Abstract
The rapid developments of implantable biomedical electronics give rise to the motivation of exploring efficient and durable self-powered charging system. In this paper, we report a mesoporous polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF)-based implantable piezoelectric nanogenerator (NG) for in vivo biomechanical energy harvesting. The NG was built with a sponge-like mesoporous PVDF film and encapsulated by polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). After embedding this NG into rodents, a Voc of ~200 mV was produced from the gentle movement of rodent muscle. Meanwhile, no toxicity or incompatibility sign was found in the host after carrying the packaged NG for 6 weeks. Moreover, the electric output of this NG was extremely stable and exhibited no deterioration after 5 days of in vivo operation or 1.512 × 108 times mechanical deformation. This NG device could practically output a constant voltage of 52 mV via a 1 µF capacitor under living circumstance. The outstanding efficiency, magnificent durability and exceptional biocompatibility promise this mesoporous PVDF-based NG in accomplishing self-powered bioelectronics with potentially lifespan operation period.
Keywords: Biocompatibility, In vivo biomechanical energy harvesting, Mesoporous PVDF, Piezoelectric nanogenerator
1. Introduction
Piezoelectric nanogenerator (NG) is a promising technology for harvesting mechanical energy from ambient environment relying on the electromechanical coupling effect of piezoelectric materials [1–4]. Due to the broad material selection and flexible structural design, NGs have shown superior capability in scavenging mechanical energy in various forms including acoustic waves, physical deflections, fluid or gas flows, and human activities [5–13]. Among them, in vivo biomechanical energy harvesting is particularly attractive since this approach could lead to a sustainable energy source for implantable biomedical devices, which could significantly reduce the volume of powering component and avoid battery replacement [14–16]. Considerable endeavors have been devoted in employing NGs to harvesting mechanical energy from the motion of muscle or organs like heart, lung and diaphragm [16–21]. Most NGs tested inside living organisms used piezoelectric ceramics, such as zinc oxide, [18,19] barium titanate, [22] and lead zirconate titanate (PZT) [17,21,23]. In order to achieve high flexibility, these materials were typically constructed in nanostructure and/or nanocomposite forms. On the other hand, piezoelectric polymers were directly used in NG design owing to their intrinsic superior flexibility and elasticity. β-phase polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) is the most widely used piezoelectric polymers with merits of high piezoelectric coefficients (20–30 pC/N for d33 and 16 pC/N for d31), [24] excellent mechanical property and good biocompatibility [25–31]. These advantages encouraged a number of NG developments based on the piezoelectric PVDF [32–35].
Nevertheless, disregarding the great number of demonstrations of implantable NG designs, study of the biocompatibility and operation in a closed living biological environment is still very limited. The dynamic in vivo conditions could give rise to a number of critical issues that may not be a concern for in vitro tests. For example, the bio-fluid might respond to the polarized NG surfaces. Ions might infiltrate into the NG and deteriorate the piezoelectric property. The soft and irregular tissue surface might easily cause repelling or detachment of the NG component during normal body movement. It is also unclear how the biological surface would response to the high local piezoelectric potential generated in its vicinity. In this paper, we report a systematic study of the biocompatibility and in vivo operation of a mesoporous PVDF-based flexible NGs. The NG was built with a sponge-like mesoporous PVDF film and encapsulated by polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). The packaged NG was implanted under the skin of living mice and rats. Histological examination revealed no signs of toxicity or incompatibility during weeks of implantation. Appreciable piezoelectric output was obtained from the implanted NGs, which exhibited no deterioration after long-term in vivo operation. In vivo electricity routing and capacitor charging were also demonstrated inside the rat's body. This work provides valuable insights toward the biocompatibility and in vivo operation of flexible NGs for practically applications as an implantable biomechanical energy harvesting system.
2. Experimental section
2.1. Fabrication of Sponge-Like PVDF Thin Films
PVDF powder (Sigma Aldrich) was first dissolved in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) solvent with a concentration of 10 wt% at 70 °C. The PVDF solution was then mixed with ZnO nanoparticles (35–45 nm, US Research Nanomaterials, Inc.). The mass ratio between ZnO nanoparticles and PVDF was 50%. A uniformly distributed PVDF/ZnO suspension was obtained after treating the mixture in ultrasonic bath for 30 min. The suspension was then cast into a petri dish and dried in oven at 75 °C for approximate 10 min (depending on the film thickness). The films were subsequently immersed in a 37 wt% HCl solution for 3 h to completely remove the ZnO template. After acid etching and deionized water washing, the mesoporous PVDF thin films with a film thickness of ~30 µm were obtained.
2.2. Assembly and Measurement of PVDF NG
The mesoporous PVDF film was first cut to 1 cm × 2 cm and 100 nm-thick interdigitated surface gold electrode was deposited by electron beam evaporation with a shadow mask. Then, the PVDF film was poled using the interdigitated electrodes in an oil bath with an electric field of 60 V/µm for 2 h. After that, the PVDF film was sandwiched between two PDMS films with distinct film thicknesses (100 µm and 1 mm). The layered structure was then sealed by dipping and curing the liquid PDMS elastomer and cross-linker. During the performance measurement, a periodical deflecting force was applied on the NG device using a computer controlled shaker with a frequency of 20 Hz and a force of 6 N (quantified by a Force Gauge HF-500 N). The strain applied on the NG device was calculated to be ~0.1% on the basis of the cantilever model. The PDMS control sample was fabricated in a similar way by replacing the PVDF film with a PDMS film with identical film thickness. The voltage outputs were recorded using an Agilent DSO1012A oscilloscope. The current outputs were measured using an Autolab PGSTAT302N station. SEM image of mesoporous PVDF film was acquired with a LEO 1530 scanning electron microscope. FTIR characterizations of the PVDF films were performed by the Bruker Tensor 27 spectrometer.
2.3. Implantation of the PVDF NG
All animal studies were conducted under a protocol approved by the University of Wisconsin Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Adult Sprague-Dawley rats and six-week-old imprinting control region (ICR) mice (Harlan, Indianapolis, IN) were used to investigate the function of the NG in biological environment. Briefly, anesthesia was induced by inhalation of 2–5% isoflurane and maintained with 2% isoflurane. Following anesthesia, animals were fixed in the right lateral decubitus position. A 1–3 cm surgical incision was made to place the device. The NG was placed between the epithelial and muscle layer in the thigh or back region. The incision was sutured and the animal was connected to oscilloscope for measuring the voltage output. The NG was left under the skin and animals were allowed to recover. After the conclusion of studies, animals were euthanized and the NG, along with muscle, skin, and other tissues was collected for analysis. Computer tomography (CT) scans were performed using an Inveon microPET/microCT rodent model scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.).
2.4. Biocompatibility safety assessment of NG in mice
In vivo toxicity was assessed in mice by surgically extracting the NG from the surgical site at select time points post-implantation. Tissue containing the muscle and skin, with the device between these two layers, was obtained for histological analysis. The NG was removed before tissues were paraffin embedded and sectioned at 5 µm thickness for analysis. For comparison, similar tissues were extracted from the contralateral leg, which contained no devices. Tissue sections were hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained before analysis. Toxicity of the tissue was assessed in sections using four criteria, including: (1) degree of inflammatory infiltrate; (2) degree of fibrosis; (3) presence of muscle degeneration; and (4) presence and degree of cellular toxicities at implantation device (e.g., cellular shrinkage, condensation of chromatin, cell membrane viability, and presence of apoptotic bodies).
3. Results and discussion
The mesoporous PVDF thin films were fabricated using ZnO nanoparticles (NPs) as the sacrificial template, following the approach we reported previously [34]. Removing the ZnO NPs left randomly distributed pores with sizes of 30–500 nm in the PVDF films (Fig. S1). The phase of the mesoporous PVDF films was characterized by the Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrum (Fig. S2), where representative peaks of the piezoelectric β-phase at 840 and 1280 cm−1 could be clearly identified. The spontaneous formation of the β-phase was attributed to the interactions between the PVDF dipoles and surface charges on ZnO surfaces [7,34]. A fully assembled PVDF NG for implantation is shown in Fig. 1A. The mesoporous PVDF film was coated with a pair of interdigitated gold electrodes for piezoelectric charge collection, and the entire structure was packaged inside PDMS. According to our previous research, compared with the solid PVDF, introducing considerable porosity to the PVDF film could significantly increase its flexibility, [34] which is highly favorable for biomechanical energy harvesting. The interdigitated electrode was adopted to enable charge collection from the piezo vector of d33, which has the highest piezoelectric coefficient for PVDF [24]. Meanwhile, the thicknesses of PDMS films that covered the top and bottom sides of the PVDF film were designed to be 100 µm and 1 mm, respectively. This variation of PDMS film thicknesses was able to increase the tension and compression portion of internal dipoles and thus improve device performance.
The energy harvesting capability of the completely-packaged NG was first characterized by periodically deflecting the NG in a cantilever mode. The open-circuit voltage (Voc) and short-circuit current (Isc) are presented in Fig. 1B and C, respectively. When the shaker was operating at 20 Hz with a force of 6 N and a strain of ~0.1%, the average values of Voc and Isc reached 3.8 V and 3.5 µA, respectively, which outperformed a number of reported PVDF-based NGs [6,30,32,33,36]. This superior performance was mostly attributed to the optimized device geometry and structural advantage of the mesoporous PVDF thin film. In comparison, after replacing PVDF with PDMS (i.e., a representative triboelectric polymer with no piezoelectric response), the peak Voc sharply reduced to ~0.1 V (Fig. S3), meaning the output of this NG design was predominately from the piezoelectric effects rather than triboelectric effects of the PVDF film. The high piezoelectric output also suggested that the PDMS packaging had minimal influence to the mechanical-to-electrical energy conversion.
To evaluate the biocompatibility, a PVDF NG with a size of 6 mm × 6 mm was inserted under the skin of mice's right leg (Fig. 2A and S4). The bottom layer of NG was attached to the quadriceps femoris muscle surface. Fig. 2B shows a CT scan of the mouse that carried the NG for 5 days, where the metal electrode could be clearly observed revealing the steady implantation position of the NG under the mouse's normal activity. The mice with implanted NG were sacrificed at week 1, 2, 3 and 6 for histological examination. Surgery and sham control groups were extracted from the right and left legs of the animal, respectively. As shown in Fig. 2C, surgical pathology analysis revealed no overall differences between the NG-implanted and sham thigh in terms of skin histology, as both sections appeared normal. There were limited inflammatory infiltrates in both groups. In addition, there were no signs of cellular toxicity or muscular atrophy/degeneration in tissue sections. As expected, the surgical thigh and sham thigh showed regional disruption in the epidermal layer, which was attributed to the formation of scar tissue and wound healing. Overall, there were no signs of toxicity or incompatibility induced by the NG in mice, suggesting excellent biocompatibility of the PDMS-packaged PVDF NG system.
The in vivo biomechanical energy harvesting experiments were then conducted in living rats. An NG with size of 1 cm × 2 cm was implanted between the epithelial and muscle layer in the thigh region of a rat through a 1–3 cm surgical incision (Fig. 3A). Subsequently, the incision was sutured with two electrode leads through the wound. During the measurement, the animal was under anesthesia and its leg with NG was manually deflected. Instantaneous voltage output was obtained upon the motion of the animal's leg, suggesting the quick response of the NG (see video S1). Fig. 3B and C shows the Voc and Isc characterizations of the NG under in vivo condition. The average values of Voc and Isc were found to be 0.26 V and 0.17 µA, respectively. Compared with the in vitro outputs, both Voc and Isc were greatly reduced due to the dramatically restricted deformation amplitude of the PVDF film in the biological environment. However, since the power outputs of the piezoelectric NG are directly proportional to the dimension and deformation scale of the device, significant performance enhancement could be expected when the NG is implanted inside larger body areas such as the human body.
Supplementary material related to this article can be found online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.07.015.
After the initial implantation, the device was left inside the rats for 5 days to examine the long-term durability and performance in an in vivo environment. The Voc was measured repeatedly every day while the rats were housed under normal conditions (Fig. 3D). The peak Voc were determined to be 0.26 ± 0.03 V, 0.20 ± 0.03 V, 0.23 ± 0.02 V, 0.21 ± 0.04 V, 0.23 ± 0.05 V for day 1–5, respectively (Fig. 3E). The stable Voc within the entire experimental period suggested that the NG device could function normally without noticeable decay, despite the constant motion of the animal during the five days. After 5 days of embedment, the PVDF NG was taken out from the rat's body and its piezoelectric output was re-characterized under the same in vitro deflection conditions. No obvious discrepancy was observed from the Voc signals of NG before (black) and after (blue) 5 days of implantation in live rats (Fig. 3F). This comparison confirmed the well preserved functionality of the NG after experiencing long time exposure to the body fluid and tremendous/constant irregular mechanical deformation.
Nevertheless, the desired life time for an implantable NG should be at least multiple years in order to effectively minimize the chance of surgical replacement. Using heart beating as an example, given the typically beating frequency being 60 per minute, 5 years of operation requires ~1.577 × 108 straining actions. In order to evaluate the possible life time of the packaged NG for converting heart motion to electricity within a reasonable time frame, ultrasonic wave was introduced as the vibration source to mimic the straining from heart beating over life time. As schematically shown in Fig. 4A, the entire NG device was immersed in the 0.9% NaCl solution and was subjected to continuous straining in an ultrasonic bath. The ultrasonic source was operating at a frequency of 42 kHz. By considering one strike by the acoustic wave as one straining action to the NG, one hour of ultrasound bath ideally corresponded to 1.512 × 108 straining actions, which was about the same as the number of heart beat in 5 years. It should be noted that this estimation was established without considering the variable displacement scales of ultrasonic wave and human heart beat. The voltage output was measured when the ultrasonic source was turned on and off. Clear voltage output was identified when turning on the ultrasonic equipment. The average peak value of Voc was found to be ~0.2 ± 0.1 V, which was comparable to that of in vivo measurement (Fig. 4B). This relatively small value was a consequence of the limited straining amplitude from ultrasonic wave. After 1 h of continuous operation, the NG was able to produce a more consistent Voc of ~0.18 ± 0.03 V (Fig. 4C). This comparison revealed that the PDMS packaging was highly robust and was able to protect the PVDF NG from bio-fluids under long-term mechanical deformation. The piezoelectric voltage outputs of the NG were further compared before and after the ultrasonic agitation outside of bio-fluids under a mechanical shaker. As shown in Fig. 4D and E, the Voc curves were almost identical before and after the ultrasonic bath, confirming the piezoelectric performance of the packaged PVDF NG were not impaired by long-term straining actions in bio-fluids. This study demonstrated the excellent durability of the PDMS-packaged PVDF NG and endowed practical application potential of this NG system as an implantable power source of biomedical devices.
The efficient and stable electric output promised the PVDF NG in charging or powering small electronics in vivo. To demonstrate this point, an energy storage system comprised of a miniaturized bridge circuit and a ceramic capacitor (1 µF) was packaged (Fig. 5A). As shown in Fig. 5B and C, the NG was implanted following the same procedure as abovementioned implantation experiments. The output leads of the NG was wired through the epithelial and muscle layer in the thigh and back region, and extended out from the back of the rat where the motion is minimized. The energy storage pack was then connected through the leads and fixed on the back of the rat. Upon the movement of the rat's leg, the NG was straining and generating electricity as expected. After the rectification, the alternating current (AC) was converted to direct current (DC) signal without observable loss through the in vivo electricity transport (Fig. 5D). The peak value of Voc after rectification reached about 200 mV, which was similar as the AC signal. This output was converted to a 52 mV DC voltage through a 1 µF capacitor (Fig. 5E), suggesting good potential of using NG to power biomedical electronics in vivo.
4. Conclusion
In summary, we developed an efficient, flexible and robust piezoelectric polymer-based NG system with the capability of harvesting biomechanical energy in living organism. The size, structure and packaging of the NG were designed delicately for adapting the harsh in vivo environment. Due to the optimized device configuration and excellent flexibility of the sponge-like mesoporous PVDF film, the average Voc and Isc of this NG device reached 3.8 V and 3.5 µA, respectively, outperforming a number of reported PVDF-based NGs. By implanting the packaged NG to the quadriceps femoris muscle surface of a rat, a Voc of ~200 mV was generated from the gentle motions of the rat's leg; and this signal exhibited no reduction after 5 days of in vivo operation. Years-long operation of the packaged NG in biological environment was predicted by testing the NG in ultrasonic bio-fluid bath. The electricity produced from animal's leg movement was transported in vivo by buried leads and connected to an energy storage pack located remotely. The generated AC signals were rectified and a DC output of ~52 mV was obtained through a capacitor. This study demonstrated that packaged PVDF NG could be a feasible strategy to serve as implantable powering system with practically long life time.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Research reported in this publication was supported, in part, by the National Institutes of Health (R01EB021336, R01CA169365, P30CA014520, and T32CA009206). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Footnotes
Appendix A. Supporting information
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.07.015.
References
- 1.Wang ZL, Song J. Science. 2006;312:242–246. doi: 10.1126/science.1124005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wang X, Song J, Liu J, Wang ZL. Science. 2007;316:102–105. doi: 10.1126/science.1139366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wang X. Nano Energy. 2012;1:13–24. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hu Y, Wang ZL. Nano Energy. 2015;14:3–14. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cha SN, Seo JS, Kim SM, Kim HJ, Park YJ, Kim SW, Kim JM. Adv. Mater. 2010;22:4726–4730. doi: 10.1002/adma.201001169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hansen BJ, Liu Y, Yang R, Wang ZL. ACS Nano. 2010;4:3647–3652. doi: 10.1021/nn100845b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lee M, Chen CY, Wang S, Cha SN, Park YJ, Kim JM, Chou LJ, Wang ZL. Adv. Mater. 2012;24:1759–1764. doi: 10.1002/adma.201200150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Park KI, Lee M, Liu Y, Moon S, Hwang GT, Zhu G, Kim JE, Kim SO, Kim DK, Wang ZL, Lee KJ. Adv. Mater. 2012;24:2999–3004. doi: 10.1002/adma.201200105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lee J-H, Lee KY, Kumar B, Tien NT, Lee N-E, Kim S-W. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013;6:169–175. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Siddiqui S, Kim D-I, Duy LT, Nguyen MT, Muhammad S, Yoon W-S, Lee N-E. Nano Energy. 2015;15:177–185. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yu Y, Li Z, Wang Y, Gong S, Wang X. Adv. Mater. 2015;27:4938–4944. doi: 10.1002/adma.201502546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhang M, Gao T, Wang J, Liao J, Qiu Y, Yang Q, Xue H, Shi Z, Zhao Y, Xiong Z, Chen L. Nano Energy. 2015;13:298–305. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yu Y, Wang X. Extreme Mech. Lett. 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2016.02.019. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zheng Q, Shi B, Fan F, Wang X, Yan L, Yuan W, Wang S, Liu H, Li Z, Wang ZL. Adv. Mater. 2014;26:5851–5856. doi: 10.1002/adma.201402064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hwang GT, Im D, Lee SE, Lee J, Koo M, Park SY, Kim S, Yang K, Kim SJ, Lee K, Lee KJ. ACS Nano. 2013;7:4545–4553. doi: 10.1021/nn401246y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hwang GT, Kim Y, Lee J-H, Oh S, Jeong CK, Park DY, Ryu J, Kwon HS, Lee S-G, Joung B, Kim D, Lee KJ. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015;8:2677–2684. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Platt SR, Farritor S, Garvin K, Haider H. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 2005;10:455–461. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yang R, Qin Y, Li C, Zhu G, Wang ZL. Nano Lett. 2009;9:1201–1205. doi: 10.1021/nl803904b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Li Z, Zhu G, Yang R, Wang AC, Wang ZL. Adv. Mater. 2010;22:2534–2537. doi: 10.1002/adma.200904355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zurbuchen A, Pfenniger A, Stahel A, Stoeck CT, Vandenberghe S, Koch VM, Vogel R. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2013;41:131–141. doi: 10.1007/s10439-012-0623-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dagdeviren C, Yang BD, Su Y, Tran PL, Joe P, Anderson E, Xia J, Doraiswamy V, Dehdashti B, Feng X, Lu B, Poston R, Khalpey Z, Ghaffari R, Huang Y, Slepian MJ, Rogers JA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2014;111:1927–1932. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317233111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Park KI, Xu S, Liu Y, Hwang GT, Kang SJ, Wang ZL, Lee KJ. Nano Lett. 2010;10:4939–4943. doi: 10.1021/nl102959k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Qi Y, Kim J, Nguyen TD, Lisko B, Purohit PK, McAlpine MC. Nano Lett. 2011;11:1331–1336. doi: 10.1021/nl104412b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ueberschlag P. Sens. Rev. 2001;21:118–126. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Whiter RA, Narayan V, Kar-Narayan S. Adv. Energy Mater. 2014;4:1400519. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lee BS, Park B, Yang HS, Han JW, Choong C, Bae J, Lee K, Yu WR, Jeong U, Chung UI, Park JJ, Kim O. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2014;6:3520–3527. doi: 10.1021/am405684m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Garain S, Sinha TK, Adhikary P, Henkel K, Sen S, Ram S, Sinha C, Schmeisser D, Mandal D. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015;7:1298–1307. doi: 10.1021/am507522r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Alluri NR, Saravanakumar B, Kim SJ. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015;7:9831–9840. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b01760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chen X, Tian H, Li X, Shao J, Ding Y, An N, Zhou Y. Nanoscale. 2015;7:11536–11544. doi: 10.1039/c5nr01746g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lee J-H, Yoon H-J, Kim TY, Gupta MK, Lee JH, Seung W, Ryu H, Kim S-W. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015;25:3203–3209. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chang C, Tran VH, Wang J, Fuh YK, Lin L. Nano Lett. 2010;10:726–731. doi: 10.1021/nl9040719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bae SH, Kahya O, Sharma BK, Kwon J, Cho HJ, Ozyilmaz B, Ahn JH. ACS Nano. 2013;7:3130–3138. doi: 10.1021/nn400848j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Baniasadi M, Huang J, Xu Z, Moreno S, Yang X, Chang J, Quevedo-Lopez MA, Naraghi M, Minary-Jolandan M. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015;7:5358–5366. doi: 10.1021/am508812a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mao Y, Zhao P, McConohy G, Yang H, Tong Y, Wang X. Adv. Energy Mater. 2014;4:130624. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sun C, Shi J, Bayerl DJ, Wang X. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011;4:4508. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lee JH, Lee KY, Gupta MK, Kim TY, Lee DY, Oh J, Ryu C, Yoo WJ, Kang CY, Yoon SJ, Yoo JB, Kim SW. Adv. Mater. 2014;26:765–769. doi: 10.1002/adma.201303570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.