Skip to main content
PMC home page
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2017 Jun 20;8:15944. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15944

Microscopic origins of the large piezoelectricity of leadfree (Ba,Ca)(Zr,Ti)O3

Yousra Nahas 1,a, Alireza Akbarzadeh 1, Sergei Prokhorenko 1, Sergey Prosandeev 1,2, Raymond Walter 1, Igor Kornev 3, Jorge Íñiguez 4, L Bellaiche 1
PMCID: PMC5481827  PMID: 28631724

Abstract

In light of directives around the world to eliminate toxic materials in various technologies, finding lead-free materials with high piezoelectric responses constitutes an important current scientific goal. As such, the recent discovery of a large electromechanical conversion near room temperature in (1−x)Ba(Zr0.2Ti0.8)O3−x(Ba0.7Ca0.3)TiO3 compounds has directed attention to understanding its origin. Here, we report the development of a large-scale atomistic scheme providing a microscopic insight into this technologically promising material. We find that its high piezoelectricity originates from the existence of large fluctuations of polarization in the orthorhombic state arising from the combination of a flat free-energy landscape, a fragmented local structure, and the narrow temperature window around room temperature at which this orthorhombic phase is the equilibrium state. In addition to deepening the current knowledge on piezoelectricity, these findings have the potential to guide the design of other lead-free materials with large electromechanical responses.

(Ba,Ca)(Zr,Ti)O3 ceramics have attracted interest as lead-free materials with large piezoelectric responses. Here, the authors use an atomistic model to show the electromechanical properties are due to a complex microstructure and polarization fluctuations in the narrowly stable orthorhombic phase.

Piezoelectricity is a physical phenomenon that converts mechanical into electrical energy and vice-versa (see ref. 1 and references therein). It has been used for devices such as sensors, actuators or ultrasonic motors2,3. Up to now, the materials exhibiting the highest piezoelectric responses include lead ions, such as Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 or Pb(Mg,Nb,Ti)O3 (refs 4, 5, 6, 7, 8), that introduce toxicity concerns. As a result, the search for lead-free compounds exhibiting large room-temperature piezoelectricity constitutes an important current research direction that is partially driven by regulations announced by several countries9,10. In that regard, the discovery of a large electromechanical response found at room temperature in the (1−x)Ba(Zr0.2Ti0.8)O3−x(Ba0.7Ca0.3)TiO3 solid solutions with x=0.50 (to be denoted as BCTZ-0.5 in the following) and reported in ref. 11 is a major finding.

Interestingly, the microscopic origin of such large piezoelectricity in this lead-free system remains subject to debate. For instance, the experimental study of ref. 11 suggests that it arises from the proximity of a tricritical point, where two ferroelectric phases of rhombohedral and tetragonal symmetries meet with the paraelectric phase of cubic symmetry. In contrast, the combined theoretical and experimental investigation of ref. 12 proposes that the highest piezoelectric coefficients are reached at the boundary between ferroelectric phases of orthorhombic and tetragonal symmetries as a result of a combination of reduced anisotropy energy, high polarization and enhanced elastic softening. The experimental analyses of refs 13, 14 offer yet another explanation, pointing out the coexistence of tetragonal, orthorhombic and rhombohedral phases and the strong electric-field-dependency of their relative contributions to the total system as the culprits responsible for the large observed electromechanical response. On the basis of the polarization-rotation mechanism proposed in lead-based materials4,15,16,17,18, it is also legitimate to wonder if an overlooked low-symmetry phase, inside which the spontaneous polarization easily rotates, may be responsible for large piezoelectricity in (Ba0.85Ca0.15)(Zr0.10Ti0.90)O3.

A plausible explanation for the paucity of knowledge of BCTZ-0.5 is that atomistic simulations, which have been particularly important to understand piezoelectricity in lead-based materials15,16,17,18, are currently lacking for (1−x)Ba(Zr0.2Ti0.8)O3−x(Ba0.7Ca0.3)TiO3 compounds. This lack of simulations is likely due to the difficulty in realistically mimicking these latter solid solutions, since not only do they possess chemical mixing at both the A and B sublattices of the ABO3 perovskite structure, but can also exhibit local inhomogeneities (especially if phase coexistence occurs as advocated in refs 13, 14). As a result, large supercells are most likely required to accurately model BCTZ-0.5, which is typically problematic from the standpoint of memory and computational time.

Here, we build a large-scale atomistic approach to tackle room-temperature piezoelectricity in (Ba0.85Ca0.15)(Zr0.10Ti0.90)O3. The use of such a scheme leads to a successful explanation of its origin that we find residing in the dyadic combination of the narrow temperature range of stability of the macroscopic orthorhombic phase near 300 K, and the flatness of the free energy associated with this orthorhombic phase, which allows large fluctuations of the polarization around its equilibrium value. Such macroscopic effects are also associated with specific characteristics of the local structures, including the existence of the so-called percolating cluster (which is of orthorhombic symmetry) while its strength (that is, volume per cent occupied in the material) is found here to directly correlate with piezoelectricity. It is also worth realizing that clusters of orthorhombic symmetry are not ingredients of the widely used Comes–Guinier–Lambert19, which implies that this model ought to be generalized to be more realistic.

Results

Atomistic scheme

We adopt the virtual crystal approximation (VCA)20,21 mimic (1−x)Ba(Zr0.2Ti0.8)O3−x(Ba0.7Ca0.3)TiO3 with x=0.50. We first model a virtual 〈A〉〈B〉O3 simple perovskite system, for which the 〈A〉 atom involves a compositional average of Ba and Ca potentials of 85 and 15% respective contributions, while the 〈B〉 atom is built from a mixing of the Zr and Ti potentials of 10 and 90% respective contributions. An effective Hamiltonian (Heff) is then developed for this 〈A〉〈B〉O3 system. As in ref. 22, the degrees of freedom of this Heff are, for each 5-atom unit cell i, the local soft mode ui that is proportional to the electric dipole moment of the cell, the ηH homogeneous strain tensor, and inhomogeneous-strain-related dimensionless displacements {vi}. Technically, the various {ui} and {vi} are, respectively, centred on the 〈B〉 and 〈A〉 sites. The analytical expression for the total internal energy of this effective Hamiltonian is the one provided in ref. 22 for pure BaTiO3, and therefore contains a local-mode self-energy, a long-range dipole–dipole interaction, a short-range interaction between soft modes, an elastic energy, and an interaction between the local modes and local strains. In particular, the local-mode self-energy is given by:

graphic file with name ncomms15944-m1.jpg

where the sum runs over all the 〈B〉 sites and where (ui,x, ui,y, ui,z) are the Cartesian components of ui in the orthonormal basis formed by the [100], [010] and [001] pseudo-cubic directions. In the first step, the parameters κ2, α and γ are determined, along with the other coefficients of the effective Hamiltonian, by performing density functional theory calculations within the VCA approach21 on small 〈A〉〈B〉O3 cells (less than 20 atoms). In a second step, Monte-Carlo (MC) simulations using Etot are conducted on large supercells (typically of 12 × 12 × 12 or 18 × 18 × 18 dimensions) made of 〈A〉〈B〉O3. During these simulations, κ2 is varied to fit the experimental value of the Curie temperature11,12,23 (since Heff techniques can underestimate the paraelectric–ferroelectric transition temperature22,24) and γ is slightly adjusted to reproduce the measured lowest transition temperature observed in refs 12, 23 for (1−x)Ba(Zr0.2Ti0.8)O3−x(Ba0.7Ca0.3)TiO3 solid solutions having x=0.50. For comparison, we also computed finite-temperature properties of pure BaTiO3 (BTO), as arising from the use of the effective Hamiltonian of ref. 24.

Phase transitions

The results of these MC simulations for BCTZ-0.5 and BTO are shown in Fig. 1a,b for the Cartesian components of the supercell average of the local modes, 〈u〉 (which is directly proportional to the spontaneous polarization), when averaging over 4 million MC sweeps and using 18 × 18 × 18 supercells. The x, y and z axes are chosen along the [100], [010] and [001] pseudo-cubic directions, respectively. The computations for BCTZ-0.5 correctly qualitatively and even quantitatively reproduce the three observed successive (first-order) transitions12,23 when cooling down the system: first, a paraelectric cubic PmInline graphicm to ferroelectric tetragonal P4mm transition at around 360 K, for which the z component of 〈u〉 becomes nonzero; second, a P4mm to ferroelectric orthorhombic Amm2 transition near 297 K (that is, very close to room temperature), for which the y component of the supercell average of the local modes suddenly becomes nonzero and equal to the z component; and third, a Amm2 to ferroelectric rhombohedral R3m transition at ≃270 K, for which all the Cartesian components of 〈u〉 are now nonzero and equal to each other. In Supplementary Note 2, it is also demsonstrated that the effective Hamiltonian scheme used within the VCA approach (with a rescaling of the κ2 and γ parameters) can correctly reproduce the temperature–compositional phase diagram of (1−x)Ba(Zr0.2Ti0.8)O3−x(Ba0.7Ca0.3)TiO3 (BCTZ-x) for x ranging between 0.25 and 0.65, as well as other properties of BCTZ-x, which further attests to the validity of the presently used numerical method. Moreover, for pure BaTiO3, Fig. 1b shows that the PmInline graphicm−P4mm, P4mm−Amm2 and Amm2−R3m transitions are predicted to be about 384, 283 and 226 K, which agree reasonably well with the corresponding experimental values of 400, 280 and 180 K (refs 25, 26).

Figure 1. Temperature dependence of macroscopic properties.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a,b) Report the evolution with temperature T of the supercell average of the local modes (in lattice constant units) of (1−x)Ba(Zr0.2Ti0.8)O3−x(Ba0.7Ca0.3)TiO3 with x=0.50 (BCTZ-0.5) and BaTiO3 (BTO), respectively. Error bars indicate s.d., and are less than or equal to the size of the points when not visible. (c,d) Show the evolution with temperature T of the average 〈dave〉 piezoelectric coefficient (see text) for BCTZ-0.5 and BTO, respectively. Note that 〈dave〉 reaches values larger than 1,000 at the PmInline graphicm−P4mm, P4mm−Amm2 and Amm2−R3m transitions. Such values are not shown here because they will make it challenging to see piezoelectricity of the order of hundreds of pC/N in c,d. Results in all panels are obtained from the use of 18 × 18 × 18 supercells.

Piezoelectricity

Piezoelectric coefficients, dij, of BCTZ-0.5 and BTO are calculated using the correlation-function approach of ref. 27, that is:

graphic file with name ncomms15944-m4.jpg

where T is the temperature, kB the Boltzmann constant, Ns the total number of 5-atom cells composing the supercell, Z* the Born effective charge associated with the soft mode and a the 5-atom lattice constant. ui is the i-component of the supercell average of the local mode at a given MC sweep, and ηH,j is the j component of the homogeneous strain tensor (in Voigt notation) at this MC sweep. The 〈〉 symbol denotes statistical averages over the different MC sweeps. Figure 1c,d report an averaged computed piezoelectric coefficient, 〈dave〉, for BCTZ-0.5 and BaTiO3, respectively. More precisely, 〈dave〉 is equal to Inline graphic (for the aforementioned (x, y, z) basis) in the R3m phase, since d11, d22 and d33 coefficients are all nonzero and equal to each other in this phase. On the other hand, 〈dave〉 is chosen to be Inline graphic (respectively, d11+d22+d33) in the Amm2 (P4mm) phase because only two (one) of these three coefficients are (is) nonzero there. We also practically choose 〈dave〉 to be equal to d11+d22+d33 in the paraelectric phase, as in the tetragonal ferroelectric state (note that all three aforementioned choices provide the same 〈dave〉 in the PmInline graphicm phase since it has no piezoelectricity).

In BCTZ-0.5, large values of this piezoelectric coefficient exist in the temperature range associated with the stability of the Amm2 phase, as consistent with the experimental findings of refs 11, 12. In particular, the computed averaged 〈dave〉 coefficient is always bigger than ≃225 pC/N and can be as high as 525 pC/N in the macroscopic Amm2 phase of BCTZ-0.5 (note that piezoelectric coefficients larger than 525 pC/N shown in Fig. 1c correspond to frequent fluctuations between different macroscopic phases, such as Amm2 and P4mm, and are therefore inherently linked to phase transitions). In contrast, the piezoelectric coefficient can be as small as ≃150 pC/N and does not exceed values of about ≃330 pc/N in the macroscopic Amm2 state of BaTiO3. Interestingly and unlike in lead-based Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 and Pb(Mg,Nb,Ti)O3 solid solutions near their morphotropic phase boundary4,15,16, these large piezoelectric responses in BCTZ-0.5 are not due to the existence of a low-symmetry (that is, monoclinic) phase that is associated with the ease of rotating the polarization, since our calculations reported in Fig. 1a (as well as corresponding data related to strain tensors that are not shown here) indicate that they occur within a macroscopic orthorhombic phase.

It is also worthwhile to realize that Fig. 1c further predicts that BCTZ-0.5 should also have large piezoelectric coefficients (larger than 200 pC/N) in the rhombohedral R3m phase in the vicinity of the Amm2–R3m phase transition, namely for temperature varying between 260 and 266 K, as well as close to the Curie temperature of ≃360 K, which is consistent with the experimental data of ref. 12.

Fluctuations

To better understand the piezoelectric responses within the Amm2 phases of BCTZ-0.5 and BTO, as well as their differences and origins, Fig. 2a reports 〈dave〉 versus Inline graphic in the ferroelectric orthorhombic state of these two materials, where δuy and δuz are the error bars that are associated with the y and z components of the supercell average of the local mode that are shown in Fig. 1a,b. These error bars quantify the fluctuation of the polarization about its macroscopic average, which is oriented along the [011] direction. What is remarkable is that not only 〈dave〉 is found to nearly linearly increase with Inline graphic, but also that this linear relationship is rather similar between BCTZ-0.5 and BaTiO3 (Supplementary Note 3 provides an understanding of the linear relationship between 〈dave〉 and Inline graphic. We did not include δux in the computation of the fluctuations reported in the horizontal axis of Fig. 2a because the polarization in the orthorhombic phase has a vanishing x component). One can thus assert that BCTZ-0.5, in contrast with BTO, can adopt values of 〈dave〉 larger than 330 pc/N in its Amm2 state because it can sustain larger fluctuations of its polarization. Moreover, unlike BaTiO3, BCTZ-0.5 is prevented from having piezoelectric coefficients smaller than 225 pC/N because the narrow temperature stability of its macroscopic Amm2 phase (about 30 K in BCTZ-0.5 versus 60 K in BTO, see Fig. 1a,b) prevents the orthorhombic symmetry from reaching lower temperatures where thermal fluctuations are restricted. Note that the inherent relation between a limited temperature range of stability of the orthorhombic phase and large piezoelectricity is further demonstrated in the Supplementary Note 2, where we also examined BCTZ-0.4. As a matter of fact, in this latter system, the range of stability of its orthorhombic state further contracted (about 15 K), which results in even larger piezoelectric coefficients. However, such range of stability in BCTZ-0.4 occurs for temperatures higher than 300 K, which is detrimental to generate high room-temperature electromechanical response.

Figure 2. Dependence of piezoelectricity on fluctuations and percolation.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) Reports the dependency of the average 〈dave〉 piezoelectric coefficient (see text) on fluctuations of the polarization in the macroscopic Amm2 phase of (1−x)Ba(Zr0.2Ti0.8)O3−x(Ba0.7Ca0.3)TiO3 with x=0.50 (BCTZ-0.5) in yellow symbols, and BaTiO3 (BTO) in red symbols. δuy and δuz are the error bars of the y and z component of the supercell average of the local mode, respectively, displayed in Fig. 1a,b. (b) Shows the dependency of the average 〈dave〉 piezoelectric coefficient on the Inline graphic strength of the percolating O cluster (that is, the infinite cluster that spreads from one side of the supercell to its opposite side along the [100], [010] or [001] pseudo-cubic directions36) in the macroscopic Amm2 phase of BCTZ-0.5 (yellow symbols) and BTO (red symbols). Results correspond to the use of a 18 × 18 × 18 supercell. Solid lines are linear least-square fits in a, and guide for the eyes in b.

To understand the larger fluctuations occurring in the orthorhombic phase of BCTZ-0.5 with respect to the case of BaTiO3, Fig. 3 displays a quantity related to free energy–internal energy of both systems at their P4mm–Amm2 transition, as obtained using the Wang-Landau algorithm of ref. 28 within the effective Hamiltonians presently developed and/or used here. More precisely, this quantity related to free energy corresponds to the logarithm of the canonical probability function28. Figure 3 demonstrates the existence of two minima of similar free energy in both systems. The right minimum with larger internal energies corresponds to the macroscopic P4mm state while the left minimum with smaller internal energies is associated with Amm2. The existence of these two minima demonstrates the first-order character of the P4mm–Amm2 transition. Figure 3 also indicates that the energetic barrier between these two minima is smaller in BCTZ-0.5 than in BTO, therefore making the exploration of different orthorhombic states of different polarization direction, via an intermediate tetragonal state, easier of access close to the P4mm–Amm2 transition in (Ba0.85Ca0.15)(Zr0.10Ti0.90)O3 than in BaTiO3. This finding is fully consistent with the suggestion of ref. 11 that BCTZ-0.5 possesses a low energetic barrier between different ferroelectric states that allows its polarization to easily rotate and that results in large piezoelectric responses very near the P4mm–Amm2 transition. Furthermore and understand Figs 2a and 3 also reveals that the free energy–internal energy curve is much flatter around the orthorhombic minimum in BCTZ-0.5 than in BTO. In other words, there is a wider range of orthorhombic states having different internal energies (and thus different magnitudes of the polarization) that hold a similar free-energy in BCTZ-0.5. As a result, BCTZ-0.5 can exhibit larger fluctuations of its polarization within the macroscopic Amm2 phase. Note also that the existence of a low free-energy barrier and of flat minima revealed in Fig. 3 for BCTZ-0.5 is consistent with the proximity of a tricritical point in the phase diagram of (1−x)Ba(Zr0.2Ti0.8)O3−x(Ba0.7Ca0.3)TiO3, as discussed in ref. 11 (see Supplementary Note 2 for our predictions and discussion about tricritical point in this solid solution).

Figure 3. Free-energy landscape.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Free-energy-like quantity versus internal energy (in meV per 5-atom cell) for (1−x)Ba(Zr0.2Ti0.8)O3−x(Ba0.7Ca0.3)TiO3 with x=0.50 (BCTZ-0.5) in yellow, and BaTiO3 (BTO) in red, at their P4mm–Amm2 transition temperatures (which are 297 and 283 K, respectively). Results correspond to the use of a 18 × 18 × 18 supercell. This free-energy-like quantity is the logarithm of the normalized canonical distribution28.

Cluster analysis

Let us now determine whether the piezoelectric response and polarization’s fluctuations of BCTZ-0.5 and BTO correlate with microscopic features. For that, we identified clusters of tetragonal (T), Orthorhombic (O) and Rhombohedral (R) symmetry (within which dipoles nearly all lie along a 〈001〉, 〈110〉 and 〈111〉 pseudo-cubic direction, respectively) in both BCTZ-0.5 and BaTiO3, using a modified version of the Hoshen–Kopelman algorithm29,30. Interestingly, we numerically found (not shown here) that both systems support T, O and R clusters in their macroscopic P4mm state; this is reminiscent of the coexistence of P4mm, Amm2 and R3m phases close to the P4mm–Amm2 transition, reported in ref. 13 based on a Rietveld analysis of X-ray powder diffraction for a (Ba0.85Ca0.15)(Zr0.10Ti0.90)O3 sample. Moreover, while our T clusters fully vanish in the Amm2 state of these two materials, the O and R clusters remain, which bears resemblance with the decrease of the per cent of P4mm phase experimentally reported in refs 13, 14 when subjecting BCTZ-0.5 to electric field or stress near room temperature. These changes in microstructures are associated with the huge piezoelectric response found at the P4mm–Amm2 transition occurring between 296 and 298 K. Furthermore, our findings about local clusters demonstrate that the microscopic and macroscopic symmetries of BaTiO3, but also of BCTZ-0.5, can be quite different, which is in line with the celebrated Comes–Guinier–Lambert model19. On the other hand, our predictions of the existence of T clusters (in the P4mm phases) and O clusters (in both the P4mm and Amm2 phases) in addition to R clusters are in line with the findings of ref. 31 and go beyond the Comes–Guinier–Lambert model, since this latter model only expects R clusters (with different 〈111〉 directions) to occur in the macroscopic P4mm and Amm2 phases.

Let us focus on the macroscopic orthorhombic Amm2 phase of both BCTZ-0.5 and BTO since we are interested in relating its large piezoelectric coefficients displayed in Fig. 1c with atomistic characteristics. In this phase, we numerically found that the R clusters are dynamical in nature32, since they can change of location within the supercell and can also jump from one 〈111〉 direction to another 〈111〉 direction between different MC sweeps. Note that jump of polarization is typically associated with the so-called central mode, as demonstrated in ref. 33 for pure BaTiO3. On the other hand, we further discovered that there are two different types of O clusters in the macroscopic orthorhombic Amm2 phase of BCTZ-0.5 and BaTiO3. One type has a strong dynamical character as a result of the different 〈110〉 directions and locations within the supercell it can adopt during the MC simulations at fixed temperature. On the other hand, the second type of O clusters has a pronounced static character in the sense that its polarization is always oriented along the spontaneous polarization. However, this second type of cluster also possesses some dynamics, that is, it breathes rather than change location during these simulations, which may be related to the soft-mode that has been predicted and observed to exist (in addition to the central mode) in BTO33,34. As a result, such second type of O cluster can be referred to as quasi-static (it is worthwhile to realize that our simulations thus show that both quasi-static and dynamical clusters can coexist inside a pure system, such as BaTiO3, and not only in complex solid solutions such as relaxor ferroelectrics35). Interestingly, this quasi-static type of O cluster is, in fact, the so-called percolating cluster that spreads from one side of the supercell to its opposite side along the [100], [010] or [001] pseudo-cubic directions36.

To corroborate these observations, we have conducted additional molecular dynamics simulations so as to estimate the relative time-scale of cluster dynamics in BCTZ-0.5 within the orthorhombic phase, at 280 K. We found that the polarization of the percolating O cluster does not change orientation throughout the 400 ps total simulation time, thus being indeed quasi-static at these time scales accessible to molecular dynamics simulations. Moreover, we found that the autocorrelation time of the volume of the non-percolating O clusters is of ∼1.4 ps, while for the percolating O cluster, it is of ∼2.3 ps, hence indicating that the latter, while featuring significantly slower dynamics nevertheless has a breathing component to its time evolution, essentially due to volume fluctuations. Examples of R clusters, as well as the two types of O clusters, are shown in Fig. 4e,f for both BCTZ-0.5 and BaTiO3. Figure 4a–d indicate the relative evolution with temperature of different types of clusters in BCTZ-0.5 and BaTiO3, and show that the priorly evidenced enhancement of piezoelectric response in the Amm2 phase of the former is associated with a more fragmented local structure. Specifically, Fig. 4a reports the ratio between the number of sites belonging to all R clusters over the total number of sites in the whole supercell in the macroscopic orthorhombic Amm2 phase of these two systems and as a function of temperature, while Fig. 4b displays the same ratio but for all O clusters. These two ratios are denoted as rR and rO, respectively. Figure 4c shows the so-called strength of the percolating O cluster, Inline graphic, corresponding to the per cent of sites belonging to the (infinite) percolating O cluster. Furthermore, Fig. 4d reports the difference between rO and Inline graphic, that is it represents the per cent of total volume occupied by the aforementioned first type of O clusters (that is, by the dynamical O clusters). Figure 4a,b demonstrate that the R and O clusters occupy a significant amount of the whole supercell in the macroscopic Amm2 state of both BCTZ-0.5 and BTO. For instance, for BaTiO3 at 240 K, rR and rO are both close to 40%. Interestingly, comparing Fig. 4b–d also tells us that most of the space occupied by the O clusters originates from the percolating O cluster, as demonstrated by the fact that rO–Inline graphic is always smaller than ≃6% for any temperature and decreases down to ≃1% when decreasing the temperature to 230 K. Other important information provided by Fig. 4 is that rO and thus Inline graphic are rather sensitive to temperature in the Amm2 state of both BCTZ-0.5 and BTO, unlike rR. For instance, Inline graphic increases from 25 to 41% when decreasing temperature from 296 to 230 K, while rR remains close to 40% in both the studied materials in that temperature range. Recalling that the range of stability of the Amm2 state typically occurs for higher temperatures in BCTZ-0.5 than in BaTiO3, one can therefore conclude that the local structure of the Amm2 phase of BCTZ-0.5 is more disordered/fragmented than that of BaTiO3. Such enhanced disordering allows for easier fluctuations of the polarization, and thus according to Fig. 2a to larger piezoelectricity. Figure 2b confirms the correlation between large piezoelectricity and enhancement of disordering of the local structure, as well as further sheds light into the strong connection between large electromechanical responses and percolating clusters, since 〈dave〉 is found to typically increase when Inline graphic decreases in both BCTZ-0.5 and BTO.

Figure 4. Cluster analysis.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a,b) Display the percentage occupied by the R and O clusters within the volume of the supercell (rR and rO). (c) Represents the Inline graphic strength of the percolating O cluster (that is, the infinite cluster that spreads from one side of the supercell to its opposite side along the [100], [010] or [001] pseudo-cubic directions36). (d) Represents the difference between rO and Inline graphic. These data (a–d) are shown for BCTZ-0.5 (filled symbols) and BTO (open symbols) in their macroscopic Amm2 state, and correspond to the average over 100 different dipolar configurations (associated with 100 different MC sweeps) at any considered temperature T in a 18 × 18 × 18 supercell. (e,f) Display examples of R clusters (in red) as well as the two types of O clusters (the non-percolating in yellow, and percolating ones in purple) as occurring within the supercell and in a given xy supercell cross-section in BTO at 250 K and in BCTZ-0.5 at 280 K, respectively.

To confirm this observation, we have additionally estimated the contribution to piezoelectricity stemming from each type of clusters in the Amm2 phase of BCTZ-0.5 (at 280 K) and BTO (at 250 K), by first determining at each MC sweep which local modes belong to which type of clusters and then using equation (2) for the local modes associated with each type of clusters. We found that, in the case of BCTZ-0.5 (BTO), the percolating O cluster, which occupies 31% (38.3%) of the supercell, has an individual piezoelectric response of 70.5 pC/N (48.9 pC/N), while the dynamical R and non-percolating O clusters, occupying, respectively, 38.4% (37.8%) and 3.3% (1.2%) of the supercell, have piezoelectric contributions of 68.8 pC/N (27.3 pC/N) and 29.5 pC/N (11.5 pC/N). These results consistently indicate that the larger the volume of the percolating O cluster, the lower is its contribution to the piezoelectric response (see Supplementary Note 1 for additional information about BCTZ-0.5). In light of these results, the trend line to achieve enhanced piezoelectricty appears to rest upon the relative fragmentation of local order. The latter can be tuned via x (see Supplementary Note 2 for additional information about BCTZ-x), via the application of a small electric field along one of the equivalent 〈111〉 directions that would depopulate the percolating O cluster, or alternatively, given the interplay between epitaxial strain and the orientation and morphology of local order37, via the application of epitaxial strain. Note, however, that these levers that would allow the tuning of the ratio of R and non-percolating O clusters to percolating O clusters in favour of the former ones are in interplay with temperature, a parameter that is intrinsically related to the studied phenomenon via thermal fluctuations.

Discussion

In summary, atomistic simulations within an effective Hamiltonian scheme predict that BCTZ-0.5 undergoes a P4mm–Amm2 transition that occurs near room temperature, and that yields an orthorhombic state that has a rather flat free-energy landscape as well as a small temperature range of stability. A a result, larger fluctuations of the polarization occur in the Amm2 state of BCTZ-0.5 with respect to BaTiO3, thereby inducing higher piezoelectric responses near 300 K. Moreover, our study further reveals that this larger piezoelectric response is intrinsically linked to a specific feature of the local structure, namely the smaller strength of the percolating cluster. Interestingly, such cluster is of orthorhombic rather than rhombohedral local symmetry, and, as result, is missing in the famous Comes–Guinier–Lambert model19. In other words, such latter model ought to be generalized (by including O clusters in the Amm2 phase) be able to capture the microscopic origins of physical properties of BCTZ-0.5 and BTO.

Note that our study focuses on single phases. However, we also expect that the formation and coexistence of several phases inside BCTZ-0.5 will contribute to further enhancing piezoelectricity. This expectation stems from the fact that the barrier height of the free energy corresponds to the interface tension or, in other words, to the energy of the domain wall between phases of different symmetry38, and, from this perspective, the reduction of the barrier height revealed in Fig. 3 when going from BaTiO3 to BCTZ-0.5 enables domain wall fluctuations that should further strengthen the electromechanical response39.

We hope that such findings not only provide a better understanding of BCTZ-x systems but also can be used in the quest for other lead-free systems with high electromechanical conversion. For instance, our results suggest that one possibility for generating large piezoelectricity is to mix one system having a single-phase transition from cubic paraelectric to ferroelectric rhombohedral at a temperature to be denoted by Tc1, with another material having another single-phase transition but from cubic paraelectric to ferroelectric tetragonal at a temperature to be denoted Tc2. This mixing can then result in the emergence of a ferroelectric orthorhombic state having flat free-energy minimum, within a narrow temperature region that is located in-between the temperature stability regions of the ferroelectric tetragonal and ferroelectric rhombohedral states. The key factor to then obtain large room-temperature piezoelectric response is to make the stability of the orthorhombic state occurring in a region comprising room temperature, which can happen by finding the right amount of mixing between the two compounds and the right Tc1 and Tc2 temperatures. Note that, in this scenario, the existence of a tricritical point, where the tetragonal and rhombohedral ferroelectric states meet with the paraelectric phase, can occur at a specific composition and temperature but the highest room-temperature piezoelectric response can correspond to other compositions, namely the ones for which the orthorhombic state is stable within a small temperature region comprising 280–300 K. These are precisely the conditions encountered in BCTZ-x (refs 12, 23). Note also that this scenario is different from, that is, the mixing of rhombohedral Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 of lower Ti compositions with tetragonal Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 of larger Ti concentrations for which the coexistence of rhombohedral and tetragonal domains40, or the occurrence of a compositionally induced bridging monoclinic phase4,15, can yield large electromechanical response, since our scenario consists in creating a macroscopic orthorhombic phase of small temperature range of stability in-between the temperature ranges of the tetragonal and rhombohedral states.

Data availbility

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Nahas, Y. et al. Microscopic origins of the large piezoelectricity of leadfree (Ba,Ca)(Zr,Ti)O3. Nat. Commun. 8, 15944 doi: 10.1038/ncomms15944 (2017).

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
ncomms15944-s1.pdf (668.1KB, pdf)
Peer Review File
ncomms15944-s2.pdf (332.4KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs R. Ranjan and J. Kreisel for insightful discussions. Y.N. and L.B. acknowledge the ARO grant W911NF-16-1-0227. A.A. and S.Prok. thank the DARPA grant HR0011-15-2-0038 (MATRIX programme). S.Pros. appreciates the ONR Grant N00014-12-1-1034 and grants 3.1649.2017/PP from RME (Russian Ministry of Education) and 16-52-0072 Bel_a from RFBR (Russian Foundation for Basic Research). R.W. thanks the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. DGE-0957325 and the University of Arkansas Graduate School Distinguished Doctoral Fellowship. We also acknowledge the support of the Luxembourg National Research Fund through the PEARL (Grant FNR/P12/4853155/Kreisel COFERMAT, J.Í.) and inter-mobility (Grant FNR/INTER/MOBILITY/15/9890527 GREENOX, L.B. and J.Í.) programs. S.Pros. also appreciates Russian Ministry of Education grant 3.1649.2017/PP.

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Author contributions Y.N. performed effective Hamiltonian simulations and conducted Wang-Landau calculations, cluster and fluctuation analysis. A.A. computed the phase diagram displayed in the Supplementary Fig. 4. S.Prok. and Y.N. performed molecular dynamics simulations for assessing clusters dynamics, and computed their individual piezoelectric responses. S.Pros., R.W. and L.B. extracted the effective Hamiltonian parameters. I.K. developed the Wang-Landau code that was used to obtain Fig. 3, and provided discussions along with J.Í., S.Prosandeev. and S.Prokhorenko. L.B. wrote the original version of the manuscript, which was then extensively modified due to the feedback and suggestions of all authors.

10/25/2017

A correction has been published and is appended to both the HTML and PDF versions of this paper. The error has not been fixed in the paper.

References

  1. Bellaiche L. Piezoelectricity of ferroelectric perovskites from first principles. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 6, 19–25 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  2. Lines M. E. & Glass A. M. Principles and Applications of Ferroelectrics and Related Materials Oxford university press (1977). [Google Scholar]
  3. Uchino K. Piezoelectric, Actuators and Ultrasonic Motors Kluwer Academic Publishers (1996). [Google Scholar]
  4. Noheda B. et al. A monoclinic ferroelectric phase in the Pb(Zr1−xTix)O3 solid solution. Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 2059–2061 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  5. Lee C.-K. & Moon F. C. Modal sensors/actuators. J. Appl. Mech. 57, 434–441 (1990). [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhang Q. M., Wang H., Kim N. & Cross L. E. Direct evaluation of domain-wall and intrinsic contributions to the dielectric and piezoelectric response and their temperature dependence on lead zirconate-titante ceramics. J. Appl. Phys. 75, 454–459 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  7. Guo R. et al. Origin of the high piezoelectric response in PbZr1−xTixO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5423–5426 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Park S.-E. & Shrout T. E. Ultrahigh strain and piezoelectric behavior in relaxor based ferroelectric single crystals. J. Appl. Phys. 82, 1804–1811 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  9. European Commission. Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment. Off. J. Eur. Union L 37, 19–23 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  10. European Commission. Directive 2011/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment. Off. J. Eur. Union L 174, 88–110 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu W. & Ren Z. Large piezoelectric effect in Pb-free ceramics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 257602 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Acosta M. et al. Origin of the large piezoelectric activity in ((1−x)Ba(Zr0.2Ti0.8)O3−x(Ba0.7Ca0.3)TiO3 ceramics. Phys. Rev. B 91, 104108 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  13. Brajesh K., Tanwar K., Abebe M. & Ranjan R. Relaxor ferroelectricity and electric-field-driven structural transformation in the giant lead-free piezoelectric (Ba,Ca)(Ti,Zr)O3. Phys. Rev. B 92, 224112 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  14. Brajesh K., Abebe M. & Ranjan R. Structural transformations in morphotropic-phase-boundary composition of the lead-free piezoelectric system Ba(Zr0.2Ti0.8)O3−(Ba0.7Ca0.3)TiO3. Phys. Rev. B 94, 104108 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  15. Bellaiche L., A. García L. & Vanderbilt D. Finite-temperature properties of Pb(Zr1−xTix)O3 alloys from first-principles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5427–5430 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bellaiche L., García A. & Vanderbilt D. Low-temperature properties of Pb(Zr1−xTix)O3 solid solutions near the morphotropic phase boundary. Ferroelectrics 266, 41–56 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  17. Fu H. & Cohen R. E. Polarization rotation mechanism for ultrahigh electromechanical response in single-crystal piezoelectrics. Nature 403, 281–283 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Grinberg I., Cooper V. R. & Rappe A. M. Relationship between local structure and phase transitions of a disordered solid solution. Nature 419, 909–911 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Comes R., Lambert M. & Guinier A. The chain structure of BaTiO3 and KNbO3. Solid State Commun. 6, 715–719 (1968). [Google Scholar]
  20. Van Vechten J. A. Quantum dielectric theory of electronegativity in covalent systems. I. Electronic dielectric constant. Phys. Rev. A 182, 891–905 (1969). [Google Scholar]
  21. Bellaiche L. & Vanderbilt D. Virtual crystal approximation revisited: application to dielectric and piezoelectric properties of perovskites. Phys. Rev. B 61, 7877–7882 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhong W., Vanderbilt D. & Rabe K. M. First-principles theory of ferroelectric phase transitions for perovskites: the case of BaTiO3. Phys. Rev. B 52, 6301–6312 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Keeble D. S., Benabdallah F., Thomas P. A., Maglione M. & Kreisel J. Revised structural phase diagram of Ba(Zr0.2Ti0.8)O3−(Ba0.7Ca0.3)TiO3. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 092903 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  24. Walizer L., Lisenkov S. & Bellaiche L. Finite-temperature properties of (Ba,Sr)TiO3 systems from atomistic simulations. Phys. Rev. B 73, 144105 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  25. Menoret C. et al. Structural evolution and polar order in Sr1−xBaxTiO3. Phys. Rev. B 65, 224104 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  26. Lemanov V. V., Smirnova E. P., Syrnikov P. P. & Tarakanov E. A. Phase transitions and glasslike behavior in Sr1−xBaxTiO3. Phys. Rev. B 54, 3151–3157 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Garcìa A. & Vanderbilt D. Electromechanical behavior of BaTiO3 from first principles. Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 2981–2983 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  28. Bin-Omran S., Kornev I. A. & Bellaiche L. Wang-Landau Monte Carlo formalism applied to ferroelectrics. Phys. Rev. B 93, 014104 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  29. Hoshen J. & Kopelman R. Percolation and cluster distribution. I. Cluster multiple labeling technique and critical concentration algorithm. Phys. Rev. B 14, 3438–3445 (1976). [Google Scholar]
  30. Nahas Y. Gauge Theory for Relaxor Ferroelectrics (PhD thesis, Ecole Centrale, 2013).
  31. Prokhorenko S., Nahas Y. & Bellaiche L. Fluctuations and topological defects in proper ferroelectric crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 147601 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Nahas Y., Prokhorenko S., Kornev I. & Bellaiche L. Topological point defects in relaxor ferroelectrics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 127601 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hlinka J. et al. Coexistence of the phonon and relaxation soft modes in the terahertz dielectric response of tetragonal BaTiO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 167402 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Salje E. et al. Elastic excitations in BaTiO3 single crystals and ceramics: mobile domain boundaries and polar nanoregions observed by resonant ultrasonic spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 87, 014106 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  35. Akbarzadeh A. R., Prosandeev S., Walter E. J., Al-Barakaty A. & Bellaiche L. Finite-temperature properties of Ba(Zr,Ti)O3 relaxors from first principles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 257601 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Stauffer D. & Aharony A. Introduction to Percolation Theory Taylor & Francis (1994). [Google Scholar]
  37. Prosandeev S., Wang D. & Bellaiche L. Properties of epitaxial films made of relaxor ferroelectrics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 247602 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Meyer B. & Vanderbilt D. Ab initio study of ferroelectric domain walls in PbTiO3. Phys. Rev. B 65, 104111 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  39. Brierley R. T. & Littlewood P. B. Domain wall fluctuations in ferroelectrics coupled to strain. Phys. Rev. B 89, 184104 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  40. Topolov V. Y. Heterogeneous Ferroelectric Solid Solutions: Phases and Domain States Springer (2011). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
ncomms15944-s1.pdf (668.1KB, pdf)
Peer Review File
ncomms15944-s2.pdf (332.4KB, pdf)

Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES