Abstract
Interferon tau (IFN-τ) is a ruminant-specific type I IFN secreted by a conceptus before its attachment to the uterus. IFN-τ induces the expression of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) via the type I IFN receptor (IFNAR), which is composed of IFNAR1 and IFNAR2 subunits in the endometrium. However, expression patterns of IFNARs during the estrous cycle have not been reported. We hypothesized that the response to a type I IFN changes along with IFNARs and the IFN-regulatory factors (IRFs) driving transcription of IFN signal-related genes and modulating a type I IFN signal during the estrous cycle. We investigated the estrous cycle stage-dependent type I IFN induction of ISGs and expression patterns of IFN signal-related genes in bovine endometrial tissues. Endometrial tissue pieces collected from bovine uteri at each estrous stage (early, mid, and late) were cultured with or without recombinant bovine IFN-α or concentrated pregnant uterine flushing (PUF) on day 18 after confirming the presence of a conceptus. IFN-α and PUF each significantly increased the expression of ISGs in endometrial tissues. The induction levels of the typical ISGs (MX1-a and ISG15) were significantly higher at the mid stage and correlated with high expression of IRFs at the mid stage. The immunostaining of IFNARs showed strong fluorescence intensities in luminal and glandular epithelia at the early and mid stages. Collectively, these results suggest that the endometrium exhibits estrous cycle stage-dependent responsiveness to type I IFN that may be associated with the expression of IFNARs and IRFs for pregnancy recognition.
Keywords: Cow, Interferon-stimulated gene (ISG), Type I Interferon (IFN), Type I interferon receptor (IFNAR), Uterus
Interferon tau (IFN-τ) is secreted by the conceptus of ruminants at the preimplantation stage [1,2,3,4]. IFN-τ is essential for pregnancy recognition in order to maintain the corpus luteum (CL). The CL is necessary for continuous production of progesterone during pregnancy. In the estrous cycle, the CL regresses, and this is followed by the next follicular phase because the CL secretes oxytocin, which binds to the oxytocin receptor expressed in the uterus and induces the CL regression factor: prostaglandin (PG) F2α [4, 5]. On the other hand, in the presence of a conceptus in the uterus, IFN-τ secreted by the conceptus inhibits the expression of oxytocin receptors. The synthesis of PGF2α is consequently inhibited, which prevents regression of the CL [4, 6]. Interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) are strongly expressed in the uterus at this time [7,8,9]. Because the production of IFN-τ is limited to days 14–21 of pregnancy in cows [10], the expression of bovine Myxovirus resistance (MX) genes, typical ISGs, decreases immediately after implantation is completed, on days 25–40 [11].
The expression of ISGs is induced by the ISGF3 complex, which consists of phosphorylated and dimerized signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 1/2 and IFN-regulatory factor (IRF) 9 in the IFN-stimulated Janus kinase (JAK)-STAT signaling pathway [12,13,14]. IFN-τ belongs to the type I IFN family, which includes IFN-α and -β, binds to type I IFN receptors (IFNARs) composed of IFNAR1 and IFNAR2 subunits [15], and subsequently activates the JAK/STAT signaling pathway [16, 17]. IFNAR1 and IFNAR2 mRNAs and proteins are strongly expressed in the endometrial luminal epithelium (LE), glandular epithelium (GE), and stromal cells in pregnant and nonpregnant ovine uteri [18]. However, only limited information is available on the expression of IFNAR in the bovine uterus. COP9 signalosome subunit 5 (COPS5)/Jun activation domain-binding protein 1—from a part of the COP9 signalosome complex that consists of eight subunits and plays a role in the ubiquitin proteasome system—was recently found to play a role in the inhibition of IFNAR1 proteolysis in human cells [19]. The data related to COPS5 in the bovine uterus have not been reported.
Type I IFN is generally induced by viral infections, and ISGs show antiviral activity [20]. The transcription of some type I IFNs—IFN-α and -β—is regulated by IRF3 and -7 [13, 14]. On the other hand, the transcription of IFN-τ is regulated by other transcription factors such as ETS2 [21], AP1 [22], CDX2 [23], DLX3 [24], and GATA2 [25]. IFN-τ and IFN-α differ in the transcription-regulatory mechanism even though they are both type I IFNs. The luteotropic activities of IFN-α and IFN-τ have been explored in previous studies. Intrauterine and intramuscular administration of recombinant bovine IFN-α to cows has been shown to reduce the oxytocin-induced release of PGF2α and to extend the lifespan of the CL [26,27,28]. Similarly, infusion of recombinant ovine IFN-τ or IFN-α to ewes extends the estrous cycle [29]. In vitro, recombinant bovine IFN-τ and IFN-α, recombinant ovine IFN-τ, and human IFN-α have been shown to suppress the synthesis of PGF2α in bovine and ovine endometrial cells [30, 31]. Thus, IFN-α and IFN-τ have antiluteolytic activities. A comparative analysis of gene expression profiles in the bovine endometrium between early pregnancy (days 15 and 18) and the intrauterine application of human IFN-α revealed similar and differential gene expression patterns, suggesting that IFN-τ-specific gene induction takes place in the endometrium at the preimplantation stage in the uterus [32]. The typical ISGs—MX1, MX2, and ISG15—are expressed in early pregnancy and after application of IFN-α and show similar gene expression patterns. It currently remains unknown whether IFN-τ-induced ISGs play roles in immune responses or have pregnancy recognition-specific functions in the uterus at the preimplantation stage.
Only ruminant-specific IFN-τ has antiluteolytic activities for pregnancy recognition between the mother and embryo [33]. However, not having antiluteolytic activities, other type I IFN such as porcine and equine IFN-δ or human and murine IFN-ε are expressed in the endometrium and trophoblast cells [34,35,36,37] and have been suggested to play roles in achieving a successful pregnancy. Additionally, the expression of genes IFNAR1, IFNAR2, and MxA shows similar changes in the endometrium during the menstrual cycle in humans [38]. We hypothesized that the estrous cycle stage-dependent responsiveness to type I IFN in the bovine endometrium is accompanied by a change in the expression of IFNARs and IRFs. In the present study, we investigated type I IFN-mediated induction of ISGs and expression patterns of IFN signal-related genes in bovine endometrial tissue at each estrous stage: early, mid, and late.
Materials and Methods
Collection of samples of endometrial tissues
This study was conducted in accordance with the Hokkaido University guidelines for the care and use of animals. Uteri collected from abattoirs were subdivided into three stages; early (days 4–9), mid (days 10–15), and late (days 16–21) according to the luteal stages of the ovary [39] as well as the status and electrical impedance of uterine mucus [40]. Intercaruncular endometrial tissues were collected from the uterine horn ipsilateral to the CL. The collected tissues were embedded in Optimal Cutting Temperature compound (Sakura Finetek, Tokyo, Japan) in liquid nitrogen, and stored in a freezer at –80°C until section preparation. Moreover, the collected tissues were used in expression analyses or explant cultures. Noncultured tissue samples were stored in a freezer at –80°C until RNA extraction. All the experiments were conducted on the tissue samples of at least three cows at each stage.
Uterine flushing and bovine recombinant IFN-α
Pregnant uterine flushing (PUF) was collected from a cow, confirming the existence of a conceptus on day 18 of pregnancy after embryo transfer on day 7 of the estrous cycle. Nonpregnant uterine flushing (NPUF) was collected from a cow confirmed to not have a conceptus after embryo transfer on day 7 of the estrous cycle. Approximately 2 l of each collected uterine flushing was filtered through gauze to remove cell debris. Then, the flushing was concentrated to 20 ml by means of a dialysis membrane (Size 36, Wako, Osaka, Japan) and dehydrated using polyethylene glycol 20,000 (Merck Schuchardt OHG, Hohenbrunn, Germany) at 4°C overnight. Concentrated uterine flushing was finally filtered through a 0.45-μm membrane, and then stored in a freezer at –80°C. Bovine recombinant IFN-α was kindly provided by Novartis (Novartis Animal Health, Basel, Switzerland).
The IFN-τ protein was detected in PUF by a western blot analysis. The antiviral activities of PUF and IFN-α were measured by a viral resistance assay using Madin-Darby bovine kidney cells and were found to be 82,620 IU/ml and 602,290 IU/ml, respectively. Five microliters of PUF or 0.5 μl of IFN-α was added to 1 ml of the medium, which was adjusted to approximately 400 IU/ml or 300 IU/ml. Five microliters of NPUF (the volume equivalent to that of PUF, 5 μl) was also added to the medium as a negative control.
Explant culture conditions
Collected tissues were placed in calcium- and magnesium-free Hanks’ balanced salt solution (HBSS) (–) and cut into small pieces (5 × 5 mm). These pieces were preincubated in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s medium – high glucose (DMEM, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 0.06 g/l penicillin G potassium (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) and 0.1 g/l streptomycin sulfate (Nacalai Tesque) at 38.5°C [41, 42] for 1 h at 5% of CO2. The medium volume was 2 ml in Falcon 35-mm Easy Grip Style Not Treated Bacteriological Petri Dishes, Sterile (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). After the preincubation, endometrial tissue pieces were cultured with nonsupplemented DMEM containing 10% (v/v) of fetal bovine serum (FBS, ICN Bio-Source International, Camarillo, CA, USA) (Cont.) or DMEM containing 10% of FBS and supplemented with IFN-α (300 IU/ml), PUF (400 IU/ml), or NPUF (5 μl/ml) for 12 or 24 h at 38.5°C and 5% CO2 in duplicate. The medium volume was 0.5 ml/well in Thermo Scientific™ Nunc™ Cell-Culture Treated Multidishes with 24 round wells (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Roskilde, Denmark). Cultured tissues were stored in a freezer at –80°C until RNA extraction.
RNA extraction and quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)
Total RNA was extracted from tissues homogenized using BioMasher® (Nippi, Tokyo, Japan) by NucleoSpin® RNA II (MACHEREY-NAGEL, Düren, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. All RNA samples were stored in a freezer at –80°C. Each RNA sample’s concentration was measured by spectrophotometry (NanoDrop ND-2000, Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA), and cDNA was synthesized from 0.2 μg of total RNA by reverse transcription using the ReverTra Ace® qPCR RT Master Mix (Toyobo Life Science, Osaka, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. PCR was run on an Astec Program Temp Control System (PC-815 or 816, Astec, Fukuoka, Japan). All cDNA samples were stored in a freezer at –30°C. Specific primers for MX1-a, MX1B, MX2, ISG15, IDO1, IFNAR2, COPS5, IRF1, IRF2, IRF3, IRF9, and H2AFZ were designed using Primer-BLAST (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/). Primer details are shown in Table 1. The relative expression levels of MX1-a, MX1B, MX2, ISG15, IFNAR1, IFNAR2, COPS5, IRF1, IRF2, IRF3, and IRF9 were assessed by qRT-PCR using a LightCycler® 480 System II (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) and THUNDERBIRDTM SYBR® qPCR Mix (Toyobo Life Science) added at the final concentration of each primer 0.5 μM. Thermal cycling conditions were 1 cycle at 95°C for 30 sec (denaturation), followed by 50 cycles at 95°C for 10 sec (denaturation), 55°C for 15 sec (primer annealing), and 72°C for 30 sec (extension). Relative mRNA abundance was calculated by the ΔΔCt method using the expression of H2AFZ as a reference gene.
Table 1. Information on primer sequences used for qRT-PCR.
| Gene | Sequence (5’-3’) | Accession No. | Product length (bp) |
| MX1-a | GCCAACTAGTCAGCACTACATTGTC | NM_173940.2 | 139 |
| GCTCTTGGACTCCATATCTTCAC | |||
| MX1B | GTGATATCTCCAACAGTGAAGC | AB_060169.1 | 94 |
| AACTGATTCGAGAAGCCAAG | |||
| MX2 | CAGAGACGCCTCAGTCGAAG | NM_173941.2 | 113 |
| GAGACGTTTGCTGGTTTCCATG | |||
| ISG15 | TGAGGGACTCCATGACGGTA | NM_174366.1 | 72 |
| GCTGGAAAGCAGGCACATTG | |||
| IFNAR1 | GCGAAGAGTTTCCGCAACAG | NM_174552.2 | 275 |
| TCCAAGGCAGGTCCAATGAC | |||
| IFNAR2 | TCGTATGTTGCGCCTGTTCT | NM_174553.2 | 231 |
| GTCCGTCGTGTTTACCCACA | |||
| COPS5 | GCCCTGGACTAAGGATCACC | NM_001192139.1 | 100 |
| TTCCAGGTTGCCTCCTGATC | |||
| IRF1 | CACAGTTCGCAGCTACATGG | NM_001191261.2 | 147 |
| AAGTTGTACAGGTCGCTGGT | |||
| IRF2 | GGAGCGTTGAAGGCAAACAG | NM_001205793.1 | 150 |
| AGGAGCTGTTGTAAGGCACC | |||
| IRF3 | GCTCAACTGACGGGAAGTGG | NM_001029845.3 | 116 |
| TGGTCTGGCCTAAGTGTTGG | |||
| IRF9 | CAGTTCCCAGGAGTGTGCTG | NM_001024506.1 | 125 |
| TATATCGCCCAGGCCTTGAA | |||
| H2AFZ | AGAGCCGGTTTGCAGTTCCCG | NM_174809.2 | 116 |
| TACTCCAGGATGGCTGCGCTGT | |||
Immunohistochemical analysis of frozen tissue slices
Frozen tissue slices were prepared and mounted on slides (Kenis, Osaka, Japan) using a Leica CM3050 S Research Cryostat (Leica Biosystems, Nussloch, Germany) and fixed in 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde in calcium- and magnesium-free phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (–) for 15 min. The samples were then washed three times with PBS (–) for 5 min and permeabilized by incubation with PBS (–) containing 0.2% (v/v) Triton X-100 (PBS-T) for 10 min. After three washes with PBS (–) for 5 min, the samples were blocked with 1% (w/v) BSA (Sigma) in PBS-T for 1 h. After three washes with PBS (–) for 5 min, the samples were incubated with a primary rabbit polyclonal antibody to IFNAR1 (sc-845, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) or IFNAR2 (GTX105770, GeneTex, CA, USA) diluted 1:500 with Solution A of Can Get Signal Immunostain Immunoreaction Enhance (Toyobo Life Science) at 4°C overnight. The samples were washed three times with PBS (–) for 5 min, and incubated for 1 h with a fluorescein-conjugated secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor® 568-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG antibody, A10042, Thermo Fisher Scientific, CA, USA) diluted 1:200 with Solution A of Can Get Signal Immunostain Immunoreaction Enhance (Toyobo Life Science). The samples were washed three times with PBS (–) for 5 min, covered with 10 μl of the mounting solution, Vectashield with DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA), and examined under a confocal microscope (Leica TCS SP5 II, Leica Biosystems).
Statistical analysis
All data are shown as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). The significance of differences was assessed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Fisher’s protected least-significant difference (PLSD) procedure as a multiple-comparison test in the StatView statistical analysis software (version 5; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Data with P values of < 0.05 were considered significant. P values of < 0.1 were assumed to indicate a slight difference.
Results
Induction of ISG mRNAs in mid-stage endometrial tissues cultured with IFN-α or PUF
PUF stimulated the expression of ISGs as well as IFN-α did. The expression of MX1-a and ISG15 significantly increased in tissues cultured for 12 and 24 h with IFN-α or PUF (Fig. 1A and D; P < 0.05). The expression of MX2 significantly increased in tissues cultured for 12 and 24 h with IFN-α or for 12 h with PUF (Fig. 1C; P < 0.05). The expression of MX1B significantly increased in tissues cultured for 12 h with IFN-α or PUF (Fig. 1B; P < 0.05). The expression of all ISGs was sufficiently induced in tissues cultured for 12 h with IFN-α or PUF, not with NPUF for 12 or 24 h.
Fig. 1.
Expression of ISGs in the bovine endometrium cultured with IFN-α, PUF, or NPUF at the mid stage of the estrous cycle. The vertical line shows the relative expression levels of mRNAs according to qRT-PCR, normalized to H2AFZ as a reference gene, while the horizontal axis indicates each culture condition for (A) MX1-a, (B) MX1B, (C) MX2, and (D) ISG15. Cont: nonsupplemented culture, IFN-α: addition of recombinant bovine IFN-α, PUF: addition of pregnant uterine flushing, and NPUF: addition of nonpregnant uterine flushing. All data are shown as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Letters (P < 0.05) indicate significant differences in each culture condition or at each culture time point according to ANOVA followed by Fisher’s PLSD procedure as a multiple-comparison test.
Expression of ISG mRNAs stimulated by IFN-α or PUF in endometrial tissues at each stage
In tissues cultured for 12 h, the magnitude of induction of MX1-a by PUF was significantly greater at the mid stage than at the early and late stages (Fig. 2A; P < 0.05). Additionally, the induction of MX1B by PUF and ISG15 by IFN-α or PUF was significantly stronger at the mid stage than at the late stage (Fig. 2B and D; P < 0.05). In spite of the absence of a significant difference, the expression of MX1-a under the influence of IFN-α from the mid to late stage and MX1B under the influence of PUF from the mid to early stage had a tendency to be high (Fig. 2A; P = 0.079, B; P = 0.085). No significant difference was observed in the expression of MX2 among tissues of all stages cultured for 12 h with IFN-α or PUF.
Fig. 2.
Expression of ISGs in bovine endometrial tissues cultured with IFN-α or PUF at different estrous stages. The vertical line shows the relative expression levels of mRNAs according to qRT-PCR, normalized to H2AFZ as a reference gene, while the horizontal axis indicates each culture condition and estrous stage for (A) MX1-a, (B) MX1B, (C) MX2, and (D) ISG15. IFN-α: addition of recombinant bovine IFN-α, PUF: addition of pregnant uterine flushing, E: early stage, M: mid stage, and L: late stage. All data are shown as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Letters (P < 0.05) indicate significant differences among stages according to ANOVA followed by Fisher’s PLSD procedure as a multiple-comparison test. The number sign (#) indicates the tendency (P < 0.1).
Changes in the expression of IFNAR1, IFNAR2, COPS5, IRF1, IRF2, IRF3, and IRF9 mRNAs during the estrous cycle
In noncultured tissues, IFNAR1, IFNAR2, and COPS5 mRNAs were strongly expressed at the early stage. The expression of IFNAR1 mRNA was slightly stronger at the early stage than at the mid stage (Fig. 3A; P = 0.057). The expression of IFNAR2 mRNA was significantly stronger at the early stage than at the other stages (Fig. 3B; P < 0.05). The expression of COPS5 mRNA was slightly stronger at the early stage than at the late stage (Fig. 3C; P = 0.093). IRF1, IRF2, IRF3, and IRF9 mRNAs were strongly expressed at the mid stage. The expression of IRF1 and IRF2 mRNAs was slightly stronger at the mid stage than at the early stage (Fig. 3D and E; P = 0.065 and 0.055). The expression of IRF2 and IRF3 mRNAs was significantly stronger at the mid stage than at the late stage (Fig. 3E and F; P < 0.05). The expression of IRF9 mRNA was significantly stronger at the mid stage than at the early and late stages (Fig. 3G; P < 0.05).
Fig. 3.
Expression of IFNAR1, IFNAR2, COPS5, IRF1, IRF2, IRF3, and IRF9 mRNAs in the bovine endometrium at different estrous stages. The vertical line shows the relative expression levels of mRNAs according to qRT-PCR, normalized to H2AFZ as a reference gene, while the horizontal axis indicates each estrous stage for (A) IFNAR1, (B) IFNAR2, (C) COPS5, (D) IRF1, (E) IRF2, (F) IRF3, and (G) IRF9. E: early stage, M: mid stage, and L: late stage. All data are shown as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Letters (P < 0.05) indicate significant differences among stages according to ANOVA followed by Fisher’s PLSD procedure as a multiple-comparison test. The number sign (#) indicates the tendency (P < 0.1).
Expression and localization of IFNAR1 and IFNAR2 proteins in endometrial tissues at each stage
IFNAR1 and IFNAR2 proteins were detected in the LE and GE in each tissue slice (Fig. 4A and Fig. 5A). The fluorescence intensities of IFNAR1 and IFNAR2 were strong at the early and mid stages and weak at the late stage. The localization of IFNAR1 in GE was clearer at the mid stage. The relative fluorescence intensities of IFNAR1 in LE and GE significantly decreased from the early to late stage (Fig. 4B and Fig. 5B; P < 0.05), whereas those of IFNAR2 in LE and GE remained stable from the early to mid stage and were slightly weaker at the late stage (Fig. 4C and Fig. 5C; P < 0.05 and P = 0.087).
Fig. 4.
Localization and relative expression of IFNAR1 and IFNAR2 in the luminal epithelium of the bovine endometrium at different estrous stages. Immunostaining images are shown at magnification × 20. The white scale bar is 250 μm. (A) The localization of IFNAR1 and IFNAR2 and merged images of DNA and each target protein in the luminal epithelium (LE). NC means incubation with PBS (–) instead of the primary antibody. (B and C) The relative fluorescence intensity of the target protein to each fluorescence intensity at the early stage, (B) IFNAR1 in LE, (C) IFNAR2 in LE. E: early stage, M: mid stage, and L: late stage. Graph data are shown as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Letters (P < 0.05) indicate significant differences among stages according to ANOVA followed by Fisher’s PLSD procedure as a multiple-comparison test.
Fig. 5.
Localization and relative fluorescence intensities of IFNAR1 and IFNAR2 in the glandular epithelium of the bovine endometrium at different estrous stages. Immunostaining images are shown at magnification × 20. The white scale bar is 250 μm. (A) The localization of IFNAR1 and IFNAR2 and merged images of DNA and each target protein in the glandular epithelium (GE) (A). NC means incubation with PBS (–) instead of the primary antibody. (B and C) The relative fluorescence intensity of the target protein toward each fluorescence intensity at the early stage, (B) IFNAR1 in GE, (C) IFNAR2 in GE. E: early stage, M: mid stage, and L: late stage. Graph data are shown as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Letters (P < 0.05) indicate significant differences among stages according to ANOVA followed by Fisher’s PLSD procedure as a multiple-comparison test. The number sign (#) indicates the tendency (P < 0.1).
Discussion
The present study demonstrated that the type I IFN response is strong at the mid stage of the estrous cycle according to the induction levels of ISG mRNAs in endometrial tissues cultured with a type I IFN. Additionally, this result was associated with the expression of IFNARs and IRFs in the endometrium. These data suggest that the endometrium at the mid stage of the estrous cycle requires specific conditions to respond to IFN-τ for pregnancy recognition between a mother and fetus in cows.
In other studies, IFN-τ has been detected in the PUF of cows, whereas other type I IFNs were not [43, 44]. Sakurai et al. [45] applied PUF as an alternative to IFN-τ and reported promotion of the processes of attachment of bovine trophoblast cells to endometrial epithelial cells, thereby mimicking the uterine environment at the peri-implantation stage in vivo. In the present study, the bovine endometrial reaction to a type I IFN was investigated by the experimental method of an explant culture with the PUF.
We initially attempted the explant culture at IFN-α concentrations of 300 IU/ml and 3000 IU/ml at the mid stage (when pregnancy recognition occurs), as reported previously for a bovine embryo culture [46], and evaluated the relative expression of ISGs (MX1-a and MX1B) in cultured tissues. Both concentrations similarly induced MX1-a and MX1B mRNA expression (Supplementary Fig. 1: online only). These results indicate the absence of significant differences in type I IFN induction levels within an antiviral activity range between 300 IU/ml and 3000 IU/ml. PUF and IFN-α both sufficiently stimulated the expression of ISGs in the tissues cultured for 12 h (Fig. 1). Accordingly, we compared the expression of ISGs in tissues cultured for 12 h with PUF or IFN-α at each stage: the early, mid, and late stages.
In tissues cultured with PUF or IFN-α, the expression of MX1-a, MX1B, and ISG15 was high at the mid stage (Fig. 2A, B and D). MX and ISG genes have been shown to suppress viral proliferation in the innate immune system [14, 47, 48]. When progesterone is dominantly produced in livestock, the suppression of immune functions in the uterus enhances the risk of uterine infection [49]. In humans, progesterone was found to suppress IFN-α-induced MxA expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells infected with hepatitis C virus [50]. ISGs may prevent infection at the preimplantation stage.
The expression of IFNAR1 and IFNAR2 mRNAs was strong at the early stage (Fig. 3A and B). A small amount of IFN-τ is known to be produced in vitro by hatched blastocysts (days 8–10) [51]. IFN-τ-mediated signal transduction prior to the peak in IFN-τ production may be necessary for achieving a successful pregnancy. The results of the immunohistochemical analysis showed strong fluorescence intensities of IFNAR1 and IFNAR2 from the early to mid stage and their weak intensities at the late stage (Figs. 4 and Fig. 5). Furthermore, the IFNAR1 protein was clearly localized to the cytoplasm or cell membrane in GE at the mid stage; therefore, the IFNAR1 protein may be more functional at the mid stage. In addition, the expression of COPS5 decreased slightly from the early to late stage (Fig. 3C). COPS5 has been shown to stabilize IFNAR1 protein levels by regulating ubiquitination and degradation [19]. These findings suggest that IFNAR is strongly expressed at the early stage because the uterus needs to prepare to respond to IFN-τ for pregnancy recognition at the mid stage. On the other hand, in the absence of a conceptus, the IFNAR protein is degraded from the mid to late stage.
All IRF genes were strongly expressed at the mid stage (Fig. 3D–G). IRF1 regulates DNA damage and apoptosis in addition to activating immune responses including type I IFN signaling [13, 52]. One study suggested that IFN-τ induces apoptosis in bovine endometrial cells [53]. IRF1 activates the induction of IFN-τ-stimulated genes and may regulate the apoptosis in the endometrium for uterine tissue remodeling at the peri-implantation stage. IRF2 has been shown to inhibit the type I IFN signaling pathway [13, 54]. It may also suppress excessive responses to a type I IFN in the endometrium because a successful pregnancy requires immune tolerance. IRF3 is a transcriptional regulator of IFN-α and -β in the innate immune system [13, 14]. This observation suggests that not only the production of IFN-τ but also the expression of type I IFNs such as IFN-α and -β in maternal uterine tissues is necessary for pregnancy recognition. IRF9 drives the transcription of ISGs [13, 14]. The strong expression of IRF9 at the mid stage may enable endometrial tissues to positively respond to IFN-τ, and consequently, the expression of MX1-a, MX1B, and ISG15 is strong at the mid stage. As described above, IRF genes may be involved in the type I IFN response for pregnancy recognition; in particular, the expression of IRF1 and IRF9 is more important than that of IFNAR because they serve as the activator and transcription factor in type I IFN signaling after binding of IFN-τ to IFNAR.
In conclusion, herein we demonstrated that the endometrium responds to a type I IFN specifically at the mid stage of the estrous cycle. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to examine stage-dependent differences in the induction of ISGs by a type I IFN in bovine endometrial tissue. The expression of IFNARs and IRFs is key to the type I IFN response in the bovine endometrium during the estrous cycle. These results suggest that the bovine endometrium prepares for pregnancy recognition via IFN-τ and easily responds to IFN-τ at the mid stage. ISGs induced by IFN-τ may play important roles in the endometrium for successful implantation, for example, protection from viral and other infections.
Supplementary
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (KAKENHI, 15H04579) and partially by the Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development (RDA, PJ01029304). The authors are grateful to Dr Keisuke Sasaki, a doctoral research fellow at Tokyo University of Agriculture for his helpful guidance and discussions on this study and also thank members of the Field Center for Northern Biosphere, Hokkaido University, for their help with cow handling and sampling.
References
- 1.Imakawa K, Anthony RV, Kazemi M, Marotti KR, Polites HG, Roberts RM. Interferon-like sequence of ovine trophoblast protein secreted by embryonic trophectoderm. Nature 1987; 330: 377–379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Roberts RM, Cross JC, Leaman DW. Interferons as hormones of pregnancy. Endocr Rev 1992; 13: 432–452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Roberts RM, Leaman DW, Cross JC. Role of interferons in maternal recognition of pregnancy in ruminants. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1992; 200: 7–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Demmers KJ, Derecka K, Flint A. Trophoblast interferon and pregnancy. Reproduction 2001; 121: 41–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Flint AP, Sheldrick EL, McCann TJ, Jones DS. Luteal oxytocin: characteristics and control of synchronous episodes of oxytocin and PGF2 alpha secretion at luteolysis in ruminants. Domest Anim Endocrinol 1990; 7: 111–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Flint AP, Lamming GE, Stewart HJ, Abayasekara DR. The role of the endometrial oxytocin receptor in determining the length of the sterile oestrous cycle and ensuring maintenance of luteal function in early pregnancy in ruminants. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1994; 344: 291–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ott TL, Yin J, Wiley AA, Kim HT, Gerami-Naini B, Spencer TE, Bartol FF, Burghardt RC, Bazer FW. Effects of the estrous cycle and early pregnancy on uterine expression of Mx protein in sheep (Ovis aries). Biol Reprod 1998; 59: 784–794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hicks BA, Etter SJ, Carnahan KG, Joyce MM, Assiri AA, Carling SJ, Kodali K, Johnson GA, Hansen TR, Mirando MA, Woods GL, Vanderwall DK, Ott TL. Expression of the uterine Mx protein in cyclic and pregnant cows, gilts, and mares. J Anim Sci 2003; 81: 1552–1561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mansouri-Attia N, Aubert J, Reinaud P, Giraud-Delville C, Taghouti G, Galio L, Everts RE, Degrelle S, Richard C, Hue I, Yang X, Tian XC, Lewin HA, Renard JP, Sandra O. Gene expression profiles of bovine caruncular and intercaruncular endometrium at implantation. Physiol Genomics 2009; 39: 14–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ealy AD, Yang QE. Control of interferon-tau expression during early pregnancy in ruminants. Am J Reprod Immunol 2009; 61: 95–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shirozu T, Sasaki K, Kawahara M, Yanagawa Y, Nagano M, Yamauchi N, Takahashi M. Expression dynamics of bovine MX genes in the endometrium and placenta during early to mid pregnancy. J Reprod Dev 2016; 62: 29–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Darnell JE, Jr, Kerr IM, Stark GR. Jak-STAT pathways and transcriptional activation in response to IFNs and other extracellular signaling proteins. Science 1994; 264: 1415–1421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Taniguchi T, Ogasawara K, Takaoka A, Tanaka N. IRF family of transcription factors as regulators of host defense. Annu Rev Immunol 2001; 19: 623–655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Schneider WM, Chevillotte MD, Rice CM. Interferon-stimulated genes: a complex web of host defenses. Annu Rev Immunol 2014; 32: 513–545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Li J, Roberts RM. Interferon-tau and interferon-alpha interact with the same receptors in bovine endometrium. Use of a readily iodinatable form of recombinant interferon-tau for binding studies. J Biol Chem 1994; 269: 13544–13550. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Binelli M, Subramaniam P, Diaz T, Johnson GA, Hansen TR, Badinga L, Thatcher WW. Bovine interferon-tau stimulates the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription pathway in bovine endometrial epithelial cells. Biol Reprod 2001; 64: 654–665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Spencer TE, Sandra O, Wolf E. Genes involved in conceptus-endometrial interactions in ruminants: insights from reductionism and thoughts on holistic approaches. Reproduction 2008; 135: 165–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rosenfeld CS, Han CS, Alexenko AP, Spencer TE, Roberts RM. Expression of interferon receptor subunits, IFNAR1 and IFNAR2, in the ovine uterus. Biol Reprod 2002; 67: 847–853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Muromoto R, Nakajima M, Hirashima K, Hirao T, Kon S, Shimoda K, Oritani K, Matsuda T. Jun activation domain-binding protein 1 (JAB1) is required for the optimal response to interferons. J Biol Chem 2013; 288: 30969–30979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Samuel CE. Antiviral actions of interferons. Clin Microbiol Rev 2001; 14: 778–809. table of contents. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ezashi T, Ealy AD, Ostrowski MC, Roberts RM. Control of interferon-tau gene expression by Ets-2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 7882–7887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yamaguchi H, Ikeda Y, Moreno JI, Katsumura M, Miyazawa T, Takahashi E, Imakawa K, Sakai S, Christenson RK. Identification of a functional transcriptional factor AP-1 site in the sheep interferon tau gene that mediates a response to PMA in JEG3 cells. Biochem J 1999; 340: 767–773. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Imakawa K, Kim MS, Matsuda-Minehata F, Ishida S, Iizuka M, Suzuki M, Chang KT, Echternkamp SE, Christenson RK. Regulation of the ovine interferon-tau gene by a blastocyst-specific transcription factor, Cdx2. Mol Reprod Dev 2006; 73: 559–567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ezashi T, Das P, Gupta R, Walker A, Roberts RM. The role of homeobox protein distal-less 3 and its interaction with ETS2 in regulating bovine interferon-tau gene expression-synergistic transcriptional activation with ETS2. Biol Reprod 2008; 79: 115–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bai H, Sakurai T, Kim MS, Muroi Y, Ideta A, Aoyagi Y, Nakajima H, Takahashi M, Nagaoka K, Imakawa K. Involvement of GATA transcription factors in the regulation of endogenous bovine interferon-tau gene transcription. Mol Reprod Dev 2009; 76: 1143–1152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Plante C, Thatcher WW, Hansen PJ. Alteration of oestrous cycle length, ovarian function and oxytocin-induced release of prostaglandin F-2 alpha by intrauterine and intramuscular administration of recombinant bovine interferon-alpha to cows. J Reprod Fertil 1991; 93: 375–384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Plante C, Hansen PJ, Martinod S, Siegenthaler B, Thatcher WW, Pollard JW, Leslie MV. Effect of intrauterine and intramuscular administration of recombinant bovine interferon alpha 1 on luteal lifespan in cattle. J Dairy Sci 1989; 72: 1859–1865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Plante C, Hansen PJ, Thatcher WW. Prolongation of luteal lifespan in cows by intrauterine infusion of recombinant bovine alpha-interferon. Endocrinology 1988; 122: 2342–2344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Green MP, Spate LD, Bixby JA, Ealy AD, Roberts RM. A comparison of the anti-luteolytic activities of recombinant ovine interferon-alpha and -tau in sheep. Biol Reprod 2005; 73: 1087–1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Godkin JD, Smith SE, Johnson RD, Doré JJ. The role of trophoblast interferons in the maintenance of early pregnancy in ruminants. Am J Reprod Immunol 1997; 37: 137–143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Salamonsen LA, Manikhot J, Healy DL, Findlay JK. Ovine trophoblast protein-1 and human interferon alpha reduce prostaglandin synthesis by ovine endometrial cells. Prostaglandins 1989; 38: 289–306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bauersachs S, Ulbrich SE, Reichenbach HD, Reichenbach M, Büttner M, Meyer HH, Spencer TE, Minten M, Sax G, Winter G, Wolf E. Comparison of the effects of early pregnancy with human interferon, alpha 2 (IFNA2), on gene expression in bovine endometrium. Biol Reprod 2012; 86: 46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Roberts RM, Cross JC, Leaman DW. Unique features of the trophoblast interferons. Pharmacol Ther 1991; 51: 329–345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lefèvre F, Guillomot M, DAndréa S, Battegay S, La Bonnardière C. Interferon-delta: the first member of a novel type I interferon family. Biochimie 1998; 80: 779–788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cochet M, Vaiman D, Lefèvre F. Novel interferon delta genes in mammals: cloning of one gene from the sheep, two genes expressed by the horse conceptus and discovery of related sequences in several taxa by genomic database screening. Gene 2009; 433: 88–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fung KY, Mangan NE, Cumming H, Horvat JC, Mayall JR, Stifter SA, De Weerd N, Roisman LC, Rossjohn J, Robertson SA, Schjenken JE, Parker B, Gargett CE, Nguyen HP, Carr DJ, Hansbro PM, Hertzog PJ. Interferon-ε protects the female reproductive tract from viral and bacterial infection. Science 2013; 339: 1088–1092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hermant P, Francius C, Clotman F, Michiels T. IFN-ε is constitutively expressed by cells of the reproductive tract and is inefficiently secreted by fibroblasts and cell lines. PLoS ONE 2013; 8: e71320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ozaki T, Takahashi K, Kanasaki H, Iida K, Miyazaki K. Expression of the type I interferon receptor and the interferon-induced Mx protein in human endometrium during the menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril 2005; 83: 163–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ireland JJ, Murphee RL, Coulson PB. Accuracy of predicting stages of bovine estrous cycle by gross appearance of the corpus luteum. J Dairy Sci 1980; 63: 155–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Fisher AD, Morton R, Dempsey JM, Henshall JM, Hill JR. Evaluation of a new approach for the estimation of the time of the LH surge in dairy cows using vaginal temperature and electrodeless conductivity measurements. Theriogenology 2008; 70: 1065–1074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Takahashi H, Inumaru S, Takahashi M, Watanabe S, Iga K, Yokomizo Y, Geshi M, Okano A, Okuda K. Biological activity of recombinant bovine interferon tau using an Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus expression system. J Reprod Dev 2003; 49: 433–440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Woclawek-Potocka I, Borkowski K, Korzekwa A, Okuda K, Skarzynski DJ. Phyto- and endogenous estrogens differently activate intracellular calcium ion mobilization in bovine endometrial cells. J Reprod Dev 2006; 52: 731–740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Romero JJ, Antoniazzi AQ, Nett TM, Ashley RL, Webb BT, Smirnova NP, Bott RC, Bruemmer JE, Bazer FW, Anthony RV, Hansen TR. Temporal release, paracrine and endocrine actions of ovine conceptus-derived interferon-tau during early pregnancy. Biol Reprod 2015; 93: 146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Forde N, McGettigan PA, Mehta JP, OHara L, Mamo S, Bazer FW, Spencer TE, Lonergan P. Proteomic analysis of uterine fluid during the pre-implantation period of pregnancy in cattle. Reproduction 2014; 147: 575–587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sakurai T, Bai H, Bai R, Arai M, Iwazawa M, Zhang J, Konno T, Godkin JD, Okuda K, Imakawa K. Coculture system that mimics in vivo attachment processes in bovine trophoblast cells. Biol Reprod 2012; 87: 60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Takahashi M, Takahashi H, Hamano S, Watanabe S, Inumaru S, Geshi M, Okuda K, Yokomizo Y, Okano A. Possible role of interferon-tau on in vitro development of bovine embryos. J Reprod Dev 2003; 49: 297–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lenschow DJ, Giannakopoulos NV, Gunn LJ, Johnston C, OGuin AK, Schmidt RE, Levine B, Virgin HW., 4th. Identification of interferon-stimulated gene 15 as an antiviral molecule during Sindbis virus infection in vivo. J Virol 2005; 79: 13974–13983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Staeheli P, Horisberger MA, Haller O. Mx-dependent resistance to influenza viruses is induced by mouse interferons alpha and beta but not gamma. Virology 1984; 132: 456–461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lewis GS. Steroidal regulation of uterine resistance to bacterial infection in livestock. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2003; 1: 117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Tayel SS, Helmy AA, Ahmed R, Esmat G, Hamdi N, Abdelaziz AI. Progesterone suppresses interferon signaling by repressing TLR-7 and MxA expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients infected with hepatitis C virus. Arch Virol 2013; 158: 1755–1764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hernandez-Ledezma JJ, Sikes JD, Murphy CN, Watson AJ, Schultz GA, Roberts RM. Expression of bovine trophoblast interferon in conceptuses derived by in vitro techniques. Biol Reprod 1992; 47: 374–380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Tanaka N, Ishihara M, Kitagawa M, Harada H, Kimura T, Matsuyama T, Lamphier MS, Aizawa S, Mak TW, Taniguchi T. Cellular commitment to oncogene-induced transformation or apoptosis is dependent on the transcription factor IRF-1. Cell 1994; 77: 829–839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wang B, Xiao C, Goff AK. Progesterone-modulated induction of apoptosis by interferon-tau in cultured epithelial cells of bovine endometrium. Biol Reprod 2003; 68: 673–679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Whiteside ST, King P, Goodbourn S. A truncated form of the IRF-2 transcription factor has the properties of a postinduction repressor of interferon-beta gene expression. J Biol Chem 1994; 269: 27059–27065. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.





