Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2017 Mar 24;28(4):575–586. doi: 10.1016/j.jana.2017.03.004

Quality of Life among Women Living with HIV in Rural India

Adeline M Nyamathi 1,*, Maria Ekstrand 2, Kartik Yadav 3, Padma Ramakrishna 4, Elsa Heylen 5, Catherine Carpenter 6, Sarah Wall 7, Tanya Oleskowicz 8, Lenore Arab 9, Sanjeev Sinha 10
PMCID: PMC5468467  NIHMSID: NIHMS862806  PMID: 28473182

Abstract

A cross-sectional examination was conducted on Quality of Life (QOL) among Women Living with HIV (WLWH) in rural Andhra Pradesh, India. Baseline data were collected from 400 WLWH and their children. QOL was measured with 10 items from the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire. Findings revealed low QOL scores; on a scale from 0 to 3, the mean QOL score was 0.38 (SD = 0.30). Depression symptoms were reported by 25.5%, internalized stigma was high, and most reported little to no social support. Multivariable analysis revealed positive associations between QOL and CD4+ T cells (b = .0011, p = .021) and social support (b = .260, p < .0001) and a negative relationship between QOL and internalized stigma (b = −.232, p < .0001). Interventions focused on improving QOL for WLWH should incorporate strategies to improve social support and adherence to antiretroviral therapy, while mitigating internalized stigma.

Keywords: HIV, India, quality of life, women


Quality of life (QOL) is a multidimensional concept that represents the individual’s perception of his or her physical, psychological, social, and cognitive health (Jackson, Krishnan, Meccone, Ockene, & Rubenfire, 2010). QOL refers to how satisfied and content the individual is about his or her life as a whole (Wilson & Cleary, 1995), and has become a critical variable that permeates all facets of life for women living with HIV (WLWH). QOL is important for women in general, and rural women in particular, because antiretroviral therapy (ART) has now made HIV infection a manageable chronic disease. As medical advances have prolonged life expectancy and physical health has improved, the next logical step of treatment is development and assessment of interventions related to improving QOL for WLWH. In this paper, we focus on QOL in WLWH in rural India.

Of the 2.09 million persons living with HIV (PLWH) in India (National AIDS Control Organization, 2015), half reside in rural areas that are often agrarian regions possessing poor infrastructure that limits access to health care (Pallikadavath, Garda, Apte, Freedman, & Stones, 2005). Rural WLWH, in particular, are often illiterate and lack employment; they report limited autonomy and less decision-making power (Amin, 2004). Moreover, in a recent study, while the majority of rural women had knowledge of HIV (61%; Subramanian, Gupte, & Ezhil, 2007), significantly fewer knew about ways to prevent transmission (28%), and fewer had even rudimentary knowledge of HIV transmission (23.4%; Ackerson, Ramanadhan, Arya, & Viswanath, 2012).

The state of Andhra Pradesh, the site of our study, has reported a prevalence of HIV (0.66%) higher than the other “high HIV prevalence states” of India such as Karnataka (0.45%), Gujarat (0.42%), and Goa (0.40%; National AIDS Control Organization, 2015). Andhra Pradesh is the eighth largest state in India, is situated on the southeastern coast, and hosts a total population of 49.38 million inhabitants (Directorate of Economics and Statistics, 2015). Because treatment centers for HIV are generally found in urban areas of India (Van Rompay et al., 2008), rural women are more likely to experience difficulties accessing care as compared to their urban counterparts (Gupta et al., 2008; Nyamathi, Sinha et al., 2011). In fact, recent data suggest that just 36% of adults eligible for ART in India (CD4+ T cell < 350 cells/mm3) receive ongoing treatment (Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS [UNAIDS], 2014). This percent may worsen as India implements its planned expansion to persons with CD4+ T cell counts lower than 500 cells/mm3.

Quality of Life (QOL) Research

Research in India among PLWH has revealed that poorer QOL was associated with being younger, female, living in a rural environment, newly diagnosed with HIV, not taking ART, and experiencing more stigma-related events (Mahalakshmy, Premarajan, & Hamide, 2011). Among PLWH in Andhra Pradesh, Vigneshwaran, Padmanabhareddy, Devanna, and Alvarez-Uria (2013) found the lowest QOL to be in social and daily activity domains. The lowest scores were reported in women compared to men (Chandra, Satyanarayana, Satishchandra, Satish, & Kumar, 2009; Vigneshwaran et al., 2013); illiterate or separated women reported lower QOL scores than those who were literate or married (Vigneshwaran et al., 2013). In a study of 400 participants (212 female) in Tamil Nadu, 34% of respondents reported poor QOL (Charles et al., 2012). Predictors of poor QOL included being impoverished, earning less than Rs 2000/month (equivalent to USD $38.46), being severely depressed, and having low social support.

Food insecurity, defined as having limited or uncertain availability of nutritionally adequate and safe foods (Weiser et al., 2011), is another correlate of QOL. Moderate to severe levels of food insecurity were associated with lower QOL, in both men and women (Heylen, Panicker, Chandy, Steward, & Ekstrand, 2015). Further, as stigma, perception of stigma, and psychosocial consequences of stigma are known to compromise QOL and jeopardize treatment access and adherence (Kleinman et al., 2015; Zelaya et al., 2012), culturally-appropriate interventions are necessary to educate, provide support, and empower rural WLWH to confront stigma, limit vulnerability, and eradicate disparities (Rogers et al., 2006).

Currently however, many challenges still exist for rural WLWH. This is particularly the case when WLWH hear about and experience stigma, discrimination, and other human rights abuses directed toward women like themselves (UNAIDS, 2014). A qualitative study of rural WLWH in Andhra Pradesh found that the barriers to accessing care included illness-related factors, limited physical and financial support, and psychological factors (Nyamathi et al., 2016). For many rural women, surmounting the challenges of accessing care, maintaining adherence to medication regimens, and maintaining their own positive mental health status while acting as caregivers to others may prove daunting (Sinha, Peters, & Bollinger, 2009).

Theoretical Framework

The guiding framework for our study of rural women’s perceptions of physical, psychological, social, and cognitive health is the Comprehensive Health Seeking and Coping Paradigm (CHSCP; Nyamathi, 1989). The CHSCP is most appropriate as it articulates factors that impact the health of the individual and barriers and facilitators to achieving optimum health. Factors include the thoughts and behaviors individuals rely on to overcome threats to health, to deal with life crises, and to retain or attain optimal health. Such variables include physical and psychological health, including QOL, stigma, depressive symptoms, food insecurity, and social and behavioral factors. These variables led to the selection of the measures utilized in this study.

Currently, there is little understanding of QOL, stigma, depression, and food insecurity among rural WLWH, particularly in areas where basic knowledge of HIV transmission is lacking (Ghosh et al., 2011). The aims of our study were (a) to provide an understanding of factors associated with QOL among rural WLWH in India, and (b) to gain a better appreciation of the challenges rural WLWH are experiencing. Theoretically based correlates include depression, stigma, social support, and food insecurity.

Method

Design

We used baseline data collected from 400 WLWH in Southern India. The women were all enrolled in an ongoing longitudinal trial designed to assess the impact of a culturally-tailored intervention on ART adherence, as well as on physical, psychological, and social outcomes for themselves and one child. Human Subjects Protection Committee clearances were obtained in the United States from the University of California Los Angeles Office of the Human Research Protection Program and in India from the Institution Ethics Committee for the All India Institute of Medical Sciences. Baseline data for the 400 WLWH were collected from May 2014 to November 2015.

Sample and Setting

Women who met the following inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study: (a) 18 to 50 years of age, (b) diagnosed with HIV and receiving ART for 3 months or longer, (c) CD4+ T cell count greater than 100 cells/mm3, and (d) having at least one child (ages 3–8 years) living with them. The setting consisted of four demographically similar yet geographically distinct districts, which were then randomized into three of the four programs.

Screening Procedures

Approved flyers that provided details about the study were posted in selected Primary Health Clinics (PHC) frequented by WLWH. A recruiter met with women who were interested in further details in a private place at the PHC. The PHCs were selected because they were easily accessible community clinics for symptomatic care of PLWH. After further details about the study were provided, informed consent for the screening survey was discussed and signed. Thereafter, the research staff administered a 2-minute screener to determine eligibility for the potential participant. Once deemed eligible, the women were provided further details about the study and, if interest continued, a second consent form was described and signed, and the baseline questionnaire administered.

For women who were not able to demonstrate their HIV status by a hospital-generated ART card, HIV testing was conducted, with pretest and posttest counseling provided by the trained research staff. CD4+ T cell count testing was also conducted as part of the screening protocol.

We offered an incentive, which ranged from USD $172 to USD $182 for the entire program, depending on assigned group. Coercion was carefully considered by the human subject protection committee and avoided by providing a nominal amount of compensation for the women to assist with childcare, loss of pay for the time of enrollment, or transportation needs.

Measures

All of our instruments had been used with either rural (Nyamathi, Hanson, et al., 2012; Nyamathi, Salem, et al., 2012) or urban (Ekstrand, Solomon, Gopalkrishnan, Krishnan, & Kumarasamy, 2010; Ekstrand, Chandy, Heylen, Steward, & Singh, 2010; Ekstrand et al., 2011; Steward et al., 2011) PLWH in southern India. The selection of these measures was guided by the theoretical framework. The questionnaire was translated from English to Telugu and back translated from Telugu to English by a second research staff member (Marin & Marin, 1991).

Sociodemographic Factors

Sociodemographic information obtained included age, education, marital status, religion, and number of children.

Quality of Life (QOL)

QOL was measured with 10 items from the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Endicott, Nee, Harrison, & Blumenthal, 1993), an internationally used and validated measure (Heylen et al., 2015; Lee et al., 2014; Ritsner, Kurs, Kostizky, Ponizovsky, & Modai, 2002; Rossi et al., 2005). On a scale from 0 = very unsatisfied to 3 = very satisfied, participants indicated satisfaction with their health, finances, and other variables during the previous week. An overall score was created as the mean of all items (alpha = 0.79).

Physical Health Factors

Months living with HIV

Each WLWH was asked the month and year that she was diagnosed with HIV to calculate the number of months she had been living with HIV.

ART regimen

Respondents self-reported the HIV medications they were taking. The ART regimen was verified via each woman’s prescription slip or medication blister pack. All participants received medications at government-run ART clinics per the guidelines of the National AIDS Control Organization.

CD4+ T cell count

Blood samples collected at screening were sent to the district hospital lab for CD4+ T cell count determination by flow cytometry. The absolute numbers of CD4+ T cells were obtained by multiplying percent CD4+ T cell count from flow cytometry by total white blood cell count (determined by Act Diff Coulter). Women with CD4+ T cell counts lower than 100 cells/mm3 were excluded from the study as these women were generally unable to participate due to extreme physical weakness and greater risk of not being able to complete all follow up sessions. CD4+ T cells were analyzed as a continuous variable.

Opportunistic infections (OI)

Participants were presented with a list of 8 OIs (e.g., tuberculosis, fungal dermatoses) and indicated for each whether they had experienced it in the previous 6 months. We summed the number of OIs selected. The scale was based on the most common OIs endorsed by our collaborating physicians.

Perceived ART symptoms and side effects

A similar procedure to the OI assessment was used with a list of 18 potential ART symptoms and side effects such as vomiting, loss of energy, and changes in body shape due to weight gain/loss.

Food insecurity

The Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS; Coates, Swindale, & Bilinsky, 2007) was used to measure food insecurity. This widely used scale in India and elsewhere (Pasricha et al., 2010; Tsai et al., 2011; Vargas Puello, Alvarado Orellana, & Atalah Samur, 2013; Weiser et al., 2011) includes 9 items that assess the frequency, in the previous 4 weeks, of worrying about not having enough food (1 item), and perceived insufficient quality (3 items) and quantity of food (5 items), due to a lack of resources. Response options range from 0 = Never to 3 = Often, and were summed across all items.

Psychological Health

Depression

The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), short version (Radloff, 1977), 10-item scale was used to measure the frequency and severity of depressive symptoms on a 0 to 3 scale. The CES-D has well-established reliability and validity (Radloff, 1977) including in India (Nyamathi, Heravian et al., 2011). Scores were summed, resulting in a range from 0 to 30, with higher scores for greater depressive symptoms. The scale was dichotomized at the suggested cut point of 10 or higher (Zhang et al., 2012) to indicate a need for psychiatric evaluation.

Internalized stigma

A 10-item scale measured the extent to which respondents believed that they deserved to be shunned (5 items, e.g., should avoid visiting people, holding an infant) or blamed/shamed because of their HIV infection (5 items, e.g., shamed the family, feel guilty; Steward et al., 2008). Each item had a 4-point response scale (0 = not at all to 3 = a great deal) and responses were averaged to create a scale score. In prior studies with PLWH in India, the reliability for the entire scale was Cronbach’s alpha = 0.83 (Ekstrand, Bharat, Ramakrishna, & Heylen, 2012; Steward et al., 2011). In our sample, alpha was 0.66.

Social Factors

Social support

The MOS Social Support Survey (Sherbourne & Stewart, 1991) was used to assess four domains of functional social support: emotional/information support (8 items, e.g. ,someone to share your most private worries and fears with), tangible support (3 items, e.g., someone to take you to the doctor if you needed it), positive social interactions (3 items, e.g., someone to have a good time with), and affectionate support (3 items, e.g., someone who shows you love and affection). Each item was answered on a scale ranging from 1 = available none of the time to 5 = available all of the time. Per established scoring guidelines, a mean score for each domain was calculated, as well as an overall social support index consisting of all of the above plus one. Reliability ranged from alpha = 0.94 for the overall scale to 0.73 for the positive interactions domain.

One additional item assessed how many friends and relatives the respondent had with whom she felt at ease and could talk about what was on her mind (Sherbourne & Stewart, 1991). Given the large amount of 0 responses, we dichotomized this item as any (1) vs. none (0).

Behavioral Factors

Adherence to ART

A self-reported measure assessed adherence to ART via a Visual Analogue Scale (Giordano, Guzman, Clark, Charlebois, & Bangsberg, 2004), in which participants were shown a line with numbered intervals between 0 and 100 and were asked to point to the spot on the line that best represented the percent of pills they took in the past month. This measure has been validated with Indian patients (Ekstrand, Chandy, et al., 2010).

Data Analysis

Categorical variables were described with frequencies and percentages. Summary statistics for continuous variables included mean, standard deviation, median, and range. Bivariate associations of QOL with categorical variables were assessed via the Spearman’s r test, and with continuous variables via Pearson correlation coefficient. Those variables bivariately associated with adherence (p < 0.20) were subsequently evaluated in a multiple linear regression model. Only variables associated with QOL at p < 0.05 were retained in the final model. The final model was examined for multicollinearity, heteroscedasticity, and influential outliers. One outlier was detected, but the observation was retained as removing it from the model did not change the findings. Analyses were performed in SPSS version 23 and R 3.3.0.

Results

As reflected in Table 1, the mean age of the 400 WLWH was 33.8 (SD = 6.6); more than half of the women (51%, n = 204) reported no formal education. The women were primarily Hindu (73%, n = 290), and more than half (53%, n = 211) were widowed. The majority of women (51%, n = 203) were on the tenofovir, lamiduvine, and efavirenz (TDF, 3TC, EFV) ART medication regimen; mean time since HIV diagnosis was 51 months (SD = 35). Mean percent of pills taken in the previous month was 30% (SD = 14).

Table 1.

Demographic and ART Related Characteristics of the Sample (n = 400)

Measure n %
Number of children
 1 134 33.5
 2 198 49.5
 3–6 68 17.0
Marital Status
 Married 157 39.3
 Widowed 211 52.8
 Divorced/Separated 32 8.0
Education
 None 204 51.0
 < 5 years 66 16.5
 5–9 years 78 19.5
 ≥ 10 years 52 13.0
Religion
 Hindu 290 72.5
 Christian 76 19.0
 Muslim 34 8.5
ART Regimen
 AZT + 3TC + NVP 124 31.0
 AZT + 3TC + EFV 11 2.8
 TDF + 3TC + NVP 59 14.8
 TDF + 3TC + EFV 203 50.7
 TDF + 3TC + Ritonavir + Atazanavir or Lopinavir 3 0.8
Measure M SD
Age 33.77 6.57
Percent adherence past month 30.2 14.4
Time since HIV diagnosis, months 50.9 35.3

Note. 3TC = lamivudine; AZT = zidovudine; EFV = efavirenz; NVP = nevirapine; TDF = tenofovir disoproxil fumerate; ART = antiretroviral therapy.

Physical and Mental Health

Physical and mental health characteristics of the women are reflected in Table 2. Nearly all women (96% to 100%) experienced symptoms in the areas of fever, lack of energy/fatigue, tingling/numbness in the hands or feet, diarrhea, nausea/upset stomach, and/or change in body shape. Additional symptoms experienced by at least 85% of the women included headaches, dizziness, and vomiting. CD4+ T cell counts lower than 350 cells/mm3 were found in more than 40% of the women (n = 165). OIs reported were numerous and included febrile illness, diarrhea, and fungal dermatosis (90% to 100%); less common OIs included Pneumocystis carinii, candida, herpes simplex, tuberculosis, and vaginal discharge (64% to 6%). Mean number of OIs experienced in the previous 6 months was 4.69 (SD = 1.29), with a range of 1 to 8. Not surprisingly, fewer than one third (30.2%) of the women reported adherence to ART during the previous month. Depressive symptoms were reported by 25.5% of the women (n = 102).

Table 2.

Physical and Mental Health Characteristics of the Sample (n = 400)

Measure n %
Depression: CES-D short score ≥ 10 102 25.5
Number of close friends/family
 0 227 56.8
 1 143 35.8
 ≥ 2 30 7.5
CD4+ T cell count > 350 cells/mm3 235 58.8
Symptoms past 6 months endorsed by > 50% of participants .
 Fever 399 99.8
 No energy/fatigue 397 99.3
 Tingling numbness in hands/feet 389 97.3
 Diarrhea 387 96.8
 Nausea/upset stomach 385 96.3
 Change body shape due to weight gain or loss 383 95.8
 Dizziness 379 94.8
 Vomiting 377 94.3
 Skin rashes 366 91.5
 Stomach pain, cramps 356 89.0
 Frequent headaches 356 89.0
 Depression, mood swings 335 83.8
 Trouble sleeping 303 75.8
Opportunistic infections past 6 months
 Febrile illness 398 99.5
 Chronic or acute diarrhea 380 95.0
 Fungal dermatoses 361 90.3
 Herpes Simplex/Varicella Zoster 255 63.7
 Candida 252 63.0
Pneumocystis carinii 160 40.0
 Tuberculosis 47 11.8
 Vaginal discharge/Reproductive tract infection 23 5.8
M (SD)

Quality of life (0–3) 0.38 (0.30)
MOS Social Support (1–5)
 Emotional/Information support 1.08 (0.28)
 Tangible support 1.25 (0.44)
 Positive social interaction 1.08 (0.27)
 Affectionate support 1.04 (0.28)
 Overall social support 1.10 (0.27)
Internalized stigma (0–3) 2.29 (0.30)
Food insecurity (0–27) 21.0 (3.96)
Number of side effects past 6 months (0–18) 13.26 (1.75)
Number of OI past 6 months (0–8) 4.69 (1.29)

Note. OI = opportunistic infection(s); CES-D = Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale.

Social and Resource Support

In general, the number of close friends or family reported by the women was low; 57% (n = 227) reported having no friends or family they could confide in. The highest type of support provided (tangible support) was, on average, 1.25 (SD = .44). All other types of support, which included emotional/informational support, positive social interaction, and affectionate support had an average rating of 1.05, which was at the available none of the time bottom point of the scale. Overall support reported was M = 1.10, SD = .27. Stigma findings, on the other hand, were reversed. The average score for internalized stigma, scored on a range of 0 to 3, was 2.29 (SD = .30). Food insecurity was likewise rated high by the women, with an average score of 21 (SD = 3.96) out of 27.

Quality of Life

QOL scores were almost uniformly low, with minimal dispersion. With a scale range from 0 to 3, the mean QOL score reported by these rural women was 0.38 (SD = 0.30). In reviewing the individual items that composed the QOL scale, the percentage of respondents indicating being very satisfied ranged from 0.3% (n = 1; satisfaction with money situation) to 8.3% (n = 33, satisfaction with housing). Besides housing, sexual drive (6.3%, n = 25) was the only other area for which more than 5% of women indicated satisfaction in the previous week.

Bivariate Analysis

A number of variables were positively correlated with QOL scores in the bivariate analyses (Table 3). These included being married (vs. divorce/separated or widowed, p = .031) and higher CD4+ T cell count (r = .123, p = .014). All types of social support (emotional, tangible, positive interaction, affectionate, and total support) were highly related with QOL (r = .174 to .251, p < .001 for all variables). This was likewise true for the variable Any Support (u = .44 vs. u = .34 for No Social Support, p < .001) or Having close relative or friends (u = .44 vs. u = .34 for None, p < .001). Alternatively, several variables were significantly negatively related to QOL. This included Number of OIs in the past 6 months (r = − .101, p = .044) and Internalized stigma (r = −.191, p < .001). A trend for significant negative relationship for food insecurity and QOL was also observed (r = −.088, p = .080).

Table 3.

Correlates of QOL Score – Bivariate Analysis

Characteristic M (SD) Spearman’s r P
Age in years −0.078 0.118
Marital status
 Married 0.42 (0.27) 0.031
 Divorce/separated 0.31 (0.26)
 Widowed 0.37 (0.33)
Number of children
 1 0.35 (0.25) 0.263
 2 0.38 (0.28)
 ≥3 0.46 (0.43)
Education
 None 0.39 (0.32) 0.581
 < 5 years 0.41 (0.33)
 5–9 years 0.38 (0.25)
 ≥ 10 years 0.33 (0.26)
Religion
 Hindu 0.39 (0.32) 0.094
 Muslim 0.28 (0.22)
 Christian 0.4 (0.27)
Months since HIV diagnosis 0.026 0.604
CD4+ T cell count 0.123 0.014
Number of OI past 6 months −0.101 0.044
Depressive symptomatology
 No 0.4 (0.31) 0.191
 Yes 0.35 (0.26)
Social support
Emotional support 0.247 < 0.001
Tangible support 0.197 < 0.001
Positive interactions 0.251 < 0.001
Affectionate support 0.174 < 0.001
Total social support 0.237 < 0.001
Any social support
 No 0.33 (0.3) < 0.001
 Yes 0.44 (0.29)
Any close friends or relatives
 No 0.34 (0.29) < 0.001
 Yes 0.44 (0.3)
Internalized stigma −0.191 < 0.001
Food insecurity −0.088 0.080

Note. OI = opportunistic infection(s).

Multivariate Model

As depicted in Table 4, variables correlated with QOL in the bivariate analysis with p < .2 were evaluated using linear regression models. In the final model, greater QOL was found to be significantly associated with higher CD4+ T cells (+10 cells/mm3; b = .0011, p = .021), and greater social support (b = .260, p < .0001). Further, lower QOL was found to be significantly associated with internalized stigma (b = −.232, p < .0001). Marital status and number of OIs were no longer significant in the final model.

Table 4.

Multiple Linear Regression Analysis

Bivariate models Final multivariable model
Variable β Standard error P β Standard error P
Age in years −0.0021 0.0023 0.3575
Marital status (vs. married)
Divorced/separated −0.1129 0.0585 0.0544
Widowed −0.0518 0.0318 0.1043
Religion (vs. Hindu)
Muslim −0.1117 0.0547 0.0419
Christian 0.0063 0.0389 0.8715
CD4+ T cell count (+10 cells/mm3) 0.0012 0.0005 0.0238 0.0011 0.0005 0.0212
Number of OIs −0.0359 0.0116 0.0021
Depressive symptomatology −0.0504 0.0347 0.1467
Total social support 0.3768 0.0535 < 0.0001 0.2597 0.0579 <0.0001
Any close friends or relatives 0.1078 0.0301 0.0004
Internalized stigma −0.3305 0.0486 < 0.0001 −0.2319 0.0523 <0.0001
Food insecurity −0.0155 0.0038 < 0.0001

Note. OI = opportunistic infection(s).

Discussion

Our cross-sectional study described QOL among WLWH in rural Andhra Pradesh, India. As highlighted by these data, rural WLWH encountered distinct barriers to care that could impose significant consequences on QOL. Furthermore, participants’ limited sources of social support, as well as their perceived poor physical and mental health, may have resulted in a universally poor overall QOL. Final multivariate modeling revealed that higher QOL was significantly related to higher CD4+ T cell count and greater social support. Alternatively, lower QOL was significantly related to experiencing internalized stigma.

More than half of the study participants were widowed and without any formal education. Moreover, more than 40% had CD4+ T cell counts of 350 cells/mm3 or lower, while virtually all participants reported experiencing physical symptoms and/or OIs. To compound the problem, mean adherence to the ART regimen was found to be only 30%. High prevalence of various OIs may be attributed to geographic inaccessibility, as travel to health clinics, which were primarily located in cities, could be costly and required several hours of travel each way (Nyamathi, Sinha, et al., 2011).

Our findings revealed a significant association between higher QOL and higher CD4+ T cell count. Early diagnosis, linkage to care, and retention in high quality HIV care, including access to ART and support for ART adherence, are needed to achieve higher CD4+ T cell counts and improved health outcomes. Adherence to an ART regimen can strongly influence perceived state of health, and result in high levels of QOL. Alternatively, perceived state of health and QOL may influence adherence to treatment.

More than half of our participants reported having no individuals on whom they could depend for social support; moreover, the experience of internalized stigma was high. Being widowed as a result of HIV and high levels of stigma surrounding HIV in Andhra Pradesh may have accounted for low scores in social well-being (Nyamathi et al., 2013), which may likewise have impacted QOL. As other studies have also revealed the significant relationship of social support to greater adherence to ART (Kelly, Hartman, Graham, Kallen, & Giordano, 2014; Nyamathi et al., 2012), strategies to increase levels of emotional, tangible, and other types of social support are of high importance to improve both QOL and adherence to ART. Knowledge gained from our study can inform research and treatment that addresses ways to secure social support and strategies to improve adherence to ART and to mitigate experiences of internalized stigma.

While not significant in the multivariable model, participants reported significant insecurity about food availability, a QOL concern that is perhaps more disquieting in rural communities that are directly affected by negative environmental events such as pests and droughts (Heylen et al., 2015). With increasing rates of food insecurity, local governments can institute programs that allocate food to WLWH who are in need, and community physicians and nurses can inform WLWH about existing food programs. For example, in Andhra Pradesh, the government sells 35 kg of rice per HIV-affected family, only for persons showing an HIV card. As WLWH are among the most impoverished citizens in Andhra Pradesh, interventions are needed to combat this disparity.

Limitations

The unique cultural and geographic concerns of WLWH in Andhra Pradesh may confound attempts to extrapolate our data to different communities, especially those outside of rural India. Additionally, the cross-sectional nature of the analyses precluded any conclusions of causality between the variables. Furthermore, when interpreting the multivariate results, one needs to keep in mind the limited range of very low QOL and social support actually observed in this sample, which limits conclusions about variables associated with high levels of QOL and potentially also limits generalizability of the findings.

Conclusions

Our findings underscored the severe lack of quality and social support, as well as high levels of depression and internalized stigma for these rural WLWH. We found strong positive associations between QOL and CD4+ T cell count and social support. QOL was negatively associated with internalized stigma. Future interventions to improve QOL for WLWH should incorporate strategies to improve social support, improve adherence to ART, and decrease the experience of stigma. Research is needed to assess the efficacy of health services that are comprehensive and culturally sensitive in dealing with stigma, treatment of physical and mental health, and social support at the primary health clinics.

Key Considerations.

  • Rural women living with HIV in India encounter distinct barriers to care that may impose significant consequences on quality of life (QOL).

  • Participants’ limited sources of social support, as well as their perceived poor physical and mental health, may have resulted in a poor overall QOL.

  • Higher QOL was significantly related to higher CD4+ T cell count and greater social support.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the National Institute on Mental Health NIMH098729.

Footnotes

Disclosures

The authors report no real or perceived vested interests that relate to this article that could be construed as a conflict of interest.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Contributor Information

Adeline M. Nyamathi, Professor and Founding Dean, University of California, Irvine, School of Nursing, Irvine, California, USA.

Maria Ekstrand, Professor, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, San Francisco, California, USA.

Kartik Yadav, Project Director, University of California at Los Angeles, School of Nursing, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Padma Ramakrishna, Project Manager, Asha Nutrition Project, Nellore, India.

Elsa Heylen, Statistician, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, San Francisco, California, USA.

Catherine Carpenter, Adjunct Professor, University of California at Los Angeles, School of Nursing, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Sarah Wall, Graduate student, University of California, Los Angeles, School of Nursing, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Tanya Oleskowicz, Graduate student, University of California, Los Angeles, School of Nursing, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Lenore Arab, Professor, University of California, Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Biological Chemistry, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Sanjeev Sinha, Professor, Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

References

  1. Ackerson LK, Ramanadhan S, Arya M, Viswanath K. Social disparities, communication inequalities, and HIV/AIDS-related knowledge and attitudes in India. AIDS & Behavior. 2012;16(7):2072–2081. doi: 10.1007/s10461-011-0031-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amin A. Risk, morality, and blame: A critical analysis of government and U.S. donor responses to HIV infections among sex workers in India. 2004 Retrieved from http://www.genderhealth.org/publications.php?TOPIC=RSC#gbv.
  3. Chandra PS, Satyanarayana VA, Satishchandra P, Satish KS, Kumar M. Do men and women with HIV differ in their quality of life? A study from South India. AIDS & Behavior. 2009;13(1):110–117. doi: 10.1007/s10461-008-9434-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Charles B, Jeyaseelan L, Pandian AK, Sam AE, Thenmozhi M, Jayaseelan V. Association between stigma, depression and quality of life of people living with HIV/AIDS (PLHA) in South India - a community based cross sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:463. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Coates J, Swindale A, Bilinsky P. Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) for measurement of household food access: Indicator guide (v.3) 2007 Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/eufao-fsi4dm/doc-training/hfias.pdf.
  6. Directorate of Economics and Statistics. Statistical abstract Andhra Pradesh. 2015 Retrieved from http://desap.cgg.gov.in/jsp/website/gallery/Statistical%20Abstract%202015.pdf.
  7. Ekstrand M, Solomon D, Gopalkrishnan S, Krishnan AK, Kumarasamy N. Alcohol use, partner violence and sexual risk among South India female sex workers: Implications for interventions. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Alcohol and HIV; New Delhi. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ekstrand ML, Bharat S, Ramakrishna J, Heylen E. Blame, symbolic stigma and HIV misconceptions are associated with support for coercive measures in urban India. AIDS & Behavior. 2012;16(3):700–710. doi: 10.1007/s10461-011-9888-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ekstrand ML, Chandy S, Heylen E, Steward W, Singh G. Developing useful highly active antiretroviral therapy adherence measures for India: The Prerana study. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome. 2010;53(3):415–416. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181ba3e4e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ekstrand ML, Shet A, Chandy S, Singh G, Shamsundar R, Madhavan V, … Kumarasamy N. Suboptimal adherence associated with virological failure and resistance mutations to first-line highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in Bangalore, India. International Health. 2011;3(1):27–34. doi: 10.1016/j.inhe.2010.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Endicott J, Nee J, Harrison W, Blumenthal R. Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire: A new measure. Psychopharmacology Bulletin. 1993;29(2):321–326. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0566-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ghosh P, Arah OA, Talukdar A, Sur D, Babu GR, Sengupta P, Detels R. Factors associated with HIV infection among Indian women. International Journal of STDs & AIDS. 2011;22(3):140–145. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2010.010127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Giordano TP, Guzman D, Clark R, Charlebois ED, Bangsberg DR. Measuring adherence to antiretroviral therapy in a diverse population using a visual analogue scale. HIV Clinical Trials. 2004;5(2):74–79. doi: 10.1310/JFXH-G3X2-EYM6-D6UG. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gupta RN, Wyatt GE, Swaminathan S, Rewari BB, Locke TF, Ranganath V, … Liu H. Correlates of relationship, psychological, and sexual behavioral factors for HIV risk among Indian women. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology. 2008;14(3):256–265. doi: 10.1037/1099-9809.14.3.256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Heylen E, Panicker ST, Chandy S, Steward WT, Ekstrand ML. Food insecurity and its relation to psychological well-being among South Indian people living with HIV. AIDS & Behavior. 2015;19(8):1548–1558. doi: 10.1007/s10461-014-0966-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jackson EA, Krishnan S, Meccone N, Ockene IS, Rubenfire M. Perceived quality of care and lifestyle counseling among patients with heart disease. Clinical Cardiology. 2010;33(12):765–769. doi: 10.1002/clc.20839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. The GAP report. 2014 Retrieved from http://files.unaids.org/en/media/unaids/contentassets/documents/unaidspublication/2014/UNAIDS_Gap_report_en.pdf.
  18. Kelly JD, Hartman C, Graham J, Kallen MA, Giordano TP. Social support as a predictor of early diagnosis, linkage, retention, and adherence to HIV care: Results from the Steps Study. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care. 2014;25(5):405–413. doi: 10.1016/j.jana.2013.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kleinman NJ, Manhart LE, Mohanraj R, Kumar S, Jeyaseelan L, Rao D, Simoni JM. Antiretroviral therapy adherence measurement in non-clinical settings in South India. AIDS Care. 2015;27(2):248–254. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2014.946382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee YT, Liu SI, Huang HC, Sun FJ, Huang CR, Yeung A. Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Short Form of Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q-SF) Quality Life Research. 2014;23(3):907–916. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0528-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mahalakshmy T, Premarajan K, Hamide A. Quality of life and its determinants in people living with human immunodeficiency virus infection in Puducherry, India. Indian Journal of Community Medicine. 2011;36(3):203–207. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.86521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Marin G, Marin BV. Research with Hispanic populations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1991. [Google Scholar]
  23. National AIDS Control Organization. India HIV estimations 2015. Technical report. 2015 Retrieved from http://naco.gov.in/upload/2015%20MSLNS/HSS/India%20HIV%20Estimations%202015.pdf.
  24. Nyamathi A. Comprehensive health seeking and coping paradigm. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1989;14(4):281–290. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1989.tb03415.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nyamathi A, Ekstrand M, Salem BE, Sinha S, Ganguly KK, Leake B. Impact of Asha intervention on stigma among rural Indian women with AIDS. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 2013;35(7):867–883. doi: 10.1177/0193945913482050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nyamathi A, Ekstrand M, Srivastava N, Carpenter CL, Salem BE, Al-Harrasi S, … Sinha S. ASHA-life intervention perspectives voiced by rural Indian women living with AIDS. Health Care for Women International. 2016;37(4):412–425. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2015.1066790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Nyamathi A, Hanson AY, Salem BE, Sinha S, Ganguly KK, Leake B, … Marfisee M. Impact of a rural village women (Asha) intervention on adherence to antiretroviral therapy in southern India. Nursing Research. 2012;61(5):353–362. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e31825fe3ef. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nyamathi A, Heravian A, Zolt-Gilburne J, Sinha S, Ganguly K, Liu E, … Leake B. Correlates of depression among rural women living with AIDS in Southern India. Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 2011;32(6):385–391. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2011.577269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nyamathi A, Salem B, Meyer V, Ganguly K, Sinha S, Ramakrishnan P. Impact of an ASHA intervention on depressive symptoms among rural women living with AIDS in India: Comparison of the ASHA life and usual care program. AIDS Education & Prevention. 2012;24(3):280–293. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2012.24.3.280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Nyamathi AM, Sinha S, Ganguly KK, William RR, Heravian A, Ramakrishnan P, … Rao PV. Challenges experienced by rural women in India living with AIDS and implications for the delivery of HIV/AIDS care. Health Care for Women International. 2011;32(4):300–313. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2010.536282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Pallikadavath S, Garda L, Apte H, Freedman J, Stones RW. HIV/AIDS in rural India: Context and health care needs. Journal of Biosocial Science. 2005;37(5):641–655. doi: 10.1017/S0021932004006893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Pasricha SR, Black J, Muthayya S, Shet A, Bhat V, Nagaraj S, … Shet AS. Determinants of anemia among young children in rural India. Pediatrics. 2010;126(1):e140–e149. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-3108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Radloff L. The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurements. 1977;1:385–401. doi: 10.1177/014662167700100306. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ritsner M, Kurs R, Kostizky H, Ponizovsky A, Modai I. Subjective quality of life in severely mentally ill patients: A comparison of two instruments. Quality Life Research. 2002;11(6):553–561. doi: 10.1023/A:1016323009671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rogers A, Meundi A, Amma A, Rao A, Shetty P, Antony J, … Shetty AK. HIV-related knowledge, attitudes, perceived benefits, and risks of HIV testing among pregnant women in rural Southern India. AIDS Patient Care & STDs. 2006;20(11):803–811. doi: 10.1089/apc.2006.20.803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Rossi A, Rucci P, Mauri M, Maina G, Pieraccini F, Pallanti S, Endicott J. Validity and reliability of the Italian version of the Quality of Life, Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire. Quality Life Research. 2005;14(10):2323–2328. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-7387-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL. The MOS social support survey. Social Science & Medicine. 1991;32(6):705–714. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90150-B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sinha G, Peters DH, Bollinger RC. Strategies for gender-equitable HIV services in rural India. Health Policy Plan. 2009;24(3):197–208. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czp004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Steward WT, Chandy S, Singh G, Panicker ST, Osmand TA, Heylen E, Ekstrand ML. Depression is not an inevitable outcome of disclosure avoidance: HIV stigma and mental health in a cohort of HIV-infected individuals from Southern India. Psychological Health Medicine. 2011;16(1):74–85. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2010.521568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Steward WT, Herek GM, Ramakrishna J, Bharat S, Chandy S, Wrubel J, Ekstrand ML. HIV-related stigma: Adapting a theoretical framework for use in India. Social Science & Medicine. 2008;67(8):1225–1235. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.05.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Subramanian T, Gupte MD, Ezhil R. AIDS: An understanding in rural women of South-India. Indian Journal of Sexually Transmitted Diseases & AIDS. 2007;28(1):10–14. [Google Scholar]
  42. Tsai AC, Bangsberg DR, Emenyonu N, Senkungu JK, Martin JN, Weiser SD. The social context of food insecurity among persons living with HIV/AIDS in rural Uganda. Social Science & Medicine. 2011;73(12):1717–1724. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.09.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Van Rompay KK, Madhivanan P, Rafiq M, Krupp K, Chakrapani V, Selvam D. Empowering the people: Development of an HIV peer education model for low literacy rural communities in India. Human Resources for Health. 2008;6:6. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-6-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Vargas Puello V, Alvarado Orellana S, Atalah Samur E. Food insecurity among elderly people in 15 districts of the Great Santiago area; An unresolved issue. Nutricion Hospitalaria. 2013;28(5):1430–1437. doi: 10.3305/nh.2013.28.5.6663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Vigneshwaran E, Padmanabhareddy Y, Devanna N, Alvarez-Uria G. Gender differences in health related quality of life of people living with HIV/AIDS in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. North American Journal of Medical Science. 2013;5(2):102–107. doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.107526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Weiser SD, Young SL, Cohen CR, Kushel MB, Tsai AC, Tien PC, … Bangsberg DR. Conceptual framework for understanding the bidirectional links between food insecurity and HIV/AIDS. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2011;94(6):1729S–1739S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.012070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1995;273(1):59–65. doi: 10.1001/jama.273.1.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zelaya CE, Sivaram S, Johnson SC, Srikrishnan AK, Suniti S, Celentano DD. Measurement of self, experienced, and perceived HIV/AIDS stigma using parallel scales in Chennai, India. AIDS Care. 2012;24(7):846–855. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2011.647674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhang W, O'Brien N, Forrest JI, Salters KA, Patterson TL, Montaner JS, … Lima VD. Validating a shortened depression scale (10 item CES-D) among HIV-positive people in British Columbia, Canada. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES