Abstract
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is defined as an idiopathic inflammatory disorder primarily involving the mucosa and submucosa of the colon. UC-associated colon cancers (also known as colitic cancers) develop through the inflammation–dysplasia sequence, which is a major problem affecting the prognosis of patients with UC. It is therefore very important to detect malignancy from UC at an early stage. As precancerous lesions arising in UC, there are pathological adenomatous changes, basal cell changes, in situ anaplasia, clear cell changes, and pan-cellular change. It is considered that the mutation of the p53 gene plays a crucial role, and the protein expression of p53 in dysplastic crypts may serve as a good biomarker in the early stages of UC-associated colon carcinogenesis. Immunohistochemistry for p53 is a very valuable diagnostic tool in UC-associated colon cancers. However, protein expression of p53 is not always universal, and additional methods may be required to assess p53 status in UC-associated colon cancers.
Keywords: ulcerative colitis, p53, dysplasia, colitic cancer
1. Introduction
The WHO Council for International Organization of Medical Sciences defines ulcerative colitis (UC) as an idiopathic inflammatory disorder primarily involving the mucosa and submucosa of the colon, especially the rectum. Its etiology remains unknown, although immunopathological mechanisms and predisposing psychological factors are believed to be involved. It usually results in bloody diarrhea and various degrees of systemic involvement, as well as an increased propensity for malignant degeneration; furthermore, if prolonged, it affects the entire colon. The treatment of UC is dependent on the severity (i.e., mild, moderate, or severe) from clinical findings [1]. The treatment for mild-to-moderate UC is the administration of salazosulufapyridine and other 5-aminosalicylic acid (ASA) formulations. These drugs are useful for the induction of a remission state and the maintenance of UC. For patients with moderate-to-severe UC, oral or intravenous corticosteroids are useful, and if active UC does not respond to 5-ASA treatment, prednisolone is usually started. Half of all patients with colon-type chronic UC undergo surgery within 10 years after onset.
It is known that UC-associated colon cancers (also known as colitic cancers) develop through the inflammation–dysplasia sequence, which is a major problem of UC threatening the patient’s prognosis. The incidence of UC-associated colon cancers was 1.6–3.7%, and that of all colon types was 5.4% [2,3,4]. The development of UC-associated colon cancers has been shown to take on multiple stages of carcinogenesis, and the process is different from the sporadic adenoma carcinoma sequence [5,6,7,8,9].
The mutation of the p53 gene is a critical genetic change, involved in the early stages of UC-associated carcinogenesis of the colorectum. Overexpression of p53 protein in crypts of the colorectum is usually observed in patients with UC when no dysplasia is histopathologically observed, and is used by pathologists to define a state between regenerative changes and intraepithelial neoplasia. It is also used as a biomarker in predicting the risk of evolution toward malignancy. A high frequency of p53 mutations has been reported to be found in patients with chronic UC with severe disease who were not diagnosed with cancer [10,11,12,13].
Herein, we review the histopathological diagnostic criteria and the importance of p53 expression, which may be a diagnostic biomarker of malignant transformation in UC associated-colon carcinogenesis.
2. Histopathological Diagnosis of UC
Based on clinical symptoms and endoscopic findings, the staging of UC is classified into an active phase and a remission phase. There are some histopathological activity classifications, such as Matts classification [14], the Floren classification [15], the Sandborn classification [16], and the Geboes classification [17], which are based on the inflammatory cell infiltration.
2.1. Inflammation
Pathological findings in classical untreated UC show the histological pattern of chronic active colitis reflecting active inflammation with the characteristics of chronic mucosal injury. Activity is defined by neutrophil-mediated epithelial injury, with neutrophils infiltrating crypt epithelium (cryptitis), and collections of neutrophils within crypt lumens (crypt abscesses), or by infiltration of surface epithelium with or without mucosal ulceration (Figure 1). The inflammation and mucosal ulceration often cause pseudopolyposis to develop. Chronic changes include architectural distortion, basal lymphoplasmacytosis, and paneth cell metaplasia [18,19]. The architectural distortion includes both shortening and branching of crypts. Basal lymphoplasmacytosis refers to the presence of lymphoplasmacytic infiltration between crypt base and muscle mucosa. Paneth cells are a normal component of the right colon, but their presence in the left colon is a metaplastic change that occurs due to chronic crypt epithelial damage [18,19]. Microscopically, these changes in chronic active colitis are widely homogeneous when symptoms are observed [20].
2.2. Dysplasia
The classification of the Dysplasia Morphology Study Group is widely known as a diagnostic criterion of dysplasia developed in UC (Table 1) [21]. Riddell et al. [22] categorize dysplasia morphologically as adenomatous change, basal cell change, in situ anaplasia, clear cell change, and pan-cellular change. Among these, adenomatous change and basal cell change are most commonly observed [23].
Table 1.
(1) Negative for dyplasia |
・Normal mucosa, Inactive colitis, Active colitis |
(2) Indefinite for dysplasia |
・Probably negative |
(3) Positive for dysplasia |
・Low-grade dysplasia |
・High-grade dysplasia |
Adenomatous change shows some macroscopic appearances, such as a flat and a protruding lesion. It often shows a villous feature and heterozygosity in the bottom of the gland. It tends to differentiate toward the surface layer. There are many unremarkable lesions, sometimes characterized by budding on the surface side and the demonstration of club-shaped villi. Basal cell change is a tissue type common in flat lesions, where relatively small chromatin-rich nuclei are located side by side; this is known as a Beluga caviar-like appearance [22]. Recently, UC has two general patterns of dysplasia, which are commonly classified as adenoma-like dysplasia-associated lesion or mass (DALM) and non-adenoma-like DALM [20,24]. The cytoplasm is broad and eosinophilic. It is poorly differentiated, and has the characteristic that many Goblet cells are unrecognized.
2.3. UC-Associated Dysplasia–Carcinoma Sequence
The development of neoplasms in long-standing UC proceeds from nondysplastic mucosa to visible or invisible low-grade dysplasia (LGD), high-grade dysplasia (HGD), and eventually to carcinoma. These UC-associated neoplasms have macroscopically unclear boundaries, and microscopically, dysplasia lesions spread out. Dysplastic lesions invade deeply despite retaining mucosal structures and staying within the mucosal muscularis, compared with normal colon cancer, features that do not significantly affect existing structures. Moreover, there is very little desmoplastic reaction, and there are crypts that infiltrate deeply. Mucinous carcinoma and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma are considered to be common as the histology of invasive cancer merges with UC [25,26,27].
There is a critical problem with the histopathological diagnosis of UC-associated dysplasia. In the clinical setting, the management of nondysplastic UC (periodic surveillance) or UC-associated HGD (colectomy or endoscopic resection) is currently approved; however, the management of UC-associated LGD is controversial [28,29,30]. It is therefore important to select the most appropriate treatment when dysplasia of any grade is found in a patient with UC. However, it is not often easy to determine the grade of dysplasia.
UC-associated colorectal cancers result from a field change effect with multifocal genetic alterations that do not follow the typical adenoma–carcinoma sequence of events (Figure 2). In the typical adenoma–carcinoma sequence, colorectal cancers (CRCs) develop through the accumulation of mutations in several signaling pathways, including WNT, RAS, p53, DCC, and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) genes [31,32,33]. Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) mutations are rare events in the UC-associated dysplasia–carcinoma sequence (27.5% of HGD cases) compared with 50% in the typical adenoma–carcinoma sequence [5,34,35]. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) is known to be a positive regulator of UC-associated colon cancer, and it is overexpressed in a murine model of carcinoma arising on colitis [36]. Blockade of IL-6, IL-21, and CCL2 have been reported to reduce inflammation-related carcinogenesis in mice [37,38,39]. Negative regulators of UC-associated colon cancer have been reported to be IL-10 [40,41] and TGF-β [39]. Many genes, such as Bcl-xl, kRAS, COX, iNOS, APC, Smad3, STAT3, Ptgs2, Tnfrsf6, p16, Mlh1, Runx3, Dapk, and β-catenin are mutated in stages of carcinogenesis of the UC-associated cancer [42,43,44,45,46,47].
In the UC-associated dysplasia–carcinoma sequence, p53 gene mutations are early events in 50% of patients with UC compared with approximately 10% of adenomas related to the typical adenoma–carcinoma sequence [34,48]. A recent study has also reported that p53 immunostaining showed nuclear staining in the basal part of the crypts, even in the indefinite for dysplasia lesions [49]. Wild-type p53 protein in normal cells has a very short half-life [50], and there is no such amount as to be positive by immunostaining. However, abnormal p53 due to the mutation of p53 is not washed out and accumulates in the nucleus [51]. Therefore, p53—which can be identified as a immunostaining—is basically a mutant p53 protein; conversely, it can estimate gene abnormality of p53 with overexpression of p53 protein.
2.4. Genetic Alterations of p53
The p53 gene encoding the p53 protein and is considered a “genomic guardian” [52]. Loss of defined mutations and heterozygosity (LOH) is observed early in inflammatory carcinogenesis. The LOH means that only one mutation may lead to a complete loss of gene function. This is the case where one allele remains due to previous mutation or inheritance. In addition, a deficiency in patient p53 was observed without signs of dysplasia or neoplasia in more than 50% of colonic tissue specimens of ulcerative colitis, and 50–85% of colitis-associated cancers had defects in p53 gene [48]. This has been investigated by Brentnall et al. [9], who carefully mapped all resected resection specimens of patients with ulcerative colitis. They have also reported that the mutation of the p53 gene causes aneuploidy, followed by LOH. That is, p53 detected in the immunostaining is considered the mutation p53. p53 immunostaining is widely used as a surrogate for p53 mutation, however its accuracy has not been reported on colorectal cancer and UC. In ovarian cancers. Optimized p53 immunostaining can approach 100% specificity for the presence of p53 mutation, and its high negative predictive value is clinically useful, as it can exclude the possibility of a low-grade serous ovarian tumor [53]. Although p53 detected in immunostaining is considered the mutation p53, it has not been established in CRCs related to UC.
Methods detected for the detection of p53 mutations are based on genomic DNA or mRNA [54,55,56]. The most widely-used methods are based on a DNA sequencing method. However, several studies compare sequencing assays by using both mRNA and DNA targets [16,57,58,59,60,61]. In the report of whole-exome sequencing analysis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-associated CRCs [36], the mutation spectrum of p53 was predominantly located in the protein’s DNA binding domain. The spectrum of p53 single substitution in IBD-CRCs and sporadic CRCs had several noticeable differences. No mutations were observed at hot spot R273, and only one mutation was found in hot spots R248, G245, and R175 in IBD-CRCs but not sporadic CRCs. In IBD-CRCs, the predominant substitution was C:G > T:A transition at CpG dinucleotide (52.6%). This type of substitution at TP53 has previously shown a positive correlation with the expression of enzyme-induced NO synthase (iNOS) in colon tumors, and a reading of inflammation-related DNA damage has been hypothesized.
Recently, next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have played a pivotal role in the understanding of the altered genetic pathways in human malignancies. Compared with traditional sequencing methods, NGS technologies have many advantages. NGS is a high-throughput technology, as it permits massive parallel sequencing consisting of the simultaneous sequencing of multiple targeted genomic regions in multiple templates to detect coincident mutations in the same run [62]. The data of p53 mutations analyzed by the NGS will be reported on CRCs associated with UC.
3. p53 Expression as a Diagnostic Marker in UC-Associated Dysplasia
Immunostaining of p53 is useful as a tissue biomarker for predicting the risk of renewal changes, differentiation of intraepithelial neoplasms, and the evolution to malignant tumors, including colorectal cancers [49,63,64]. In UC-associated dysplasia, overexpression of p53 protein in the colonic epithelium is also found and detected in cases where the dysplasia is otherwise histologically difficult to determine (Figure 3).
In p53 immunostaining of patients with UC, Noffsinger et al. [65] have reported that there are three patterns which are regularly seen: (1) isolated immunoreactive cells in the crypts base, (2) strongly positive cells confined to the basal half of the glands, and (3) diffusely stained cells [65]. Sato et al. [66] have also reported that the basal pattern of p53 expression is limited to half of the basal cell side, and this pattern is considered pathologically equivalent to LGD or HGD in UC. Kobayashi et al. [67] have focused on the basal pattern of p53 expression and classified the expression on the basal half of the glands into three types: UC-IIa (indefinite for dysplasia, probably regenerative), UC-IIb (indefinite for dysplasia, probably dysplastic), and UC-III (low- or high-grade dysplasia). By visual estimation analyzed with computer-assisted image analysis, p53 basal positivity (more than 20% per the basal half of the crypt) was observed in 46.0% of UC-IIa crypts (128 of 278 cases), 61.9% of UC-IIb crypts (39 of 63 cases), and 94.2% of UC-III crypts (81 of 86 cases) in patients with UC. This result supports that p53 immunostaining might be a useful tool for detecting UC-associated early-stage neoplasia.
In the European Crohn’s and Colitis Organization and the European Society of Pathology, it is recommended to collect at least four or more biopsies as surveillance for every 10 cm of macroscopically abnormal areas [68]. This suggests that we should reduce the chance that too few cells are biopsied, meaning that the level of p53 basal positivity is unable to be calculated. Furthermore, UC-associated cancers usually have a genetic heterogeneity of tumor cells, even in a single tumor mass [46]. Yin J et al. [46] have reported that p53 point mutations were detected in 26 lesions from 20 UC patients with dysplasia and carcinomas, including 18 carcinomas, 6 dysplasia-associated masses, 1 flat dysplasia, and 1 lymph node.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a quick and easy method for detecting p53 mutations, although there are some discrepancies between the result of IHC and mutation analysis. In a study comparing the immunostaining of p53 with the TP53 gene mutation, neither the IHC nor the sequencing alone have a full capability to predict p53 status; however, when combined, these two technologies provide a more complete assessment of p53 status in patients with CRC [69]. Although immunostaining of p53 is a very valuable diagnostic tool for detecting the dysplastic change in UC, we must remember that it is not always universal, and additional methods may be needed to correctly assess p53 status in UC-associated dysplasia.
4. Conclusions
Prospective population-based observational cohort studies in patients with UC with an expert pathologist-confirmed dysplasia and carcinoma are needed to better understand the natural history of UC-associated cancers. Currently, the evaluation of p53 status by IHC might be a useful diagnostic biomarker in the diagnosis of UC-associated dysplasia.
Acknowledgments
We thank all the members who work in Division Pathology Division and Department of Tumor Pathology. This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan: grant No. 26430111 (HT).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Kornbluth A., Sachar D.B. Ulcerative colitis practice guidelines in adults: American College of Gastroenterology, Practice Parameters Committee. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2010;105:501–523. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jess T., Rungoe C., Peyrin-Biroulet L. Risk of colorectal cancer in patients with ulcerative colitis: A meta-analysis of population-based cohort studies. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2012;10:639–645. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lakatos P.L., Lakatos L. Risk for colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: Changes, causes and management strategies. World J. Gastroenterol. 2008;14:3937–3947. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.3937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Eaden J.A., Abrams K.R., Mayberry J.F. The risk of colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: A meta-analysis. Gut. 2001;48:526–535. doi: 10.1136/gut.48.4.526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rogler G. Chronic ulcerative colitis and colorectal cancer. Cancer Lett. 2014;345:235–241. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.07.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tanaka T. Development of an inflammation-associated colorectal cancer model and its application for research on carcinogenesis and chemoprevention. Int. J. Inflam. 2012;2012 doi: 10.1155/2012/658786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tanaka T. Colorectal carcinogenesis: Review of human and experimental animal studies. J. Carcinog. 2009;8:5. doi: 10.4103/1477-3163.49014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Itzkowitz S.H., Greenwald B., Meltzer S.J. Colon carcinogenesis in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 1995;1:142–158. doi: 10.1097/00004836-200305001-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Brentnall T.A., Crispin D.A., Rabinovitch P.S., Haggitt R.C., Rubin C.E., Stevens A.C., Burmer G.C. Mutations in the p53 gene: An early marker of neoplastic progression in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 1994;107:369–378. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(94)90161-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Popp C., Nichita L., Voiosu T., Bastian A., Cioplea M., Micu G., Pop G., Sticlaru L., Bengus A., Voiosu A., et al. Expression Profile of p53 and p21 in Large Bowel Mucosa as Biomarkers of Inflammatory-Related Carcinogenesis in Ulcerative Colitis. Dis. Markers. 2016;2016 doi: 10.1155/2016/3625279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rubin D.T., Turner J.R. Surveillance of dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease: The gastroenterologist-pathologist partnership. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2006;4:1309–1313. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Itzkowitz S. Colon carcinogenesis in inflammatory bowel disease: Applying molecular genetics to clinical practice. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2003;36:S70–S74. doi: 10.1097/00004836-200305001-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hussain S.P., Amstad P., Raja K., Ambs S., Nagashima M., Bennett W.P., Shields P.G., Ham A.J., Swenberg J.A., Marrogi A.J., et al. Increased p53 mutation load in noncancerous colon tissue from ulcerative colitis: A cancer-prone chronic inflammatory disease. Cancer Res. 2000;60:3333–3337. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Matts S.G. The value of rectal biopsy in the diagnosis of ulcerative colitis. Q. J. Med. 1961;30:393–407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Floren C.H., Benoni C., Willen R. Histologic and colonoscopic assessment of disease extension in ulcerative colitis. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 1987;22:459–462. doi: 10.3109/00365528708991491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sandborn W.J., Tremaine W.J., Schroeder K.W., Batts K.P., Lawson G.M., Steiner B.L., Harrison J.M., Zinsmeister A.R. A placebo-controlled trial of cyclosporine enemas for mildly to moderately active left-sided ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 1994;106:1429–1435. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(94)90394-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Geboes K., Riddell R., Ost A., Jensfelt B., Persson T., Lofberg R. A reproducible grading scale for histological assessment of inflammation in ulcerative colitis. Gut. 2000;47:404–409. doi: 10.1136/gut.47.3.404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Levine D.S., Haggitt R.C. Normal histology of the colon. Am. J. Surg Pathol. 1989;13:966–984. doi: 10.1097/00000478-198911000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Surawicz C.M., Belic L. Rectal biopsy helps to distinguish acute self-limited colitis from idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 1984;86:104–113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.DeRoche T.C., Xiao S.Y., Liu X. Histological evaluation in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterol. Rep. 2014;2:178–192. doi: 10.1093/gastro/gou031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Riddell R.H., Goldman H., Ransohoff D.F., Appelman H.D., Fenoglio C.M., Haggitt R.C., Ahren C., Correa P., Hamilton S.R., Morson B.C., et al. Dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease: Standardized classification with provisional clinical applications. Hum. Pathol. 1983;14:931–968. doi: 10.1016/S0046-8177(83)80175-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Riddell R.H. The precarcinomatous phase of ulcerative colitis. Curr. Top. Pathol. 1976;63:179–219. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-66481-6_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Odze R. Diagnostic problems and advances in inflammatory bowel disease. Mod. Pathol. 2003;16:347–358. doi: 10.1097/01.MP.0000064746.82024.D1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chen Y.X., Qiao L. Adenoma-like and non-adenoma-like dysplasia-associated lesion or mass in ulcerative colitis. J. Dig. Dis. 2013;14:157–159. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Leowardi C., Schneider M.L., Hinz U., Harnoss J.M., Tarantino I., Lasitschka F., Ulrich A., Buchler M.W., Kadmon M. Prognosis of Ulcerative Colitis-Associated Colorectal Carcinoma Compared to Sporadic Colorectal Carcinoma: A Matched Pair Analysis. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2016;23:870–876. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4915-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lam A.K., Chan S.S., Leung M. Synchronous colorectal cancer: Clinical, pathological and molecular implications. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014;20:6815–6820. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i22.6815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mir-Madjlessi S.H., Farmer R.G., Easley K.A., Beck G.J. Colorectal and extracolonic malignancy in ulcerative colitis. Cancer. 1986;58:1569–1574. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19861001)58:7<1569::AID-CNCR2820580731>3.0.CO;2-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Laine L., Kaltenbach T., Barkun A., McQuaid K.R., Subramanian V., Soetikno R. SCENIC international consensus statement on surveillance and management of dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:639–651. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.01.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Burgmann T., Rawsthorne P., Bernstein C.N. Predictors of alternative and complementary medicine use in inflammatory bowel disease: Do measures of conventional health care utilization relate to use? Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2004;99:889–893. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30033.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bernstein C.N. Ulcerative colitis with low-grade dysplasia. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:950–956. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.07.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yang X., Zhao C., An N. Random walk based method to identify prognostic genes in colorectal cancer. Oncotarget. 2017 doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15827. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Al-Sohaily S., Biankin A., Leong R., Kohonen-Corish M., Warusavitarne J. Molecular pathways in colorectal cancer. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2012;27:1423–1431. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2012.07200.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kinzler K.W., Vogelstein B. Lessons from hereditary colorectal cancer. Cell. 1996;87:159–170. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81333-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Foersch S., Neurath M.F. Colitis-associated neoplasia: Molecular basis and clinical translation. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2014;71:3523–3535. doi: 10.1007/s00018-014-1636-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Goss K.H., Groden J. Biology of the adenomatous polyposis coli tumor suppressor. J. Clin. Oncol. 2000;18:1967–1979. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.9.1967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Robles A.I., Traverso G., Zhang M., Roberts N.J., Khan M.A., Joseph C., Lauwers G.Y., Selaru F.M., Popoli M., Pittman M.E., et al. Whole-Exome Sequencing Analyses of Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Associated Colorectal Cancers. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:931–943. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.12.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Stolfi C., Rizzo A., Franze E., Rotondi A., Fantini M.C., Sarra M., Caruso R., Monteleone I., Sileri P., Franceschilli L., et al. Involvement of interleukin-21 in the regulation of colitis-associated colon cancer. J. Exp. Med. 2011;208:2279–2290. doi: 10.1084/jem.20111106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Popivanova B.K., Kostadinova F.I., Furuichi K., Shamekh M.M., Kondo T., Wada T., Egashira K., Mukaida N. Blockade of a chemokine, CCL2, reduces chronic colitis-associated carcinogenesis in mice. Cancer Res. 2009;69:7884–7892. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Becker C., Fantini M.C., Wirtz S., Nikolaev A., Lehr H.A., Galle P.R., Rose-John S., Neurath M.F. IL-6 signaling promotes tumor growth in colorectal cancer. Cell. Cycle. 2005;4:217–220. doi: 10.4161/cc.4.2.1413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Galatola M., Miele E., Strisciuglio C., Paparo L., Rega D., Delrio P., Duraturo F., Martinelli M., Rossi G.B., Staiano A., et al. Synergistic effect of interleukin-10-receptor variants in a case of early-onset ulcerative colitis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2013;19:8659–8670. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i46.8659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Becker C., Fantini M.C., Neurath M.F. TGF-beta as a T cell regulator in colitis and colon cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2006;17:97–106. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2005.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nguyen A.V., Wu Y.Y., Liu Q., Wang D., Nguyen S., Loh R., Pang J., Friedman K., Orlofsky A., Augenlicht L., et al. STAT3 in epithelial cells regulates inflammation and tumor progression to malignant state in colon. Neoplasia. 2013;15:998–1008. doi: 10.1593/neo.13952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Agoff S.N., Brentnall T.A., Crispin D.A., Taylor S.L., Raaka S., Haggitt R.C., Reed M.W., Afonina I.A., Rabinovitch P.S., Stevens A.C., et al. The role of cyclooxygenase 2 in ulcerative colitis-associated neoplasia. Am. J. Pathol. 2000;157:737–745. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64587-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Watson A.J. Chemopreventive effects of NSAIDs against colorectal cancer: Regulation of apoptosis and mitosis by COX-1 and COX-2. Histol. Histopathol. 1998;13:591–597. doi: 10.14670/HH-13.591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.June C.H., Bluestone J.A., Nadler L.M., Thompson C.B. The B7 and CD28 receptor families. Immunol. Today. 1994;15:321–331. doi: 10.1016/0167-5699(94)90080-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yin J., Harpaz N., Tong Y., Huang Y., Laurin J., Greenwald B.D., Hontanosas M., Newkirk C., Meltzer S.J. p53 point mutations in dysplastic and cancerous ulcerative colitis lesions. Gastroenterology. 1993;104:1633–1639. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(93)90639-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Blackstone M.O., Riddell R.H., Rogers B.H., Levin B. Dysplasia-associated lesion or mass (DALM) detected by colonoscopy in long-standing ulcerative colitis: An indication for colectomy. Gastroenterology. 1981;80:366–374. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Baker S.J., Preisinger A.C., Jessup J.M., Paraskeva C., Markowitz S., Willson J.K., Hamilton S., Vogelstein B. p53 gene mutations occur in combination with 17p allelic deletions as late events in colorectal tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 1990;50:7717–7722. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Brahim B.E., Mrabet A., Jouini R., Koubaa W., Sidhom B., Elloumi H., Chadli A. Immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of dysplasia in chronic inflammatory bowel disease colorectal polyps. Arab J. Gastroenterol. 2016;17:121–126. doi: 10.1016/j.ajg.2016.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rogel A., Popliker M., Webb C.G., Oren M. p53 cellular tumor antigen: Analysis of mRNA levels in normal adult tissues, embryos, and tumors. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1985;5:2851–2855. doi: 10.1128/MCB.5.10.2851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Minami K., Matsuzaki S., Hayashi N., Mokarim A., Ito M., Sekine I. Immunohistochemical study of p53 overexpression in radiation-induced colon cancers. J. Radiat Res. 1998;39:1–10. doi: 10.1269/jrr.39.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lane D.P. Cancer. p53, guardian of the genome. Nature. 1992;358:15–16. doi: 10.1038/358015a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kobel M., Piskorz A.M., Lee S., Lui S., LePage C., Marass F., Rosenfeld N., Mes Masson A.M., Brenton J.D. Optimized p53 immunohistochemistry is an accurate predictor of TP53 mutation in ovarian carcinoma. J. Pathol. Clin Res. 2016;2:247–258. doi: 10.1002/cjp2.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ohgaki H., Dessen P., Jourde B., Horstmann S., Nishikawa T., Di Patre P.L., Burkhard C., Schuler D., Probst-Hensch N.M., Maiorka P.C., et al. Genetic pathways to glioblastoma: A population-based study. Cancer Res. 2004;64:6892–6899. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Taubert H., Wurl P., Bache M., Meye A., Berger D., Holzhausen H.J., Hinze R., Schmidt H., Rath F.W. The p53 gene in soft tissue sarcomas: Prognostic value of DNA sequencing versus immunohistochemistry. Anticancer Res. 1998;18:183–187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sjogren S., Inganas M., Norberg T., Lindgren A., Nordgren H., Holmberg L., Bergh J. The p53 gene in breast cancer: Prognostic value of complementary DNA sequencing versus immunohistochemistry. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1996;88:173–182. doi: 10.1093/jnci/88.3-4.173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Zakrzewska M., Szybka M., Biernat W., Papierz T., Rieske P., Liberski P.P., Zakrzewski K. Prevalence of mutated TP53 on cDNA (but not on DNA template) in pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma with positive TP53 immunohistochemistry. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 2009;193:93–97. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2009.04.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Szybka M., Zakrzewska M., Rieske P., Pasz-Walczak G., Kulczycka-Wojdala D., Zawlik I., Stawski R., Jesionek-Kupnicka D., Liberski P.P., Kordek R. cDNA sequencing improves the detection of P53 missense mutations in colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:278. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Szybka M., Zawlik I., Kulczycka D., Golanska E., Jesien E., Kupnicka D., Stawski R., Piaskowski S., Bieniek E., Zakrzewska M., et al. Elimination of wild-type P53 mRNA in glioblastomas showing heterozygous mutations of P53. Br. J. Cancer. 2008;98:1431–1433. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Forslund A., Kressner U., Lonnroth C., Andersson M., Lindmark G., Lundholm K. P53 mutations in colorectal cancer assessed in both genomic DNA and cDNA as compared to the presence of p53 LOH. Int J. Oncol. 2002;21:409–415. doi: 10.3892/ijo.21.2.409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Williams C., Norberg T., Ahmadian A., Ponten F., Bergh J., Inganas M., Lundeberg J., Uhlen M. Assessment of sequence-based p53 gene analysis in human breast cancer: Messenger RNA in comparison with genomic DNA targets. Clin. Chem. 1998;44:455–462. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Serrati S., De Summa S., Pilato B., Petriella D., Lacalamita R., Tommasi S., Pinto R. Next-generation sequencing: Advances and applications in cancer diagnosis. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:7355–7365. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S99807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Shigaki K., Mitomi H., Fujimori T., Ichikawa K., Tomita S., Imura J., Fujii S., Itabashi M., Kameoka S., Sahara R., Takenoshita S. Immunohistochemical analysis of chromogranin A and p53 expressions in ulcerative colitis-associated neoplasia: Neuroendocrine differentiation as an early event in the colitis-neoplasia sequence. Hum. Pathol. 2013;44:2393–2399. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2013.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Munro A.J., Lain S., Lane D.P. P53 abnormalities and outcomes in colorectal cancer: A systematic review. Br. J. Cancer. 2005;92:434–444. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Noffsinger A.E., Belli J.M., Miller M.A., Fenoglio-Preiser C.M. A unique basal pattern of p53 expression in ulcerative colitis is associated with mutation in the p53 gene. Histopathology. 2001;39:482–492. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.2001.01274.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Sato A., MacHinami R. p53 immunohistochemistry of ulcerative colitis-associated with dysplasia and carcinoma. Pathol. Int. 1999;49:858–868. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1827.1999.00965.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Kobayashi S., Fujimori T., Mitomi H., Tomita S., Ichikawa K., Imura J., Fujii S., Itabashi M., Kameoka S., Igarashi Y. Immunohistochemical assessment of a unique basal pattern of p53 expression in ulcerative-colitis-associated neoplasia using computer-assisted cytometry. Diagn. Pathol. 2014;9:99. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-9-99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Magro F., Langner C., Driessen A., Ensari A., Geboes K., Mantzaris G.J., Villanacci V., Becheanu G., Borralho Nunes P., Cathomas G., et al. European consensus on the histopathology of inflammatory bowel disease. J. Crohns Colitis. 2013;7:827–851. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2013.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Kaserer K., Schmaus J., Bethge U., Migschitz B., Fasching S., Walch A., Herbst F., Teleky B., Wrba F. Staining patterns of p53 immunohistochemistry and their biological significance in colorectal cancer. J. Pathol. 2000;190:450–456. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(200003)190:4<450::AID-PATH545>3.0.CO;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]