Abstract
Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) have distinct capability for renal repair, but may have safety concerns. MSC-derived extracellular vesicles emerged as a novel non-cellular alternative. Using a porcine model of metabolic syndrome and renal artery stenosis we tested whether extracellular vesicles attenuate renal inflammation, and if this capacity is mediated by their cargo of the anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin (IL)10. Pigs with metabolic syndrome were studied after 16 weeks of renal artery stenosis untreated or treated four weeks earlier with a single intrarenal delivery of extracellular vesicles harvested from adipose tissue-derived autologous MSCs. Lean and sham metabolic syndrome animals served as controls (seven each). Five additional pigs with metabolic syndrome and renal artery stenosis received extracellular vesicles with pre-silenced IL10 (IL10 knock-down). Single-kidney renal blood flow, glomerular filtration rate, and oxygenation were studied in vivo and renal injury pathways ex vivo. Retention of extracellular vesicles in the stenotic-kidney peaked two days after delivery and decreased thereafter. Four weeks after injection, extracellular vesicle fragments co-localized with stenotic-kidney tubular cells and macrophages, indicating internalization or fusion. Extracellular vesicle delivery attenuated renal inflammation, improved medullary oxygenation and fibrosis. Renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate fell in metabolic syndrome and renal artery stenosis compared to metabolic syndrome, but was restored in pigs treated with extracellular vesicles. These renoprotective effects were blunted in pigs treated with IL10-depleted extracellular vesicles. Thus, extracellular vesicle-based regenerative strategies might be useful for patients with metabolic syndrome and renal artery stenosis.
Keywords: metabolic syndrome, renal artery stenosis, mesenchymal stem cells, extracellular vesicles, interleukin-10
INTRODUCTION
Advances in regenerative medicine have uncovered a distinct potential of mesenchymal/stromal cells (MSCs) for kidney repair1, which resides in their remarkable anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties. We have previously shown that intra-renal delivery of autologous adipose tissue-derived MSCs decreased inflammation and improved function in the stenotic-kidney of pigs with non-atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RAS)2, 3 or with atherosclerotic RAS undergoing revascularization4, 5. However, concerns regarding safety and transplantation of viable replicating cells, such as induction of tumors, malformations, or microinfarctions, may limit their translational capacity6.
MSCs are avid producers of extracellular vesicles (EVs), including microvesicles (50–1000nm in size), formed by outward budding and fission of the plasma membrane, and exosomes (40–100nm), formed in multi-vesicular bodies and released upon fusion with the membrane7. MSC-derived EVs shuttle functional components capable of reducing tissue injury and/or enhancing repair in recipient cells, thereby mediating MSC paracrine action8. We have recently shown that cultured porcine adipose tissue-derived MSCs release EVs that contain genes and proteins capable of modulating inflammation, angiogenesis, adipogenesis, and other pathways in recipient cells9, 10. Indeed, delivery of EVs derived from MSCs has been shown to restore renal structure and function in experimental rodent models of acute renal failure11–14. However, their ability to rescue kidney function in chronic renal injury in a large preclinical animal model is unknown. Moreover, the mechanisms associated with MSC-derived EV renoprotective effect remain to be defined.
Interleukin (IL)-10 is an anti-inflammatory cytokine that regulates the functions of immune cells, and a key determinant of “alternatively” activated (M2) macrophage phenotype. Macrophages can change their expression profile in response to insults, and their effector phenotype determines the nature and severity of renal injury15. “Classically” activated (M1) macrophages express pro-inflammatory cytokines, whereas M2 macrophages attenuate inflammation and promote tissue repair. We have previously shown that IL-10 expression is blunted in both porcine2 and human16 stenotic kidneys, and correlates inversely with tubular injury score and renal fibrosis17. Furthermore, MSC delivery into the stenotic kidney favored a phenotypic switch from M1 to M2 macrophages and improved IL-10 expression, as well as renal function and structure2, 3, suggesting that this cytokine might be implicated in the MSC-induced reparative process. However, whether IL-10 mediates the paracrine actions of the MSC progeny EVs to preserve kidneys subjected to chronic ischemia has not been directly explored.
The current study took advantage of a novel porcine model of coexisting metabolic syndrome (MetS) and RAS (MetS+RAS), comorbidities that accentuate renal inflammation, associated with prominent glomerular and tubular alterations18. We studied the temporal pattern of EV uptake and distribution, and tested the hypothesis that intra-renal delivery of autologous MSC-derived EVs would attenuate inflammation, ameliorating structural and functional decline in the MetS+RAS kidney. Furthermore, we tested whether the renoprotective properties of EVs are partly determined by their cargo of IL-10.
RESULTS
MetS+RAS
MetS+RAS was achieved by inducing unilateral RAS in domestic pigs 6 weeks after initiating a high cholesterol/carbohydrate diet. MetS pigs were studied in-vivo and ex-vivo after 10 weeks of RAS untreated or treated 4 weeks earlier with a single intrarenal delivery of EVs harvested from autologous adipose tissue-derived MSCs, or saline vehicle (Figure 1A). The systemic characteristics in all pigs 4 weeks after EV delivery or sham are summarized in Table 1. Body weight and blood pressure were similarly higher in all MetS groups compared to Lean. All RAS groups developed a moderate but significant stenosis of a similar degree (p>0.05 ANOVA). Common to the chronic phase of untreated RAS, plasma renin activity (PRA) levels were similar among the groups. Lipid fraction levels were comparably elevated in all MetS groups compared to Lean, and their fasting insulin and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) levels were significantly higher. Yet, fasting glucose levels did not differ among the groups, indicating non-diabetic MetS19.
Table 1.
Lean | MetS | MetS+RAS | MetS+RAS+EVs | MetS+RAS+IL10KD EVs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Body weight (Kg) | 71.1±4.0 | 93.4±0.9* | 92.4±2.3* | 90.6±3.1* | 86.9±3.0* |
MAP (mmHg) | 102.8±3.6 | 124.2±4.0* | 128.8±6.7* | 120.0±3.4* | 116.9±3.9* |
Degree of stenosis (%) | 0 | 0 | 61.4±7.6* | 61.3±4.3* | 68.0±6.4* |
Total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 82.5 (76.0–90.5) | 347.0 (330.0–517.5)* | 390.0 (336.0–426.0)* | 413.0 (315.5–529.8)* | 420.0 (323.5–534.0)* |
Triglycerides (mg/dl) | 8.0 (5.8–11.3) | 14.0 (13.0–25.5)* | 13.0 (5.0–20.0)* | 14.5 (8.3–16.8)* | 13.0 (10.5–18.0)* |
HDL cholesterol (mg/dl) | 47.0 (42.5–52.5) | 140.0 (110.5–167.0)* | 110.0 (98.0–172.0)* | 126.0 (106.0–166.8)* | 107.0 (104.0–154.0)* |
LDL cholesterol (mg/dl) | 33.4±6.5 | 398.4±140.4* | 319.6±128.5* | 314.3±119.6* | 416.4±114.3* |
Fasting insulin (μU/ml) | 0.4 (0.3–0.5) | 0.7 (0.7–0.8)* | 0.7 (0.7–0.8)* | 0.7 (0.7–0.8)* | 0.7 (0.7–0.8)* |
HOMA-IR score | 0.6 (0.6–0.7) | 1.9 (1.4–1.9)* | 1.9 (1.8–2.0)* | 1.9 (1.7–2.0)* | 1.9 (1.8–2.0)* |
Fasting glucose (mg/dl) | 129.5±36.1 | 116.2±22.7 | 112.1±27.6 | 103.5±28.3 | 124.8±36.7 |
Serum creatinine (mg/dl) | 1.47±0.23 | 1.54±0.18 | 1.77±0.23*† | 1.45±0.37‡ | 1.92±0.19* |
PRA (ng/ml/h) | 0.14±0.09 | 0.15±0.08 | 0.21±0.11 | 0.14±0.12 | 0.15±0.17 |
Renal volume (ml) | 137.2±6.4 | 217.9±7.4* | 182.4±8.8*† | 207.4±29.1*‡ | 189.3±15.6* |
RBF (ml/min) | 502.1±27.4 | 848.6±76.1* | 628.5±27.5*† | 866.1±104.1*‡ | 447.8±85.2†‡ |
GFR (ml/min) | 76.0±4.0 | 142.6±7.3* | 100.3±7.1*† | 128.7±13.6*‡ | 82.7±12.5† |
IL10KD: Interleukin-10 knockdown; MAP: Mean arterial pressure; PRA: Plasma renin activity; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; HOMA-IR: homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, RBF: renal blood flow; GFR: glomerular filtration rate.
p<0.05 vs. Lean;
p<0.05 vs. MetS;
p<0.05 vs. MetS+RAS
MSC and EV characterization
Cultured MSCs expressed typical markers, and trans-differentiated into osteocytes, chondrocytes, and adipocytes, as typical to MSC3, 4, 20. Transmission and scanning electron microscopy demonstrated that they secreted substantial amounts of EVs (Figure 1B). NanoSight analysis revealed that 10×10ˆ6 MSCs/kg cultured for 72hr released 1×10ˆ10 EVs/ml. Their size distribution indicated that MSC-derived EVs included about 2/3 small microvesicles (~150 nm in size) and 1/3 exosomes (~50 nm) (Figure 1C), and Western blotting demonstrated expression of characteristic EV and MSC markers (Figure 1D).
EVs engrafted and decreased inflammation in the stenotic kidney
EVs were labeled with a red fluorescent dye and subsequently injected into the stenotic renal artery. Pigs were euthanized at time intervals after intra-renal EV injection. Labeled EVs were tracked in frozen sections from the heart, lungs, liver, spleen, and both kidneys, and their retention calculated. Retention of EVs in the stenotic kidney peaked at 2 days (~9% of injected amount) and decreased thereafter, remaining at ~2% by 4 weeks after injection (Figure 2D). Other initial major retention sites included the liver, lung, and spleen (peaking at 45%, 40%, and 15%, respectively). EVs were also detected in small proportion in the heart and contralateral kidney.
Four weeks after intra-renal administration, red fluorescent signal was detected within the damaged kidney, but not in stenotic kidney sections of untreated animals (Figure 2A). To determine the nature of the red fluorescent signal, we performed immunofluorescence staining with antibodies against exosome (CD9) and microvesicle (CD63) markers. Only a fraction of red-stained particles co-localized with CD9, and none with CD63 (Figure 2B), Suggesting that the red fluorescent signal was attributable to EV fragments rather than intact EVs retained within cells. EV Fragments co-localized with phaseolus vulgaris erythroagglutinin (PHA-E+), peanut agglutinin (PA+), and CD68+, suggesting EV engraftment in proximal and distal tubular cells, as well as macrophages (Figure 2C).
The number of infiltrating inflammatory M1 macrophages, which was higher in MetS compared to Lean kidneys, further increased in MetS+RAS, but decreased in MetS+RAS+EVs pigs (Figure 3A–B). In contrast, fewer reparative M2 macrophages were observed in MetS and MetS+RAS compared to Lean kidneys, but their number was normalized in EV-treated pigs (Figure 3A–C). Consequently, M1/M2 ratio, higher in MetS compared to Lean, further increased in MetS+RAS, but decreased in MetS+RAS+EVs pigs (Figure 3D).
Macrophages exacerbate renal injury by secreting pro-inflammatory cytokines. In blood samples collected from the renal vein, levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines monocyte-chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, IL-6, and IL-1β were elevated in MetS+RAS, but decreased in MetS+RAS+EVs pigs (Figure 4A). Conversely, both renal vein levels and tissue immunoreactivity of IL-10 were reduced in MetS and MetS+RAS compared to Lean, but normalized in MetS+RAS+EVs (Figure 4AB). Tubulointerstitial IL-4 co-localized with IL-10, and similar to IL-10 its immunoreactivity was reduced in MetS compared to Lean, further decreased in MetS+RAS, but normalized in MetS+RAS+EVs (Figure 4B).
EVs attenuated renal hypoxia and fibrosis
Production of pro-inflammatory cytokines can evoke renal hypoxia and fibrosis. Medullary hypoxia assessed using blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD)-MRI showed similarly elevated BOLD-R2* index in MetS and MetS+RAS, which decreased to normal levels in MetS+RAS+EVs (Figure 5A–B). Tubulo-interstitial fibrosis (trichrome staining) increased in MetS+RAS compared to Lean and MetS, and slightly but significantly decreased in MetS+RAS+EVs (Figure 5A–C), as did glomerular score (Figure 5D).
EVs restored renal function
Renal hemodynamics and function were assessed with multi-detector CT (MDCT). Single-kidney volume, RBF and GFR, which were higher in all MetS compared to Lean, decreased in MetS+RAS, but did not differ from MetS in EV-treated MetS+RAS pigs (Table 1). Serum creatinine also normalized in MetS+RAS+EVs.
EV renoprotective effects were blunted by IL10 knock-down (IL10KD)
IL10 mRNA expression was 100-fold higher in EVs compared to their parent MSCs (Figure 6A), and IL-4 protein expression was enriched (Figure 6B). To establish the role of IL10 in mediating the renoprotective effect of MSC-derived EVs, MSCs were incubated with siRNA for this anti-inflammatory cytokine. The resultant IL10KD MSCs were characterized by decreased IL10 mRNA and protein expression (Figure 6C–D), and their daughter IL10KD-EVs by lower IL10 mRNA expression (Figure 6E).
These IL10KD-EVs were then delivered into the renal artery of 5 additional MetS+RAS pigs. Four weeks later stenotic-kidney volume, RBF, and GFR, which all improved in MetS+RAS+EVs, were not different from those in untreated MetS+RAS (Table 1), and serum creatinine showed a similar pattern (Table 1). The number of M1 and their ratio to M2 macrophages in the kidney failed to decline (Figure 3A–D), and renal vein levels and tissue immunoreactivity of IL-10 and IL-4 that improved in MetS+RAS+EVs remained downregulated in MetS+RAS+IL10KD-EVs (Figure 4A–B). Furthermore, renal vein levels of MCP-1, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β that decreased in MetS+RAS+EVs also remained upregulated in MetS+RAS+IL10KD-EVs (Figure 4A). Lastly, medullary hypoxia, tubulo-interstitial fibrosis, and glomerular score were not attenuated in MetS+RAS+IL10KD-EVs (Figure 5A–D).
DISCUSSION
Our study demonstrates that a single intra-renal delivery of MSC-derived EVs improves renal structure and function in experimental MetS+RAS. Restoration of stenotic-kidney GFR was associated with decreased inflammation, medullary hypoxia, and fibrosis, positioning EVs as a novel therapeutic approach to ameliorate chronic renal injury and dysfunction induced by coexisting MetS and RAS. Furthermore, our study suggests that at least some of the salutary effects of EVs are mediated by their cargo of IL-10, as they were abolished in MetS+RAS+IL-10KD-EV-treated pigs.
MSCs possess potent anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties, which render them an attractive tool to attenuate kidney damage1. We have shown in porcine atherosclerotic and non-atherosclerotic RAS that MSC delivery reduced inflammation and restored function in the post-stenotic kidney2–5. The current study extends our previous observations, demonstrating that stenotic kidney structure and function are also preserved four weeks after delivery of MSC-derived EVs, This tool may therefore be useful, as EVs circumvent concerns about extensive expansion, cryopreservation, complications, and mal-differentiation of live replicating MSC.
MSCs produce large amount of EVs that can be internalized into other cells and activate anti-inflammatory signaling by delivering protein and genetic content7, 8. We have previously found that EVs emanating from porcine MSCs contain mRNA and proteins that regulate several cellular pathways9, 10. Furthermore, incorporation of MSC-derived EVs in acutely injured renal proximal tubular cells modulates the expression of genes involved in cell recovery and repair by shuttling mRNA involved in transcription, proliferation, and immunoregulation11. However, their efficacy in chronic renal injury remained unclear.
To test the in-vivo efficacy of MSC-derived EVs, we utilized a novel domestic porcine model of MetS+RAS that replicates human disease conditions. We have previously shown in obese Ossabaw pigs that MetS induces renal inflammation and microvascular loss21, which were aggravated by superimposition of RAS18. Given these characteristics of the stenotic MetS kidney, we selected the porcine MetS+RAS model to test the efficacy of MSC-derived EVs to ameliorate chronic renal injury. This study shows that MSCs isolated from porcine adipose tissue release EVs that express typical EV and MSC markers. While similar to other nanoparticles the majority of these EV might be taken up by the reticuloendothelial system22, at 2 days after injections up to 10% were observed within the stenotic kidney. By 4 weeks their stenotic kidney retention declined to ~2%, yet their beneficial effects lingered.
We found that four weeks after delivery, EV fragments co-stained with CD68, suggesting uptake by macrophages, or were retained within PA+ and PHA-E+ cells, suggesting incorporation into proximal and distal tubules. Only a small fraction of EVs remained intact four weeks after administration, denoted by red-labeled particles co-localizing with EV markers. Taken together, these observations are consistent with the postulated capability of EVs to be internalized, and potentially transfer their content to recipient cells11.
Notably, internalization of MSC-derived EVs by macrophages was accompanied by reduced renal inflammation, a major pathological characteristic of MetS that mediates many of its harmful sequelae. We have previously detected elevated renal vein levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the post-stenotic human kidney, associated with decreased renal function, underscoring the contribution of inflammation to kidney injury16, 23. Additionally, we have demonstrated in obese Ossabaw pigs predominance of pro-inflammatory (M1) compared to trophic (M2) macrophages populating the stenotic kidney18, providing the impetus for targeted therapies to prevent post-stenotic M1 macrophage accumulation and/or drive the phenotypic shift to M2 macrophages. MSCs appear to be suitable for this purpose, as their co-culture with activated monocytes or delivery into the porcine RAS kidney decrease M1 and increase M2 marker expression2. The current study extends these observations and underscores the ability of MSC-derived EV progeny to reverse chronic MetS+RAS-induced renal inflammation, evidenced by a phenotypic switch of macrophages from M1 to M2, which is likely mediated by IL-10. Indeed, renal expression of the M2 cytokine IL-10, which was downregulated in MetS and MetS+RAS, normalized in EV-treated pigs. Likewise, immunoreactivity of IL-4, which was also enriched in EVs, normalized in MetS+RAS+EVs, supporting its role in mediating macrophage polarization towards an M2 phenotype24. Furthermore, EV delivery decreased renal vein levels of the M1 pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6, as well as renal vein levels of MCP-1, a pro-inflammatory cytokine that mediates M1 macrophage recruitment25. Conceivably, the anti-inflammatory effect of EVs on the MetS+RAS kidney might be related to their internalization not only by macrophages, but also by tubular cells, which produce inflammatory cytokines that contribute to macrophage polarization26.
In this study, MetS+RAS-induced renal inflammation was associated with increased medullary hypoxia, a condition that triggers a vicious cycle of progressive kidney injury and fibrosis, and represents a common pathway to end-stage renal disease27. Inflammation and hypoxia are closely linked by an increase in cellular metabolic demand and oxidative stress28. Activation of inflammatory pathways within the stenotic kidney, including macrophage accumulation and subsequent release of inflammatory cytokines, has been implicated in the development of hypoxia in the medulla29, which is particularly vulnerable to hypoxia. Indeed, we found that medullary hypoxia was elevated in MetS and MetS+RAS groups, but decreased in pigs treated with MSC-derived EVs, possibly due to their ability to reduce renal inflammation.
Furthermore, MetS+RAS-induced fibrosis was attenuated in EV-treated pigs, likely secondary to amelioration of inflammation. Macrophage infiltrates are common in stenotic kidneys of RAS patients with reduced RBF and correlate with tubular atrophy and fibrosis30. Glomerulosclerosis also decreased in MetS+RAS+EVs, suggesting that EVs confer tubular and glomerular protection. Congruently, stenotic-kidney RBF was diminished in MetS+RAS compared to MetS, but increased in MetS+RAS+EVs, associated with increased renal function, reflected as decreased serum creatinine and increased stenotic-kidney GFR. Incidentally, restoration of RBF and GFR to levels comparable to MetS might hypothetically reflect restoration of renal hyperfiltration. Nevertheless, this was associated with several beneficial effects conferred by EVs in the stenotic MetS kidney, such as decreased inflammation, fibrosis, and glomerulosclerosis, underscoring the potential of this intervention to mitigate renal injury. Further studies are needed to determine the long-term effect of this maneuver in MetS.
Given the prominent inflammatory component and predominance of M1 macrophages in MetS+RAS, we tested the role of the EV cargo of IL-10 in their beneficial effects. This anti-inflammatory cytokine has been shown to modulate renal repair in mice with ischemia-reperfusion injury31. Furthermore, IL-10-deficient mice with glomerulonephritis develop histologically and functionally more severe renal injury than wild-type mice, implying that IL-10 regulates many aspects of renal function32. In this study, we found that EVs were markedly enriched with IL10 mRNA compared to their parent MSCs, and when incorporated into renal cells, upregulated IL-10 renal expression. IL-10 silencing decreased its mRNA and protein expression in MSC, and increased renal release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and M1/M2 macrophage ratio. Notably, many of the renoprotective effects of EVs were blunted in pigs treated with IL10-depleted EVs, underscoring the role of this anti-inflammatory cytokine in mediating EV-induced renal recovery. Interestingly, IL-10 silencing decreased IL-4 immunoreactivity and increased M1/M2 ratio, suggesting that these cytokines may act in concert to induce a phenotypic switch of macrophages from M1 to M2. Further studies are needed to explore the interaction between IL-10 and IL-4 in the post-stenotic kidney.
Remarkably, intra-renal administration of IL10 KD EVs had a profound effect on GFR, which became significantly lower than that of MetS+RAS. The mechanisms by which IL-10 deficiency decreased GFR remain elusive, but IL10 is known to counterbalance inflammatory cytokines, which remain unopposed in its absence33. In turn, renal hypoxia and elevated release of inflammatory markers may trigger parenchymal injury and interfere with renal functional recovery17. In the current study, we found that treatment with IL10KD-EVs aggravated medullary hypoxia, inflammation, and fibrosis, which are all important determinants of GFR. Therefore, alterations in these pathways may partly explain the profound effect on GFR seen in IL10KD EV-treated pigs.
Our study is limited by the short duration of MetS and RAS and by the use of relatively young pigs, which might influence their interaction with pathological factors involved in disease progression. Our MetS pigs developed obesity, hyperlipidemia, glucose intolerance (as per HOMA-IR), and hypertension, yet superimposition of RAS did not further increase blood pressure, possibly due to the relatively moderate nature of the stenosis. Importantly, post-stenotic injury and dysfunction in our porcine model closely mimic those observed in humans30. The mechanisms regulating EV engraftment remain to be determined, but speculatively damaged tubular cells might express cognate ligands and receptors to enhance their uptake. Indeed, we found that EVs expressed the surface receptors CD9, CD29, and CD63, adhesion molecules that facilitate EV incorporation into cells34. Yet, phagocytosis might be the primary mechanism responsible for EV internalization into macrophages. Future research is needed to develop strategies to augment renal EV uptake and retention.
In summary, our study identified a potency of EVs isolated from adipose tissue-derived MSCs for ameliorating renal injury in chronic experimental MetS+RAS. Intra-renal delivery of MSC-EVs decreased renal inflammation, increased the number of reparative macrophages, and upregulated expression of IL-10, suggesting that anti-inflammatory properties underpin the protective effects of EVs on the stenotic-kidney. Furthermore, EVs attenuated renal fibrosis, ultimately improving stenotic kidney function. Notably, their beneficial effects were blunted in MetS+RAS pigs that received IL10KD-EVs, supporting an important contribution of this cytokine to several aspects of renal function. The current study is therefore an important step before clinical translation of this tool. Future studies are needed to establish the long-term effects, optimal timing, and dose of EVs, and determine their efficacy in humans.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved this study. Thirty-three domestic female pigs were studied during 16wks of observation. At baseline, 26 pigs started high-cholesterol/high carbohydrate diet (MetS)19, while 7 were fed regular pig chow (Lean).
Six weeks later, animals were anesthetized with 0.25g of IM tiletamine hydrochloride/zolazepam hydrochloride and 0.5g of xylazine, and maintained with intravenous ketamine (0.2mg/kg/min) and xylazine (0.03mg/kg/min). RAS was induced in 19 MetS pigs by placing a local-irritant coil in the main renal artery35. Sham renal angiography was performed in 7 Lean and 7 MetS pigs. In all animals randomized to receive EVs, fat tissue was collected at that time, which was subsequently used to harvest autologous MSCs and isolate their EVs.
Six weeks later, the degree of stenosis was determined by angiography. EVs (1×10ˆ10) were pre-harvested from the autologous adipose-tissue-derived MSCs, dose commonly used for intra-renal delivery. EVs with (n=5) or without (n=7) pre-silenced IL-10 were suspended in PBS and injected into the stenotic kidney of MetS+RAS over 5min through a 5F catheter positioned proximal to the stenosis.
Four weeks later, pigs were again similarly anesthetized, systemic blood samples collected for lipid panels, PRA, and serum creatinine measurements. Fasting glucose and insulin levels were measured by standard procedures, and the HOMA-IR calculated as an index of insulin resistance19. Single-kidney hemodynamics and function were assessed using MDCT and oxygenation by BOLD-MRI.
One week after later, animals were euthanized with an intravenous bolus of 100mg/kg of sodium pentobarbital36. The stenotic or right kidneys were dissected, and sections frozen in liquid nitrogen (and maintained at −80°C) or preserved in formalin for ex-vivo studies.
In-vivo studies
BOLD MRI studies were performed on a 3 Tesla to measure intra-renal oxygenation (R2*), as previously described5, 21, 37, 38.
MDCT scanning was performed to assess single-kidney volume, regional perfusion, RBF, and GFR, as shown17, 39–41.
Ex-vivo studies
MSC and EV isolation, characterization, and culture
Abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (5–10g) was collected from pigs 4wks after induction of RAS or sham, processed for MSC isolation using collagenase, and cultured with advanced MEM medium supplemented with platelet lysate42. MSCs were kept in cell recovery medium for phenotype/function analysis. MSCs were characterized by the expression of CD44, CD90, and CD105, and lack of expression of CD45, CD34, CD14 surface molecules using immunofluorescent staining and flow-cytometry4, 9, 43. MSC characterization was confirmed by their trans-differentiation into to adipocytes, chondrocytes, and osteocytes, as described3, 4, 20. Transmission and scanning electron microscopy was performed to investigate size and structure of MSC-derived EVs.
EVs were obtained from supernatants of 10×10ˆ6 MSCs, cultured in advanced MEM medium without supplements, and ultra-centrifuged twice, as shown9. 75,000 cells release approximately 15μg of EVs overnight (Figure 1B). Briefly, after centrifugation at 2000g, supernatants were ultra-centrifuged at 100,000g, washed in serum-free medium 199 containing HEPES 25mM, and underwent a second ultra-centrifugation. Pellets were suspended, and protein content quantified. Endotoxin contamination was excluded by Limulus testing, and EVs stored at −80°C11. Concentration and size distribution of isolated EVs was assessed by nanoparticle tracking analysis. EVs from MSCs were then characterized based on the expression of the EV (CD9, CD29, CD63) and MSC (CD73, CD105) markers by Western blot. EV and MSC mRNA content of IL-10 were measured by real time PCR using spike-in methods (luciferase control mRNA as exogenous RNA). In addition, IL10 and IL4 protein expression was measured by by Western blot2.
EV tracking and tissue distribution
EVs were labeled prior to delivery with the red fluorescence PKH26. Their localization was evaluated in 5μm stenotic kidney sections by immunofluorescence staining with the exosome marker CD9, the microvesicle marker CD63, the distal tubular marker PA, the proximal tubular marker PHA-E, and the macrophage marker CD6843.
In addition, we assessed biodistribution of MSC-derived EVs in 8 additional pigs euthanized 3h, 2d, 7d, or 4wks after intrarenal EV injection (n=2 each). Labeled EVs were tracked and counted in frozen sections from the heart, lungs, liver, spleen, and both kidneys, and their relative retention calculated at each time point and expressed as % of injected amount.
Renal injury pathways
Renal inflammation was evaluated by immunostaining with antibodies detecting CD68+/inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS)+ (M1) and CD68+/Arginase-1+ (M2) macrophages2. Renal vein levels of MCP-1 were measured by ELISA17, and TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, and IL-10 levels by Luminex. Renal expression of IL-10 and IL-4 was measured by immunofluorescent staining. Tubulo-interstitial fibrosis and glomerular score were quantified in renal sections stained with Masson’s trichrome44.
Statistical methods
Statistical analysis was performed using JMP (SAS). Results were expressed as mean±SD or median (interquartile range). Parametric (ANOVA/Student t-test) and nonparametric (Wilcoxon/Kruskal-Wallis) tests were used as appropriate. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This study was partly supported by NIH grant numbers DK102325, DK73608, DK104273, HL123160, and DK106427, and by the Mayo Clinic Center for Regenerative Medicine.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
DISCLOSURE
All the authors declare no competing interests.
References
- 1.Eirin A, Lerman LO. Mesenchymal stem cell treatment for chronic renal failure. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2014;5:83. doi: 10.1186/scrt472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Eirin A, Zhang X, Zhu XY, et al. Renal vein cytokine release as an index of renal parenchymal inflammation in chronic experimental renal artery stenosis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29:274–282. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gft305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhu XY, Urbieta-Caceres V, Krier JD, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial progenitor cells decrease renal injury in experimental swine renal artery stenosis through different mechanisms. Stem Cells. 2013;31:117–125. doi: 10.1002/stem.1263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Eirin A, Zhu XY, Krier JD, et al. Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells improve revascularization outcomes to restore renal function in swine atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. Stem Cells. 2012;30:1030–1041. doi: 10.1002/stem.1047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ebrahimi B, Eirin A, Li Z, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells improve medullary inflammation and fibrosis after revascularization of swine atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. PLoS One. 2013;8:e67474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kunter U, Rong S, Boor P, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells prevent progressive experimental renal failure but maldifferentiate into glomerular adipocytes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18:1754–1764. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2007010044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yeo RW, Lai RC, Zhang B, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell: an efficient mass producer of exosomes for drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65:336–341. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lai RC, Chen TS, Lim SK. Mesenchymal stem cell exosome: a novel stem cell-based therapy for cardiovascular disease. Regen Med. 2011;6:481–492. doi: 10.2217/rme.11.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Eirin A, Riester SM, Zhu XY, et al. MicroRNA and mRNA cargo of extracellular vesicles from porcine adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Gene. 2014;551:55–64. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2014.08.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Eirin A, Zhu XY, Puranik AS, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of extracellular vesicles isolated from porcine adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cells. Sci Rep. 2016;6:36120. doi: 10.1038/srep36120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bruno S, Grange C, Deregibus MC, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived microvesicles protect against acute tubular injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:1053–1067. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008070798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bonventre JV. Microvesicles from mesenchymal stromal cells protect against acute kidney injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:927–928. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2009030322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bruno S, Grange C, Collino F, et al. Microvesicles derived from mesenchymal stem cells enhance survival in a lethal model of acute kidney injury. PLoS One. 2012;7:e33115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Collino F, Bruno S, Incarnato D, et al. AKI Recovery Induced by Mesenchymal Stromal Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Carrying MicroRNAs. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014070710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ricardo SD, van Goor H, Eddy AA. Macrophage diversity in renal injury and repair. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:3522–3530. doi: 10.1172/JCI36150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Eirin A, Gloviczki ML, Tang H, et al. Inflammatory and injury signals released from the post-stenotic human kidney. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:540–548a. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Eirin A, Ebrahimi B, Zhang X, et al. Changes in glomerular filtration rate after renal revascularization correlate with microvascular hemodynamics and inflammation in Swine renal artery stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:720–728. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.972596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhang X, Li ZL, Woollard JR, et al. Obesity-metabolic derangement preserves hemodynamics but promotes intrarenal adiposity and macrophage infiltration in swine renovascular disease. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2013;305:F265–276. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00043.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pawar AS, Zhu XY, Eirin A, et al. Adipose tissue remodeling in a novel domestic porcine model of diet-induced obesity. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2015;23:399–407. doi: 10.1002/oby.20971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Eirin A, Zhu XY, Ferguson CM, et al. Intra-renal delivery of mesenchymal stem cells attenuates myocardial injury after reversal of hypertension in porcine renovascular disease. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6:7. doi: 10.1186/scrt541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Li Z, Woollard JR, Wang S, et al. Increased glomerular filtration rate in early metabolic syndrome is associated with renal adiposity and microvascular proliferation. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2011;301:F1078–1087. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00333.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.You J, Zhou J, Zhou M, et al. Pharmacokinetics, clearance, and biosafety of polyethylene glycol-coated hollow gold nanospheres. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2014;11:26. doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-11-26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Eirin A, Gloviczki ML, Tang H, et al. Chronic renovascular hypertension is associated with elevated levels of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27:4153–4161. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfs370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhao XN, Li YN, Wang YT. Interleukin-4 regulates macrophage polarization via the MAPK signaling pathway to protect against atherosclerosis. Genet Mol Res. 2016;15 doi: 10.4238/gmr.15017348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhu XY, Chade AR, Krier JD, et al. The chemokine monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 contributes to renal dysfunction in swine renovascular hypertension. J Hypertens. 2009;27:2063–2073. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283300192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wang Y, Chang J, Yao B, et al. Proximal tubule-derived colony stimulating factor-1 mediates polarization of renal macrophages and dendritic cells, and recovery in acute kidney injury. Kidney Int. 2015;88:1274–1282. doi: 10.1038/ki.2015.295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tanaka T, Nangaku M. The role of hypoxia, increased oxygen consumption, and hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha in progression of chronic kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2010;19:43–50. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0b013e3283328eed. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Eltzschig HK, Carmeliet P. Hypoxia and inflammation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:656–665. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0910283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Saad A, Herrmann SM, Textor SC. Chronic renal ischemia in humans: can cell therapy repair the kidney in occlusive renovascular disease? Physiology (Bethesda) 2015;30:175–182. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00065.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gloviczki ML, Keddis MT, Garovic VD, et al. TGF expression and macrophage accumulation in atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8:546–553. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06460612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wan X, Huang WJ, Chen W, et al. IL-10 deficiency increases renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Nephron Exp Nephrol. 2014;128:37–45. doi: 10.1159/000366130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kitching AR, Tipping PG, Timoshanko JR, et al. Endogenous interleukin-10 regulates Th1 responses that induce crescentic glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int. 2000;57:518–525. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00872.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Brito-Melo GE, Peruhype-Magalhaes V, Teixeira-Carvalho A, et al. IL-10 produced by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells emerge as a putative immunoregulatory mechanism to counterbalance the monocyte-derived TNF-alpha and guarantee asymptomatic clinical status during chronic HTLV-I infection. Clin Exp Immunol. 2007;147:35–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2006.03252.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mulcahy LA, Pink RC, Carter DR. Routes and mechanisms of extracellular vesicle uptake. J Extracell Vesicles. 2014;3 doi: 10.3402/jev.v3.24641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lerman LO, Schwartz RS, Grande JP, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of a novel swine model of renal artery stenosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999;10:1455–1465. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V1071455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Eirin A, Williams BJ, Ebrahimi B, et al. Mitochondrial targeted peptides attenuate residual myocardial damage after reversal of experimental renovascular hypertension. J Hypertens. 2014;32:154–165. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283658a53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ebrahimi B, Gloviczki M, Woollard JR, et al. Compartmental analysis of renal BOLD MRI data: introduction and validation. Invest Radiol. 2012;47:175–182. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318234e75b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ebrahimi B, Li Z, Eirin A, et al. Addition of endothelial progenitor cells to renal revascularization restores medullary tubular oxygen consumption in swine renal artery stenosis. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2012;302:F1478–1485. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00563.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Chade AR, Zhu X, Lavi R, et al. Endothelial progenitor cells restore renal function in chronic experimental renovascular disease. Circulation. 2009;119:547–557. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.788653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhu XY, Chade AR, Rodriguez-Porcel M, et al. Cortical microvascular remodeling in the stenotic kidney: role of increased oxidative stress. Arterioscler Throm Vasc Biol. 2004;24:1854–1859. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000142443.52606.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Krier JD, Ritman EL, Bajzer Z, et al. Noninvasive measurement of concurrent single-kidney perfusion, glomerular filtration, and tubular function. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2001;281:F630–638. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.2001.281.4.F630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Blande IS, Bassaneze V, Lavini-Ramos C, et al. Adipose tissue mesenchymal stem cell expansion in animal serum-free medium supplemented with autologous human platelet lysate. Transfusion (Paris) 2009;49:2680–2685. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02346.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Eirin A, Zhu XY, Ebrahimi B, et al. Intrarenal Delivery of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Endothelial Progenitor Cells Attenuates Hypertensive Cardiomyopathy in Experimental Renovascular Hypertension. Cell Transplant. 2015;24:2041–2053. doi: 10.3727/096368914X685582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Eirin A, Zhu XY, Li Z, et al. Endothelial outgrowth cells shift macrophage phenotype and improve kidney viability in swine renal artery stenosis. Arterioscler Throm Vasc Biol. 2013;33:1006–1013. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.301164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.