Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: Can J Cardiol. 1996 May;12(5):517–521.

An irreversible A1-selective adenosine agonist preconditions rabbit heart

Guang-Shun Liu 1, Kenneth A Jacobson 1, James M Downey 1
PMCID: PMC5472045  NIHMSID: NIHMS449053  PMID: 8640599

Abstract

This study tested whether an irreversible agonist of the A1 adenosine receptor, in DITC ADAC, can mimic the protective effect of ischemic preconditioning in the rabbit heart. Isolated Krebs buffer-perfused rabbit hearts experienced 30 mins of regional ischemia and 120 mins of reperfusion. Infarct size was measured with tetrazolium staining. In untreated hearts 32±2% of the risk zone infarcted while only 9±2% infarction was seen in hearts that were preconditioned with 5 mins of global ischemia followed by 10 mins of reperfusion (P<0.05 versus control). Exposure to 200 nM of the A1- selective agonist 2-chloro-N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CCPA) for 5 mins followed by 10 mins of washout protected the hearts as well as preconditioning with 13±7% infarction (P<0.05 versus control). Protection from CCPA was completely blocked by 200 nM DPCPX (8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine) with 34±7% infarction (P<0.05 versus CCPA) confirming that protection was via the A1 adenosine receptor. m-DITC ADAC, which irreversibly stimulates the A1 adenosine receptor, also protected the hearts with only 15±4% infarction (P<0.05 versus control). It was concluded that m-DITC ADAC does mimic ischemic preconditioning and that an irreversible agonist might be a novel way to provide an extended window of protection to the heart from a single intracoronary injection.

Keywords: Adenosine A1 receptor, Irreversible A1 agonist, Ischemia, Myocardial infarction, Preconditioning, Rabbit


There is great interest in identifying interventions that could make the heart more resistant to infarction during an ischemic insult. One approach that has received much attention in recent years is ischemic preconditioning. First described by Murry and colleagues (1), it was shown that exposing the heart to brief periods of ischemia caused minimal injury but, paradoxically, this caused the heart to become very resistant to infarction from a subsequent ischemic insult. It was later shown by Liu et al (2) that adenosine released by the heart during the preconditioning ischemia triggers the effect, because the protection from ischemic preconditioning could be blocked with nonselective adenosine receptor blockers. It was presumed that the A1 adenosine receptor (A1AR) was responsible because a 5 min intracoronary infusion of the A1-selective agonist R(−)N6 -(2-phenylisopropyl) adenosine was as effective as either adenosine or 5 mins of preconditioning ischemia in protecting the heart. Agonists of the A1AR have also been shown to mimic preconditioning in dog (3), in pig (46) and in human (7) myocardium. More recent studies suggest that the A3 adenosine receptor (A3AR) may also be participating in this response (8,9), and the separate contribution of the AlAR versus the A3AR remains to be clarified.

While the protection conferred by ischemic preconditioning is profound, it is also short lived. Various investigators have found that the protection from ischemic preconditioning wanes within 1 h or less (1012). Furthermore, Yao and Gross (13) report that pharmacological preconditioning with adenosine wanes even faster than that from ischemia. One way to circumvent this problem might be the use of an irreversible agonist for the AlAR. Such a compound, m-DITC-ADAC (N6-[4-[[[4-[[[[2-[[[(3-isothio-cyanatophenyl)amino]thiocarbonyl]-amino]ethyl]amino] carbonyl]methyl]anilino]carbonyl]methyl]phenyl]adenosine), has now been synthesized (14) and was recently characterized in guinea pig heart (15). In the present study we tested its potency in a rabbit heart model of myocardial infarction. To evaluate the potency of m-DITC-ADAC we compared the protection conferred by m-DITC-ADAC with that from both ischemic preconditioning and transient exposure to the A1AR-selective agonist 2-chloro-N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CCPA).

ANIMALS AND METHODS

New Zealand white rabbits of either sex, weighing 1.86 to 2.46 kg, were anesthetized with intravenous sodium pentobarbital (30 mg/kg). All animals received humane care in compliance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, prepared by the United States National Academy of Sciences and published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised 1985). The protocols were reviewed and approved by the authors’ institute’s committee for the ethical use of animals. The neck was opened, and a tracheotomy was performed. The rabbits were ventilated with 100% oxygen via a positive pressure respirator (MD Industries, Alabama). Ventilation rate was 30 to 35 breaths/min, and tidal volume was approximately 15 mL. A left thoracotomy was performed in the fourth intercostal space and the pericardium was opened to expose the heart. A 2-0 silk suture on an RB taper needle was passed around a branch of the left coronary artery, and the ends of the suture were threaded through a small vinyl tube to form a snare. The hearts were quickly excised and mounted on a Langendorff apparatus and perfused under 75 mmHg pressure with Krebs buffer containing (in mM) 118.5 sodium chloride, 24.3 sodium bicarbonate, 4.7 potassium chloride, 1.2 magnesium sulphate, 1.2 potassium dihydrogen phosphate, 2.5 calcium chloride and 10 glucose. The Krebs buffer was gassed with 95% oxygen plus 5% carbon dioxide, which results in a pH of 7.4 to 7.5 and PO2 of 500 to 600 mmHg. The temperature of the perfusate was maintained at 37°C, and the buffer was not recirculated. A fluid-filled latex balloon connected to a pressure transducer via PE240 tubing was inserted into the left ventricle. Balloon volume was adjusted for a systolic pressure of near 100 mmHg. Left ventricular diastolic pressure was not allowed to exceed 15 mmHg. Total coronary artery flow was measured by timed collection of perfusate exiting the heart with a graduated cylinder. Regional ischemia was effected by pulling the snare tight and clamping the tube with a hemostat. Global ischemia was performed by clamping the inflow tubing of the Langendorff apparatus. Reperfusion was achieved by releasing the snare. All hearts were allowed to equilibrate for 20 mins before the experiments were started. Heart rate, left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) and coronary artery flow were recorded just before and at the end of each drug infusion. One minute before the onset of the 30 min period of ischemia, the hearts were paced at 200 beats/min (4 V/4 ms pulses) until the end of the study.

Measurement of infarct and risk area

At the end of each experiment, the silk suture under the coronary branch was tightly tied to reocclude the artery, and a 0.5% suspension of fluorescent particles (1 to 10 μm diameter, Duke Scientific Corp, California) was infused into the perfusate to mark the risk zone as the nonfluorescent tissue. The hearts were then removed from the Langendorff apparatus, weighed and frozen. While still frozen the hearts were cut into 2 mm transverse slices and the slices were incubated in 1% triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) in pH 7.4 buffer for 20 mins at 37°C. NAD-dependent dehydrogenases convert TTC to a formazan pigment and stain tissue that still have the enzymes and cofactor a deep red colour. The infarcted tissue loses those constituents and thus does not stain. After staining, the area of infarcted tissue (TTC-negative tissue) and the risk zone (area lacking fluorescence under ultraviolet light) in each slice was traced onto sheets of clear acetate. The areas of both infarct and risk zone in each slice were determined by planimetry. The volumes of infarcted myocardium and myocardium at risk were then calculated by summing the planimetered areas of each and multiplying by the slice thickness. Because the extent of infarction is underestimated when risk zone size is small in rabbit hearts (16,17), data were excluded if the risk zone was found to be less than 0.4 cm3.

Chemicals

CCPA and DPCPX (8-cyclopentyl-l,3-dipropylxanthine) were purchased from Research Biochemicals International (Massachusetts). m-DITC-ADAC was synthesized as described (14). Compounds were dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 5 mM, except for m-DITC-ADAC, which was 1 mM. The stock solutions were diluted in Krebs buffer to their final concentration. Stock solutions were stored at 0°C for up to three days except for m-DITC-ADAC, which was stored at −20°C for no more than two weeks.

Experiment protocols

The animals were divided into five groups. The hearts in all groups were subjected to a 30 min coronary branch occlusion followed by 120 mins of reperfusion. The control group (n=8) experienced only the 30 mins of regional ischemia, while the preconditioning group (n= 10) received 5 mins of global ischemia plus 10 mins of reperfusion before the 30 min occlusion. In the CCPA group (n=6) the hearts were exposed to 200 nM CCPA for 5 mins followed by a 10 min washout as a substitute for ischemic preconditioning. In the DPCPX and DPCPX/CCPA group (n=6), 200 nM DPCPX was included in the perfusate for 15 mins starting 20 mins before ischemia. Thus, in the DPCPX/CCPA group the DPCPX was present in the perfusate starting 5 mins before and continued 5 mins after exposure to CCPA. The hearts in the m-DITC-ADAC group (n=5) were perfused with buffer containing 1 μΜ m-DITC-ADAC for 15 mins followed by 10 mins of drug-free perfusion before the 30 min ischemic period was started. Data were obtained from 35 rabbits. All hearts used in the study were perfused with buffer within 1 min after excision.

Statistics

All results are expressed as group mean ± SEM. The differences among groups were determined by a one-way ANOVA with a Newman-Keuls post-hoc test. P<0.05 was considered to be significant. A paired t test was used to test for a drug effect on hemodynamic parameters.

RESULTS

Hemodynamic data

Hemodynamic data for all the groups are summarized in Table 1. Heart rate, LVDP and coronary artery flow from all groups were equivalent before treatment except for a significantly lower heart rate in the CCPA group and a higher coronary flow in the DPCPX/CCPA group. Heart rate was significantly decreased (P<0.01) by 200 nM CCPA, a highly selective A1AR agonist, and this effect was completely reversed after 10 mins of drug-free perfusion. The effect of CCPA on heart rate was completely abolished when it was accompanied with 200 nM DPCPX, a highly selective A1AR antagonist that is not thought to affect A3AR at this concentration (18).

TABLE 1.

Hemodynamic data from isolated rabbit hearts

Pre-ischemia Treatment Washout 30 min reperfusion
Group HR CAP DP HR CAF DP HR CAF DP HR CAF DP
Control 206±7 7.0±0.3 108±5 208±5 5.4±0.3 92±6
PC 203±3 7.4±0.3   99±4 205±3 4.7±0.5   64±6 203±2 5.5±0.3 74±4
CCPA 176±1 7.4±0.3 113±8   123±4* 7.1±0.7 102±9 189±7 7.3±0.5 107±7 200±0 3.9±0.9 59±8
DP-CC 208±7 9.3±0.5 121±7 201±7 7.4±0.6 115±7 196±8 7.4±0.6 121±7 200±4 5.0±0.4 60±6
m-DITC-ADAC 189±8 7.9±0.4   93±7 161±7 7.9±0.4     85±13   143±7* 7.4±0.2   99±9 200±0 7.1±0.8 64±8

CAF Coronary artery flow (mL/min/g); CCPA 2-chloro-N6-cyclopentyladenosine; DP Developed pressure (mmHg); DP-CC DPCPX (8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine) + CCPA; HR Heart rate (beats/min); PC Preconditioned.

*

P<0.05 versus pre-ischemia value

Exposure to the irreversible A1AR agonist m-DITC-ADAC (1 μΜ for 15 mins) caused a progressive slowing of the heart rate, which did not reach significance (P=0.057) at the end of the 5 min infusion but was significant 10 mins later (P<0.02). Heart rate remained depressed in these hearts throughout the experiment indicating that the effect was indeed irreversible. None of the treatments significantly altered LVDP or coronary flow at the doses used.

Infarct size

Infarct size data are shown in Table 2. There were no significant differences in the area at risk between the groups. Infarct size was normalized by expressing it as a percentage of the area at risk (the field of the occluded artery). Thirty minutes of coronary branch occusion caused 32±2% of the risk zone to be infarcted in control hearts while only 9±2% infarction was seen in the hearts that were preconditioned with 5 mins global ischemia followed by 10 mins reperfusion (P<0.05 versus control). Exposure to 200 nM CCPA for 5 mins protected the hearts as well as ischemic preconditioning with only 13±7% infarction of the risk zone (P<0.05 versus control). As expected, protection conferred by CCPA was completely blocked by 200 nM DPCPX (34±7% infarction, P<0.05 versus CCPA). m-DITC-ADAC, which irreversibly stimulates the A1AR, also protected the hearts with only 15±4% infarction (P<0.05 versus control) (Figure 1). When pacing was discontinued at the end of the study, hearts treated with m-DITC-ADAC were profoundly bradycardic with a mean rate of 123±9 beats/min. Whether DPCPX or DMSO alone can alter infarct size was not tested in these experiments; both of those tests were conducted in an earlier study from the authors’ laboratory, and no effect was found (8).

TABLE 2.

Infarct size data from isolated rabbit hearts

Group infarct size
(cm3)
Risk size
(cm3)
Infarction
(%)
Control (n= 8) 0.26±0.02 0.81±0.06 32±2  
PC (n=10) 0.07±0.02 0.81±0.08   9±2*
CCPA (n=6) 0.10±0.05 0.69±0.08 13±7*
DP-CC (n=6) 0.25±0.06 0.69±0.06 34±7
DITC-ADAC (n=5) 0.13±0.03 0.87±0.04 15±4*
*

P<0.05 versus control;

P<0.05 versus CCPA (2-chloro-N6-cyclopentyladen- osine). DP-CC DPCPX (8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine) + CCPA; PC Preconditioned

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Plot showing percentage infarction of the risk region for all of the hearts in the study. Open circles depict individual hearts; closed circles represent group means ± SEM. CCPA 2-chloro-N6 -cyclopentyladenosine; CONT Control;· DPCPX 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine; PC Preconditioned.

DISCUSSION

The results indicate that CCPA, a highly selective agonist of the A1AR, could completely mimic protection conferred by ischemic preconditioning in the isolated rabbit heart. Because the A1AR-selective antagonist DPCPX could block that protection, it was confirmed that the AlAR was responsible for causing the protection. The irreversible AlAR-selective agonist m-DITC-ADAC was equally protective. We conclude that a single intracoronary treatment with m-DITC-ADAC should be capable of providing an extended window of protection to the heart against infarction.

m-DITC-ADAC is thought to be an irreversible AlAR- selective agonist. Treatment of smooth muscle (DDT1 MF-2) cells in culture or guinea pig isolated hearts with m-DITC-ADAC has been found to elicit a selective, prolonged and irreversible AlAR agonist effect (15). This activation is not reversed by xanthines due to a presumed covalent attachment of the ligand to the receptor. When m-DITC-ADAC was given to produce a level of bradycardia comparable with that achieved with CCPA, a similar degree of protection was obtained. Because by the activation of AlAR m-DITC-ADAC is irreversible, it was not appropriate to test whether DPCPX could block the protection. These results support our hypothesis that A1ARs are present on the heart and that their activation will mimic the preconditioning response.

One of the peculiar properties of ischemic preconditioning is its memory. As was illustrated with CCPA in the present study, the adenosine receptors need only be activated transiently in order to cause the heart to enter a preconditioned state which persists after the agonist has been withdrawn (2). The exact nature of this memory is not known but is thought to be related to an up-regulation of protein kinase C, since inhibitors of this kinase completely reverse the preconditioned state but have no effect on infarction in nonpreconditioned hearts (19). Unfortunately, this memory lasts for only about half an hour (10,11,13) making it difficult to utilize the protection from preconditioning clinically.

Chronic intravenous infusion of CCPA extended the window of protection to at least 6 h (20), but was accompanied by unacceptable side effects including bradycardia and hypotension. Furthermore, by 72 h the protection from a continuous infusion of CCPA was lost due to tolerance (20), and follow-up studies revealed that the site of this tolerance was the adenosine receptor itself (unpublished data). Because of limitations with the isolated heart model we were unable to test how long the protection from a single dose of m-DITC-ADAC will last, but in the present study heart rate remained bradycardic for at least 3 h following a single dose of m-DITC-ADAC and showed no sign of recovery. It is not known how rapidly AlARs turn over in the heart, but it is possible that a single intracoronary infusion of m-DITC-ADAC could provide several days of protection with few peripheral side effects. In certain high risk patients such treatment could be of value. On the other hand the sensation of angina has been proposed to be mediated by adenosine receptors in the heart (21), and it is possible that intracoronary m-DITC-ADAC could result in intractable anginalike pain.

We (8) and others (9) have recently proposed that the A3AR also may participate in ischemic preconditioning. That theory was based on the observation that 200 nM DPCPX could not block protection from ischemic preconditioning or from adenosine while the nonselective adenosine antagonist 8-p-sulphophenyl theophylline blocked the protection. An important property of DPCPX is that it is a poor ligand of A3AR with a reported Ki of 50 μΜ (22). The highly Α1-selective agonist CCPA also has very poor affinity for the A3AR (23). The Ki values for inhibition of radioligand binding at rat adenosine receptors for CCPA are 0.6 nM for A1AR and 237 nM for A3AR. Protection from 200 nM CCPA was completely blocked by 200 nM DPCPX. The fact that bradycardia, an A1AR effect (24), was also blocked further confirms that the AlARs were completely blocked. In light of the above it seems likely that CCPA was able to protect these hearts exclusively through the A1AR.

If A3AR were activated by CCPA, then DPCPX would not be expected to have blocked the resulting protection. Indeed this concentration of DPCPX will not block protection from either 10 μΜ adenosine, 65 nM N6-[2-(4-amino-phenyl)ethyl]adenosine, a potent mixed A1 and A3 agonist or ischemic preconditioning itself. If this conclusion is correct then it would provide evidence that A1AR and A3AR, both of which couple to Gi, are present on the rabbit heart and constitute a parallel pathway for preconditioning. m-DITC-ADAC is also not thought to bind to A3AR, since its precursor, the amine congener ADAC, has roughly the same affinity as CCPA at rat A1 and A3 receptors (23).

CONCLUSION

m-DITC-ADAC, a potent irreversible agonist of the adenosine A1AR, was able to mimic fully the protective effects of ischemic preconditioning in the rabbit heart. An irreversible A1AR agonist may be useful for extending the duration of protection and minimizing side effects from pharmacological preconditioning.

Acknowledgments

Supported in part by HL 20648 from the US National Institutes of Health.

References

  • 1.Murry CE, Jennings RB, Reimer KA. Preconditioning with ischemia: a delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium. Circulation. 1986;74:1124–36. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.74.5.1124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Liu GS, Thornton J, Van Winkle DM, Stanley AWH, Olsson RA, Downey JM. Protection against infarction afforded by preconditioning is mediated by A1 adenosine receptors in rabbit heart. Circulation. 1991;84:350–6. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.84.1.350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Auchampach JA, Gross GJ. Adenosine A1 receptors, KATP channels, and ischemic preconditioning in dogs. Am J Physiol. 1993;264:H1327–36. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1993.264.5.H1327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Van Winkle DM, Chien GL, Wolff RA, Soifer BE, Davis RF. Intracoronary infusion of r-phenylisopropyl adenosine prior to ischemia/reperfusion reduces myocardial infarct size in swine. Circulation. 1992;86(Supppl I):I213. (Abst) [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schulz R, Rose J, Post H, Heusch G. Involvement of endogenous adenosine in ischaemic preconditioning in swine. Pflugers Arch Eur J Physiol. 1995;430:273–82. doi: 10.1007/BF00374659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schwarz ER, Mohri M, Sack S, Arras M. The role of adenosine and its A1-receptor in ischemic preconditioning. Circulation. 1991;84(Suppl II):II191. (Abst) [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ikonomidis JS, Tumiatis LC, Mickle DAG, Weisel RD. Preconditioning protects human cardiac myocytes from ischemic injury. Circulation. 1993;88(Suppl):I570. (Abst) [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Liu GS, Richards SC, Olsson RA, Mullane K, Walsh RS, Downey JM. Evidence that the adenosine A3 receptor may mediate the protection afforded by preconditioning in the isolated rabbit heart. Cardiovasc Res. 1994;28:1057–61. doi: 10.1093/cvr/28.7.1057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Armstrong S, Ganote CE. Adenosine receptor specificity in preconditioning of isolated rabbit cardiomyocytes: evidence of A3 receptor involvement. Cardiovasc Res. 1994;28:1049–56. doi: 10.1093/cvr/28.7.1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Van Winkle DM, Thornton JD, Downey DM, Downey JM. The natural history of preconditioning: cardioprotection depends on duration of transient ischemia and time to subsequent ischemia. Coronary Artery Dis. 1991;2:613–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Miura T, Adachi T, Ogawa T, Iwamoto T, Tsuchida A, Ilimura O. Myocardial infarct size-limiting effect of ischemic preconditioning: its natural decay and the effect of repetitive preconditioning. Cardiovasc Pathol. 1992;1:147–54. doi: 10.1016/1054-8807(92)90018-J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Murry CE, Richard VJ, Jennings RB, Reimer KA. Myocardial protection is lost before contractile function recovers from ischemic preconditioning. Am J Physiol. 1991;260:H796–804. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1991.260.3.H796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yao Z, Gross GJ. A comparison of adenosine-induced cardioprotection and ischemic preconditioning in dogs: efficacy, time course, and role of KATP channels. Circulation. 1994;89:1229–36. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.3.1229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jacobson KA, Barone S, Kammula U, Stiles GL. Electrophilic derivatives of purines as irreversible inhibitors of A1 adenosine receptors. J Med Chem. 1989;32:1043–9. doi: 10.1021/jm00125a019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhang J, Belardenelli L, Jacobson KA, Baker SP. Characterization of an irreversible adenosine agonist in DDTI MF-2, PC12 cells and the guinea pig isolated heart. Drug Dev Res. 1994;31:336. (Abst) [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ytrehus K, Downey JM. Experimental models assessing the physiology of myocardial ischemia. Curr Opin Cardiol. 1993;8:581–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Miura T, Ogawa T, Iwamoto T, Shimamoto K, IIimura O. Dipyridamole potentiates the myocardial infarct size-limiting effect of ischemic preconditioning. Circulation. 1992;86:979–85. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.86.3.979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ji X-D, von Lubitz D, Olah M, Stiles GL, Jacobson KA. Species differences in ligand affinity at central A3-adenosine receptors. Drug Dev Res. doi: 10.1002/ddr.430330109. (In press) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Liu Y, Ytrehus K, Downey JM. Evidence that translocation of protein kinase C is a key event during ischemic preconditioning of rabbit myocardium. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1994;26:661–8. doi: 10.1006/jmcc.1994.1078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tsuchida A, Thompson R, Olsson RA, Downey JM. The anti-infarct effect of an adenosine A1-selective agonist is diminished after prolonged infusion as is the cardioprotective effect of ischaemic preconditioning in rabbit heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1994;26:303–11. doi: 10.1006/jmcc.1994.1039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Crea F, Pupita G, Galassi AR, et al. Role of adenosine in pathogenesis of anginal pain. Circulation. 1990;81:164–72. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.81.1.164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Linden J, Taylor HE, Robeva AS, et al. Molecular cloning and functional expression of a sheep A3 adenosine receptor with widespread tissue distribution. Mol Phamacol. 1993;44:524–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.van Galen PJM, van Bergen AH, Gallo-Rodriguez C, et al. A binding site model and structure activity relationships for the rat A3 adenosine receptor. Mol Pharmacol. (In press) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Olsson RA, Pearson JD. Cardiovascular purinoceptors. Physiol Rev. 1990;70:761–845. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1990.70.3.761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES