Abstract
This study describes the in vivo activity of Lactobacillus johnsonii La1 (NCC533) in Giardia intestinalis-infected gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus). Daily administration of lactobacilli in the drinking water from 7 days before inoculation with Giardia trophozoites efficiently prevented G. intestinalis strain WB clone C6 from infecting gerbils. More specifically, shedding of fecal Giardia antigens (GSA65 protein) was diminished in the La1-treated group, and resolution of infection was observed by 21 days postinoculation. Histology and analysis of enzymatic markers of microvillus membrane integrity revealed that probiotic administration also protected against parasite-induced mucosal damage. In addition, a cellular response to Giardia antigens was stimulated in spleen cells from La1-treated gerbils. Results show for the first time the antigiardial effect of probiotic lactobacilli in vivo and provide further insight into the antagonistic properties of lactic acid bacteria against protozoa involved in intestinal infections.
Giardia intestinalis, a flagellated protozoan, is the etiological agent of giardiasis, an intestinal infection which causes diarrhea and malabsorption in humans and animals (19, 22). This parasite has a biphasic developmental cycle with two morphologically different forms: cysts and trophozoites. The latter is the vegetative form of the parasite which is responsible for infection and pathological manifestations (19). Infection follows the ingestion of cysts which then give rise to trophozoites after passage through the stomach and the upper intestinal tract.
Giardia is generally treated with antibiotics (e.g., nitroimidazoles and nitrofurans). However, clinical failures, occurrence of resistant strains, and side effects of anti-Giardia drugs (21, 26, 30, 44) have encouraged research on alternative therapeutic strategies which have included the use of plant extracts and products derived from bees (12, 21, 25). However, since probiotic microorganisms provide health benefits to the host by antagonizing pathogens and modulating both innate and acquired immunity at local and systemic levels (13, 23, 24, 33, 40), we wondered if such organisms could also be used in the treatment of parasitic infections. Certainly, colonization of the intestine by Giardia strongly depends on the intestinal microflora (43). Furthermore, in vitro studies show that some probiotic lactobacilli (e.g., Lactobacillus johnsonii La1) are able to interfere with the cell cycle of G. intestinalis (36). However, since this antigiardial effect does not seem to be a general property of lactobacilli, further research is required to select probiotic strains which can be used in the prevention and treatment of such an infection. For this reason, we used an in vivo model of giardiasis (Meriones unguiculatus) to gain further insight into the antigiardial properties of L. johnsonii La1 (NCC533; Nestec Culture Collection). The protocol was approved by the Nestlé Research Center and state ethical committees.
Frozen suspensions of L. johnsonii (hereafter La1) were thawed and reactivated in MRS broth before the study. The bacteria were then subcultured in MRS broth for 16 h at 37°C and harvested by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 10 min. Concentrated suspensions were frozen at −80°C with 10% (vol/vol) glycerol until required. After thawing, bacterial counts were determined by plating serial dilutions on MRS agar.
Trophozoites of clone C6 of the strain WB of G. intestinalis, kindly provided by Hugo Luján, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina, were grown in Keister's modified TYI-S-33 medium (28) as previously described (36) and then frozen in liquid nitrogen until required.
Suspensions of La1 were prepared daily by diluting thawed concentrated suspensions in mineral water. Young adult Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus) ingested bacterial suspensions ad libitum in their drinking water each day beginning 7 days prior to inoculation with Giardia trophozoites. Based on the daily water intake and the bacterial concentration in drinking water, the daily bacterial intake was estimated to be 108 CFU per animal. Control animals received mineral water instead of the bacterial suspensions throughout the course of the study. Seven days after probiotic treatment had begun, frozen trophozoites were thawed in a water bath at 37°C, and a volume of 200 μl (5 × 105 trophozoites) was administered by gavage to each animal in the two treatment groups. At various time points thereafter, animals were killed by cervical dislocation, and the duodenal contents were analyzed for the presence of trophozoites. To this end, 5-cm-long segments of the small intestine were excised at a distance of 11 cm from the pylorus. These samples were then placed in 2 ml of ice-cold culture medium, opened longitudinally, and vortexed. Enumeration of trophozoites was done by using a hemocytometer with a detection limit of 800 trophozoites/cm.
In order to determine fecal giardial antigens, five fecal pellets (0.27 [±0.05] g [wet weight]) per gerbil were homogenized in 0.5 ml of extraction buffer (50 mM EDTA, 100 μg of soybean trypsin inhibitor [Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.]/ml in phosphate-buffered saline), vortexed for 2 min, and centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 15 min. Detection of GSA65 antigen in the supernatants (1) was performed by using a ProSpecT kit according to the instructions of the manufacturer (Alexon-Trend). Cyst determination was performed microscopically on samples stored in 10% formaldehyde.
For histological analysis, 1 cm of the small intestine collected 10 cm from the pylorus was fixed in Bouin fixative and dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol. Paraffin-embedded sections of 5 μm were rehydrated and stained with hematoxylin and eosin.
Intestinal sucrase activity was measured in 5-cm-long sections of the small intestine which were collected 5 cm below the pylorus. The intestinal samples were placed in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and flushed with 50 ml of ice-cold distilled water using a syringe. The segments were then opened longitudinally, and the mucosa was collected by scraping with a glass microscope slide. Scrapings were stored at −20°C until analysis. Intestinal disaccharidase activity was determined as previously reported (16). Protein concentrations were determined using the Bradford assay, and the results are expressed as arbitrary units per gram of protein (3).
To determine cell proliferation indices, spleens were placed in 2 ml of complete RPMI 1640 medium (10% fetal calf serum, 1% nonessential amino acids), homogenized through a cell strainer (70 μm; BD Falcon, Bedford, Mass.), and centrifuged at 250 × g for 5 min. The pellets were then rapidly lysed with 1 ml of sterile distilled water and centrifuged at 250 × g for 5 min. Cells were resuspended in complete RPMI 1640 medium at a concentration of 106 cells/ml before testing cell proliferation in the presence of the T-cell mitogen concanavalin A (ConA) at a concentration of 3 μg/ml or the B-cell mitogen pokeweed mitogen (PWM) at a concentration of 1 μg/ml (both from Sigma). Stimulation in the presence of Giardia antigens was also evaluated. These membrane antigens were extracted as reported previously (17) and used at a concentration of 10 μg/ml to stimulate the cells.
Spleen cells (105 cells/well) were incubated with complete RPMI 1640 medium (control) supplemented with either ConA, PWM, or Giardia antigen in a final volume of 200 μl of medium. After incubation at 37°C for 72 h, the cells were pulse labeled with 1.5 μCi of [3H]thymidine (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Dübendorf, Switzerland) for a further 16 h. The cells were then harvested on nitrocellulose filters (Packard Biosciences B.V., Groningen, The Netherlands), and the incorporation of [3H]thymidine was measured by scintillation counting (TopCount; Packard Biosciences B.V.). Stimulation indices (SI) were determined as the severalfold increase in titrated thymidine incorporation in stimulated cells compared to that of nonstimulated cells.
Fisher's two-tailed exact statistical analysis was used to compare infection rates, and the two-tailed t test with equal variances was used to compare mucosal sucrase activity and cell proliferation indices of the two groups (Software InfoStat, 2004; Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Cordoba, Argentina).
As shown in Table 1, there was a peak in the Giardia infection rate 7 days postinoculation. At this time point, 10 of the 12 gerbils (83%) in the placebo group and 3 out of 11 gerbils in the La1-treated group had trophozoites in their small intestine (P = 0.01). By day 14, the infection was resolved in the La1-treated group, but 6 out of 14 gerbils in the placebo group were still infected (Table 1) (P = 0.02). Of these gerbils, three were still infected 21 days after inoculation. Although probiotic treatment reduced the infection rate, it had no significant effect on the intensity of infection (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
Days after infection with Giardia | Placebo-treated gerbils
|
La1-treated gerbils
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|
No. of infected animalsb | Log intensityc | No. of infected animalsb | Log intensityc | |
7 | 10/12 | 4.63 ± 1.14 | 3/11 (P = 0.01) | 3.81 ± 0.88 |
14 | 6/14 | 5.07 ± 0.93 | 0/12 (P = 0.02) | ND |
21 | 3/6 | 4.81 ± 1.68 | 0/6 (P = 0.09) | ND |
Gerbils received either La1 or placebo daily from 7 days before inoculation with the trophozoites of G. intestinalis WB clone C6 (5 × 105 trophozoites per animal). Results are from four independent experiments.
Number of gerbils with detectable parasites in the small intestine/total number of gerbils studied. The statistical significance of the infection rate of La1-treated animals compared to that of controls was calculated using Fisher's exact test. P values are shown in parentheses.
Averages ± standard deviations of the log of parasites per infected gerbil. ND, no parasites were detected (<800 trophozoites/cm).
Fecal shedding of GSA65 antigen followed different kinetics from that of live trophozoites in the small intestine. In the placebo group, the number of GSA65-positive gerbils progressively increased from day 7 to day 21 post-Giardia inoculation (Fig. 1). In contrast, the single gerbil positive for GSA65 antigen in the La1-treated group at day 14 was no longer positive at day 21 postinoculation (Fig. 1).
G. intestinalis infection in gerbils has a profound effect on the structure and function of the intestinal mucosa (Fig. 2). Villus shortening and hypercellularity of the lamina propria due to increased numbers of mononuclear, polymorphonuclear, and eosinophilic cells were observed in control animals. In contrast, no morphological damage of the gut mucosa was observed in La1-treated animals. These findings correlated well with the difference in mucosal sucrase activity observed in the two groups. While the intestines of La1-treated animals maintained an enzymatic activity of approximately 200 arbitrary units/g of protein throughout the study, the intestines of control animals had decreasing enzymatic activity over time (Fig. 3). Differences between the two groups were statistically significant at both 14 and 21 days postinoculation (P < 0.05).
No differences in spleen cell proliferation were observed between the two treatment groups 7 days after inoculation with Giardia trophozoites (data not shown). However, at day 14, splenocytes of La1-treated animals showed a greater response to ConA (placebo group SI, 7.8 ± 2.2; La1-treated group SI, 22.8 ± 11.6 [P = 0.09]), to PWM, and to Giardia antigen (placebo group SI, 1.2 ± 0.2; La1-treated group SI, 3.7 ± 0.8 [P = 0.006]) than those of control animals. At 21 days post-Giardia infection, a significantly greater response to Giardia antigen (placebo group SI, 0.9 ± 0.2; La1-treated group SI, 3.6 ± 0.9 [P = 0.007]) and to the B-cell mitogen PWM (placebo group SI, 2.1 ± 0.6; La1-treated group SI, 3.6 ± 0.6 [P = 0.03]) was observed, but there was no longer a difference in the cellular response to ConA between the two groups (data not shown). Research on the efficacy of probiotic bacteria against intestinal infections has focused primarily on protection against bacterial pathogens. The present in vivo study consolidates recent reports describing the capacity of some lactobacilli of human and canine origin to antagonize Giardia infection which interferes with the growth and cell cycle of G. intestinalis in vitro (36). Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus) are a good animal model for studying Giardia infection with strains of human origin (3, 4, 11). Their susceptibility to giardiasis has been attributed to a deficient antibody response to specific Giardia antigens (34). We have observed that gerbils are readily infected with trophozoites administered by gavage and begin to eliminate cysts in their feces 1 week after inoculation (data not shown). As a consequence of this infection, the animals have reduced disaccharidase activity in their intestinal mucosa.
The presence of viable trophozoites in the small intestine is a recognized marker of Giardia infection (37, 42). We found that administration of L. johnsonii La1 dramatically reduces the proportion of gerbils with active trophozoites in the gut and leads to resolution of infection within 14 days. In contrast, viable trophozoites were consistently observed in the intestines of the placebo group at all the time points studied (Table 1). Furthermore, we have found a time-dependent increase in the proportion of GSA65-positive gerbils in this group (Fig. 1). Since GSA65 antigen is present on both trophozoites and cysts (38), it is important that the increased proportion of GSA65-positive gerbils with time may reflect changes in the numbers of both trophozoites and cysts reaching the distal small intestine. Certainly, differences in the kinetics of both GSA65 shedding and trophozoite load in the small intestine are related to the distribution of trophozoites and cysts along the orad-caudad axis (29).
Progression of Giardia infection in gerbils correlates with a progressive impairment in intestinal sucrase activity (3), which may account for the diminished nutrient absorption and failure to thrive associated with giardiasis (11, 19). However, administration of L. johnsonii La1 protects against the impaired sucrase activity and the histological changes found in infected animals. (Fig. 2). It is noteworthy that cysts were eliminated in only a few of the gerbils in the placebo group (data not shown). This is an important observation because cyst production is the only means by which the parasite is known to spread. This observation is also in agreement with previous studies in vitro which have demonstrated that extracellular factors from La1 arrest G. intestinalis in the G1 phase of the cell cycle (36). According to Bernander et al. (6), only trophozoites in G2 phase progress to the cyst form.
The protective effect of probiotics against intestinal pathogens has been ascribed to many factors including antagonism by extracellular factors (8, 15, 31), interference with pathogen-enterocyte interactions (7, 9), and modulation of the immune response (5, 23, 39). Not only innate defense mechanisms but both acquired humoral and cell-mediated immune responses protect against Giardia infection (2, 18, 20, 27, 28, 42). Here, we suggest that La1 treatment reinforces the immune response against Giardia in inoculated gerbils. More specifically, we show an increased splenocyte response to a T-cell mitogen and to Giardia antigens at 14 days postinfection and an increased response to a B-cell mitogen and to Giardia antigens at 21 days postinfection. Even though selection of trophozoites bearing different variant surface proteins in control and La1-treated groups could not be ruled out (35), our results suggest a priming of the immune system by La1 that leads to clearance of both trophozoites and Giardia antigens from the intestines (Table 1 and Fig. 1). It is possible that this reflects the development of a memory response following probiotic administration.
Although the mechanisms underlying the virulence of G. intestinalis remain poorly understood, both direct interaction with enterocytes and secretion of soluble mediators are thought to contribute to the pathogenesis (14). The immune response of the host and inflammatory status of the intestinal mucosa are also key determinants (41). It is therefore interesting that a lower cellular infiltration was observed in the intestinal villi of La1-treated animals than that of controls (Fig. 2). This result indicates the absence of inflammatory processes in the intestine of La1-treated gerbils.
In the present study, it is unlikely that metabolic products in the bacterial suspensions contribute to the protective effects observed. Although lactic acid is the main product of La1 metabolism, only traces of this organic acid were detected in the bacterial suspensions administered (data not shown). Thus, the antigiardial effect of L. johnsonii La1 in vivo is probably due to the production of inhibitory substances in situ and/or to the modulation of the immune response of the host. Certainly, previously published results have shown that L. johnsonii La1 mediates its anti-Giardia effect through the production of soluble mediators (36) and that it is able to modulate the immune response (10, 32, 39).
To summarize, we report for the first time an in vivo effect of a probiotic lactobacillus against G. intestinalis. Our results provide scientific evidence that the applications of probiotic organisms can be extended to include alternative strategies in the prevention of a widespread parasitic infection.
Acknowledgments
We are indebted to the Agencia de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica for financial support. M.A.H. is a fellow at the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET); G.L.D.A. is a member of the Carrera del Investigador Científico y Tecnológico de la Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (CIC-PBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina; and P.F.P. is a member of the Carrera del Investigador Científico y Tecnológico of the CONICET.
We are also grateful to Hugo Luján for providing strain WB clone C6. We also thank Martine Rouvet for her help in the preparation of photographic images, Samuel Steffen and Lucía Brandy for technical assistance, and Alicia N. Califano for statistical assessment. Revision of the manuscript by Anne Donnet is greatly acknowledged.
Editor: A. D. O'Brien
REFERENCES
- 1.Addis, D. G. 1991. Evaluation of a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for Giardia lamblia antigen in stool. J. Clin. Microbiol. 29:1137-1142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Aley, S. B., M. Zimmerman, M. Hetsko, M. E. Selsted, and F. D. Gillin. 1994. Killing of Giardia lamblia by cryptdins and cationic neutrophil peptides. Infect. Immun. 62:5397-5403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Belosevic, M., G. M. Faubert, and J. D. MacLean. 1989. Disaccharidase activity in the small intestine of gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus) during primary and challenge infections with Giardia lamblia. Gut 30:1213-1219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Belosevic, M., G. M. Faubert, J. D. MacLean, C. Law, and N. A. Croll. 1983. Giardia lamblia infections in Mongolian gerbils: an animal model. J. Infect. Dis. 147:222-226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Benyacoub, J., G. L. Maulden, C. Cavadini, T. Sauthier, R. E. Anderson, E. J. Schiffrin, and T. der Weid. 2003. Supplementation of food with Enterococcus faecium (SF68) stimulates immune functions in young dogs. J. Nutr. 133:1158-1162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bernander, R., J. E. Palm, and S. G. Svard. 2001. Genome ploidy in different stages of the Giardia lamblia life cycle. Cell. Microbiol. 3:55-62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bernet, M. F., D. Brassart, J. R. Neeser, and A. L. Servin. 1994. Lactobacillus acidophilus La1 binds to cultured human intestinal cell lines and inhibits cell attachment and cell invasion by enterovirulent bacteria. Gut 35:483-489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bernet-Camard, M. F., V. Lievin, D. Brassart, J. R. Neeser, A. L. Servin, and S. Hudault. 1997. The human Lactobacillus acidophilus strain La1 secretes a nonbacteriocin antibacterial substance(s) active in vitro and in vivo. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:2747-2753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bibiloni, R., P. F. Pérez, and G. L. De Antoni. 1999. Will a high adhering capacity in a probiotic strain guarantee exclusion of pathogens from intestinal epithelia? Anaerobe 5:519-524. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Blum, S., S. Alvarez, D. Haller, P. Perez, and E. J. Schiffrin. 1999. Intestinal microflora and the interaction with immunocompetent cells. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 76:199-205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Buret, A., J. A. Hardin, M. E. Olson, and D. G. Gall. 1992. Pathophysiology of small intestinal malabsorption in gerbils infected with Giardia lamblia. Gastroenterology 103:506-513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Calzada, F., C. M. Cerda-Garcia-Rojas, M. Meckes, R. Cedillo-Rivera, R. Bye, and R. Mata. 1999. Geranins A and B, new antiprotozoal A-type proanthocyanidins from Geranium niveum. J. Nat. Prod. 62:705-709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cebra, J. J. 1999. Influences of microbiota on intestinal immune system development. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 69:1046S-1051S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chin, A. C., D. A. Teoh, K. G.-E. Scott, J. B. Meddings, W. K. Macnaughton, and A. G. Buret. 2002. Strain-dependent induction of enterocyte apoptosis by Giardia lamblia disrupts epithelial barrier function in a caspase-3-dependent manner. Infect. Immun. 70:3673-3680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Coconnier, M. H., V. Lievin, E. Hemery, and A. L. Servin. 1998. Antagonistic activity against Helicobacter infection in vitro and in vivo by the human Lactobacillus acidophilus strain LB. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:4573-4580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dahlqvist, A. 1968. Assay of intestinal disaccharidases. Anal. Biochem. 22:99-107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dunn, L. A., J. A. Upcroft, E. V. Fowler, B. S. Matthews, and P. Upcroft. 2001. Orally administered Giardia duodenalis extracts enhance an antigen-specific antibody response. Infect. Immun. 69:6503-6510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Eckmann, L., F. Laurent, T. D. Langford, M. L. Hetsko, J. R. Smith, M. F. Kagnoff, and F. D. Gillin. 2000. Nitric oxide production by human intestinal epithelial cells and competition for arginine as potential determinants of host defense against the lumen-dwelling pathogen Giardia lamblia. J. Immunol. 164:1478-1487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Farthing, M. J. G. 1995. Giardia lamblia, p. 1081-1105. In M. J. Blaser, P. D. Smith, J. I. Ravdin, H. B. Greenberg, and R. L. Guerrant (ed.), Infections of the gastrointestinal tract. Raven Press, New York, N.Y.
- 20.Faubert, G. 2000. Immune response to Giardia duodenalis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 13:35-54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gardner, T. B., and D. R. Hill. 2001. Treatment of giardiasis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 14:114-128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gillin, F. D., D. S. Reiner, and J. M. McCaffery. 1996. Cell biology of the primitive eukaryote Giardia lamblia. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 50:679-705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Haller, D., S. Blum, C. Bode, W. P. Hammes, and E. J. Schiffrin. 2000. Activation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells by nonpathogenic bacteria in vitro: evidence of NK cells as primary targets. Infect. Immun. 68:752-759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Isolauri, E., Y. Sutas, P. Kankaanpaa, H. Arvilommi, and S. Salminen. 2001. Probiotics: effects on immunity. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 73:444S-450S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Johns, T., G. M. Faubert, J. O. Kokwaro, R. L. Mahunnah, and E. K. Kimanani. 1995. Anti-giardial activity of gastrointestinal remedies of the Luo of east Africa. J. Ethnopharmacol. 46:17-23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Katelaris, P. H., A. Naeem, and M. J. Farthing. 1994. Activity of metronidazole, azithromycin and three benzimidazoles on Giardia lamblia growth and attachment to a human intestinal cell line. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 8:187-192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kaur, H., H. Samra, S. Ghosh, V. K. Vinayak, and N. K. Ganguly. 1999. Immune effector responses to an excretory-secretory product of Giardia lamblia. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 23:93-105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Keister, D. B. 1983. Axenic culture of Giardia lamblia in TYI-S-33 medium supplemented with bile. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 77:487-488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Langford, T. D., M. P. Housley, M. Boes, J. Chen, M. F. Kagnoff, F. D. Gillin, and L. Eckmann. 2002. Central importance of immunoglobulin A in host defense against Giardia spp. Infect. Immun. 70:11-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lemee, V., I. Zaharia, G. Nevez, M. Rabodonirina, P. Brasseur, J. J. Ballet, and L. Favennec. 2000. Metronidazole and albendazole susceptibility of 11 clinical isolates of Giardia duodenalis from France. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 46:819-821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lievin-Le Moal, V., R. Amsellem, A. L. Servin, and M. H. Coconnier. 2002. Lactobacillus acidophilus (strain LB) from the resident adult human gastrointestinal microflora exerts activity against brush border damage promoted by a diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli in human enterocyte-like cells. Gut 50:803-811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Link-Amster, H., F. Rochat, K. Y. Saudan, O. Mignot, and J. M. Aeschlimann. 1994. Modulation of a specific humoral immune response and changes in intestinal flora mediated through fermented milk intake. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 10:55-63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Miettinen, M., J. Vuopio-Varkila, and K. Varkila. 1996. Production of human tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-6, and interleukin-10 is induced by lactic acid bacteria. Infect. Immun. 64:5403-5405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mohanty, M. C., and B. Ravindran. 2002. Deficiency of antibody responses to T-independent antigens in gerbils—Meriones unguiculatus. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 26:385-391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nash, T. E. 2002. Surface antigen variation in Giardia lamblia. Mol. Microbiol. 45:585-590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Pérez, P. F., J. Minnaard, M. Rouvet, C. Knabenhans, D. Brassart, G. L. De Antoni, and E. J. Schiffrin. 2001. Inhibition of Giardia intestinalis by extracellular factors from lactobacilli: an in vitro study. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:5037-5042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Roberts-Thomson, I. C., D. P. Stevens, A. A. Mahmoud, and K. S. Warren. 1976. Giardiasis in the mouse: an animal model. Gastroenterology 71:57-61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rosoff, J. D., and H. H. Stibbs. 1986. Isolation and identification of a Giardia lamblia-specific stool antigen (GSA 65) useful in coprodiagnosis of giardiasis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 23:905-910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Schiffrin, E. J., D. Brassart, A. L. Servin, F. Rochat, and A. Donnet-Hughes. 1997. Immune modulation of blood leukocytes in humans by lactic acid bacteria: criteria for strain selection. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 66:515S-520S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Schiffrin, E. J., F. Rochat, H. Link-Amster, J. M. Aeschlimann, and A. Donnet-Hughes. 1995. Immunomodulation of human blood cells following the ingestion of lactic acid bacteria. J. Dairy Sci. 78:491-497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Scott, K. G., M. R. Logan, G. M. Klammer, D. A. Teoh, and A. G. Buret. 2000. Jejunal brush border microvillous alterations in Giardia muris-infected mice: role of T lymphocytes and interleukin-6. Infect. Immun. 68:3412-3418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Singer, S. M., and T. E. Nash. 2000. T-cell-dependent control of acute Giardia lamblia infections in mice. Infect. Immun. 68:170-175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Singer, S. M., and T. E. Nash. 2000. The role of normal flora in Giardia lamblia infections in mice. J. Infect. Dis. 181:1510-1512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Upcroft, P., and J. A. Upcroft. 2001. Drug targets and mechanisms of resistance in the anaerobic protozoa. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 14:150-164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]