Sir,
The most important features of a natural reconstructed nipple are symmetry and a durable valid vertical projection. A frequent drawback of the methods currently used for nipple reconstruction is the loss of nipple projection in the longer post-operative term. Although numerous nipple-areolar complex reconstruction techniques have been described,[1,2,3] common among these techniques is a failure to maintain a nipple projection over time (estimated at 17%–75%), and difficulties related to maintenance of nipple projection have been well documented.[4]
As proposed by Caterson et al. for nipple-areolar projection,[1] we present a surgical technique that uses a purse-string to increase nipple projection.
Our surgical procedure is carried out under local anaesthesia (mepivacaine 2%); first, using the contralateral nipple diameter as a template, we made 6–8 small triangular skin incisions with an 11 blade scalpel; the incision of each triangle's base is equally spaced 2 mm outside the desired nipple diameter. These triangle-shaped areas are deepithelialised; then, through an incision site, a purse-string suture (cervical visor-3 Gore-Tex) on a straight needle is subsequently inserted and continued through all the incisions and is placed within the deep dermis [Figure 1]. This suture material is uniquely suited due to the following property: it is strong and permanent, and it slides very easily through the tough dermal layer. Gentle traction is applied until there is good projection, and the purse-string suture is tied under moderate tension. The wounds are closed in double layers.
A ‘donut’ dressing is applied to avoid compression of the nipple for 4 months postoperatively.
In our clinic, this method was used with nine women (one bilateral case and eight unilateral cases of loss of nipple projection). They were no cases of infection, nipple ischaemia or other complications.
No permanent sutures required removal for infection or exposure.
Our experience using this technique has provided a stable projection of the nipple with at least 1-year follow-up represented in pre- and post-operative photographs, as shown in Figure 2. There were no deformities of the nipples or the areolas after this procedure and no decrease in the nipples or areolas size; the triangular vertical skin excisions around the nipple avoid the skin excess during the nipple lift.
This method is very simple in concept and procedure without a complicated design; it does not require another donor region or advanced skill. This procedure is a speedy and reliable method for restoring the loss of nipple projection.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Caterson SA, Singh M, Talbot SG, Eriksson E. Reconstruction of areolar projection using a purse-string suture technique. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015;3:e453. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Germanò D, De Biasio F, Piedimonte A, Parodi PC. Nipple reconstruction using the fleur-de-lis flap technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2006;30:399–402. doi: 10.1007/s00266-005-0199-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mohamed SA, Parodi PC. A modified technique for nipple-areola complex reconstruction. Indian J Plast Surg. 2011;44:76–80. doi: 10.4103/0970-0358.81450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Few JW, Marcus JR, Casas LA, Aitken ME, Redding J. Long-term predictable nipple projection following reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:1321–4. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199910000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]