Perceived Cognitive Function for Breast Cancer Survivors: Association of Genetic and Behaviorally-Related Variables for Inflammation

Abstract

Purpose

We explored relationships between genetic variability and behaviorally-related variables (body mass index and exercise frequency) for inflammation, and perceived cognitive function (PCF) for breast cancer survivors (BCS). Our primary aim was to explore relationships between select single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for IL1R1, IL6, TNF genes and PCF. Our secondary aim was to explore whether body mass index (BMI) and exercise frequency moderate these relationships.

Methods

We conducted an exploratory candidate gene substudy. Saliva samples from participants (N=101) in a larger, cross-sectional study were genotyped. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to explore relationships between SNPs and PCF, controlling for age, education level, fatigue, and distress. Hierarchical expansion of regression models included main effects for BMI and exercise frequency and interaction effects between BMI, exercise frequency, and each SNP.

Results

The most parsimonious regression model included fatigue, exercise frequency and IL1R1rs2287047 minor alleles (AA+GG) (R² = .244, Adjusted R² = .220, p = .013). No other SNPs were significant. Higher exercise frequency (b = 7.300, p = 0.013) and IL1R1rs2287047 (AA+AG) (b = 6.512, p = 0.025) predicted better PCF. Greater fatigue predicted poorer PCF (b = −2.359, p <.01). No interaction was demonstrated between BMI and exercise related to PCF or between BMI, exercise and SNPs.

Conclusions

Our results suggest a protective relationship between IL1R1rs2287047 (AA+AG) and PCF and provide further evidence supporting exercise as a potential intervention for poorer PCF. Ours is the first study to investigate genetic variability associated with inflammation, behaviorally-related variables, and PCF for BCS.

Introduction

Cancer- and cancer treatment-related declines in cognitive function are highly prevalent and have a significant and deleterious effect on cancer survivors’ quality of life [1]. Multiple mechanisms likely underlie these declines in cognitive function, among these are the inflammatory pathways associated with the development of cancer and cancer treatment [1]. Variability exists in the severity and duration of poorer cognitive function prior to adjuvant therapy and deterioration in cognitive function during and after treatment for breast cancer [1]. Genetic and behaviorally-related factors for inflammation may influence this variability in cognitive function [1,2]. Research is needed to identify women who may be at increased risk for declines in cognitive function and, ultimately, to design appropriate interventions to prevent or mitigate the impact of cancer and cancer treatment on cognitive function. The purpose of our study was to explore the relationships between genetic variability and behaviorally-related variables (body mass index and exercise frequency) for inflammation, and perceived cognitive function (PCF) for breast cancer survivors.

Background/Significance

During and shortly after chemotherapy for breast cancer the incidence of declines in cognitive function is as high as 65% [3]. Compared to their healthy counterparts, up to 30% of women with breast cancer have poorer cognitive function prior to the initiation of chemotherapy, and long-term sequelae have been documented as long as 20 years after chemotherapy in this population [4]. Understanding the behavioral and genetic characteristics associated with the variability in the onset, severity, and duration of declines in cognitive function will further inform our knowledge of the causal mechanisms for cancer- and cancer treatment-related declines in cognitive function, identification of who is at risk for these problems and the development of effective prevention and management strategies.

A number of biological pathways may be common to the process of natural aging as well as the development of cancer- and cancer treatment-related declines in cognitive function, including both inflammation and genetic susceptibility [5,1]. The release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as, interleukin-1 (IL1), interleukin-6 (IL6), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) is induced both by the body’s inflammatory response to the tumor-related tissue invasion as well as to the administration of chemotherapy and has been associated with complaints of cognitive decline [6–9]. Variability in the expression of genes associated with these pro-inflammatory cytokines also may play a role in cognitive decline. Recent evidence suggests a relationship between polymorphisms of IL1R1 and IL6 genes and participants’ report of cognitive complaints [10,11].

Obesity, or elevated body mass index (BMI) is associated with chronic inflammation (including higher levels of TNFα) and a negative impact on the neural systems involved with cognition and memory [12–15]. Additionally, elevated BMI is associated with lower brain volumes and dementia risk in older-aged populations [16,17]. Women receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer typically gain weight during treatment which may further contribute to the development of cognitive declines and also is associated with increased risk of recurrence and progressive disease [18–21].

Exercise is known to mitigate cognitive decline in the elderly and may be important for women with breast cancer to maintain or reduce BMI and reduce the risk of recurrence and progressive disease [22,23]. Among the proposed mechanisms for the positive impact of exercise on cognitive function are decreases in inflammation, particularly in regions of the brain critical to executive function and memory (frontal lobe and hippocampus) [24,12,25,26]. Preliminary work assessing the potential benefits of various forms of exercise as interventions for cancer-related declines in cognitive function have yielded encouraging results, such as decreased cognitive complaints and enhanced neuropsychological functioning [27–29]. PCF is an individual’s perception of their cognitive ability and is subjectively assessed through patients’ self-report. Our own work demonstrated a negative association between BMI and PCF that was reduced by higher exercise frequency [2]. However, to our knowledge, no studies have been conducted to investigate the relationships between genetic variability for inflammation, behaviorally-related variables (such as BMI and exercise patterns), and PCF for breast cancer survivors.

The primary aim of this study was to explore the relationships between genetic variability of select single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for IL1 Receptor 1 (IL1R1), IL6, and TNF genes and PCF in women with breast cancer. The secondary aim was to explore whether BMI and exercise frequency moderate the relationships between the selected SNPs and PCF.

Methods

Design and Sample

We conducted an exploratory candidate gene substudy participants who took part in a larger cross-sectional parent study [2]. The parent study was designed to investigate potential predictors of perceived cognitive impairment for women with breast cancer and included 363 participants (317 women with breast cancer and 46 controls). Eligible women were 18 years of age or older; able to read, write, and speak English; with no history of previous malignancy, mental illness, dementia, or Alzheimer’s disease. Parent study participants with breast cancer were diagnosed with any stage of disease. Participants with breast cancer were required to be scheduled for, receiving, or finished with chemotherapy including neoadjuvant therapy and were not excluded if currently receiving anti-estrogen therapy. Women with breast cancer were excluded for history of central nervous system metastases or myeloablative chemotherapy regimens in preparation for. The genetic substudy participants included only women with breast cancer who provided permission to be re-contacted following participation in the cross-sectional parent study (n=143, 39.4%). Of these, 101 (70.6%) provided a saliva sample for DNA analyses.

Dependent variable

PCF was measured with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognition Version 3 (FACT-COG) scale for perceived cognitive impairment (PCI, 18 items) [30]. PCI items are rated as to frequency of occurrence between 0 (never) to 4 (several times a day). Psychometric properties are established for the breast cancer population prior to and following chemotherapy (Cronbach’s α= .95; ICC= .82) (Lynne Wagner, personal communication, 2/26/14). Higher scores indicate better perceived function.

Predictor variables

Genetic variants associated with inflammation included functional/putatively functional polymorphisms (i.e., SNPs) for IL6, IL1R1, and TNF (See Table 1). Selection of these SNPs was informed by the current literature. Tagging SNPs were identified through the use of the Phase III International HapMap project (archived data available at ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/hapmap/)[31,32] and were selected using the following criteria: R² ≥ 0.80, minor allele frequency > 0.20, and selected for Caucasian ancestry, which represents the majority of current sample.

Table 1.

Minor Allele Frequency and HWE (N=101)

Gene	SNP	Minor Allele	%	HWE Chi-square test p-value
IL1R1	rs13020778	C	33.0	0.5565
	rs3771200	A	32.0	0.9214
	rs391243	T	6.0	0.0457*
	rs3917304	T	27.0	0.0315*
	rs2287047	A	26.0	0.226
	rs949963±	T	17.0	1.0000†
IL6	rs1800795±	C	33.0	0.335
IL6	rs2069840	G	31.0	0.4033
IL6	rs1474347	C	33.0	0.1592
TNF	rs309366	T	20.0	0.1765†

HWE- Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium

^†=Due to expected counts below 5, Fisher exact test used instead of chi-square test.

