Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Microbiol. 2017 Feb 23;36:76–84. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2017.02.001

Exploring functional membrane microdomains in bacteria: an overview

Daniel Lopez 1,2,3,*, Gudrun Koch 1,2
PMCID: PMC5466155  EMSID: EMS71688  PMID: 28237903

Abstract

Recent studies show that internal organization of bacterial cells is more complex than previously appreciated. A clear example of this is the assembly of the nanoscale membrane platforms termed functional membrane microdomains. The lipid composition of these regions differs from that of the surrounding membrane; these domains confine a set of proteins involved in specific cellular processes such as protease secretion and signal transduction. It is currently thought that functional membrane microdomains act as oligomerization platforms and promote efficient oligomerization of interacting protein partners in bacterial membranes. In this review, we highlight the most noteworthy achievements, challenges and controversies of this emerging research field over the past five years.

Introduction

The integrity of a cell depends on the organization of its limiting membrane, although the mechanisms involved in membrane organization are far from being understood. The pioneering fluid mosaic model suggested that membrane constituents diffuse freely and are thus homogeneously distributed[1]. Recent advances in the field nonetheless demonstrated that biological membranes have a variety of lipid species that tend to segregate laterally into discrete regions, as well as proteins that concentrate preferentially in specific membrane domains[2].

Although the principle of lateral organization of biological membranes might be anticipated to apply in equal measure to eukaryotic and prokaryotic membranes, the existence of submicrometric lipid domains is described mostly in eukaryotes, and was long thought unlikely to occur in prokaryotes[3]. For instance, a landmark in eukaryotic membrane organization is the presence of lipid rafts. Eukaryotic cells organize a number of proteins related to signal transduction and membrane trafficking into discrete cholesterol- and sphingolipid-enriched microdomains, or rafts, whose integrity is central to correct function of these proteins[4]. Protein association with rafts is related to protein affinity for specific lipids[2] and the scaffold activity of the flotillin protein[5]. As flotillin becomes concentrated in lipid rafts, it recruits other proteins and facilitates interaction among them[6]. Lack of flotillin thus compromises many lipid raft-associated cell processes [710] and is associated with severe conditions such as Parkinson’s or Alzheimer’s diseases[11].

Lipid rafts were originally associated exclusively with eukaryotic cells, because their assembly requires aggregation of membrane cholesterol, absent in many prokaryotic membranes. In addition, compartmentalization of cell processes (e.g., organelle formation) to optimize metabolic reactions is a phenomenon found largely in eukaryotic cells, but generally absent in microbes (with exceptions such as bacterial carboxysomes or magnetosomes[12,13]). It is thus assumed that bacteria do not need subcellular compartmentalization to organize their cellular processes correctly[14,15]. Bacteria nonetheless compartmentalize cell processes in membrane regions termed functional membrane microdomains (FMM)[16], which concentrate proteins associated with signal transduction (sensor kinases)[1618], membrane trafficking (protein secretion systems)[1921] and metabolism regulation (AAA+ protease complexes)[19,22,23] in close proximity, thus increasing the likelihood of interaction and the efficiency of related cell processes.

FMM were originally discovered in studies of regulation of biofilm formation by the Bacillus subtilis membrane-associated sensor kinase KinC. KinC lost function in the ΔyisP mutant, which is defective for production of farnesol and probably other membrane-associated polyisoprenoid lipids; this mutant also loses its characteristic KinC focal localization[16]. These membrane regions can be purified because they resist detergent solubilization, resulting in larger fragments that can be separated in a sucrose gradient. The detergent-resistant membrane fraction (DRM) contains KinC as well as signaling proteins and the flotillin-homolog proteins FloT and FloA. Fluorescent microscopy showed that FloT, FloA and KinC colocalize in discrete membrane regions[16,21], and this colocalization is disturbed in ΔyisP cells.

Controversies in the field of FMM

YisP is necessary for the production of certain membrane-related polyisoprenoid constituent lipids of FMM[16]. Characterization of YisP suggested that, similar to other squalene synthases, this enzyme catalyzes the condensation of two farnesyl pyrophosphate molecules, probably into squalene, with release of inorganic phosphate[24]. Further studies did not detect squalene, which suggested that YisP catalyzes only dephosphorylation of farnesyl pyrophosphate; this would yield farnesol as the reaction product rather than squalene[25].

KinC activity is reduced in the absence of FloA and FloT[16]. A recent report nonetheless shows that activation of KinC can occur in B. subtilis cells lacking FloA and FloT[26], although there are marked experimental differences that prevent direct comparison of the two studies[27]. Independent laboratories used pull-down analyses, bacterial two-hybrid analyses and BN-PAGE coupled to immunoblotting to show that FloA and FloT interact physically and with other FMM-associated proteins[17,19]. In another recent publication, fluorescence microscopy detected reduced colocalization between these proteins[28]. Evidence from various studies does not come to a conclusive agreement on the functional relationships between flotillins, lipid modification enzymes, and KinC.

Structural organization of FMM

Because they share similar molecular constituents, FMM organization could resemble that of eukaryotic lipid rafts, Even so, the biological role of FMM and lipid rafts could nonetheless be different, and it is possible that they are two different types of membrane microdomains with different biological functions[29,30] (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Structural similarities and differences between lipid rafts and functional membrane microdomains.

Figure 1

Scheme of the molecular organization of lipid rafts (LR) (A) and functional membrane microdomains (FMM) (B). The architecture of these two membrane microdomains shows a number of similarities and certain structural differences. For instance, proteins associate with LR using different molecular mechanisms than those associated with FMM. Most FMM proteins are multimeric complexes, whereas LR can contain monomeric proteins. The nature of the FMM constituent lipids represented in this figure is speculative, based on current working hypotheses. LR are composed of cholesterol and sphingolipids, and FMM are probably enriched in farnesol, hopanoids and other polyisoprenoid lipids.

Lipids

Genetic and biochemical studies in B. subtilis pointed to farnesol and/or farnesol-derived polyisoprenoid lipids as constituent lipids of FMM[25]. Although other lipids are likely to participate in FMM assembly, we lack a precise notion of their molecular structure, which probably varies from one species to another. For example, a number of bacterial species produce cyclic polyisoprenoid lipids termed hopanoids, which are structurally similar to eukaryotic cholesterol (sporulenes in B. subtilis[31,32]); they organize in microdomains in certain bacterial species, such as the Methylobacterium extorquens outer membrane microdomains[3336]. In Gram-negative and -positive bacteria, hopanoids are important for membrane integrity and adaptation to stress conditions, signal transduction and cell division [31,3740]. Hopanoids play a role in guiding cell division in Rhodopseudomonas palustris, and their mislocalization leads to growth defects in this bacterium[41]. Non-cyclic polyisoprenoid membrane lipids like carotenoids have analogous chemical properties to hopanoids[42] and also regulate bacterial membrane rigidity[4245]. Many bacterial species produce non-cyclic polyisoprenoid lipids[29,46]. Some Bacillus produce carotenoids[47], and a carotenoid-deficient Staphylococcus aureus mutant shows mislocalization of flotillin and FMM-related proteins[16], which suggest a structural role for carotenoids in FMM assembly. Hopanoids and carotenoids have a more hydrophobic molecular structure than amphipathic phospholipids. The hydrophobic region of phospholipids contains two long, flexible fatty acid chains whereas hopanoids have a rigid, planar hydrophobic region of several aromatic rings that could help stabilize FMM in bacteria[29,46].

Flotillins

Flotillin proteins were initially identified as scaffold proteins in eukaryotic lipid rafts, in which they appear to recruit other proteins that must be in lipid rafts to interact. Eukaryotic lipid rafts have two flotillin homologs to each other, FLO-1 and FLO-2, which associate with each other in hetero-oligomers[8,9,48,49]. The FLO-1 and FLO-2 N-terminal regions anchor to membrane rafts via myristoyl and palmitoyl lipid moieties, respectively[50]. FLO-1 and FLO-2 have a prohibitin (PHB) domain (also termed the SPFH domain), part of a larger protein family known as the SPFH family (stomatin, prohibitin, flotillin and HflK/C)[51,52], which is necessary for flotillin function, although its precise role is unknown[51,52]. The C-terminal, a coil-coiled region with several glutamine–alanine repeats[53,54], participates in flotillin oligomerization[50]. Bacterial flotillins are structurally similar to those of eukaryotes, except that bacterial flotillins associate with FMM via an N-terminal hairpin loop[55]. Flotillin-encoding genes are found in most bacterial genomes[29]; the flotilin gene is usually the second gene of an operon in which the first gene encodes a NfeD-homolog protein. NfeD interacts physically with flotillin in bacteria and archaea[56]. The third gene of the operon shows no homologies and is absent in some species.

One important role of bacterial flotillins is regulation of membrane fluidity[19]. Lack of flotillin leads to coalescence of distinct domains of high membrane order and reduces the heterogeneity of membrane lipid types. [19]. Another flotillin role is to facilitate efficient protein complex assembly, which is probably why flotillin perturbation affects the function of FMM-associated signal transduction pathways[5,54,57]. Flotillin scaffold activity stabilizes protein complexes by tethering interacting partners and increasing the likelihood of interaction[58]. Protein-protein interaction experiments show that flotillin promotes efficient homodimerization of FMM-associated sensor kinases, such as KinC and KinD, which regulate biofilm formation in B. subtilis[18], as well as ResE and PhoR kinases that respectively regulate antibiotic production and cell wall turnover in B. subtilis[17,18]. A third role of the scaffold flotillins is to prevent non-specific protein aggregation and guide protein assembly into productive complexes[59], e.g., FloT promotes KinC interaction specificity and KinC confinement in FMM prevents its non-specific aggregation with other sensor kinases that are not part of the FMM protein cargo, such as KinB[17,18].

Functional protein cargo

DRM composition has been analyzed in B. subtilis[16], S. aureus[16] and Borrelia burgdorferi[60]. Fluorescence microscopy and pull-down experiments show interaction of DRM-associated proteins with flotillin and confirm these proteins as bona fide FMM-associated proteins. A common feature of these FMM-associated proteins is their multimeric nature (Table 1), as is the case of the FtsH protease complex[61], the Sec protein secretion machinery[62] and several ABC transporters[63]; this is consistent with the idea that FMM catalyzes efficient protein–protein interactions and complex assembly. Flotillin-defective B. subtilis mutants show altered oligomerization of several sensor kinases (e.g., PhoR, ResE and KinC) and thus, inhibited signaling transduction cascades[16,24]. In addition, the multimeric protease FtsH and the Sec protein secretion machinery interact physically with flotillins in B. subtilis in an interaction important for their respective protease and protein secretion activities[22,23,55] (Fig. 2).

