Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 22;5:e3493. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3493

Table A1. Raw data from the experiment on the effect of ablation of butterfly (Callophrys xami) hindwing tails (“false antennae”) on hindwing movement (HWM) and capture by female mantis (Stagmomantis limbata).

Control butterflies were manipulated in the same way as experimental butterflies but their hindwing tails were not ablated.

Treatment Mantis code Butterflya HWM Result
Control 4 37-F No Capturedb
Control 11 14-M No Captured
Control T 106-F No Captured
Control X 117-F No Captured
Control 1 1-M Yes Captured
Control 11 126-M Yes Captured
Control 15 90-F Yes Captured
Control Z 78-F Yes Capturedb
Control 5 39-M No Escaped
Control 13 94-M No Escaped
Control 1 38-M Yes Escapedb
Control 12 86-M Yes Escaped
Control 16 92-M Yes Escaped
Control 17 127-F Yes Escaped
Tails ablated 14 70-M No Captured
Tails ablated 14 102-F No Captured
Tails ablated 1E 68-M No Captured
Tails ablated 2E 60-M No Captured
Tails ablated A 101-F No Captured
Tails ablated T 128-F No Captured
Tails ablated 7 33-F Yes Captured
Tails ablated 15 119-M Yes Captured
Tails ablated 10 8-M No Escaped
Tails ablated 6 42-F No Escaped
Tails ablated 5 18-M Yes Escaped
Tails ablated X 129-F Yes Escaped

Notes.

a

M, male; F, female.

b

Interaction not recorded in Video S1.