^*=p<0.05

^±=Functional SNPs selected from the literature (Merriman et al. 2013; 2014)

Saliva samples were collected with Oragene DNA self-collection kits from DNA Genotek Inc (www.dnagenotek.com) and DNA was extracted from the saliva/buffer combination utilizing the protocol and reagents for extraction supplied with the Oragene kit [33]. The Sequenom iPLEX MassArray platform was used for genotyping (Sequenom Inc., San Diego, CA). SNPs with less than a 95% call rate were re-genotyped using TaqMan allelic discrimination with the ABI Prism 7000 Sequence Detection System (SDS) and SDS software v1.2.3 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA) or eliminated from the analyses. Reliability evaluation steps included: double blind calls of genotypes, checks comparing expected homozygosity to observed homozygosity at each marker, checks of allele frequencies, genotype call rates, and checks of Hardy Weinburg Equilibrium (HWE).

BMI was calculated from parent study participants’ self-report of height and weight. Self-report of height and weight commonly is used to calculate BMI due to the ease of data collection. Based on research results demonstrating minimal clinically relevant differences between self-reported and clinically measured height/weight, the accuracy of the continuous variable of BMI was within acceptable limits [34].

Exercise frequency was measured by parent study participants’ self-report (none, monthly, 2–3 times/week, 4–5 times/week, or daily). Due to sparsely populated categories, exercise frequency was dichotomized as an (0,1) indicator variable (i.e., 0 = ≤2–3 times/week and 1= ≥4–5 times/week) for regression analyses.

Well known potential confounding factors or covariates included age (in completed years), education level (grade school, high school, college, graduate school), fatigue and distress. Due to sparse data in the lower levels, education categories were collapsed, yielding a three-level education variable (high school or less, college, graduate school) from which two indicator variables were created for regression analyses, where graduate school was treated as the reference category. Fatigue and distress severity were assessed with the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) [35]. Participants rated MDASI items on a scale ranging from zero (not present) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine). Cronbach’s α for the MDASI ranges from 0.82–0.94 [35].

Data Analyses

Data were analyzed with IBM SPSS Statistics version 23. Based on our earlier work, we determined a sample size of 100 achieves 80% power to detect effect sizes (R²) of 0.05 for individual SNPs with adjustment for a set of 4 additional variables (age, education, fatigue, and distress) explaining R²=0.24 [2]. Differences between the substudy and parent sample were assessed with Pearson Chi-Square and t-tests. We calculated minor allele frequencies and assessed for departure from HWE. Standard descriptive statistics were computed based on each variable’s level of measurement and observed distribution and data screening was conducted to detect any anomalies (e.g., outliers, missing data) that may impact the validity of results. Missing data was minimal and determined to be missing completely at random (MCAR) by Little’s MCAR test [36]. Listwise deletion was used for all analyses. Bivariate correlations were calculated between the potential confounding variables (age, education, fatigue, distress), the targeted predictor variables and the dependent variable. Results of interest for both aims included the estimated regression coefficients and 95% confidence intervals for the unadjusted and adjusted regression coefficients. BMI and exercise frequency were incorporated into models both individually and collectively. Model assessment (residual analysis and assessment of potential influential observations in terms of estimation of predicted values, regression coefficients, and standard errors for regression coefficients) was performed for all fitted models. Although no univariate or multivariate outliers were identified through initial data screening, model assessment using residual analysis and influence diagnostics identified one participant to be influential (partial regression plots) across a number of variables (age, fatigue, distress, education, BMI, exercise frequency, and the IL1R1rs2287047 genotype). Through a sensitivity analysis, the bivariate correlations and regression model also were examined without the influential participant.

Primary Aim Analysis

Multiple linear regression analysis was used to explore relationships between the presence of at least one copy of a minor allele (homozygous variant genotype or heterozygous genotype compared to homozygous wildtype genotype) for each identified SNP and the continuous outcome variable, PCF. First, models were fitted considering each SNP separately to estimate unadjusted regression coefficients with confidence intervals. To obtain adjusted estimators, the linear regression models were expanded in a hierarchical fashion to also include age and education level (first block), fatigue and distress as potential confounders/covariates (second block), and the allele of interest entered in the third block. Secondary Aim Analysis: In order to explore BMI and exercise frequency as possible moderators of the association of genetic variation on PCF, the multiple linear regression models for the selected SNPs were further expanded in a hierarchical fashion to also include main effects for BMI and exercise patterns in the fourth block and two-way interactions between BMI and exercise patterns with the presence of a minor allele in the fifth block. Interaction terms were created as the products of these variables. Post hoc regression analysis also was conducted to explore the potential impact of endocrine therapy.

Results

The genetic substudy sample (N=101) mirrored the cancer survivors in the parent study sample as the majority were Caucasian, married, well-educated, post-menopausal women (See Table 2). The genetic substudy sample significantly differed from the parent sample for higher education levels (p=.045), lower stage disease (p=.015), lower BMI (p=.017) and less sleep disturbance (p=.031).

Table 2.

Sample Description (N=101)

Age (mean, SD, minimum-maximum)	54.86, 10.78, 34–89
BMI (mean, SD, minimum-maximum)	27.27, 6.21, 18–46
Exercise frequency (n, %)
None	24, 24.2
Monthly	4, 4.0
2–3 x/week	28, 28.3
4–5 x/week	28, 28.3
Daily	15, 15.2
Menopause status (n, %)
Pre	12, 11.9
Peri	5, 5.0
Post	84, 83.2
Chemotherapy status
Pre	14, 13.9
Current	11, 11.9
Post	76, 75.2
Endocrine therapy received (n, %)	51, 50.5
Radiation therapy received (n, %)	54, 53.5
Stage of breast cancer
I (n, %)	35, 34.7
II (n, %)	46, 45.5
III (n, %)	10, 9.9
IV (n, %)	4, 4.0
Not reported (n, %)	6, 5.9
Hispanic or Latino ethnicity (n, %)	2, 2.0
Race (n, %)
Caucasian	95, 94.1
African-American	3, 3.0
Asian	2, 2.0
Pacific Islander	1, 1.0
Marital Status (n, %)
Single	8, 7.9
Married	74, 73.3
Separated	2, 2.0
Divorced	6, 5.9
Widowed	6, 5.9
In a relationship	5, 5.0
Education level (n, %)
High School	13, 12.9
College	60, 59.4
Graduate School	28, 27.7
Work status (n, %)
FT Homemaker	11, 10.9
PT Homemaker	1, 1.0
FT Work	47, 46.5
PT Work	19, 18.8
Retired	19, 18.8
Medical Leave	2, 2.0
Not working	8, 7.9
PCI Score (mean, SD, minimum-maximum)	46.79, 16.43,13–72
Fatigue (mean, SD, minimum-maximum)	3, 2.68, 0–10
Distress (mean, SD, minimum-maximum)	1.88, 2.52, 0–10
Sleep Disturbance (mean, SD, minimum-maximum)	2.49, 2.63, 0–9
Depression (mean, SD, minimum-maximum)	1.58, 2.38, 0–10

BMI- body mass index, SD- Standard deviation, FT- full time, PCI – perceived cognitive impairment, PT- part time

Genotyping was successful for 10 of the 12 identified SNPs. Two SNPs (IL1R1rs2160227 and IL1R1rs391265) were not successfully genotyped using either the iPLEX or TaqMan platforms. Minor allele frequency ranged from 6 to 37% (See Table 1). All SNPs were in HWE except two. We believe this departure from HWE is the result of our sample size and non-random (all women with breast cancer) sampling from the population.

Bivariate correlations between the PCF and the 10 individual SNPs indicated a trend toward significance for only one SNP (IL1R1rs2287047) (r = .177, p=.080) (See Table 3). In our sample, 99 women were genotyped successfully for this polymorphism. Significant correlations were found between PCF and exercise frequency, fatigue, and distress (See Table 3). Fatigue and distress also were highly correlated (see Table 4). No significant correlations were found between BMI and PCF or BMI and exercise. No significant correlations were found between exercise and any of the SNPs.

Table 3.

Correlations with PCI score for full sample and with influential case removed

Correlations with PCI Score for Full Sample (N=99)
	PCI Score	SNP	Exercise Frequency	Fatigue	Distress	Endocrine Therapy
PCI Score	1	.177	.207*	−.370**	−.334**	−.260**
Sig		.080	.038	.000	.001	.009
IL1R1rs2287047-		1	.036	.012	.039	−.092
AA+AG			.722	.903	.704	.368
Sig
Exercise			1	.015	−.213*	.111
Frequency				.882	.032	.269
Sig
Fatigue				1	.533**	.141
Sig					.000	.160
Distress					1	.016
Sig						.872
Correlations with PCI Score with Influential Case Removed (N=98)
	PCI Score	SNP	Exercise Frequency	Fatigue	Distress	Endocrine Therapy
PCI Score	1	.203*	.237*	−.395**	−.349**	−.288**
Sig		.045	.018	.000	.000	.004
IL1R1rs2287047-		1	.026	.020	.042	−.083
AA+AGa			.802	.848	.680	.419
Sig
Exercise			1	.024	−.211*	.124
Frequency				.815	.035	.219
Sig
Fatigue				1	.532**	.134
Sig					.000	.182
Distress					1	.013
Sig						.899

PCI- perceived cognitive impairment, Sig- significance

^*=p<0.05,

^**=p<0.01

Table 4.

Full regression model and parsimonious regression model with influential case removed

Full Regression Model with Influential Case Removed (N=98) R2 = .290, Adjusted R2 = .226
	Unstd Coefficients			95% CI for b
Predictor	b	SE	p-value	Lower Bound	Upper Bound
(Constant)	49.846	12.363		25.281	74.410
Age (years)	0.029	0.145	.840	−0.259	0.318
Collegea	−4.778	3.315	.153	−11.364	1.808
High schoola	2.766	5.005	.582	−7.179	12.711
Fatigue	−2.100	.645	.002	−3.390	−0.809
Distress	−0.819	0.715	.256	−2.024	0.603
BMI (kg/m2)	−0.014	0.251	.956	−0.513	0.485
Exercise Frequency (4–5 days/week or more) b	7.595	3.118	.017	1.399	13.791
IL1R1rs2287047-AA+AGc	6.592	20874	.024	.882	12.302
Parsimonious Regression Model with Influential Case Removed (N=98) R2 = .244, Adjusted R2 = .220
	Unstd Coefficients			95% CI for b
Predictor	b	SE	p-value	Lower Bound	Upper Bound
(Constant)	48.025	2.824	≤.001	49.417	53.633
Fatigue	−2.359	0.533	≤.001	−3.418	−1.300
Exercise Frequency (4–5 days/week or more)a	7.300	2.871	≤.013	1.600	13.000
IL1R1rs2287047-AA+AGb	6.512	2.850	.025	0.854	12.170

^aGraduate school was treated as the reference category for the education level.

^b2–3 days/week or less treated as reference category

^cIL1R1rs2287047-GG was treated as reference category

^a2–3 days/week or less treated as reference category

^bIL1R1rs2287047-GG was treated as reference category

Unstd- unstandardized, SE- standard error, SIG- significance, CI- confidence interval

Aim 1

Multiple linear regression modeling for each SNP and association with PCF were not significant. Model expansion to control for age, education, fatigue, and distress was significant for possession of one or more minor IL1R1rs2287047 alleles (AA+AG) compared to possession of the homozygous wildtype genotype (GG) (R2 = .204, Adjusted R2 = .152, b = 6.151, p = 047). The IL1R1rs2287047 (AA+AG) genotype was associated with better PCF.

Aim 2

Further model expansion to examine the main effects of BMI and exercise frequency on PCF was no longer significant for the full sample of genetic substudy participants (R² =.237, Adjusted R² =.170, p =.145). However fatigue (b = −1.888, p = .007) was a significant predictor of poorer PCF and both higher exercise frequency (b = 6.501, p = .049955) and IL1R1rs2287047 (AA+AG) predicted better PCF (b = 5.955, p = .052) (See Table 4). Neither age nor educational level were significant contributors to the model, nor were BMI or distress.

Results of the multiple linear regression yielded no significant interactions between BMI and PCI or BMI and exercise. Likewise, no significant interactions were found between exercise frequency and possession of IL1R1rs2287047 (AA+AG).

Analyses after omission of the influential case resulted in a significant bivariate correlation between IL1R1rs2287047 (AA+AG) and PCI (.203, p=.045) (See Table 3) and the regression model explained 23% of the variance (R² = .290, Adjusted R² = .226). Possession of IL1R1rs2287047 (AA+AG) contributed significantly (b = 6.592, p=0.024) to the model as did exercise frequency (b = 7.595, p=0.017) (See Table 4). Age, education level, BMI and distress remained non-significant in the model. Thus, the most parsimonious regression model included fatigue, exercise frequency, and IL1R1rs2287047 genotype, explaining 22% of the variance (R² = .242, Adjusted R² = .220) (See Table 4).

Controlling for endocrine therapy (ET) in the full regression model demonstrated significant bivariate correlation between ET and PCI (−.288, p = .004) (See Table 3). The revised full regression model explained 28% of the variance (R² = .352, Adjusted R² = .286). ET contributed significantly to the model (b = −8.246, p = .005) as did exercise frequency (b = 8.258, p = .007) and IL1R1rs2287047 (AA+AG) (b = 5.853, p = .038). The parsimonious regression model explained 27% of the variance (R² = .307, Adjusted R² = .277) when controlling for ET.

Discussion

Possession of one or more IL1R1rs2287047 minor alleles (AA+AG) were associated with better PCF (i.e. higher PCI scores), suggesting a protective effect compared to possession of the homozygous wildtype genotype (GG). Higher levels of fatigue and distress were associated with worse perceived cognitive function (lower PCI scores). Higher levels of exercise frequency were associated with better PCF. We were unable to demonstrate interaction effects between BMI, exercise frequency, and genetic variability for inflammation.

The suggestion of a protective effect for possession of one more IL1R1rs2287047 minor alleles is intriguing. The IL1R1 gene is located in a cluster of related cytokine receptor genes on chromosome 2q12. IL1R1rs2287047 is located in intron-1, a non-coding section of the gene. The A allele of this SNP is associated with a protective effect against severe osteoarthritis of the hand and, even though it is located on a non-coding section of the gene, was found to co-localize with predicted transcription factor binding sites [37]. The IL1R1 gene is associated with activation of nuclear factor kappa B, a modulator of inflammatory and immune gene expression that may be involved in the processes of synaptic plasticity and memory [38]. The IL1R1rs2287047 minor allele also is hypothesized to be protective against activation of the p38 pathway in response to stress stimuli and inflammatory signals [39]. The p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway is involved in cytokine production (including IL1 and TNFα) and the stress response and has been implicated in postoperative pulmonary complications in lung cancer patients as well as other inflammatory processes such as Alzheimer’s disease [40]. Further research with larger sample sizes is warranted to explore the potential protective effect for the IL1R1rs2287047 minor allele against complaints of decreased PCF for breast cancer survivors.

The association of higher exercise frequency with better PCF is consistent with previous research findings and provides further support of exercise as a potential intervention for complaints of decreased cognitive function in breast cancer survivors. Recently published results of two prospective studies demonstrated a relationship between polymorphisms of IL1R1rs949963, IL6rs1800795, and lower scores of self-reported attentional function for patients receiving radiation therapy for breast cancer and their caregivers [10,11]. We found no association between IL1R1rs949963, IL6rs1800795 or TNF SNPs and PCF. This difference in findings may be due to our sample size, time since therapy completion, and the use of different measures of PCF.

Surprisingly, neither age nor education contributed significantly to the regression model. Participants’ ages ranged from 34 to 89 years with a mean age of 54.86 years. The sample was not balanced in terms of education level. Only 13 participants were educated at less than college level. Measurement of years of education (as opposed to levels of education) may have been more informative. As expected, we found significant correlation between fatigue and distress, the other potentially confounding variables. Ultimately fatigue was the only significant predictor when investigated in combination with exercise frequency and IL1R1rs2287047 genotype.

Model assessment identified one participant for whom our regression model did not generalize. Examination of the residual diagnostics indicated that this participant was influential across a number of independent variables (age, fatigue, distress, education, BMI, exercise frequency, and the IL1R1rs2287047 genotype). Interestingly, this participant was one of only two individuals of Hispanic ethnicity. She was 42 years old with stage 1 disease and currently receiving chemotherapy at the time of her participation. She was highly educated (graduate school), premenopausal, married, employed full time, of normal weight (BMI 23), and exercised frequently (4–5 times/week). She reported low levels of fatigue and distress (ranked at 1 out of 10) and no pain or pain medications. Additional available data were examined to try to explain lack of model fit for this participant. Based on responses to the MDASI that we did not include in the regression model due to high correlation with fatigue and distress, we reviewed participants’ ranking for depressive symptoms and disturbed mood. This participant reported a high level of depressive symptoms (ranked 9 out of 10) and disturbed mood (ranked 7 out of 10). Only one participant in the sample reported higher depression (10 out of 10). As with fatigue and distress, depression and mood disturbance are known to be potential confounders for PCF and are associated with markers of inflammation [1,6,41]. Our relatively small sample size and lack of diversity hampered our ability to further discern potential differences for this participant. In addition to depression, other genetic factors that may influence PCF would be of interest such as variation in DNA repair and oxidative stress. A larger, more diverse sample is needed for future research.

This genetic substudy had a number of limitations including a cross-sectional design and no objective measures of cognitive function. Prospective research including objective cognitive measures is needed. However, recent evidence has shown that patients’ self-report of poorer cognitive function is confirmed by neuroimaging studies and actually precedes objectively measured cognitive deficits [42]. This evidence highlights the importance of self-reported changes in cognitive function as a study endpoint. Poorer PCF is associated with negative psychological well-being, decision-making ability, effectiveness in the workplace, and social relationships [43–46]. Lack of age and education matched controls limited our ability to distinguish the influence of disease on cognitive function in this analysis. Objective measurement of exercise frequency, such as electronic physical activity monitoring would have provided a more sensitive and comprehensive assessment of physical activity.

Our study was exploratory. Thus, the sample size was somewhat small for genetic research. Additionally, the genetic substudy sample significantly differed from the parent sample in three areas: lower stage disease, higher education levels, and lower BMI. The lower BMI may have contributed to the inability to demonstrate an interaction between BMI and exercise frequency related to PCF in contrast to the parent study results. The small sample size may have contributed to the lack of interaction between exercise frequency and genetic variability and prevented us from controlling for the impact of time since completion of therapy. However, the results of this study clearly demonstrate the need for additional research to further explore the potential protective effect of exercise frequency and genetic variability, such as possession of the minor allele for IL1R1rs2287047 (AA+AG).

Our sample size also limited the number of potential covariates for control in our original data analysis plan. Estrogenic action has been implicated as a moderator of cognitive function. The impact of endocrine therapy on cognitive function for women with breast cancer has been mixed, although evidence has shown that tamoxifen and aromatase inhibition have been associated with decreased function in various cognitive domains [47,48]. About half of our sample (n=51, 51%) reported receiving endocrine therapy with tamoxifen (n=35, 34.7%), and/or one or more aromatase inhibitors (n=43, 42.6%). Our post hoc examination of the contribution of endocrine therapy supports previous evidence of a detrimental impact on PCF.

Conclusions

Our primary aim was to explore the relationship between genetic variability of select SNPs for IL1R1, IL6, and TNF associated with inflammation and PCF. Our results suggest a possible protective relationship between possession of the minor allele for IL1R1rs2287047 (AA+AG) and PCF.

Our secondary aim was to explore whether BMI and exercise frequency moderate the relationship between selected SNPs and PCF. In this genetic substudy we were unable to demonstrate interactions between BMI, exercise frequency, and the SNPs associated with inflammation that were genotyped. However, as with our earlier work, higher exercise frequency was a significant predictor of better perceived cognitive function. Our results provide further support to the hypothesis that exercise frequency may mitigate the complaints of decreased cognitive function for survivors of breast cancer.

These data are intriguing and hypothesis generating. Further research with a larger and more ethnically diverse sample is needed to investigate potential interactions between ethnicity, depressive symptoms, and genetic phenotype. A larger sample size also is needed to further examine the relationship observed between BMI, exercise frequency and cognitive function in our earlier work.