Table 1. Most-represented FMM-associated proteins in several bacterial species.

Bacillus subtilis Staphylococcus aureus Borrelia burgdorferi
Name Function Name Function Name Function
FloA Scaffold protein FloA Scaffold protein HflK Scaffold protein
FloT Scaffold protein Rny RNA degradation HflC Scaffold protein
KinC Sensor kinase FtsH AAA-protease HtrA Serine protease
PhoR Sensor kinase EbpS Cell adhesion FtsH AAA-protease
ResE Sensor kinase WalK Sensor kinase SecD Protein secretion
SecY Protein secretion SecA Protein secretion FlaA,B Flagellar filament
FtsH AAA-protease TcaA Antibiotic resistance FlgE Flagellar hook
PrsA Protein secretion PrsA Protein secretion P83/100 Virulence
TagU Cell wall metabolism KdpB,C,A K+ transporter OspA,B Gut colonization
PBP1A Cell wall metabolism SirB ABC transporter Mcp-2 Chemotaxis
McpA,B,C Chemotaxis SA1909-11 ATP synthase
AtpD,G ATP synthase Sip1B Protein secretion
QoxA Energy metabolism SA1283 Cell wall metabolism
SdhA Succinate dehydrog.
OppA Peptide transport
OpuAC Peptide transport
FhuD Siderophore uptake

Figure 2. The scaffold activity of flotillin tethers interaction partners and increases the efficiency of biochemical reactions.

Figure 2

(A) Flotillin stabilizes interacting partners. The scaffold activity of flotillin benefits biochemical reactions and prevents the formation of non-specific aggregates. (B) The scaffold activity of flotillin protein has certain limitations. A low flotillin concentration does not promote efficient interaction of protein partners. A medium flotillin concentration is optimal for oligomerization of interacting partners. High flotillin concentration might titrate protein components away from each other and thus reduce efficient activation of the biochemical reaction. Adapted from Good et al. [58].

It would be of interest to determine how a particular pool of proteins associates with FMM to the exclusion of other membrane proteins. Lipid–protein interactions probably have a role, similar to the glycosylphosphatidylinositol proteins associated with lipid rafts in eukaryotic cells[64] (Fig. 1). Although this type of post-translational modification is not described in prokaryotes, the association of protein cargo with FMM is likely to rely on molecular mechanisms yet to be described.

Molecular approaches to the study of FMM

FMM are compact hydrophobic membrane platforms, making them relatively resistant to disruption by detergent treatment. Detergent insoluble fragments can be separated in a sucrose gradient and analyzed independently[65]. Although this technique is an excellent starting point from which to produce a fraction enriched in FMM proteins, it should not be assumed that any protein associated with the DRM fraction equates to a FMM protein[66]. Additional experiments, such as protein-protein interaction analyses with flotillin, are necessary to test whether a DRM protein is part of the FMM. New high-resolution microscopy techniques such as STED, SIM, PALM and dSTORM are becoming very useful for elucidating the structure and function of nanoscopic assemblies within living cells. Combining these approaches with new dyes allows precise description of the physicochemical properties of membrane microdomains. The dye C-laurdan distributes evenly into cell membranes, but alters its emission spectra in response to hydrophobic changes, with a blue-shift emission spectrum in extreme hydrophobic environments such as lipid rafts, and a red-shift spectrum in the phospholipid membrane[19,6770]. Despite remarkable progress in the methods used to study membrane microdomains, we still lack robust quantitative lipid profiling approaches that precisely identify and describe the constituent lipids of FMM. Technological advances in lipid identification and profiling have nonetheless increased in recent years[71] and we are optimistic that these questions will be resolved in the near future.

Biological significance of FMM

Gram-positive bacteria

B. subtilis was the first bacterial system in which FMM’s were studied. In this organism, FMM’s are known to promote interactions among a diverse group of effector proteins that include sensor kinase and FtsH[72,73]. Efficient FtsH oligomerization in B. subtilis requires FloA and FloT scaffold activity[23]. As a result, flotillin-defective mutants show reduced FtsH activity[23], and FtsH-related cell processes such as biofilm formation and sporulation are impaired[72,74]. B. subtilis was also the subject organism in studies that demonstrated the association of the Sec secretion system with FMM[19]. Pull-down assays indicate that the channel subunit SecY and the signal peptidase SppA interact physically with FloT[19], consistent with the defect in Sec-mediated protein secretion detected in flotillin-defective mutants[22,23,55]. It was recently suggested that a heterogeneous FMM population coexists in B. subtilis cell membranes[17]. Uneven FloA and FloT distribution diversified two FMM subpopulations, one containing only FloA and another with both FloA and FloT. Blue native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (BN-PAGE) coupled to immunoblot experiments show that FloA-containing FMM are enriched in proteins associated with cell wall turnover (e.g., PhoR sensor kinase), and cell wall turnover is thus partly affected in the ΔfloA mutant. In contrast, FloA/FloT-containing FMM are enriched in stationary phase-related proteins (e.g., ResE sensor kinase), and mutants lacking FloT are thus partly affected in their adaptation to oxygen-limiting conditions, siderophores and antibiotics production. It is possible that temporal and/or spatial diversification of FMMs regulates mechanisms that bring about temporal and/or spatial control of signal transduction and other cellular processes in bacteria[75,76].

