Skip to main content
Microbial Biotechnology logoLink to Microbial Biotechnology
. 2017 Jan 18;10(4):773–788. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12457

Effect of temperature and colonization of Legionella pneumophila and Vermamoeba vermiformis on bacterial community composition of copper drinking water biofilms

Helen Y Buse 1,, Pan Ji 2, Vicente Gomez‐Alvarez 1, Amy Pruden 2, Marc A Edwards 2, Nicholas J Ashbolt 3
Editors: Eberhard Morgenroth, Hans‐Curt Flemming, Joana Azeredo, Luis F Melo, Manuel Espinosa, Marvin Whiteley, Romain Briandet
PMCID: PMC5481522  PMID: 28097816

Summary

It is unclear how the water‐based pathogen, Legionella pneumophila (Lp), and associated free‐living amoeba (FLA) hosts change or are changed by the microbial composition of drinking water (DW) biofilm communities. Thus, this study characterized the bacterial community structure over a 7‐month period within mature (> 600‐day‐old) copper DW biofilms in reactors simulating premise plumbing and assessed the impact of temperature and introduction of Lp and its FLA host, Vermamoeba vermiformis (Vv), co‐cultures (LpVv). Sequence and quantitative PCR (qPCR) analyses indicated a correlation between LpVv introduction and increases in Legionella spp. levels at room temperature (RT), while at 37°C, Lp became the dominant Legionella spp. qPCR analysis suggested Vv presence may not be directly associated with Lp biofilm growth at RT and 37°C, but may contribute to or be associated with non‐Lp legionellae persistence at RT. Two‐way PERMANOVA and PCoA revealed that temperature was a major driver of microbiome diversity. Biofilm community composition also changed over the seven‐month period and could be associated with significant shifts in dissolved oxygen, alkalinity and various metals in the influent DW. Hence, temperature, biofilm age, DW quality and transient intrusions/amplification of pathogens and FLA hosts may significantly impact biofilm microbiomes and modulate pathogen levels over extended periods.

Introduction

Biofilms are an important source of microorganisms within drinking water (DW) systems, where sessile growth confers a growth advantage compared to their planktonic counterparts [reviewed in Berry et al., 2006]. Drinking water biofilms are ubiquitous within distribution systems and in premise (i.e. building) plumbing, providing an ideal microenvironment for a diverse array of microorganisms, with their development influenced by water chemistry (Ji et al., 2015); disinfectant residual (Shen et al., 2016); pipe material/corrosion products (Yu et al., 2010; Buse et al., 2013b; Lin et al., 2013; Buse et al., 2014); biofilm age (Martiny et al., 2003; Lee et al., 2005); and composition of upstream microbiomes (Pinto et al., 2012; Lu et al., 2014). Drinking water biofilms are viewed as a source of pathogens as they provide a reservoir for their accumulation/growth and subsequent release. Opportunistic, water‐based pathogens, such as representative Legionella spp., Mycobacterium spp. and Pseudomonas spp., have all been reported to grow within DW biofilms (Falkinham et al., 2001; Wingender and Flemming, 2004; Feazel et al., 2009; Buse et al., 2014; Lu et al., 2014). In particular, L. pneumophila may now account for some 66% of DW‐related outbreaks in the United States, noting a 286% increase in legionellosis cases between 2000 and 2014 (0.42–1.62 cases per 100 000 persons; Garrison et al., 2016). Similarly in Europe, between 2012 and 2014, an increase in Legionnaires’ disease cases (5852–6941 respectively) was also observed with the majority of those due to L. pneumophila and hot‐ and cold‐water systems and cooling towers being implicated as likely sources (ECDC, 2016). Coupled with the significant healthcare costs due to Legionnaires’ disease and non‐tuberculous mycobacteria (with over 400 and 6000 hospital cases and associated healthcare costs of $9.4 and 46 million between 2004 and 2007 in the United States respectively; Collier et al., 2012), these water‐based pathogens are a major concern from economic and public health standpoints.

Drinking water biofilm development has been shown to differ based on plumbing surface material such as chlorinated, plasticized and unplasticized polyvinylchloride (cPVC, pPVC and uPVC, respectively), polybutylene, cast iron, cross‐linked polyethylene (PEX), copper (Cu), stainless steel (SS) and glass (Rogers and Keevil, 1992; Rogers et al., 1994; Armon et al., 1997; Kuiper et al., 2004; Lehtola et al., 2007; Moritz et al., 2010; Valster et al., 2010; Messi et al., 2011; Lin et al., 2013). Unfortunately, most biofilm‐related studies to date are on the order of days to weeks with water chemistries not representative of DW, and longer‐term comparisons of L. pneumophila‐associated biofilm growth between surface materials are both rare and often conflicting. After laboratory inoculation of L. pneumophila into biofilm reactors operated at 20°C, culturable L. pneumophila can persist for up to 4 weeks in PEX‐ and Cu‐grown DW biofilms and up to 4 months in uPVC‐grown DW biofilms (Moritz et al., 2010; Buse et al., 2013b). However, at the same temperature, L. pneumophila culturability was not supported within Cu DW biofilms compared to growth within polybutylene and cPVC DW biofilms; yet at 40°C, L. pneumophila was culturable for up to 3 weeks within Cu DW biofilms in the same study (Rogers et al., 1994). Survival of L. pneumophila was enhanced on PVC‐grown relative to glass‐grown DW biofilms (Armon et al., 1997), while colonization of Cu‐grown DW biofilms occurred more readily and persistently than within uPVC‐grown DW biofilms (Buse et al., 2013). Collectively, these studies indicate that legionellae‐related biofilm development is a common, yet complex phenomenon that is heavily impacted by temperature, surface material, water quality and age, among other factors. Thus, it is difficult to interpret key factors impacting L. pneumophila biofilm colonization; however, characterizing the broader bacterial composition of biofilms could draw further insight. This could allow comparisons to be made across studies, providing principles of L. pneumophila ecological interactions and potentially explaining otherwise aberrant observations regarding the factors influencing its colonization of biofilms.

Free‐living amoebae (FLA), such as Acanthamoeba spp. and Vermamoeba (formerly Hartmannella) vermiformis, are also a public health concern as they are known hosts for L. pneumophila (Harb et al., 2000; Lau and Ashbolt, 2009) and have been co‐isolated from L. pneumophila‐contaminated systems (Yamamoto et al., 1992; Thomas et al., 2006, 2008). Acanthamoeba spp. are less abundant in freshwater and DW systems compared to V. vermiformis (Valster et al., 2010; Buse et al., 2013a), with the latter demonstrated to be the prominent host for L. pneumophila in DW derived from hospital and recreational building hot‐water tanks (Wadowsky et al., 1988; Fields et al., 1989), within polyethylene‐ and pPVC‐grown DW biofilms (Kuiper et al., 2004; Valster et al., 2010) and within SS biofilms composed of P. aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Flavobacterium spp. (Murga et al., 2001). A previous study reported high infectivity and intracellular replication of L. pneumophila strain Chicago‐2 within the strain CDC‐19 of permissive amoeba host, V. vermiformis (Buse and Ashbolt, 2011); thus, both were chosen for use in this study.

The aim of this study was to profile bacterial diversity and relative abundance within complex, mature DW biofilms (initially grown on Cu surfaces at pH > 8.2 for over 600 days) and track taxonomic changes as a function of operating temperature and introduction of L. pneumophila and V. vermiformis leading to colonization over an extended period (7 months). The overall goal of this work was to advance understanding of complex microbial niches conducive to water‐based pathogen colonization and survival within DW biofilms.

Results

Quantification of Legionella spp., L. pneumophila and V. vermiformis within Cu DW biofilms

All control (Con) and LpVv reactor biofilm samples contained levels of Legionella spp. detectable by quantitative PCR (qPCR; Fig. 1A and B respectively). Legionella spp. were consistently detected in all Cu biofilms from Con_RT reactors, ranging 1.9–2.9 log10 cell equivalents (CE) cm−2 from day 0 (before LpVv inoculation) to month 7 (except month 5, where levels dropped to 1.1 log10 CE cm−2; Fig. 1A, blue circles). In contrast, Legionella spp. were detected only at day 0 to week 1, month 2, month 6 and month 7, with levels between 1.2 and 1.7 log10 CE cm−2, with a spike at month 6 of 2.7 log10 CE cm−2 in Con_37°C biofilms (Fig. 1A, red circles). Notably, after the introduction of LpVv co‐cultures into the reactors (E2; Fig. S1), Legionella spp. were detected in all biofilm samples at each temperature, with LpVv_RT biofilm samples displaying a more consistent Legionella spp. level of between 2.8 and 4.3 log10 CE cm−2 for all time points, while levels within the LpVv_37°C‐derived biofilms fluctuated between 1.2 and 4.2 log10 CE cm−2 throughout the experiment (Fig. 1B). These observations based on qPCR were corroborated by the relative abundance of Legionella spp.‐associated sequences within the biofilm samples from each reactor (Fig. 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis of Legionella spp., Legionella pneumophila and Vermamoeba vermiformis. Biofilm samples were subjected to qPCR assays targeting the 16S rRNA gene of Legionella spp. (A, B), the sidF gene of L. pneumophila (C) and the 18S rRNA gene of V. vermiformis (D). Data represent the mean for duplicate samples with standard error mean bars.

Legionella spp. quantification data for control (Con) and inoculated (LpVv) biofilm samples are shown separately (A and B respectively). Legionella pneumophila was not detected in the control reactors except at the 6‐month time point (indicated by the black arrow, C). The limit of quantification of 1 log10 CE cm−2 is indicated by the red dotted line.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Relative abundance of Legionella spp.‐ and L. pneumophila‐associated sequences in biofilm samples.

The relative abundance of Legionella spp. (A and B) and L. pneumophila (C) OTU taxonomic assignments is shown based on 16S rRNA gene sequences derived from Con_RT (blue circle), Con_37°C (red circle), LpVv_RT (blue square) and LpVv_37°C (red square) Cu DW biofilms at each time point.

Legionella pneumophila was not detected in control reactor biofilm samples as measured by qPCR (except at month 6 where duplicate biofilm samples contained Lp levels between 2.4 and 3.0 log10 CE cm−2; Fig. 1C, red circles, black arrow). Legionella pneumophila levels in LpVv_RT biofilm samples were transient, detectable only between day 4 and month 1, with levels decreasing steadily post‐inoculation from 3.2 to 1.5 log10 CE cm−2 (Fig. 1C, blue squares). Furthermore, Lp levels in LpVv_RT biofilms were most likely due to the LpVv co‐culture inoculation as no Lp was detected at day 0 (before LpVv inoculation), which is in contrast to Lp levels in the LpVv_37°C biofilms, where starting Lp levels at day 0 (before LpVv inoculation) were 2.2 log10 CE cm−2 (Fig. 1C, red squares). Lp levels in LpVv_37°C biofilms proceeded to fluctuate between 1.2 and 4.2 log10 CE cm−2 in a similar pattern as observed for Legionella spp. levels in the same samples (Fig. 1B and C, red squares). Again, these qPCR‐based observations were corroborated by the relative abundance of Legionella spp.‐associated sequences within the biofilm samples from each reactor (Fig. 2). It has been previously demonstrated that partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing can identify Legionella isolates to the genus level and also allow for the differentiation of L. pneumophila from non‐pneumophila Legionella species (Wilson et al., 2007). Thus, in this study, the ability of the partial 16S rRNA gene sequences to differentiate L. pneumophila from non‐pneumophila Legionella species was confirmed by comparing sequences against the ribosomal databases SILVA, Greengenes and RDP, using 100% cut‐off and similarity values for the analysis which yielded consistent results for each database.

Notably, Vv was not detected in any of the control biofilm samples, and in inoculated reactors, Vv was detected only transiently in the LpVv_37°C biofilms at day 4 and week 1 (Fig. 1D, red squares, 2.7 and 2.3 log10 CE cm−2 respectively). In contrast, Vv levels were consistently and persistently high in LpVv_RT biofilms (Fig. 1D, blue squares; 2.4–3.1 log10 CE cm−2).

Bacterial diversity and relative abundance in Cu DW biofilms

Bacterial phylum‐level taxonomic assignments revealed different compositions within each of the four reactors with members of the phylum Proteobacteria representing the dominant population within biofilm samples (Table 1). Specifically, the relative abundance of α‐Proteobacteria in each reactor ranged from 41% to 57%; however, β‐Proteobacteria were about twice as abundant in biofilms incubated at RT (18–19%) than at 37°C (9–11%) while, conversely, γ‐Proteobacteria were about twice as abundant in biofilm incubated at 37°C (10–15%) than at RT (5–10%; Table 1). Notably, when compared to the other three reactors, Acidobacteria‐ and Bacteroidetes‐associated sequences were more dominant in LpVv_37°C (21 versus 0.1%) and LpVv_RT (11 versus 2–5%) respectively, indicating that, in the presence of Lp and Vv, higher temperatures supported a greater abundance of the Acidobacteria sequences while an abundance of Bacteroidetes bacteria‐associated sequences was more supported at lower temperatures. In Con_37°C biofilms, the absence of LpVv and higher temperatures seemed to support a higher diversity of bacteria including Gemmatimonadetes, Planctomycetes and δ‐Proteobacteria sequences being more abundant compared to samples from the other three reactors (Table 1). Moreover, introduction of LpVv into Cu DW biofilms seemed to result in a slight decrease in the group of bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs) that were detected at < 1% each (Table 1; LpVv samples 3–5% versus Con samples 6–7%), an observation that is corroborated by the decrease in richness and diversity indices of the LpVv biofilm samples (Fig. 3).

Table 1.

Distribution of bacterial phyla within samples from each reactor

Phylum Relative abundance (%)
Con_RT Con_37°C LpVv_RT LpVv_37°C
Proteobacteria 79.0 74.9 81.3 62.1
α‐Proteobacteria 50.7 48.5 56.6 40.9
β‐Proteobacteria 18.0 9.1 19.4 10.7
γ‐Proteobacteria 9.6 15.1 4.9 10.0
δ‐Proteobacteria 0.7 2.2 0.4 0.4
Actinobacteria 9.0 8.6 3.5 6.8
Acidobacteria 0.1 0.1 0.1 21.2
Bacteroidetes 4.9 2.0 10.8 2.0
Gemmatimonadetes 0.5 4.1 0.6 1.9
Planctomycetes 0.4 3.1 0.4 1.4
Others < 1% 6.2 7.3 3.4 4.7
Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Relative abundance is shown for each reactor for all time points.

Classes of Proteobacteria and their relative abundance are shown in grey text.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Alpha diversity indices for sequences derived from biofilm samples. Richness, Shannon diversity and phylogenetic diversity indices are shown for all biofilm‐derived sequences from each of the four reactors. The black dots represent libraries that were considered outliers during diversity analyses (LpVv_RT: month 5 and LpVv_37°C: week 1 samples).

Effect of temperature and LpVv inoculation on the microbiome of Cu DW biofilms

Compared to Con biofilm samples at either temperature, there was an association between LpVv inoculation and a lower number of species (richness index: LpVv samples mean c. 180 versus Con samples mean c. 325) and reduced diversity of the bacterial community (Shannon and phylogenetic diversity indices: LpVv samples mean c. 3.3 and 11 versus Con samples mean c. 3.6 and 20 respectively; Fig. 3). Although LpVv introduction into the biofilm samples influenced overall community composition, principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of the biofilm sequences indicated that temperature was the major driver of diversity, contributing to 31% of the total variation in biofilm samples at all time points compared to LpVv inoculation contributing 11% of the total variation (Fig. S2). Two‐way PERMANOVA of the samples also indicated that temperature played a major role in biofilm microbiome composition (F = 20.6, P = 0.0001) compared to pathogen and host inoculation (F = 6.1, P = 0.0001), while the combined effect of temperature and LpVv inoculation was also statistically relevant in determining overall diversity (F = 5.1, P = 0.0002; Table 2). A non‐metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination plot also indicated temperature had a more significant impact on the microbiomes (observed as the tight clustering of RT compared to 37°C biofilm samples) than LpVv inoculation (observed as individual reactor samples forming secondary clusters; Fig. 4A). Despite the relatively high OTU number identified from all biofilm samples in this study (> 2,700), only 20 OTUs were responsible for c. 66% of dissimilarity (based on SIMPER analysis) between biofilm samples (Fig. 4B and C).

Table 2.

Results of two‐way PERMANOVA with permutation N: 9999

Source Sum of squares df Mean square F P
Temperature
RT versus 37°C 2.333 1.0 2.333 20.639 0.0001
Variable
Con versus LpVv 0.690 1.0 0.690 6.103 0.0001
Interaction
Temperature versus Variable 0.574 1.0 0.574 5.080 0.0002
Residual 4.974 44.0 0.113
Total 8.572 47.0

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Non‐metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination plots and major OTU contributors for biofilm samples.

A. NMDS plot representing the relationship for each reactor (symbols for each shown in the lower right‐hand corner square) between incubation temperature (red versus black symbols) and time points biofilms were sampled (T0–T11) with duplicates combined (n = 48).

B. Green arrows indicate the orientation and contribution (i.e. greatest change) of OTUs between all the biofilm samples from each reactor. Yellow boxes indicate OTUs specific to a single reactor, and the black box indicates the OTU that is found in all reactor samples. OTUs that are found more abundantly in RT and 37 C samples are highlighted in the upper left and right ovals respectively. The distribution and taxonomy of the major OTU contributors are shown in (C).

Nine of the 20 major OTUs identified were more abundant in Con_RT and LpVv_RT biofilm samples than in 37°C‐derived biofilms: class β‐Proteobacteria, order Sphingomonadales, family Chitinophagaceae and Comamonadaceae (two OTUs), and genus Bradyrhizobium, Rhodobacter (two OTUs) and Reyranella (Fig. 4B, upper left oval cluster, and C). Five of the 20 major OTUs identified were more abundant in Con_37°C and LpVv_37°C biofilm samples than in RT‐derived biofilms: family Acetobacteraceae and genus Erythromicrobium, Gemmatimonas, Phenylobacterium and Sphingopyxis (Fig. 4B, upper right oval cluster, and C). Unique OTUs, which were defined as being abundant in biofilm samples from a single reactor, included sequences associated with the genus Sphingomonas in Con_RT samples, Pseudomonas in Con_37°C and family Ellin6075 in LpVv_37°C samples (Fig. 4B, yellow boxes, and C). Ellin6075, affiliated with the bacterial phylum Acidobacteria, had a relative abundance of 21% in LpVv_37°C samples, but was not identified in the other three reactors (Fig. 4C), and could also be contributing exclusively to the relative abundance of 21% of Acidobacteria bacterial phylum sequences observed for LpVv_37°C samples (Table 1). Notably, a relatively high abundance (3–8%) of Mycobacterium‐associated sequences was found in all reactors and they did not cluster with any particular reactor samples in the NMDS plots indicating the organism's ability to stably colonize DW Cu biofilms regardless of temperature and pathogen/host colonization (Fig. 4B, black box, and C).

To visualize community changes under the respective inoculation and temperature conditions over time, taxonomic assignments expressed as a percentage of total OTUs for each biofilm samples were plotted (Fig. 5). As stated above, temperature was the primary driver, followed by LpVv inoculation as the secondary driver, of microbiome diversity, which was visualized in the OTU profiles between the samples within each reactor (Fig. 5). The temporal OTU profiles revealed that not only were Acidobacteriaceae (Ellin6075)‐associated sequences highly abundant in LpVv_37°C samples, but abundance increased with time after inoculation (Fig. 5D, dark green bars). Moreover, starting at month 1, OTU profiles substantially shifted in each reactor as compared to their respective day 0–week 3 profiles, most notably for sequences associated with the majority of the top 20 contributing OTUs, in addition to sequences associated with the genera Gemmata in Con_37°C and LpVv_37°C samples and Rhodoplanes in LpVv_RT samples (Fig. 5). The change in OTU profiles after 1 month may also be explained by several significant changes in water quality characteristics over time such as an increase in per cent dissolved oxygen (DO) and decreases in alkalinity, barium (Ba) and sulfur (S), and fluctuations in aluminium (Al), calcium (Ca), sodium (Na), sulfur (S) and zinc (Zn) concentrations (Table 3). For example, percent DO at 6–7 months were significantly higher than the levels at day 4 to month 4 (ANOVA, P < 0.05), while Ca, Na, S and Zn levels fluctuated significantly throughout the 510‐day biofilm accumulation stage up until the 7‐month post‐inoculation time point (Table 3).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

OTU taxonomic assignments expressed as percentage of total assigned sequences for each sample.

16S rRNA gene sequences derived from Con_RT (A), Con_37°C (B), LpVv_RT (C) and LpVv_37°C (D) Cu DW biofilms for each time point. In each legend, OTUs in coloured text indicate the following: absence or low abundance of sequences (grey); unique or abundant sequences for that reactor (red); sequences found in abundance in Con reactors only (blue); sequences found in abundance in LpVv reactors only (green); and sequences found in abundance in reactors incubated at 37°C only (purple).

Table 3.

Water quality measurements of CDC biofilm reactor feed water

Parameters Units Start to E1 (510 days) E1 to E2 (101 days) T0 Post‐inoculation (time point[s])
1 month (T1–T5) 2 months (T6) 3 months (T7) 4 months (T8) 5 months (T9) 6 months (T10) 7 months (T11)
pH 8.43 ± 0.16 8.25 ± 0.37 8.45 ± 0.18 8.58 ± 0.05 8.57 ± 0.06 8.65 ± 0.06 8.55 ± 0.05 8.38 ± 0.05 8.38 ± 0.03
Temperature °C 19.84 ± 0.71 20.60 ± 0.52 20.61 ± 0.38 20.37 ± 0.21 19.89 ± 0.60 18.40 ± 0.80 18.61 ± 0.78 18.89 ± 0.81 18.67 ± 0.34
Conductivity mS cm−1 0.37 ± 0.08 0.365 ± 0.02 0.345 ± 0.02 0.395 ± 0.02 0.426 ± 0.01 0.455 ± 0.05 0.473 ± 0.05 0.322 ± 0.01 0.364 ± 0.01
DO % 78.1 ± 8.2 69.7 ± 8.5 65.4 ± 2.4 68.4 ± 3.2 67.7 ± 2.3 72.5 ± 2.4a 75.7 ± 2.6a , b , c 81.4 ± 1.8a , b , c , d 82.8 ± 2.5a , b , c , d
Free Cl2 mg l−1 0.40 ± 0.23 0.44 ± 0.07 0.49 ± 0.08 0.61 ± 0.05 0.60 ± 0.05 0.68 ± 0.14 0.59 ± 0.12 0.34 ± 0.12 0.41 ± 0.06
Total Cl2 0.44 ± 0.22 0.47 ± 0.07 0.609 ± 0.05 0.637 ± 0.04 0.628 ± 0.04 0.714 ± 0.14 0.633 ± 0.11 0.391 ± 0.12 0.458 ± 0.06
Alkalinity 68.6 ± 9.8 68.5 ± 3.9 78.7 ± 6.2 79.6 ± 5.2 76.8 ± 0.8 83.0 ± 6.0c 87.8 ± 5.1 58.6 ± 2.3a , b , c , d , e 63.3 ± 2.4a , b , c , d , e
TOC 1.02 ± 0.41 0.96 ± 0.42 1.02 ± 0.30 0.68 ± 0.26 0.54 ± 0.03 0.86 ± 0.15 1.01 ± 0.15 1.07 ± 0.10 0.92 ± 0.07
NO3 0.82 ± 0.17 0.84 ± 0.18 0.88 ± 0.14 0.72 ± 0.04 0.73 ± 0.03 0.89 ± 0.11 0.92 ± 0.09 0.87 ± 0.13 0.97 ± 0.05
PO4 0.22 ± 0.06 0.19 ± 0.04 0.21 ± 0.04 0.22 ± 0.02 0.15 ± 0.05 0.15 ± 0.04 0.15 ± 0.02 0.10 ± 0.02 0.11 ± 0.03
Ca 31.1 ± 3.0 28.9 ± 1.0 28.89 ± 1.8 32.01 ± 1.9 34.09 ± 1.8 35.63 ± 5.1a 37.96 ± 2.8 27.34 ± 1.1c , d , e 30.4 ± 1.3
K 2.3 ± 0.5 2.0 ± 0.9 2.5 ± 0.2 2.6 ± 0.1 2.6 ± 0.1 3.0 ± 0.4 3.2 ± 0.3 2.2 ± 0.1 1.9 ± 0.1
Mg 10.0 ± 2.0 9.3 ± 0.6 8.4 ± 0.7 9.9 ± 0.5 10.3 ± 0.5 11.4 ± 1.3 12.2 ± 1.0 8.1 ± 0.4 9.1 ± 0.5
Na 24.6 ± 8.4 23.1 ± 2.1 19.1 ± 1.1 24.7 ± 1.9 28.8 ± 1.4a 30.9 ± 4.9a , b 32.2 ± 5.1a 19.2 ± 1.4c , d , e 22.5 ± 1.5d
P 0.16 ± 0.03 0.17 ± 0.08 0.17 ± 0.01 0.17 ± 0.01 0.16 ± 0.01 0.16 ± 0.01 0.17 ± 0.01 0.13 ± 0.01 0.13 ± 0.01
S 23.3 ± 5.7 21.2 ± 2.1 17.7 ± 0.6 22.2 ± 1.6 26.7 ± 2.2a 27.0 ± 4.2a 27.9 ± 3.0a 17.9 ± 1.3c , d , e 19.5 ± 0.8c , d
Si 2.2 ± 0.7 2.1 ± 0.3 3.0 ± 0.1 2.6 ± 0.1 2.3 ± 0.1 2.3 ± 0.0 2.2 ± 0.1 2.8 ± 0.2 2.9 ± 0.1
Sr 0.22 ± 0.06 0.22 ± 0.02 0.19 ± 0.01 0.22 ± 0.01 0.23 ± 0.02 0.28 ± 0.02 0.28 ± 0.04 0.17 ± 0.01 0.19 ± 0.01
Al μg l−1 45.9 ± 20.0 54.1 ± 13.9 67.2 ± 7.1 74.2 ± 11.6a 61.6 ± 11.2b 42.4 ± 4.9a , b , c 45.4 ± 3.3a , b , c 41.5 ± 2.2b , c 31.0 ± 5.1a , b , c , d , e , f
Ba 38.6 ± 7.4 36.7 ± 4.2 35.9 ± 1.5 41.1 ± 2.1 43.6 ± 1.5a 42.3 ± 3.8a 42.4 ± 4.6 33.2 ± 1.5b , c , d 32.3 ± 1.3b , c , d
Cu 26.0 ± 4.9 20.7 ± 2.2 17.8 ± 0.8 17.7 ± 1.2 16.0 ± 0.9 16.6 ± 1.8 19.9 ± 0.9 19.0 ± 1.1 21.2 ± 2.3
Fe 21.2 ± 24 14.7 ± 4.0 11.9 ± 2.8 16.6 ± 5.9 14.9 ± 1.4 16.9 ± 6.9 14.6 ± 1.5 15.2 ± 1.5 12.6 ± 10.9
Pb 3.3 ± 2.2 2.4 ± 1.1 3.6 ± 0.8 2.3 ± 1.6 1.3 ± 1.5 2.3 ± 0.3 2.2 ± 0.2 1.8 ± 1 3.3 ± 2.2
Zn 89.8 ± 25.3 90.3 ± 12.0 66.1 ± 4.3 73.7 ± 4.9a 80.7 ± 5.4a , b 84.6 ± 12.9a , b 113.8 ± 21.6a , b , c , d 132.5 ± 6.5b , c , d , e 141.6 ± 7.6a , b , c , d , e , f

Total organic carbon, TOC; nitrate, NO3; calcium, Ca; potassium, K: magnesium, Mg; sodium, Na; sulfur, S; silicon, Si; phosphate, PO4; aluminium, Al; borium, Ba; copper, Cu; iron, Fe; phosphorous, P; lead, Pb; strontium, Sr; zinc, Zn; alkalinity as measured by CaCO3 concentration.

Values expressed as mean ± standard deviation.

Two‐way ANOVA for each parameter:

a P < 0.05 for T1‐T5 versus T6, T7, T8, T9, T10 and T11.

b P < 0.05 for T6 versus T7, T8, T9, T10 and T11.

c P < 0.05 for T7 versus T8, T9, T10 and T11.

d P < 0.01 for T8 versus T9, T10 and T11.

e P < 0.05 for T9 versus T10 and T11.

f P < 0.05 for T10 versus T11.

Discussion

Impact of L. pneumophila colonization within copper DW biofilms

Copper (Cu) is a commonly used pipe material within premise plumbing systems (Council, 2006). The antimicrobial properties of Cu on L. pneumophila inactivation have been demonstrated previously (Lin et al., 1996; Biurrun et al., 1999), with the combined effects of copper–silver ionization considered an effective control strategy for L. pneumophila in US hospital water systems (Lin et al., 2011). However, it has been reported that the antimicrobial properties of Cu can be negatively impacted by biofilm age, accumulation and presence of corrosion products. As measured by total bacterial counts, early biofilm growth (≤ 30 days) on Cu surfaces was lower than on PVC or PEX material (Mathys et al., 2008; Morvay et al., 2011), while in older, mature biofilms (18 months old), Cu biofilm growth was two‐ to eightfold higher than PVC, PE and SS biofilms (Wingender and Flemming, 2004). Moreover, Legionella densities were initially higher in < 250‐day‐old SS than in Cu biofilms, but after 24 months, similar levels of Legionella were observed within SS and Cu biofilms suggesting the inhibitory effect of Cu on Legionella may be transient and reduced by the accumulation of corrosion products on the Cu surfaces over time (van der Kooij et al., 2005). Although there is currently no standard definition of a mature DW biofilm (with studies labelling 1‐ to 2‐year‐old (Boe‐Hansen et al., 2002; Wingender and Flemming, 2004) and 20‐year‐old (Henne et al., 2012) DW biofilms as mature), the consensus seems to be that mature biofilms consist of a complex and functional microbial community that exhibits physiological cooperation and metabolic efficiency all of which is gradually developed (Costerton et al., 1995; Dunne, 2002). Thus, mature DW biofilms may be a more accurate representation of biofilms within building systems, and hence more relevant in examining Legionella colonization in premise plumbing systems.

Using approximately 20‐month‐old biofilms, the results from this study indicated that Cu DW biofilms inoculated with LpVv co‐cultures exhibited temperature‐dependent colonization of Lp at high and persistent levels for up to 7 months (Fig. 1C). Specifically, colonization of Lp within Cu biofilms incubated at RT resulted in an increase in the overall levels of Legionella spp. members; yet colonization of Lp within biofilms incubated at 37°C resulted in the dominance of Lp over other Legionella spp. Non‐L. pneumophila members of the Legionella genus seem to be more adept at lower temperature growth (Figs 1A and 2), while higher temperatures appear to select for Lp growth, an observation which has been previously reported (Wullings and van der Kooij, 2006). Thus, although the temperature‐dependent growth of Lp in DW has been described in other studies (Rogers et al., 1994; Rhoads et al., 2015), an interesting observation from this study was the influence of Lp biofilm colonization on other Legionella genus members, which had not been directly demonstrated previously. Additionally, this study further corroborates the general observation that Cu pipe is not universally antimicrobial against Legionella spp. nor L. pneumophila, especially at the higher pH values (> pH 8.2; Table 3; Lin 2002) tested in the current study.

Effect of V. vermiformis inoculation into biofilms

Forty‐eight‐hour co‐culture of Lp and its FLA host, Vv, was introduced into biofilms based on previous studies indicating upregulation of Lp virulence after intra‐amoeba passage and during their co‐inoculations into mice (Brieland et al., 1996, 1997). Thus, it was hypothesized that increased colonization of DW biofilms could be a function of phenotypic changes induced during Lp passage and co‐culture with Vv hosts, which was exploited in this study. While Vv levels were relatively high and persistent within LpVv_RT biofilms, Lp levels in the same samples steadily decreased from day 4 to month 1, indicating parasitization and interactions with Vv did not sustain Lp levels at RT (Fig. 1C and D). This is supported by previous data stating that at < 20°C, L. pneumophila was actively digested and/or eliminated from the FLA, Acanthamoeba polyphaga, while at temperature above 25°C, the amoebae was parasitized by Lp (Ohno et al., 2008). Moreover, Vv cells were not detected past 1 week post‐inoculation at 37°C (Fig. 1D), while persistent Lp levels were observed in the LpVv_37°C biofilms (Fig. 1C), suggesting Lp biofilm colonization at this temperature was most likely not due to the presence of Vv cells. The qPCR detection of Lp only at month 6 (Fig. 1C, black arrow) and identification of Lp‐associated sequences at day 0, before LpVv inoculation and month 6 (Fig. 2B, red circle; 0.2% relative abundance) in Con_37°C biofilm samples may also be further indication that this temperature was amenable to Lp biofilm growth independent of Vv interactions. These results suggest that stable colonization of Vv within Cu DW biofilms may be strongly driven by temperature; however, the complete, initial parasitization of Vv cells at 37°C by Lp bacteria (and potentially other endemic biofilm amoebae) and their effect on Lp throughout the rest of the experiment cannot be excluded. Additionally, contrary to previous reports indicating the abundance of Vv in both chlorinated and chloraminated DW systems (Thomas et al., 2006; Corsaro et al., 2010; Valster et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2012), as well as within the building system used in this study (Buse et al., 2013), Vv cells were not detected in any of the control biofilm samples, which could indicate a preference for the bulk water phase and a need for high cellular densities for stable and persistent biofilm colonization.

Temperature and colonization of L. pneumophila and V. vermiformis are major drivers for overall biofilm community composition

Principal coordinate analysis, two‐way PERMANOVA, and NMDS analyses all indicated that temperature was the major driver of biofilm microbiome composition followed by LpVv colonization (Fig. S2, Table 2, and Fig. 3A, respectively). The communities inoculated with LpVv at RT and 37°C maintained a more stable composition, compared to control biofilms, based on their lower coefficient of variation as indicated in Figs 3 and 4B. FLA grazing on stream water‐derived biofilms and Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas fluorescens and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms were shown to alter overall morphology and microbial composition of their respective biofilms (Huws et al., 2005; Böhme et al., 2009). However, in this study, the predatory impact of Vv biofilm colonization on the bacterial community was not clear from the bacterial OTU distribution data especially given the fact that the actively feeding, trophozoite or metabolically dormant cyst forms cannot be distinguished using qPCR or sequencing analyses, nor were other amoebae investigated in this study. It must be noted that OTU 0023 was identified as Vv‐associated sequences (Figs 4C and 5C and D, green highlighted text), yet only 16S rRNA gene amplification was performed. Thus, the Vv‐associated sequences could have been derived either from intracellular bacterial organisms previously associated with Vv cells or from mitochondrial Vv sequences that were not taxonomically labelled as such and thus were not removed by mothur. This OTU was left in the analysis as it was one of the top 20 major OTU indicators of microbial composition (high relative abundance in LpVv_RT samples; Fig. 4C) and was previously associated with bacterial sequences derived from two different sources of groundwater (Pedersen et al., 1997; Benzine et al., 2013).

Notably, Mycobacterium avium, M. intracellulare and M. abscessus, other opportunistic water‐based pathogens, have been shown to readily adhere and stably colonize DW biofilms grown on glass, stainless steel, PVC and zinc‐galvanized steel coupons (Mullis and Falkinham, 2013). Their stable colonization and relatively high abundance within DW biofilms were supported in this study, for Cu surfaces, as Mycobacterium was found to be one of the top 20 indicator OTUs impacting overall diversity with relative abundance across all samples unaffected by temperature or LpVv colonization (Fig. 4C).

Although the water quality parameters collected weekly in this study corresponded to the influent water, and not water collected from within each reactor, several parameters that were shown to change significantly over the study period have been previously correlated with Legionella occurrence and abundance within DW systems [reviewed in Buse et al., 2012]. Specifically, DW containing > 50 μg Cu l−1, < 100 μg l−1 Zn, < 20 μg l−1 Fe and < 6 μg l−1 Mn was found to be protective against legionellae colonization, while in hot DW samples, the measured mean levels of DO (66%), TOC (6 ppm), Ca (25 mg l−1), sulfate (33 mg l−1) and nitrate (1 mg l−1) were positively correlated with Legionella densities (Buse et al., 2012). Moreover, variations in bulk DW community profiles have been associated with water quality parameters such as concentrations of disinfectant, phosphorus, sulfate and Mg (Ji et al., 2015). Thus, significant changes in the various influent water quality parameters measured in this study (Table 3), in concert with LpVv (and other possible micro‐eukaryotes) colonization, could have influenced biofilm microbiome composition throughout the study period. However, no statistical correlations could be drawn, as influent water was analysed rather than water collected from each CDC reactor; thus, future research will aim to address the putative importance of water quality on the biofilm microbiome.

Illumina sequencing of both bulk water and biofilm bacterial communities derived from chlorinated and chloraminated treated water was previously shown to be dominated by the phyla Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Gemmatimonadetes, Planctomyces and Proteobacteria (Pinto et al., 2012; Buse et al., 2014; Gomez‐Alvarez et al., 2014), which was similar to the results obtained in this study (Table 1). Compared to earlier DNA sequencing methods, such as Sanger‐based sequencing, there are an increasing number of studies utilizing next‐generation sequencing technology to improve sequencing depth to better characterize the complex microbial composition of DW biofilms. Nonetheless, both methods have been able to identify sequences associated with the genera Legionella, Mycobacteria and/or Pseudomonas within chlorinated and chloraminated DW‐derived biofilms grown on concrete/steel, Cu, cast iron, polycarbonate, PVC and SS surfaces (McBain et al., 2003; Zhang et al., 2012; Lin et al., 2013; Gomez‐Alvarez et al., 2014; Chao et al., 2015) indicating that DW biofilms may be a potential and continual source of environmental (water‐based) pathogens (Ashbolt, 2015).

Conclusion

Collectively, this study demonstrated that L. pneumophila can colonize mature DW biofilms grown on copper surfaces at relatively high pH levels (> pH 8.2) in which the antimicrobial properties of copper can be negatively impacted. Once incorporated, L. pneumophila may persist up to 1 month at cold‐water temperatures for premise plumbing (20°C) and up to 7 months at higher temperatures (37°C), which may pose a significant public health risk due to the extended colonization potential of these pathogens within premise plumbing. Temperature and inoculation of L. pneumophila and V. vermiformis were strong drivers of biofilm microbiome diversity, with major changes in bacterial composition between 1 and 7 months, compared to those between day 0 and 1 month. Notably, the aged copper used in this study did not universally exclude Legionella spp. nor L. pneumophila colonization, and V. vermiformis was not a prerequisite for proliferation or persistence of L. pneumophila. Moreover, L. pneumophila seemed to influence the presence and abundance of other Legionella spp., as well as other genera within the biofilm microbiome, further underscoring the need to elucidate L. pneumophila behaviour and their ecological role within mature DW biofilms in premise plumbing.

Experimental procedures

Bacterial and amoebal co‐culture preparation

Legionella pneumophila strain Chicago‐2 (Lp) is a clinical isolate derived from a human lung (American Type Culture Collection [ATCC] 33215), while Vvermiformis strain CDC‐19 (Vv) is an environmental isolate derived from a hospital cooling tower drain (ATCC 50237). Lp and Vv were grown and enumerated as previously described (Buse and Ashbolt, 2011). Briefly, Lp was grown overnight with continuous shaking at 37°C in buffered yeast extract (BYE) broth and Vv cells were grown as monolayers at 30°C in ATCC 1034 medium. Lp and Vv cultures were washed and diluted to desired concentrations in Page's amoeba saline (PAS). Lp densities, as measured by colony‐forming units (CFU), were determined by taking a small aliquot of the bacterial suspension, performing serial dilutions, and plating on buffered charcoal yeast extract (BCYE) agar plates (BD Diagnostics, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) which were incubated for 48 h at 37°C. Vv densities were enumerated using light microscopy and an improved Neubauer hemocytometer (Hausser Scientific, Horsham, PA, USA).

Previous studies indicated that during Lp infection of Vv cells, Lp densities peaked after 48 h of co‐culture (Buse and Ashbolt, 2011). Thus, for Lp and Vv inoculation into Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) biofilm reactors (Biosurface Technologies Corp., Bozeman, MT, USA), co‐cultures were prepared by washing overnight cultures of Lp and 7‐day‐old Vv cultures in PAS, co‐inoculating each into 75‐cm2 tissue culture flasks to generate a 15:1 bacteria‐to‐amoeba ratio (6.93 log10 CFU ml−1 of Lp and 5.74 log10 cells ml−1 of Vv), and incubating the flasks for 48 h at 32°C. After incubation, flasks were harvested and Lp and Vv enumerated as described above (7.27 log10 CFU ml−1 of Lp and 5.67 log10 cells ml−1 of Vv).

CDC biofilm reactor set‐up and sample collection

Four CDC biofilm reactors containing copper (Cu) coupons (surface area of 1.27 cm2) were fed with ambient (19.8 ± 0.8°C) DW from a light‐protected storage tank (23 l) at 150 ml h−1 (2.7‐h hydraulic residence time) using a peristaltic pump and Norprene™ food‐grade tubing (Cole Parmer, Vernon Hills, IL, USA). The Cu coupons used in this study were made from C10100 alloy (99.99% Cu), which is similar in composition to the Cu alloy C12200 used in Cu plumbing (99.9% Cu and silver combined and 0.015–0.04% phosphorus as per requirements of the American Society for Testing and Materials B88 Standard Specification for Seamless Copper Water Tube). In‐premise flow and stagnation periods were simulated by placing reactors on a magnetic stir plate set at approximately 100–125 rpm, which was activated for 30 min every 2 h [start to event 1 (E1)] and then every 2 h during a 10‐h window on weekdays [E1 to the inoculation event 2 (E2); Fig. S1]. Mature DW biofilms were allowed to establish on the Cu coupon surfaces for 510 days under ambient/room temperature (RT) conditions. At E1, temperatures within two of the four reactors, which served as control/mock‐inoculated (Con) and Lp and Vv (LpVv)‐inoculated reactors, were elevated to 37°C for the duration of the experiment (labelled Con_37°C and LpVv_37°C, respectively) with the two remaining reactors, designated Con_RT and LpVv_RT, maintained at RT. DW biofilms were then allowed to adjust to the new temperature conditions for 101 days before LpVv inoculation (E2). Prior to E2, duplicate coupons from each reactor were collected to record established biofilm characteristics [time 0 (T0)] as a baseline comparison to post‐inoculation samples (T1–T11).

For LpVv co‐culture inoculations (E2), reactors were disconnected from the peristaltic feed pump, with effluent lines clamped shut, and placed in a biological safety cabinet where the total DW volume was removed (approximately 400 ml) and replaced with 368 ml of 0.22 μm filtered, autoclaved tap water (fatH2O). The control reactors, Con_RT and Con_37°C, were inoculated with 32 ml fatH2O, while the LpVv_RT and LpVv_37°C reactors were inoculated with 32 ml of the LpVv co‐culture suspension prepared as described above. Reactors were replaced onto the magnetic stir plates and incubated at either RT or 37°C. Microbial adhesion was allowed to occur for 24 h with 30 min of mixing every 2 h. After the 24‐h incubation, each reactor was connected back to the peristaltic feed pump with effluent clamps released to allow flow. Two coupons (replicate 1, R1; and replicate 2, R2) were removed from each reactor at day 4 (T1), week 1 (T2), week 2 (T3), week 3 (T4) and month 1 (T5), 2 (T6), 3 (T7), 4 (T8), 5 (T9), 6 (T10) and 7 (T11) post‐inoculation (Fig. S1). Biofilms were collected from coupon surfaces as previously described (Buse et al., 2013b; Buse et al., 2014). Briefly, a sterile wooden stick was used to scrape the surface and was then rinsed in 300 μl of fatH2O. The coupon surface was washed twice with 100 μl fatH2O resulting in a final volume of 500 μl suspended biofilm material.

Water quality measurements

An aliquot of 250 ml of the tank water feeding the CDC reactors was sampled every week prior to and 7 months after Lp and Vv inoculation (n = 109 and 28 respectively). Water samples were analysed for free and total chlorine (Cl2), pH, temperature, conductivity, and per cent dissolved oxygen (DO; Table 3). The pH was measured using a glass electrode UltraBASIC‐10 meter (Denver Instrument, USA) and temperature, conductivity, and per cent dissolved oxygen using a YSI 566 Multi Probe System (YSI Environmental, Yellow Springs, OH, USA). Free and total Cl2 were measured using a TNT866 Chlorine Kit (Hach Company, Loveland, CO, USA) and the Hach® DR2800 spectrophotometer (Hach Company). An additional 550 ml of tank water was also submitted for weekly water quality analysis to assay total organic carbon (TOC; EPA Method 415.3 rev1.1), trace metals Cu, Fe, Mg, P, and Zn (EPA Method 200.7), phosphate (PO4; EPA Method 365.1), and nitrate (NO3; EPA Method 353.2) by the National Risk Management Research Laboratory at the US Environmental Protection Agency in Cincinnati, OH (Table 3).

DNA isolation and quantitative PCR

DNA was extracted from biofilm suspensions using the T&C buffer and MasterPure Complete DNA Purification Kit™ (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI, USA) as described previously (Buse et al., 2014). Biofilm DNA samples were analysed using the Applied Biosystems 7900 HT Fast Real‐Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Each sample was analysed in duplicate in a reaction mixture (20 μl final volume) containing the following: 1 × Power SYBR® Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems); 500 nM of each forward and reverse Lp‐specific primers targeting the sidF gene (Lu et al., 2013) or Vv‐specific primers targeting the 18S rRNA gene Hv1227/1728R (Kuiper et al., 2006); and 5 g bovine serum albumin. For Lp, the qPCR conditions consisted of an initial denaturation step of 10 min at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of 15 s at 95°C, 30 s at 64°C, and 30 s at 72°C with a final hold at 72°C for 2 min. For Vv, cycling conditions included pre‐denaturation at 95°C for 3 min, 40 cycles of 20 s at 95°C, 30 s at 56°C, and 40 s at 72°C with a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min. Fluorescent detection was performed at the annealing phase and during subsequent dissociation curve analysis to confirm that a single product had been amplified. TaqMan qPCR assay for Legionella spp. detection was performed using the 16S rRNA gene primers 16S‐LegF1c/16S‐LegR1c and probe 16S‐LegP1 (Lu et al., 2015). The cycling conditions consisted of a pre‐incubation step at 50°C for 2 min and a pre‐denaturation step at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 10 s, annealing at 50°C for 30 s, and extension at 70°C for 30 s.

All qPCR assays were performed in a 96‐well plate containing DNA standards and no‐template controls. The threshold cycles (Ct) were calculated using the sequence detection systems software v 2.3 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The reaction efficiency was calculated using the following equation: efficiency % = 100 × (10(–1/slope) – 1) (Applied Biosystems). Experiments were performed with undiluted and 10‐fold‐diluted template DNA in duplicate to verify the absence of qPCR inhibition. Data were expressed as cell equivalents (CE), based on culture densities (as measured by colony‐forming units), which were used to generate standard curves against the surface area of each reactor coupon (CE cm−2). All standards were generated in triplicate and the best‐fit standard curve used in data analysis. The limit of quantification (LOQ) for each qPCR assay was 1 log10 CE cm−2.

Illumina sequencing

Biofilm samples were subjected to PCR amplification using the universal bacterial/archaeal primer set F515 (5′ GTG CCA GCM GCC GCG GTA A 3′)/R806 (5′ GGA CTA CHV GGG TWT CTA AT 3′, barcoded, #0–95) targeting the V4 region of 16S rRNA gene, which was determined to yield optimal community clustering with this particular read length (Caporaso et al., 2011). Samples were prepared following the Earth Microbiome Project 16S rRNA Amplification Protocol version 4_13 (ftp://ftp.metagenomics.anl.gov/data/misc/EMP/SupplementaryFile1_barcoded_primers_515F_806R.txt) with the exceptions of using molecular biology grade water (Quality Biological, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) and the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Of the 96 biofilm samples, 90 were pooled on an equal molar basis (200 ng), and the remaining six samples with low‐yield PCR products were pooled based on ‘maximum volume’ criteria (maximum volume of the 90 samples, which is 50 μl). Paired‐end 250‐cycle Illumina sequencing was performed by the Genomics Research Laboratory at the Virginia Bioinformatics Institute (Blacksburg, VA, USA).

Sequence data analyses

Reads processing was performed using the software mothur v1.36.1 (https://www.mothur.org; Schloss et al., 2009) following the protocol of Kozich et al. (2013). Briefly, fastq files with forward and reverse reads were used to form contigs. Reads were screened and removed if they (i) had a length < 252 bp, (ii) contained ambiguous bases (Ns), (iii) contained homopolymers greater than seven bases, (iv) were identified as chimera, or (v) were classified as unknown, chloroplasts or mitochondria. Reads were aligned and grouped with 97% sequence identity as the cut‐off point for each operational taxonomic unit (OTU). Taxonomic classification was obtained using the Greengenes reference taxonomy database release gg_13_8_99. A total of 1 721 964 16S rRNA gene reads were analysed in this study. Prior to community analysis, samples were rarefied to the smallest data set of 9200 reads (Gihring et al., 2012). The Illumina reads have been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database BioProject number PRJNA214912: SRA accession #SAMN04528999‐SAMN04529093.

Statistical analysis

Means and standard error means were calculated using duplicate samples collected for all biofilm and effluent water sample types at each time point. Statistical significance for water quality parameters was determined using ANOVA followed by the Tukey post‐test (prism 6; GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Alpha diversity indices (supplemental information) and PERMANOVA of Illumina sequences were calculated using past version 2.03 (http://folk.uio.no/ohammer/past/; Hammer et al., 2001). A non‐metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination plot based on the Jensen–Shannon distance (JSD) was also generated using the past software with robustness of the ordination plot evaluated for goodness of fit using the Shepard diagram (Wickelmaier, 2003).

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

Supporting information

Fig. S1. Biofilm reactor set‐up and experimental timeline. Four CDC biofilm reactors were operated as described in Materials and Methods (A). Drinking water biofilms were allowed to develop on the copper (Cu) surfaces within all four reactors (START) for 510 days under ambient/room temperature (RT) conditions (B) before any manipulation of the reactors occurred. At event 1 (E1), temperatures within two of the reactors, that would serve as the control, mock‐inoculated (Con) and L. pneumophila and V. vermiformis (LpVv)‐inoculated reactors, were elevated to 37°C for the duration of the experiment (Con_37°C and LpVv_37°C, respectively). Biofilms were allowed 101 days to adjust to the temperature change before any further manipulation of the reactors occurred. Prior to inoculation, biofilm material was collected from duplicate Cu coupons from each reactor at T0. After T0 sampling, event 2 (E2) consisted of inoculating 48 h co‐cultures of Lp and Vv into reactors incubated at RT and 37°C, LpVv_RT and LpVv_37°C, respectively. Control reactors, incubated at RT and 37°C, were inoculated with sterile, co‐culture buffer (Con_RT and Con_37°C respectively). Biofilm material was collected from duplicate Cu coupons from each reactor at the time points indicated (B).

Fig. S2. Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) for sequences derived from biofilm samples. The PCoA graph indicates the contribution of temperature (x‐axis) and effect of inoculation (Con versus LpVv, y‐axis) on the overall variation of the biofilm reactor sequence libraries at each of the twelve time points.

Appendix S1. Diversity index formula and descriptions.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Ian T. Struewing and Sharon Yelton for their technical assistance with the daily operations of the CDC biofilm reactors. A portion of this effort was financially supported by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Microbiology of the Built Environment programme, National Science Foundation CBET award #1336650, Virginia Tech Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Science, and Alberta Innovates‐Health Solutions.

Microbial Biotechnology (2017) 10(4), 773–788

Funding Information

Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Microbiology of the Built Environment programme, National Science Foundation CBET award (1336650), Virginia Tech Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Science, and Alberta Innovates‐Health Solutions.

References

  1. Armon, R. , Starosvetzky, J. , Arbel, T. , and Green, M. (1997) Survival of Legionella pneumophila and Salmonella typhimurium in biofilm systems. Water Sci Technol 35: 293–300. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ashbolt, N.J. (2015) Environmental (saprozoic) pathogens of engineered water systems: understanding their ecology for risk assessment and management. Pathogens 4, 390–405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Benzine, J. , Shelobolina, E. , Xiong, M.Y. , Kennedy, D.W. , McKinley, J.P. , Lin, X. , and Roden, E.E. (2013) Fe‐phyllosilicate redox cycling organisms from a redox transition zone in Hanford 300 Area sediments. Front Microbiol 4: 388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berry, D. , Xi, C. , and Raskin, L. (2006) Microbial ecology of drinking water distribution systems. Curr Opin Biotechnol 17: 297–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Biurrun, A. , Caballero, L. , Pelaz, C. , Leon, E. , and Gago, A. (1999) Treatment of a Legionella pneumophila‐colonized water distribution system using copper‐silver ionization and continuous chlorination. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20: 426–428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Boe‐Hansen, R. , Albrechtsen, H.‐J. , Arvin, E. , and Jørgensen, C. (2002) Bulk water phase and biofilm growth in drinking water at low nutrient conditions. Water Res 36: 4477–4486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Böhme, A. , Risse‐Buhl, U. , and Kusel, K. (2009) Protists with different feeding modes change biofilm morphology. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 69: 158–169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brieland, J. , McClain, M. , Heath, L. , Chrisp, C. , Huffnagle, G. , LeGendre, M. , et al (1996) Coinoculation with Hartmannella vermiformis enhances replicative Legionella pneumophila lung infection in a murine model of Legionnaires’ disease. Infect Immun 64: 2449–2456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brieland, J.K. , Fantone, J.C. , Remick, D.G. , LeGendre, M. , McClain, M. , and Engleberg, N.C. (1997) The role of Legionella pneumophila‐infected Hartmannella vermiformis as an infectious particle in a murine model of Legionnaire's disease. Infect Immun 65: 5330–5333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Buse, H.Y. , and Ashbolt, N.J. (2011) Differential growth of Legionella pneumophila strains within a range of amoebae at various temperatures associated with in‐premise plumbing. Lett Appl Microbiol 53: 217–224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Buse, H.Y. , Schoen, M.E. , and Ashbolt, N.J. (2012) Legionellae in engineered systems and use of quantitative microbial risk assessment to predict exposure. Water Res 46: 921–933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Buse, H.Y. , Lu, J. , Struewing, I.T. , and Ashbolt, N.J. (2013a) Eukaryotic diversity in premise drinking water using 18S rDNA sequencing: implications for health risks. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 20: 6351–6366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Buse, H.Y. , Lu, J. , Struewing, I.T. , and Ashbolt, N.J. (2013b) Preferential colonization and release of Legionella pneumophila from mature drinking water biofilms grown on copper versus unplasticized polyvinylchloride coupons. Int J Hyg Environ Health 217: 219–225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Buse, H.Y. , Lu, J. , Lu, X. , Mou, X. , and Ashbolt, N.J. (2014) Microbial diversities (16S and 18S rRNA gene pyrosequencing) and environmental pathogens within drinking water biofilms grown on the common premise plumbing materials unplasticized polyvinylchloride and copper. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 88: 280–295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Caporaso, J.G. , Lauber, C.L. , Walters, W.A. , Berg‐Lyons, D. , Lozupone, C.A. , Turnbaugh, P.J. , et al (2011) Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108 (Suppl. 1): 4516–4522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chao, Y. , Mao, Y. , Wang, Z. , and Zhang, T. (2015) Diversity and functions of bacterial community in drinking water biofilms revealed by high‐throughput sequencing. Sci Rep 5: 10044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Collier, S.A. , Stockman, L.J. , Hicks, L.A. , Garrison, L.E. , Zhou, F.J. , and Beach, M.J. (2012) Direct healthcare costs of selected diseases primarily or partially transmitted by water. Epidemiol Infect 140: 2003–2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Corsaro, D. , Pages, G.S. , Catalan, V. , Loret, J.F. , and Greub, G. (2010) Biodiversity of amoebae and amoeba‐associated bacteria in water treatment plants. Int J Hyg Environ Health 213: 158–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Costerton, J.W. , Lewandowski, Z. , Caldwell, D.E. , Korber, D.R. , and Lappin‐Scott, H.M. (1995) Microbial biofilms. Annu Rev Microbiol 49: 1–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Council, N.R. (2006) Drinking Water Distribution Systems: Assessing and Reducing Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press. [Google Scholar]
  21. Dunne, W.M. Jr (2002) Bacterial adhesion: seen any good biofilms lately? Clin Microbiol Rev 15: 155–166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. ECDC (2016) European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Annual Epidemiological Report 2016 – Legionnaires’ Disease. [Internet – Cited 2016 09].
  23. Falkinham, J.O. 3rd , Norton, C.D. , and LeChevallier, M.W. (2001) Factors influencing numbers of Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare, and other Mycobacteria in drinking water distribution systems. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 1225–1231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Feazel, L.M. , Baumgartner, L.K. , Peterson, K.L. , Frank, D.N. , Harris, J.K. , and Pace, N.R. (2009) Opportunistic pathogens enriched in showerhead biofilms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 16393–16399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fields, B.S. , Sanden, G.N. , Barbaree, J.M. , Morrill, W.E. , Wadowsky, R.M. , White, E.H. , and Feeley, J.C. (1989) Intracellular multiplication of Legionella pneumophila in amoebae isolated from hospital hot water tanks. Curr Microbiol 18: 131–137. [Google Scholar]
  26. Garrison, L.E. , Kunz, J.M. , Cooley, L.A. , Moore, M.R. , Lucas, C. , Schrag, S. , et al (2016) Vital Signs: deficiencies in Environmental Control Identified in Outbreaks of Legionnaires’ Disease — North America, 2000–2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 65: 576–584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gihring, T.M. , Green, S.J. , and Schadt, C.W. (2012) Massively parallel rRNA gene sequencing exacerbates the potential for biased community diversity comparisons due to variable library sizes. Environ Microbiol 14: 285–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gomez‐Alvarez, V. , Schrantz, K.A. , Pressman, J.G. , and Wahman, D.G. (2014) Biofilm community dynamics in bench‐scale annular reactors simulating arrestment of chloraminated drinking water nitrification. Environ Sci Technol 48: 5448–5457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hammer, Ø. , Harper, D.A.T. , and Ryan, P.D. (2001) PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Paleontological Electronica 4: 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  30. Harb, O.S. , Gao, L.Y. , and Abu Kwaik, Y. (2000) From protozoa to mammalian cells: a new paradigm in the life cycle of intracellular bacterial pathogens. Environ Microbiol 2: 251–265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Henne, K. , Kahlisch, L. , Brettar, I. , and Höfle, M.G. (2012) Analysis of structure and composition of bacterial core communities in mature drinking water biofilms and bulk water of a citywide network in Germany. Appl Environ Microbiol 78: 3530–3538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Huws, S.A. , McBain, A.J. , and Gilbert, P. (2005) Protozoan grazing and its impact upon population dynamics in biofilm communities. J Appl Microbiol 98: 238–244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ji, P. , Parks, J. , Edwards, M.A. , and Pruden, A. (2015) Impact of water chemistry, pipe material and stagnation on the building plumbing microbiome. PLoS ONE 10: e0141087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. van der Kooij, D. , Veenendaal, H.R. , and Scheffer, W.J. (2005) Biofilm formation and multiplication of Legionella in a model warm water system with pipes of copper, stainless steel and cross‐linked polyethylene. Water Res 39: 2789–2798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kozich, J.J. , Westcott, S.L. , Baxter, N.T. , Highlander, S.K. , and Schloss, P.D. (2013) Development of a dual‐index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Appl Environ Microbiol 79: 5112–5120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kuiper, M.W. , Wullings, B.A. , Akkermans, A.D. , Beumer, R.R. , and van der Kooij, D. (2004) Intracellular proliferation of Legionella pneumophila in Hartmannella vermiformis in aquatic biofilms grown on plasticized polyvinyl chloride. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 6826–6833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kuiper, M.W. , Valster, R.M. , Wullings, B.A. , Boonstra, H. , Smidt, H. , and van der Kooij, D. (2006) Quantitative detection of the free‐living amoeba Hartmannella vermiformis in surface water by using real‐time PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 72: 5750–5756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lau, H.Y. , and Ashbolt, N.J. (2009) The role of biofilms and protozoa in Legionella pathogenesis: implications for drinking water. J Appl Microbiol 107: 368–378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lee, D.‐G. , Lee, J.‐H. , and Kim, S.‐J. (2005) Diversity and dynamics of bacterial species in a biofilm at the end of the Seoul water distribution system. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 21: 155–162. [Google Scholar]
  40. Lehtola, M.J. , Torvinen, E. , Kusnetsov, J. , Pitkanen, T. , Maunula, L. , von Bonsdorff, C.H. , et al (2007) Survival of Mycobacterium avium, Legionella pneumophila, Escherichia coli, and caliciviruses in drinking water‐associated biofilms grown under high‐shear turbulent flow. Appl Environ Microbiol 73: 2854–2859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Lin, Y.E. , Vidic, R.D. , Stout, J.E. , and Yu, V.L. (1996) Individual and combined effects of copper and silver ions on inactivation of Legionella pneumophila . Water Res 30: 1905–1913. [Google Scholar]
  42. Lin, Y.‐s.E. , Vidic, R.D. , Stout, J.E. and Yu, V.L. (2002) Negative effect of high pH on biocidal efficacy of copper and silver ions in controlling Legionella pneumophila , Appl Environ Microbiol 68: 2711–2715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Lin, Y.E. , Stout, J.E. , and Yu, V.L. (2011) Controlling legionella in hospital drinking water: an evidence‐based review of disinfection methods. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 32: 166–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lin, W. , Yu, Z. , Chen, X. , Liu, R. , and Zhang, H. (2013) Molecular characterization of natural biofilms from household taps with different materials: PVC, stainless steel, and cast iron in drinking water distribution system. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97: 8393–8401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lu, J. , Struewing, I. , Buse, H.Y. , Kou, J. , Shuman, H.A. , Faucher, S.P. , and Ashbolt, N.J. (2013) Legionella pneumophila transcriptional response following exposure to CuO nanoparticles. Appl Environ Microbiol 79: 2713–2720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lu, J. , Buse, H. , Gomez‐Alvarez, V. , Struewing, I. , Santo Domingo, J. , and Ashbolt, N.J. (2014) Impact of drinking water conditions and copper materials on downstream biofilm microbial communities and Legionella pneumophila colonization. J Appl Microbiol 117: 905–918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lu, J. , Struewing, I. , Yelton, S. , and Ashbolt, N. (2015) Molecular survey of occurrence and quantity of Legionella spp., Mycobacterium spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa and amoeba hosts in municipal drinking water storage tank sediments. J Appl Microbiol 119: 278–288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Martiny, A.C. , Jorgensen, T.M. , Albrechtsen, H.J. , Arvin, E. , and Molin, S. (2003) Long‐term succession of structure and diversity of a biofilm formed in a model drinking water distribution system. Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 6899–6907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Mathys, W. , Stanke, J. , Harmuth, M. , and Junge‐Mathys, E. (2008) Occurrence of Legionella in hot water systems of single‐family residences in suburbs of two German cities with special reference to solar and district heating. Int J Hyg Environ Health 211: 179–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. McBain, A.J. , Bartolo, R.G. , Catrenich, C.E. , Charbonneau, D. , Ledder, R.G. , Rickard, A.H. , et al (2003) Microbial characterization of biofilms in domestic drains and the establishment of stable biofilm microcosms. Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 177–185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Messi, P. , Anacarso, I. , Bargellini, A. , Bondi, M. , Marchesi, I. , de Niederhausern, S. , and Borella, P. (2011) Ecological behaviour of three serogroups of Legionella pneumophila within a model plumbing system. Biofouling 27: 165–172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Moritz, M.M. , Flemming, H.C. , and Wingender, J. (2010) Integration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Legionella pneumophila in drinking water biofilms grown on domestic plumbing materials. Int J Hyg Environ Health 213: 190–197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Morvay, A.A. , Decun, M. , Scurtu, M. , Sala, C. , Morar, A. , and Sarandan, M. (2011) Biofilm formation on materials commonly used in household drinking water systems. Water Sci Technol 11: 252–257. [Google Scholar]
  54. Mullis, S.N. , and Falkinham, J.O. 3rd (2013) Adherence and biofilm formation of Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare and Mycobacterium abscessus to household plumbing materials. J Appl Microbiol 115: 908–914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Murga, R. , Forster, T.S. , Brown, E. , Pruckler, J.M. , Fields, B.S. , and Donlan, R.M. (2001) Role of biofilms in the survival of Legionella pneumophila in a model potable‐water system. Microbiology 147: 3121–3126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Ohno, A. , Kato, N. , Sakamoto, R. , Kimura, S. , and Yamaguchi, K. (2008) Temperature‐Dependent Parasitic Relationship between Legionella pneumophila and a Free‐living Amoeba (Acanthamoeba castellanii). Appl Environ Microbiol 74: 4585–4588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Pedersen, K. , Hallbeck, L. , Arlinger, J. , Erlandson, A.‐C. , and Jahromi, N. (1997) Investigation of the potential for microbial contamination of deep granitic aquifers during drilling using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and culturing methods. J Microbiol Methods 30: 179–192. [Google Scholar]
  58. Pinto, A.J. , Xi, C. , and Raskin, L. (2012) Bacterial community structure in the drinking water microbiome is governed by filtration processes. Environ Sci Technol 46: 8851–8859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Rhoads, W.J. , Ji, P. , Pruden, A. , and Edwards, M.A. (2015) Water heater temperature set point and water use patterns influence Legionella pneumophila and associated microorganisms at the tap. Microbiome 3: 67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Rogers, J. , and Keevil, C.W. (1992) Immunogold and fluorescein immunolabelling of Legionella pneumophila within an aquatic biofilm visualized by using episcopic differential interference contrast microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol 58: 2326–2330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Rogers, J. , Dowsett, A.B. , Dennis, P.J. , Lee, J.V. , and Keevil, C.W. (1994) Influence of temperature and plumbing material selection on biofilm formation and growth of Legionella pneumophila in a model potable water system containing complex microbial flora. Appl Environ Microbiol 60: 1585–1592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Schloss, P.D. , Westcott, S.L. , Ryabin, T. , Hall, J.R. , Hartmann, M. , Hollister, E.B. , et al (2009) Introducing mothur: open‐source, platform‐independent, community‐supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 7537–7541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Shen, Y. , Huang, C. , Monroy, G.L. , Janjaroen, D. , Derlon, N. , Lin, J. , et al (2016) Response of simulated drinking water biofilm mechanical and structural properties to long‐term disinfectant exposure. Environ Sci Technol 50: 1779–1787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Thomas, V. , Herrera‐Rimann, K. , Blanc, D.S. , and Greub, G. (2006) Biodiversity of amoebae and amoeba‐resisting bacteria in a hospital water network. Appl Environ Microbiol 72: 2428–2438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Thomas, V. , Loret, J.F. , Jousset, M. , and Greub, G. (2008) Biodiversity of amoebae and amoebae‐resisting bacteria in a drinking water treatment plant. Environ Microbiol 10: 2728–2745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Valster, R.M. , Wullings, B.A. , and van der Kooij, D. (2010) Detection of protozoan hosts for Legionella pneumophila in engineered water systems by using a biofilm batch test. Appl Environ Microbiol 76: 7144–7153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Valster, R.M. , Wullings, B.A. , van den Berg, R. , and van der Kooij, D. (2011) Relationships between free‐living protozoa, cultivable Legionella spp., and water quality characteristics in three drinking water supplies in the Caribbean. Appl Environ Microbiol 77: 7321–7328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Wadowsky, R.M. , Butler, L.J. , Cook, M.K. , Verma, S.M. , Paul, M.A. , Fields, B.S. , et al (1988) Growth‐supporting activity for Legionella pneumophila in tap water cultures and implication of hartmannellid amoebae as growth factors. Appl Environ Microbiol 54: 2677–2682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Wang, H. , Edwards, M. , Falkinham, J.O. 3rd , and Pruden, A. (2012) Molecular Survey of the Occurrence of Legionella spp., Mycobacterium spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Amoeba Hosts in Two Chloraminated Drinking Water Distribution Systems. Appl Environ Microbiol 78: 6285–6294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Wickelmaier, F. (2003) An introduction to MDS. In: Reports from the Sound Quality Research Unit (SQRU), No. 7.
  71. Wilson, D.A. , Reischl, U. , Hall, G.S. , and Procop, G.W. (2007) Use of partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing for identification of Legionella pneumophila and non‐pneumophila Legionella spp. J Clin Microbiol 45: 257–258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Wingender, J. , and Flemming, H.C. (2004) Contamination potential of drinking water distribution network biofilms. Water Sci Technol 49: 277–286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Wullings, B.A. , and van der Kooij, D. (2006) Occurrence and genetic diversity of uncultured Legionella spp. in drinking water treated at temperatures below 15 degrees C. Appl Environ Microbiol 72: 157–166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Yamamoto, H. , Sugiura, M. , Kusunoki, S. , Ezaki, T. , Ikedo, M. , and Yabuuchi, E. (1992) Factors stimulating propagation of legionellae in cooling tower water. Appl Environ Microbiol 58: 1394–1397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Yu, J. , Kim, D. , and Lee, T. (2010) Microbial diversity in biofilms on water distribution pipes of different materials. Water Sci Technol 61: 163–171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Zhang, M. , Liu, W. , Nie, X. , Li, C. , Gu, J. , and Zhang, C. (2012) Molecular analysis of bacterial communities in biofilms of a drinking water clearwell. Microbes Environ 27: 443–448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Fig. S1. Biofilm reactor set‐up and experimental timeline. Four CDC biofilm reactors were operated as described in Materials and Methods (A). Drinking water biofilms were allowed to develop on the copper (Cu) surfaces within all four reactors (START) for 510 days under ambient/room temperature (RT) conditions (B) before any manipulation of the reactors occurred. At event 1 (E1), temperatures within two of the reactors, that would serve as the control, mock‐inoculated (Con) and L. pneumophila and V. vermiformis (LpVv)‐inoculated reactors, were elevated to 37°C for the duration of the experiment (Con_37°C and LpVv_37°C, respectively). Biofilms were allowed 101 days to adjust to the temperature change before any further manipulation of the reactors occurred. Prior to inoculation, biofilm material was collected from duplicate Cu coupons from each reactor at T0. After T0 sampling, event 2 (E2) consisted of inoculating 48 h co‐cultures of Lp and Vv into reactors incubated at RT and 37°C, LpVv_RT and LpVv_37°C, respectively. Control reactors, incubated at RT and 37°C, were inoculated with sterile, co‐culture buffer (Con_RT and Con_37°C respectively). Biofilm material was collected from duplicate Cu coupons from each reactor at the time points indicated (B).

Fig. S2. Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) for sequences derived from biofilm samples. The PCoA graph indicates the contribution of temperature (x‐axis) and effect of inoculation (Con versus LpVv, y‐axis) on the overall variation of the biofilm reactor sequence libraries at each of the twelve time points.

Appendix S1. Diversity index formula and descriptions.


Articles from Microbial Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES