Skip to main content
Microbial Biotechnology logoLink to Microbial Biotechnology
editorial
. 2017 Jun 14;10(4):671–673. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12723

Bioprospecting challenges in unusual environments

Kristie Tanner 1,2, Cristina Vilanova 1, Manuel Porcar 1,2
Editors: Eberhard Morgenroth, Hans‐Curt Flemming, Joana Azeredo, Luis F Melo, Manuel Espinosa, Marvin Whiteley, Romain Briandet
PMCID: PMC5481533  PMID: 28612429

The microbial ecology field is burgeoning. Year after year, improved sampling, culturing and bioinformatics tools contribute towards an apparently endless increase in microbial diversity. Massive access to genomic data and the development of single‐cell genomic techniques have re‐defined the tree of life by resolving many intra‐ and interphylum level relationships and by including dramatic expansions such as the discovery of a new subdivision in the bacterial domain of life, or an astounding 16‐fold increase in the number of known viral genes (Hug et al., 2011; Rinke et al., 2013; Paez‐Espino et al., 2016). Scaling law‐based calculations have led to the prediction that Earth is the home to more than 1 trillion microbial species (Locey and Lennon, 2016) let alone the intraspecies variation. This is indeed a huge number that may be better internalized with a simple calculation: if scientists were able to summarize in a one‐page genome paper each one of the bacterial species on our planet and piled the 1012 resulting pages one on top of another, the total height of the stacked articles would be 100 000 km, approximately a quarter of the distance from the Earth to the Moon. There is no doubt that we are dealing with a terrific amount of microbial diversity, and this puts on the table a double challenge: unveiling the myriad of microbial species still to be discovered and mining such a vast microbial diversity for novel biotechnological tools. Improving current methodologies for the analysis of omic data will be key to detect and identify novel species or gene sequences in massive datasets, whereas new culturing and screening techniques will be needed to exploit their industrial and biomedical applications (Vilanova and Porcar, 2016).

Microbial diversity is everything except random: microorganisms are the result of evolution and adaptation. This provides us with an incredible arsenal of unique and useful pre‐validated tools that can be used in a wide range of industrial applications. The search of these biological tools is what we know as bioprospecting, and it is nothing new. That said, past bioprospecting efforts have mainly focused on close, well‐known environments such as soil, a rich source of antibiotics (Sherpa et al., 2015) and bacteria with insecticidal properties (Melo et al., 2014); or human gut, from which probiotic bacteria such as Lactobacillus spp. can be isolated (Halimi and Mirsalehian, 2016). Nevertheless, exotic, particular environments result in particular adaptations, and the understandable ease with which human or humanized environments can be sampled should not mask that most taxonomic and functional novelties lay somewhere else. Unusual environments remain poorly or unexplored to date although they are certainly valuable sources of novel products. As illustrated by the popular illustration ‘Flammarion engraving’, there is a world, metaphorically, beyond those shining stars we can easily see (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Previous bioprospecting efforts have mainly focused on close environments, but beyond the comfort zone, there exist unexplored unusual niches that hold great promise as a source of biological variation that can have a key role in future biotechnological applications. The image is a collage created by blending bacterial colonies from solar panels (Dorado‐Morales et al., 2016) with an adapted version of the famous wood carving ‘Flammarion engraving’ (Flammarion, 1888).

But, what is an unusual environment, or, more precisely, what is unusual enough? We consider an unusual environment as one that is both poorly explored, taxonomically distant from the human‐associated microbiome and that is under extremophilic conditions. Interestingly, the three features tend to occur at the same time. It has to be stressed that some indoor or outdoor habitats (electrical appliances, sun‐exposed surfaces, high‐temperature saunas) fall in this category.

There are three reasons making unusual environments especially interesting for bioprospecting studies. The first one is the large biodiversity they harbour, leading to a high probability of finding new taxa, as exemplified by the discovery of as many as 47 new phyla in aquifer sediments and groundwater in Colorado (Anantharaman et al., 2016). Second, these microorganisms are pre‐adapted to stresses that often correlate with industrial needs. For example, sun‐exposed environments tend to be very rich in pigmented bacteria, such as carotenoid‐producing bacteria on solar panels or scytonemin‐producing bacteria in microbial communities from the Atacama Desert, both of these pigment types with important applications in the food, cosmetic and pharmacological industries thanks to their antioxidant and UV‐protection properties (Vítek et al., 2014; Rastogi et al., 2015; Dorado‐Morales et al., 2016). Finally, a promising research field lies on developing new biofactories from the robust microorganisms able to resist a wide range of stresses (temperature, pH, salinity, etc.). Indeed, bacterial chassis based on Deinococcus, Hymenobacter, Erythrobacter and Geobacillus species – commonly present in extreme environments like desert soils (Rainey et al., 2005), Antarctic environments (Hirsch et al., 2004; Kojima et al., 2016), spacecraft surfaces (Stepanov et al., 2014), the troposphere (DeLeon‐Rodriguez et al., 2013), solar salterns (Subhash et al., 2013) and mountain peaks (Marchant et al., 2002) – are already promising alternatives to classical E. coli models for synthetic biology (Gerber et al., 2015; Hussein et al., 2015).

Biotechnologists are indebted to thermostable polymerases, such as the immensely popular Taq polymerase for polymerase chain reactions (PCRs), as well as Vent or Pfu DNA polymerases, all of them isolated from the extremophilic thermophiles Thermus aquaticus, Thermococcus litoralis or Pyrococcus furiosus respectively (Chien et al., 1976; Tindall and Kunkel, 1988; Lundberg et al., 1991; Kong et al., 1993). There are many other examples of valuable products obtained from unusual environments: from silk from giant riverine orb spiders (Agnarsson et al., 2010), to biofuel from hyperthermophilic archaea living in deep‐sea hydrothermal vent chimneys (Nishimura and Sako, 2009), or latex‐degrading bacteria from pine‐tree forests (Vilanova et al., 2014). Moreover, the recent development of innovative approaches for the mining of microbial communities is resulting in the discovery of new molecules of outstanding interest. This is the case of Entotheonella spp., detected through single‐cell genomics approaches, and producing an unprecedented wide repertoire of bioactive compounds (Wilson et al., 2014), or the previously unculturable bacterium Eleftheria terrae, isolated from soil with innovative culturing approaches, and producer of the novel antibiotic teixobactin (Ling et al., 2015). It is reasonable that improving culturing techniques is first applied to well‐known environments, but they will only be fully exploited on ecologically more ambitious bioprospecting efforts.

Taken together, innovative approaches applied on exotic environments will be the major source of novel microorganisms and/or metabolites in the upcoming future. Taking into account that only a fraction of global microbial diversity has been explored to date (Locey and Lennon, 2016), the number of – yet to be discovered – strains, genetic tools or metabolites with biotechnological or biomedical applications is overwhelming. This opens a great market opportunity for the biotechnology industry and particularly for microbiology‐based enterprises. Highly specialized companies based on the bioprospecting of antibiotics (i.e. Prospective Research, Inc., Beverly, MA, USA) and bioactive molecules from the sea (i.e. Pharmamar, Madrid, Spain), and also new start‐up companies offering improved multi‐omic analysis (i.e. MicrobioMx, Barcelona, Spain) or improved culturing approaches (i.e. Darwin Bioprospecting Excellence) applied to any type of sample, are already part of the bioprospecting marketplace.

During the last two decades, the discovery of novel microbial compounds has declined significantly, mainly as a consequence of the genetic and chemical redundancy detected in commonly analysed environments (Zhang, 2005). Unusual environments hold great promise as unexploited, massively diverse targets for the discovery of biocompounds, microorganisms or consortia with potential commercial and/or industrial applications. We envisage xenomicrobial bioprospecting as revolutionary field for both microbial ecologists and entrepreneurs of tomorrow's bioeconomy.

References

  1. Agnarsson, I. , Kuntner, M. , and Blackledge, T.A. (2010) Bioprospecting finds the toughest biological material: extraordinary silk from a giant riverine orb spider. PLoS ONE 5: e11234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anantharaman, K. , Brown, C.T. , Hug, L.A. , Sharon, I. , Castelle, C.J. , Probst, A.J. , et al (2016) Thousands of microbial genomes shed light on interconnected biogeochemical processes in an aquifer system. Nat Commun 7: 13219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chien, A. , Edgar, D.B. , and Trela, J.M. (1976) Deoxyribonucleic acid polymerase from the extreme thermophile Thermus aquaticus . J Bacteriol 127: 1550–1557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DeLeon‐Rodriguez, N. , Lathem, T.L. , Rodriguez‐R, L.M. , Barazesh, J.M. , Anderson, B.E. , Beyersdorf, A.J. , et al (2013) Microbiome of the upper troposphere: species composition and prevalence, effects of tropical storms, and atmospheric implications. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 110: 2575–2580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dorado‐Morales, P. , Vilanova, C. , Peretó, J. , Codoñer, F.M. , Ramón, D. , and Porcar, M. (2016) A highly diverse, desert‐like microbial biocenosis on solar panels in a Mediterranean city. Sci Rep 6: 29235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Flammarion, C. (1888) L'atmosphère métérologie populaire. Paris: Hachette, p. 163. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gerber, E. , Bernard, R. , Castang, S. , Chabot, N. , Coze, F. , Dreux‐Zigha, A. , et al (2015) Deinococcus as new chassis for industrial biotechnology: biology, physiology and tools. J Appl Microbiol 119: 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Halimi, S. , and Mirsalehian, A. (2016) Assessment and comparison of probiotic potential of four Lactobacillus species isolated from feces samples of Iranian infants. Microbiol Immunol 60: 73–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hirsch, P. , Gallikowski, C.A. , Siebert, J. , Peissl, K. , Kroppenstedt, R. , Schumann, P. , et al (2004) Deinococcus frigens sp. nov., Deinococcus saxicola sp. nov., and Deinococcus marmoris sp. nov., Low Temperature and Draught‐tolerating, UV‐resistant Bacteria from Continental Antarctica. Syst Appl Microbiol 27: 636–645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hug, L.A. , Baker, B.J. , Anantharaman, K. , Brown, C.T. , Probst, A.J. , Castelle, C.J. , et al (2011) A new view of the tree of life. Nat Microbiol 1: 16048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hussein, A.H. , Lisowska, B.K. , and Leak, D.J. (2015) The genus geobacillus and their biotechnological potential. Adv Appl Microbiol 92: 1–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kojima, H. , Watanabe, M. , Tokizawa, R. , Shinohara, A. and Fukui, M. (2016) Hymenobacter nivis sp. nov., isolated from red snow in Antarctica. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66, 4821–4825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kong, H. , Kucera, R.B. , and Jack, W.E. (1993) Characterization of a DNA polymerase from the hyperthermophile Archaea Thermococcus litoralis . J Biol Chem 268: 1965–1975. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ling, L.L. , Schneider, T. , Peoples, A.J. , Spoering, A.L. , Engels, I. , Conlon, B.P. , et al (2015) A new antibiotic kills pathogens without detectable resistance. Nature 517, 455–459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Locey, K.J. , and Lennon, J.T. (2016) Scaling laws predict global microbial diversity. PNAS 113: 5970–5975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lundberg, K.S. , Shoemaker, D.D. , Adams, M.W. , Short, J.M. , Sorge, J.A. , and Mathur, E.J. (1991) High‐fidelity amplification using a thermostable DNA polymerase isolated from Pyrococcus furiosus . Gene 108: 1–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Marchant, R. , Banat, I.M. , Rahman, T.J. , and Berzano, M. (2002) The frequency and characteristics of highly thermophilic bacteria in cool soil environments. Environ Microbiol 4: 595–602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Melo, A.L.D. , Soccol, V.T. , and Soccol, C.R. (2014) Bacillus thuringiensis: mechanism of action, resistance and new applications: a review. Crit Rev Biotechnol 36: 317–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nishimura, H. and Sako, Y. (2009) Purification and characterization of the oxygen‐thermostable hydrogenase from the aerobic hyperthermophilic archaeon Aeropyrum camini . J Biosci Bioeng 108, 299–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Paez‐Espino, D. , Eloe‐Fadrosh, E.A. , Pavlopoulos, G.A. , Thomas, A.D. , Huntemann, M. , Mikhailova, N. , et al (2016) Uncovering Earth's virome. Nature 536: 425–430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rainey, F.A. , Ray, K. , Ferreira, M. , Gatz, B.Z. , Nobre, M.F. , Bagaley, D. , et al (2005) Extensive diversity of ionizing‐radiation‐resistant bacteria recovered from Sonoran desert soil and description of nine new species of the genus Deinococcus obtained from a single soil sample. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 5225–5235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rastogi, R.P. , Sonani, R.R. , and Madamwar, D. (2015) Cyanobacterial sunscreen scytonemin: role in photoprotection and biomedical research. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 176: 1551–1563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rinke, C. , Schwientek, P. , Sczyrba, A. , Ivanova, N.N. , Anderson, I.J. , Cheng, J. , et al (2013) Insights into the phylogeny and coding potential of microbial dark matter. Nature 499: 431–437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sherpa, R.T. , Reese, C.J. , and Montazaeri, A.H. (2015) Application of iChip to grow “uncultivable” microorganisms and its impact on antibiotic discovery. J Pharm Pharm Sci 18: 303–315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Stepanov, V.G. , Vaishampayan, P. , Venkateswaran, K. and Fox, G.E. (2014) Draft genome sequence of Deinococcus phoenicis, a novel strain isolated during the Phoenix Lander spacecraft assembly. Genome Announc 2, e00301‐14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Subhash, Y. , Tushar, L. , Sasikala, C. , and Ramana, C.V. (2013) Erythrobacter odishensis sp. nov. and Pontibacter odishensis sp. nov. isolated from dry soil of a solar saltern. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63: 4524–4532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tindall, K.R. , and Kunkel, T.A. (1988) Fidelity of DNA synthesis by the Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase. Biochemistry 27: 6008–6013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Vilanova, C. , and Porcar, M. (2016) Are multi‐omics enough? Nat Microbiol 1: 16101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Vilanova, C. , Marín, M. , Baixeras, J. , Latorre, A. , and Porcar, M. (2014) Selecting microbial strains from pine tree resin: biotechnological applications from a terpene world. PLoS ONE 9: e100740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Vítek, P. , Jehlička, J. , Ascaso, C. , Mašek, V. , Gómez‐Silva, B. , Olivares, H. , and Wierzchos, J. (2014) Distribution of scytonemin in endolithic microbial communities from halite crusts in the hyperarid zone of the Atacama Desert, Chile. FEMS Microb Ecol 90: 351–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wilson, M.C. , Mori, T. , Rückert, C. , Uria, A.R. , Helf, M.J. , Takada, K. , et al (2014) An environmental bacterial taxon with a large and distinct metabolic repertoire. Nature 506: 58–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhang, L. (2005) Integrated approaches for discovering novel drugs from microbial natural products. In Natural Products. Zhang L. and Demain A. L. (eds). New Jersey: Humana Press, pp. 33–55. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Microbial Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES