Abstract
Alpha-2 agonists are the only single class of anesthetic drugs that induce reliable, dose-dependent sedation, analgesia, and muscle relaxation in dogs and cats. Used at low doses, as adjuncts to injectable and inhalational anesthetics, selective alpha-2 agonists dramatically reduce the amount of anesthetic drug required to induce and maintain anesthesia. This reduction in anesthetic requirements is achieved without significant depression of pulmonary function and with limited effects on cardiovascular function. Selective alpha-2 agonists can also be used postoperatively to potentiate the analgesic effects of opioids and other drugs. Given the nearly ideal pharmacodynamic profile and reversibility of alpha-2 agonists, these drugs will play a central role in balanced approaches to anesthesia and the management of perioperative pain in healthy dogs and cats.
Abstract
Résumé — Utilisation périopératoire d’agonistes et d’antagonistes alpha-2 sélectifs chez les petits animaux. Les agonistes alpha-2 constituent la seule et unique classe d’anesthésiques produisant une sédation, une analgésie et une relaxation musculaire fiables et proportionnelles à la dose administrée chez les chiens et les chats.
Utilisé à faible dose, comme appoint aux anesthésiques par injection ou par inhalation, les agonistes alpha-2 sélectifs réduisent radicalement la quantité d’anesthésiques nécessaires pour induire et maintenir l’anesthésie. La réduction des besoins en anesthésiques est obtenue sans dépression significative des fonctions respiratoires et avec des effets peu marqués sur les fonctions cardiovasculaires. Les agonistes alpha-2 sélectifs peuvent être également utilisés en période postopératoire pour potentialiser les effets analgésiques des opioïdes et d’autres drogues. Avec un profil pharmacodynamique presque idéal et une action réversible, les drogues agonistes alpha-2 joueront un rôle central dans les techniques d’anesthésie à toxicité dispersée et dans le traitement de la douleur périopératoire chez les chiens et les chats en santé.
(Traduit par Docteur André Blouin)
Introduction
Alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonists induce reliable, dose-dependent sedation, analgesia, and muscle relaxation in dogs and cats that can be readily reversed by administration of selective antagonists. Two alpha-2 agonists (xylazine, medetomidine) and 2 antagonists (yohimbine, atipamezole) are approved for use in small animals in Canada. Another alpha-2 agonist, romifidine, is approved for use in horses, but not in dogs and cats. Xylazine has been used as a sedative in small animals for over 2 decades, and medetomidine has been used for over a decade in Europe and has recently been approved for use in North America (1,2). Traditionally, these drugs have been used at relatively high doses to induce not only sedation and analgesia, but immobilization. Currently, xylazine and medetomidine are used at relatively low doses, alone or in combination with other drugs (benzodiazepines, opioids), to induce sedation for minor diagnostic and surgical procedures, and as adjuncts to injectable (ketamine, thiopental, propofol) and inhalational (halothane, isoflurane) anesthetics (3). The purpose of this article is to review relevant adrenergic physiology and pharmacology, and to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of perioperative use of selective alpha-2 agonists (medetomidine, romifidine) and antagonists (atipamezole). A search of the PubMed database was conducted using the terms medetomidine, romifidine, atipamezole, dogs, and cats. Papers concerned with the perioperative use of xylazine are included for comparison and to illustrate specific points.
Perioperative use of alpha-2 agonists in small animals has been controversial (4,5). Certainly, the initial vasoconstriction and reflex bradycardia induced by the administration of alpha-2 agonists are problematic. However, at the low doses used perioperatively, these cardiovascular effects are not as pronounced and are well tolerated by healthy dogs and cats. Alpha-2 agonists also produce a dramatic reduction in the amount of thiopental or propofol required to induce anesthesia, and the amount of isoflurane required to maintain anesthesia (6–8). Given that all 3 of these general anesthetics have dramatic effects on myocardial function and a very narrow therapeutic range, the dose reduction achieved by administering alpha-2 agonists preoperatively reduces the adverse cardiovascular effects associated with administration of most general anesthetics. Isoflurane also produces marked vasodilation and significant reductions in arterial blood pressure at concentrations normally required to induce and maintain anesthesia (9). In dogs, concurrent administration of alpha-2 agonists increases vascular tone and attenuates the vasodilation and reduction in arterial blood pressure induced by isoflurane (10,11). Therefore, preoperative administration of alpha-2 agonists counteracts the cardiovascular effects of isoflurane, first, by reducing the amount of isoflurane required to maintain anesthesia and, then, by restoring vascular tone. In sharp contrast, preoperative or concurrent administration of acepromazine — a drug that also reduces vascular tone — intensifies the vasodilation and reduction in arterial blood pressure induced by isoflurane (12). In fact, when blood pressure is monitored routinely, hypotension is by far the most common complication that occurs in anesthetized dogs and cats (13,14).
Concerns have also been raised about the potential for alpha-2 agonists to sensitize the myocardium to epinephrine-induced arrhythmias (15). Initial studies suggested that high doses of xylazine may facilitate the development of reentrant ventricular arrhythmias (premature depolarizations, tachycardia) in dogs anesthetized with thiopental and halothane — 2 drugs that dramatically sensitize the myocardium to epinephrine (16,17). Subsequent studies in dogs anesthetized with halothane or isoflurane and given lower doses of xylazine or medetomidine showed that alpha-2 agonists do not facilitate the development of reentrant ventricular arrhythmias (18,19). Results of the latter studies were confirmed by additional studies at the University of Guelph (20,21). Further, the decrease in sympathetic tone and increase in parasympathetic tone induced by the administration of selective alpha-2 agonists appears to attenuate the development of epinephrine-induced arrhythmias in dogs (22).
An increase in the occurrence of anesthetic complications has been reported following administration of xylazine to small animals by veterinarians in Ontario in 1993 (23). Failure to appreciate the dramatic reduction in anesthetic requirements produced by preoperative administration of high doses of xylazine and subsequent administration of a relative overdose of injectable or inhalational anesthetic may have contributed to the increased risk reported in this study. Further, patient monitoring standards were extremely lax a decade ago, and failure to recognize and treat significant bradyarrhythmias could have been a factor as well.
Physiology
Norepinephrine is the endogenous ligand for alpha-2 adrenergic receptors, and these receptors are located in tissues throughout the body. Alpha-2 receptors exist presynaptically and postsynaptically in neuronal and nonneuronal tissues, and extrasynaptically in the vasculature. Within the central nervous system, alpha-2 receptors located on noradrenergic neurons are called “autoreceptors” and those on nonnoradrenergic neurons are called “heteroceptors.” In general, the sedative and anxiolytic effects of alpha-2 agonists are mediated by activation of supraspinal autoreceptors located in the pons (locus ceruleus), and the analgesic effects are mediated by activation of heteroceptors located in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. However, the supraspinal autoreceptors located in the pons also play a prominent role in descending modulation of nociceptive input (24). Three distinct alpha-2 receptor subtypes (A, B, and C) have also been identified (25,26). Alpha-2 A receptors mediate sedation, analgesia, hypotension, and bradycardia, while alpha-2 B receptors mediate the initial surge in vascular resistance and reflex bradycardia. Alpha-2 C receptors mediate the hypothermia that accompanies administration of alpha-2 agonists. Subtype selective agonists are not currently available, but alpha-2 A selective agonists with fewer vascular side effects could potentially be developed in the near future.
As with other adrenergic drugs, selective alpha-2 receptor agonists induce dose-dependent changes in cardiovascular function (27–29). Cardiovascular effects are best described in 2 phases: an initial peripheral phase characterized by vasoconstriction, increased blood pressure, and reflex bradycardia; and a subsequent central phase characterized by decreased sympathetic tone, heart rate, and blood pressure. Atrioventricular blockade can also occur secondary to the initial increase in blood pressure and reflex increase in vagal tone. The peripheral cardiovascular effects are most pronounced when alpha-2 receptor agonists are given, IV, at high doses, and these effects can be reduced by giving these drugs, IM, at low doses (30). Although cardiac output decreases after administration of alpha-2 receptor agonists, blood flow to the heart, brain, and kidneys is maintained by redistribution of flow from less vital organs (31).
Unlike opioids, alpha-2 receptor agonists have little effect on pulmonary function. Respiratory rate and minute ventilation decrease after administration of xylazine or medetomidine, but blood gas values do not change appreciably. Even at relatively high doses, xylazine does not alter pH, PaCO2, and PaO2 in dogs and cats (30,32). Similarly, medetomidine and romifidine have little effect on blood gas values in dogs (33–35). Hypoxemia is a common response to administration of alpha-2 receptor agonists in most ruminants. This response appears to be an inflammatory reaction, and is confined to ruminant species that have a unique population of pulmonary intravascular macrophages (36).
Alpha-2 agonists have significant effects on gastrointestinal function. Vomiting occurs in approximately 20% of dogs and in most cats that are given xylazine or medetomidine. Normally, this is not a problem and may be advantageous if owners or hospital staff fail to withhold food from patients before anesthesia and surgery. However, the potential for development of an aspiration pneumonia exists if a properly inflated cuffed endotracheal tube is not in place. Administration of anticholinergics 10 to 20 min before administration of alpha-2 agonists appears to reduce the occurrence of vomiting in dogs (35). Vomiting also produces dramatic increases in intraocular pressure, which is a potential problem for some patients with ocular injury or disease. Administration of alpha-2 agonists increases gastrointestinal sphincter tone and decreases gastrointestinal motility. These effects are mediated by activation of visceral alpha-2 receptors and inhibition of acetycholine release.
Alpha-2 agonists also have significant effects on renal and endocrine function in small animals. Administration of xylazine or medetomidine activates alpha-2 receptors on pancreatic beta cells and inhibits release of insulin for approximately 2 h (37,38). While both drugs produce a comparable inhibition of insulin release, medetomidine produces a less dramatic change in plasma glucose concentrations (38). This difference may be due to a difference in selectivity for the alpha-2 versus the alpha-1 receptor. Xylazine, a less selective agonist, appears to increase plasma glucose concentrations directly by activating alpha-1 receptors and stimulating hepatic glucose production. Administration of medetomidine also decreases urine specific gravity and increases urine production for approximately 4 h (39). Apparently, alpha-2 agonists interfere with the action of antidiuretic hormone on the renal tubules and collecting ducts, which increases the production of dilute urine (40,41).
Clinical pharmacology
Two selective alpha-2 agonists, medetomidine and romifidine, and a selective anatgonist, atipamezole, are currently licensed for use in animals in Canada. Medetomidine is approved for use in dogs as a sedative-analgesic, and studies on the sedative, analgesic, and cardiopulmonary effects of medetomidine in cats have been completed (42–44). Romifidine is not approved for use in small animals, but studies on the sedative and cardiopulmonary effects of romifidine in dogs and cats have been completed (28,45–47). Atipamezole is approved for use in dogs for the reversal of the sedative and analgesic effects of medetomidine. These selective alpha-2 agonists and antagonists have a high affinity for the alpha-2 receptor and are administered on a mcg/kg basis, rather than a mg/kg basis.
Medetomidine is a highly selective alpha-2 agonist that is supplied as a racemic mixture of 2 optical enantiomers. Dexmedetomidine is the active enantiomer and levomedetomidine has no apparent pharmacological activity. Shortly after medetomidine was approved for use in dogs as a sedative-analgesic in North America, dexmedetomidine was approved for use in humans as a postoperative sedative in the United States. Medetomidine is approximately 10 times more selective for the alpha-2 receptor than is xylazine (48). The drug has a rapid onset of action and can be given IV or IM. After IM injection, the drug is rapidly absorbed and peak plasma concentrations are reached within 30 min. The elimination half-life after either IV or IM administration is approximately 1 h (49). Administration of medetomidine at a dose of 20 mcg/kg BW induces sedation comparable with that of xylazine at a dose of 1 mg/kg BW (50,51). When medetomidine is given IM, the onset of sedation is rapid (<10 min), regardless of dose (52). In healthy dogs, the label dose of medetomidine ranges from 30 to 60 mcg/kg BW, but IM doses of 5 to 10 mcg/kg BW are more appropriate for perioperative use when given with an opioid (53). In healthy cats, the use of medetomidine is “off-label” and IM doses of 10 to 20 mcg/kg BW appear to be appropriate for perioperative use when given with an opioid (54).
Romifidine is a selective alpha-2 agonist derived from clonidine, and is not labeled for use in small animals in Canada. The drug is more selective than xylazine but much less selective than medetomidine for the alpha-2 receptor. Romifidine has a slower onset of action and a much longer duration of action than either xylazine or medetomidine. Intramuscular administration of romifidine at a dose of 40 mcg/kg BW induces sedation comparable with that of xylazine at a dose of 1 mg/kg BW (28,51). At doses that produce equivalent degrees of sedation, romifidine induces changes in cardiovascular function that are comparable with those of xylazine and medetomidine. In healthy dogs, IM administration of romifidine at doses of 10 to 20 mcg/kg BW induces mild to moderate sedation with limited effects on cardiovascular function (28). In healthy cats, IM administration of romifidine at a dose of 40 mcg/kg BW induces moderate sedation (47). Because romifidine has not been approved for use in small animals and because clinical research experience with this drug is limited, romifidine should not be used in small animals at this time.
Atipamezole is a highly selective alpha-2 antagonist that is labeled for the reversal of the sedative and analgesic effects of medetomidine in dogs. The drug is 200 to 300 times more selective for the alpha-2 receptor than is yohimbine (48). After IM administration of atipamezole, peak plasma concentrations are reached within 10 min and the elimination half-life is approximately 2 to 3 h (atipamezole package insert). Atipamezole reverses not only the neurological effects of medetomidine, but also the cardiovascular side-effects. Therefore, atipamezole can be used to reverse the bradycardia that accompanies medetomidine administration. Atipamezole is usually given to reverse the effects of medetomidine after nonpainful diagnostic or therapeutic procedures, and it is not usually given perioperatively. Calculation of the dose of alpha-2 receptor antagonist required should always be based on the amount of agonist given and the time since administration. Generally, it is better to “underdose” than to “overdose” the antagonist. If a “relative overdose” of atipamezole is given, neurological (excitement and muscle tremors), cardiovascular (hypotension and tachycardia), and gastrointestinal (salivation and diarrhea) side effects can occur. Complete reversal of the sedative and analgesic effects of medetomidine is achieved when atipamezole is given IM to dogs and cats at 4 to 6 times and 2 to 3 times the dose of medetomidine, respectively (55,56). Atipamezole and anticholinergics can both cause dramatic increases in heart rate, and concurrent use of these drugs should be avoided.
Perioperative use
As adjuncts to general anesthetics, alpha-2 receptor agonists have a nearly ideal pharmacodynamic profile in dogs and cats. In addition to providing sedation, analgesia, and muscle relaxation, preoperative administration of xylazine or medetomidine produces substantial reductions in the amount of injectable and inhalational anesthetic required to induce and maintain anesthesia. Alpha-2 receptor agonists also attenuate the stress response to surgical trauma by reducing catecholamine and cortisol levels postoperatively (57–59). The initial increase in vascular resistance and blood pressure, and subsequent bradycardia, are potential problems, but these side effects are well tolerated by healthy dogs and cats. Vomiting is also a potential problem for some patients. As a general rule, alpha-2 agonists should not be given to pediatric or geriatric animals, or to animals with significant neurological, cardiovascular, respiratory, hepatic, or renal disease. In other words, proper patient evaluation and selection is critically important. Once preanesthetic and anesthetic drugs are given, patients should be monitored carefully throughout the perioperative period, paying special attention to heart rate and rhythm.
Alpha-2 agonists and acepromazine are the only reliable sedatives currently available for use in dogs and cats. Acepromazine is used preoperatively on a routine basis to provide sedation for catheter placement and induction of anesthesia; it is often given in combination with opioids to provide both sedation and analgesia. However, acepromazine is not suitable for every patient (brachycephalics, epileptics, boxers) and can cause significant hypotension in animals anesthetized with isoflurane (12). Medetomidine can be given preoperatively at low doses to healthy dogs and cats, alone or in combination with opioids (Table 1). Compared with acepromazine, medetomidine produces better analgesia for catheter placement and greater reductions in anesthetic requirements, and it is less likely to cause hypotension in animals anesthetized with isoflurane (59). Bradycardia and atrioventricular block can occur after administration of low doses of medetomidine, but these can be prevented by concurrent administration of atropine.
Table 1.
Preoperative sedation and analgesia for healthy dogs and cats
| Drugs | Doses for healthy dogsa | Doses for healthy catsb |
|---|---|---|
| Atropine | 0.05 mg/kg, IM | 0.05 mg/kg, IM |
| Medetomidine | 10–20 mcg/kg, IM | 20–40 mcg/kg, IM |
| Atropine | 0.05 mg/kg, IM | 0.05 mg/kg, IM |
| Medetomidine | 5–10 mcg/kg, IM | 10–20 mcg/kg, IM |
| Butorphanol | 0.2–0.4 mg/kg, IM | 0.2–0.4 mg/kg, IM |
| Atropine | 0.05 mg/kg, IM | 0.05 mg/kg, IM |
| Medetomidine | 5–10 mcg/kg, IM | 10–20 mcg/kg, IM |
| Morphine | 0.2–0.4 mg/kg, IM | 0.2–0.4 mg/kg, IM |
| Atropine | 0.05 mg/kg, IM | 0.05 mg/kg, IM |
| Medetomidine | 5–10 mcg/kg, IM | 10–20 mcg/kg, IM |
| Hydromorphone | 0.04–0.08 mg/kg, IM | 0.04–0.08 mg/kg, IM |
| Atropine | 0.05 mg/kg, IM | 0.05 mg/kg, IM |
| Medetomidine | 5–10 mcg/kg, IM | 10–20 mcg/kg, IM |
| Oxymorphone | 0.04–0.08 mg/kg, IM | 0.04–0.08 mg/kg, IM |
a Medetomidine should not be given to pediatric or geriatric dogs, or to dogs with significant neurological, cardiac, respiratory, hepatic, or renal disease
b Medetomidine should not be given to pediatric or geriatric cats, or to cats with significant neurological, cardiac, respiratory, hepatic, or renal disease. Medetomidine is not approved for use in cats in Canada
The use of anticholinergics to prevent the bradycardia and atrioventricular blockade induced by preoperative administration of selective alpha-2 agonists is controversial (33,35,60–62). Although concurrent anticholinergic administration is not mandatory, it is recommended for the following reasons: First, even at low preanesthetic doses, significant bradycardia can occur if an anticholinergic is not given concurrently with medetomidine. Second, the potential for severe vagotonic responses and profound bradycardia, secondary to surgical manipulation and administration of other anesthetic drugs, is higher during the perioperative period. And third, while concurrent administration of anticholinergics with high doses of medetomidine causes dramatic increases in vascular resistance and myocardial work, these increases are less pronounced with low doses of medetomidine.
Bradycardia is prevented more consistently when anticholinergics are given 10 to 20 min before administration of medetomidine (33,53,63), but this is not always practical. Atropine has a more rapid onset of action than does glycopyrrolate and can be given at the same time as low doses of medetomidine. It is also important to remember that anticholinergic administration enhances vagal tone initially and can increase the severity of alpha-2 agonistinduced bradycardia and atrioventricular block transiently, if atropine or glycopyrrolate is given after administration of alpha-2 agonists (35). Concurrent administration of anticholinergics with alpha-2 agonist-ketamine combinations should be avoided, because prolonged increases in heart rate can occur (64). Further, the use of anticholinergic-ketamine combinations has been associated with myocardial infarcts and perioperative mortality in cats (65).
Ultra low doses of medetomidine can be given postoperatively to dogs and cats, alone or in combination with opioids (Table 2). Administration of selective alpha-2 agonists at these doses enhances and prolongs the analgesic effects of opioids with limited effects on cardiovascular function. Lower doses of opioids can also be used, which may reduce the frequency of postoperative respiratory depression. Selective alpha-2 agonists can also be used to manage anxiety and dysphoria postoperatively. Further, the duration of action of medetomidine is significantly less than that of acepromazine, and the degree of sedation can be more readily controlled and, if necessary, reversed.
Table 2.
Postoperative sedation and analgesia for healthy dogs and cats
| Drugs | Doses for healthy dogsa | Doses for healthy catsb |
|---|---|---|
| Medetomidine | 2–4 mcg/kg, IM | 4–8 mcg/kg, IM |
| Medetomidine | 1–2 mcg/kg, IM | 2–4 mcg/kg, IM |
| Butorphanol | 0.1–0.2 mg/kg, IM | 0.1–0.2 mg/kg, IM |
| Medetomidine | 1–2 mcg/kg, IM | 2–4 mcg/kg, IM |
| Morphine | 0.1–0.2 mg/kg, IM | 0.1–0.2 mg/kg, IM |
| Medetomidine | 1–2 mcg/kg, IM | 2–4 mcg/kg, IM |
| Hydromorphone | 0.02–0.04 mg/kg, IM | 0.02–0.04 mg/kg, IM |
| Medetomidine | 1–2 mcg/kg, IM | 2–4 mcg/kg, IM |
| Oxymorphone | 0.02–0.04 mg/kg, IM | 0.02–0.04 mg/kg, IM |
a Medetomidine should not be given to pediatric or geriatric dogs, or to dogs with significant neurological, cardiac, respiratory, hepatic, or renal disease
b Medetomidine should not be given to pediatric or geriatric cats, or to cats with significant neurological, cardiac, respiratory, hepatic, or renal disease. Medetomidine is not approved for use in cats in Canada
Footnotes
Reprints will not be available from the author.
This paper was presented at the Symposium on Perioperative Pain Control held at the Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, in November 2002. The symposium was sponsored by Novartis Animal Health Inc. and run by Lifelearn Inc.
References
- 1.Greene SA, Thurmon JC. Xylazine — a review of its pharmacology and use in veterinary medicine. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 1988;11:295–313. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1988.tb00189.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cullen LK. Medetomidine sedation in dogs and cats: a review of its pharmacology, antagonism and dose. Br Vet J. 1996;152:519–535. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1935(96)80005-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Paddleford RR, Harvey RC. Alpha-2 agonists and antagonists. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 1999;29:737–745. doi: 10.1016/s0195-5616(99)50058-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tranquilli WJ, Benson GJ. Advantages and guidelines for using alpha-2 agonists as anesthetic adjuvants. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 1992;22:289–293. doi: 10.1016/s0195-5616(92)50612-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Klide AM. Precautions when using alpha-2 agonists as anesthetics or anesthetic adjuvants. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 1992;22:294–296. doi: 10.1016/s0195-5616(92)50613-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bergstrom K. Cardiovascular and pulmonary effects of a new sedative/analgesic (medetomidine) as a preanaesthetic drug in the dog. Acta Vet Scand. 1988;29:109–116. doi: 10.1186/BF03548399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cullen LK, Reynoldson JA. Xylazine or medetomidine premedication before propofol anaesthesia. Vet Rec. 1993;132:378–383. doi: 10.1136/vr.132.15.378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ewing KK, Mohammed HO, Scarlett JM, et al. Reduction of isoflurane anesthetic requirement by medetomidine and its restoration by atipamezole in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 1993;54:294–299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Steffy EP. Inhalation anesthetics. In: Thurmon JC, Tranquilli WJ, Benson GJ, eds. Lumb and Jones’ Veterinary Anesthesia. Philadephia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1996;297–329.
- 10.Lemke KA, Tranquilli WJ, Thurmon JC, et al. Hemodynamic effects of atropine and glycopyrrolate in isoflurane-xylazine- anesthetized dogs. Vet Surg. 1993;22:163–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1993.tb01693.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Keegan RD, Greene SA, Bagley RS, et al. Effects of medetomidine administration on intracranial pressure and cardiovascular variables of isoflurane-anesthetized dogs. Am J Vet Res. 1995;56:193–198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bostrom I, Nyman G, Kampa N, et al. Effects of acepromazine on renal function in anesthetized dogs. Am J Vet Res. 2003;64:590–598. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2003.64.590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gaynor JS, Dunlop CI, Wagner AE, et al. Complications and mortality associated with anesthesia in dogs and cats. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 1999;35:13–17. doi: 10.5326/15473317-35-1-13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mazzaferro E, Wagner AE. Hypotension during anesthesia in dogs and cats: recognition, causes, and treatment. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet. 2001;23:728–737. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lemke KA, Tranquilli WJ. Anesthetics, arrhythmias, and myocardial sensitization to epinephrine. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1994;205:1679–1684. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Muir WW, Werner LL, Hamlin RL. Effects of xylazine and acetylpromazine upon induced ventricular fibrillation in dogs anesthetized with thiamylal and halothane. Am J Vet Res. 1975;36:1299–1303. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tranquilli WJ, Thurmon JC, Benson GJ. Alterations in epinephrineinduced arrhythmogenesis after xylazine and subsequent yohimbine induced administration in isoflurane-anesthetized dogs. Am J Vet Res. 1988;49:1072–1075. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lemke KA, Tranquilli WJ, Thurmon JC, et al. Alterations in the arrhythmogenic dose of epinephrine after xylazine or medetomidine administration in halothane-anesthetized dogs. Am J Vet Res. 1993;54:2132–2138. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lemke KA, Tranquilli WJ, Thurmon JC, et al. Alterations in the arrhythmogenic dose of epinephrine after xylazine or medetomidine administration in isoflurane-anesthetized dogs. Am J Vet Res. 1993;54:2139–2144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pettifer GR, Dyson DH, McDonell WN. An evaluation of the influence of medetomidine hydrochloride and atipamezole hydrochloride on the arrhythmogenic dose of epinephrine in dogs during ride halothane anesthesia. Can J Vet Res. 1996;60:1–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dyson D, Pettifer G. Evaluation of the arrhythmogenicity of a low dose of acepromazine: comparison with xylazine. Can J Vet Res. 1997;61:241–245. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hayashi Y, Sumikawa K, Maze M, et al. Dexmedetomidine prevents epinephrine-induced arrhythmias through stimulation of central alpha-2 adrenoceptors in halothane-anesthetized dogs. Anesthesiology. 1991;75:113–117. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199107000-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dyson DH, Maxie MG, Schnurr D. Morbidity and mortality associated with anesthetic management in small animal veterinary practice in Ontario. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 1998;34:325–335. doi: 10.5326/15473317-34-4-325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lemke KA. Understanding the pathophysiology of perioperative pain. Can Vet J. 2004;45:405–413. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Maze M, Tranquilli W. Alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonists: defining the role in clinical anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1991;74:581–605. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Maze M, Fujinaga M. Alpha-2 adrenoceptors in pain modulation: which subtype should be targeted to produce analgesia? Anesthesiology. 2000;92:934–936. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200004000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pypendop BH, Verstegen JP. Hemodynamic effects of medetomidine in the dog: a dose titration study. Vet Surg. 1998;27:612–622. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1998.tb00539.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lemke KA. Sedative effects of intramuscular administration of a low dose of romifidine in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 1999;60:162–168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pypendop BH, Verstegen JP. Cardiovascular effects of romifidine in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 2001;62:490–495. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Klide AM, Calderwood HW, Soma LR. Cardiopulmonary effects of xylazine in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 1975;36:931–935. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lawrence CJ, Prinzen FW, de Lange S. The effect of dexmedetomidine on nutrient organ blood flow. Anesth Analg. 1996;83:1160–1165. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199612000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Haskins SC, Peiffer RL, Jr, Stowe CM. A clinical comparison of CT1341, ketamine, and xylazine in cats. Am J Vet Res. 1975;36:1537–1543. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Alibhai HI, Clarke KW, Lee YH, et al. Cardiopulmonary effects of combinations of medetomidine hydrochloride and atropine sulphate in dogs. Vet Rec. 1996;138:11–13. doi: 10.1136/vr.138.1.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bloor BC, Abdul-Rasool I, Temp J, et al. The effects of medetomidine, an alpha-2 adrenergic agonist, on ventilatory drive in the dog. Acta Vet Scand Suppl. 1989;85:65–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lemke KA. Electrocardiographic and cardiopulmonary effects of intramuscular administration of glycopyrrolate and romifidine in conscious beagle dogs. Vet Anesth Analg. 2001;28:75–86. doi: 10.1046/j.1467-2987.2000.00037.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Celly CS, Atwal OS, McDonell WN, et al. Histopathologic alterations induced in the lungs of sheep by use of alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonists. Am J Vet Res. 1999;60:154–161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Benson GJ, Thurmon JC, Neff-Davis CA. Effect of xylazine hydrochloride upon plasma glucose and serum insulin concentrations in adult pointer dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 1984;20:791–794. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Burton SA, Lemke KA, Ihle SL, et al. Effects of medetomidine on serum insulin and plasma glucose concentrations in clinically normal dogs. Am J Vet Res. 1997;58:1440–1442. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Burton S, Lemke KA, Ihle SL, et al. Effects of medetomidine on serum osmolality; urine volume, osmolality and pH; free water clearance; and fractional clearance of sodium, chloride, potassium, and glucose in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 1998;59:756–761. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gellai M, Edwards RM. Mechanism of alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonist-induced diuresis. Am J Physiol. 1988;255:317–323. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.1988.255.2.F317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Rouch AJ, Kudo LH, Hebert C. Dexmedetomidine inhibits osmotic water permeability in the rat cortical collecting duct. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997;281:62–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Vaha-Vahe T. Clinical evaluation of medetomidine, a novel sedative and analgesic drug for dogs and cats. Acta Vet Scand. 1989;30:267–273. doi: 10.1186/BF03548031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ansah OB, Raekallio M, Vainio O. Comparison of three doses of dexmedetomidine with medetomidine in cats following intramuscular administration. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 1998;21:380–387. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2885.1998.00155.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lamont LA, Bulmer BJ, Grimm KA, et al. Cardiopulmonary evaluation of the use of medetomidine hydrochloride in cats. Am J Vet Res. 2001;62:1745–1749. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.1745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.England GC, Flack TE, Hollingworth E, et al. Sedative effects of romifidine in the dog. J Small Anim Pract. 1996;37:19–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1996.tb01928.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.England GC, Watts N. Effect of romifidine and romifidine- butorphanol for sedation in dogs. J Small Anim Pract. 1997;38:561–564. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1997.tb03319.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Selmi AL, Barbudo-Selmi GR, Moreira CF, et al. Evaluation of sedative and cardiorespiratory effects of romifidine and romifidinebutorphanol in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2002;221:506–510. doi: 10.2460/javma.2002.221.506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Virtanen R. Pharmacological profiles of medetomidine and its antagonist, atipamezole. Acta Vet Scand Suppl. 1989;85:29–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Salonen JS. Pharmacokinetics of medetomidine. Acta Vet Scand Suppl. 1989;85:49–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Vainio O. Introduction to the clinical pharmacology of medetomidine. Acta Vet Scand Suppl. 1989;85:85–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Redondo JI, Gomez-Villamandos RJ, Santisteban JM, et al. Romifidine, medetomidine or xylazine before propofol-halothane- N2O anesthesia in dogs. Can J Vet Res. 1999;63:31–36. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Vainio O, Vaha-Vahe T, Palmu L. Sedative and analgesic effects of medetomidine in dogs. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 1989;12:225–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1989.tb00664.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Muir WW, III, Ford JL, Karpa GE, et al. Effects of intramuscular administration of low doses of medetomidine and medetomidinebutorphanol in middle-aged and old dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1999;215:1116–1120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ansah OB, Vainio O, Hellsten C, et al. Postoperative pain control in cats: clinical trials with medetomidine and butorphanol. Vet Surg. 2002;31:99–103. doi: 10.1053/jvet.2002.31047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Vaha-Vahe AT. The clinical effectiveness of atipamezole as a medetomidine antagonist in the dog. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 1990;13:198–205. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1990.tb00769.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Vaha-Vahe AT. Clinical effectiveness of atipamezole as a medetomidine antagonist in cats. J Small Anim Pract. 1990;1:193–197. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1990.tb00769.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Benson GJ, Grubb TL, Neff-Davis C, et al. Perioperative stress response in the dog: effect of pre-emptive administration of medetomidine. Vet Surg. 2000;29:85–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.2000.00085.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ko JC, Mandsager RE, Lange DN, et al. Cardiorespiratory responses and plasma cortisol concentrations in dogs treated with medetomidine before undergoing ovariohysterectomy. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2000;217:509–514. doi: 10.2460/javma.2000.217.509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Vaisanen M, Raekallio M, Kuusela E, et al. Evaluation of the perioperative stress response in dogs administered medetomidine or acepromazine as part of the preanesthetic medication. Am J Vet Res. 2002;63:969–975. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2002.63.969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Short CE. Effects of anticholinergic treatment on the cardiac and respiratory systems in dogs sedated with medetomidine. Vet Rec. 1991;129:310–313. doi: 10.1136/vr.129.14.310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Ko JC, Fox SM, Mandsager RE. Effects of preemptive atropine administration on incidence of medetomidine-induced bradycardia in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2001;218:52–58. doi: 10.2460/javma.2001.218.52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Sinclair MD, McDonell WN, O’Grady MR, et al. The cardiopulmonary effect of romifidine in dogs with or without prior or con-current administration of glycopyrrolate. Vet Anesth Analg current. 2002;29:1–13. doi: 10.1046/j.1467-2987.2001.00056.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Vainio O, Palmu L. Cardiovascular and respiratory effects of medetomidine in dogs and influence of anticholinergics. Acta Vet Scand. 1989;30:401–408. doi: 10.1186/BF03548016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Magoon KE, Hsu WH, Hembrough FB. The influence of atropine on the cardiopulmonary effects of a xylazine-ketamine combination in dogs. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1988;293:143–153. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.van der Linde-Sipman JS, Hellebrekers LJ, Lagerwey E. Myocardial damage in cats that died after anaesthesia. Vet Q. 1992;15:91–94. doi: 10.1080/01652176.1992.9694340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