Ongoing research is exploring FMM in distinct bacterial species. FMM have been shown in the pathogen B. anthracis[77]. Although this species appears to lack a FloA homolog, it does express FlotP, a FloT homolog whose structure and subcellular distribution resemble that of B. subtilis FloT (~65% identity). FlotP expression and subcellular localization were altered in mutant cells with perturbed membrane lipid production. Alteration of FlotP distribution was concomitant with increased membrane fluidity and decreased toxin secretion. FMM organization in other gram-positive pathogens, such as S. aureus or Mycobacterium tuberculosis, is also under investigation. Staphylococcus aureus expresses a flotillin protein similar to B. subtilis FloA (~90% identity). In M. tuberculosis, indirect analyses show an intriguing correlation between FMM protein content and extracellular vesicles[78]. Mycobacterium tuberculosis flotillin (Rv1488 protein) is highly concentrated in extracellular vesicles, with other FMM-associated proteins such as the Sec machinery, ABC transporters and enolase[78]. Flotillin from M. tuberculosis is strongly immunoreactive, a feature probably associated with the role of extracellular vesicles in host-pathogen interactions, and might thus be a good marker for M. tuberculosis immunodiagnosis[79]. Consistent with this, M. tuberculosis flotillin is an epitope for T cell recognition and activation of an adaptive antibody response in tuberculosis patients[80].

Gram-negative bacteria

Gram-negative bacteria are appealing models for the study of FMM, as their cell envelope has an inner and an outer cell membrane. In its outer membrane, Methylobacterium extorquens organizes microdomains constituted by hopanoid aggregation and interaction with lipid A[33]. Alteration of hopanoid production causes a defect in multidrug efflux pumps and generates greater antibiotic sensitivity. DRM-associated proteins of the pathogen B. burgdorferi, such as OspB, OspA, and P66, are likewise outer membrane lipoproteins needed to maintain cell morphology and membrane permeability in this bacterium[60,81,82]. Ultrastructural analyses confirmed assembly in the B. burgorferi outer membrane of microdomains enriched in cholesterol and OspB, OspA, and P66[82].

Another interesting line of FMM research is being developed in the pathogen Campylobacter jejuni, which invades intestinal epithelial cells and causes infectious gastroenteritis. A transposon mutagenesis screen identified a flotillin-defective mutant that is unable to adhere to and be internalized by epithelial cells, resulting in impaired virulence [83]. In vivo experiments in a murine infection model showed that the flotillin-defective mutant did not develop campylobacteriosis[84]. An independent study identified flotillin as a component of the C. jejuni flagellar systems, which suggested that flagellum structure was partly compromised in the absence of flotillin; immunoprecipitation analyses showed that flotillin interacts with components of the flagellar system[85]. These results are consistent with the current hypothesis that flotillins act as scaffold proteins for efficient multiprotein complex assembly in FMM, and could explain the virulence defect of the flotillin-deficient mutant, since non-motile C. jejuni mutants show an acute decrease in cell-invasive ability[8688].

In the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp., flotillin oligomerizes in the cellular and thylakoid membranes and has a role in assembly of the photosynthetic apparatus. Motility is impaired in a flotillin-truncated mutant, but no effect was detected in the photosystem complex[89]. Further studies using a flotillin deletion mutant showed a severe defect in thylakoid biogenesis and structural integrity[90]. In this mutant, defective thylakoids are smaller and lack typical internal membrane structure. Defective thylakoids showed decreased chlorophyll density and, although photosynthetic efficiency was unaffected, mutant viability was light intensity-dependent[90].

Archaea

The flotillin core domain (residues 56-234) resolved by NMR from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus horikoshii shows considerable similarity to eukaryotic flotillins[91,92]. Moreover, flotillin and its operon protein partner NfeD have been resolved as oligomerzs[93]. Archaeon NfeD has an oligosaccharide/oligonucleotide-binding fold (OB-fold) domain that lacks residues found to be critical for its OB-fold activity in eukaryotic NfeD. This protein could thus play a role in binding small molecules or ligands that might regulate the activity of spatially proximal proteins[94].

Conclusions

The existence of FMM in bacteria demonstrates programs of membrane compartmentalization in prokaryotes, comparable in their sophistication to those of their eukaryotic counterparts. Indeed, FMM and lipid rafts might be two structurally related membrane platforms with distinct biological roles. The FMM appears to facilitate efficient oligomerization of FMM-associated protein complexes (i.e., oligomerization factories), whereas lipid rafts specifically harbor proteins associated with signal transduction and membrane trafficking. Outstanding questions nonetheless remain unanswered, such as how flotillin scaffold activity influences interacting protein partners, how lipids organize in membrane microdomains, and the relevance of these domains for cell physiology. New and interesting contributions to this growing field will emerge in coming years and help to clarify the importance of FMM in bacterial physiology.

Highlights.

  • Functional membrane microdomains promote efficient oligomerization of protein partners

  • They form by colocalization of specific lipids and scaffold proteins termed flotillins

  • These domains are found in Gram-positive and -negative bacteria, and also archea

  • Membrane microdomain integrity is important for associated oligomer activity

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by ERC Starting Grant ERC335568 (European Union) and BFU2014-55601-P (MINECO, Spain) to DL.

References

(*) Papers of special interest

(**) Papers of outstanding interest

  • 1.Singer SJ, Nicolson GL. The fluid mosaic model of the structure of cell membranes. Science. 1972;175:720–731. doi: 10.1126/science.175.4023.720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Levental I, Lingwood D, Grzybek M, Coskun U, Simons K. Palmitoylation regulates raft affinity for the majority of integral raft proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:22050–22054. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016184107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yeagle PL. The Structure of Biological Membranes. CRC Press; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Simons K, Ikonen E. Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature. 1997;387:569–572. doi: 10.1038/42408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lang DM, Lommel S, Jung M, Ankerhold R, Petrausch B, Laessing U, Wiechers MF, Plattner H, Stuermer CA. Identification of reggie-1 and reggie-2 as plasmamembrane-associated proteins which cocluster with activated GPI-anchored cell adhesion molecules in non-caveolar micropatches in neurons. J Neurobiol. 1998;37:502–523. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4695(199812)37:4<502::aid-neu2>3.0.co;2-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Browman DT, Hoegg MB, Robbins SM. The SPFH domain-containing proteins: more than lipid raft markers. Trends Cell Biol. 2007;17:394–402. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2007.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Morrow IC, Parton RG. Flotillins and the PHB domain protein family: rafts, worms and anaesthetics. Traffic. 2005;6:725–740. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2005.00318.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Otto GP, Nichols BJ. The roles of flotillin microdomains--endocytosis and beyond. J Cell Sci. 2011;124:3933–3940. doi: 10.1242/jcs.092015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Stuermer CA. The reggie/flotillin connection to growth. Trends Cell Biol. 2010;20:6–13. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2009.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Stuermer CA. Reggie/flotillin and the targeted delivery of cargo. J Neurochem. 2011;116:708–713. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.07007.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Michel V, Bakovic M. Lipid rafts in health and disease. Biol Cell. 2007;99:129–140. doi: 10.1042/BC20060051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shively JM, Ball F, Brown DH, Saunders RE. Functional organelles in prokaryotes: polyhedral inclusions (carboxysomes) of Thiobacillus neapolitanus. Science. 1973;182:584–586. doi: 10.1126/science.182.4112.584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ofer S, Nowik I, Bauminger ER, Papaefthymiou GC, Frankel RB, Blakemore RP. Magnetosome dynamics in magnetotactic bacteria. Biophys J. 1984;46:57–64. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)83998-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Diekmann Y, Pereira-Leal JB. Evolution of intracellular compartmentalization. Biochem J. 2013;449:319–331. doi: 10.1042/BJ20120957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gabaldon T, Pittis AA. Origin and evolution of metabolic sub-cellular compartmentalization in eukaryotes. Biochimie. 2015;119:262–268. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2015.03.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lopez D, Kolter R. Functional microdomains in bacterial membranes. Genes Dev. 2010;24:1893–1902. doi: 10.1101/gad.1945010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schneider J, Klein T, Mielich-Suss B, Koch G, Franke C, Kuipers OP, Kovacs AT, Sauer M, Lopez D. Spatio-temporal remodeling of functional membrane microdomains organizes the signaling networks of a bacterium. PLoS Genet. 2015;11:e1005140. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005140. [This report uses a combination of cell and molecular biology approaches to demonstrate the coexistence of two FMM subpopulations in the membrane of B. subtilis cells. The two FMM types harbor different protein cargos and regulate distinct cell processes.] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Schneider J, Mielich-Suss B, Bohme R, Lopez D. In vivo characterization of the scaffold activity of flotillin on the membrane kinase KinC of Bacillus subtilis. Microbiology. 2015;161:1871–1887. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bach JN, Bramkamp M. Flotillins functionally organize the bacterial membrane. Mol Microbiol. 2013;88:1205–1217. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dempwolff F, Moller HM, Graumann PL. Synthetic motility and cell shape defects associated with deletions of flotillin/reggie paralogs in Bacillus subtilis and interplay of these proteins with NfeD proteins. J Bacteriol. 2012;194:4652–4661. doi: 10.1128/JB.00910-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Donovan C, Bramkamp M. Characterization and subcellular localization of a bacterial flotillin homologue. Microbiology. 2009;155:1786–1799. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.025312-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mielich-Suss B, Schneider J, Lopez D. Overproduction of flotillin influences cell differentiation and shape in Bacillus subtilis. MBio. 2013;4:e00719–00713. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00719-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yepes A, Schneider J, Mielich B, Koch G, Garcia-Betancur JC, Ramamurthi KS, Vlamakis H, Lopez D. The biofilm formation defect of a Bacillus subtilis flotillin-defective mutant involves the protease FtsH. Mol Microbiol. 2012;86:457–471. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08205.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lee S, Poulter CD. Cloning, solubilization, and characterization of squalene synthase from Thermosynechococcus elongatus BP-1. J Bacteriol. 2008;190:3808–3816. doi: 10.1128/JB.01939-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Feng X, Hu Y, Zheng Y, Zhu W, Li K, Huang CH, Ko TP, Ren F, Chan HC, Nega M, et al. Structural and functional analysis of Bacillus subtilis YisP reveals a role of its product in biofilm production. Chem Biol. 2014;21:1557–1563. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.08.018. [In this report, the authors test YisP activity in vitro and detect pyrophosphatase activity from the farnesyl-pyrophosphate substrate. They did not detect squalene production.] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Devi SN, Vishnoi M, Kiehler B, Haggett L, Fujita M. In vivo functional characterization of the transmembrane histidine kinase KinC in Bacillus subtilis. Microbiology. 2015;161:1092–1104. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lopez D. Connection of KinC to flotillins and potassium leakage in Bacillus subtilis. Microbiology. 2015;161:1180–1181. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dempwolff F, Schmidt FK, Hervas AB, Stroh A, Rosch TC, Riese CN, Dersch S, Heimerl T, Lucena D, Hulsbusch N, et al. Super Resolution Fluorescence Microscopy and Tracking of Bacterial Flotillin (Reggie) Paralogs Provide Evidence for Defined-Sized Protein Microdomains within the Bacterial Membrane but Absence of Clusters Containing Detergent-Resistant Proteins. PLoS Genet. 2016;12:e1006116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bramkamp M, Lopez D. Exploring the Existence of Lipid Rafts in Bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2015;79:81–100. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00036-14. [This review article compiles important advances in the field of FMM, with particular emphasis on research using the model organism Bacillus subtilis.] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lopez D. Molecular composition of functional microdomains in bacterial membranes. Chem Phys Lipids. 2015;192:3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2015.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bosak T, Losick RM, Pearson A. A polycyclic terpenoid that alleviates oxidative stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:6725–6729. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0800199105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kontnik R, Bosak T, Butcher RA, Brocks JJ, Losick R, Clardy J, Pearson A. Sporulenes, heptaprenyl metabolites from Bacillus subtilis spores. Org Lett. 2008;10:3551–3554. doi: 10.1021/ol801314k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Saenz JP, Grosser D, Bradley AS, Lagny TJ, Lavrynenko O, Broda M, Simons K. Hopanoids as functional analogues of cholesterol in bacterial membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:11971–11976. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1515607112. [This study uses several molecular biology approaches to demonstrate that hopanoids organize in microdomains in the outer membrane of a gram-negative bacterium and help to stabilize a number of membrane proteins associated with antibiotic resistance. It is thus an important paper that describes FMM in Gram-negative bacteria.] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Doughty DM, Dieterle M, Sessions AL, Fischer WW, Newman DK. Probing the subcellular localization of hopanoid lipids in bacteria using NanoSIMS. PLoS One. 2014;9:e84455. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084455. [Here the authors describe a new technique to visualize membrane microdomains using fluorescence microscopy, an example of the notable advances in the field of fluorescence microscopy for membrane microdomain detection.] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Saenz JP, Sezgin E, Schwille P, Simons K. Functional convergence of hopanoids and sterols in membrane ordering. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:14236–14240. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212141109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Welander PV, Hunter RC, Zhang L, Sessions AL, Summons RE, Newman DK. Hopanoids play a role in membrane integrity and pH homeostasis in Rhodopseudomonas palustris TIE-1. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:6145–6156. doi: 10.1128/JB.00460-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kannenberg E, Poralla K. The influence of hopanoids on growth of Mycoplasma mycoides. Arch Microbiol. 1982;133:100–102. doi: 10.1007/BF00413519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Moreau RA, Agnew J, Hicks KB, Powell MJ. Modulation of lipoxygenase activity by bacterial hopanoids. J Nat Prod. 1997;60:397–398. doi: 10.1021/np960611y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Poralla K, Muth G, Hartner T. Hopanoids are formed during transition from substrate to aerial hyphae in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000;189:93–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09212.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Seipke RF, Loria R. Hopanoids are not essential for growth of Streptomyces scabies 87-22. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:5216–5223. doi: 10.1128/JB.00390-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Doughty DM, Coleman ML, Hunter RC, Sessions AL, Summons RE, Newman DK. The RND-family transporter, HpnN, is required for hopanoid localization to the outer membrane of Rhodopseudomonas palustris TIE-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:E1045–1051. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1104209108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Taylor RF. Bacterial triterpenoids. Microbiol Rev. 1984;48:181–198. doi: 10.1128/mr.48.3.181-198.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cvetkovic D, Fiedor L, Wisniewska-Becker A, Markovic D. Organization of Carotenoids in Models of Biological Membranes: Current Status of Knowledge and Research. Current Analytical Chemistry. 2013;9:1573–4110. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Dworkin M. Function of carotenoids in photosynthetic bacteria. Nature. 1959;184(Suppl 24):1891–1892. doi: 10.1038/1841891b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Subczynski WK, Wisniewska-Becker A, Widomska J. Can macular xanthophylls replace cholesterol in formation of the liquid-ordered phase in lipid-bilayer membranes? Acta Biochim Pol. 2012;59:109–114. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sohlenkamp C, Geiger O. Bacterial membrane lipids: diversity in structures and pathways. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2016;40:133–159. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuv008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Khaneja R, Perez-Fons L, Fakhry S, Baccigalupi L, Steiger S, To E, Sandmann G, Dong TC, Ricca E, Fraser PD, et al. Carotenoids found in Bacillus. J Appl Microbiol. 2010;108:1889–1902. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04590.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Babuke T, Tikkanen R. Dissecting the molecular function of reggie/flotillin proteins. Eur J Cell Biol. 2007;86:525–532. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2007.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zhao F, Zhang J, Liu YS, Li L, He YL. Research advances on flotillins. Virol J. 2011;8:479. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-8-479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Neumann-Giesen C, Falkenbach B, Beicht P, Claasen S, Luers G, Stuermer CA, Herzog V, Tikkanen R. Membrane and raft association of reggie-1/flotillin-2: role of myristoylation, palmitoylation and oligomerization and induction of filopodia by overexpression. Biochem J. 2004;378:509–518. doi: 10.1042/BJ20031100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Tavernarakis N, Driscoll M, Kyrpides NC. The SPFH domain: implicated in regulating targeted protein turnover in stomatins and other membrane-associated proteins. Trends Biochem Sci. 1999;24:425–427. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(99)01467-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Rivera-Milla E, Stuermer CA, Malaga-Trillo E. Ancient origin of reggie (flotillin), reggie-like, and other lipid-raft proteins: convergent evolution of the SPFH domain. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2006;63:343–357. doi: 10.1007/s00018-005-5434-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Langhorst MF, Reuter A, Stuermer CA. Scaffolding microdomains and beyond: the function of reggie/flotillin proteins. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2005;62:2228–2240. doi: 10.1007/s00018-005-5166-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bickel PE, Scherer PE, Schnitzer JE, Oh P, Lisanti MP, Lodish HF. Flotillin and epidermal surface antigen define a new family of caveolae-associated integral membrane proteins. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:13793–13802. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.21.13793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bach JN, Bramkamp M. Dissecting the molecular properties of prokaryotic flotillins. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0116750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Yokoyama H, Matsui I. A novel thermostable membrane protease forming an operon with a stomatin homolog from the hyperthermophilic archaebacterium Pyrococcus horikoshii. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:6588–6594. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M411748200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Dermine JF, Duclos S, Garin J, St-Louis F, Rea S, Parton RG, Desjardins M. Flotillin-1-enriched lipid raft domains accumulate on maturing phagosomes. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:18507–18512. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M101113200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Good MC, Zalatan JG, Lim WA. Scaffold proteins: hubs for controlling the flow of cellular information. Science. 2011;332:680–686. doi: 10.1126/science.1198701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Daley DO. The assembly of membrane proteins into complexes. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2008;18:420–424. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2008.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Toledo A, Perez A, Coleman JL, Benach JL. The lipid raft proteome of Borrelia burgdorferi . Proteomics. 2015;15:3662–3675. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201500093. [This report describes the protein content of the Borrelia burgdorferi DRM fraction and shows similarities to that of DRM fractions from other bacterial species.] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Akiyama Y, Yoshihisa T, Ito K. FtsH, a membrane-bound ATPase, forms a complex in the cytoplasmic membrane of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:23485–23490. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.40.23485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Brundage L, Hendrick JP, Schiebel E, Driessen AJ, Wickner W. The purified E. coli integral membrane protein SecY/E is sufficient for reconstitution of SecA-dependent precursor protein translocation. Cell. 1990;62:649–657. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90111-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Davidson AL, Dassa E, Orelle C, Chen J. Structure, function, and evolution of bacterial ATP-binding cassette systems. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2008;72:317–364. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00031-07. table of contents. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Lorent JH, Levental I. Structural determinants of protein partitioning into ordered membrane domains and lipid rafts. Chem Phys Lipids. 2015;192:23–32. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2015.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Brown DA. Isolation and use of rafts. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2002;Chapter 11:Unit 11 10. doi: 10.1002/0471142735.im1110s51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Simons K, Gerl MJ. Revitalizing membrane rafts: new tools and insights. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11:688–699. doi: 10.1038/nrm2977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Dinic J, Biverstahl H, Maler L, Parmryd I. Laurdan and di-4-ANEPPDHQ do not respond to membrane-inserted peptides and are good probes for lipid packing. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1808:298–306. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2010.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Gaus K, Zech T, Harder T. Visualizing membrane microdomains by Laurdan 2-photon microscopy. Mol Membr Biol. 2006;23:41–48. doi: 10.1080/09687860500466857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kaiser HJ, Lingwood D, Levental I, Sampaio JL, Kalvodova L, Rajendran L, Simons K. Order of lipid phases in model and plasma membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:16645–16650. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908987106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Parasassi T, Gratton E, Yu WM, Wilson P, Levi M. Two-photon fluorescence microscopy of laurdan generalized polarization domains in model and natural membranes. Biophys J. 1997;72:2413–2429. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78887-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Saliba AE, Vonkova I, Deghou S, Ceschia S, Tischer C, Kugler KG, Bork P, Ellenberg J, Gavin AC. A protocol for the systematic and quantitative measurement of protein-lipid interactions using the liposome-microarray-based assay. Nat Protoc. 2016;11:1021–1038. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.059. [Here the authors describe cutting-edge approaches for research on lipid-protein interactions. The field of lipid interactions is currently experiencing major advances, and this publication is a clear example of the state of the art in this field.] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Lysenko E, Ogura T, Cutting SM. Characterization of the ftsH gene of Bacillus subtilis. Microbiology. 1997;143(Pt 3):971–978. doi: 10.1099/00221287-143-3-971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Bieniossek C, Schalch T, Bumann M, Meister M, Meier R, Baumann U. The molecular architecture of the metalloprotease FtsH. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:3066–3071. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600031103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Zellmeier S, Zuber U, Schumann W, Wiegert T. The absence of FtsH metalloprotease activity causes overexpression of the sigmaW-controlled pbpE gene, resulting in filamentous growth of Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2003;185:973–982. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.3.973-982.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Mishra S, Joshi PG. Lipid raft heterogeneity: an enigma. J Neurochem. 2007;103(Suppl 1):135–142. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04720.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Neumann AK, Itano MS, Jacobson K. Understanding lipid rafts and other related membrane domains. F1000 Biol Rep. 2010;2:31. doi: 10.3410/B2-31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Somani VK, Aggarwal S, Singh D, Prasad T, Bhatnagar R. Identification of Novel Raft Marker Protein, FlotP in Bacillus anthracis. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:169. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00169. [Molecular and cell biology techniques are combined to show FMM in the pathogen Bacillus anthracis and identify similarities between B. anthracis and B. subtilis flotillins.] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Lee J, Kim SH, Choi DS, Lee JS, Kim DK, Go G, Park SM, Kim SH, Shin JH, Chang CL, et al. Proteomic analysis of extracellular vesicles derived from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proteomics. 2015;15:3331–3337. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201500037. [Here a proteomic approach is used to characterize the proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis extracellular vesicles. The protein pool is similar to that of FMM, and flotillin is an important marker of the protein content of these vesicles.] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Ben Amor Y, Shashkina E, Johnson S, Bifani PJ, Kurepina N, Kreiswirth B, Bhattacharya S, Spencer J, Rendon A, Catanzaro A, et al. Immunological characterization of novel secreted antigens of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Scand J Immunol. 2005;61:139–146. doi: 10.1111/j.0300-9475.2005.01557.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Vani J, Shaila MS, Chandra NR, Nayak R. A combined immuno-informatics and structure-based modeling approach for prediction of T cell epitopes of secretory proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microbes Infect. 2006;8:738–746. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2005.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.LaRocca TJ, Crowley JT, Cusack BJ, Pathak P, Benach J, London E, Garcia-Monco JC, Benach JL. Cholesterol lipids of Borrelia burgdorferi form lipid rafts and are required for the bactericidal activity of a complement-independent antibody. Cell Host Microbe. 2010;8:331–342. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2010.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.LaRocca TJ, Pathak P, Chiantia S, Toledo A, Silvius JR, Benach JL, London E. Proving lipid rafts exist: membrane domains in the prokaryote Borrelia burgdorferi have the same properties as eukaryotic lipid rafts. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003353. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Tareen AM, Luder CG, Zautner AE, Grobeta U, Heimesaat MM, Bereswill S, Lugert R. The Campylobacter jejuni Cj0268c protein is required for adhesion and invasion in vitro. PLoS One. 2013;8:e81069. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Heimesaat MM, Lugert R, Fischer A, Alutis M, Kuhl AA, Zautner AE, Tareen AM, Gobel UB, Bereswill S. Impact of Campylobacter jejuni cj0268c knockout mutation on intestinal colonization, translocation, and induction of immunopathology in gnotobiotic IL-10 deficient mice. PLoS One. 2014;9:e90148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090148. [This study uses an infection biology approach to show that the flotillin-defective strain of Campylobacter jejuni has an attenuated infection phenotype.] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Gao B, Lara-Tejero M, Lefebre M, Goodman AL, Galan JE. Novel components of the flagellar system in epsilonproteobacteria. MBio. 2014;5:e01349–01314. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01349-14. [In this paper, a flotillin-deficient mutant in Campylobacter jejuni is shown to be partly defective in flagellar system assembly. This defect might cause the attenuated phenoytpe in virulence, as this bacterium requires the flagellum for infectious activity.] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Grant CC, Konkel ME, Cieplak W, Jr, Tompkins LS. Role of flagella in adherence, internalization, and translocation of Campylobacter jejuni in nonpolarized and polarized epithelial cell cultures. Infect Immun. 1993;61:1764–1771. doi: 10.1128/iai.61.5.1764-1771.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Wassenaar TM, Bleumink-Pluym NM, van der Zeijst BA. Inactivation of Campylobacter jejuni flagellin genes by homologous recombination demonstrates that flaA but not flaB is required for invasion. EMBO J. 1991;10:2055–2061. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07736.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Yao R, Burr DH, Doig P, Trust TJ, Niu H, Guerry P. Isolation of motile and non-motile insertional mutants of Campylobacter jejuni: the role of motility in adherence and invasion of eukaryotic cells. Mol Microbiol. 1994;14:883–893. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb01324.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Boehm M, Nield J, Zhang P, Aro EM, Komenda J, Nixon PJ. Structural and mutational analysis of band 7 proteins in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:6425–6435. doi: 10.1128/JB.00644-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Bryan SJ, Burroughs NJ, Evered C, Sacharz J, Nenninger A, Mullineaux CW, Spence EM. Loss of the SPHF homologue Slr1768 leads to a catastrophic failure in the maintenance of thylakoid membranes in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. PLoS One. 2011;6:e19625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Yokoyama H, Fujii S, Matsui I. Crystal structure of a core domain of stomatin from Pyrococcus horikoshii Illustrates a novel trimeric and coiled-coil fold. J Mol Biol. 2008;376:868–878. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Yokoyama H, Takizawa N, Kobayashi D, Matsui I, Fujii S. Crystal structure of a membrane stomatin-specific protease in complex with a substrate peptide. Biochemistry. 2012;51:3872–3880. doi: 10.1021/bi300098k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Yokoyama H, Matsui E, Hiramoto K, Forterre P, Matsui I. Clustering of OB-fold domains of the partner protease complexed with trimeric stomatin from Thermococcales. Biochimie. 2013;95:1494–1501. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2013.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Kuwahara Y, Ohno A, Morii T, Yokoyama H, Matsui I, Tochio H, Shirakawa M, Hiroaki H. The solution structure of the C-terminal domain of NfeD reveals a novel membrane-anchored OB-fold. Protein Sci. 2008;17:1915–1924. doi: 10.1110/ps.034736.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES