Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 16.
Published in final edited form as: Kidney Int. 2016 Aug 21;90(5):1123–1128. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.06.030

Characterizing Fibrosis in Mouse Kidney using Label Free Fluorescence Lifetime and Second Harmonic Generation Imaging Microscopy in Unilateral Ureteral Obstruction Model

Suman Ranjit 1, Evgenia Dobrinskikh 2, John Montford 2, Alexander Dvornikov 1, Allison Lehman 2, David J Orlicky 3, Raphael Nemenoff 2, Enrico Gratton 1, Moshe Levi 2, Seth Furgeson 2
PMCID: PMC5473685  NIHMSID: NIHMS866453  PMID: 27555119

Abstract

All forms of progressive renal diseases develop a final pathway of tubulointerstitial fibrosis and glomerulosclerosis. Renal fibrosis is usually quantified using histological staining, a process that is time-consuming and pathologist dependent. The work described here shows the development of a fast and operator-independent method to measure fibrosis. To study renal fibrosis, the unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) model was chosen. Mice develop a time-dependent increase in obstructed kidneys; contralateral kidneys are used as controls. After UUO, kidneys were analyzed at three time points: 7 days, 14 days, and 21 days. Fibrosis was investigated using FLIM (Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging) and SHG (Second Harmonic Generation) in the deep tissue imaging microscope called DIVER (Deep Imaging via Enhanced photon Recovery). This microscope was developed for deep tissue and SHG and THG (Third Harmonic Generation) imaging and has extraordinary sensitivity towards harmonic generation. SHG data suggests the presence of more fibrillar collagen in the diseased kidneys. The combinations of short wavelength FLIM and SHG analysis results in a robust analysis procedure independent of observer interpretation and let us create a criterion to quantify the extent of fibrosis directly from the image. The progression of fibrosis in UUO model has been studied using this new FLIM-SHG technique and it shows remarkable improvement in quantification of fibrosis compared to standard histological techniques.

Keywords: Fibrosis, Collagen, SHG, FLIM, Autofluorescence, UUO

Introduction

Pathologically, chronic kidney disease (CKD) is characterized by replacement of normal kidney tissues with extracellular matrix components, including fibrillar collagen (types I and III collagen).1 Given the importance of fibrosis in the progression of CKD, many pre-clinical studies in kidney disease use fibrosis as an endpoint. Quantification of fibrosis is performed using both biochemical and histological techniques.2 These techniques include hydroxyproline measurement, Masson Trichrome stain, Picrosirius Red stain, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for collagen I and III. The histologic studies are limited by batch-to-batch variation in staining as well inter- and intra-observer variability when visual assessment is used to quantify collagen.3,4 Recent data has shown automated analysis of polarized Picrosirius Red images provides accurate and reproducible collagen measurements; however, there is still no “gold-standard” histologic technique to measure kidney fibrosis that performs ideally in all situations.4,5

Second harmonic generation (SHG) and fluorescence imaging have been widely used to measure fibrosis in tissues.67 Fibrillar collagens have a noncentrosymmetric structure and thus can give rise to SHG.6 Previous studies have mainly used the same objective for both excitation and collection of SHG signal (backward generation), which is less sensitive than forward generation.67 The previously described DIVER (Deep tissue Imaging via Enhanced photon Recovery) system uses forward detection and exhibits extraordinary sensitivity to SHG. 8,1012

Fluorescence imaging of fibrotic tissues typically involves extrinsic fluorescent labeling and autofluorescence imaging with a two photon excitation scheme.1314 However, fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIM) for either labeled samples or tissue autofluorescence has never been employed for characterizing fibrosis in kidneys. A phasor approach to FLIM imaging along with SHG generation can quantify fibrosis.1518 The signal originating from SHG and short wavelength fluorescence can be separated based on the lifetime of a signal.19 Fluorescence is a delayed emission and thus has a non-zero lifetime. SHG is a coherent emission, the signal from which resembles the laser pulse and thus has a lifetime of zero. A major benefit of combined SHG FLIM imaging is to simplify the sample preparation and create a ratiometric analysis to obtain fibrosis scores from an image in an automated fashion without any operator intervention.

We hypothesized that label free quantification of fibrosis using SHG FLIM would correlate well with Sirius Red imaging of diseased mouse kidneys after UUO.

Results

To validate SHG and FLIM in a mouse model of renal fibrosis, we chose the widely used unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) model. We used uninjured left kidneys as controls, a strategy that is commonly employed. Picrosirius Red-stained sections of injured and uninjured kidneys were viewed using conventional bright field microscopy and polarized microscopy and showed a time-dependent increase in collagen deposition (Figures 1a–c). Masson Trichrome images of 7-day post-UUO kidneys revealed a doubling of collagen deposition. (Figures 1d–e).

Figure 1. Quantification of Fibrosis Using Histologic Methods.

Figure 1

Figure 1

Picrosirius Red-stained kidneys were visualized under both bright field microscopy and polarized light microscopy (a–c). Figure 1a demonstrates representative 100x images of the same section visualized with both techniques. There is a time-dependent increase in collagen deposition seen using polarized light microscopy (Figures 1b–1c).* p<0.05 vs. control at same time point. Masson Trichrome staining was also performed and revealed tubular damage and collagen deposition (d). 100x representative images are shown. Seven days post-UUO, there are a significant number of dilated tubules (arrowhead) and collagen fibrils (arrow). Quantification of collagen shows a significant increase seven days post-UUO. * p <0.05 vs. control. Scale bar = 25 μm.

The evolution of the SHG signal with time is shown in Figures 2a, 2b and 2c. The plot of the SHG signal as a function of time of UUO is shown in Figure 2e and Supplementary Figure S4. SHG imaging showed an 11-fold increase in collagen content at 21 days post-UUO while Picrosirius Red Staining showed a four-fold increase (Figures 1c and 2e). We next performed 3D SHG imaging in 100 μm thick sections to acquire a more comprehensive view of tissue fibrosis than is seen with 5 μm sections used for histology (Figure 3). These images were reconstructed after background correction and show that there are significantly more collagen fibers localized around the glomerulus for the 21 day (most fibrotic) right kidney (Figure 3a) to the 7 day (least fibrotic) left kidney (Figure 3b).

Figure 2. The evolution of the area covered by SHG signal as a function of days of UUO.

Figure 2

Figures 2a, 2b, 2c show the phasor images of SHG signals generated from mouse kidneys of 7, 14 and 28 days of UUO, respectively. The top two rows (first ten images) in each of these panels show the data acquired for left kidney and the bottom two panels shows the SHG images for the right kidney. The phasor points originating from these measurements are shown in Figure 2d, where the green cursor was used to select the SHG signal appearing at s=0, g=1. Figure 2e shows the progression of the SHG as a function of days of UUO. The black and red in this figure represents the diseased right kidney and normal left kidney, respectively. The filled squares show the mean of the measurement and the boxes show the ± SD of the measurements. The values of individual measurements from the left and right kidney are plotted in dark grey and light red. The trend lines, created using a polynomial fit, show the progression of disease in both the kidneys. The p value of the Student’s T test at each time point of the disease is <0.0001.

Figure 3. 3D image of collagen fibers originating during course of UUO.

Figure 3

3D image from 21 day right kidney, the most fibrotic one (a) and 7 day left kidney, the least fibrotic one (b) are shown. The two images exemplify the different amount of collagen during the progression of the disease. These images were acquired from 100 Nm slices with a 360 Nm FOV for every 2 Nm of depth.

We next quantified fibrosis using a combined SHG and FLIM approach. The rationale behind this approach is that disease progression is associated with accumulation of collagen in the tissue as well as loss of tissue architecture. Fibrillar collagen is primarily responsible for creating the SHG signal and is represented in green in the phasor-masked images. The FLIM images displayed in red are measurements of cells within the kidney. Hence the increase of ratio of fgreen/fred correlates with increasing fibrosis and decreasing renal tissue.

The phasor masked intensity images for the 7, 14 and 21 days of UUO are colored according to the scheme presented in the phasor plot in Figure 4d and the representative images are shown in Figures 4a, 4b and 4c, respectively. The increase of the fgreen/fred ratio with the progression of the disease is shown in Figure 4e. The trend line created by fitting the data with a polynomial shows that this method can help distinguish this difference at a very early stage of the disease, potentially even before 7 days. The ratio of fgreen/fred also increases mildly for the left kidney. This may represent hyperfiltration of the solitary kidney and could reflect a limitation of using contralateral kidneys as controls.

Figure 4. The evolution of the ratio of fgreen/fred as a function of days of UUO.

Figure 4

Figures 4a, 4b, 4c represent the phasor masked images, colored using the cursor colors in the phasor plot of Figure 4d, from mouse kidneys of 7, 14 and 28 days of UUO, respectively. The top two rows (first ten images) in each of these panels show the phasor masked images of the left kidney and the bottom two panels shows the images for the right kidney. THE FOV for each image was 370 Nm. In the phasor plot (Figure 4d), the green cursor were used to select the SHG signal appearing at s=0, g=1; and the red cursor was used to select the short wavelength fluorescence that can bleed through the filter and have a non-zero lifetime. Thus the pixels in the image whose origin is SHG are covered by green and pixels where the origin is bleed-through autofluorescence are covered by red color. Figure 4e shows the progression of the ratio of fraction covered by green to areas covered by red (fgreen/fred) as a function of days of UUO. The black and red in this figure represents the diseased right kidney and normal left kidney, respectively. The filled square shows the mean of the measurement and the box shows the ± SD of the measurements. The values of individual measurements from the left and right kidney are plotted in dark grey and light red. The trend lines, created using a polynomial fit, show the progression of disease in both the kidneys. The p value of the Student’s T test at each time point of the disease is <0.0001.

The fgreen/fred ratio analysis does not involve any operator intervention, as there is no background correction from the intensity histogram. Thus these images can be analyzed in a completely automated way. In Picrosirius Red imaging, compared to the 7-day control kidney the 21-day diseased kidney shows 9 fold increase in signal. In the fgreen/fred method the same signal increase is 20.4 times (Supplementary Figure S1 and S2).

Discussion

In this study, we have found that imaging of fibrotic kidneys using a combined FLIM-SHG approach is a very sensitive indicator of disease progression and fibrosis in the mouse UUO model. Analysis of forward-propagated SHG alone sensitively detects collagen deposition and can be combined with 3D reconstruction in thick tissues to sample a greater area. Furthermore, a novel technique employing both SHG and FLIM was shown to be a sensitive indicator of renal disease progression. Previous studies in other mouse models have evaluated SHG as a technique to measure renal fibrosis but did not compare sensitivity between the techniques.6,7 Our studies focused on the UUO model of renal fibrosis since it is one the most widely-used models of tubulointerstitial fibrosis.

This is the first study to combine FLIM with forward-propagating SHG to measure renal disease progression. Previous fluorescent imaging of kidneys commonly used two-photon excitation which relies on fluorescent intensity. Since FLIM measures the decay rate of the fluorescent signal, it may represent a better and more specific technique to measure tissue autofluorescence.

In summary, we have shown that combined SHG-FLIM imaging is a sensitive and accurate technique to measure the heterogeneous process of tubulointerstitial fibrosis. This can be done in an automated fashion and can quickly provide a thorough evaluation of renal disease progression. Although multiphoton lasers are expensive and not universally available, the decreasing cost of single wavelength femtosecond lasers indicates that this technique could be potenteialy be widely adopted. This technique would likely be used in conjunction with standard histologic techniques and could be modified to measure collagen in an entire kidney as was recently reported.18 Future studies will be needed to determine the applicability of these techniques for live animal imaging as well as quantification in other models of renal fibrosis.

Methods

Details of UUO surgery, slide preparation, histologic studies, FLIM analysis and DIVER setup are available in the supplemental methods.

Analysis of the Second Harmonic Generation and short wavelength fluorescence

The type of measurement that shows the maximum difference between the relatively healthy left kidney and the diseased right kidney over the progression of the UUO was the SHG channel data acquisition, when analyzed without background subtraction. The optical filters used in this channel, combination of BG39 (blue (2) in Figure S1) and UG11 (black (1) in Figure S1), is meant to primarily separate SHG signal (green (4) in Figure S1). In these measurements the samples were excited with 710 nm excitation laser line using a two-photon excitation scheme. The optical filter can pass short wavelength fluorescence from 360 nm to 410 nm (light blue shaded area in between UG11 (black) and BG39 (blue) in Figure S1). To identify the origin of this short wavelength fluorescence signal the average fluorescence spectra of the tissue samples were measured using an Olympus FV1000 microscope equipped with a grating-based spectrograph (Andor SR303i) with a 512-channel ultrafast EMCCD (Andor iXon Ultra). The optical restrictions associated with the Olympus FV1000 microscope set up prohibit measurements below 360 nm.

Supplementary Material

Video S1

Supplementary Figure 1. The transmittance of the filters used in the DIVER microscope and the auto-fluorescence spectra of the kidney. The spectral overlap between the two filters UG11 (black, curve 1) and BG39 (blue, curve 2) was used for the SHG measurements. The overlap (light blue shaded area) between the autofluorescence (red, curve 3) and UG11 (black, curve 1) shows the bleed-through autofluorescence measured while acquiring the SHG signal (green, line 4).

Supplementary Figure 2. (a) Increase in fgreen/fred ratio and (b) area covered by SHG with increasing UUO in the diseased (black) and control (red) kidney with progression of UUO.

Supplementary Figure 3. Representative data for fgreen/fred ratio for the left (red) and right kidney (black) as the disease progresses with time. Figure Panel (a), (b) and (c) represent the ratios for three different animals for 7 days, 14 days, and 28 days of UUO, respectively. The data shows that for ratio increases for the right kidney as a function of time

Supplementary Figure 4. Representative data for number of pixels covered by SHG for the left (red) and right kidney (black) as the disease progresses with time. Figure Panel (a), (b) and (c) represent the area covered for different animals of 7 days, 14 days, and 28 days of UUO. The data shows that amount of area covered by SHG increases for the right kidney as a function of time representing the fact that there is a increase in collagen I content with increase in UUO.

Supplementary Figure 5. The DIVER microscope set up. The excitation light from the MaiTai DeepSee Ti:Sa laser passes through AOM to adjust the power. A XY-scanner and Olympus LCPlanFl 20x air objective are used for imaging. The fluorescence and SHG photons pass through a filter in the wheel and the BG39 filters that form input/output windows in the chamber filled with the index matching liquid (inset). BG-39 filters prevent the excitation laser light from going to PMT photocathode. The data were collected using the FLIMbox.

Supplementary Figure 6. Effect of the intensity histogram correction. Changing the background correction from 0.03 counts/pixel to 0.4 counts/pixel (Figures a and b) changes the phasor plot from Figure S6.c to S6.d and the phasor mapped image from Figure S6.e to S6.f. The red and green cursors were used to select fluorescence and SHG signals, respectively.

Supplementary Video S1. The supplementary video shows how the collagen in each layer accumulates to give the 3D structure of collagen in UUO tissue samples. It demonstrates the power of DIVER to do these measurements. 50 Z- slices with a 2 μm Z difference and 360 μm field of view was used to make this 3D reconstruction.

Download video file (1.5MB, mp4)

Acknowledgments

Source of support: NIH P50 GM076516 and NIH P41 GM103540 to E.G.; NIH K08 HL103774 to S. F.; NIH P30CA046934 to R.N.; VAMR 1I01BX001954 and NIH 1R01DK098336 to M.L.

The authors would like to acknowledge Milka Stakic for technical assistance with the experiments. We also acknowledge the UCD Research Histology Shared Resource for assistance with slide preparation and histologic studies. Portions of this work were presented at the Experimental Biology meeting in Boston (2015) as well as the American Society of Nephrology annual meeting in San Diego (2015).

Footnotes

DISCLOSURE

All the authors declared no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Duffield JS. Cellular and molecular mechanisms in kidney fibrosis. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:2299–2306. doi: 10.1172/JCI72267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hewitson TD, Smith ER, Samuel CS. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of fibrosis in the kidney. Nephrology (Carlton) 2014;19:721–726. doi: 10.1111/nep.12321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Furness PN, Taub N Convergence of European Renal Transplant Pathology Assessment Procedures P. International variation in the interpretation of renal transplant biopsies: report of the CERTPAP Project. Kidney Int. 2001;60:1998–2012. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.00030.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Farris AB, Adams CD, Brousaides N, Della Pelle PA, et al. Morphometric and visual evaluation of fibrosis in renal biopsies. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22:176–186. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2009091005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Street JM, Souza AC, Alvarez-Prats A, Horino T, et al. Automated quantification of renal fibrosis with Sirius Red and polarization contrast microscopy. Physiological reports. 2014:2. doi: 10.14814/phy2.12088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Strupler M, Hernest M, Fligny C, Martin JL, et al. Second harmonic microscopy to quantify renal interstitial fibrosis and arterial remodeling. J Biomed Opt. 2008;13:054041. doi: 10.1117/1.2981830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Strupler M, Pena AM, Hernest M, Tharaux PL, et al. Second harmonic imaging and scoring of collagen in fibrotic tissues. Optics express. 2007;15:4054–4065. doi: 10.1364/oe.15.004054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Peng Q, Zhuo S, So PTC, Yu H. Improving liver fibrosis diagnosis based on forward and backward second harmonic generation signals. Applied Physics Letters. 2015;106:083701. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Stanciu SG, Xu S, Peng Q, Yan J, et al. Experimenting liver fibrosis diagnostic by two photon excitation microscopy and Bag-of-Features image classification. Sci Rep. 2014;4:4636. doi: 10.1038/srep04636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Crosignani V, Jahid S, Dvornikov AS, Gratton E. A deep tissue fluorescence imaging system with enhanced SHG detection capabilities. Microsc Res Tech. 2014;77:368–373. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Crosignani V, Dvornikov A, Aguilar JS, Stringari C, et al. Deep tissue fluorescence imaging and in vivo biological applications. J Biomed Opt. 2012;17:116023. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.17.11.116023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Crosignani V, Dvornikov AS, Gratton E. Enhancement of imaging depth in turbid media using a wide area detector. J Biophotonics. 2011;4:592–599. doi: 10.1002/jbio.201100001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ashworth SL, Sandoval RM, Tanner GA, Molitoris BA. Two-photon microscopy: visualization of kidney dynamics. Kidney Int. 2007;72:416–421. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Small DM, Sanchez WY, Roy S, Hickey MJ, et al. Multiphoton fluorescence microscopy of the live kidney in health and disease. J Biomed Opt. 2014;19:020901. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.19.2.020901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Stefl M, James NG, Ross JA, Jameson DM. Applications of phasors to in vitro timeresolved fluorescence measurements. Anal Biochem. 2011;410:62–69. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2010.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Arnesano C, Santoro Y, Gratton E. Digital parallel frequency-domain spectroscopy for tissue imaging. J Biomed Opt. 2012;17:96014–96011. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.17.9.096014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Digman MA, Caiolfa VR, Zamai M, Gratton E. The phasor approach to fluorescence lifetime imaging analysis. Biophys J. 2008;94:L14–16. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.120154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Redford GI, Clegg RM. Polar plot representation for frequency-domain analysis of fluorescence lifetimes. J Fluoresc. 2005;15:805–815. doi: 10.1007/s10895-005-2990-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ranjit S, Dvornikov A, Stakic M, Hong SH, et al. Imaging Fibrosis and Separating Collagens using Second Harmonic Generation and Phasor Approach to Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging. Sci Rep. 2015;5:13378. doi: 10.1038/srep13378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Torres R, Velazquez H, Chang JJ, Levene MJ, et al. Three-Dimensional Morphology by Multiphoton Microscopy with Clearing in a Model of Cisplatin-Induced CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 doi: 10.1681/ASN.2015010079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Video S1

Supplementary Figure 1. The transmittance of the filters used in the DIVER microscope and the auto-fluorescence spectra of the kidney. The spectral overlap between the two filters UG11 (black, curve 1) and BG39 (blue, curve 2) was used for the SHG measurements. The overlap (light blue shaded area) between the autofluorescence (red, curve 3) and UG11 (black, curve 1) shows the bleed-through autofluorescence measured while acquiring the SHG signal (green, line 4).

Supplementary Figure 2. (a) Increase in fgreen/fred ratio and (b) area covered by SHG with increasing UUO in the diseased (black) and control (red) kidney with progression of UUO.

Supplementary Figure 3. Representative data for fgreen/fred ratio for the left (red) and right kidney (black) as the disease progresses with time. Figure Panel (a), (b) and (c) represent the ratios for three different animals for 7 days, 14 days, and 28 days of UUO, respectively. The data shows that for ratio increases for the right kidney as a function of time

Supplementary Figure 4. Representative data for number of pixels covered by SHG for the left (red) and right kidney (black) as the disease progresses with time. Figure Panel (a), (b) and (c) represent the area covered for different animals of 7 days, 14 days, and 28 days of UUO. The data shows that amount of area covered by SHG increases for the right kidney as a function of time representing the fact that there is a increase in collagen I content with increase in UUO.

Supplementary Figure 5. The DIVER microscope set up. The excitation light from the MaiTai DeepSee Ti:Sa laser passes through AOM to adjust the power. A XY-scanner and Olympus LCPlanFl 20x air objective are used for imaging. The fluorescence and SHG photons pass through a filter in the wheel and the BG39 filters that form input/output windows in the chamber filled with the index matching liquid (inset). BG-39 filters prevent the excitation laser light from going to PMT photocathode. The data were collected using the FLIMbox.

Supplementary Figure 6. Effect of the intensity histogram correction. Changing the background correction from 0.03 counts/pixel to 0.4 counts/pixel (Figures a and b) changes the phasor plot from Figure S6.c to S6.d and the phasor mapped image from Figure S6.e to S6.f. The red and green cursors were used to select fluorescence and SHG signals, respectively.

Supplementary Video S1. The supplementary video shows how the collagen in each layer accumulates to give the 3D structure of collagen in UUO tissue samples. It demonstrates the power of DIVER to do these measurements. 50 Z- slices with a 2 μm Z difference and 360 μm field of view was used to make this 3D reconstruction.

Download video file (1.5MB, mp4)

RESOURCES