Erratum to: Social capital—a mixed blessing for women? A cross-sectional study of different forms of social relations and self-rated depression in Moscow

Erratum

After publication of the original article [1], the author reported an error to the columns depicting the results for “Women (n = 678)” in Table 2. The correct version of Table 2 is included in this erratum.

Table 2.

Depression among respondents aged 18 and over in Moscow

Variables	Men (n = 507)				Women (n = 678)
	Model 1		Model 2		Model 1		Model 2
	OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI
Age	1.00	0.99–1.01	0.99	0.98–1.00	1.00	0.99–1.01	1.00	0.99–1.01
Educational level
High	1.00		1.00		1.00		1.00
Medium	0.89	0.58–1.36	0.78	0.49–1.22	0.91	0.64–1.29	0.85	0.59–1.22
Low	1.04	0.66–1.65	1.02	0.63–1.65	0.75	0.50–1.12	0.74	0.49–1.12
Economic problems
Few	1.00		1.00		1.00		1.00
Many	2.34	1.57–3.51***	2.49	1.65–3.78***	1.48	1.09–2.01*	1.52	1.11–2.07**
Family relations
Marital status
Married/cohabiting	1.00		1.00		1.00		1.00
Divorced/widowed	1.20	0.70–2.07	1.13	0.64–1.98	1.48	1.02–2.14*	1.49	1.03–2.17*
Never married	1.03	0.60–1.76	1.10	0.62–1.95	0.96	0.59–1.56	0.94	0.56–1.55
Contact with relatives
Regular	1.00		1.00		1.00		1.00
Little	1.62	1.10–2.39*	1.51	1.00–2.30	1.45	1.06–1.98*	1.57	1.10–2.24*
Extra-familial relations
Contact with friends/acquaintances
Regular	1.00		1.00		1.00		1.00
Little	1.63	1.08–2.45*	1.44	0.93–2.25	1.12	0.81–1.55	0.97	0.67–1.40
Age-bridging contacts
Regular	1.00		1.00		1.00		1.00
Little	0.99	0.67–1.47	0.88	0.58–1.33	0.72	0.52–0.98*	0.72	0.51–1.00*
Voluntary associations
Member	1.00		1.00		1.00		1.00
Non-member	1.07	0.70–1.63	1.07	0.68–1.68	0.96	0.66–1.40	1.04	0.70–1.54

Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) estimated from binary logistic regression. Model 1: age adjusted; Model 2: mutually adjusted

NOTE: Standardised according to the educational-level proportions of the Moscow City population given in the 2002 census for the population over 18 years

^* p < 0.05 ^** p < 0.005 ^*** p < 0.001