Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 22;8(22):36171–36184. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15609

Table 2. Stratification analysis for tumor GGT expression and overall survival of GC patients.

GC Patients (n=322)
No. of Cases HR (95% CI) Adjusted HR (95% CI)
TNM stage
 Stage0, I & II 138 1.93 (0.98-3.60) 1.88 (0.94-3.56)
 Stage III & IV 178 1.63 (1.11-2.36) 1.63 (1.10-2.39)
Tumor locationa
 Proximal 59 1.26 (0.55-2.60) 1.19 (0.51-2.59)
 Body 67 1.21 (0.63-2,27) 1.48 (0.76-2.85)
 Distal 175 2.45 (1.51-3.88) 2.40 (1.46-3.86)
Tumor Grade
 Low 202 1.91 (1.27-2.80) 1.98 (1.31-2.96)
 Moderate 78 2.20 (1.11-4.24) 2.09 (1.02-2.96)
 High 42 1.72 (0.59-5.04) 2.40 (0.74-7.91)
Histological subtype
 Papillary & Tubular 77 2.16 (1.10-4.33) 2.20 (1.10-4.50)
 Mucinous & Signet 84 3.81 (1.53-8.25) 4.0 (1.58-8.87)
 Ring Cell
 Undifferentiated 161 1.64 (1.05-2.50) 1.65 (1.04-2.56)
Her2
 Negative 185 1.56 (0.95-2.45) 1.64 (0.99-2.59)
 Positive 94 2.41 (1.39-4.18) 2.42 (1.35-4.35)
Chemotherapy
 No 169 2.17 (1.39-3.30) 2.14 (1.38-3.27)
 Yes 153 1.54 (0.92-2.47) 1.52 (0.91-2.48)

NOTE: Multivariate COX proportional hazard analysis was conducted to evaluate HR of GGT high versus low, tumor GGT low group was used as reference. The HRs were adjusted by sex and age at diagnosis.

*Statistical significant on COX proportional hazard analysis, p<0.05

a,11 cases of “whole” (linitis plastica) are not analyzed due to insufficient numbers.