Abstract
Glyconanotechnology offers a broad range of applications across basic and translation research. Despite the tremendous progress in glyco-nanomaterials, there is still a huge gap between the basic research and therapeutic applications of these molecules. It has been reported that complexity and the synthetic challenges in glycans synthesis, the cost of the high order in vivo models and large amount of sample consumptions limited the effort to translate the glyco-nanomaterials into clinical applications. In this regards, several promising simple animal models for preliminary, quick analysis of the nanomaterials activities has been proposed. Herein, we have studied a systematic evaluation of the toxicity, biodistribution of fluorescently tagged PEG and mannose-capped gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) of three different shapes (sphere, rod, and star) in the adult zebrafish model, which could accelerate and provide preliminary results for further experiments in the higher order animal system. ICP-MS analysis and confocal images of various zebrafish organs revealed that rod-AuNPs exhibited the fast uptake. While, star-AuNPs displayed prolong sequestration, demonstrating its potential therapeutic efficacy in drug delivery.
Introduction
Carbohydrate on the cell surfaces has been recognized as the first line of contact for pathogens, toxins and cells1. Nature has utilized multivalent binding between carbohydrate and proteins to increase the avidity of cell signaling, molecular recognition and inflammations. Hence, mimicking multivalent interactions using synthetic nanoparticles can lead to potential therapeutic models to treat inflammations, imaging, bacterial infections, and cancer2–5. Till date, the mouse model has been extensively used as in vivo in all these glyconanotechnology research6–12. However, owing to a significant amount of sample consumption, and complex biological system, there is a need for an alternative information rich, simple in vivo system to reduce quantity of materials consumption and at the same time acquiring useful biological information at inexpensive, before planning the experiment with the complex models. Animals including fish, insects and worms are considered to be the simple model for pre-clinical research and each of these in vivo tools has their own merits and demerits. For example, Caenorhabditis elegans is widely used to investigate the chemical toxicity due to its sensitivity to oxidative stress13. Moreover, they have a short lifespan, transparency, ease of cultivation, and high-level conservation of the vertebrate genome. However, the lack of specific organs (eyes and ears) and specific tissues (bones) limits its applications for further pharmacokinetics studies. Similarly, the invertebrate Drosophila melanogaster and Hydra have also received similar attention14–16. Drosophila offers various organs similar to human systems including the digestive system, blood vessels and kidney, and high genetic homology with the human genome. However, fruit flies have lack of vital organs such as kidney, liver and spleen. In contrast, zebrafish has been used as a model in developmental biology and wide range of human diseases, including cancer, cardiovascular disorders, neurological diseases, liver diseases and immunological studies17–20. Zebrafish is considered to be one of the simple animal models with widely accepted ethical principles and cost of each experiment is expected to be less than a dollar. Currently, zebrafish model was used to study the human diseases, including cancer, cardiovascular disorder, neurological diseases, liver diseases and immunological studies21–23. In addition to study the human disease, zebrafish model was also used in nanotechnology research. Li and his coworkers have used zebrafish model to evaluate the neural behavior of silica nanoparticles. Similarly, Zhu et al. used fish model to demonstrate the toxicity of gold nanoparticles decorated with positive, negative and neutral charged ligands. Recently, Kovriznych et al. have shown that zebrafish model can be used for optimize the toxicity of the different types of nanoparticles24–27. However, the shape dependent gold nanoparticles toxicity, biodistribution and sequestration has not studied well so far in zebrafish model. Herein, we report the potential application of adult zebrafish in glyco-nanomaterial research. As a prototype, we report how different shapes of PEG and mannose capped goldnanoparticles (AuNPs) influence the toxicity, uptake and clearance in the zebrafish model. Previously, it has been shown that shape of the glyco-gold nanoparticles significantly influences carbohydrate-mediated bacterial adhesion and endocytosis in mammalian cells28. Hence, deciphering the role of different shapes of gold-nanoparticles in in vivo system undoubtedly results in designing better glycoprobes to target or inhibit the carbohydrate-protein interactions (CPI).
Results and Discussion
Synthesis and characterization of Fluorescein - conjugated glyco-gold nanoparticles
To assess the interplay between the shape and carbohydrate-mediated interactions in the zebrafish model, AuNPs were synthesized by using PEG or mannose and fluorescein linker. The required mannose-linker was synthesized as described in the literature28. The fluorescent-linker (8) was synthesized from (3), which was obtained by treating with thioacetic acid and azo-isobutyronitrile (AIBN), followed by one-pot de-acetylation and de-esterification to yield compound 5. Coupling between tert-butyl (2-aminoethyl) carbamate and 5-Carboxyfluorescein resulted in compound 7, which was further deprotected and in situ coupling of 5 gave the final fluorescein linker 8. Fluorescent conjugated AuNPs were synthesized by mixing linker (8) with mannose coated AuNPs (Fig. 1). Unreacted ligands were separated by centrifugation. Similarly, pegylated hybrid AuNPs were also synthesized. The hybrid glyco-AuNPs were characterized by using UV-visible, fluorescence, (Fig. S1) zeta potential, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) techniques. UV-visible spectra of glyco goldnanoparticles (G-AuNPs) dispalyed characteristic localised surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) peaks at 830 nm for rod-AuNPs 525 nm, for spherical-AuNPs and 723 nm, for star-AuNPs respectively. Absorbtion peak between 400–500 and emission at 524 nm, provides the evidence for conjugation of fluorescein on AuNPs. The sugar and fluorescein conjugation on AuNPs was quantified by phenol-sulfuric acid assay and UV-visible spectroscopy (Tables S1, S2 and S3).
The zeta potentials of nanoparticles were measured in both Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and water. The changes in zeta potentials confirmed displacement of primary surfactants by sugar and fluorescein linkers. In DMEM media, the soft layer of fetal bovine serum proteins interacts with carbohydrates moieties29 and alters the zeta-potential on the AnNPs further (Table 1). SEM images of mannose-AuNPs displayed almost identical size similar to native AuNPs (Fig. 2).
Table 1.
Particle | Diameter(s) (nm) | λmax (nm) | ζ-potentials (mV) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Water | DMEM | |||
Rod | 47.6 ± 3.0 × 12.3 ± 1.5 | 820 | 30.9 ± 1.3 | 5.42 ± 0.6 |
Sphere | 16.5 ± 2.0 | 524 | −22 ± 1.2 | −16.8 ± 0.3 |
Star | 42.3 ± 2.5 × 16.1 ± 1.0 | 714 | −27.5 ± 1.0 | −6.9 ± 0.5 |
R-2 | 48.8 ± 3.5 × 12.6 ± 1.5 | 830 | −9.5 ± 1.5 | −6.1 ± 0.7 |
R-1 | 46.9 ± 3.0 × 12.0 ± 1.5 | 825 | −28.9 ± 1.0 | −2.9 ± 0.9 |
S-2 | 19.5 ± 1.5 | 525 | −20.1 ± 1.5 | −4.9 ± 0.2 |
S-1 | 19.0 ± 2.0 | 524 | −13.7 ± 1.2 | −2.1 ± 0.5 |
St-2 | 45.5 ± 1.2 × 16.5 ± 2.0 | 723 | −21.1 ± 1.8 | −3.1 ± 0.9 |
St-1 | 44.0 ± 1.0 × 16.5 ± 1.0 | 723 | −17.1 ± 1.2 | −5.2 ± 0.8 |
Acute toxicity
The nanomaterial toxicity was extensively explored in the zebrafish model by exposing fishes in the nanoparticles containing tank (classical method). Although zebrafish of all life stages are utilized for toxicological studies, we chose to use adult zebrafish for this study due to their ability to absorb particles effectively. Furthermore, the nanoparticles were administration into the zebrafish via intraperitoneal injection instead of classical method to reduce the amount of sample consumption and toxicity can be observed with minimum number of fishes30. To this end, AuNPs were intraperitoneal injected to the adult zebrafish and followed their mortality. It has been observed that none of the G-AuNps showed toxicity upto 120 h, indicating that G-AuNPs are biocomatible for in vivo studies (Fig. S2).
Biodistribution and sequestration studies of G-AuNPs in Zebrafish model
Since the AuNPs were non-toxic, it is worth to study their biodistribution and sequestration to target the specific organ using different shapes31–33 and carbohydrate receptors. To this end, PEGylated and mannose-AuNPs (5 µg/g) of different shapes were intraperitoneally injected into zebrafish (Fig. S3). After 4 h, 24 h and 48 h exposure, fishes were sacrificed and different organs (brain, eye, heart, muscles, swim bladder and digestive system) were dissected. We examined the biodistribution of AuNPs into the various organs by quantifying the gold concentration using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Figure 3 shows the organ-specific AuNPs sequestration at different time intervals. Our results demonstrated remarkable sensitivity of the zebrafish towards mannose-AuNPs compared to PEG-AuNPs. Mannose-AuNPs were sequestered in the digestive system, swim bladder and heart, but not in the brain, muscles and the eyes (Fig. S4). However, the intrinsic shape of the AuNPs generated unexpected interrelationship on the number of AuNPs uptake and clearance. As illustrated in Fig. 2(a), the digestive system exhibited maximum mannose AuNPs sequestration after 4 h. However, after 24 h and 48 h a drastic difference in the shape dependent accumulation of nanoparticles was observed. Elongated particles (R-2) accumulated in higher number in the initial state and got cleared after 48 h, whereas, the St-2 was accumulated in steady state and sequestered for extended periods of time as compared to S-2. PEGylated-AuNPs had the least sequestration, demonstrating the inter-relationship between shapes and carbohydrate-mediated interactions (Fig. 3). The sequestration of mannose-AuNPs further support the presence of sugar receptors, either in the form of dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-3-grabbing non integrin (DC-SIGN) or other C-type lectins. Similar trends were observed in heart, indicating the broad distribution of mannose receptors in the zebrafish model. In the swim bladder, accumulation was higher for mannose nano-rod (R-2) after 4 h34, 35. However, after 24 h and 48 h, clearance of R-2 and slow sequestration of star- nanoparticles further confirm the therapeutical value of star-AuNPs.
The observed differences in the rate of biodistribution and sequestration of different shapes of AuNPs could be attributed to several physical factors associated with the nanoparticles and the chemical compositions as well. The physical factors such as aspect ratio of rod shape nanoparticles induced fast uptake and clearance from the system compared to spherical counter parts. While friction coefficient of nanoparticles (NPs), which is high in the star-shape AuNPs36 and tumbling motion of NPs underflow invivo system is expected to be influence the sequestration of the star AuNPs. In addition, mannose based interactions could also influence the uptake mechanism. However, these interactions is more precise with higher glycans conjugated AuNPs. Finally, clearance of AuNPs was quantified by gold concentration in the water tank. As illustrated in Fig. S5, the PEG-AuNPs clearance from the zebrafish system much faster than the mannose-AuNPs counterparts. Further, star-AuNPs slow clearance further illustrates the significance of shapes in the in vivo studies.
The digestive system accumulation was qualitatively analyzed by confocal imaging of the tissue sections37. Figure 4 explicitly describes the relative fluorescent intensity of fluorescein conjugated G-AuNPs after 4 h. As expected, PEGylated nanoparticles were least sequestered in the digestive systems. While, mannose-AuNPs seem to taken up substantial by the digestive system. The time dependent, confocal imaging of St-2 clearly showed that St-mannose-AuNPs sequestered in the digestive system for a long period (Fig. 4) compared to R-2. overall, the shape and mannose conjugation on the nanoparticles showed marked differences in the biodistribution and sequestration.
Conclusion
Here, we describe successfully constructed bifunctional fluorescent glyco-gold-nanoparticles to probe its in vivo efficiency using zebrafish model. The intraperitonial injection of these nanoparticles into the adult zebrafish resulted very low toxicity, indicating the potential use of these nanoparticles for drug delivery and imaging studies. Using ICP-MS analysis and confocal imaging, we have demonstrated that the rate of bio-distribution of the AuNPs varies with its shape and mannose conjugation. Rod-AuNPs showed faster uptake and clearance. In contrast, star-AuNPs showed slow and long sequestration compared to other two shapes. Moreover, AuNPs showed remarkable sensitivity towards mannose compared to PEG linker.
Methods
Synthesis of glyco-gold nanoparticles
Gold nanoparticles of different shapes were synthesized by applying literature procedures38–40. 0.5 ml of 1 mM thiol PEG linker (1) /thiol mannose linker (2) and purified by centrifugation, followed by mixed with 0.1 mM of 8 with 0.5 ml of the AuNPs solution. After incubation at room temperature for 12 h, the modified Au nanostructures were separated by centrifugation and re-dispersed in deionized water.
Zeta potential studies
We used a zeta potential analyzer to measure the surface potential of AuNPs. In the measurement, we applied unit field strength (1 Volt per meter) to the AuNP solution. We measured zeta potential of different shapes of AuNPs in water. In the case of DMEM medium, we incubated all AuNps in DMEM medium (containing 10% FBS) for 24 h and purified by centrifugation and measured zeta potential.
Phenol-sulfuric acid method to quantify sugars on AuNPs
The concentration of mannose sugars on AuNPs were determined by the phenol-sulfuric acid method. 50 μL sugar functionalized-AuNPs were added to concentrated sulfuric acid (130 μL, 100%) and aqueous phenol solution (5% w/v, 30 μL) in the test tube and heated to 90 °C. After 5 min, the solution was cooled to room temperature and the absorbance coefficient at 490 nm was measured. AuNPs as such in sulfuric acid was used as a control. The sugar concentration was estimated by comparing the absorption of the sample with a standard curve. The compound 8 concentration was measured by using absorption coefficient of 4-carboxy fluorescein.
Zebrafish model
Local wild-type zebrafish strain weighing approximately 500–600 mg (2–3 months old) were maintained under standard laboratory conditions at 28 °C under 14:10 h light/dark cycle conductivity of 350 μS of the water maintained at pH 7.2–7.4. The surgical procedures were performed in accordance with Institutional Animal Ethical Committee regulation, set up by CPCSEA, Govt. of India.
Acute toxicity determination
Zebrafishes were anesthetized with 2-phenoxyethanol and -AuNPs were injected. The number of zebrafish in each experimental and control group was 6 in each group.
Sample preparation for ICP-MS analysis
Zebrafish were anesthetized with 2-phenoxyethanol and injected 2 µl contain 5 µg/g nanoparticles of rod, sphere and star shape AuNPs via intraperitoneally using catheter implantation tubing attached to a cut 22-G needle tip at one end and another end attached to Hamilton syringe. After 4 h, 24 h and 48 h injection, fishes were sacrificed and organs were collected. Organs were homogenized with 400 μl of aqua regia at 95 °C for 4 h. All digested samples were centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 10 min to remove debris. Then each digested samples were diluted to 6 ml with Millipore water. The concentration of Au, determined by ICP-MS (Thermo-Fisher Scientific, Germany), was converted into the number of AuNPs per one mg per gram of the organ.
Confocal imaging studies
Zebrafish were anesthetized with 2-phenoxyethanol and injected with 2 µl contain 5 µg/g nanoparticles of FITC conjugated G-AuNPs via intraperitoneal injection. After 4 h, 24 h and 48 h of injection, fishes were sacrificed and digestive system was collected. Organ was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and 4% glutaraldehyde followed by dehydration with the gradient increase of ethanol (75%, 95%, 100%) for 30 min each, further with xylene for 1 h and then fixed in paraplast. Blocks were stored in −10 °C for 12 h before proceeding to section. 10 µm thicknesses of sections were cut by using Leica microtome instrument and sections were collected on PLL-coated glass plates. The sections were washed with xylene to remove excess of paraplast. After drying, sections were fixed with mounting media. Sequestration of AuNPs in digestive system was analyzed by confocal fluorescence microscopy using CLSM (Zeiss LSM 710) microscope. The excitation wavelength was 450 nm, detection wavelength was 510 nm and 25 X objective was used to image digestive system sections.
Statistical analysis
Statistical comparisons were done using the Student t test or one-way ANOVA. The p < 0.05 is considered to be statistical significance.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
Financial support from the IISER, Pune, Max-planck partner group and DST (Grant No. SB/S1/C-46/2014) is gratefully acknowledged. P. M. C. acknowledgment CSIR-RA, S. S. and B. S. thanks CSIR-JRF for supporting their fellowships. Special thanks to Prof. N. K. Subedhar and Dr. Aurnab Ghosh for helping to setup zebrafish experiments.
Author Contributions
R. K. conceived and directed the project. S. S., B. S. designed and synthesized the fluorescein linker, S. S., R. V. M., S. T. and P. M. C. performed the zebrafish experiments.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41598-017-03350-3
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Varki, A. et al. Essentials of Glycobiology, (second ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, 2009). [PubMed]
- 2.Cohen M, Varki A. Modulation of glycan recognition by clustered saccharide patches. Int. Rev. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2014;308:75–125. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800097-7.00003-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bertozzi CR, Kiessling LL. Chemical glycobiology. Science. 2001;291:2357–2364. doi: 10.1126/science.1059820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Safari D, et al. Gold nanoparticles as carriers for a synthetic Streptococcus pneumoniae type 14 conjugate vaccine. Nanomedicine. 2012;7:651–662. doi: 10.2217/nnm.11.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Delbianco M, Bharate P, Varela-Aramburu S, Seeberger PH. Carbohydrates in Supramolecular Chemistry. Chem. Rev. 2016;116:1693–1752. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.van Kasteren SI, et al. Glyconanoparticles allow pre-symptomatic in vivo imaging of brain disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:18–23. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806787106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Padmanabhan, P., Kumar, A., Kumar, S., Chaudhary, R. K. & Gulyas, B. Nanoparticles in practice for molecular-imaging applications: An overview. Acta. Biomater. 41 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 8.Lai CH, et al. Analysis of Carbohydrate-Carbohydrate Interactions Using Sugar-Functionalized Silicon Nanoparticles for Cell Imaging. Nano. Lett. 2016;16:807–811. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kennedy DC, et al. Carbohydrate functionalization of silver nanoparticles modulates cytotoxicity and cellular uptake. J. nanobiotechnology. 2014;12:59. doi: 10.1186/s12951-014-0059-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kikkeri R, Lepenies B, Adibekian A, Laurino P, Seeberger PH. In vitro imaging and in vivo liver targeting with carbohydrate capped quantum dots. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:2110–2112. doi: 10.1021/ja807711w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Barandov A, et al. A new bifunctional chelator enables facile biocoupling and radiolabeling as the basis for a bioconjugation kit. ChemBioChem. 2014;15:986–994. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201400001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ohyanagi T, et al. Importance of sialic acid residues illuminated by live animal imaging using phosphorylcholine self-assembled monolayer-coated quantum dots. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:12507–12517. doi: 10.1021/ja111201c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gonzalez-Moragas L, Roig A, Laromaine A. C. elegans as a tool for in vivo nanoparticle assessment. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015;219:10–26. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2015.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Marchesano V, et al. Impact of Carbon Nano-Onions on Hydra vulgaris as a Model Organism for Nanoecotoxicology. Nanomaterials. 2015;5:1331–1350. doi: 10.3390/nano5031331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang B, et al. Akt signaling-associated metabolic effects of dietary gold nanoparticles in Drosophila. Sci. Rep. 2012;2:563. doi: 10.1038/srep00563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jiang S, et al. Oral Administration and Selective Uptake of Polymeric Nanoparticles in Drosophila Larvae as an in Vivo Model. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2015;1:1077–1084. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b00163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.MacRae CA, Peterson RT. Zebrafish as tools for drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2015;14:721–731. doi: 10.1038/nrd4627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lu JW, et al. Zebrafish as a disease model for studying human hepatocellular carcinoma. World j. gastroenterology. 2015;21:12042–12058. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i42.12042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.George S, et al. Use of a high-throughput screening approach coupled with in vivo zebrafish embryo screening to develop hazard ranking for engineered nanomaterials. ACS nano. 2011;5:1805–1817. doi: 10.1021/nn102734s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Newman M, Ebrahimie E, Lardelli M. Using the zebrafish model for Alzheimer’s disease research. Front. Genet. 2014;5:189. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wu Q, et al. Enhanced antitumor activity and mechanism of biodegradable polymeric micelles-encapsulated chetomin in both transgenic zebrafish and mouse models. Nanoscale. 