Skip to main content
Bioengineered logoLink to Bioengineered
. 2016 Aug 17;8(3):239–247. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2016.1223413

Kinetic analysis of IgM monoclonal antibodies for determination of dengue sample concentration using SPR technique

Peyman Jahanshahi a,b,, Qin Wei a, Zhang Jie a, Mostafa Ghomeishi b, Shamala Devi Sekaran c, Faisal Rafiq Mahamd Adikan b
PMCID: PMC5470514  PMID: 27533620

ABSTRACT

Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensing is recently emerging as a valuable technique for measuring the binding constants, association and dissociation rate constants, and stoichimetry for a binding interaction kinetics in a number of emerging biological areas. This technique can be applied to the study of immune system diseases in order to contribute to improved understanding and evaluation of binding parameters for a variety of interactions between antigens and antibodies biochemically and clinically. Since the binding constants determination of an anti-protein dengue antibody (Ab) to a protein dengue antigen (Ag) is mostly complicated, the SPR technique aids a determination of binding parameters directly for a variety of particular dengue Ag_Ab interactions in the real-time. The study highlights the doctrine of real-time dengue Ag_Ab interaction kinetics as well as to determine the binding parameters that is performed with SPR technique. In addition, this article presents a precise prediction as a reference curve for determination of dengue sample concentration.

KEYWORDS: biosensor, dengue virus, kinetic analysis, surface plasmon resonance

Introduction

Existing biochemistry techniques for biomolecular detection, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA),1-3 polymer chain reaction (PCR),4-6 and fluoroimmuno assay (FIA)7,8 are complicated, tedious and time-consuming. These methods require specific reagents and labels for biomolecular detection.9-11 Biosensors that can rapidly diagnose and have high-sensitivity detection capabilities for different types of biomolecules are thus very much desired in the field of life sciences.

Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensors12-14 have been extensively utilized to specifically detect certain biological molecules in liquid mediums for medical diagnosis.15,16 In describing the function of SPR biosensors, the binding of ligand and analyte leads to real-time refractive index changes in the reflected light, which directly represents the change in ligand-analyte binding interaction quantity.17-20 In this experimental technique, finding the affinity (binding constant) of an antibody is substantially important for optimization of such a work. These basic parameters are useful in different studies, for instance, thermodynamic study of the Ag_Ab interaction in molecular basis or using antibodies as conformational probes. These binding information may lead to calculation of their topology and concentration measurement of antigens which are active biologically.21,22

Different experimental studies have been done to ease the computation of binding parameters, such as, the kinetic parameter for the interaction between Ags and Abs or the dissociation constant. Among these approaches, separation of free reactants and bound reactants are more preferred.23,24

There are some reports of using SPR method in binding parameters measurements in which both qualitative and quantitative applications were involved. Among them, active molecular concentration, association and disassociation rates (ka, kd), and binding constants can be named which ultimately leads toward the finding of thermodynamic information of under experiment medium. In addition, after completion of first experiment, the SPR biosensors can be applied to finding the mechanism of binding interaction and its stoichiometry.22,25,26

Biacore configuration and SPR chip construction

Biacore 3000 from GE Healthcare is a real-time system for biomolecular interaction analysis using SPR technique.27-29 With this method it is possible to monitor the formation and dissociation of biomolecular complexes on chip surfaces. CM5 (carboxymethyl dextran matrix) is served as a biochip for this research.30 The CM5 is a particular chip of this system for numerous detections in microbiological areas.

According to this biosensor structure that is based on the Kretschmann configuration, a glass surface covered with a gold thin film provided the physical conditions for producing the surface plasmon resonance signal. Gold and silver are the most suited metals for surface plasmon resonance sensing. Silver has better surface plasmon resonance characteristics than gold, because of the larger real part of its dielectric constant.31 However, silver has poor long-term stability. Gold is more environmentally stable, is chemically more inert, has lower reactivity, does not react with commonly used fluids such as water and alcohols, and is compatible with a wide range of chemicals. Since gold was utilized in the CM5 chip as a metal layer, all assays are examined through this biosensor in the research.

According to the CM5 structure, there is a carboxymethyl-dextran matrix acting as a linker layer with 100 nm thickness. An inert hydrophilic environment which is suitable for the most biomolecular interactions is relatively provided by this matrix. Also, the immobilization is efficiently done from dilute solutions.32,33 N-ethyl-N-(dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC) and N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) are intended to activate the biosensor surface before sample injection. Ethanolamine and 10 mM glycine-HCI with pH 2.0 are the washing solutions for removing particle that binds to the sensor surface and completing the immobilization procedure. For sample dilution, 10 mM buffer (pH 4.5 sodium acetate) is used in the samples that obtains an adequate concentration.34,35

A baseline of resonance signal was primarily determined by washing the surface with buffer having a fixed amount of bound ligand. The analyte was subsequently added to this buffer flow. Binding of analyte to the immobilized ligand caused a rise in refractive index of chip surface, thereby changing the SPR angle which is directly proportional to the number of ligand-analyte pairs. Changing SPR angle is named the resonance units (RU) as presented in Fig. 1A, where 1000RU corresponds to a change of angle ≈0.1° and 1RU corresponds to a change of refractive index ≈1 × 10−6. It should be noted that if an analyte does not attach to the immobilized ligand, there is no variation in the SPR angle. Otherwise the bound analyte produces a positive SPR signal in the sensorgram (Fig. 1B).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Schematic diagram describing the interaction of Ab with Ag on the chip surface; curve (A) schematic response signal, showing association (I), equilibrium (II) and dissociation phases of each resonance signal, and curve (B) changing refractive index at the sensor surface, which are caused by the concentration's change of sample medium when the antibodies (Abs) attach to the immobilized antigens.

Nowadays, the global prevalence of dengue fever are dramatically growing and the rapid dengue diagnostic tests have been developed beside of dengue vaccines.36,37 In present study, an antigen represents a molecule attached to the sensor chip's surface, which is serotype 2 of the dengue virus (DENV2), and the dengue 2 specific monoclonal antibody is examined as a sample applied at various concentrations. Here, thorough description of the quantitative expression and evaluation of binding constants for Ag_Ab interaction kinetics are theoretically expressed and then employed to achieve the dengue Ag_Ab interaction kinetics. Subsequently, after calculation of all binding parameters, we obtain an approximate linear plot which aims to determine a concentration of each patient sample.

Results and discussion

The antigen immobilization site was characterized using atomic force microscopy (AFM); model VEECO DIMENSION 3000. The AFM machine imaged the chip surface in contact mode with 0.01–0.025 Ohm-cm antimony (n)-doped silicon probe. The presence of immobilized antigens was clarified through a 3 dimensional AFM image (Fig. 2). The AFM image shows a top view of the chip surface which presents 2 types of different peaks. Since the amine groups have been already adhered upon gold layer, the homogenous and low peaks reveal the amine groups and second, higher sporadic peaks reveal the immobilized antigens (ligands) on the chip surface. The amine groups have a role of binding protein to antigen, which attached very well to the surface of chip.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Characterization of the chip surface using the AFM machine.

Presentation of output

Evaluating both kinetic and equilibrium situations were studied to determine the sample concentration with the particular conditions. The assays were examined in similar environmental variables (e.g. same temperature and buffers) and used the dengue monoclonal antibodies as a sample, but, with different concentrations. The sample was diluted to concentrations of 1:400, 1:200, 1:100, 1:50, and 1:25 by adding 10 mM sodium acetate solvent with pH 4.5. Then 100 µl sample volume was injected on the chip surface with 30 µl/min flow rate.

The sensorgrams (resonance signal versus time) were collected at several different concentrations of injected samples. In subsequent concentrations (Fig. 3), a high quantity of dengue monoclonal antibodies at a 1:25 concentration caused sudden, rapid saturation in the binding phase between antibodies and antigens at the chip surface. This concentration was chosen to end the data collecting.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Surface plasmon resonance analysis of the dengue Ag_Ab interactions in various concentrations.

Data analysis

The representative sensorgrams were derived from injection of different concentrations of dengue monoclonal antibody samples. The plot dR/dt vs. R of each concentration was presented in Fig. 4. According to the association kinetics analysis, the slope of plot dR/dt versus R gives the value of S (equation 5) for each concentration. Since the density of engaged monoclonal antibody is 0.85 nM, the concentration (C) of 1:400, 1:200, 1:100, 1:50, and 1:25 are 2.125 pM, 4.25 pM, 8.5 pM, 17 pM, and 34 pM respectively.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

The plot dR/dt vs. RU of each concentration for interaction-controlled kinetics.

With regards to Fig. 4, the values for S were found for each concentration and fitted with linear regression model in Fig. 5. According to equation 5, the association rate constant (ka) and dissociation rate constant (kd) of monoclonal dengue antibody were determined 13.2 × 109 M−1s−1 and 2.8 × 10−2s−1 respectively from the plot S against C (Fig. 5). In addition, the association constant KA and disassociation constant KD of monoclonal dengue antibody were obtained 4.71 × 1011 pM−1 and 2.12 × 10−12nM respectively.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Plot of slope value S vs. Ab concentration.

By considering the binding response in equilibrium condition against dengue sample concentration, equation (6) can be fitted according to monoclonal antibody concentration data which is shown in Fig. 6. This curve, as a reference, can determine the concentration of each sample and also the maximum binding response (Rmax) at the equilibrium condition. Based on Fig. 6, the Rmax has been determined 20×103 RU. In addition, Δ represents the correction shift from the baseline.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Plot of the binding response deviation versus Ab concentration.

Case study

Serums from infected patients to the dengue virus were diluted at different concentrations of dengue antibodies through laboratorial enzyme-linked-immune-sorbent assay (ELISA) method (low positive (LP); positive/negative (P/N) ratio of = 2 and < 3, mid positive (MP); P/N ratio of = 3 and < 5, and highly positive (HP); P/N ratio of = 5 and > 5). It is obvious that the P/N ratio of < 2 is a definitive negative case. According to the Table 1, P/N ratio, NS1, and IgM results of each patient serum were presented via the ELISA method. According to this method, the positive IgM results a proving the presence of the dengue virus, and the P/N ratio shows the IgM antibody quantity in each sample. In addition, the positive result of NS1 test indicates the presence of dengue virus in blood, but, its negative result indicates the late examination of the sample. In addition, each sample was examined using SPR Biacore machine for determination of binding signal variation (Table 1). Therefore, by having concentration reference curve (Fig. 6), simply the dengue antibody concentration (CAb) was interpolated based on the obtained binding signal variation of each patient serum.

Table 1.

The patient serum data with biosensor results.

  ELISA results Biosensor results
Type of sample P/N ratio NS1 IgM ΔR(RU) CAb(pM)
LP 2.47 + + 6,560 0.84
MP 3.75 + + 9,380 1.87
HP 7.38 − + 12,782 3.76

Conclusion

In this research, the SPR technique was applied for biomolecular interaction analysis. The binding constant and stoichiometry data of dengue Ag_Ab interaction were calculated properly. Basically, SPR technique has been employed to evaluate the intrinsic affinities along with determination of rate constants for binding dengue antibody to its antigen. This study was demonstrated the SPR technique can remarkably detect and quantify the binding of dengue monoclonal antibodies to the chip surface. At the end, a reference plot for determination of sample concentration was obtained by different dengue monoclonal antibody concentrations.

Methods and materials

Principle of Ag_Ab interaction kinetics in real-time

In biosensors which are based on the SPR technique, one of reactants as a probe (Ag) is immobilized on the sensor surface and another reactant as target (Ab) is suspended into a liquid sample and flowed to the chip surface. The suspended target reacts with the immobilized probe and binds to each other if the target is its relevant probe (Fig. 7). Change in the SPR signal at resonance units (RU) graph due to the bound Ag_Ab, is plotted as a function of time (Fig. 7, curve (a)). Through this graph, the binding kinetics of Ag_Ab interaction is obtained. The formation of surface-bound Ag_Ab between target Ab and the immobilized Ag on the surface, can be represented as

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

(A) Sensorgram plot that shows affinity and kinetic measurement of Ag_Ab interaction, (B) plot Req/C vs. Req at different concentrations of sample, and (C) plot of slope value S versus Ab concentration.

Inline graphic                    (1) where km is defined as a rate constant of mass transport to and from the chip surface. Since the rate constant is the same for mass transport, in both directions, the rate is equal. The association and dissociation rate constants are defined as ka and kd for formation of Ag_Ab complex respectively.22

In an ideal situation, the Ab transport to the chip surface and its transport on the linker layer would not affect the binding kinetics. This occurs when the flow rate is quickly compared with binding. In this case, the sample (that includes Ab) concentration quickly becomes constant in time and uniform in space. It will equal to the concentration of injection ([B]o) in a bulk phase. In addition, the measured forward and backward rate constants approach to the constants of binding interaction kinetics.22 According to mentioned conditions, the complex formation rate can be depicted as

d[Ag_Ab]/dt=ka[Ab]([Ag]o[Ag_Ab])kd[Ag_Ab] (2)

where [Ag_Ab] is a quantity of bound target, [Ab] is a quantity of unbound target, [Ag]o is the whole quantity of probe (Ag) on a chip surface. The rates of association/dissociation binding are clearly observable and the binding parameters will be obtained in the following.

If all number of probe is stated as a maximum target binding capacity on the surface, the concentration conditions can formerly be named as the SPR response signal R. Under pseudo 1st-order conditions that the unbound target concentration, as a constant, is retained in the flow cell. The binding equation can be defined as

dR/dt=kaC(RmaxR)kdR (3)

where dR/dt represents the changing rate in the response signal. In this equation, R and Rmax come from measured and maximum response signals in each binding. The value C comes from the injected target concentration (M), constant ka is an association rate (M−1s−1) and constant kd is a dissociation rate (s−1). Fig. 7A presents a scheme of response signal along with the defined parameters. According to equation 3, it can be rearranged for having an association kinetics analysis as:

dR/dt=kaCRmax(kaC+kd)R (4)

Therefore, the plot dR/dt vs. R is theoretically obtained as a straight line with slope −(kaC +kd) for kinetics of the Ag_Ab interaction. At R=0 as initial binding rate is directly proportional to the sample concentration which can be used in concentration measurements. Through a single association response signal, the constants ka and kd can be specified if Rmax is known. For determination of constant Rmax experimentally, a high concentration of sample is examined to fully saturate the response signal. The desirable methodology is to acquire the sensorgram for different sample concentrations. To analyze the association and disassociation rates, the graph of changes in the total SPR response signal dR/dt versus R produces a value S as a slope of the response signal which relates the association and dissociation rates. It can be defined as:

S=kaC+kd (5)

According to the Fig. 7B, the association constant KA, can be calculated as KA = ka/kd(M−1). At equilibrium state, dR/dt= 0 and equation (3) can be reformulated as:

ReqC=KARmaxKAReq (6)

Therefore, the steady state association constant KA can be found from a plot of Req/C vs. Req and the dissociation constant KD can be calculated as 1/KA. On the other hand, a plot of S vs. C is a straight line with slope ka (Fig. 7C). In theory, the intercept on the vertical axis (C = 0) delivers kd, but in practice, this cannot be used as a reliable measure of a dissociation rate constant if there is kaC >> kd. The dissociation is calculated by:

lnR0Rt=kd(tt0)  (7)

where R0 is defined as an initial response level at to. The variable R and t represent the values acquired through the dissociation curve.22

As a description of SPR method functionally, the incident laser light is reflected inside the prism which is usually coated with a thin gold layer from the outside. At a critical incident angle, an electron resonant oscillation appears on the surface of gold layer which results in sudden decrease of reflected light intensity. Since the critical angle varies in the different materials presented on the metal surface, causing the changes in refractive index of medium, this method has been utilized to measure biomolecular interactions at liquid-solid interface. In this method ligands were immobilized to the surface of sensor and analyte flows past this surface to interact and form a complex. A SPR response signal is generated just after interaction and can be observed in the real-time. Changing of refractive index in the immobilized ligands, which is related to the changing of adsorbed mass, affect the SPR biosensor. Hence, it can detect the targets interacting with the probe that is immobilized on the sensor chip.

Basically when samples containing the relevant antibody is injected on an immobilized antigen surface in a cycle of experiment, the resulting sensorgram can be divided into 3 essential phases: first is the association of Ab with Ag which takes place during the injection of sample; second is the steady-state phase or equilibrium at the end of injection, where the Ab binding rate is balanced; and third is the dissociation of Ab from the chip surface that takes place during buffer flow.

Sample collection

The monoclonal antibody samples for this research were provided by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). In addition, blood specimens were obtained from the University Malaya Medical Center. The approval study protocol was provided by the institutional review board of the University of Malaya Medical Center (Ethics no. 782.90). The patients' consent and asymptomatic donors were obtained prior to blood collection, and the study was conducted in accordance with the “Declaration of Helsinki.”

Ligand immobilization

In our experiment, 6 µl of dengue antigen (serotype 2) was diluted with 194 µl acetate buffer, which was immobilized on the surface of the Biacore chip. It should be noted that the titer of dengue virus serotype 2 (DENV2) used for this study, was obtained 2 × 105 pfu/ml as ligand concentration. The EDC and NHS were utilized to activate the surface of chip via a mixture of 120 μl EDC and 120 μl NHS to produce reactive succinimide esters. The loose ligands were removed by specific buffers on the chip surface subsequently. Deactivation and taking off all loose associated ligands were carried out by 80 μl ethanolamine solution and 500 μl 10 mM glycine-HCI buffer with pH 2.0. In addition, the flow rate of immobilization process was adjusted on 10 µl/min.

Upon sensor surface construction, the experiments were conducted by exposing the surface to each concentrated serum containing IgM antibody. The dengue IgM antibody began to bind once the serum was introduced to the sensor surface – a process that continued while an equilibrium position took place between the serum antibody concentration and immobilized dengue antigen concentration. At this point, the process of binding was studied by replacing the liquid phase with the buffer and recording the dissociation of attached antibodies until an equilibrium ratio between dengue IgM antibodies and immobilized antigens was achieved. These basic phases of association and dissociation can be performed at different serum concentrations to examine the concentration effect has on the time-dependent diagnostic process for the dengue fever.

Funding Statement

This work has been supported by National Science Foundation of China (No. 51435009), University of Malaya High Impact Research Grant UM.0000005/HIR.C1, and MOHE UM.C/625/1/HIR/H-20001-00-E000053.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Acknowledgments

The authors should appreciate University Malaya Medical Center for providing samples.

References

  • [1].Yin X, Lv R, Chen X, Liu M, Hua R, Zhang Y. Detection of specific antibodies against tembusu virus in ducks by use of an E protein-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Clin Microbiol 2013; 51:2400-2; PMID:23616462; https://doi.org/ 10.1128/JCM.00361-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Mullis CE, Laeyendecker O, Reynolds SJ, Ocama P, Quinn J, Boaz I, Gray RH, Kirk GD, Thomas DL, Quinn TC, et al.. High frequency of false-positive hepatitis C virus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in rakai, uganda. Clin Infect Dis 2013; 57:1747-50; PMID:24051866; https://doi.org/ 10.1093/cid/cit602 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Wang SM, Sekaran SD. Evaluation of a commercial SD dengue virus NS1 antigen capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit for early diagnosis of dengue virus infection. J Clin Microbiol 2010; 48:2793-7; PMID:20573879; https://doi.org/ 10.1128/JCM.02142-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Zhou T, Du L, Lan Y, Sun F, Fan Y, Zhou Y. Development of SYBR green i-based one-step real time RT-PCR assay for quantifying southern rice black-streaked dwarf virus in Rice. J Phytopathol 2014; 162:26-32; https://doi.org/ 10.1111/jph.12152 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Yean Y, Heng C, Chong T, Devi S. Rapid detection, serotyping and quantitation of dengue viruses by TaqMan real-time one-step RT-PCR. 2006; 138:123-30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Cavallari I, Rende F, Ciminale V. Quantitative analysis of human t-lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) gene expression using nucleo-cytoplasmic fractionation and splice junction-specific real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) In: Human Retroviruses. Springer; 2014. page 325-37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Xiao J, Hu Z-G, Liu J, Li M, Zou Y-H. Detection of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide using a time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay. J Immunoass Immunochem 2013; 35(3):221–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Chen L, Sheng Z, Zhang A, Guo X, Li J, Han H, Jin M. Quantum-dots-based fluoroimmunoassay for the rapid and sensitive detection of avian influenza virus subtype H5N1. Luminescence 2010; 25:419-23; PMID:19844980; https://doi.org/ 10.1002/bio.1167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Meekelenkamp JCE, Schneeberger PM, Wever PC, Leenders A. Comparison of ELISA and indirect immunofluorescent antibody assay detecting Coxiella burnetii IgM phase II for the diagnosis of acute Q fever. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2012; 31:1267-70; PMID:21997772; https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10096-011-1438-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Revoltella RP, Laricchia Robbio L, Liedberg B. Comparison of conventional immunoassays (RIA, ELISA) with surface plasmon resonance for pesticide detection and monitoring. Biotherapy 1998; 11:135-45; PMID:9677045; https://doi.org/ 10.1023/A:1007930112221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Guidi A, Laricchia-Robbio L, Gianfaldoni D, Revoltella R, Del Bono G. Comparison of a conventional immunoassay (ELISA) with a surface plasmon resonance-based biosensor for IGF-1 detection in cows' milk. Biosens Bioelectron 2001; 16:971-7; PMID:11679277; https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0956-5663(01)00245-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Jahanshahi P, Ghomeishi M, Rafiq F, Adikan M. Study on Dielectric Function Models for Surface Plasmon Resonance Structure. Sci World J 2014; 2014:503749; https://doi.org/ 10.1155/2014/503749 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Jahanshahi P, Dermosesian E, Adikan FRM, Yong S. Numerical and analytical investigation of a SPR structure as Biosensor [Internet] In: Frontiers in Optics 2014. Optical Society of America; 2014. page FTh1E.1. [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Jahanshahi P, Shakibaei BH, Gang SY, Adikan FRM. Numerical analysis of SPR-based optical fiber biosensor. In: Photonics (ICP), 2014 IEEE 5th International Conference on. 2014 page 182-4. [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Jahanshahi P, Zalnezhad E, Sekaran SD, Adikan FRM. Rapid Immunoglobulin M-Based Dengue Diagnostic Test Using Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensor. Sci Rep [Internet] 2014; 4:1-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Podjarny A, Dejaegere AP, Kieffer B. Biophysical approaches determining ligand binding to biomolecular targets: detection, measurement and modelling. 22(2011): Royal Society of Chemistry. [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Yu H, Kim K, Ma K, Lee W, Choi J-W, Yun C-O, Kim D. Enhanced detection of virus particles by nanoisland-based localized surface plasmon resonance. Biosens Bioelectron 2012; 41:249–255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Lee J-H, Kim B-C, Oh B-K, Choi J-W. Highly sensitive localized surface plasmon resonance immunosensor for label-free detection of HIV-1. Nanomedicine Nanotechnology, Biol Med 2013; 9(7):1018–1026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Rich RL, Myszka DG. Survey of the 2009 commercial optical biosensor literature. J Mol Recognit 2011; 24:892-914; PMID:22038797; https://doi.org/ 10.1002/jmr.1138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Zheng R, Park B-W, Kim D-S, Cameron BD. Development of a highly specific amine-terminated aptamer functionalized surface plasmon resonance biosensor for blood protein detection. Biomed Opt Express 2011; 2:2731-40; PMID:21991560; https://doi.org/ 10.1364/BOE.2.002731 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Okun VM, Moser R, Blaas D, Kenndler E. Complexes between monoclonal antibodies and receptor fragments with a common cold virus: determination of stoichiometry by capillary electrophoresis. Anal Chem 2001; 73:3900-6; PMID:11534714; https://doi.org/ 10.1021/ac0102213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Lin S, Shih-Yuan Lee A, Lin C-C, Lee C-K. Determination of binding constant and stoichiometry for antibody-antigen interaction with surface plasmon resonance. Curr Proteomics 2006; 3:271-82; https://doi.org/ 10.2174/157016406780655586 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Berzofsky JA, Berkower IJ, Epstein SL. Antigen-antibody interactions and monoclonal antibodies Fundam Immunol 3rd ed New York: Raven; 1993; 421-65. [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Wilson IA, Stanfield RL. Antibody-antigen interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1993; 3:113-8; https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0959-440X(93)90210-C [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Lin L-P, Huang L-S, Lin C-W, Lee C-K, Chen J-L, Hsu S-M, Lin S. Determination of binding constant of DNA-binding drug to target DNA by surface plasmon resonance biosensor technology. Curr Drug Targets-Immune, Endocr Metab Disord 2005; 5:61-72; https://doi.org/ 10.2174/1568008053174697 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Yuan B, Zhuang X, Hao Y, Tan Z. Kinetics of base stacking-aided DNAhybridization. Chem Commun 2008; 48:6600–6602; https://doi.org/ 10.1039/b812929k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Citartan M, Gopinath SCB, Tominaga J, Tang T-H. Label-free methods of reporting biomolecular interactions by optical biosensors. Analyst 2013; 138:3576-92; PMID:23646346; https://doi.org/ 10.1039/c3an36828a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Bizley SC, Williams AC, Khutoryanskiy V V. Thermodynamic and kinetic properties of interpolymer complexes assessed by isothermal titration calorimetry and surface plasmon resonance. Soft Matter 2014; 10:8254-60; PMID:25186562; https://doi.org/ 10.1039/C4SM01138D [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Jahanshahi P, Sekaran SD, Adikan FRM. Optical and analytical investigations on dengue virus rapid diagnostic test for IgM antibody detection. Med Biol Eng Comput 2015; 53:679-87; PMID:25791696; https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11517-015-1262-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].BIACORE. BIAevaluation Version 3 Software Handbook. 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Ordal MA, Long LL, Bell RJ, Bell SE, Bell RR, Alexander RW Jr, Ward CA, others . Optical properties of the metals al, co, cu, au, fe, pb, ni, pd, pt, ag, ti, and w in the infrared and far infrared. Appl Opt 1983; 22:1099-119; PMID:18195926; https://doi.org/ 10.1364/AO.22.001099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Tanious FA, Nguyen B, Wilson WD. Biosensor-surface plasmon resonance methods for quantitative analysis of biomolecular interactions. Methods Cell Biol 2008; 84:53-77; PMID:17964928; https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0091-679X(07)84003-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Healthcare GE. Biacore 3000 Instrument Handbook. 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Peeling RW, Artsob H, Pelegrino JL, Buchy P, Cardosa MJ, Devi S, Enria DA, Farrar J, Gubler DJ, Guzman MG, et al.. Evaluation of diagnostic tests: dengue. Nat Rev Microbiol 2010; 8:S30-7; PMID:21548185; https://doi.org/ 10.1038/nrmicro2459 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].World Health Organization (WHO), others . Comprehensive guidelines for prevention and control of dengue and dengue haemorrhagic fever. WHO Reg Publ SEARO 2011. WHO, Regional Office for Southeast Asia. [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Rathakrishnan A, Sekaran SD. New development in the diagnosis of dengue infections. Expert Opin Med Diagn 2013; 7:99-112; PMID:23530846; https://doi.org/ 10.1517/17530059.2012.718759 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Jindal H, Bhatt B, Malik JS, Shashikantha SK. Dengue vaccine: A valuable asset for the future. Hum Vaccines Immunother 2014; 10:2245-6; https://doi.org/ 10.4161/hv.28953 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bioengineered are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES