Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cardiol. 2017 Mar 24;240:87–89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.03.102

Acute stress disorder symptoms after evaluation for acute coronary syndrome predict 30-day readmission

Jennifer A Sumner 1,*, Ian M Kronish 2, Bernard P Chang 3, Ying Wei 4, Joseph E Schwartz 5, Donald Edmondson 6
PMCID: PMC5475403  NIHMSID: NIHMS864978  PMID: 28377184

Abstract

Background

Thirty-day readmissions are a major concern for hospitals. Even though numerous readmission risk prediction models have been developed, their performance has been modest, and few predictors are modifiable. Stress is a modifiable factor that may increase risk of adverse post-hospitalization outcomes. We examined whether posttraumatic stress days after evaluation for acute coronary syndrome (ACS)—termed acute stress disorder (ASD) symptoms—was associated with 30-day all-cause emergency department (ED) and hospital readmission.

Methods

Participants were enrolled in the REactions to Acute Care and Hospitalization (REACH) study during ED evaluation for ACS. During inpatient stay or by phone after discharge, participants reported ASD symptoms in response to the event that brought them to the ED. ED or hospital readmissions within 30 days of discharge were determined by research nurse record review. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between ASD symptoms and 30-day ED/hospital readmission.

Results

In the analytic sample of 974 individuals, there were 123 ED/hospital readmissions within 30 days of discharge. A 10-point ASD symptom increase was significantly associated with increased 30-day readmission risk in an unadjusted model [odds ratio (OR)=1.32, p=.001] and a model adjusted for demographics, clinical characteristics, and ACS discharge diagnosis (OR=1.24, p=.03).

Conclusions

Posttraumatic stress shortly after acute coronary syndrome evaluation may help to understand vulnerability for readmission.

Keywords: Readmission, posttraumatic stress, acute stress disorder, acute coronary syndrome

Introduction

Both costly and common, 30-day readmissions are a major concern for hospitals. Numerous readmission risk prediction models have been developed, but their performance has been modest, and, importantly, few predictors are modifiable [1], [2]. Potentially life-threatening medical events that prompt patients’ index hospitalizations, along with experiences during hospitalization, can trigger psychological stress, including posttraumatic stress reactions [3]. Stress is a modifiable factor that may increase risk of adverse post-hospitalization outcomes. We examined whether posttraumatic stress days after evaluation for acute coronary syndrome (ACS)—termed acute stress disorder (ASD) symptoms—was associated with 30-day all-cause emergency department (ED) and hospital readmission.

Methods

The REactions to Acute Care and Hospitalization (REACH) study [3,4] is an observational cohort of patients enrolled during ED evaluation for ACS at New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, a large urban hospital in Northern Manhattan. English- and Spanish-speaking patients with a provisional diagnosis of “probable ACS” were eligible. During inpatient stay or by phone after discharge (median 3 days after enrollment), participants reported ASD symptoms (i.e., early posttraumatic stress symptoms: re-experiencing and/or avoiding reminders of the trauma, hyperarousal) in response to the event that brought them to the ED using 14 items from the Acute Stress Disorder Scale (ASDS; total score range=14-70) [5]. ASDS total scores ≥28 suggest probable ASD [5]. ED or hospital readmissions within 30 days of discharge were identified by contacting patients and proactively searching electronic health records, and were confirmed by research nurse record review. Columbia University Medical Center’s Institutional Review Board approved this research, and the study protocol conforms to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided written informed consent.

Logistic regression was used to determine the association between ASD symptoms and 30-day ED/hospital readmission with and without adjustment for demographics, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) index for mortality risk [6], Charlson comorbidity index [7], history of coronary artery disease, discharge diagnosis (ACS; non-ACS, cardiac; non-cardiac), and Patient Health Questionnaire-8 depression screen [8]. Missing data were imputed for total scores if <50% of items were missing. Analyses were conducted using R Statistical Software.

Results

From November 2013 to February 2016, 1,000 patients were enrolled in the REACH study (61% of those eligible). Participants who were readmitted before ASD assessment (n=22) or died within 30 days of discharge (n=4) were excluded from analysis, resulting in an analytic sample of 974 individuals. Participant characteristics are shown in Table 1. Mean ASDS score was 24.39 (standard deviation=10.49). Thirty percent of participants screened positive for probable ASD, 32.0% were confirmed ACS at discharge, and 12.6% had a 30-day ED/hospital readmission.

Table 1.

Participant characteristics for the full sample and according to 30-day ED/hospital readmission status.

Variable Full Sample (N=974) 30-day Readmission (n=123) No 30-day Readmission (n=851)

No. (%) or Mean (SD) No. (%) or Mean (SD) No. (%) or Mean (SD) Pa
Demographics
 Age 60.89 (13.15) 60.03 (11.95) 61.01 (13.32) .40
 Female 445 (45.7%) 52 (42.3%) 393 (46.2%) .42
 Race .07
  non-Hispanic White 160 (16.8%) 12 (9.8%) 148 (17.9%)
  non-Hispanic Black 197 (20.7%) 33 (26.8%) 164 (19.8%)
  non-Hispanic Other 64 (6.7%) 10 (8.1%) 54 (6.5%)
  Hispanic 529 (55.7%) 68 (55.3%) 461 (55.7%)
Diagnosis at discharge .26
 Non-cardiac diagnosis (e.g., musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal) 562 (57.7%) 63 (51.2%) 499 (58.6%)
 Non-ACS, cardiac diagnosis (e.g., atrial fibrillation, hypertensive urgency) 100 (10.3%) 16 (13.0%) 84 (9.9%)
 ACS 312 (32.0%) 44 (35.8%) 268 (31.5%)
ASD measures
 ASD symptom scoreb 24.39 (10.49) 27.44 (12.41) 23.96 (10.13) .005
 Probable ASDc 275 (30.0%) 49 (43.0%) 226 (28.2%) .001
Covariates
 GRACE index 155.82 (43.51) 156.36 (42.35) 155.75 (43.71) .88
 Charlson comorbidity index 16.64 (4.14) 16.66 (5.18) 16.64 (3.98) .96
 History of CAD 307 (31.5%) 50 (40.7%) 257 (30.2%) .02
 Depressiond 244 (26.6%) 43 (37.7%) 201 (25.0%) .004

Note. ED=emergency department. ACS=acute coronary syndrome. ASD=acute stress disorder. GRACE index= Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events index. CAD=coronary artery disease. Bold=P<.05.

a

P-value is for the comparison of participants with and without a 30-day ED/hospital readmission.

b

ASD symptom severity total score.

c

Probable ASD defined as an ASD symptom score ≥28.

d

Depression defined as a Patient Health Questionnaire-8 total score >10.

A 10-point ASD symptom increase (which corresponds to an increase of approximately 1 standard deviation) was significantly associated with increased 30-day readmission risk in the unadjusted model, odds ratio (OR)=1.32 (95% CI, 1.12-1.56), and adjusted model, OR=1.24 (95% CI, 1.02-1.51) (Table 2). Unadjusted and adjusted model results were based on sample sizes of 916 and 869, respectively, due to observations being deleted because of missingness on some variables. Results were consistent when using the dichotomous probable ASD variable: unadjusted OR=1.92 (95% CI, 1.29-2.87), P=.001, n=916; adjusted OR=1.65 (95% CI, 1.04-2.63), P=.04, n=869. ACS discharge diagnosis was not significantly associated with readmission. Model estimates were similar in sensitivity analyses in patients with (n=312) and without (n=662) confirmed ACS at discharge [ACS: unadjusted OR=1.50 (95% CI, 1.12-2.03), P=.008, n=302; adjusted OR=1.29 (95% CI, 0.91-1.81), P=.15, n=292; Non-ACS: unadjusted OR=1.26 (95% CI, 1.03-1.55), P=.03, n=614; adjusted OR=1.24 (95% CI, 0.97-1.58), P=.09, n=577]. Model estimates in the full sample were also similar in sensitivity analyses predicting ED and hospital readmissions separately [ED readmission: unadjusted OR=1.23 (95% CI, 0.98-1.54), P=.07, n=916; adjusted OR=1.25 (95% CI, 0.97-1.62), P=.09, n=869; Hospital readmission: unadjusted OR=1.31 (95% CI, 1.06-1.62), P=.01, n=916; adjusted OR=1.17 (95% CI, 0.91-1.52), P=.22, n=869].

Table 2.

Results from logistic regression model predicting 30-day ED/hospital readmission.

Variable Unadjusted OR (95% CI)a P Adjusted OR (95% CI)b P
ASD symptom scorec 1.32 (1.12-1.56) .001 1.24* (1.02-1.51) .03
Age 0.99 (0.97-1.01) .46
Female 1.20 (0.79-1.84) .40
Race
 non-Hispanic White (ref)
 non-Hispanic Black 2.58 (1.21-5.48) .01
 non-Hispanic Other 2.21 (0.87-5.62) .10
 Hispanic 1.89 (0.96-3.76) .07
GRACE index 1.00 (1.00-1.01) .51
Charlson comorbidity index 0.98 (0.94-1.03) .49
History of CAD 1.62 (1.01-2.60) .04
Diagnosis at discharge
 Non-cardiac diagnosis (ref)
 Non-ACS, cardiac diagnosis 1.52 (0.81-2.83) .19
 ACS 1.24 (0.76-2.05) .39
Depressiond 1.40 (0.86-2.29) .17

Note. ED=emergency department. OR=odds ratio. 95% CI=95% confidence interval. ASD=acute stress disorder. GRACE index=Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events index. CAD=coronary artery disease. ACS=acute coronary syndrome. Bold=P<.05.

a

58 observations deleted from the unadjusted model due to missingness.

b

105 observations deleted from the adjusted model due to missingness.

c

Coefficients are associated with a 10-point increase in ASD symptom score.

d

Depression defined as a Patient Health Questionnaire-8 total score >10.

Discussion

Individual differences in the psychological stress experienced following ACS evaluation were associated with greater likelihood of 30-day ED/hospital readmission, independent of demographics, clinical characteristics, and ACS discharge diagnosis. ASD symptoms were significantly related to increased readmission risk over and above depression, and depression was not a significant predictor of readmission in the adjusted model. Given these initial findings, it is possible that aspects of posttraumatic stress response that do not overlap with depression (e.g., fear-related responses) may be particularly associated with readmission risk. Further research is needed to directly address this question, however. Limitations include single-hospital recruitment, modest participation rate, and lack of comprehensive assessment of other psychopathology (e.g., anxiety). ED factors influence acute posttraumatic stress symptom development [3], and posttraumatic stress shortly after ACS evaluation may help to understand vulnerability for readmission. Treating ASD symptoms can prevent adverse psychological outcomes [5] and might reduce readmission risk.

Highlights.

  • - Thirty-day readmissions are a major concern for hospitals.

  • - Stress is a modifiable factor that may increase risk of readmission.

  • - Participants were enrolled during evaluation for suspected acute coronary syndrome.

  • - Posttraumatic stress was measured days after evaluation for acute coronary syndrome.

  • - Elevated posttraumatic stress symptoms predicted increased 30-day readmission risk.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute: R01HL117832, R01HL123368, K01HL130650. The funders did not have any role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest: The authors report no relationships that could be construed as a conflict of interest.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Kansagara D, Englander H, Salanitro A, et al. Risk prediction models for hospital readmission: a systematic review. JAMA. 2011;306:1688–1698. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Agrawal Y, Panaich S, Aggarwal S, Saltiel F, Kalavakunta JK, Gupta V. Demographic parameters related to 30-day readmission of patients with acute myocardial infarction: analysis of 2,371,867 hospitalizations. Int J Cardiol. 2016;214:408–409. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.03.227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chang BP, Sumner JA, Haerizadeh M, Carter E, Edmondson D. Perceived clinician-patient communication in the emergency department and subsequent posttraumatic stress symptoms in patients evaluated for acute coronary syndrome. Emerg Med J. 2016;33:626–631. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2015-205473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sumner JA, Kronish IM, Pietrzak RH, Shimbo D, Shaffer JA, Parsons FE, Edmondson D. Dimensional structure and correlates of posttraumatic stress symptoms following suspected acute coronary syndrome. J Affect Disord. 2015;186:178–185. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.06.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bryant RA, Moulds ML, Guthrie RM. Acute Stress Disorder Scale: a self-report measure of acute stress disorder. Psychol Assess. 2000;12:61–68. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Eagle KA, Lim MJ, Dabbous OH, et al. A validated prediction model for all forms of acute coronary syndrome: estimating the risk of 6-month postdischarge death in an international registry. JAMA. 2004;291:2727–2733. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.22.2727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Charlson M, Szatrowski T, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47:1245–1251. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90129-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kroenke K, Strine TW, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Berry JT, Mokdad AH. The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population. J Affect Disord. 2009;114:163–173. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.06.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES