Table 2. Properties of Uniquorn compared to established methods for identification of CCLs.
Identification Method for NGS CCLs | Physical sample required | Additional experiments required | Locus coverage required | Zygosity-pattern required | Dependent on reference genome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
STR (19) | X | X | - | - | - |
SPIA (6) | X | X | X | X | - |
NGS SNP (4) | - | - | X | X | X |
NGS All Variants (Uniquorn) | - | - | - | - | X |
SPIA and STR require additional verification experiments on the physical CCL sample. Identification of CCLs by matching their SNP-zygosities directly from the NGS-data requires that the loci of the characteristic SNPs were sequenced and not filtered. For SPIA and NGS-SNP, zygosity calls have to be comparable (technology, ploidy, algorithms, etc.). Uniquorn only requires using the same reference genome for variation calling. Note that CCL samples created with a specific reference genome versions can be converted into another version, e.g. by a lift-over software, thereby decreasing the severity of this limitation.