Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2017 May 4;5(18):e00214-17. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00214-17

Draft Genome Sequences of Two Isolates of Colletotrichum lindemuthianum, the Causal Agent of Anthracnose in Common Beans

Casley Borges de Queiroz a, Hilberty L Nunes Correia a, Renato Pedrozo Menicucci a, Pedro M Pereira Vidigal b, Marisa Vieira de Queiroz a,
PMCID: PMC5477181  PMID: 28473373

ABSTRACT

Colletotrichum lindemuthianum is the causal agent of anthracnose in common beans, one of the main limiting factors of their culture. Here, we report for the first time, to our knowledge, a draft of the complete genome sequences of two isolates belonging to 83.501 and 89 A2 2-3 of C. lindemutuianum.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Colletotrichum is one of the most widespread and economically important genera among the various damaging plant pathogens (1). This is especially true in tropical and subtropical regions, where Colletotrichum spp. limit the production of important crops, causing severe social and economic impacts (2). Colletotrichum lindemuthianum is the causal agent of anthracnose in the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and attacks its leaves, stems, branches, string beans, and seeds (3). Under favorable conditions of humidity and temperature, in extreme cases, anthracnose can cause death of the plant (4). C. lindemuthianum has a high genetic variability, manifested by the presence of many physiologically diverse races (5). This high genetic variability is one of the main limiting factors to combating this pathogen, because it prevents the long-term use of resistant cultivars (6). The genomes of two isolates, 83.501 and 89 A2 2-3, of C. lindemuthianum were sequenced using the HiSeq 2500 Illumina platform with paired-end reads of 100 bp and an average coverage of 89.3× for isolate 83.501 and 157.7× for isolate 89 A2 2-3 (Laboratório Central de Tecnologias de Alto Desempenho em Ciências de Vida [LaCTAD]). The genes were predicted using Augustus version 3.2.2 (7). For de novo assembly, we used CLC Genomics Workbench 6.5.1. The completeness of the genome was estimated using Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO) (8).

The contig assembly of isolate 83.501 using the CLC Genomics Workbench software resulted in 1,857 contigs (N50, 111.275 kbp), the smallest containing a 1.02-kbp band and the largest containing a 623.12-kbp band, for a total of 97.4 Mbp and a G+C content of 37.6%. The contig assembly of isolate 89 A2 2-3 resulted in 1,276 contigs (N50, 158.217 kb), the smallest containing 1.03 kbp and the largest containing 1.11 Mbp, for a total of 99.16 Mbp, with a G+C content of 37.3%. Assessment of the completeness of the genome using 1,438 BUSCO groups for fungi resulted in 98% complete (C) (6.1% duplicated [D]), 1.0% fragmented (F), 0.2% missed (M), and 1,438 genes (n) for isolate 83.501 and 98% C (6.0% D), 1.1% F, 0.4% M, and 1,438 n for isolate 89 A2 2-3, indicating that the assembled genome covered most of the coding regions. There were 11,673 (isolate 83.501) and 11,627 (isolate 89 A2 2-3) predicted genes.

In this study, we present a draft of the genome sequences belonging to two isolates from different races of C. lindemuthianum. This information will provide a valuable resource for identifying the mechanisms of pathogenesis and the plant-pathogen interactions, as well as new pathogenicity factors. Our data will also allow for comparative genomic studies with other fungal plant pathogens.

Accession number(s).

The sequences from this whole-genome shotgun project for the two strains have been deposited in the DDBJ/ENA/GenBank database under accession numbers MASO00000000 and MASP00000000. The versions described in this paper are the first versions.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq).

The research was conducted with the help of the Cluster UFV (Universidade Federal de Viçosa).

Footnotes

Citation de Queiroz CB, Correia HLN, Menicucci RP, Vidigal PMP, de Queiroz MV. 2017. Draft genome sequences of two isolates of Colletotrichum lindemuthianum, the causal agent of anthracnose in common beans. Genome Announc 5:e00214-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00214-17.

REFERENCES

  • 1.O’Connell RJ, Thon MR, Hacquard S, Amyotte SG, Kleemann J, Torres MF, Damm U, Buiate EA, Epstein L, Alkan N, Altmüller J, Alvarado-Balderrama L, Bauser CA, Becker C, Birren BW, Chen Z, Choi J, Crouch JA, Duvick JP, Farman MA, Gan P, Heiman D, Henrissat B, Howard RJ, Kabbage M, Koch C, Kracher B, Kubo Y, Law AD, Lebrun MH, Lee YH, Miyara I, Moore N, Neumann U, Nordström K, Panaccione DG, Panstruga R, Place M, Proctor RH, Prusky D, Rech G, Reinhardt R, Rollins JA, Rounsley S, Schardl CL, Schwartz DC, Shenoy N, Shirasu K, Sikhakolli UR, Stüber K. 2012. Lifestyle transitions in plant pathogenic Colletotrichum fungi deciphered by genome and transcriptome analyses. Nat Genet 44:1060–1065. doi: 10.1038/ng.2372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cannon PF, Damm U, Johnston PR, Weir BS. 2012. Colletotrichum—current status and future directions. Stud Mycol 73:181–213. doi: 10.3114/sim0014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mahuku GS, Riascos JJ. 2004. Virulence and molecular diversity within Colletotrichum lindemuthianum isolates from Andean and Mesoamerican bean varieties and regions. Eur J Plant Pathol 110:253–263. doi: 10.1023/B:EJPP.0000019795.18984.74. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Campa A, Rodríguez-Suárez C, Giraldez R, Ferreira JJ. 2014. Genetic analysis of the response to eleven Colletotrichum lindemuthianum races in a RIL population of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). BMC Plant Biol 14:115. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-14-115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dos Santos LV, de Queiroz MV, Santana MF, Soares MA, de Barros EG, de Araújo EF, Langin T. 2012. Development of new molecular markers for the Colletotrichum genus using RetroCl1 sequences. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 28:1087–1095. doi: 10.1007/s11274-011-0909-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ansari KI, Palacios N, Araya C, Langin T, Egan D, Doohan FM. 2004. Pathogenic and genetic variability among Colletotrichum lindemuthianum isolates of different geographic origins. Plant Pathol 53:635–642. doi: 10.1111/j.0032-0862.2004.01057.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Stanke M, Steinkamp R, Waack S, Morgenstern B. 2004. AUGUSTUS: a Web server for gene finding in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 32:W309–W312. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. 2015. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31:3210–3212. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES