Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2017 Jun 23;12(6):e0179966. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179966

Floristic characteristics and affinities in Lao PDR, with a reference to the biogeography of the Indochina peninsula

Hua Zhu 1,*
Editor: Tzen-Yuh Chiang2
PMCID: PMC5482479  PMID: 28644895

Abstract

The flora of Laos is composed of 5,005 species in 1,373 genera and 188 families of seed plants. Floristic and geographical attributes of the flora were analyzed. Tropical floristic elements at the family and generic levels contributed a majority (62.23% of the families and 82.30% of the genera) of the flora, of which the dominant geographical elements were pantropical distribution (42.02% of families) and tropical Asian distribution (30.08% of genera). This revealed that the flora of Lao PDR is tropical in nature and has a conspicuously tropical Asian affinity. Compared with the neighbouring countries of the Indochina peninsula, the flora of Laos has similar floristic composition and geographical elements. The floras of these Indochinese countries have similarities of more than 77.84% at the generic level, which suggests that they compose an affiliated biogeographical region. However, the flora of Laos showed the highest similarity to the flora of Vietnam (92.13%), followed by Myanmar (86.01%) at the generic level, but has less East Asian and North Temperate elements than Vietnam, and less North Temperate elements than Myanmar. These differences among the compared countries could be explained by the extrusion of the Indochinese block with the uplift of the Himalayas.

Introduction

Lao PDR (Lao People’s Democratic Republic), one of the world’s poorest countries, is located in the center of mainland Southeast Asia and covers 236,800 square kilometers (Fig 1). It is surrounded by Myanmar (Burma), Thailand, Cambodia, Vietnam, and the People's Republic of China. The topography of Laos is largely mountainous, with the Annamite Range in the northeast and east and the Luang Prabang Range in the northwest (Fig 2). It has elevations from 500 m in river valleys up to 2,819 m at the highest summit of Phou Bia mountain. Laos has a tropical monsoon climate, with a pronounced rainy season from May through October, a cool dry season from November through February, and a hot dry season in March and April [1].

Fig 1. Geographical location of Lao PDR and the compared neighbouring countries.

Fig 1

(The figure was made by the Landscape Ecology Lab., Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, CAS).

Fig 2. Topography of the Indochina peninsula.

Fig 2

(The figure was made by the Landscape Ecology Lab., Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, CAS).

Floristic and vegetation studies of Lao PDR are uncommon. Vidal [2, 3] described the forests of Laos. He distinguished the forest types of Laos as moist semi-deciduous forests with dipterocarps, mixed deciduous forests, and savanna in the lowlands, and moist montane forest of Fagaceae and Lauraceae species dominating the highlands. According to Blasco’s vegetation map of tropical continental Asia [4, 5], tropical lowland semi-evergreen rain forest, tropical dry deciduous forest and tropical moist deciduous forest, as well as dry deciduous dipterocarp woodland are the main vegetation types in the lowlands, and the tropical montane rain forest and gymnosperm forests at high elevations in Laos.

The flora of French Indochina began with a study from Loureiro [6], which was later revised by Lecomte et al. [7], and revised again by Aubrevile [8], in which the flora of Laos was included. There were two checklists referring to the plants of Lao PDR, i.e., Vidal [9] and Callanghan [10]. In Vidal’s list, more than 1,000 local names of plants were illustrated, and in Callanghan’s list more than 2,000 plant species were included. A new and updated checklist of the vascular plants of Lao PDR was recently published [11], in which 4,850 species including native, cultivated, and naturalized vascular plants were listed. Although the Newman's checklist is derived from a very incomplete data set, it is possible to use for a biogeographical analysis of Lao PDR.Understanding the floristic characteristics and affinities of Laos is important for understanding the plant geography of the Indochina peninsula. This paper aims to (i) analyze the floristic patterns and geographical elements of Laos; (ii) examine its floristic affinity to neighbouring countries; and (iii) discuss biogeography of the Indochina peninsula.

Materials and methods

An updated list of native seed plants in Laos PDR is completed based upon entries in the checklist of the vascular plants of Lao PDR[11]; excluding cultivated, introduced, and invasive species and recent surveys conducted by Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Science. After compiling these entries, circumscription of families was updated following APG III [12, 13], and species names were rectified following the nomenclature and classification as presented in the w3TROPICOS of Missouri Botanical Garden (http://mobot.mobot.org/W3T/Search/vast.html). The updated list includes a total of 5,005 species in 1,373 genera and 188 families (S1 Table). Floristic and geographical attributes of the flora of Laos were analyzed based on the list. Patterns of seed plant distribution were quantified at the generic level mainly based on Wu’s documentation [14] and Wu et al. [15], Mabberley's Plant-Book [16], and at the family level following Wu et al.[17]. A minority of Wu’s circumscription on families did not corresponded with APG III. The distribution types of these variant families were determined by the actual distribution of these families. The geographical elements based on distribution types at family and generic levels were classified as: Cosmopolitan, Pantropic, Tropical Asia and Tropical America disjunct, Old World Tropics, Tropical Asia to Tropical Australia, Tropical Asia to Tropical Africa, Tropical Asia, North Temperate, East Asia and North America disjunct, Old World Temperate, Temperate Asia, Mediterranean region, West to Central Asia, Central Asia, East Asia and SW China to N Indochina. Comparisons of both floristic and geographical elements were made to assess the floristic similarity and variation as well as biogeographical affinities between neighbouring countries. Analyses were based upon published plant lists from Myanmar [18], Thailand [19], and Vietnam [20], and circumscription of families, genera, and species in these lists were rectified following APG III and the w3TROPICOS of Missouri Botanical Garden.

Results

Floristic composition

A total of 5,005 species in 1,373 genera and 188 families of native seed plants from Lao PDR were confirmed in total. Families with more than 100 species include Fabaceae (100 genera /521 species), Orchidaceae (96 /506), Euphorbiaceae (48/231), Rubiaceae (64/229), Poaceae (78/177), Lamiaceae (38/149), Cyperaceae (19/114), Fagaceae (4/109), Moraceae (7/108), Asteraceae (59/180), and Zingiberaceae (15/104) (Table 1). Of them, Orchidaceae, Euphorbiaceae, and Moraceae have a pantropic distribution. Zingiberaceae has a tropical Asian to tropical Australian distribution, Fagaceae has a north temperate distribution, and all others have a cosmopolitan distribution.

Table 1. Dominant (top 30) families and genera in species richness with their distribution.

Family ranking by their species richness No. of species in the flora Distribution type* Genera ranking by their species richness No. of species in the flora Distribution type*
Fabaceae 521 2 Dendrobium 92 5
Orchidaceae 506 1 Ficus 75 2
Euphorbiaceae 231 2 Bulbophyllum 65 2
Rubiaceae 229 1 Lithocarpus 50 9
Poaceae 177 1 Desmodium 41 9
Lamiaceae 149 1 Bauhinia 38 2
Cyperaceae 114 1 Ardisia 36 2
Fagaceae 109 8 Diospyros 32 2
Moraceae 108 2 Syzygium 32 4
Zingiberaceae 104 5 Crotalaria 31 2
Scrophulariaceae 89 1 Dalbergia 31 2
Araceae 84 2 Fimbristylis 31 2
Apocynaceae 79 2 Quercus 31 8
Asteraceae 79 1 Calamus 29 5
Annonaceae 77 2 Symplocos 27 2
Convolvulaceae 67 1 Castanopsis 27 7
Acanthaceae 65 2 Dioscorea 26 2
Arecaceae 64 2 Lindernia 26 2
Rosaceae 62 1 Eria 26 5
Myrsinaceae 60 2 Cyperus 25 1
Rutaceae 59 2 Croton 24 2
Sterculiaceae 56 2 Ipomoea 24 2
Asclepiadaceae 54 2 Millettia 24 2
Malvaceae 49 2 Oldenlandia 24 2
Meliaceae 47 2 Habenaria 24 8
Myrtaceae 44 2 Smilax 22 2
Sapindaceae 42 2 Eriocaulon 20 2
Theaceae 42 2 Indigofera 20 2
Lauraceae 41 2 Globba 20 5
Commelinaceae 40 2 Carex 19 1

*Distribution type: 1: cosmopolitan, 2: pantropic, 4 Old World Tropic, 5 tropical Asia to tropical Australia, 7 tropical Asia, 8 north temperate, 9 east Asia and north America disjunct

At the generic level, Dendrobium, with 92 species, is the most species-rich genus, followed by Ficus (75 species), Bulbophyllum (65), Lithocarpus (50), Desmodium (41), Bauhinia (38), Ardisia (36), Diospyros (32), Syzygium (32), Crotalaria (31), Dalbergia (31), Fimbristylis (31), and Quercus (31). Among these 13 species-rich genera, the major distribution type is pantropic, which include Ficus, Bulbophyllum, Bauhinia, Ardisia, and Diospyros. Lithocarpus and Desmodium have an East Asian and North American disjunct distribution, and Syzygium has an Old World Tropic distribution. Dendrobium has a tropical Asian to tropical Australian distribution, and Quercus has a north temperate distribution (Table 1).

Geographical elements

In the flora of Lao PDR, families with a tropical distribution contribute 62.23% of the total families of the flora including those with a pantropical distribution (42.02%), such as Annonaceae, Anacardiaceae, Burseraceae, Combretaceae, Ebenaceae, Sapindaceae, and Sapotacea. Araliaceae, Aquifoliaceae, Elaeocarpaceae, and Styracaceae contribute to 7.45% of floral diversity in Laos and have a tropical Asian and tropical American distribution. Additionally, flora with a tropical Asian to tropical Australian distribution, such as Zingiberaceae, contributes 4.26%, and families occurring in tropical Asia, such as Carlemanniaceae, Crypteroniaceae, Mastixiaceae, Pentaphragmaceae, and Sladeniaceae contribute 3.19% of flora diversity. Families with mainly temperate distributions contribute 15.43% of the total flora including Caprifoliaceae, Liliaceae, Pinaceae, Betulaceae, Fagaceae, and Salicaceae. Families with a cosmopolitan distribution contribute 22.34% of the total flora (Table 2).

Table 2. Geographical elements of seed plants at the family level in the flora of Laos.

Geographical elements
at family level
Number of family %*
1 Cosmopolitan 42 22.34
2 Pantropic 79 42.02
3 Tropical Asia and Tropical America disjunct 14 7.45
4 Old World Tropic 6 3.19
5 Tropical Asia to Tropical Australia 8 4.26
6 Tropical Asia to Tropical Africa 4 2.13
7 Tropical Asia 6 3.19
Tropical elements (types 2–7) in total 117 62.23
8 North Temperate 19 10.11
9 East Asia and North America disjunct 8 4.26
10 East Asia 2 1.06
Temperate elements (types 8–10) in total 29 15.43
Total number of families 188 100

*The number of families in each geographical element/ the number of families of all geographical elements times 100.

Patterns of seed plant distribution of the flora at the generic level are enumerated in Table 3. The genera with tropical Asian distribution, such as Aganosma, Alphonsea, Amoora, Chukrasia, Crypteronia, Knema, Mastixia, Mitrephora, Mycetia, and Pterospermum, show the highest percentage among all distribution types, contributing 30.08% to the flora. Genera with pantropic distribution, such as Ardisia, Bauhinia, Cryptocarya, Capparis, Croton, Dioscorea, Gnetum, Morinda, Marsdenia, Piper, and Uncaria, contribute 19.81% to the flora of Laos. Genera with tropical Asian to tropical Australian distribution, contributing 11.51%, include Argyreia, Dillenia, Lagerstroemia, Loesenneriella, Murray, and Toona. The genera with Old World tropical distribution, such as Barringtonia, Carallia, Canarium, Chasalia, Dracaena, Fissistigma, Pandanus, and Polyalthia, contribute 9.69% of flora diversity. Genera with tropical Asian to tropical African distribution include Anogeissus, Bombax, Flacourtia, Garcinia, Mitragyna, and Premna. In total, genera of tropical distribution (types two–seven) comprise 82.30% of the total diversity of the Laotian flora. The genera with northern temperate distribution, such as Artemisia, Betula, Carpinus, Cornus, Corydalis, Pinus, Salix, and Sorbus, contribute 4.30% of the total genera. The genera with East Asian distributions, such as Actinidia, Belamcandia, Aspidistra, Cephalotaxus, Choerospondia, Gardneria, Hovenia, Pegia, Skimmia, Stachyrus, and Pterocarya, contribute 3.20% of the total genera. In total, genera with temperate distributions (types eight–14) contribute 16.68% of the total number, including five genera that have SW China to N Indochina distribution such as Calcareoboea, Craspedolobium, Cunninghamia, Drepanostachyum, and Tapiscia (Table 3). Only two genera are recorded as endemic to Laos, i.e., Laosanthus of Zingiberaceae and Iodocephalus of Asteraceae.

Table 3. Geographical elements of seed plants at the generic level in the flora of Laos.

Geographical elements
at generic level
Number of genera %*
1 Cosmopolitan 59 4.30
2 Pantropic 272 19.81
3 Tropical Asia and Tropical America disjunct 48 3.50
4 Old World Tropic 133 9.69
5 Tropical Asia to Tropical Australia 158 11.51
6 Tropical Asia to Tropical Africa 106 7.72
7 Tropical Asia 413 30.08
Tropical elements (types 2–7) in total (1130) (82.30)
8 North Temperate 59 4.30
9 East Asia and North America disjunct 37 2.69
10 Old World Temperate 26 1.89
11 Temperate Asia 2 0.15
12 Mediterranean, W Asia to C Asia 9 0.66
13 East Asia 44 3.20
14 SW China to N Indochina 5 0.36
Temperate elements (types 8–14) in total (186) (16.68)
15 Endemic to Laos 2 0.15
Total number of genera 1373 100.00

*The number of genera in each geographical element/ the number of genera of all geographical elements times 100.

Comparison with the floras of Vietnam, Thailand, and Myanmar

The floristic similarities at the generic and species levels between the floras of Laos, Vietnam, Thailand, and Myanmar are given in Table 4. The floristic similarities between the flora of Laos and the floras from neighbouring countries exceed 77.84% at the generic level. The flora of Laos shows the highest similarity to the flora of Vietnam (92.13%), followed by the flora of Myanmar (86.01%). However, at specific level, except for the similarity between Laos and Vietnam, which is 61.19%, all other countries have relatively low similarities (lower than 45%). The lowest similarity at the specific level exists between Vietnam and Myanmar.

Table 4. Comparison of floristic similarities at the generic and specific levels.

Compared flora Laos Vietnam Thailand Myanmar
Similarity coefficient (%) Similarity coefficient (%) Similarity coefficient (%) Similarity coefficient (%)
Similarity coefficients at generic level*
Laos 100
Vietnam 92.13 100
Thailand 77.84 87.53 100
Myanmar 86.01 79.93 83.93 100
Similarity coefficients at specific level*
Laos 100
Vietnam 61.19 100
Thailand 42.47 44.8 100
Myanmar 40.07 32.49 39.18 100

*Similarity coefficient between A and B = the number of taxa shared by both A and B divided by the lowest number of taxa of A or B, multiplied by 100%

The comparison of geographical elements at the family level shows that these compared floras are almost the same. Laos and its neighbouring countries have tropical families contributing to 59.82%– 62.23% and temperate families contributing 15.43%– 19.57% of floral diversity. The minor differences are: the north temperate and East Asian families are more often found in Myanmar and the highest ratio of temperate families is found in Vietnam (Table 5).

Table 5. Comparison of geographical elements of seed plants at the family level.

Compared regional floras Laos (188 families) Vietnam (231 families) Thailand (201 families) Myanmar (209 families)
Geographical elements
at family level
%* %* %* %*
1 Cosmopolitan 22.34 20.00 22.39 22.49
2 Pantropic 42.02 38.26 41.79 38.76
3 Tropical Asia and Tropical America disjunct 7.45 6.52 5.47 6.22
4 Old World Tropic 3.19 4.35 4.98 4.31
5 Tropical Asia to Tropical Australia 4.26 3.91 3.48 3.83
6 Tropical Asia to Tropical Africa 2.13 2.61 1.99 2.87
7 Tropical Asia 3.19 4.78 3.98 3.83
Tropical elements (types 2–7) in total 62.23 60.43 61.69 59.82
8 North Temperate 10.11 12.17 10.45 14.35
9 East Asia and North America disjunct 4.26 4.35 3.48 0.00
10 Old World Temperate 0 0.43 0.00 0.00
Mediterranean, W Asia to C Asia 0 0.43 0.00 0.00
11 East Asia 1.06 2.17 1.99 3.35
Temperate elements (types 8–11) in total 15.43 19.57 15.92 17.7
Total 188 230 201 209

*The number of family in each geographical element/ the number of family of all geographical elements times 100.

The comparison of geographical elements at the generic level from these regional floras shows some differences. Although the tropical elements (types two–seven) contribute more than 72.52% of the total genera in all of the compared floras, the highest proportion of the tropical elements occurs in the flora of Thailand (comprising 84.95% of all the genera). The flora of Myanmar has a higher proportion of geographical elements of temperate flora (22.75%), such as north temperate and east Asia elements (Table 6).

Table 6. Comparison of geographical elements of seed plants at the generic level.

Compared regional floras Laos
(1373 genera)
Vietnam
(2017 genera)
Thailand
(1475 genera)
Myanma
(1903)
Geographical elements
at generic level
%* %* %* %*
1 Cosmopolitan 4.30 3.87 3.86 4.47
2 Pantropic 19.81 17.60 20.88 17.66
3 Tropical Asia and Tropical America disjunct 3.50 3.27 2.31 3.10
4 Old World Tropic 9.69 9.07 10.64 8.99
5 Tropical Asia to Tropical Australia 11.51 9.77 11.66 9.56
6 Tropical Asia to Tropical Africa 7.72 6.74 7.32 6.73
7 Tropical Asia 30.08 29.65 32.14 26.48
Tropical elements (types 2–7) in total 82.30 76.10 84.95 72.52
8 North Temperate 4.30 6.30 3.93 7.46
9 East Asia and North America disjunct 2.69 2.83 1.83 3.05
10 Old World Temperate 1.89 2.68 1.42 3.73
11 Temperate Asia 0.15 0.35 0.14 0.37
12 Mediterranean, W Asia to C Asia 0.66 0.79 0.54 1.26
13 Center Asia 3.20 0.05 0.07 0.32
14 East Asia 0.36 5.85 2.78 6.20
15 SW China to N Indochina 4.30 1.19 0.07 0.37
Temperate elements (types 8–15) in total 13.26 20.03 10.78 22.75
Endemic to Laos 0.15 0 0
Endemic to Vietnam 0 0
Endemic to Burma 0.41
Endemic to Burma 0.26
Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

*The number of genera in each geographical element/ the number of genera of all geographical elements times 100.

Discussion

Like the floras of southern China from the northern margin of tropical Asia [2125], the flora of Lao PDR and other countries in Indochina peninsula, have a similar floristic composition and tropical Asian affinity, The flora of Laos is dominated by the same species-rich families and genera such as Fabaceae, Orchidaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Rubiaceae, Poaceae, Lamiaceae, Fagaceae, Moraceae, Zingiberaceae, Ficus, Bulbophyllum, Lithocarpus, Desmodium, Bauhinia, Ardisia, Diospyros, Syzygium, and Dalbergia. It also has a majority of tropical elements (62.23% of the total families and 82.30% of the total genera). The most dominant genera are those from tropical Asia (30.08% of the total genera). This reveals that the flora of Lao PDR is tropical in nature and has a conspicuously tropical Asian affinity.

Located at the centre of the Indochina peninsula, the flora of Laos is similar to the floras of Vietnam, Thailand, and Myanmar at the family and genera level (for example, more than 77.84% of similarity at the generic level). Additionally, Laos and its neighbouring countries have a similar composition in geographical elements. Our research has shown that the counties of the Indochina peninsula are floristically continuous and compose an affiliated biogeographical region. Moreover, the flora of Laos has the highest similarity to the flora of Vietnam (92.13% at the generic level and 61.19% at the specific level). It is logical that Laos and Vietnam have the most similar flora because of the physical geographic connection between them. Additionally, Vietnam has more East Asian and north temperate elements than the flora of Laos. Compared with the other neighbouring countries, the flora of Myanmar has the lowest proportion in tropical elements and the highest in temperate elements, while the flora of Thailand has the highest tropical elements and the lowest temperate elements. The biogeography of the Indochina peninsula could be explained by geologic block movements with the uplift of the Himalayas in these regions [2632]. Fig 3 shows the boundaries of the main geoblocks in Southeast Asia [33]. Continental Southeast Asia comprises a collage of blocks bounded by suture zones [32]. The Indochina peninsula was formed from the Indochina block or terrane, South China block, Shan-Thai terrane and West Burma block [33]. These geoblocks each have a different geological history. With the collision between India and Eurasia, which began in the early Cenozoic [34], the Indochina block extruded southeastward along the Ailao Shan-Red River shear zone in the Oligocene and early Miocene [2628], while the Shan-Thai terrane underwent displacements and strike-slip faulting [35]. India collided with northern Myanmar and Tibet in the latest Eocene, and since the latest Cretaceous, the Burma plate has moved 1100 km northward relative to the Asian plate to the east [36]. The geological history of the Indochina blocks could have affected its biogeography.

Fig 3. The main geoblocks in Southeast Asia (from Fortey et al., 1998).

Fig 3

Tropical Asian elements conspicuously influenced the flora of Laos during the extrusion of the Indochinese block (southward translocation of the Indochina Block) with uplift of the Himalayas. This could have resulted in the tropical Asian affinity of its flora. The flora of Vietnam has more east Asian and north temperate elements because the northeastern part of Vietnam is part of the East Asian geoblock. The flora of Myanmar has the lowest tropical elements and the highest in temperate elements, which could be because northern Myanmar is contiguous to the Himalayas and became influenced by the temperate flora of Himalayas.

Conclusions

A revised list of native seed plants from Laos PDR is presented comprising 5,005 species in 1,373 genera and 188 families. Geographical elements show that the families with tropical distribution contribute 62.23% of the total sum of the flora including flora with pantropical distribution (42.02%). The genera with a tropical distribution contribute 82.30%, in which the genera of tropical Asia make up 30.08%. This reveals that the flora of Lao PDR is tropical in nature and has a conspicuously tropical Asian affinity. The flora of Laos has similar floristic composition and geographical elements to its neighbouring countries from the Indochina peninsula and belongs to the same biogeographical unit. Compared with other Indochinese countries, the flora of Laos has the highest similarity with the flora of Vietnam (92.13% at the generic level and 61.19% at the specific), followed by Myanmar at the generic level and Thailand at the specific level. However, the floras of Myanmar and Vietnam have more north temperate and east Asian elements. The biogeography of Indochinese countries could be explained not only by their geographical locations, but also by geologic block movements of these regions. Specifically, the extrusion of the Indochinese block took place with the uplift of the Himalayas.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Native seed plant list in Lao PDR.

(The circumscriptions of families follow APG III, and species nomenclature follows w3TROPICOS (http://mobot.mobot.org/W3T/Search/vast.html).

(XLS)

Acknowledgments

The database was made by Yan Lichun. TopEdit company (www.topedit.cn) made English polishing for the article. I thank reviewers’ constructive suggestions on this article.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its supporting information files.

Funding Statement

The research funded by the national science foundation of China. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Epprecht M., Minot N., Dewina R., Messerli P., Heinimann A. (2008) The Geography of Poverty and Inequality in the Lao PDR Swiss National Center of Competence in Research (NCCR) North-South, University of Bern, and International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Bern: Geographica Bernensia. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Vidal J. (1960) The forests of Laos. Bois Et Forets Des Tropiques 1960: 5.. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vidal J. (1972) La vegetation du Laos. Vientiane, Vithagna, 120 p. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Blasco F., Bellan M.F. & Aizpuru M. (1996) A vegetation map of tropical continental Asia at scale 1:5 million. Journal of Vegetation Science 7: 623–634. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Blasco F., Whitmore T. C. & Charles G. (2000) A framework for the worldwide comparison of tropical woody vegetation types. Biological Conservation 95: 175–189. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Loureiro J. D. (1790) Flora Cochinchinense. Berolini, Lisbon. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lecomte H., Hunbert H. & Gagnepain F. (1907–1959) Flore gen. Indochine, 8 vols. Paris: Masson & Cie Editeurs. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Aubréville, A., Tardieu-Blot, N.L. & Vidal, J.E., eds. (1960-present) Flore du Cambodge, du Laos et du Vietnam. Paris.
  • 9.Vidal, J. (1959). Noms Vernaculaires de Plantes (Lao, Mèo, Kha) en Usage au Laos. Extrait du Bulletin de l’Ecole Francaise d’Etrême-Orient, Tome XLIX, fascicule 2, Paris
  • 10.Callaghan, M. (2004) Checklist of Lao Plant Names. Vientiane.
  • 11.Newman M., Ketphanh S., Svengsuksa B., Thomas P., Sengdala K., Lamxay V. & Armstrong K. (2007) A checklist of the vascular plants of Lao PDR. 375 pp. Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Scotland, UK [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chase M.W. & Reveal J.L. (2009) A phylogenetic classification of the land plants to accompany APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 161: 122–127. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.THE ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP. (2009) An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 161: 105.. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wu Z.Y. (1991) The areal-types of Chinese genera of seed plants. Acta Botanica Yunnanica Suppl. 4: 1..(In Chinese with English abstract) [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wu Z.Y., Zhou Z.K., Sun H., Li D.Z. & Peng H. (2006) The areal-types of seed plants and their origin and differentiation. Kunming: Yunnan Science and Technology Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mabberley D.J. (2008) Mabberley's Plant-Book: A Portable Dictionary of Plants, their Classification and Uses: Third Edition Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wu Z.Y., Zhou Z.K., Li D.Z., Peng H. & Sun H. (2003) The areal-types of the world families of seed plants. Acta Botanica Yunnanica 25: 245..(In Chinese with English abstract) [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kress W.J., DePilipps R.A., Farr E. & Kyi Daw Yin Yin. (2003) A checklist of trees, shrubs, herbs and climbers of Myanmar. Smithsonian Institution contributions from the United States Herbarium 45: 1–590. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Smitinand T. (2001) Thai Plant Namess. Bangkok: The Forest Herbarium, Royal Forest Department. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chan L.T. (1999) Some basic characters of Vietnam flora. Science and Technics Publishing House, Hanoi. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhu H, Yan L.C., Qin H.N. (2003) Floristic composition and characteristics of Vietnamese flora. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni 42(6): 98–102. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhu H. & Roos M. C. (2004) The tropical flora of S China and its affinity to Indo-Malesian flora. Telopea 10(2): 639–648. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhu H. (2008) The tropical flora of southern Yunnan, China, and its biogeographical affinities. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 95: 661.. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhu H. (2016) Biogeographical evidences help revealing the origin of Hainan Island. PLoS ONE 11(4): e0151941 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151941 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhu H., Yan L.C. (2009) Biogeographical affinities of the flora of southeastern Yunnan, China. Botanical Studies 50(4): 467–475. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tapponnier P., Pelter G., Armijo R., Le Dain A.Y. & Cobbold P. (1982) Propagation extrusion tectonics in Asia: new insights from simple experiments with plasticine. Geology 10: 611–616. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tapponnier P., Lacassin R., Leloup P.H., Schärer U., Zhong D.L., Liu X.H., et al. (1990) The Ailao Shan/Red River metamorphic belt: Tertiary left-lateral shear between Indochina and South China. Nature 343: 431–437. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lee T.Y. & Lawver L.A. (1995) Cenozoic plate reconstruction of Southeast Asia. Tectonophysics 251: 85–138. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Leloup P.H., Laeassin R., Tapponnier P., Scharer U., Zhong D.L., Liu X., et al. (1995) The Ailao Shan—Red River shear zone (Yunnan, China), Tertiary transform boundary of Indochina. Tectonophysics 251:3–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Metcalfea I. (2011) Tectonic framework and Phanerozoic evolution of Sundaland. Gondwana Research 19: 3–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Metcalfe I. (2013) Gondwana dispersion and Asian accretion: Tectonic and palaeogeographic evolution of eastern Tethys. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 66: 1–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Metcalfea I. & Aung K.P. (2014) LateTournaisian conodonts from the Taungnyo Group near Loi Kaw, Myanmar (Burma): Implications for Shan Plateau stratigraphy and evolution of the Gondwana-derived Sibumasu Terrane. Gondwana Research 26: 1159–1172. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fortey R.A. & Cocks L. R. M. (1998) Biogeography and palaeogeography of the Sibumasu terrene in the Ordovician: a review In: Hall R. & Holloway J.D. (ed.). Biogeography and Geological Evolution of SE Asia. Leiden: Backbuys Publishers, 43–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jain A. K. (2014) When dis India-Asia collide and make the Himalaya? Current Science 106, 254–266. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Watkinson I. & Holloway J.D. (2008). The kinematic history of the Khlong Marui and Ranong Faults. Journal of Structural Geology 30: 1554–1571. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mitchell A.H.G. (1993) Cretaceous-Cenozoic tectonic events in the western Myanmar (Burma)-Assam region. Journal of the Geological Society, London 150: 1089–1102. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Table. Native seed plant list in Lao PDR.

(The circumscriptions of families follow APG III, and species nomenclature follows w3TROPICOS (http://mobot.mobot.org/W3T/Search/vast.html).

(XLS)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its supporting information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES