Skip to main content
Medicine logoLink to Medicine
. 2017 Jun 23;96(25):e6960. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006960

Efficacy of methylphenidate for the treatment of mental sequelae after traumatic brain injury

Wei-Tao Zhang a,, Ya-Fei Wang b,
Editor: Qinhong Zhang
PMCID: PMC5484184  PMID: 28640076

Abstract

Background:

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of methylphenidate for treating mental sequelae after traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Methods:

Thirty-six patients with TBI were randomly divided into the intervention group and placebo group. The participants in the intervention group received methylphenidate, while subjects in the placebo group were administered a placebo. This study was conducted from January 2014 to December 2016. The outcome measurements included Mental Fatigue Scale, Choice Reaction Time, Compensatory Tracking Task, Mental Arithmetic Test, Digit Symbol Substitution Test, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. In addition, safety was also recorded and assessed.

Results:

A total of 33 subjects completed the study. Methylphenidate showed greater efficacy than placebo, with decreased scores on the Mental Fatigue Scale, Choice Reaction Time, and Compensatory Tracking Task in the intervention group compared to the placebo group (P < .01, respectively). Furthermore, increased scores on the Mental Arithmetic Test, Digit Symbol Substitution Test, and MMSE in the intervention group, compared to those in the placebo group (P < .01 respectively), were observed. In addition, a significant difference in the scores on the BDI (P= .04) and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (P= .005) was observed between the 2 groups. The safety at the end of the 30 week-treatment was similar between the 2 groups (P > .05).

Conclusion:

The results of this study demonstrated that methylphenidate could effectively improve mental fatigue and cognitive functions in patients with TBI.

Keywords: mental sequelae, methylphenidate, randomized controlled trial, traumatic brain injury

1. Introduction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) often results from traffic-related and other accidents.[1] Patients with TBI may present various neuropsychiatric and mental sequelae, such as depression, sleep disorders, fatigue, cognitive impairments, headache, emotion instability, and sensitivity to stress.[210] Although many studies have been conducted for treating such conditions, no specific studies have focused on the treatment of mental sequelae after TBI.[11,12]

Currently, there are no effective therapies for treating mental sequelae after TBI. Although the guidelines recommend methylphenidate for deficits in attention and processing speed after TBI, there are no guidelines for mental sequelae treatment after TBI.[13]

Methylphenidate, which acts on the dopamine and noradrenergic systems, is known to block the reuptake of norepinephrine and dopamine into presynaptic neurons. It has been used for treating narcolepsy and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children.[14] Moreover, it has been reported to have controversial therapeutic potential against TBI-associated neurological sequelae.[15] In addition, it has been shown to have an effect on patients with TBI with cognitive impairment by affecting the speed of mental processing.[16] Furthermore, its pharmacological properties are similar to those of amphetamines. However, its exact mechanism of action for treating TBI mental sequelae is still unknown, although a previous study reported that it might act via activation of the brainstem arousal system, cortex, and subcortical structures.[17]

Currently, no existing randomized controlled trial has tested the effect of methylphenidate in patients with mental sequelae after TBI. In this study, we compared the effect of methylphenidate with that of placebo in patients with TBI in China. We tested the hypothesis that methylphenidate reduces mental fatigue and improves cognitive functions in patients with TBI.

2. Methods

2.1. Study design

This study was designed as a 30-week double-blinded randomized placebo-controlled trial. It was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of The People's Hospital of Yan’an and The People's Hospital of Ningxia from January 2014 to December 2016. Thirty-six patients with TBI with mental sequelae, including mental fatigue and cognitive impairment, were recruited and randomly assigned to the intervention group or placebo group in a 1:1 allocation ratio. All participants met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In addition, written informed consent was obtained from all the included patients.

2.2. Participants and recruitment

All subjects with TBI were recruited through the clinic at the department of neurosurgery at The People's Hospital of Yan’an and The People's Hospital of Ningxia from January 2014 to December 2016. All eligible patients were evaluated by clinical evaluation, physical examination, and brain computed tomography. After screening, the subjects were randomized to either the intervention or placebo group. All investigators were trained before this study. All subjects were informed about the research and given an information sheet; then, they were administered either methylphenidate or placebo.

2.3. Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria included age between 18 and 65 years; diagnosed based on the major depressive episode by Diagnositc and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders[18]; mild-to-moderate degree of TBI, according to a previously reported definition[19]; Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) score of ≥18[20]; Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of ≥20[21]; and the period of injury ranging from 2 weeks to 1 year.

Patients were excluded in case of multiple trauma that might affect the examinations; serious diseases, such as cancer; abnormal laboratory examinations; allergy to any drug; have been treated with neuroleptics, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and lithium within 4 weeks; involved in other clinical trials in the past 3 months; pregnancy; or if declined to participate.

2.4. Randomization and blinding

The randomization of this study was conducted by a statistician using SAS Software (version 8.3; SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC) with a computerized number generator. After the randomization, the allocation assignments of patients were concealed in opaque, sequentially numbered, and sealed envelopes. The patients, investigators, outcome assessor, and data analyst were all blinded to the intervention allocation.

2.5. Intervention

The comparison interventions were methylphenidate and placebo. Patients recruited to the intervention group received methylphenidate (flexibly titrated from 5 mg/d at the beginning, then gradually increased by 2.5 mg/d until reaching 20 mg/d). Patients were administered methylphenidate in equally divided doses at 8 am and 12 pm. The dose was selected based on a previous study.[22] Participants assigned to the placebo group received placebo at the same dose as the intervention group.

2.6. Outcome measurements

The primary outcomes were fatigue and cognitive functions. Fatigue was measured using the Mental Fatigue Scale.[23,24] The cognitive functions were evaluated by the Choice Reaction Time,[25] Compensatory Tracking Task,[26] Mental Arithmetic Test,[27] Digit Symbol Substitution Test,[28] and MMSE.[21] The secondary outcomes included depression, evaluated by the BDI and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression.[29] Safety was evaluated based on the heart rate, systolic blood pressure (BP), diastolic BP, and body weight measurements.

2.7. Statistical analysis

The required sample size for this study was estimated to be 15 patients in each group, based on the standard difference, with a statistical power of 80% and a significance level of 0.05. Assuming 20% dropout rate, at least 36 patients (with 18 in each group) were required to be recruited for this study. All outcome data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat approach. In addition, Chi-square tests and t tests were used to analyze the categorical and continuous data, respectively, with relative risks and 95% confidence intervals.

3. Results

Sixty-four patients with TBI were initially assessed for the selection (Fig. 1). Of them, 28 subjects were excluded, including 21 patients who failed to meet the inclusion criteria, and 7 patients who rejected to participate in the current study. After this, 36 patients were included and randomly assigned to the intervention group or placebo group, with 18 patients each group. At the end of treatment, 3 subjects withdrew from the study. Thus, 33 patients completed the treatment (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flowchart of patients selection.

The basic characteristics of the included patients in both groups are presented in Table 1. Both groups did not show significant differences in terms of age, sex, race, education background, duration since their head injury, levels of fatigue, cognitive functions, and depression as investigated at baseline (Table 1).

Table 1.

Patients characteristics at baseline.

3.

At the end of the 30-week treatment, Mental Fatigue Scale score, to evaluate mental fatigue, was 12.1 (±4.9) in the intervention group, which was significantly lower than that in the placebo group (17.9 (±7.3); P  =  .005, Table 2). The results of cognitive functions, measured using Choice Reaction Time, Compensatory Tracking Task, Mental Arithmetic Test, Digit Symbol Substitution Test, and MMSE scores, showed significant differences between 2 groups at the end of 30 weeks (P < .05, Table 2). In addition, the depression scores of BDI and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression were 14.9 (±8.1) and 15.1 (±6.0) respectively in the intervention group, compared to 20.1 (±7.3) (P  =  .04, Table 2) and 20.3 (±5.1) (P  =  .005, Table 2) respectively in the placebo group.

Table 2.

Primary and secondary outcome measurements after 30 weeks treatment.

3.

No significant differences in the heart rate, systolic BP, diastolic BP, and body weight were found between the 2 groups regarding safety at the end of 30-week treatment (P > .05, Table 3).

Table 3.

Safety between 2 groups after 30 weeks treatment.

3.

4. Discussion

A previous study evaluated the effects of methylphenidate on mental fatigue, cognitive function, and safety for treating patients with TBI. It found that methylphenidate reduces mental fatigue and improves cognitive functions with long-term methylphenidate treatment.[30] Although this study did not involve any type of control intervention,[30] its finding is consistent with the present study in showing that methylphenidate can reduce mental fatigue and improve cognitive outcomes in patients with TBI. Another reported study with a small sample size investigated the effects of methylphenidate and sertraline compared with placebo on various neuropsychiatric sequelae associated with TBI.[31] It found that methylphenidate and sertraline had similar effects on depressive symptoms.[31] However, methylphenidate seemed to be more beneficial in improving cognitive function and maintaining daytime alertness.[31] In addition, methylphenidate also offered better tolerability than sertraline. Two literature reviews also assessed the effect and safety of methylphenidate for treating subjects with TBI.[32,33] Of those, one demonstrated that methylphenidate is likely to improve memory, attention, concentration, and mental processing; however, its effects on behavior have not been determined.[32] The other one reported the positive effects of methylphenidate for enhancing vigilance-associated attention.[33] However, no significant positive impact was noted on the facilitation of memory or processing speed.

In the present study, patients with TBI in the intervention group showed a significant decrease in fatigue and an improvement in cognitive outcome, compared to patients in the placebo group. This suggests that methylphenidate had a positive effect on mental fatigue and cognitive functional outcomes. In addition, this study also demonstrated that methylphenidate could improve depression in patients with TBI.

This study has several limitations. First, although this study was a randomized placebo-controlled trial, its sample size was quite small, which may affect the results. Second, differences in the severity of the clinical symptoms between the 2 groups may have affected the outcomes, such as cognitive functions, though no differences were found at baseline. Third, other factors, such as the area of brain injury, cognitive difficulties, and psychiatric history, that were not investigated might also affect the outcome measurements.

This study showed that methylphenidate treatment in patients with TBI improved not only fatigue and cognitive functions but also depression. Further randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are still needed to verify these results.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: BDI = Beck Depression Inventory, BP = blood pressure, MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination, TBI = traumatic brain injury.

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  • [1].Bruns J, Jr, Hauser WA. The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury: a review. Epilepsia 2003;44Suppl:2–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Castriotta RJ, Lai JM. Sleep disorders associated with traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:1403–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].King NS, Crawford S, Wenden FJ, et al. The Rivermead post concussion symptoms questionnaire: a measure of symptoms commonly experienced after head injury and its reliability. J Neurol 1995;24:587–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].King NS. Emotional, neuropsychological, and organic factors: their use in the prediction of persisting postconcussion symptoms after moderate and mild head injuries. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1996;61:75–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Johansson B, Rönnbäck L. Agrawal A. Mental fatigue; a common long term consequence after a brain injury. Brain Injury – Functional Aspects, Rehabilitation and Prevention. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech; 2012. 3–16. [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Millis SR, Rosenthal M, Novack TA, et al. Long-term neuropsychological outcome after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2001;16:343–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Seel RT, Kreutzer JS, Rosenthal M, et al. Depression after traumatic brain injury: a National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Model Systems multicenter investigation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:177–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Wang Y, Li JP, Song YL, et al. Intensive insulin therapy for preventing postoperative infection in patients with traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e6458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Garcia-Baran D, Johnson TM, Wagner J, et al. Therapeutic approach of a high functioning individual with traumatic brain injury and subsequent emotional volatility with features of pathological laughter and crying with dextromethorphan/quinidine. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e2886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Jang SH, Kwon HG. Injury of the ascending reticular activating system in patients with fatigue and hypersomnia following mild traumatic brain injury: two case reports. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e2628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Sashika H, Takada K, Kikuchi N. Rehabilitation needs and participation restriction in patients with cognitive disorder in the chronic phase of traumatic brain injury. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e5968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Jang SH, Yi JH, Kwon HG. Injury of the dorsolateral prefronto-thalamic tract in a patient with depression following mild traumatic brain injury: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e5009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Warden DL, Gordon B, Mcallister TW, et al. Guidelines for the pharmacologic treatment of neurobehavioral sequelae of traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2006;23:1468–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Weber P, Lutschg J. Methylphenidate treatment. Pediatr Neurol 2002;26:261–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Sivan M, Neumann V, Kent R, et al. Pharmacotherapy for treatment of attention deficits after non-progressive acquired brain injury. A systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2010;24:110–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Whyte J, Vaccaro M, Grieb-Neff P, et al. Psychostimulant use in the rehabilitation of individuals with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2002;17:284–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Shire US Inc WPA. Product Information: Daytrana(TM) transdermal patches, methylphenidate transdermal system transdermal patches. 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • [18].American Psychiatric Association. Diagnositc and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edn. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press Inc; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • [19].McAllister TW. Silver JM, Yudofsky SC, Hales RE. Mild traumatic brain injury and the postconcussive syndrome. Neuropsychiatry of Traumatic Brain Injury. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press Inc; 1994. 357–92. [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, et al. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961;5:561–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Leonard BE, McCartan D, White J, et al. Methylphenidate: a review of its neuropharmacological, neuropsychological and adverse clinical effects. Hum Psychopharmacol 2004;19:151–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Johansson B, Starmark A, Berglund P, et al. A self-assessment questionnaire for mental fatigue and related symptoms after neurological disorders and injuries. Brain Inj 2010;24:2–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Johansson B, Ronnback L. Evaluation of the mental fatigue scale and its relation to cognitive and emotional functioning after traumatic brain injury or stroke. Int J Phys Med Rehabil 2014;2:182. [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Hindmarch I, Parrott AC. Repeated dose comparisons of nomifensine, imipramine and placebo on subjective assessments of sleep and objective measures of psychomotor performance. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1977;4:167–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Hindmarch I, Subhan Z, Stoker MJ. The effects of zimelidine and amitriptyline on car driving and psychomotor performance. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983;68:141–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Hindmarch I. Psychomotor function and psychoactive drugs. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1980;10:189–209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation; 1981. [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1960;23:56–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Johansson B, Wentzel AP, Andréll P, et al. Long-term treatment with methylphenidate for fatigue after traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurol Scand 2017;135:100–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Lee H, Kim SW, Kim JM, et al. Comparing effects of methylphenidate, sertraline and placebo on neuropsychiatric sequelae in patients with traumatic brain injury. Hum Psychopharmacol 2005;20:97–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Siddall OM. Use of methylphenidate in traumatic brain injury. Ann Pharmacother 2005;39:1309–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Huang CH, Huang CC, Sun CK, et al. Methylphenidate on cognitive improvement in patients with traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis. Curr Neuropharmacol 2016;14:272–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES