ABSTRACT
The major oxidative stress response in Streptomyces is controlled by the sigma factor SigR and its cognate antisigma factor RsrA, and SigR activity is tightly controlled through multiple mechanisms at both the transcriptional and posttranslational levels. Here we show that sigR has a highly unusual GTC start codon and that this leads to another level of SigR regulation, in which SigR translation is repressed by translation initiation factor 3 (IF3). Changing the GTC to a canonical start codon causes SigR to be overproduced relative to RsrA, resulting in unregulated and constitutive expression of the SigR regulon. Similarly, introducing IF3* mutations that impair its ability to repress SigR translation has the same effect. Thus, the noncanonical GTC sigR start codon and its repression by IF3 are critical for the correct and proper functioning of the oxidative stress regulatory system. sigR and rsrA are cotranscribed and translationally coupled, and it had therefore been assumed that SigR and RsrA are produced in stoichiometric amounts. Here we show that RsrA can be transcribed and translated independently of SigR, present evidence that RsrA is normally produced in excess of SigR, and describe the factors that determine SigR-RsrA stoichiometry.
KEYWORDS: IF3, noncanonical start codon, oxidative stress, sigma factors, translation initiation
IMPORTANCE
In all sigma factor-antisigma factor regulatory switches, the relative abundance of the two proteins is critical to the proper functioning of the system. Many sigma-antisigma operons are cotranscribed and translationally coupled, leading to a generic assumption that the sigma and antisigma factors are produced in a fixed 1:1 ratio. In the case of sigR-rsrA, we show instead that the antisigma factor is produced in excess over the sigma factor, providing a buffer to prevent spurious release of sigma activity. This excess arises in part because sigR has an extremely rare noncanonical GTC start codon, and as a result, SigR translation initiation is repressed by IF3. This finding highlights the potential significance of noncanonical start codons, very few of which have been characterized experimentally. It also emphasizes the limitations of predicting start codons using bioinformatic approaches, which rely heavily on the assumption that ATG, GTG, and TTG are the only permissible start codons.
INTRODUCTION
Oxidative stress damages key macromolecules, including DNA and proteins. Therefore, the ability to respond to oxidative stress is critical for survival, and organisms have evolved diverse strategies to sense oxidative stress. Many of these rely on the reactivity of cysteine moieties in sensor proteins, with the oxidation or reduction of the cysteines having profound consequences for function. The activities of a number of transcription factors are controlled by thiol redox switches and regulate genes involved in oxidative stress responses (reviewed in references 1 and 2). For example, in the canonical redox-sensing transcription factor OxyR, formation of a reversible disulfide bridge between two conserved cysteines leads to large structural changes in the protein, and the oxidized form of OxyR activates a regulon of antioxidant genes (3, 4).
The principal oxidative stress response in Streptomyces is controlled by a regulatory system consisting of a sigma factor, SigR, and a redox-sensitive, SigR-specific antisigma factor, RsrA (5, 6). The antisigma factor contains one Zn(II) ion per monomer, coordinated by three cysteine residues and one histidine. Under reducing conditions, RsrA binds to SigR with nanomolar affinity and prevents it from associating with RNA polymerase to activate transcription (6, 7). When the cell encounters oxidative stress, an intramolecular disulfide bond forms in RsrA between two of the cysteines that coordinate the zinc ion, leading to expulsion of zinc and inactivation of RsrA as an antisigma factor (7–10). SigR is then released and activates the transcription of a regulon of more than 100 target genes (11–13).
The trxBA operon encoding a thioredoxin system and the genes specifying the biosynthesis of the thiol redox buffer mycothiol are key components of the SigR regulon (5, 14). Since the thioredoxin system and mycothiol are both able to reduce the intramolecular disulfide bond in oxidized RsrA, upregulation of these pathways restores the reducing environment of the cytosol and leads to reduction of RsrA to its active state (6, 14). RsrA then rebinds SigR, thereby shutting off SigR-dependent transcription and completing a homeostatic feedback loop.
When streptomycetes grow in the absence of oxidative stress, the sigR-rsrA operon is expressed from the promoter sigRp1. However, when they are exposed to oxidative stress and SigR is released from RsrA, it activates transcription of the sigR-rsrA operon from an upstream autoregulatory promoter, sigRp2 (5). From the p2 transcript, a longer isoform of the protein (SigR′) is translated from an upstream ATG start codon (15). Unlike the SigR isoform, which is stable, this SigR′ isoform is unstable because the 58-residue N-terminal extension present in SigR′ (but absent from SigR) renders it a substrate for Clp proteases, also members of the SigR regulon. This provides a second negative feedback loop, allowing the cell to dampen the SigR response once the stress has been dealt with and homeostasis has been restored (15).
In addition to the autoregulatory feedback loop described above, the expression of SigR is regulated at the transcriptional level in response to a number of antibiotics that specifically target the ribosome and interfere with protein synthesis (16). In response to antibiotic stress, the transcriptional regulator WblC induces the expression of the sigRp1 transcript and the synthesis of the shorter, stable isoform of the protein, SigR. Thus, SigR expression and activity are tightly controlled at a number of levels.
In addition to the components of the thioredoxin and mycoredoxin/mycothiol pathways, the SigR regulon also includes other proteins involved in the reduction of oxidized proteins such as methionine sulfoxide reductases, proteins involved in protein quality control such as chaperones and proteases, and others involved in transcription and translation (11–13). The latter class includes translation initiation factor 2 (IF2) and IF3, encoded by the infB and infC genes, respectively (13).
Translation IF3 is an essential protein in bacteria that functions as an initiation fidelity factor, repressing translation from noncanonical start codons by destabilizing 30S initiation complexes that include start codons other than ATG, GTG, and TTG (17). The gene encoding IF3 itself (infC) is a rare example of a well-characterized gene with a noncanonical start codon (18–23). infC has an ATT start codon in Escherichia coli (ATC in Streptomyces), and thus, IF3 autoregulates its own translation. When IF3 levels fall, translation of IF3 increases, leading to higher levels of IF3 and rerepression, thereby forming a translational homeostatic feedback loop (18, 21).
Here we show that sigR has a highly unusual GTC start codon and that this leads to another level of SigR regulation, in which SigR translation is repressed by IF3. Changing the GTC to a canonical start codon or introducing mutations that impair IF3 functioning causes SigR to be overproduced relative to its antisigma factor RsrA, resulting in unregulated and constitutive expression of the SigR regulon. We also show that rsrA has its own dedicated promoter and that RsrA is produced through a combination of incomplete translational coupling to sigR and sigR-independent translation arising from ribosome entry at a dedicated rsrA ribosome binding site (RBS). The net result of these arrangements is that RsrA is produced in excess over SigR.
RESULTS
sigR uses a noncanonical GTC start codon.
The annotated start codon of Streptomyces coelicolor sigR is GTG (Fig. 1A). Two facts made us doubt this assignment. First, this GTG codon is inappropriately positioned because it is internal to the extensive predicted AGGAGGTG sigR RBS (Fig. 1A). Second, when we purified SigR from natural abundance in S. coelicolor and subjected it to Edman degradation, the N-terminal sequence was TGTDAGTEH (in four separate preparations [5]). If the GTG codon were correctly assigned as the start codon, this would imply that four N-terminal residues (fMGPV) were removed posttranslationally, which seemed unlikely. To address this issue, we individually changed the annotated second, third, and fourth codons (GGT CCG GTC) to a TGA stop codon, introduced the resulting sigR alleles into a Δ(sigR-rsrA) null strain (J2146), and assayed disulfide reductase activity as a proxy for SigR activity [in the absence of RsrA, SigR drives high levels of expression of multiple thioredoxin genes, and the resulting disulfide reductase activity can be monitored by measuring the reduction of the synthetic, disulfide-containing, chromogenic substrate 5,5′-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB)]. SigR was still active when the GGT or CCG codon was mutated, but changing the GTC codon abolished SigR activity in vivo (Fig. 1B). We also analyzed these strains by Western blotting and found that changing the GTC codon to TGA abolished SigR production, whereas SigR was still produced when the GGT or CCG codon was changed to TGA (Fig. 1C and D). From these results, we concluded that SigR has a highly unusual GTC start codon and that the N-terminal fMet that it encodes is removed posttranslationally to leave mature SigR with a TGTDAGTEH N terminus (Fig. 1A).
The noncanonical GTC sigR start codon is critical for correct and proper functioning of the oxidative stress regulatory system.
To determine the biological importance of the GTC start codon of sigR, we changed it to canonical start codons. To focus solely on SigR, we used an integrative plasmid that carried the sigR-rsrA operon expressed from just the p1 promoter (p1-sigR-rsrA). This prevented expression of the longer SigR′ isoform, which is only expressed from the upstream p2 autoregulatory promoter. We introduced parallel constructs differing only in the sigR start codon into the S. coelicolor Δ(sigR-rsrA) null strain (J2146). Initially, we tested the effects on these mutations on SigR expression by Western blotting and found that when GTC was changed to any of the canonical start codons (ATG, GTG, or TTG), SigR was overexpressed relative to the wild-type GTC start codon (Fig. 2A and B). Unexpectedly, we consistently saw that a TTG start codon led to higher levels of SigR than either ATG or GTG. This echoes the findings of Myronovskyi et al. (24), who found that TTG also serves as a more efficient start codon than ATG or GTG for the gus reporter gene.
Regulation of the SigR-RsrA system is of critical importance to the biology of the organism, as shown by the fact that uncontrolled SigR activity (SigR > RsrA) blocks Streptomyces sporulation, causing the colonies to display a characteristic “white” (Spo−) phenotype due to the lack of synthesis of the gray spore pigment. Although the reasons for this phenotype are not understood (one possibility is competition between SigR and sporulation-specific sigma factors for core RNA polymerase), it provides an extremely convenient visual means to assay SigR activity (25). ΔsigR ΔrsrA double mutants sporulate normally (Spo+), showing that the developmental defect of the ΔrsrA single mutant is due to unchecked SigR activity (25). We therefore also looked at the effects of the start codon changes on sporulation and found that whereas the control construct carrying p1-sigR-rsrA with the wild-type GTC sigR start codon did not alter the gray (Spo+) phenotype of J2146, changes in canonical start codons each caused a full white (Spo−) phenotype (Fig. 2C). We concluded that changing the sigR GTC start codon to a canonical start codon causes SigR to be produced in excess over RsrA (SigR > RsrA). Thus, the sigR GTC start codon is a critical component of the oxidative stress response, and the SigR-RsrA regulatory system fails to function properly without it.
SigR and RsrA are not produced at equimolar levels, and rsrA can be translated independently of sigR.
As is often the case in sigma-antisigma operons (26, 27), the start codon of the downstream rsrA gene overlaps the stop codon of the upstream sigR gene in the ATGA manner (Fig. 3A). As a consequence, it has been assumed that the two genes are translationally coupled (28, 29) to ensure that the two proteins are made in equimolar amounts and that all translation of rsrA would depend on the prior translation of sigR (2, 6, 25, 30). The fact that changing the sigR start codon to ATG caused a white (Spo−) phenotype, as described above, implied that the translational coupling of sigR and rsrA is incomplete, such that the increase in SigR translation was not reflected in an equal increase in the level of RsrA translation (SigR > RsrA).
To address this question experimentally, we used a version of the gusA (β-glucuronidase) reporter gene codon optimized for use in Streptomyces (24). These experiments were performed with Streptomyces venezuelae because S. coelicolor produces the intensely blue-pigmented antibiotic actinorhodin, which interferes with the detection of Gus activity with the chromogenic substrate 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-glucuronic acid (X-Gluc). We made a full-length translational fusion of sigR to gusA (to exclude any autoregulatory effects, we did not include the SigR-dependent sigRp2 promoter, so that the fusion protein was transcribed only from the sigRp1 promoter) (Fig. 3B). We introduced this sigR-gusA translational reporter and an equivalent rsrA-gusA translational fusion (Fig. 3B) into wild-type S. venezuelae and found higher levels of expression with the rsrA-gus fusion construct than with the sigR-gus construct (Fig. 3C). Furthermore, we found that mutation of the SigR GTC start codon to ATG caused an ~4-fold increase in sigR-gus expression but had little effect on the expression of the equivalent rsrA-gus construct (Fig. 3C), again suggesting that translational coupling of sigR and rsrA was incomplete. Through mutagenesis of the sigR start codon to a TGA stop codon, we showed that all sigR translation depended on the presence of its GTC start codon, as expected. However, we unexpectedly found that ~50% of rsrA translation still occurred in the absence of sigR translation (Fig. 3C).
Seeking to account for this observation, we identified an appropriately spaced putative RBS (GAAAGG) 9 bp upstream of the rsrA ATG start codon (Fig. 3A). Mutation of the putative rsrA RBS in the construct carrying the GTC-to-TGA change at the sigR start codon abolished all remaining rsrA translation (Fig. 3C). Thus, RsrA appears to be produced through a combination of incomplete translational coupling to sigR and sigR-independent translation arising from ribosome entry at a dedicated rsrA RBS. Taken together, these results suggested that, in the absence of oxidative stress, RsrA is produced in excess over SigR and SigR is sequestered as a result.
To investigate this issue further, we introduced the ATGsigR-rsrA operon into the wild-type strain (M600). Whereas we had previously found that this allele generated a white (Spo−) phenotype in a Δ(sigR-rsrA) null strain (J2146), we found that the white phenotype of the ATGsigR-rsrA allele was recessive to the wild-type chromosomal GTCsigR-rsrA locus (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). This finding implies that RsrA is normally produced in excess of SigR and that sufficient free RsrA is produced from the native GTCsigR-rsrA locus to sequester the excess SigR derived from the ATGsigR-rsrA allele in the merodiploid strain.
To test whether the rsrA RBS and sigR-independent translation of RsrA are important for the production of RsrA in excess over SigR, we next made four separate mutations to weaken the RBS (Fig. 4). Three of these RBS mutations did not alter the amino acid sequence of SigR, while the fourth (GAAAGG to GCGTGG) resulted in a conservative arginine-to-lysine substitution in SigR. We introduced these mutations into the p1-sigR-rsrA operon carried on integrative plasmid pRT801 and moved the resulting constructs into the Δ(sigR-rsrA) null strain (J2146). In each case, the mutant RBS allele conferred a white (Spo−) phenotype, suggesting that SigR was being produced in excess over RsrA, whereas the Δ(sigR-rsrA) null strain carrying the wild-type p1-sigR-rsrA allele sporulated normally, as expected (Fig. 4B).
rsrA can be transcribed independently of sigR.
The sigR-rsrA operon has long been known to be transcribed from the sigRp1 and sigRp2 promoters upstream of the sigR gene (Fig. 5A). Realizing that rsrA had its own RBS, we then wondered whether it might also be transcribed independently of sigR from a dedicated promoter internal to the sigR gene. We therefore cloned the 300 bp upstream of the rsrA start codon into a gus promoter probe vector, pIJ10742. As controls, we also cloned the sigRp1 and sigRp2 promoters individually into the same vector. We then tested the promoter activity of these three fragments in S. venezuelae and found that all three drove β-glucuronidase expression (Fig. 5B). Expression from the SigR-dependent sigRp2 promoter was relatively low under these noninducing conditions. Expression from the rsrAp promoter was lower than that from the sigRp1 promoter but higher than that from the uninduced sigRp2 autoregulatory promoter.
We determined the precise location of the rsrAp promoter as part of a genome-wide transcription start site mapping experiment. The rsrAp transcription start site sits within the 300-bp fragment cloned into the gus promoter probe vector, lying downstream of −10 and −35 elements likely to be recognized by the principal, essential sigma factor in Streptomyces, HrdB (Fig. 5C).
sigR translation is regulated by IF3.
A number of in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that IF3 represses translation from noncanonical start codons in E. coli (18–23, 31, 32). To determine if IF3 also represses translation from the GTC start codon of sigR in S. coelicolor, we increased IF3 levels by introducing a second copy of infC, expressed from a strong constitutive promoter (ermE*p) on an integrative plasmid. This overexpression of IF3 caused a decrease in SigR levels, consistent with the idea that IF3 represses SigR translation (Fig. 6A and B).
Although infC is an essential gene, a variety of viable E. coli infC* fidelity mutants with impaired IF3 functioning have been isolated that, depending on their severity, result in a 3- to 15-fold increase in translation from noncanonical start codons (18). Since several of the IF3 residues affected in these E. coli infC* strains are conserved in Streptomyces IF3 (see Fig. S2), we reconstructed three of these mutations as S. coelicolor alleles and introduced them at the native infC locus, creating S. coelicolor strains that produced only an IF3* mutant protein. Western blotting showed that SigR was expressed at higher levels in each of the three infC* fidelity mutant strains than in the wild type (Fig. 6C and D). The infC* fidelity mutants showed a partial white (Spo−) phenotype, producing a mixture of undifferentiated hyphae with occasional irregular spore chains (Fig. 6E).
The regulatory elements of the SigR-RsrA system are highly conserved across Streptomyces species.
We looked across 34 sequenced Streptomyces genomes to determine if the various regulatory elements described above are conserved (see Table S1). The extensive sigR RBS (AGGAGGTG) was highly conserved across the 34 sigR homologs. The sigR GTC start codon was present in 32 of the 34 Streptomyces species, but Streptomyces griseoflavus and Streptomyces griseorubens instead had a GTT codon at this position. It therefore seems likely that sigR has a noncanonical GTT start codon in a minority of Streptomyces species. The rsrAp promoter was readily identifiable in all 34 homologs. While the −10 sequence was invariant, a number of differences were found in the −35 sequence, the most prominent of which, TTGCG instead of TTGCC, accounted for nearly half of the sequences examined. Finally, the S. coelicolor rsrA RBS (GAAAGG) was the same in 33 species but was GGAAGG in Streptomyces xiamenensis.
DISCUSSION
In all sigma-antisigma regulatory switches, the relative abundance of the two proteins is critical to the proper functioning of the system. We describe here a novel mechanism of translational control of the sigma factor SigR and its cognate antisigma factor RsrA that may have broader implications for understanding the expression of other sigma-antisigma pairs. We show that sigR has a highly unusual GTC start codon and that this leads to repression of SigR translation by IF3 (Fig. 7). Replacement of the GTC codon with any of the three canonical start codons (ATG, GTG, TTG) causes SigR to be produced in excess of RsrA, resulting in constitutive, uncontrolled expression of the SigR regulon. In the same way, IF3* mutations that impair the ability of IF3 to repress noncanonical start codons also result in an excess of SigR over RsrA and unchecked expression of the oxidative stress response. Thus, the noncanonical GTC sigR start codon and its repression by IF3 are essential for correct and proper functioning of the oxidative stress regulatory switch in Streptomyces. To our knowledge, sigR is the first documented example of a gene that uses a GTC start codon.
IF3 functions to repress translation initiation at noncanonical start codons. It binds to the small (30S) ribosomal subunit and regulates the fidelity with which the mRNA start codon and initiator tRNA substrates are selected into the 30S initiation complex. IF3 exists in a dynamic equilibrium between different conformational states, and recognition of a proper anticodon-codon interaction between the fMet initiator tRNA and the start codon in the 30S initiation complex shifts this equilibrium toward a single conformation of IF3. This conformation promotes progress along the initiation pathway and stabilizes contacts with the 50S subunit that lead to the formation of the 70S initiation complex and the elongation phase of protein synthesis (32, 33). It seems possible that the very extensive RBS (AGGAGGTG) upstream of the sigR GTC start codon helps to stabilize the otherwise unfavorable formation of an initiation complex containing the fMet initiator tRNA mispaired with the GTC codon. However, it is clear that the kinetics of translation initiation at the sigR start codon and the role of IF3, particularly under oxidative stress conditions, merit further study.
Previously, it had been assumed that all transcription of rsrA arose from the p1 and p2 promoters that lie upstream of sigR, that sigR and rsrA were translationally coupled via the ATGA arrangement of their respective stop and start codons, and that all translation of rsrA would depend on translation of the upstream sigR gene, leading to production of the two proteins in a fixed 1:1 stoichiometry. Here we have shown that RsrA is produced in excess over SigR and that this excess is ensured through a combination of (i) incomplete translational coupling to sigR and (ii) independent transcription and translation of rsrA arising from its own dedicated promoter and RBS, both internal to the sigR coding sequence. The rsrA promoter and RBS sequences are highly conserved across Streptomyces species, and mutation of the rsrA RBS results in SigR expression in excess over RsrA and constitutive expression of the SigR regulon.
The SigR-RsrA system was first characterized in Streptomyces, but it is present throughout the actinomycetes, including important clinical pathogens such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Corynebacterium diphtheriae. The SigR-RsrA (SigH-RshA) system has been shown to be important for the pathogenesis of M. tuberculosis (34), presumably because it helps pathogens to resist oxidative killing by white blood cells. While the noncanonical GTC start codon is well conserved across Streptomyces sigR homologs, there is no evidence of its use in these other actinobacterial genera. Both the M. tuberculosis and C. glutamicum sigH genes are annotated as having canonical ATG start codons, and in the case of M. tuberculosis, a large-scale proteomic analysis identified a peptide corresponding to this annotated start site (35). In C. glutamicum, the ATG codon is downstream of an appropriately placed RBS, supporting its annotation as the start codon.
infC, the gene encoding IF3, has several promoters, one of which is a direct target of SigR (13) (Fig. 7). This raised the possibility that a previously unrecognized translational homeostatic feedback loop could regulate SigR activity, in which IF3 functioning was directly or indirectly compromised by oxidative stress, leading to derepression of the sigR GTC start codon, a transient excess of SigR over RsrA, and increased expression of the SigR regulon, including the gene encoding IF3. This speculative possibility seemed especially attractive given that Cys65 of E. coli IF3 is known to become oxidized in vivo during hypochlorite stress (36), suggesting that IF3 might sense oxidative stress directly. Further, this cysteine is conserved in Streptomyces IF3. However, to date, we have not been able to demonstrate enhanced translation of SigR from the GTC start codon in response to oxidative stress. It will be important in the future, therefore, to examine the translation of SigR under a broader range of different oxidative conditions and to understand the biological rationale behind the wiring of a regulatory network that places SigR directly under the control of IF3.
Our data suggest that SigR translation from its noncanonical GTC start codon is limited by IF3 and that independent transcription and translation of rsrA ensure that RsrA is present in excess of SigR, providing a buffer to prevent spurious release of SigR activity. In this context, it is interesting to note that the antisigma factor has also been shown to be more abundant than the sigma factor in two other systems, E. coli SigE/RseA and FliA/FlgM (37). Further, translation of E. coli sigE has been shown to be limited by the second codon, and the kinetics of the stress response can be altered by changes in the basal level of SigE expression (38). Many sigma-antisigma factor pairs are encoded by cotranscribed and overlapping open reading frames, which are assumed to be translationally coupled. To query whether the translational imbalance seen in the SigR-RsrA switch might be a more general phenomenon in sigma-antisigma systems, we examined the sequences of 16 other putative sigma-antisigma operons from the S. coelicolor genome. In 15 of 16 cases, we found a candidate RBS appropriately positioned upstream of the start codon of the downstream putative antisigma factor gene (see Fig. S3), suggesting that the antisigma factor can be translated independently of the sigma factor in each of these cases.
Finally, our work highlights the limitations of predicting start codons using bioinformatic approaches, which rely heavily on the assumption that ATG, GTG, and TTG are the only permissible start codons. As an illustration, the sigR start codon is misannotated to a nearby upstream canonical start codon in all available streptomycete genomes, and the infC start codon is similarly misannotated in most Streptomyces species, even though the use of a noncanonical start codon by infC is well documented in the literature. It seems likely that the experimental identification of start codons through global ribosome profiling will be the most effective way to circumvent this difficulty (37, 39) and thus generate an accurate picture of the totality of genes subject to IF3-mediated translational repression.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains, plasmids, oligonucleotides, and culture conditions.
The strains, plasmids, and oligonucleotides used in this study are listed in Table S2. S. coelicolor strains (M600 and derivatives) were routinely grown on SFM agar or in TSB/YEME liquid medium (40); S. venezuelae was routinely grown on MYM agar or in liquid MYM medium (41). Where indicated, oxidants were added to the growth medium to induce oxidative stress. Conjugation was used to introduce cosmids and plasmids into Streptomyces as described previously (40).
Introduction of unmarked point mutations into the chromosomal infC locus.
To construct an infC* mutant strain, we developed a simple method for introducing unmarked point mutations into the chromosome of Streptomyces. First, we used PCR targeting (42, 43) to introduce an apr-oriT cassette (pIJ794) into a cosmid (StI35) containing our gene of interest (infC in this case), replacing the kanamycin resistance marker already present on the cosmid backbone. Second, we replaced the wild-type infC allele with the mutant infC* alleles. To do this, we took advantage of the fact that E. coli strains deficient in mismatch repair (mutS) have a very high frequency of lambda red-mediated recombination of single-stranded DNA, high enough that there is no need for a selectable marker (44). We transformed the mutS recombineering strain HME68 carrying the apr-oriT derivative of cosmid StI35 with a 60-mer oligonucleotide carrying the desired point mutation. We then screened for candidates with the directed point mutation either by PCR (based on primers binding to the mutant allele but not the wild type) or PCR followed by diagnostic restriction digestion.
Once we had identified cosmids carrying the desired mutation, we transformed DH5α with them to generate a clonal population, isolated mutant cosmid DNA, and confirmed the presence of the mutation (and the lack of extraneous mutations) by sequencing of infC. The mutant cosmids were then moved into the recipient Streptomyces strain, selecting first for introduction of the cosmid (apramycin resistance). After restreaking several times under nonselective conditions, we screened for apramycin-sensitive derivatives in which a double crossover had occurred. We observed that roughly half of the double-crossover exconjugants had a developmental defect. Using the same approach described above (mismatch PCR or PCR of infC followed by diagnostic restriction digestion), we confirmed that the white exconjugants were infC* mutants while the gray (Spo+) exconjugants were infC+ (wild type). We also sequenced the infC allele in three or four exconjugants to confirm the results of the diagnostic PCRs.
Cloning and site-directed mutagenesis.
Standard techniques were used for PCR amplification, restriction digestion, and cloning, and QuikChange mutagenesis was used to introduce point mutations in accordance with the Stratagene protocol. All constructs were sequenced (MWG Eurofins).
gusA reporter constructs.
To create a pMS82-gusA reporter plasmid, the fragment containing aadA, its flanking transcription terminator upstream of the gusA gene multiple cloning site, and gusA was excised from the pGUS plasmid (24) as a PvuII fragment and then subcloned into the EcoRV site of pMS82 (45). Next, site-directed mutagenesis was used to introduce unique NdeI and XbaI sites into the gusA multiple cloning site, generating pIJ10742. This vector was used as a negative control in gus assays. We also generated a positive control, where the gus gene was under the control the of ermE*p promoter, as follows. First, the ermE*p promoter was excised from pIJ10257 (46) with Asp718 and XbaI, gel purified, and ligated into the pGUS vector digested with Asp718 and SpeI. The gus reporter, including the upstream aadA gene flanked by transcriptional terminators, was then excised with PvuII and subcloned into similarly digested pMS82 (45), generating pIJ10741 (pMS82-ermE*p-gus). To construct transcriptional fusions, the sigRp1 (pIJ10850), sigRp2 (pIJ10851), and rsrAp (pIJ10881) promoter fragments were amplified from S. venezuelae genomic DNA by PCR with the oligonucleotides listed in Table S2, digested with NdeI and XbaI, and ligated into similarly digested pIJ10742. In all of these constructs, the gus reporter gene is expressed with its own RBS and ATG start site.
The translational GusA reporters were subcloned from pGUS-HL4aadA (23) into pMS82 (45) by the following approach. First, p1-sigR and p1-sigR-rsrA were amplified by PCR from S. venezuelae 5KO8 cosmid DNA with primers Sven-SigR-Gus1/Sven-SigR-Gus2 and Sven-SigR-Gus1/Sven-RsrA-Gus2. The PCR products were digested with XbaI and EcoRV and then ligated into similarly digested pGUS-HL4aadA, generating constructs where the gusA gene was fused to the last codon of the sigR and the rsrA genes, respectively. QuikChange mutagenesis was then used to mutate the sigR start codon to either ATG or TGA in both the sigR-gus and rsrA-gus constructs. These constructs were then subcloned into pMS82 by PCR amplification of the reporter construct (including the upstream flanking aadA gene and transcriptional terminator preventing readthrough into the gus gene) with the oligonucleotides Gus1-NsiI and Gus2-KpnI, digestion with NsiI and KpnI, and ligation into similarly digested pMS82.
sigR-rsrA constructs.
For the experiments shown in Fig. 1, inverse PCR was used to introduce TGA mutations into sigR in pIJ5981 (25), which contains sigR together with both upstream promoters but lacks the downstream rsrA gene. The sigR mutant genes were then cloned as XbaI fragments into pSET152 and introduced into S. coelicolor J2146 (ΔsigR-rsrA) by conjugation.
For subsequent experiments, vectors for expression of the sigR-rsrA operon were constructed as follows. First, the entire operon (including the sigRp1 promoter but excluding the autoregulatory sigRp2 promoter) was amplified by PCR from St7E4 cosmid DNA with primers Sco-p1SigR-BamHI and ScoRsrArev-EcoRV, digested with BamHI and EcoRV, and ligated into similarly cut pRT801. This generated pIJ10863, where the sigR-rsrA operon is expressed from its own sigRp1 promoter and sigR is translated from its native GTC start codon. QuikChange mutagenesis was then performed to change this GTC start codon to either a canonical start codon or a stop codon: Sco-SigR-ATG (pIJ10864), Sco-SigR-TTG (pIJ10865), Sco-SigR-GTG (pIJ10866), and Sco-SigR-TGA (pIJ10867).
Wes analysis.
For analysis of SigR protein levels, we used the quantitative Wes capillary electrophoresis and blotting system (ProteinSimple, San Jose, CA) with the Wes-Rabbit (12 to 230 kDa) Master kit and Split buffer (Biotechne). Wes uses an automated, capillary-based method for immunodetection of proteins. Protein samples were prepared for Wes in accordance with the manufacturer’s directions. We determined the optimal conditions for α-SigR Wes and showed, by using purified protein, that the signal was within the linear range. Cell lysates were diluted to a final protein concentration of 0.5 mg/ml, and the α-SigR antibody was used at a dilution of 1:400. For each experiment, samples were assayed in triplicate (technical replicates). Data were analyzed with the Compass software (version 2.6.7).
Disulfide reductase assays.
S. coelicolor strains were grown in NMMP (40) supplemented with 1% (wt/vol) glucose to an optical density at 450 nm of 1.0 (mid to late log phase). The mycelium was harvested by centrifugation, washed in ice-cold 0.9% NaCl, resuspended in ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5] 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA), disrupted by sonication, and then centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 10 min to obtain a cell-free lysate. Disulfide reductase assays were performed with DTNB as described previously (5).
β-Glucuronidase activity assays.
For qualitative analysis of Gus reporter fusions, S. venezuelae strains expressing the relevant constructs were grown on MYM agar containing trace elements and 0.16 mg/ml X-Gluc (Gold Biotechnologies). Where necessary, oxidants were added to paper disks and placed on the growth medium to induce oxidative stress in the reporter strains. To quantify the expression of reporter constructs, β-glucuronidase assays were performed as described previously (24), done in triplicate, and repeated at least three times.
Scanning electron microscopy.
Scanning electron microscopy was performed as described previously (47).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Karthik Rajasekar and Colin Kleanthous for the purified SigR protein used to raise the polyclonal antiserum, Gary Janssen for helpful discussion, Matt Bush for his comments on the manuscript, and Susan Schlimpert for help in preparing the figures.
This work was funded by BBSRC grants BB/I00873X/1 and BB/L019825/1 to M.J.B. and by BBSRC Institute Strategic Programme grant BB/J004561/1 to the John Innes Centre.
This article is dedicated to the memory of Gary R. Janssen (1951 to 2015), a great microbiologist and the kindest of friends.
Footnotes
Citation Feeney MA, Chandra G, Findlay KC, Paget MSB, Buttner MJ. 2017. Translational control of the SigR-directed oxidative stress response in Streptomyces via IF3-mediated repression of a noncanonical GTC start codon. mBio 8:e00815-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00815-17.
REFERENCES
- 1.Antelmann H, Helmann JD. 2011. Thiol-based redox switches and gene regulation. Antioxid Redox Signal 14:1049–1063. doi: 10.1089/ars.2010.3400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Paget MSB, Buttner MJ. 2003. Thiol-based regulatory switches. Annu Rev Genet 37:91–121. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.142538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Storz G, Tartaglia LA, Ames BN. 1990. Transcriptional regulator of oxidative stress-inducible genes: direct activation by oxidation. Science 248:189–194. doi: 10.1126/science.2183352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Choi H-J, Kim S-J, Mukhopadhyay P, Cho S, Woo J-R, Storz G, Ryu SE. 2001. Structural basis of the redox switch in the OxyR transcription factor. Cell 105:103–113. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00300-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Paget MSB, Kang JG, Roe JH, Buttner MJ. 1998. sigmaR, an RNA polymerase sigma factor that modulates expression of the thioredoxin system in response to oxidative stress in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). EMBO J 17:5776–5782. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.19.5776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kang JG, Paget MSB, Seok YJ, Hahn MY, Bae JB, Hahn JS, Kleanthous C, Buttner MJ, Roe JH. 1999. RsrA, an anti-sigma factor regulated by redox change. EMBO J 18:4292–4298. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.15.4292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rajasekar KV, Zdanowski K, Yan J, Hopper JT, Francis ML, Seepersad C, Sharp C, Pecqueur L, Werner JM, Robinson CV, Mohammed S, Potts JR, Kleanthous C. 2016. The anti-sigma factor RsrA responds to oxidative stress by reburying its hydrophobic core. Nat Commun 7:12194. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Li W, Bottrill AR, Bibb MJ, Buttner MJ, Paget MSB, Kleanthous C. 2003. The role of zinc in the disulphide stress-regulated anti-sigma factor RsrA from Streptomyces coelicolor. J Mol Biol 333:461–472. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.08.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bae JB, Park JH, Hahn MY, Kim MS, Roe JH. 2004. Redox-dependent changes in RsrA, an anti-sigma factor in Streptomyces coelicolor: zinc release and disulfide bond formation. J Mol Biol 335:425–435. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.10.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zdanowski K, Doughty P, Jakimowicz P, O’Hara L, Buttner MJ, Paget MSB, Kleanthous C. 2006. Assignment of the zinc ligands in RsrA, a redox-sensing ZAS protein from Streptomyces coelicolor. Biochemistry 45:8294–8300. doi: 10.1021/bi060711v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Paget MSB, Molle V, Cohen G, Aharonowitz Y, Buttner MJ. 2001. Defining the disulphide stress response in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2): identification of the sigmaR regulon. Mol Microbiol 42:1007–1020. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02675.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kallifidas D, Thomas D, Doughty P, Paget MSB. 2010. The sigmaR regulon of Streptomyces coelicolor A32 reveals a key role in protein quality control during disulphide stress. Microbiology 156:1661–1672. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.037804-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kim MS, Dufour YS, Yoo JS, Cho YB, Park JH, Nam GB, Kim HM, Lee KL, Donohue TJ, Roe JH. 2012. Conservation of thiol-oxidative stress responses regulated by SigR orthologues in actinomycetes. Mol Microbiol 85:326–344. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08115.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Park JH, Roe JH. 2008. Mycothiol regulates and is regulated by a thiol-specific antisigma factor RsrA and sigma(R) in Streptomyces coelicolor. Mol Microbiol 68:861–870. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06191.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kim MS, Hahn MY, Cho Y, Cho SN, Roe JH. 2009. Positive and negative feedback regulatory loops of thiol-oxidative stress response mediated by an unstable isoform of sigmaR in actinomycetes. Mol Microbiol 73:815–825. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06824.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yoo JS, Oh GS, Ryoo S, Roe JH. 2016. Induction of a stable sigma factor SigR by translation-inhibiting antibiotics confers resistance to antibiotics. Sci Rep 6:28628. doi: 10.1038/srep28628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Petrelli D, LaTeana A, Garofalo C, Spurio R, Pon CL, Gualerzi CO. 2001. Translation initiation factor IF3: two domains, five functions, one mechanism? EMBO J 20:4560–4569. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.16.4560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sussman JK, Simons EL, Simons RW. 1996. Escherichia coli translation initiation factor 3 discriminates the initiation codon in vivo. Mol Microbiol 21:347–360. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.6371354.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Butler JS, Springer M, Dondon J, Graffe M, Grunberg-Manago M. 1986. Escherichia coli protein synthesis initiation factor IF3 controls its own gene expression at the translational level in vivo. J Mol Biol 192:767–780. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90027-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Butler JS, Springer M, Grunberg-Manago M. 1987. AUU-to-AUG mutation in the initiator codon of the translation initiation factor IF3 abolishes translational autocontrol of its own gene (infC) in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 84:4022–4025. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.12.4022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sacerdot C, Chiaruttini C, Engst K, Graffe M, Milet M, Mathy N, Dondon J, Springer M. 1996. The role of the AUU initiation codon in the negative feedback regulation of the gene for translation initiation factor IF3 in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 21:331–346. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.6361359.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sacerdot C, de Cock E, Engst K, Graffe M, Dardel F, Springer M. 1999. Mutations that alter initiation codon discrimination by Escherichia coli initiation factor IF3. J Mol Biol 288:803–810. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hecht A, Glasgow J, Jaschke PR, Bawazer LA, Munson MS, Cochran JR, Endy D, Salit M. 2017. Measurements of translation initiation from all 64 codons in E. coli. Nucleic Acids Res 45:3615–3626. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Myronovskyi M, Welle E, Fedorenko V, Luzhetskyy A. 2011. β-Glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile reporter in actinomycetes. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:5370–5383. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00434-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Paget MSB, Bae JB, Hahn MY, Li W, Kleanthous C, Roe JH, Buttner MJ. 2001. Mutational analysis of RsrA, a zinc-binding anti-sigma factor with a thiol-disulphide redox switch. Mol Microbiol 39:1036–1047. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02298.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mascher T. 2013. Signaling diversity and evolution of extracytoplasmic function (ECF) σ factors. Curr Opin Microbiol 16:148–155. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2013.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Staroń A, Sofia HJ, Dietrich S, Ulrich LE, Liesegang H, Mascher T. 2009. The third pillar of bacterial signal transduction: classification of the extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factor protein family. Mol Microbiol 74:557–581. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06870.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Oppenheim DS, Yanofsky C. 1980. Translational coupling during expression of the tryptophan operon of Escherichia coli. Genetics 95:785–795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yu JS, Madison-Antenucci S, Steege DA. 2001. Translation at higher than an optimal level interferes with coupling at an intercistronic junction. Mol Microbiol 42:821–834. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02681.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.den Hengst CD, Buttner MJ. 2008. Redox control in actinobacteria. Biochim Biophys Acta 1780:1201–1216. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2008.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Milon P, Konevega AL, Gualerzi CO, Rodnina MV. 2008. Kinetic checkpoint at a late step in translation initiation. Mol Cell 30:712–720. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Elvekrog MM, Gonzalez RL. 2013. Conformational selection of translation initiation factor 3 signals proper substrate selection. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20:628–633. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.MacDougall DD, Gonzalez RL. 2015. Translation initiation factor 3 regulates switching between different modes of ribosomal subunit joining. J Mol Biol 427:1801–1818. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.09.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kaushal D, Schroeder BG, Tyagi S, Yoshimatsu T, Scott C, Ko C, Carpenter L, Mehrotra J, Manabe YC, Fleischmann RD, Bishai WR. 2002. Reduced immunopathology and mortality despite tissue persistence in a Mycobacterium tuberculosis mutant lacking alternative sigma factor, SigH. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:8330–8335. doi: 10.1073/pnas.102055799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kelkar DS, Kumar D, Kumar P, Balakrishnan L, Muthusamy B, Yadav AK, Shrivastava P, Marimuthu A, Anand S, Sundaram H, Kingsbury R, Harsha HC, Nair B, Prasad TS, Chauhan DS, Katoch K, Katoch VM, Kumar P, Chaerkady R, Ramachandran S, Dash D, Pandey A. 2011. Proteogenomic analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by high resolution mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics 10:M111.011627. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M111.011445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Leichert LI, Gehrke F, Gudiseva HV, Blackwell T, Ilbert M, Walker AK, Strahler JR, Andrews PC, Jakob U. 2008. Quantifying changes in the thiol redox proteome upon oxidative stress in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:8197–8202. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707723105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Li GW, Burkhardt D, Gross C, Weissman JS. 2014. Quantifying absolute protein synthesis rates reveals principles underlying allocation of cellular resources. Cell 157:624–635. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Konovalova A, Schwalm JA, Silhavy TJ. 2016. A suppressor mutation that creates a faster and more robust σE envelope stress response. J Bacteriol 198:2345–2351. doi: 10.1128/JB.00340-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jeong Y, Kim JN, Kim MW, Bucca G, Cho S, Yoon YJ, Kim BG, Roe JH, Kim SC, Smith CP, Cho BK. 2016. The dynamic transcriptional and translational landscape of the model antibiotic producer Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). Nat Commun 7:11605. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kieser T, Bibb MJ, Buttner MJ, Chater KF, Hopwood DA. 2000. Practical streptomyces genetics. John Innes Foundation, Norwich, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Stuttard C. 1982. Temperate phages of Streptomyces venezuelae: lysogeny and host specificity shown by phages SV1 and SV2. J Gen Microbiol 128:115–121. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gust B, Challis GL, Fowler K, Kieser T, Chater KF. 2003. PCR-targeted Streptomyces gene replacement identifies a protein domain needed for biosynthesis of the sesquiterpene soil odor geosmin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:1541–1546. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0337542100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gust B, Chandra G, Jakimowicz D, Yuqing T, Bruton CJ, Chater KF. 2004. Lambda red-mediated genetic manipulation of antibiotic-producing Streptomyces. Adv Appl Microbiol 54:107–128. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2164(04)54004-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Costantino N, Court DL. 2003. Enhanced levels of λ Red-mediated recombinants in mismatch repair mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:15748–15753. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2434959100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gregory MA, Till R, Smith MCM. 2003. Integration site for Streptomyces phage phiBT1 and development of site-specific integrating vectors. J Bacteriol 185:5320–5323. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.17.5320-5323.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hong HJ, Hutchings MI, Hill LM, Buttner MJ. 2005. The role of the novel Fem protein VanK in vancomycin resistance in Streptomyces coelicolor. J Biol Chem 280:13055–13061. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M413801200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bush MJ, Bibb MJ, Chandra G, Findlay KC, Buttner MJ. 2013. Genes required for aerial growth, cell division, and chromosome segregation are targets of WhiA before sporulation in Streptomyces venezuelae. mBio 4:e00684-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00684-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.