Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: World J Biol Psychiatry. 2016 Jul 26;18(3):247–254. doi: 10.1080/15622975.2016.1208844

Manic symptom severity correlates with COMT activity in the striatum: a post-mortem study

Marco Bortolato 1,*, Consuelo Walss-Bass 2, Peter M Thompson 3, Jackob Moskovitz 4,*
PMCID: PMC5468118  NIHMSID: NIHMS854764  PMID: 27458023

Abstract

Objectives

The enzyme catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT), which catalyzes the degradation of dopamine and norepinephrine, is posited to participate in the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder (BD) and schizophrenia. In support of this notion, rich evidence has documented that the severity of various BD and schizophrenia symptoms is moderated by rs4680, a single nucleotide polymorphism of the COMT gene featuring a valine (Val)-to-methionine (Met) substitution that results in lower catalytic activity. Nevertheless, the specific relevance of COMT enzymatic activity in the pathophysiology of BD and schizophrenia dimensions remains elusive.

Methods

We measured COMT catalytic activity in post-mortem prefrontal cortices, striata and cerebella of schizophrenia and BD patients, as well as non-affected controls. These values were then correlated with rs4680 genotypes and psychopathology scores in the last week of life.

Results

No direct correlation between COMT activity and rs4680 genotypes was found; however, the severity of manic symptoms was highly correlated with COMT activity in the striatum, irrespective of the diagnostic group.

Conclusions

These results suggest that COMT striatal activity, but not rs4680 genotype, may serve as a biomarker for manic symptoms. Future studies are warranted to confirm these findings and assess the neurobiological links between COMT striatal activity and manic symptoms.

Keywords: Catechol-O-methyltransferase, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, manic symptoms, single nucleotide polymorphism

INTRODUCTION

The catecholamine neurotransmitters dopamine (DA) and norepinephrine (NE) have been extensively implicated in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder (BD) (Axelrod and Tomchik, 1958; van Kammen et al., 1991; Manji et al., 2003; Yamamoto and Hornykiewicz, 2004; Cousins et al., 2009; Howes and Kapur, 2009). In line with this idea, several lines of research have investigated the link between these psychiatric disorders and the enzyme catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT), which catalyzes the degradation of DA and NE into 3-methoxytyramine and normetanephrine, respectively (Lachman et al., 1995; Männistö and Kaakkola, 1999).

To date, most research on the role of COMT in behavioral regulation and psychopathology has focused on rs4680, a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of the COMT gene featuring a substitution of a guanine to adenine at codon 148. The resulting mutation is a valine (Val)-to-methionine (Met) transition, which leads to a significant reduction of catalytic activity in vitro (Moskovitz et al., 2015). We recently showed that the functional deficits in Met variants may be partially contributed by the sulfoxidation of this amino acid mediated by oxidative stress (Egan et al., 2001).

Several studies have suggested that the Met allele may confer slightly lower risk for schizophrenia (Kirov et al., 1998), but greater risk for mania (Goghari and Sponheim, 2008; Zhang et al., 2009). In parallel with this evidence, several reports have documented that, while the severity of manic symptoms in BD is typically higher in carriers of the Met allele (Bilder et al., 2002; Benedetti et al., 2010, 2011; Lelli-Chiesa et al., 2011; Soeiro-de-Souza et al., 2012), this allele is generally predictive of lower intensity of cognitive deficits and negative symptoms in schizophrenia (Malhotra et al., 2002; Bray et al., 2003; Gallinat et al., 2003; Tunbridge et al., 2006; Ehlis et al., 2007). In line with these findings, the Met allele has also been associated with alterations in behavioral functions in healthy subjects, including a decreased vulnerability for cognitive impairments (Strous et al., 1997; Goldberg et al., 2003; Blasi et al., 2005; Smolka et al., 2005), as well as higher predisposition for aggression in vulnerable individuals (Jones et al., 2001; Strous et al., 2003; Albaugh et al., 2010; but see also Chen et al., 2004, for conflicting results).

These results suggest that, irrespective of the specific diagnosis, COMT genotypes may modulate the severity of selected symptoms by influencing COMT activity and catecholaminergic neurotransmission. However, in contrast with evidence in vitro, the three COMT rs4680 genotypes were found to be associated with only modest differences in brain-regional COMT catalytic activity (Tunbridge, 2010), possibly reflecting the influence of environmental and sex-related factors on enzymatic function (Tunbridge, 2010; Godar and Bortolato, 2014). COMT activity may also be affected by its redox status; for example, we showed that COMT activity may be robustly predicted by the activity of methionine sulfoxide reductase, which regulates the degree of oxidation of Met residues in proteins (Moskovitz, 2014).

Based on this background, the present study was designed to study whether, in human post-mortem tissue, brain-regional COMT catalytic activity may be correlated with the severity of different psychopathology symptoms in BD and schizophrenia, as compared with non-affected controls. Furthermore, we verified whether these relationships may be paralleled by associations between COMT genotypes and symptom severity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Human Subjects

The present study was conducted on the same postmortem brain tissues used in a previous study (Moskovitz et al., 2015). All demographic and clinical characteristics of the individuals are described in Table 1. Briefly, the subjects were ten schizophrenia/ schizoaffective disorder patients, thirteen BD patients, and nine control subjects. The three groups did not significantly differ by age [F(2,29)=1.94, NS] (Table 1). Samples were obtained from the Southwest Brain Bank, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, with consent from the next-of-kin.

Table 1.

Characteristics of subjects.

Controls Schizophrenia Bipolar disorder
Number 9 10 13
Mean death age ± SEM 51.56 ± 5.08 54.3 ± 1.81 45.77 ± 2.70
Median death age 54 53 45
Range 20–67 49–64 25–62
% Suicides 0.00% 20.00% 69.23%
% Smokers 30.00% 70.00% 80.00%
Race/ethnicity
Caucasians 77.78% 60.00% 84.61%
Hispanics 22.22% 40.00% 15.39%
Gender
Males 66.67% 70.00% 61.54%
Females 33.33% 30.00% 38.46%
Other characteristics
pH 6.48 ± 0.05 6.23 ± 0.14 6.56 ± 0.04
PMI 26.06 ± 1.11 29.98 ± 2.21 28.22 ± 1.78
BMI 27.93 ± 2.24 29.73 ± 1.23 26.34 ± 1.92

The Southwest Brain Bank collection of postmortem tissues for research is conducted under the jurisdiction of the State of Texas Anatomical Review Board and the UTHSCSA Institutional Review Board regulates the interviews with the next-of-kin (Thompson et al., 2013). Trained clinicians interview the next-of-kin about the donor and conduct a DSM-IV-based Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) (Sheehan et al., 1998). Diagnoses were determined by expert diagnostician group consensus (MINI inter-rater reliability for schizophrenia = 0.8) after review of the interview materials and available medical records.

To assess mood state, psychiatric symptoms, during the last of week of life, and lifetime impulse-control characteristics the following scales were administered to the next-of-kin: Bipolar Inventory of Symptoms Scale (BISS) (Bowden et al., 2007; Thompson et al., 2010); Barratt impulsiveness scale-11 (BIS-11) (Patton et al., 1995), 31-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-31) (Hamilton, 1967; Williams, 2001); Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) (Williams, 2001, Overall, 1962); and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) (Young et al., 1978).

Subjects with a major neurological condition, e.g., Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, brain tumors, etc. were excluded from the study. Postmortem intervals (PMI) ranged between 20 and 45 h, and did not differ significantly across the three subject groups (Table 1). The pH values of brain tissues were also equivalent across groups (Table 1).

Intact fresh brains were transported to the Southwest Brain Bank, and the cerebrum was hemisected. Each hemisphere was cut into 1-cm thick coronal blocks and immediately frozen in 2-methylbutane (Fisher Scientific Co, Fair Lawn, NJ), and stored at −80°C. All tissue samples were analyzed by a neuropathologist, and found to be free of any confounding gross and microscopic neuropathology. The following brain regions were dissected from the right hemisphere: prefrontal cortex (PFC; corresponding to Brodmann area 9); dorsal striatum (rostral caudate); and cerebellum (lateral cerebellar cortex) (Thompson et al., 2013).

The selected brain regions were homogenized in the presence of 25mM Tris-HCl, pH, 7.4 and protease inhibitors cocktail (Roche) at 4°C. Following centrifugation at 10,000 x g for 20 minutes, the supernatants were collected and stored at −80°C for future analyses.

COMT rs4680 genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from brain tissue and COMT rs4680 genotyping was performed as previously indicated (Moskovitz et al, 2015).

Enzymatic activity assay for COMT

Postmortem human brain sections were homogenized as described above and their COMT activity was monitored as previously indicated in Moskovitz et al (2015).

Statistical analyses

Normality and homoscedasticity of data distribution were verified using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Bartlett’s tests. Comparisons between diagnostic groups and genotypes were performed by ANOVAs, followed by Tukey’s test with Spjøtvoll-Stoline corrections for post-hoc comparisons. Multiple correlations between brain-regional COMT activity levels and symptom severity scores were assessed by Pearson’s coefficients. Relations between genotypes and COMT activities were tested by multiple regression, using dummy codes for rs4680 genotypes (0 for Met/Met, 1 for Met/Val and 2 for Val/Val), and compared across diagnostic groups by ANCOVAs. Significance threshold was set at 0.05. Bonferroni corrections for multiple testing were applied throughout the study, as appropriate. However, in consideration of the objections to the conceptual limits of Bonferroni adjustments (Perneger, 1998), uncorrected significant values were also reported. All statistical analyses were performed by STATISTICA 9 (Statsoft, Tulsa, OK).

RESULTS

Differences in brain-regional COMT catalytic activities across diagnostic groups and genotypes

We first assessed the differences in brain-regional COMT activities between controls, schizophrenia and BD subjects, across the three rs4680 genotypes. All values are reported in Table 2. No significant differences in COMT activity among diagnostic groups were found in any of the tested regions [PFC: F(2,28)=0.72, NS; striatum: F(2,29)=1.19, NS; cerebellum: F(2,28)=1.47, NS]. Logistic regression found no significant associations between COMT activity and rs4680 genotype [PFC: F(1,29)=1.30, NS; striatum: F(1,30)=1.43, NS; cerebellum: F(1,29)=0.97, NS]. No differences in brain-regional COMT activities were found among rs4680 genotypes [PFC: F(2,28)=0.63, NS; striatum: F(2,29)=0.89, NS; cerebellum: F(2,28)=2.02, NS].

Table 2.

Brain-regional COMT activities in diagnostic groups and COMT genotypes.

Prefrontal cortex Striatum Cerebellum N

Controls Met/Met 12.19 11.44 33.15 1

Met/Val 19.29 ± 3.02 18.6 ± 2.72 34.39 ± 1.77 4

Val/Val 20.55 ± 6.3 17.8 ± 1.17 39.96 ± 21.19 4

Schizophrenia Met/Met 14.73 ± 3.19 13.12 ± 3.28 29.06 ± 1.98 4

Met/Val 19.56 ± 1.63 18.78 ± 2.01 32.07 ± 2.31 4

Val/Val 21.26 ± 2.16 18.11 ± 2.23 39.98 ± 5.85 2

Bipolar disorder Met/Met 26.93 ± 4.89 19.79 ± 5.58 65.02 ± 1.14 2

Met/Val 22.47 ± 3.18 31.54 ± 10.72 40.55 ± 6.01 9

Val/Val 20.55 ± 6.3 17.8 ± 1.17 39.96 ± 21.19 2

All values are expressed in pmol HMBA/mg protein/min. Data are represented as means ± SEM.; PFC, prefrontal cortex; STR, striatum, CER, cerebellum.

Correlations of behavioral scores and brain-regional COMT activity

The behavioral scores for all subjects are reported in Table 3. The relationships between brain-regional COMT activities and behavioral scores were first analyzed irrespective of diagnostic groups and genotypes (Table 4). Significant correlations were identified between COMT activity in the striatum and both BISS Mania (R= 0.95) and YMRS (R=0.70) scores (P<0.005). Uncorrected significant correlations (P<0.05) were found also for the same scores and COMT activity in the prefrontal cortex; furthermore, correlations were found between BISS Total and BISS Anxiety scores with COMT in both PFC and striatum (Table 4). ANCOVA revealed that the relation between brain-regional COMT activity and symptom severity was not affected by diagnosis. Finally, no correlation was found between brain-regional COMT activities and age (Table 4).

Table 3.

Psychometric characteristics of subjects.

Controls Schizophrenia Bipolar Disorder P η2
Number 9 10 13
BISS Mania 1.17 ± 0.98 4.5 ± 2.01 5.64 ± 3.12 0.53 0.05
BISS Depression 2 ± 1.26 22.13 ± 4.63* 15.27 ± 3.84 0.01 0.33
BISS Irritability 0 4.63 ± 1.46 2.73 ± 1.18 0.07 0.21
BISS Anxiety 0.5 ± 0.34 5.5 ± 1.28 5 ± 1.86 0.12 0.18
BISS Psychosis 0 5.75 ± 1.76 ** 1.09 ± 0.45 0.002 0.42
BISS Total 3.67 ± 1.67 42.5 ± 8.78 * 29.73 ± 8.29 0.01 0.32
BIS-11 71.86 ± 9.09 51.5 ± 5.5 68.56 ± 3.79 0.12 0.37
HRSD-31 0.33 ± 0.33 36 ± 18.23 ** 17.55 ± 5.59 0.01 0.80
BPRS 20.10 ± 2.63 48.13 ± 6.42 *** 30.45 ± 3.64 0.0003 0.49
YMRS 1.39 ± 0.64 10.38 ± 3.02 ** 5.82 ± 1.45 0.006 0.86

Uncorrected significant correlations (P<0.05) are reported in italics and highlighted in grey. Uncorrected significant differences (P<0.05) are reported in italics and highlighted in grey. Corrected significant correlations (P<0.005; Bonferroni correction for multiple testing) are marked in bold. The values indicated in the table are the mean activities ± SEM, as well as the P values of the comparisons (ANOVA).

*

p<0.05;

**

p<0.01,

***

p<0.001 in comparison with non-affected controls (Tukey’s test with Spjøtvoll-Stoline correction for unequal n).

Table 4.

Correlations of behavioral scores with brain-regional COMT activities.

Age COMT
PFC Striatum Cerebellum

BISS Mania −0.61 0.63 0.95 0.55
BISS Depression −0.15 0.33 0.32 0.22
BISS Irritability −0.09 0.34 0.40 0.32
BISS Anxiety −0.33 0.48 0.60 0.45
BISS Psychosis 0.11 0.21 0.06 −0.01
BISS Total −0.34 0.52 0.64 0.42
BIS-11 −0.40 −0.03 0.13 0.30
HRSD-31 −0.11 0.40 0.47 0.38
BPRS −0.07 0.09 0.26 0.15
YMRS −0.48 0.51 0.70 0.47

Uncorrected significant correlations (P<0.05) are reported in italics and highlighted in grey. Corrected significant correlations (P<0.0005; Bonferroni correction for multiple testing) are marked in bold. The values indicated in the table are Pearson’s r coefficients for each correlation. PFC, prefrontal cortex

Relation between COMT genotypes and symptom scores

As shown in Table 5, multiple regression analyses revealed corrected significant associations (P<0.005) between rs4680 genotype and BISS-Depression, BISS-Anxiety, BISS-Total, and BPRS scores. In addition, uncorrected significant associations (P<0.05) were found with BISS-Irritability, HDRS-31 and YMRS scores. The comparison of severity across different genotypes revealed that Met homozygous carriers exhibited higher BISS Total and BISS Anxiety scores in comparison with Val homozygous carriers (P<0.005, ANOVAs); uncorrected significant differences were also found between Met/Met and Val/Val genotypes with respect to HDRS-31, BPRS, YMRS scores and BISS Depression, Irritability and Psychosis sub-scores (P<0.05, ANOVAs). ANCOVA revealed that the relation between rs4680 genotypes and symptom severity was not affected by diagnosis. No significant differences between genotypes were found with respect to BISS Mania and BIS-11 scores (Table 6).

Table 5.

Associations between COMT genotype and symptom severity scores, as revealed by logistic regression.

Adjusted R2 P
BISS Mania −0.02 0.50
BISS Depression 0.28 0.004
BISS Irritability 0.21 0.01
BISS Anxiety 0.36 0.001
BISS Psychosis 0.18 0.02
BISS Total 0.31 0.002
BIS-11 Total 0.06 0.17
HRSD-31 0.23 0.006
BPRS 0.27 0.003
YMRS 0.23 0.007

Uncorrected significant differences (P<0.05) are reported in italics and highlighted in grey.

Table 6.

Differences in behavioral scores across COMT genotypes.

COMT genotype
P η2
Met/Met (n=7) Met/Val (n=17) Val/Val (n=8)
BISS Mania 5.6 ± 3.09 4.54 ± 2.67 2.57 ± 1.29 0.79 0.02
BISS Depression 29.6 ± 4.76 12.15 ± 2.84 7.29 ± 4.85* 0.006 0.37
BISS Irritability 6.2 ± 2.46 2.38 ± 0.9 0.71 ± 0.47* 0.04 0.26
BISS Anxiety 9.6 ± 2.62 3.77 ± 1.12 0.71 ± 0.57** 0.003 0.40
BISS Psychosis 6.4 ± 2.58 1.46 ± 0.73 1 ± 0.65* 0.02 0.31
BISS Total 57.4 ± 11.64 24.31 ± 6.58 11.25 ± 5.33** 0.004 0.38
BIS-11 Total 63 ± 1 65.23 ± 3.44 83 ± 20.6 0.28 0.16
HRSD-31 33.67 ± 9.43 11.85 ± 4.14 6.5 ± 3.69* 0.01 0.31
BPRS 49 ± 10.05 30.08 ± 3 22.88 ± 2.84* 0.008 0.33
YMRS 12 ± 4.11 4.54 ± 1.2 2.38 ± 1.16* 0.01 0.30

Uncorrected significant differences (P<0.05) are reported in italics and highlighted in grey. Corrected significant correlations (P<0.005; Bonferroni correction for multiple testing) are marked in bold. The values indicated in the table are the mean activities ± SEM, as well as the P values of the comparisons (ANOVA).

*

p<0.05;

**

p<0.01 in comparison with Met/Met genotype (Tukey’s test with Spjøtvoll-Stoline correction for unequal n).

DISCUSSION

The results of this study showed a robust correlation between COMT activity in the striatum and manic symptom severity, as defined by both BISS Mania and YMRS scores. Neither association, however, was specific for any diagnostic category. These findings are quite surprising, given that manic symptoms have been typically associated with hyperactivity of DA and NE neurotransmission in the striatum (Manji et al., 2003); a possible interpretation, however, may be that the observed increase in COMT activity in this region is likely secondary to high levels of catecholamine efflux. This compensatory mechanism may be enacted physiologically in the striatum, as a way to curb the negative consequences of oxidative stress induced by DA auto-oxidation (Liu and Mori, 1993). In agreement with this interpretation, preliminary evidence has shown that COMT activity is up-regulated in response to treatment with levodopa, the precursor of DA and NE (Zhao et al., 2001) that augments DAergic neurotransmission and increases the propensity for manic symptoms in BD and non-affected patients (Beaulieu-Boire and Lang, 2015). Notably, preclinical studies suggest that COMT does not serve a physiological role in the metabolism of striatal DA (Gogos et al., 1998), but may play a key role in the degradation of this monoamine in case of excess synthesis/release or deficient reuptake/deamination metabolism (Kaakola and Wurtman, 1992; Huotari et al., 2002). In line with this concept, Chang et al. (2010) documented a reduction of DA transporter in the caudate of BD patients (but see Anand et al., 2011 for contrasting results). Given that our analyses could not include the measurement of brain-regional DA and NE levels, future studies will be needed to validate this intriguing hypothesis.

Our analyses could not confirm the impact of the rs4680 genotype on COMT activity, likely due to our relatively low number of subjects. Nevertheless, our analyses showed that, irrespective of the diagnostic group, Met/Met carriers displayed increases in BISS Anxiety and BISS Total scores, as compared with their Val/Val counterparts. In addition, uncorrected significant associations were found for other severity scores, such as the BPRS, HDRS and YMRS scores. These results are in substantial agreement with previous findings on the association of the Met allele with greater risk for psychopathology as measured by the BPRS scores (Herken and Erdal, 2001; van Winkel et al., 2008). In addition, a number of reports have shown that the Met allele may predispose to affective disturbances in specific groups of vulnerable individuals (Hoth et al., 2006; Åberg et al., 2011). These preliminary findings collectively suggest that the COMT Met variant may be a risk factor for greater severity of several behavioral traits related to anxiety and other dimensions of emotional dysregulation. Although both Val and Met alleles appear to have influences on psychopathology, the moderating effects of these variants may signify distinct contributions to the ontogeny of mental disorders, possibly in relation with other genetic or environmental interactive factors (Vrijsen et al., 2014).

The lack of differences in BIS-11 lifetime impulsivity total scores across different rs4680 genotypes is in agreement with previous findings (Forbes et al., 2009; Paloyelis et al., 2010). Although this result suggests that COMT may not play a direct role in the organization of impulsive behavior, it is worth noting that the Met/Met genotype has been recently associated with worse performance in the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) (Malloy-Diniz et al., 2013), one of the best-validated tasks to assess decision-making alterations in impulsive individuals (Bechara et al., 1994). This apparent discrepancy may reflect the poor association between BIS-11 scores and IGT performance (Kjome et al., 2010), which is posited to signify the high complexity and multifactorial nature of the clinical construct of impulsivity.

In substantial agreement with prior evidence (Daniels et al., 1996; Gutiérrez et al., 1997; Kunugi et al., 1997; Lachman et al., 1997; Karayiorgou et al., 1998; Strous et al., 2006), neither schizophrenia nor BD were associated with differences in either COMT alleles or brain-regional COMT catalytic activity. This result, together with the finding that the association between COMT and symptom severity was not specific to any disease, suggests that a phenotype-based approach may be better suited than current diagnostic criteria to study the biological bases of neuropsychiatric disturbances. This idea is in keeping with the framework established by the Research Domain Criteria of the National Institute of Mental Health, which has underscored the importance of a novel dimensional perspective in the search for diagnostic biomarkers that may assist in the management of mental disorders (Morris and Cuthbert, 2012).

Several limitations should be acknowledged in this study. First, due to the small sample size, the present study is underpowered to identify potential diagnostic differences, as well as significant relationships between diagnoses, COMT activity and rs4680 genotype; furthermore, the same limitation does not allow for the analysis of complex interactions between genotype and gender across different diagnostic groups, or for the evaluation of potential effects of individual medications on COMT activity, which may have interfered with some of the observed correlations. This type of analysis can best be completed using animal models. Second, type I errors may have resulted from potential treatments and/or substance abuse, which may not have known by their next-of-kin. Third, our analyses of COMT activity were based on its shorter, soluble form (S-COMT) expressed in the cytosol, rather than the membrane-bound allozyme (MB-COMT), which features a N-terminal sequence of 50 extra hydrophobic amino acids (Bertocci et al., 1991; Tenhunen et al., 1994; Ulmanen et al., 1997) and is more abundant in the brain (Tenhunen et al., 1994; Tunbridge, 2010). Nevertheless, it is likely that the results obtained on S-COMT can be generalized to MB-COMT, given their similar catalytic activity (Lachman et al., 1996).

These limitations notwithstanding, the present study provides potentially critical contributions to our understanding of the role of COMT in behavioral regulation, and opens to the possibility that striatal elevations in its activity may prove valuable as a potential biological index for the severity of manic symptoms. Future post-mortem investigations and neuroimaging studies with radiolabeled COMT inhibitors are warranted to confirm these results and determine the potential value of COMT striatal activity as a diagnostic index to help monitor the severity of manic symptoms.

Acknowledgments

Funding Sources

This research was supported by NIH grants R01MH104603 (to MB), K01MH077777 (to CWB), R24MH076039 (to PMT), as well as the Hedwig Miller Fund for Aging Research and by an Institutional Development Award (IDeA) from the NIGMS grant P30 GM1110761 (to JM). None of the institutions had any further role in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication. The authors wish to thank Dr. Dianne Cruz for her technical support, as well as the Southwest Brain Bank at UTHSCSA for providing tissue for this project and to the donor families that make this research possible.

Abbreviations

COMT

Catechol-O-methyltransferase

BD

bipolar disorder

DA

dopamine

NE

norepinephrine

PFC

prefrontal cortex

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: None to declare.

References

  1. Åberg E, Fandiño-Losada A, Sjöholm LK, Forsell Y, Lavebratt C. The functional Val158Met polymorphism in catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) is associated with depression and motivation in men from a Swedish population-based study. J Affect Disord. 2011;129:158–166. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Albaugh MD, Harder VS, Althoff RR, Rettew DC, Ehli EA, Lengyel-Nelson T, et al. COMT Val158Met genotype as a risk factor for problem behaviors in youth. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010;49:841–849. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.05.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anand A, Barkay G, Dzemidzic M, Albrecht D, Karne H, Zheng QH, et al. Striatal dopamine transporter availability in unmedicated bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2011;13:406–413. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2011.00936.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Axelrod J, Tomchik R. Enzymatic O-methylation of epinephrine and other catechols. J Biol Chem. 1958;233:702–705. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Beaulieu-Boire I, Lang AE. Behavioral effects of levodopa. Mov Disord. 2015;30:90–102. doi: 10.1002/mds.26121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bechara A, Damasio AR, Damasio H, Anderson SW. Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition. 1994;50:7–15. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Benedetti F, Dallaspezia S, Colombo C, Lorenzi C, Pirovano A, Smeraldi E. Association between catechol-O-methyltransferase Val(108/158)Met polymorphism and psychotic features of bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. 2010;125:341–344. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Benedetti F, Dallaspezia S, Locatelli C, Radaelli D, Poletti S, Lorenzi C, et al. Recurrence of bipolar mania is associated with catechol-O-methyltransferase Val(108/158)Met polymorphism. J Affect Disord. 2011;132:293–296. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.02.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bertocci B, Miggiano V, Da Prada M, Dembic Z, Lahm HW, Malherbe P. Human catechol-O-methyltransferase: cloning and expression of the membrane-associated form. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88:1416–1420. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.4.1416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bilder RM, Volavka J, Czobor P, Malhotra AK, Kennedy JL, Ni X, et al. Neurocognitive correlates of the COMT Val(158)Met polymorphism in chronic schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2002;52:701–707. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01416-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Blasi G, Mattay VS, Bertolino A, Elvevåg B, Callicott JH, Das S, et al. Effect of catechol-O-methyltransferase val158Met genotype on attentional control. J Neurosci. 2005;25:5038–5045. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0476-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bowden CL, Singh V, Thompson P, Gonzalez JM, Katz MM, Dahl M, et al. Development of the bipolar inventory of symptoms scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2007;116:189–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00955.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bray NJ, Buckland PR, Williams NM, Williams HJ, Norton N, Owen MJ, et al. A haplotype implicated in schizophrenia susceptibility is associated with reduced COMT expression in human brain. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;73:152–161. doi: 10.1086/376578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chang TT, Yeh TL, Chiu NT, Chen PS, Huang HY, Yang YK, et al. Higher striatal dopamine transporters in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder: a SPECT study with [Tc] TRODAT-1. Bipolar Disord. 2010;12:102–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2009.00771.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen J, Lipska BK, Halim N, Ma QD, Matsumoto M, Melhem S, et al. Functional analysis of genetic variation in catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT): effects on mRNA, protein, and enzyme activity in postmortem human brain. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;75:807–821. doi: 10.1086/425589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cousins DA, Butts K, Young AH. The role of dopamine in bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2009;11:787–806. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2009.00760.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Daniels JK, Williams NM, Williams J, Jones LA, Cardno AG, Murphy KC, et al. No evidence for allelic association between schizophrenia and a polymorphism determining high or low catechol O-methyltransferase activity. Am J Psychiatry. 1996;153:268–270. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.2.268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Egan MF, Goldberg TE, Kolachana BS, Callicott JH, Mazzanti CM, Straub RE, et al. Effect of COMT Val108/158 Met genotype on frontal lobe function and risk for schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:6917–6922. doi: 10.1073/pnas.111134598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ehlis AC, Reif A, Herrmann MJ, Lesch KP, Fallgatter AJ. Impact of catechol-O-methyltransferase on prefrontal brain functioning in schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2007;32:162–170. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Forbes EE, Brown SM, Kimak M, Ferrell RE, Manuck SB, Hariri AR. Genetic variation in components of dopamine neurotransmission impacts ventral striatal reactivity associated with impulsivity. Mol Psychiatry. 2009;14:60–70. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4002086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gallinat J, Bajbouj M, Sander T, Schlattmann P, Xu K, Ferro EF, et al. Association of the G1947A COMT (Val(108/158)Met) gene polymorphism with prefrontal P300 during information processing. Biol Psychiatry. 2003;54:40–48. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01973-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Godar SC, Bortolato M. Gene-sex interactions in schizophrenia: focus on dopamine neurotransmission. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014;8:71. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Goghari VM, Sponheim SR. Differential association of the COMT Val158Met polymorphism with clinical phenotypes in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Schizophr Res. 2008;103:186–191. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2008.05.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gogos JA, Morgan M, Luine V, Santha M, Ogawa S, Pfaff D, et al. Catechol-O-methyltransferase-deficient mice exhibit sexually dimorphic changes in catecholamine levels and behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:9991–9996. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.17.9991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Goldberg TE, Egan MF, Gscheidle T, Coppola R, Weickert T, Kolachana BS, et al. Executive subprocesses in working memory: relationship to catechol-O-methyltransferase Val158Met genotype and schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;60:889–896. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.9.889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gutiérrez B, Bertranpetit J, Guillamat R, Vallès V, Arranz MJ, Kerwin R, et al. Association analysis of the catechol O-methyltransferase gene and bipolar affective disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154:113–115. doi: 10.1176/ajp.154.1.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hamilton M. Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br J Soc Clin Psychol. 1967;6:278–296. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1967.tb00530.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Herken H, Erdal ME. Catechol-O-methyltransferase gene polymorphism in schizophrenia: evidence for association between symptomatology and prognosis. Psychiatr Genet. 2001;11:105–109. doi: 10.1097/00041444-200106000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hoth KF, Paul RH, Williams LM, Dobson-Stone C, Todd E, Schofield PR, et al. Associations between the COMT Val/Met polymorphism, early life stress, and personality among healthy adults. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2006;2:219–225. doi: 10.2147/nedt.2006.2.2.219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Howes OD, Kapur S. The dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia: version III--the final common pathway. Schizophr Bull. 2009;35:549–562. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbp006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Huotari M, Gogos JA, Karayiorgou M, Koponen O, Forsberg M, Raasmaja A, et al. Brain catecholamine metabolism in catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT)-deficient mice. Eur J Neurosci. 2002;15:246–56. doi: 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01856.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jones G, Zammit S, Norton N, Hamshere ML, Jones SJ, Milham C, et al. Aggressive behaviour in patients with schizophrenia is associated with catechol-O-methyltransferase genotype. Br J Psychiatry. 2001;179:351–355. doi: 10.1192/bjp.179.4.351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kaakkola S, Wurtman RJ. Effects of COMT inhibitors on striatal dopamine metabolism: a microdialysis study. Brain Res. 1992;587:241–249. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(92)91003-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Karayiorgou M, Gogos JA, Galke BL, Wolyniec PS, Nestadt G, Antonarakis SE, et al. Identification of sequence variants and analysis of the role of the catechol-O-methyl-transferase gene in schizophrenia susceptibility. Biol Psychiatry. 1998;43:425–431. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(97)00202-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kirov G, Murphy KC, Arranz MJ, Jones I, McCandles F, Kunugi H, et al. Low activity allele of catechol-O-methyltransferase gene associated with rapid cycling bipolar disorder. Mol Psychiatry. 1998;3:342–345. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4000385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kjome KL, Lane SD, Schmitz JM, Green C, Ma L, Prasla I, et al. Relationship between impulsivity and decision making in cocaine dependence. Psychiatry Res. 2010;178:299–304. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.11.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kunugi H, Vallada HP, Hoda F, Kirov G, Gill M, Aitchison KJ, et al. No evidence for an association of affective disorders with high- or low-activity allele of catechol-o-methyltransferase gene. Biol Psychiatry. 1997;42:282–285. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(96)00366-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lachman HM, Kelsoe J, Moreno L, Katz S, Papolos DF. Lack of association of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) functional polymorphism in bipolar affective disorder. Psychiatr Genet. 1997;7:13–7. doi: 10.1097/00041444-199700710-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lachman HM, Papolos DF, Saito T, Yu YM, Szumlanski CL, Weinshilboum RM. Human catechol-O-methyltransferase pharmacogenetics: description of a functional polymorphism and its potential application to neuropsychiatric disorders. Pharmacogenetics. 1996;6:243–250. doi: 10.1097/00008571-199606000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lelli-Chiesa G, Kempton MJ, Jogia J, Tatarelli R, Girardi P, Powell J, et al. The impact of the Val158Met catechol-O-methyltransferase genotype on neural correlates of sad facial affect processing in patients with bipolar disorder and their relatives. Psychol Med. 2011;41:779–788. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710001431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Liu J, Mori A. Monoamine metabolism provides an antioxidant defense in the brain against oxidant- and free radical-induced damage. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1993;302:18–27. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1993.1189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Malhotra AK, Kestler LJ, Mazzanti C, Bates JA, Goldberg T, Goldman D. A functional polymorphism in the COMT gene and performance on a test of prefrontal cognition. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:652–654. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.4.652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Malloy-Diniz LF, Lage GM, Campos SB, de Paula JJ, de Souza Costa D, Romano-Silva MA, et al. Association between the Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) Val158Met polymorphism and different dimensions of impulsivity. PLoS One. 2013;8:e73509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Manji HK, Quiroz JA, Payne JL, Singh J, Lopes BP, Viegas JS, et al. The underlying neurobiology of bipolar disorder. World Psychiatry. 2003;2:136–146. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Männistö PT, Kaakkola S. Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT): biochemistry, molecular biology, pharmacology, and clinical efficacy of the new selective COMT inhibitors. Pharmacol Rev. 1999;51:593–628. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Morris SE, Cuthbert BN. Research Domain Criteria: cognitive systems, neural circuits, and dimensions of behavior. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2012;14:29–37. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2012.14.1/smorris. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Moskovitz J, Walss-Bass C, Cruz DA, Thompson PM, Bortolato M. Methionine sulfoxide reductase regulates brain catechol-O-methyl transferase activity. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014;17:1707–1713. doi: 10.1017/S1461145714000467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Moskovitz J, Walss-Bass C, Cruz DA, Thompson PM, Hairston J, Bortolato M. The enzymatic activities of brain catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) and methionine sulphoxide reductase are correlated in a COMT Val/Met allele-dependent fashion. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2015;41:941–951. doi: 10.1111/nan.12219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Overall JE, Gorham DR. The brief psychiatric rating scale. Psychological Reports. 1962;10:799–812. [Google Scholar]
  50. Paloyelis Y, Asherson P, Mehta MA, Faraone SV, Kuntsi J. DAT1 and COMT effects on delay discounting and trait impulsivity in male adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and healthy controls. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35:2414–2426. doi: 10.1038/npp.2010.124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Patton JH, Stanford MS, Barratt ES. Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. J Clin Psychol. 1995;51:768–774. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199511)51:6<768::aid-jclp2270510607>3.0.co;2-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Perneger TV. What’s wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. BMJ. 1998;316:1236–1238. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7139.1236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, et al. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59:22–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Smolka MN, Schumann G, Wrase J, Grüsser SM, Flor H, Mann K, et al. Catechol-O-methyltransferase val158Met genotype affects processing of emotional stimuli in the amygdala and prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci. 2005;25:836–842. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1792-04.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Soeiro-de-Souza MG, Machado-Vieira R, Soares Bio D, Do Prado CM, Moreno RA. COMT polymorphisms as predictors of cognitive dysfunction during manic and mixed episodes in bipolar I disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2012;14:554–564. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2012.01030.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Strous RD, Bark N, Parsia SS, Volavka J, Lachman HM. Analysis of a functional catechol-O-methyltransferase gene polymorphism in schizophrenia: evidence for association with aggressive and antisocial behavior. Psychiatry Res. 1997;69:71–77. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1781(96)03111-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Strous RD, Lapidus R, Viglin D, Kotler M, Lachman HM. Analysis of an association between the COMT polymorphism and clinical symptomatology in schizophrenia. Neurosci Lett. 2006;393:170–173. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.09.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Strous RD, Nolan KA, Lapidus R, Diaz L, Saito T, Lachman HM. Aggressive behavior in schizophrenia is associated with the low enzyme activity COMT polymorphism: a replication study. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2003;120B:29–34. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.20021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Tenhunen J, Salminen M, Lundström K, Kiviluoto T, Savolainen R, Ulmanen I. Genomic organization of the human catechol O-methyltransferase gene and its expression from two distinct promoters. Eur J Biochem. 1994;223:1049–1059. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb19083.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Thompson PM, Bernardo CG, Cruz DA, Ketchum NS, Michalek JE. Concordance of psychiatric symptom ratings between a subject and informant, relevancy to post-mortem research. Transl Psychiatry. 2013;3:e214. doi: 10.1038/tp.2012.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Thompson PM, Gonzalez JM, Singh V, Schoolfield JD, Katz MM, Bowden CL. Principal domains of behavioral psychopathology identified by the Bipolar Inventory of Signs and Symptoms Scale (BISS) Psychiatry Res. 2010;175:221–226. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Tunbridge EM, Harrison PJ, Weinberger DR. Catechol-o-methyltransferase, cognition, and psychosis: Val158Met and beyond. Biol Psychiatry. 2006;60:141–151. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.10.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Tunbridge EM. The catechol-O-methyltransferase gene: its regulation and polymorphisms. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2010;95:7–27. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-381326-8.00002-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Ulmanen I, Peränen J, Tenhunen J, Tilgmann C, Karhunen T, Panula P, et al. Expression and intracellular localization of catechol-O-methyltransferase in transfected mammalian cells. Eur J Biochem. 1997;243:452–459. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.0452a.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Van Kammen DP, Kelley M. Dopamine and norepinephrine activity in schizophrenia. An integrative perspective. Schizophr Res. 1991;4:173–191. doi: 10.1016/0920-9964(91)90032-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Van Winkel R, Isusi P, Galdos P, Echevarria E, Bilbao JR, Martin-Pagola A, et al. Evidence that the COMTVal158Met polymorphism moderates subclinical psychotic and affective symptoms in unaffected first-degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia. Eur Psychiatry. 2008;23:219–222. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2007.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Vrijsen JN, van Oostrom I, Arias-Vásquez A, Franke B, Becker ES, Speckens A. Association between genes, stressful childhood events and processing bias in depression vulnerable individuals. Genes Brain Behav. 2014;13:508–516. doi: 10.1111/gbb.12129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Williams JB. Standardizing the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: past, present, and future. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001;251(Suppl 2):II6–12. doi: 10.1007/BF03035120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Yamamoto K, Hornykiewicz O. Proposal for a noradrenaline hypothesis of schizophrenia. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2004;28:913–922. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2004.05.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Young RC, Biggs JT, Ziegler VE, Meyer DA. A rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity. Br J Psychiatry. 1978;133:429–35. doi: 10.1192/bjp.133.5.429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Zhang Z, Lindpaintner K, Che R, He Z, Wang P, Yang P, et al. The Val/Met functional polymorphism in COMT confers susceptibility to bipolar disorder: evidence from an association study and a meta-analysis. J Neural Transm. 2009;116:1193–1200. doi: 10.1007/s00702-009-0260-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Zhao WQ, Latinwo L, Liu XX, Lee ES, Lamango N, Charlton CG. L-dopa upregulates the expression and activities of methionine adenosyl transferase and catechol-O-methyltransferase. Exp Neurol. 2001;171:127–138. doi: 10.1006/exnr.2001.7726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES