ABSTRACT
Genome editing technologies, such as transcription activator-like effector nuclease (TALEN) and the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein (Cas) systems, can induce DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) at the targeted genomic locus, leading to frameshift-mediated gene disruption in the process of DSB repair. Recently, the technology-induced DSBs followed by DSB repairs are applied to integrate exogenous genes into the targeted genomic locus in various model organisms. In addition to a conventional knock-in technology mediated by homology-directed repair (HDR), novel knock-in technologies using refined donor vectors have also been developed with the genome editing technologies based on other DSB repair mechanisms, including non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ). Therefore, the improved knock-in technologies would contribute to freely modify the genome of model organisms.
KEYWORDS: genome editing, knock-in, MMEJ, NHEJ, TALEN, CRISPR/Cas9, zebrafish
Insertion of exogenous genes into the genome of model organisms
Sophisticated technologies for genome engineering have been developed during the past few decades, resulting in the improvement of our understanding of developmental and physiologic molecular functions in organogenesis of various model organisms. Insertion of exogenous DNA into the genome of model organisms is a powerful genetic tool in genome engineering with which one can induce the expression of exogenous genes or disrupt the function of endogenous target genes. In fact, the insertion of fluorescent protein genes driven by well-characterized tissue-specific promoters enables us to monitor the expression and behavior of the reporter genes in predictable tissues and organs.1
In the vertebrate model zebrafish (Danio rerio), genome insertion of a donor vector containing a tissue-specific promoter and a fluorescent protein gene has been achieved either by using the I-SceI meganuclease or the Tol2 and Sleeping Beauty transposon systems.2,3 These methods allow efficient integration of exogenous genes into the genome that can be judged by the expression of the reporter gene in the progeny and have been used to generate transgenic zebrafish lines. Unpredictable ectopic expression of the reporter gene is often observed in these transgenic lines,4 presumably due to the transcriptional influence around the insertion site. Because the donor vector usually does not contain the entire enhancer/promoter region of the target gene, the expression of the reporter in these lines partially overlaps the expression of the endogenous target gene. Recent innovation of the genome editing technologies, including transcription activator-like effector nuclease (TALEN) and the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated proteins (Cas), enables us to perform the targeted integration (knock-in) of the reporter gene in addition to the targeted gene disruption (knockout), presenting valuable applications in genome engineering.5 In this review, we briefly overview methods for gene insertions that have been used in zebrafish and intensively introduce recent improved knock-in technologies using the CRISPR/Cas9 system.
Insertion of exogenous genes using the meganuclease and transposon systems
The I-SceI meganuclease has been used as a tool for integration of a reporter into the genome of model organisms.2,6 The donor vector containing a reporter gene driven by a tissue-specific promoter plus a fluorescent protein gene flanked by the recognition site of I-SceI is co-injected with the meganuclease into the embryos.2,6 The I-SceI meganuclease, which recognizes the long recognition motif, rarely cuts the genome, leading to the reduction of the mosaicism of reporter expression (Fig. 1A). It has been reported that co-injection of the donor vector and I-SceI increased the incidence of the construct insertion into the genome.2 It is still not clear how the linearized construct can be integrated into the genome.
Figure 1.

I-SceI- and Tol2-mediated insertion of exogenous genes. (A) I-SceI-mediated insertion of an exogenous gene. I-SceI recognition sites (orange rectangle: 5′-TAGGGATAACAGGGTAAT-3′) in the donor vectors (light blue lines) can be cleaved by the I-SceI meganuclease. Co-injection of the donor vectors and I-SceI increases the incidence of the integration of the promoter (pink box) and the reporter (green box) constructs into the genome. (B) Tol2-mediated insertion of an exogenous gene. The reporter construct flanked by the Tol2 inverted terminal repeat (Tol2 ITR, yellow boxes) sites is excised by Tol2 transposase, leading to the integration of the construct containing the promoter (pink box) and the reporter (green box) into the genome.
Transposon systems have improved the integration efficiency of the reporter gene compared with the I-SceI meganuclease-mediated insertion.2 Two transposable elements, Tol2 and Sleeping Beauty, were found in fish and have been applied to generate transgenic zebrafish lines.7-10 The transposon vector containing Tol2 transposable elements, a tissue-specific promoter, and a reporter gene is co-injected with Tol2 transposases into the embryos, often resulting in the insertion of the reporter into the genome (Fig. 1B). Because both the integration frequency and germline transmission rate are relatively high compared with those of the meganuclease method, the transposon-mediated insertion methods have been widely used to generate transgenic zebrafish lines. Unpredictable insertion events of these methods often cause different expression profiles of the reporter compared with those of individual endogenous genes because the expression of the inserted reporter gene could be influenced by the transcriptional regulatory region around the insertion site (e.g., enhancers and repressors). Thus, the targeted knock-in technology of the reporter construct is desired in genome engineering.
Genome editing technologies and DNA repair mechanisms
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) induced by genome editing technologies at the targeted locus enable us to disrupt the function of the gene of interest. TALEN technology utilizes a chimeric molecule consisting of the transcription activator-like effector (TALE) and the FokI nuclease catalytic domains11,12 (Fig. 2A). The TALE domain, which was originally found in the plant pathogenic bacteria Xanthomonas, binds to the targeted genomic sequences through its approximately 34-amino acid DNA recognition motifs, each of which possesses repeat variable diresidues (RVD) essential for individual nucleotide recognition. The FokI nuclease domain functions as a dimer; therefore, using the forward and reverse TALENs at the targeted locus, DSBs can be generated by the dimerized FokI catalytic domains at the spacer region between the TALEN recognition sites.
Figure 2.

Genome editing technologies, TALEN and CRISPR/Cas9. (A) The structure of TALEN. TALE domains (blue boxes), which consist of multiple DNA-binding motifs and can be designed to target a specific locus of the genome (dark blue lines), bind to the targeted locus in the forward and reverse directions. FokI nuclease (orange half circles) fused to the TALE domain forms a dimer and cleaves double-strand DNA. The red arrowheads indicate the cleavage sites. (B) The structure of CRISPR/Cas9. CRISPR/Cas9 consists of the Cas9 nuclease (pink) and an sgRNA (red lines). The sgRNA possesses 20 bp sequences that are complementary to a target site (lime green bars) and is followed by the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) site (yellow lines) required for the recognition of Cas9. The sgRNA/Cas9 complex binds to the target site though the sgRNA sequences and cleaves it by the Cas9 nuclease activity. The red arrowheads indicate the cleavage sites. The left-hand side of the top strand of the genome (dark blue line) has 3' polarity.
The CRISPR/Cas9 complex composed of CRISPR RNA (crRNA), trans-activating CRISPR RNA (tracrRNA), and Cas9 nuclease recognizes the targeted genomic sequences and induces DSBs at the targeted locus (Fig. 2B).13,14 The spacer domain (20 nucleotides) of the crRNA:tracrRNA duplex specifically associates with the complementary DNA sequences followed by the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM). The crRNA:tracrRNA duplex has recently been modified into a single guide RNA (sgRNA) that can be functional with Cas9, making it easier to perform the genome editing.
DSBs induced by the TALEN or CRISPR/Cas9 system can be repaired by at least 3 DSB repair mechanisms: (1) homology-directed repair (HDR), (2) non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), and (3) microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) (Fig. 3). HDR-mediated DSB repair is a precise repair pathway, as it uses a sister chromatid or a donor vector that has long homologous sequences (> 400 bp) complementary to the targeted genomic sequences as a template.15 NHEJ-mediated DSB repair directly connects the ends of broken strands. In the process of NHEJ, various insertion and/or deletion (indel) mutations can be introduced at the target site, resulting in the frameshift-mediated gene disruption.16 When microhomology sequences (3–30 bp) exist near the target site, the microhomology sequences exposed near the DSBs site anneal with each other and delete excess DNA in the process of the MMEJ-mediated DSB repair, often leading to the predictable deletion mutations at the target site.17
Figure 3.

DSB repair mechanisms following the genome editing technology-mediated DSB. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) induced by genome editing technologies are repaired by (1) homology-directed repair (HDR) (2), non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), and (3) microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ). HDR repair requires long double-strand DNA fragments that possess homologous sequences to the targeted genomic locus (red lines) and replaces the cleaved DNA (dark blue lines) with the newly synthesized DNA (green lines). NHEJ repair, which involves several molecules including Ku70/80 proteins and DNA ligase IV (green, light green and orange circles), connects the ends of the broken strands, often resulting in various insertion and/or deletion (indel) mutations. In MMEJ repair, the microhomology sequences (yellow and pink boxes) exposed at the target site are annealed to each other and filled by DNA polymerase, often leading to predictable small deletions.
DNA repairs following the CRISPR-mediated DSBs in the targeted locus and in the donor vector are critical for the efficient targeted knock-in of the reporter genes. In fact, the HDR-mediated knock-in of a reporter has been improved by adding the recognition motifs cleaved by genome editing technologies in the donor vector containing long homologous sequences to the targeted locus.18 Simultaneous cleavages of the endogenous target site and the donor vector by sgRNAs/Cas9 increase the efficiency of the HDR-mediated integration of the reporter gene.19 It has recently been shown that the donor vector lacking homologous sequences, but possessing the CRISPR target site, can be integrated by NHEJ-mediated DNA repair at the DSBs induced by CRISPR/Cas9.20,21 By using the donor vector containing microhomology sequences (20–40 bp) homologous to the targeted genomic sequences, we and others have recently reported that MMEJ could efficiently induce the targeted integration of exogenous genes into the genome.22-24 Thus, both NHEJ- and MMEJ-mediated knock-in technologies are functional during zebrafish embryogenesis in addition to HDR-mediated knock-in technology.
NHEJ-mediated reporter knock-in to visualize and disrupt the target gene
Two groups have recently reported the NHEJ-mediated integration of a reporter gene at the targeted locus.20,21 Kimura et al. designed a reporter construct containing the target site for sgRNA/Cas9, the heat shock protein (hsp) 70 promoter, and the GAL4 gene. By using the reporter integration upstream of the transcription start site, they tried to visualize the expression of the evx2 gene, which is expressed in specific subsets of neurons in the central nervous system (CNS) during zebrafish embryogenesis.25 After the GAL4 reporter construct, sgRNAs targeting for the evx2 gene promoter, and Cas9 mRNA were injected into Tg[UAS:RFP] transgenic zebrafish embryos, they established a transgenic line expressing RFP in CNS. Because both reporter expression and Evx2 protein expression visualized by anti-Evx2 antibody were almost overlapped, the reporter integrated in the promoter region would receive the enhancer and repressor activity in the evx2 locus. Thus, the targeted integration of the reporter into the promoter is a very useful genetic tool to visualize the expression of target genes during embryogenesis.
We anticipated that if insertion of the reporter gene into the start codon of a target gene suppresses the expression of a functional protein, the loss-of-function phenotypes of the target gene should be observed in the homozygous embryos. To test this possibility, we tried to integrate the reporter construct into the start codon region of the paired box 2a (pax2a) gene because pax2a is expressed in the midbrain-hindbrain boundary (MHB), and its disruption causes the loss of the MHB.26,27 The donor vector possessed the hsp70 promoter and eGFP gene (Mbait-hs-eGFP) that were flanked by sgRNA-target sites (Fig 4A). When the donor vector was co-injected with Cas9 mRNA and 2 sgRNAs (targeting for the pax2a locus and for the donor vector) into zebrafish embryos, the eGFP expression in some of the injected F0 embryos partially overlapped with the pax2a expression domains.28 We established the transgenic line Tg[pax2a-hs:eGFP], showing that the eGFP expression in the heterozygous embryos completely overlaps the endogenous pax2a expression domains28 (Fig. 4B (i)). We found that all the homozygous embryos exhibited the loss of the MHB identical to the noi/pax2a mutant (Fig. 4B (ii)), while all the heterozygous embryos exhibited normal MHB. We have also reported that the NHEJ-mediated integration of the reporter gene into the start codon is useful to monitor the expression pattern of an uncharacterized gene (epdr1: ependymin related 1) in the heterozygous embryos and to analyze the loss-of-function phenotypes in the homozygous embryos.28
Figure 4.

NHEJ-mediated integration of a reporter gene at the targeted genomic locus. (A) A schematic of NHEJ-mediated integration steps of a reporter gene into the start codon region of the pax2a gene. Two distinct sgRNAs (sgRNA-1 and -2) targeting the pax2a locus (pink box) and the donor vector (red box) containing the hsp70 promoter and eGFP gene were designed. Simultaneous cleavages of the targeted genomic locus and the donor vector by the sgRNAs induce an efficient integration of the reporter gene into the genome. The white and light blue boxes indicate the 5′ untranslated region and the exons of the pax2a gene, respectively. (B) Morphological phenotypes caused by the integration of the reporter gene into the pax2a locus. Upper schematics illustrate the genomic alleles of the pax2a locus. The eGFP expression domains in the heterozygous embryo completely overlap the pax2a expression domains (i, green in middle panel), whereas the homozygous embryo lost the MHB structure (ii, lower panel), which was closely reminiscent of the noi/pax2a mutant embryo.26 The asterisk indicates the MHB. The middle and bottom panels show lateral views of the anterior left and the dorsal view of the embryo at 30 hours post fertilization (hpf), respectively.
Recently, Hoshijima et al. have demonstrated reporter gene insertion just downstream of the start codon of the potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 6a (kcnh6a) gene in zebrafish using TALEN system.29 The kcnh6a gene is exclusively expressed in the heart, and its disruption causes a cardiac disorder.30-32 The authors used a promoter-less donor vector containing the eGFP gene flanked by approximately 1 kb homology arms homologous to the kcnh6a gene and the recognition motifs of I-SceI meganuclease. The donor vector was injected with TALEN mRNA and I-SceI into zebrafish embryos. They found that the eGFP expression in the heterozygous embryos recapitulated the expression of endogenous kcnh6a, while the cardiac deficiencies identical to the kcnh6a null mutant were observed in the homozygous embryos.29
Taken together, these studies suggest that targeted knock-in of the reporter gene around the start codon of a target gene allows the visualization of target gene expression in heterozygous embryos and the appearance of loss-of-function phenotypes in homozygous embryos.
MMEJ-mediated precise integration of the reporter using CRISPR/Cas9
It has recently been shown that DNA polymerase theta (Polq), which is a low-fidelity DNA polymerase required for MMEJ in mammals, is indispensable for the DNA repair mechanism during zebrafish embryogenesis because the maternal-zygotic (MZ) polq mutant (MZpolq) exhibited severely deformed or dead embryos when DSBs were induced by CRISPR/Cas9 or ionizing radiation.24 This result suggests that Polq plays an important role in DSB repairs during zebrafish development. Consistent with this result, when the microhomology sequences existed around the target site, we often obtained the predictable deletion mutants presumably generated in the processes of CRISPR-induced MMEJ.
To take advantage of enough MMEJ activity in zebrafish embryo, we developed a novel knock-in method using a reporter construct containing short homologous sequences (40 bp) around the target site.23 We designed a sgRNA targeting the C-terminus of the keratin type 1 c19e (krtt1c19e) gene, which is highly expressed in basal keratinocytes,33 and another sgRNA targeting the reporter construct that possesses 40 bp homology arms matched to the C-terminal region of the krtt1c19e gene on both ends of the eGFP sequence (Fig. 5A). When the reporter construct was co-injected with the sgRNAs and Cas9 mRNA into zebrafish embryos, eGFP expression in keratinocytes was observed in one-third of the injected embryos at 2 d post fertilization (2dpf) (Fig. 5B). DNA sequence analysis revealed precise knock-in of the reporter at the target site, suggesting that the MMEJ-mediated precise knock-in is functional in zebrafish. We further demonstrated the efficient germline transmission of the knocked-in gene and the expression of Krtt1c19e-eGFP chimeric molecules in keratinocytes of Tg[krtt1c19e:eGFP] embryos, presenting the usefulness of this method to generate precise knock-in lines in zebrafish.23
Figure 5.

MMEJ-mediated integration of a reporter gene at the targeted genomic locus. (A) A schematic of MMEJ-mediated integration steps of a reporter gene into the krtt1c19e locus. Two distinct sgRNAs (sgRNA-3 and -4) targeting the krtt1c19e locus (pink box) and the donor vector (red box) containing the eGFP gene were designed. Microhomology sequences complementary to the C-terminus of the krtt1c19e gene were located adjacent to the sgRNA-target site in the donor vector (yellow boxes with and without hatched lines). These constructs allowed a precise integration of the eGFP gene into the krtt1c19e locus when they were simultaneously cleaved by sgRNAs/Cas9. The white and light blue boxes indicate the untranslated region and the exons of the krtt1c19e gene, respectively. The green arrow indicates the stop codon of the krtt1c19e gene. (B) eGFP expression (green) in the epidermis was observed in the embryos at 2 d post fertilization (2 dpf) injected with sgRNAs/Cas9 mRNA and the donor vector, suggesting that MMEJ is functional in zebrafish embryos (Hisano et al. 2015).
Concluding remarks and future perspective
Genome editing technologies, including TALEN and CRISPR/Cas9, should be powerful genetic tools for basic and applied researches, including medical science. The CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-in of exogenous genes in zebrafish should contribute to the replacement of a zebrafish functional gene with the human counterpart gene containing mutations found in human genetic disorders, leading to the establishment of a disease model organism for human genetic disorders. Such a zebrafish disease model may be useful to analyze the molecular function of the gene responsible for human disease. Furthermore, drug screening to suppress pathological phenotypes in the zebrafish disease model is promising to find effective drugs because it is relatively easy to test the effects of drugs using zebrafish embryos by administering them in the breeding water of the embryos.34 Innovation of knock-in technology as well as genome editing technologies in zebrafish would develop valuable medical applications to overcome human genetic disorders.
Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Funding
This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED, 16km0210077j0001) and the Takeda Science Foundation.
References
- [1].Liu AM, New DC, Lo RK, Wong YH. Reporter gene assays. Methods Mol Biol 2009; 486:109-23; PMID:19347619; https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-1-60327-545-3_8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Thermes V, Grabher C, Ristoratore F, Bourrat F, Choulika A, Wittbrodt J, Joly JS. I-SceI meganuclease mediates highly efficient transgenesis in fish. Mech Dev 2002; 118(1-2):91-8; PMID:12351173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Kawakami K. Transposon tools and methods in zebrafish. Mech Dev 2005; 234(2):244-54; PMID:16110506; https://doi.org/ 10.1002/dvdy.20516 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Picker A, Scholpp S, Böhli H, Takeda H, Brand M. A novel positive transcriptional feedback loop in midbrain-hindbrain boundary development is revealed through analysis of the zebrafish pax2.1 promoter in transgenic lines. Development 2002; 129(13):3227-39. PMID:12070097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Gaj T, Gersbach CA, Barbas CF 3rd. ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol 2013; 31(7):397-405; PMID:23664777; https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.04.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Grabher C, Joly JS, Wittbrodt J. Highly efficient zebrafish transgenesis mediated by the meganuclease I-SceI. Methods Cell Biol 2004; 77:381-401; PMID:15602923 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Koga A, Suzuki M, Inagaki H, Bessho Y, Hori H. Transposable element in fish. Nature 1996; 383(6595):30; PMID:8779712; https://doi.org/ 10.1038/383030a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Ivics Z, Hackett PB, Plasterk RH, Izsvák Z. Molecular reconstruction of Sleeping Beauty, a Tc1-like transposon from fish, and its transposition in human cells. Cell 1997; 91(4):501-10; PMID:9390559 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Kawakami K, Shima A, Kawakami N. Identification of a functional transposase of the Tol2 element, an Ac-like element from the Japanese medaka fish, and its transposition in the zebrafish germ lineage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97(21):11403-8; PMID:11027340; https://doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.97.21.11403 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Davidson AE, Balciunas D, Mohn D, Shaffer J, Hermanson S, Sivasubbu S, Cliff MP, Hackett PB, Ekker SC. Efficient gene delivery and gene expression in zebrafish using the Sleeping Beauty transposon. Dev Biol 2003; 263(2):191-202; PMID:14597195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Boch J, Scholze H, Schornack S, Landgraf A, Hahn S, Kay S, Lahaye T, Nickstadt A, Bonas U. Breaking the code of DNA binding specificity of TAL-type III effectors. Science 2009; 326(5959):1509-12; PMID:19933107; https://doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1178811 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Christian M, Cermak T, Doyle EL, Schmidt C, Zhang F, Hummel A, Bogdanove AJ, Voytas DF. Targeting DNA double-strand breaks with TAL effector nucleases. Genetics 2010; 186(2):757-61; PMID:20660643; https://doi.org/ 10.1534/genetics.110.120717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Garneau JE, MÈ Dupuis, Villion M, Romero DA, Barrangou R, Boyaval P, Fremaux C, Horvath P, Magadán AH, Moineau S. The CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA. Nature 2010; 468(7320):67-71; PMID:21048762; https://doi.org/ 10.1038/nature09523 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 2012; 337(6096):816-21; PMID:22745249; https://doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1225829 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Moynahan ME, Jasin M. Mitotic homologous recombination maintains genomic stability and suppresses tumorigenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010; 11(3):196-207; PMID:20177395; https://doi.org/ 10.1038/nrm2851 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Lieber MR. The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway. Annu Rev Biochem 2010; 79:181-211; PMID:20192759; https://doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev.biochem.052308.093131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].McVey M, Lee SE. MMEJ repair of double-strand breaks (director's cut): deleted sequences and alternative endings. Trends Genet 2008; 24(11):529-38; PMID:18809224; https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.tig.2008.08.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Shin J, Chen J, Solnica-Krezel L. Efficient homologous recombination-mediated genome engineering in zebrafish using TALE nucleases. Development 2014; 141(19):3807-18; PMID:25249466; https://doi.org/ 10.1242/dev.108019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Irion U, Krauss J, Nüsslein-Volhard C. Precise and efficient genome editing in zebrafish using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Development 2014; 141(24):4827-30; PMID:25411213; https://doi.org/ 10.1242/dev.115584 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Auer TO, Duroure K, De Cian A, Concordet JP, Del Bene F. Highly efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-in in zebrafish by homology-independent DNA repair. Genome Res 2014; 24(1):142-53; PMID:24179142; https://doi.org/ 10.1101/gr.161638.113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Kimura Y, Hisano Y, Kawahara A, Higashijima S. Efficient generation of knock-in transgenic zebrafish carrying reporter/driver genes by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome engineering. Sci Rep 2014; 4:6545; PMID:25293390; https://doi.org/ 10.1038/srep06545 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Nakade S, Tsubota T, Sakane Y, Kume S, Sakamoto N, Obara M, Daimon T, Sezutsu H, Yamamoto T, Sakuma T, Suzuki KT. Microhomology-mediated end-joining-dependent integration of donor DNA in cells and animals using TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9. Nat Commun 2014; 5:5560; PMID:25410609; https://doi.org/ 10.1038/ncomms6560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Hisano Y, Sakuma T, Nakade S, Ohga R, Ota S, Okamoto H, Yamamoto T, Kawahara A. Precise in-frame integration of exogenous DNA mediated by CRISPR/Cas9 system in zebrafish. Sci Rep 2015; 5:8841; PMID:25740433; https://doi.org/ 10.1038/srep08841 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Thyme SB, Schier AF. Polq-mediated end joining is essential for surviving DNA double-strand breaks during early zebrafish development. Cell Rep 2016; 15(7):1611-3; PMID:27192698; https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.04.089 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Satou C, Kimura Y, Higashijima S. Generation of multiple classes of V0 neurons in zebrafish spinal cord: progenitor heterogeneity and temporal control of neuronal diversity. J Neurosci 2012; 32(5):1771-83; PMID:22302816; https://doi.org/ 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5500-11.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Brand M, Heisenberg CP, Warga RM, Pelegri F, Karlstrom RO, Beuchle D, Picker A, Jiang YJ, Furutani-Seiki M, van Eeden FJ, et al.. Mutations affecting development of the midline and general body shape during zebrafish embryogenesis. Development 1996; 123:129-42; PMID:9007235 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Lun K, Brand M. A series of no isthmus (noi) alleles of the zebrafish pax2.1 gene reveals multiple signaling events in development of the midbrain-hindbrain boundary. Development 1998; 125(16):3049-62; PMID:9671579 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Ota S, Taimatsu K, Yanagi K, Namiki T, Ohga R, Higashijima SI, Kawahara A. Functional visualization and disruption of targeted genes using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated eGFP reporter integration in zebrafish. Sci Rep 2016; 6:34991; PMID:27725766; https://doi.org/ 10.1038/srep34991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Hoshijima K, Jurynec MJ, Grunwald DJ. Precise editing of the zebrafish genome made simple and efficient. Dev Cell 2016; 36(6):654-67; PMID:27003937; https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.02.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Splawski I, Shen J, Timothy KW, Lehmann MH, Priori S, Robinson JL, Moss AJ, Schwartz PJ, Towbin JA, Vincent GM, et al.. Spectrum of mutations in long-QT syndrome genes. KVLQT1, HERG, SCN5A, KCNE1, and KCNE2. Circulation 2000; 102(10):1178-85; PMID:10973849 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Arnaout R, Ferrer T, Huisken J, Spitzer K, Stainier DY, Tristani-Firouzi M, Chi NC. Zebrafish model for human long QT syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007; 104(27):11316-21; PMID:17592134; https://doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.0702724104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Jao LE, Wente SR, Chen W. Efficient multiplex biallelic zebrafish genome editing using a CRISPR nuclease system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013; 110(34):13904-09; PMID:23918387; https://doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.1308335110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Lee RT, Asharani PV, Carney TJ. Basal keratinocytes contribute to all strata of the adult zebrafish epidermis. PLoS One 2014; 9(1):e84858; PMID:24400120; https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0084858 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Zon LI, Peterson RT. In vivo drug discovery in the zebrafish. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2005; 4(1):35-44; PMID:15688071; https://doi.org/ 10.1038/nrd1606 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
