Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Oncology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Oncology
. 2016 Aug 15;34(31):3823–3824. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.1071

Reply to S. Zhang, L. Fornaro et al, and H.J. Lee et al

Shukui Qin 1,, Jin Li 1
PMCID: PMC5477929  PMID: 27528726

Zhang,1 Fornaro et al,2 and Lee et al3 have posed several questions and suggestions regarding our study4 on apatinib in chemotherapy-refractory gastric cancer.

According to the concept offered by the International Conference on Harmonisation’s E9 guidelines5 and the China Food and Drug Administration,6 it is acceptable to exclude from the full analysis set (FAS) any patient who did not receive at least one dose of trial medication after random assignment. Therefore, we eliminated from the FAS six patients who did not take any trial medication. This is the same approach used in a phase III trial7 in which 162 patients were randomly assigned and three were eliminated from the FAS as a result of not taking any trial medication.

Of the patients in our study with gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, 70% had experienced gastrectomy and 75% were male. Apatinib dosage in our phase III trial was based mainly on the dosage of the previous phase II trial of apatinib in gastric cancer.8 The phase II trial of apatinib in breast cancer, however, was an exploratory study, including dose exploring, and all patients were female.9 Use of a medicine may vary in different studies and indications, such as in the two trials of bevacizumab for breast cancer and colorectal cancer.10,11 In addition, the tolerance dose may differ between men and women patients, although this requires further observation.

In our trial, total dosages in cycles 1, 2, and 3 of the apatinib group were 21,117.05 mg, 20,050.00 mg, and 20,371.38 mg, respectively, and the average doses were 754.2 mg, 716.0 mg, and 730.1 mg, respectively. No treatment-related death was observed throughout the trial.

We appreciate the opportunity to respond to the quality-of-life (QoL) comments mentioned by Zhang.1 In our trial report, at the end of the third cycle, rates of compliance for responding to the QoL questionnaire were 34.7% in the apatinib group and 7.7% in the placebo group. It was suggested that treatment with apatinib may have an effect against the deterioration of patient QoL.

Although there were some Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status differences in two groups at baseline, it was not statistically significant for a randomized, double-blind trial. Thus, this would not influence the overall survival significantly.

The results of our study reported that grade 3 to 4 proteinuria and hypertension occurred in 2.3% and 4.5% of patients, respectively, in the apatinib group. In the REGARD study mentioned by Fornaro et al,2 grade 3 to 4 proteinuria and hypertension developed in 4% and 8% of patients, respectively, in the ramucirumab group.12 Generally, proteinuria and hypertension are recognized as the main characteristic adverse event (AE) of antiangiogenesis agents and have high clinical risk.

The RAINBOW13 trial focused on European and American populations; however, gastric carcinoma in China tends toward younger patients, that is, people age 45 to 64 years have the highest incidence.14 Hence, it is well founded that we enrolled patients age < 70 years in our trial.

Several experimental studies and clinical trials about the efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with chemotherapy are ongoing. Preliminary data have showed synergistic effects of combination therapy and unchanged adverse drug reaction profiles.

Cardiotoxicity-related AEs were observed, reported, and analyzed exactly in this trial. Cardiac toxicity of apatinib was atypical and most AEs were mild or moderate. There was no statistically significant difference in cardiac toxicity between the apatinib and placebo groups.

The relationship between the specific AEs and the efficiency of apatinib has been noted, as Lee et al3 write. In our trial, overall survival for patients who had hypertension, proteinuria, and hand-foot skin reaction was greater than that of patients who did not experience those AEs. These specific AEs could be considered surrogate clinical biomarkers of drug activity. Relevant data analysis will be published soon.

Apatinib is a small molecular and multiple-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor, whereas ramucirumab is a large molecular and humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody. They both mainly target vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, but with different mechanisms. Ramucirumab has not yet been approved for use in China. We look forward to proceeding with head-to-head studies of the two drugs in the future.

AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Reply to S. Zhang, L. Fornaro et al, and H.J. Lee et al

The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or jco.ascopubs.org/site/ifc.

Shukui Qin

No relationship to disclose

Jin Li

Research Funding: Merck Serono (Inst), Amgen (Inst)

REFERENCES

  • 1.Zhang S. Problematic analysis and inadequate toxicity data in phase III apatinib trial in gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:3821. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.3889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fornaro L, Vasile E, Falcone A. Apatinib in advanced gastric cancer: A doubtful step forward. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:3822–3823. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.6931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lee HJ, Moon JY, Baek SW. Is treatment-emergent toxicity a biomarker of efficacy of apatinib in gastric cancer? J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:3823. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.8663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Li J, Qin S, Xu J, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial of apatinib in patients with chemotherapy-refractory advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:1448–1454. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.5995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.US Food and Drug Administration Guidance for industry: E9 statistical principles for clinical trials. http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS117508.
  • 6.China Food and Drug Administration Guidance for chemical medicines and biological products. http://www.sda.gov.cn/WS01/CL1616/83423.html.
  • 7.Johnsson A, Hagman H, Frödin JE, et al. A randomized phase III trial on maintenance treatment with bevacizumab alone or in combination with erlotinib after chemotherapy and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: The Nordic ACT Trial. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:2335–2341. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li J, Qin S, Xu J, et al. Apatinib for chemotherapy-refractory advanced metastatic gastric cancer: Results from a randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm, phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3219–3225. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.48.8585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hu X, Zhang J, Xu B, et al. Multicenter phase II study of apatinib, a novel VEGFR inhibitor in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2014;135:1961–1969. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Earl HM, Hiller L, Dunn JA, et al. Efficacy of neoadjuvant bevacizumab added to docetaxel followed by fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide, for women with HER2-negative early breast cancer (ARTemis): An open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:656–666. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70137-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Schwartzberg LS, Rivera F, Karthaus M, et al. PEAK: A randomized, multicenter phase II study of panitumumab plus modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) or bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with previously untreated, unresectable, wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:2240–2247. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.2473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fuchs CS, Tomasek J, Yong CJ, et al. Ramucirumab monotherapy for previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (REGARD): An international, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2014;383:31–39. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61719-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wilke H, Muro K, Van Cutsem E, et al. Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): A double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:1224–1235. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70420-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al: Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 66:115-132, 2016. [DOI] [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Oncology are provided here courtesy of American Society of Clinical Oncology

RESOURCES