii. J Bacteriol 160:994–1002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hackstadt T. 1986. Antigenic variation in the phase I lipopolysaccharide of Coxiella burnetii isolates. Infect Immun 52:337–340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fiset P. 1957. Phase variation of Rickettsia (Coxiella) burneti; study of the antibody response in guinea pigs and rabbits. Can J Microbiol 3:435–445. doi: 10.1139/m57-046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hackstadt T. 1990. The role of lipopolysaccharides in the virulence of Coxiella burnetii. Ann N Y Acad Sci 590:27–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1990.tb42203.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kersh GJ, Oliver LD, Self JS, Fitzpatrick KA, Massung RF. 2011. Virulence of pathogenic Coxiella burnetii strains after growth in the absence of host cells. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 11:1433–1438. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2011.0670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Davis GE, Cox HR. 1938. A filter-passing infectious agent isolated from ticks. I. Isolation from Dermacentor andersonii, reactions with animals, and filtration experiments. Publ Health Rep 53:2259–2276. doi:10.2307/4582746. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wike DA, Tallent G, Peacock MG, Ormsbee RA. 1972. Studies of the rickettsial plaque assay technique. Infect Immun 5:715–722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Williams JC, Peacock MG, McCaul TF. 1981. Immunological and biological characterization of Coxiella burnetii, phases I and II, separated from host components. Infect Immun 32:840–851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hackstadt T, Peacock MG, Hitchcock PJ, Cole RL. 1985. Lipopolysaccharide variation in Coxiella burnetii: intrastrain heterogeneity in structure and antigenicity. Infect Immun 48:359–365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Vodkin MH, Williams JC. 1986. Overlapping deletion in two spontaneous phase variants of Coxiella burnetii. J Gen Microbiol 132:2587–2594. 2587. doi: 10.1099/00221287-132-9-2587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hoover TA, Culp DW, Vodkin MH, Williams JC, Thompson HA. 2002. Chromosomal DNA deletions explain phenotypic characteristics of two antigenic variants, phase II and RSA 514 (crazy), of the Coxiella burnetii nine mile strain. Infect Immun 70:6726–6733. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.12.6726-2733.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Beare PA, Samuel JE, Howe D, Virtaneva K, Porcella SF, Heinzen RA. 2006. Genetic diversity of the Q fever agent, Coxiella burnetii, assessed by microarray-based whole-genome comparisons. J Bacteriol 188:2309–2324. doi: 10.1128/JB.188.7.2309-2324.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Denison AM, Massung RF, Thompson HA. 2007. Analysis of the O-antigen biosynthesis regions of phase II isolates of Coxiella burnetii. FEMS Microbiol Lett 267:102–107. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00544.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hackstadt T. 1996. Biosafety concerns and Coxiella burnetii. Trends Microbiol 4:341–342. doi: 10.1016/0966-842X(96)81555-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Samuel JE, Hendrix LR. 2009. Laboratory maintenance of Coxiella burnetii. Curr Protoc Microbiol Chapter 6:Unit 6C.1. doi: 10.1002/9780471729259.mc06c01s15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Seshadri R, Paulsen IT, Eisen JA, Read TD, Nelson KE, Nelson WC, Ward NL, Tettelin H, Davidsen TM, Beanan MJ, Deboy RT, Daugherty SC, Brinkac LM, Madupu R, Dodson RJ, Khouri HM, Lee KH, Carty HA, Scanlan D, Heinzen RA, Thompson HA, Samuel JE, Fraser CM, Heidelberg JF. 2003. Complete genome sequence of the Q-fever pathogen Coxiella burnetii. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:5455–5460. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0931379100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bisle S, Klingenbeck L, Borges V, Sobotta K, Schulze-Luehrmann J, Menge C, Heydel C, Gomes JP, Lührmann A. 2016. The inhibition of the apoptosis pathway by the Coxiella burnetii effector protein CaeA requires the EK repetition motif, but is independent of survivin. Virulence 7:400–412. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1139280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Raghavan R. 2016. A repeat motif on a Coxiella effector protein facilitates apoptosis inhibition. Virulence 7:369–371. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1156834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Omsland A, Beare PA, Hill J, Cockrell DC, Howe D, Hansen B, Samuel JE, Heinzen RA. 2011. Isolation from animal tissue and genetic transformation of Coxiella burnetii are facilitated by an improved axenic growth medium. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:3720–3725. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02826-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chin CS, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J, Heiner C, Clum A, Copeland A, Huddleston J, Eichler EE, Turner SW, Korlach J. 2013. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Methods 10:563–569. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Boetzer M, Henkel CV, Jansen HJ, Butler D, Pirovano W. 2011. Scaffolding pre-assembled contigs using SSPACE. Bioinformatics 27:578–579. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES