Abstract
Benzyne was developed as a reducing agent in the key step of converting amino sugars and ketoses into deoxy sugars, which occur widely in natural products. Many deoxy sugars exhibit antibiotic and anticancer activities, and furthermore, they play essential biological roles. By treatment with CS2 and then Ac2O, amino sugars and ketoses were converted into the corresponding 1,3‐thiazolidine‐2‐thiones. In the key step, these intermediates were treated with 2‐trimethylsilylphenyl triflate (2.0 equiv.) and CsF (3.0 equiv.) in MeCN at 25 °C to produce acyclic enol acetates in 60–63 % yields. Saponification of the enol acetates with NaOMe/MeOH followed by intramolecular cyclization afforded the target 2‐deoxy sugars. The key step of the reductive deamination involved a domino 1,2‐elimination/[3+2]‐cycloaddition/retro [3+2]‐ring‐opening sequence. The generality of this new method was proven by the use of various substrates, including pentoses, hexoses, monosaccharides, disaccharides, aldoses, and ketoses.
Keywords: benzyne, deamination, deoxy sugars, domino reactions, reduction
Deamination, the removal of an amine group from a molecule, plays an important role in chemical transformations and biological systems.1 Chemical reagents developed for this purpose2 include copper(II) halides along with alkyl nitrites;3 HCO2H/acetic anhydride (Ac2O) followed by POCl3/Et3N and then tributyltin hydride;4 hydrogen peroxide along with tetrabutylammonium iodide as the catalyst;5 isopropyl N,N‐difluorocarbamate;6 nitrosyl acetate;7 nitrosyl tetrafluoroborate;8, 9 p‐nitrophenyl formate, Ac2O, POCl3/Et3N, and tributyltin hydride in sequence;10 samarium iodide;11 sodium borohydride along with 2,3,5,6‐tetraphenylpyrylium tetrafluoroborate;12 sodium nitrite;13 and zinc dichromate trihydrate.14 Deamination of amino acids and proteins can proceed through an oxidative process2 by using molecular oxygen in the presence of a d‐amino acid oxidase, lysine cyclodeaminase, l‐lysine oxidase, pyridoxal phosphate cofactor,15 and so forth. Deamination of DNA bases by nitrous anhydride (N2O3)16 can occur spontaneously to generate uracil, hypoxanthine, and xanthine.
It was our plan to apply a domino sequence for the deamination of compounds in the synthesis of deoxy sugars under mild and neutral conditions. Deoxy sugars constitute an important class of carbohydrates that occur widely in natural products. Prominent examples include 2‐deoxy‐d‐erythro‐pentoses in DNA and deoxyhexoses in antibiotics and anticancer agents such as anthracyclines, angucyclines, aureolic acid, cardiac glycosides, macrolides, and pluramycins.17 Moreover, the deoxy sugar components in different drugs are essential for their pharmacology and biological activities.18 As found in lipopolysaccharides, glycoproteins, and glycolipids, a wide variety of deoxy sugars therein play versatile biological roles. Furthermore, some 2,6‐dideoxy sugars have been found in antibiotics isolated from Streptomyces spp. and in cardiac glycosides isolated from plant sources.18 Other prominent examples include chromomycin A3 (1; Figure 1),19 which is an antitumor drug produced by Streptomyces griseus subsp. griseus. Landomycin A (2; Figure 1),20 isolated from a culture broth of Streptomyces cyanogenus, is an antibiotic. Both representative examples contain a β‐d‐olivose unit. Chromomycin A3 (1) also contains a β‐d‐oliose unit.
Figure 1.

Structures of compounds 1 and 2.
Some reagents are used to perform “oxidative deamination” for the conversion of an amino group into a carbonyl group. Representative examples include hydrogen peroxide, molecular oxygen, nitrous anhydride, nitrosyl tetrafluoroborate, pyridoxal phosphate, and zinc dichromate trihydrate.2 Close scrutiny of the literature reveals that only a limited number of reagents are used to accomplish “reductive deamination.” Reagents for this type of reaction include isopropyl N,N‐difluorocarbamate,6 samarium iodide,11 and sodium borohydride.12
The reactive benzyne species21 is considered by us as an ideal candidate for reductive deamination for two reasons. First, it can be generated through fluoride displacement in 2‐silylphenyl triflate under mild conditions.22 Second, it was previously successfully applied in the reductive deoxygenation of carbohydrates23 and in reductive insertion into the S=O bond of DMSO, as reported by Chen et al.24 As an oxidized form of benzene, benzyne was postulated to be able to act further as a “reducing agent” to remove a nitrogen atom from organic substrates.
Herein, we report our findings on the feasibility and generality of using benzyne in the reductive deamination reaction. This domino reaction was successfully applied in the synthesis of deoxy sugars from amino sugars and ketoses.
The synthetic methods used for the conversion of sugars into deoxy sugars often involve reductive removal of the oxygen atom of the hydroxy group by substitution of the corresponding sulfonates with a hydride25 or an alkyl group.26 The Barton method involving the use of S‐methyl dithiocarbonates with tributyltin hydride offers an alternative and efficient route.27, 28 Moreover, the Fischer–Zach reaction allows the conversion of glycosyl halides into glycals with zinc dust in acetic acid. These unsaturated sugars may undergo electrophilic addition at the C2 position to give 2‐deoxy sugars.29, 30 Alternatively, biosynthetic transformations with the aid of enzymes can also deoxygenate sugars.31 Serving as the starting materials in this newly developed transformation, amino sugars are popular compounds. They occur widely in nature and are found in a great variety of polysaccharides, glycolipids, mucoproteins, nucleotides, teichoic acids, and antibiotics.32 Moreover, many amino sugars are commercially available.
The strategy shown in Scheme 1 accounts for our design of a new “reductive deamination” reaction that can be applied to the synthesis of deoxy sugars from amino sugars. It involves the conversion of amino sugars 3 into thiazolidine‐2‐thiones 4 with carbon disulfide. Then, benzyne is used to “extract” the −N(C=S)S− moiety in 4 to give enol acetates 5 and 2‐imino‐l,3‐benzodithiole 6 as a byproduct. Finally, removal of the acetyl groups followed by cyclization provides desired deoxyaldoses 7. Overall, the nitrogen atom attached to the C2 atom of 8 is expelled, a double bond is formed between C1 and C2, and the endocyclic O−C bond is cleaved and then regenerated.
Scheme 1.

Strategy for the deamination of amino sugars by benzyne.
As proof for the feasibility of the new reductive deamination strategy, an example was put into practice. Conversion of commercially available (+)‐d‐galactosamine hydrochloride (9) into benzylamine aldose 11 via intermediates 10 a and 10 b involved formation of a Schiff base with benzaldehyde, protection of the hydroxy groups with Ac2O, reduction of the Schiff base with NaBH3CN, and selective deprotection of the anomeric acetate with NH3 (see Scheme 2). Then, aminoaldose 11 was treated with CS2 in THF for 12 h and then with Ac2O in pyridine (Py) to produce 1,3‐thiazolidine‐2‐thione 12 in 72 % yield. Isolated thione 12 was then mixed with 2‐silylphenyl triflate (13, 2.0 equiv.) and CsF (3.0 equiv.) in MeCN at 25 °C for 60 min. Acyclic enol acetate 14 was isolated in 63 % yield, and it was treated with NaOMe in MeOH. Accordingly, desired (+)‐d‐2‐deoxygalactose (15) was generated in almost quantitative yield. In the entire transformation of 9 → 15, the nitrogen atom attached to the C2 carbon of galactosamine (9) was expelled.
Scheme 2.

Detailed procedure for the reductive deamination of galactosamine hydrochloride (9).
Many conditions were examined to optimize the yield of the benzyne‐induced deamination reaction for the conversion of 2‐thione 12 into enol acetate 14. Different kinds of fluoride sources (Bu4NF, KF, and CsF) with various equivalents (2.0–3.0), solvents (MeCN, Et2O, and THF), temperatures (0–80 °C), and reaction times (0.50–8.0 h) were tested. The best combination involved the use of CsF (3.0 equiv.) with triflate 13 (2.0 equiv.) in MeCN at 25 °C for 1.0 h. In Table 1, five examples of the same transformation as that displayed in Scheme 1 are listed. Their key steps are the benzyne‐induced deaminative olefination, including the conversions of 12→14, 18→19, 22→23, 26→27, and 31→32. Protection of the OH groups in the form of an acetal (e.g. 22), acetate (e.g. 12 and 26), benzyl (Bn) ether (e.g. 18), and p‐methoxybenzyl ether (e.g. 18) allowed formation of the deaminated products in good yields⋅33 In the entire transformations, the reaction conditions were mild enough to prevent undesired isomerization from occurring at carbon centers of the sugars.
Table 1.
Intermediates and yields for the conversion of 2‐amino sugars into 2‐deoxyaldoses.
|
α‐Hydroxy imines (e.g. 35), prepared from 2‐ketoses (e.g. 34) and primary amines, can undergo the Heyns rearrangement34 to produce stable α‐amino aldehydes (e.g. 36). Their cyclic hexopyranose forms (e.g. 37) belong to the class of 2‐amino sugars, which were applied successfully as starting materials in the synthesis of a 2‐deoxy sugars. A representative example is shown in Scheme 3; the key intermediates, products, and yields of more examples are listed in Table 2. These results indicate that the reductive deamination reaction could be successfully extended to the conversion of 2‐ketoses into 2‐deoxy sugars with a complex disaccharide structure, such as isomaltulose (47) and lactulose (52).
Scheme 3.

Conversion of ketose 34 into deoxyglucose 20 via 2‐aminoaldose 36, and the mechanism for the deamination key step.
Table 2.
Intermediates and yields in the conversion of 2‐ketoses into 2‐deoxyaldoses via 2‐amino sugars.
|
A cogent mechanism for the newly developed reductive deamination by use of benzyne is depicted in Scheme 3. The addition of amino aldehyde 36 to carbon disulfide followed by Ac2O (38) gives 1,3‐thiazolidine‐2‐thione 39. Then, its −C(=S)S− moiety adds onto benzyne, generated in situ by 1,2‐elimination of 2‐silylphenyl triflate (13) with CsF, through a [3+2]‐cycloaddition mode to give cyclic ylide 40. Subsequently, a retro [3+2] reaction takes place to afford ring‐opened enol acetate 41 as the desired product and 2‐imino‐l,3‐benzodithiole (6) as a byproduct.
After the conversion of 2‐thione 39 into enol acetate 41, the oxidation state of the C2‐NBn carbon atom of 39 decreases and that of the sp carbon atoms of benzyne increases. Thus, benzyne is oxidized and acts as a reducing agent; moreover, thione 39 loses an amino group. Therefore, the benzyne species functions as a reductive deamination agent.
In addition to the −C(=S)S− moiety, the possibility exists for the −C(=S)N− moiety in 2‐thione 39 to react with benzyne. Nevertheless, both pathways would lead to the same enol acetate, 41, as the desired product.
Saponification of the enol acetates listed in Tables 1 and 2 with sodium methoxide in methanol gave the corresponding 2‐dexoy aldoses in excellent yields. Taking all of the steps into account, both 2‐amino sugars and 2‐ketoses underwent domino deamination as the key step to give deoxy aldoses as the final products.
In conclusion, active benzyne generated in situ was developed as a reducing reagent for deamination. This method was applied successfully as the key step in the synthesis of deoxy sugars in an optically active form from 2‐amino sugars and 2‐ketoses. The reaction conditions were compatible with O‐glycosides, acetals, the acetyl group, the enol acetate functionality, and the benzyl group. Except for the C1 and C2 atoms, all of the remaining stereogenic centers in the carbohydrate starting materials retained their original configurations.
This new reductive deamination method proceeds through a domino reaction involving 1,2‐elimination to form benzyne, a [3+2]‐cycloaddition reaction between benzyne and a 1,3‐thiazolidine‐2‐thione, and a retro [3+2]‐ring‐opening reaction of an ylide to afford an enol acetate. This protocol provides two new avenues to optically active deoxy sugars under mild conditions. In the near future, more benzyne‐induced reactions proceeding in a domino fashion will be developed for the efficient synthesis of various types of functional compounds.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supporting information
As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.
Supplementary
Acknowledgements
For financial support, we thank the Ministry of Science and Technology (grant No. NSC 99–2113‐M‐007–008‐MY3) and the Ministry of Education of R.O.C. (grant Nos. 102N2011E1 and 102N2018E1).
J. R. Hwu, D. B. Chandrasekhar, K. C. Hwang, C.-C. Lin, J.-C. Horng, F.-K. Shieh, ChemistryOpen 2017, 6, 331.
References
- 1. Levy M. in Encyclopedia of Astrobiology (Eds.: M. Gargaud, R. Amils, J. C. Quintanilla, H. J. Cleaves II, W. M. Irvine, D. L. Pinti, M. Viso), Springer, Heidelberg, 2011, pp. 410. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Turner N. J., Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 4073–4087, and references cited therein. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Doyle M. P., Siegfried B., J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1976, 433–434. [Google Scholar]
- 4. Trumtel M., Tavecchia P., Veyrières A., Sinay P., Carbohydr. Res. 1989, 191, 29–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Gong J.-L., Qi X., Wei D., Feng J.-B., Wu X.-F., Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014, 12, 7486–7488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Klopotek D. L., Hobrock B. G., Kovacic P., Jones M. B., J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 1665–1667. [Google Scholar]
- 7. Schreiner E., Zbiral E., Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1990, 581–586. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Navuluri C., Crich D., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 11339–11342; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2013, 125, 11549–11552. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Buda S., Crich D., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1084–1092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Barton D. H. R., Bringmann G., Lamotte G., Motherwell W. B., Motherwell R. S. H., Porter A. E. A., J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1980, 2657–2664. [Google Scholar]
- 11. Honda T., Ishikawa F., Chem. Commun. 1999, 12, 1065–1066. [Google Scholar]
- 12. Katritzky A. R., Horvath K., Plau B., J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1980, 2554–2560. [Google Scholar]
- 13.For related work, see:
- 13a. Bera B. C., Foster A. B., Stacey M., J. Chem. Soc. 1956, 4531–4535; [Google Scholar]
- 13b. Llewellyn J. W., Williams J. M., J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1973, 1997–2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Sobhani S., Maleki M. F., Synlett 2010, 3, 383–386. [Google Scholar]
- 15. Ebadi M., Neurochem. Int. 1981, 3, 181–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Kow Y. W., Free Radical Biol. Med. 2002, 33, 886–893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Hou D., Lowary T. L., Carbohydr. Res. 2009, 344, 1911–1940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Johnson D. A., Liu H.-W. in Comprehensive Natural Products Chemistry Vol. 3 (Eds.: O. Meth-Cohn, D. Barton, K. Nakanishi), Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1999, pp. 311–313. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Menéndez N., Nur-e-Alam M., Fischer C., Braña A. F., Salas J. A., Rohr J., Méndez C., Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 167–177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Yang X., Wang P., Yu B., Chem. Rec. 2013, 13, 70–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.For recent reviews, see:
- 21a. Tadross P. M., Stoltz B. M., Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 3550–3577; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21b. Bhunia A., Yetra S. R., Biju A. T., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 3140–3152; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21c. Pellissier H., Santelli M., Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 701–730. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Himeshima Y., Sonoda T., Kobayashi H., Chem. Lett. 1983, 12, 1211–1214. [Google Scholar]
- 23. Hsu Y. C., Hwu J. R., Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 7686–7690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Liu F.-L., Chen J.-R., Zou Y.-Q., Wei Q., Xiao W.-J., Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 3768–3771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Stewart A. J., Evans R. M., Weymouth-Wilson A. C., Cowley A. R., Watkinc D. J., Fleet G. W. J., Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2002, 13, 2667–2672. [Google Scholar]
- 26. Jones N. A., Jenkinson S. F., Soengas R., Fanefjord M., Wormald M. R., Dwek R. A., Kiran G. P., Devendar R., Takata G., Morimoto K., Izumori K., Fleet G. W. J., Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2007, 18, 774–786. [Google Scholar]
- 27. Barton D. H. R., McCombie S. W., J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1975, 1574–1585. [Google Scholar]
- 28. Forbes J. E., Zard S. Z., Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 4367–4370. [Google Scholar]
- 29.For a book, see: Brito-Arias M., Synthesis and Characterization of Glycosides, Springer, New York, 2006, pp. 98–99. [Google Scholar]
- 30. Fischer E., Zach K., Sitz. Ber. Kgl. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. 1913, 16, 311. [Google Scholar]
- 31. Yoshihara A., Haraguchi S., Gullapalli P., Rao D., Morimoto K., Takata G., Jones N., Jenkinson S. F., Wormald M. R., Dwek R. A., Fleet G. W. J., Izumori K., Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2008, 19, 739–745. [Google Scholar]
- 32. Elshahawi S. I., Shaaban K. A., Kharel M. K., Thorson J. S., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 7591–7697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Hwu J. R., Chang-Hsu Y., Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 4727–4731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Wang Z., Comprehensive Organic Name Reactions and Reagents, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2010, pp. 1403–1407. [Google Scholar]
- 35. Carson F. J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1956, 78, 3728–3731. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.
Supplementary