2014;6:11940–11952. doi: 10.1039/C4NR02978J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Li, J., Ha, H. H., Guo, L., Coomber, D. & Chang, Y. T. Discovery of novel zebrafish neural tracers by organism-based screening of a rosamine library. Chem. Commun. 46, 2932–2934 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 23.Son SW, et al. Intravital imaging in zebrafish using quantum dots. Skin Res. Technol. 2009;15:157–160. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2008.00341.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.da Rocha AM, et al. Gene expression and biochemical responses in brain of zebrafish Danio rerio exposed to organic nanomaterials: carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) and fullerenol (C60(OH)18-22(OK4)) Comp. biochem. physiol. Part A, Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2013;165:460–467. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2013.03.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Li X, et al. SiO2 nanoparticles change colour preference and cause Parkinson’s-like behaviour in zebrafish. Sci. Rep. 2014;4:3810. doi: 10.1038/srep03810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhu ZJ, et al. Surface properties dictate uptake, distribution, excretion, and toxicity of nanoparticles in fish. Small. 2010;6:2261–2265. doi: 10.1002/smll.201000989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kovriznych JA, et al. Acute toxicity of 31 different nanoparticles to zebrafish (Danio rerio) tested in adulthood and in early life stages - comparative study. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 2013;6:67–73. doi: 10.2478/intox-2013-0012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chaudhary PM, et al. Assessing the effect of different shapes of glyco-gold nanoparticles on bacterial adhesion and infections. Chem. Commun. 2015;51:15669–15672. doi: 10.1039/C5CC05238F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chithrani BD, Ghazani AA, Chan WC. Determining the size and shape dependence of gold nanoparticle uptake into mammalian cells. Nano Lett. 2006;6:662–668. doi: 10.1021/nl052396o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bar-Ilan O, Albrecht RM, Fako VE, Furgeson DY. Toxicity assessments of multisized gold and silver nanoparticles in zebrafish embryos. Small. 2009;5:1897–1910. doi: 10.1002/smll.200801716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Weber GE, et al. Biodistribution and toxicological study of PEGylated single-wall carbon nanotubes in the zebrafish (Danio rerio) nervous system. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2014;280:484–492. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2014.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wang Y, Seebald JL, Szeto DP, Irudayaraj J. Biocompatibility and biodistribution of surface-enhanced Raman scattering nanoprobes in zebrafish embryos: in vivo and multiples imaging. ACS Nano. 2010;4:4039–4053. doi: 10.1021/nn100351h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zhang J, et al. Quantitative biokinetics and systemic translocation of various gold nanostructures are highly dependent on their size and shape. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2014;14:4124–4138. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2014.8274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zheng W, et al. Comparative transcriptome analyses indicate molecular homology of zebrafish swimbladder and mammalian lung. PloS one. 2011;6:e24019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zheng F, et al. Molecular Cloning and Functional Characterization of Mannose Receptor in Zebra Fish (Danio rerio) during Infection with Aeromonas sobria. Int. j. mol. Sci. 2015;16:10997–11012. doi: 10.3390/ijms160510997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Black KC, et al. Radioactive 198Au-doped nanostructures with different shapes for in vivo analyses of their biodistribution, tumor uptake, and intratumoral distribution. ACS nano. 2014;8:4385–4394. doi: 10.1021/nn406258m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Skjolding, L. M. et al. An assessment of the importance of exposure routes to the uptake and internal localisation of fluorescent nanoparticles in zebrafish (Danio rerio), using light sheet microscopy. Nanotoxicology 1–9 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 38.Nikoobakht B, El-Sayed MA. Preparation and growth mechanism of gold nanorods (NRs) using seed-mediated growth method. Chem. Mater. 2003;15:1957–1962. doi: 10.1021/cm020732l. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Xie JP, Lee JY, Wang DIC. Seedless, surfactantless, high-yield synthesis of branched gold nanocrystals in HEPES buffer solution. Chem. Mater. 2007;19:2823–2830. doi: 10.1021/cm0700100. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cho EC, Liu Y, Xia Y. A simple spectroscopic method for differentiating cellular uptakes of gold nanospheres and nanorods from their mixtures. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2010;49:1976–1980. doi: 10.1002/anie.200906584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.